DOCSLIB.ORG

Furthering Perspectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Furthering Perspectives Furthering Perspectives Anthropological Views of the World Anthropology Graduate Student Society Spring 2020 Volume 9 1 | P a g e Anthropology Graduate Student Society Spring 2020 Volume 9 Editor’s Note Welcome to the Spring 2020, Volume 9 edition of Furthering Perspectives: Anthropological Views of the World! I am so pleased to present the following collection of articles written by our dedicated students here at Colorado State University. Anthropology is a field that studies all of that which makes us human, and thus, Furthering Perspectives invites perspectives from a broad array of disciplines. The following collection of articles present only a few of the many theoretical and applied approaches that contribute to our anthropological knowledge. Acknowledgements The Anthropology Graduate Student Society thanks every student, reviewer, and editor who helped make this volume of possible. Thank you to all the faculty members who gave their invaluable support to students as they wrote and underwent the review process. A big thank you to all the reviewers for their feedback, and thank you to all the students who provided the cover photos for this volume. Editor-in-Chief Cynthia Ortega Cover Photo Credit Assistant Editor and Reviewer Top: Celebrating community development, Benin. Photo Julia Greer taken by Julia Greer Review Panel Bottom Left: The Great Hunt, Alex Pelissero Utah. Photo taken by Paul Andrew Du Buckner Carly DeSanto Bottom Right: Actualistic Experiment on a Bison Tibia, Furthering Perspectives Danielle Backman CSU. Photo by Denise Frazier Denise Frazier Keri Canada © 2020 Anthropology Graduate Kimberly Nichols Student Society Colorado State University | Fort Collins, CO Louise Steele Design and Layout by Cynthia Ortega Melissa Raguet-Shofield Anthropological Views of the World 2 | P a g e Contents Spring 2020 Volume 9 Anthropology Graduate Student Society Biology 5 Taxonomic Identification of Dentally-Unassociated John Johnson Postcranial Fossil Elements in Early Eocene (~56-52 MA) Mammals 10 Size Matters: Testing Dental-Based Total Body Mass Estimate Kristina Magyar Formulae-More Than a Means to Determine Diet in Early Eocene (~56-52 MA) Primates (OMOMYOIDEA, ADAPOIDEA) in the Bighorn Basin, WY Culture 17 Moshing: A Game with Complex and Subtle Undertones Denise Frazier Disaster, Resilience, Change 22 The Importance of the Social Sciences in Climate Change Research Danielle Beckman 29 The Resilience of Immigrant Populations in the United States within Julia Greer the Food System 36 Vulnerability, Resilience, and Social Justice: Addressing Systemic Shadi Azadegan Inequality in Disaster Recovery 44 Rockport Residents and Life After Harvey: Results from the 2019 Sarvis Anarella, Althaea Kress, Colorado State University Ethnographic Field School Study Zoe Shutte, Julie Spawn, Sydney Vander Waerdt, Michelle Anderson, Charlotte Dorsey, and Amanda Kircher Ecology 55 Cultural Forests of Amazonia: A Historical Ecological Analysis Grace Ellis of Forest Management in Amazonia 3 | P a g e 62 Traditional Ecological Knowledge and the National Environmental Paul Buckner Policy Act: Integrating Indigenous Perspectives, Sustainable Resource Stewardship, and Environmental Impacts Analysis Health 76 Curbing Disease, Building a System: Partners in Health’s Julia Reedy Response to the West African Ebola Epidemic 87 The Role of Public Libraries in Community Health Sheri McCaskill 95 An Epidemic Crisis: The Disastrous HIV Infections Among Yan Xue Rural Blood Donors in China Theory 102 The Legacy of Classical Sociological Theory: Androcentrism Carolyn Conant and Universalism in the Tradition of the Canon 4 | P a g e Taxonomic Identification of Dentally-Unassociated Postcranial Fossil Elements in Early Eocene (~56-52 MA) Mammals John Johnson Introduction the earliest true primates (Adapoidea, At the beginning of the 2019 CSU Omomyoidea) arose. Paleontological Field School, there were a vast This will benefit the discipline of number of postcranial fossils in the Primate Origins anthropology by providing the field with Lab that were unidentified and unassociated with information and resources about postcranial and dentition. These specimens were filling a large locomotive adaption evolution. Having this section of the lab, while not supplying the lab with information could further the understanding of the any valuable data at the time. In order for these human body, as well as the environment where the specimens to yield data for research, they would Order Primates first began. These methods, which first have to be identified to a referenceable taxon have been applied to modern, extant, mammals, (e.g. genus and/or species). This led to the following could be applied to extinct animals of not just the research question: could zooarchaeological Eocene, but also to Pleistocene fauna of North methods, as used on modern extant faunal remains, America, which humans have had an impact on. By be applied to extinct faunal postcranial remains for combining the practices of paleontology and taxonomic identification and taphonomic zooarchaeology, the understanding of the Order descriptions in the absence of associated dental Primates can well be expanded. elements? Teeth are the most common anatomical Methods and Materials elements in the vertebrate fossil record and are the The study sample was obtained from the primary means of identifying fossil taxa. If CSU Department of Anthropology and Geography’s postcranial remains are recovered in association Primate Origins Lab collection of early Eocene (~56- with teeth, reliable taxonomic designations can be 52 Ma) Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, WY made. In this project, zooarchaeological methods fauna. The fossil specimens were recovered during were used to identify fossil anatomical elements the ANTH 470 Paleontology Field School 2013-2019 lacking dental associations. The research consulted field seasons and consisted of more than 200 fossil published descriptions of postcranial remains to specimens. Most of the specimens that were build a database of information and documents that examined were mammalian, with a few exceptions. could be used for postcranial-based taxonomic Within the unidentified specimens, some reptiles identification. The fossils used in this research were and birds were found among the sample. The obtained from the CSU Primate Origins Lab. First, reptiles and birds, however, will not be included in the methodology was tested against fossil this research’s results. This research will focus specimens in which dental & postcranial elements primarily on the mammals in the hopes of were recovered in association. Second, the positive identifying postcranial elements of the earliest results allowed the methodology to be applied to primates and their relatives, the Plesiadapiforms, unassociated postcranial fossil elements. With that existed during the Eocene. taxonomic identification, postcranial remains of The process used to identify the taxa starts primates, their taxonomic relatives, and sympatric with first identifying the Bunn Size Class for each fauna can be examined for adaptive variations with fossil element in the collection. This ranks the the goal of understanding the paleobiome in which postcranial elements from the smallest size (Size 5 | P a g e 1A; less than 10 lbs.) up to the largest size (Size 6; triangular. On average, the medial-lateral breadth of greater than 6000 lbs.) (Bunn 1982). Each of the Hyracotherium’s distal epiphysis is roughly 15±5 mm species documented to be found in the Eocene (Wood et al. 2011; Kitts 1956). Hyracotherium thus received a Bunn Size Class as well, in order to falls into the size class 1B to 2 (10-250 lbs.) (Bunn minimize the total number of faunae that had to be 1982). investigated for each fossil. This created a bias on When comparing Hyracotherium to the fossils that would be first observed in this Homogalax, there are some notable size differences in research, due to the desire to primarily identify the distal humerus. Hyracotherium (an early horse) primates. Given the size of the primates of the and Homogalax (an early tapir) both belong to the Eocene Epoch, the first postcranial fossils identified in this research were those in the 1A to 2 size range Order Perissodactyla. Hyracotherium is smaller in (less than 10 lbs. to 250 lbs.) (Bunn 1982). total body mass (TBM) when compared to the Each fossil fragment was then identified to its much larger Homogalax. Homogalax’s distal humerus skeletal element (e.g., humerus, radius, femur) and medial-lateral breadth tends to be 25±2 mm (Rose the portion of the bone (e.g., distal, proximal) it 1996). By documenting the presence of all these represented. By identifying the fossil fragment, the characteristics, as well as determining it to be too research was able to identify key osteological small to be Homogalax, the fossil specimen can be features that might be present. This would include attributed to Hyracotherium (Fossil example seen in features such as the presence of a supertrochlear Figure 1). foramen on the distal end of the humerus, or the direction and height of the greater trochanter on the proximal end of the femur. From here, linear measurements were obtained using calipers. The calipers were accurate to the hundredth of a millimeter. This included maximum length of the fossil, maximum width of the epiphysis, maximum diameter of the shaft, and independent measurements of the osteological features that are present. Once this data was obtained, the fossils could be compared with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The World at the Time of Messel: Conference Volume
    T. Lehmann & S.F.K. Schaal (eds) The World at the Time of Messel - Conference Volume Time at the The World The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 2011 Frankfurt am Main, 15th - 19th November 2011 ISBN 978-3-929907-86-5 Conference Volume SENCKENBERG Gesellschaft für Naturforschung THOMAS LEHMANN & STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL (eds) The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference Frankfurt am Main, 15th – 19th November 2011 Conference Volume Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung IMPRINT The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Conference Volume Publisher PROF. DR. DR. H.C. VOLKER MOSBRUGGER Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editors DR. THOMAS LEHMANN & DR. STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected]; [email protected] Language editors JOSEPH E.B. HOGAN & DR. KRISTER T. SMITH Layout JULIANE EBERHARDT & ANIKA VOGEL Cover Illustration EVELINE JUNQUEIRA Print Rhein-Main-Geschäftsdrucke, Hofheim-Wallau, Germany Citation LEHMANN, T. & SCHAAL, S.F.K. (eds) (2011). The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates. 22nd International Senckenberg Conference. 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main. Conference Volume. Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main. pp. 203.
    [Show full text]
  • New Fossils of Oldest American Primate 16 November 2011
    New fossils of oldest American primate 16 November 2011 (PhysOrg.com) -- Johns Hopkins researchers have Prior excavations in the same region revealed identified the first ankle and toe bone fossils from fossils of early relatives of horses, carnivores and the earliest North American true primate, which rodents, as well as Teilhardina. The researchers they say suggests that our earliest forerunners screened through hundreds of pounds of may have dwelled or moved primarily in trees, like sedimentary rock, reducing it to fine-grained modern day lemurs and similar mammals. concentrate, which was transported back to the lab for examination under the microscope. Some early Previous excavations have yielded pieces of the primate teeth specimens are known to be many jaw and teeth of Teilhardina, primates that first times smaller than a grain of rice and only appear appeared just after the beginning of the Eocene as specks to the human eye. Under the Epoch about 55.5 million years ago. In a report on microscope, the researchers discovered not only their analysis of the fossils, published in the teeth and jawbones from Teilhardina as before, but October issue of the American Journal of Physical also three fossilized toe bones and three ankle Anthropology, the Johns Hopkins team said they bones, which Rose says are the first found in North identified the latest bones when they went America. The bones were relatively free of attached prospecting for evidence of the earliest Eocene sediment and appeared smooth and dark - due to mammals in the badlands of the Bighorn Basin, the type of minerals accumulated during Wyoming, an area rich in fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Hapalodectes (Mesonychia, Mammalia) from the Paleocene of Mongolia
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236617870 The Earliest Hapalodectes (Mesonychia, Mammalia) from the Paleocene of Mongolia Article in Paleontological Journal · July 2001 CITATIONS READS 10 212 1 author: Alexey V. Lopatin Russian Academy of Sciences 369 PUBLICATIONS 1,647 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: New genera of baleen whales (Cetacea, Mammalia) from the Miocene of the northern Caucasus and Ciscaucasia View project Early evolution of mammals View project All content following this page was uploaded by Alexey V. Lopatin on 05 August 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Paleontological Journal, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2001, pp. 426–432. Translated from Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, No. 4, 2001, pp. 90–96. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2001 by Lopatin. English Translation Copyright © 2001 by åÄIä “Nauka /Interperiodica” (Russia). The Earliest Hapalodectes (Mesonychia, Mammalia) from the Paleocene of Mongolia A. V. Lopatin Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow, 117868 Russia Received October 20, 1999 Abstract—A lower jaw containing complete tooth rows of the earliest hapalodectid mesonychian, Hapalo- dectes dux sp. nov., is described from the Upper Paleocene of Tsagan-Khushu, Mongolia (Naran Bulak Forma- tion, Zhigden Member). The new species is smaller than the Middle Eocene H. serus and larger than the Early Eocene H. hetangensis. The lower molars of H. dux have distinct metaconid, protocristid, rudimentary hypo- conulid, and entoconid; M2 and M3 are equal in size. These characters suggest that H. dux is the most primitive species of the genus Hapalodectes.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes
    Functional Morphology of the Vertebral Column in Remingtonocetus (Mammalia, Cetacea) and the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotion in Early Archaeocetes by Ryan Matthew Bebej A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Philip D. Gingerich, Co-Chair Professor Philip Myers, Co-Chair Professor Daniel C. Fisher Professor Paul W. Webb © Ryan Matthew Bebej 2011 To my wonderful wife Melissa, for her infinite love and support ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank each of my committee members. I will be forever grateful to my primary mentor, Philip D. Gingerich, for providing me the opportunity of a lifetime, studying the very organisms that sparked my interest in evolution and paleontology in the first place. His encouragement, patience, instruction, and advice have been instrumental in my development as a scholar, and his dedication to his craft has instilled in me the importance of doing careful and solid research. I am extremely grateful to Philip Myers, who graciously consented to be my co-advisor and co-chair early in my career and guided me through some of the most stressful aspects of life as a Ph.D. student (e.g., preliminary examinations). I also thank Paul W. Webb, for his novel thoughts about living in and moving through water, and Daniel C. Fisher, for his insights into functional morphology, 3D modeling, and mammalian paleobiology. My research was almost entirely predicated on cetacean fossils collected through a collaboration of the University of Michigan and the Geological Survey of Pakistan before my arrival in Ann Arbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Thewissen Et Al. Reply Replying To: J
    NATURE | Vol 458 | 19 March 2009 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS ARISING Hippopotamus and whale phylogeny Arising from: J. G. M. Thewissen, L. N. Cooper, M. T. Clementz, S. Bajpai & B. N. Tiwari Nature 450, 1190–1194 (2007) Thewissen etal.1 describe new fossils from India that apparentlysupport fossils, Raoellidae or the raoellid Indohyus is more closely related to a phylogeny that places Cetacea (that is, whales, dolphins, porpoises) as Cetacea than is Hippopotamidae (Fig. 1). Hippopotamidae is the the sister group to the extinct family Raoellidae, and Hippopotamidae exclusive sister group to Cetacea plus Raoellidae in the analysis that as more closely related to pigs and peccaries (that is, Suina) than to down-weights homoplastic characters, althoughin the equallyweighted cetaceans. However, our reanalysis of a modified version of the data set analysis, another topology was equally parsimonious. In that topology, they used2 differs in retaining molecular characters and demonstrates Hippopotamidae moved one node out, being the sister group to an that Hippopotamidae is the closest extant family to Cetacea and that Andrewsarchus, Raoellidae and Cetacea clade. In neither analysis is raoellids are the closest extinct group, consistent with previous phylo- Hippopotamidae closer to the pigs and peccaries than to Cetacea, the genetic studies2,3. This topology supports the view that the aquatic result obtained by Thewissen et al.1. In all our analyses, pachyostosis adaptations in hippopotamids and cetaceans are inherited from their (thickening) of limb bones and bottom walking, which occur in hippo- common ancestor4. potamids9,10, are interpreted to have evolved before the pachyostosis of To conduct our analyses, we started with the same published matrix the auditory bulla, as seen in raoellids and cetaceans1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming
    Distribution and Stratigraphip Correlation of Upper:UB_ • Ju Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming U,S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESS IONAL PAPER 1540 Cover. A member of the American Museum of Natural History 1896 expedition enter­ ing the badlands of the Willwood Formation on Dorsey Creek, Wyoming, near what is now U.S. Geological Survey fossil vertebrate locality D1691 (Wardel Reservoir quadran­ gle). View to the southwest. Photograph by Walter Granger, courtesy of the Department of Library Services, American Museum of Natural History, New York, negative no. 35957. DISTRIBUTION AND STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION OF UPPER PALEOCENE AND LOWER EOCENE FOSSIL MAMMAL AND PLANT LOCALITIES OF THE FORT UNION, WILLWOOD, AND TATMAN FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Upper part of the Will wood Formation on East Ridge, Middle Fork of Fifteenmile Creek, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. The Kirwin intrusive complex of the Absaroka Range is in the background. View to the west. Distribution and Stratigraphic Correlation of Upper Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming By Thomas M. Down, Kenneth D. Rose, Elwyn L. Simons, and Scott L. Wing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1540 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field
    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Primate Evolution
    8. Primate Evolution Jonathan M. G. Perry, Ph.D., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Stephanie L. Canington, B.A., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Learning Objectives • Understand the major trends in primate evolution from the origin of primates to the origin of our own species • Learn about primate adaptations and how they characterize major primate groups • Discuss the kinds of evidence that anthropologists use to find out how extinct primates are related to each other and to living primates • Recognize how the changing geography and climate of Earth have influenced where and when primates have thrived or gone extinct The first fifty million years of primate evolution was a series of adaptive radiations leading to the diversification of the earliest lemurs, monkeys, and apes. The primate story begins in the canopy and understory of conifer-dominated forests, with our small, furtive ancestors subsisting at night, beneath the notice of day-active dinosaurs. From the archaic plesiadapiforms (archaic primates) to the earliest groups of true primates (euprimates), the origin of our own order is characterized by the struggle for new food sources and microhabitats in the arboreal setting. Climate change forced major extinctions as the northern continents became increasingly dry, cold, and seasonal and as tropical rainforests gave way to deciduous forests, woodlands, and eventually grasslands. Lemurs, lorises, and tarsiers—once diverse groups containing many species—became rare, except for lemurs in Madagascar where there were no anthropoid competitors and perhaps few predators. Meanwhile, anthropoids (monkeys and apes) emerged in the Old World, then dispersed across parts of the northern hemisphere, Africa, and ultimately South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving the Relationships of Paleocene Placental Mammals
    Biol. Rev. (2015), pp. 000–000. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12242 Resolving the relationships of Paleocene placental mammals Thomas J. D. Halliday1,2,∗, Paul Upchurch1 and Anjali Goswami1,2 1Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K. 2Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K. ABSTRACT The ‘Age of Mammals’ began in the Paleocene epoch, the 10 million year interval immediately following the Cretaceous–Palaeogene mass extinction. The apparently rapid shift in mammalian ecomorphs from small, largely insectivorous forms to many small-to-large-bodied, diverse taxa has driven a hypothesis that the end-Cretaceous heralded an adaptive radiation in placental mammal evolution. However, the affinities of most Paleocene mammals have remained unresolved, despite significant advances in understanding the relationships of the extant orders, hindering efforts to reconstruct robustly the origin and early evolution of placental mammals. Here we present the largest cladistic analysis of Paleocene placentals to date, from a data matrix including 177 taxa (130 of which are Palaeogene) and 680 morphological characters. We improve the resolution of the relationships of several enigmatic Paleocene clades, including families of ‘condylarths’. Protungulatum is resolved as a stem eutherian, meaning that no crown-placental mammal unambiguously pre-dates the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary. Our results support an Atlantogenata–Boreoeutheria split at the root of crown Placentalia, the presence of phenacodontids as closest relatives of Perissodactyla, the validity of Euungulata, and the placement of Arctocyonidae close to Carnivora. Periptychidae and Pantodonta are resolved as sister taxa, Leptictida and Cimolestidae are found to be stem eutherians, and Hyopsodontidae is highly polyphyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • WHALE HUNT: SEARCHING for WHALE FOSSILS: a SHORTER NARRATIVE More Suitable for Teacher-Directed “Whale Hunt”
    WHALE HUNT: SEARCHING FOR WHALE FOSSILS: a SHORTER NARRATIVE More Suitable for Teacher-Directed “Whale Hunt” 1. We have NO fossils of modern whales earlier than about 25 million years ago (mya). However, for many years, we have been finding a number of fossils of various primitive whales (archaeocetes) between 25 and 45 million years old, and somewhat different from modern whales, e.g. with very distinctive teeth An example of these early whales would be Dorudon. Place the fossil picture strip of Dorudon at about 36 mya on your timeline (actual range about 39-36 mya); (“mya”= millions of years ago). 2. As more fossils have been discovered from the early Eocene (55 to 34 mya), we searched for a land mammal from which whales most likely evolved. The group of animals that had features like those distinctive teeth that are also found in the earliest primitive whales, was called the Mesonychids. A typical example of these animals was Pachyaena. Mesonychids also had hooves, suggesting that whales may be related to other animals with hooves, like cows, horses, deer and pigs. Place the Pachyaena strip at about the 55 mya level on your timeline. Mesonychids lived from 58-34 mya. 3. In 1983, all we had were these primitive whales and mesonychids, with a big gap in between. This year, paleontologist Philip Gingerich was searching in Eocene deposits in Pakistan, and found the skull of an amazing fossil. It had teeth like the Dorudon whale, with whale-like ear bones and other features, but it was much older (50 mya), and there were indications that it had four legs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Marine Mammals
    Romero, A. 2009. The Biology of Marine Mammals. The Biology of Marine Mammals Aldemaro Romero, Ph.D. Arkansas State University Jonesboro, AR 2009 2 INTRODUCTION Dear students, 3 Chapter 1 Introduction to Marine Mammals 1.1. Overture Humans have always been fascinated with marine mammals. These creatures have been the basis of mythical tales since Antiquity. For centuries naturalists classified them as fish. Today they are symbols of the environmental movement as well as the source of heated controversies: whether we are dealing with the clubbing pub seals in the Arctic or whaling by industrialized nations, marine mammals continue to be a hot issue in science, politics, economics, and ethics. But if we want to better understand these issues, we need to learn more about marine mammal biology. The problem is that, despite increased research efforts, only in the last two decades we have made significant progress in learning about these creatures. And yet, that knowledge is largely limited to a handful of species because they are either relatively easy to observe in nature or because they can be studied in captivity. Still, because of television documentaries, ‘coffee-table’ books, displays in many aquaria around the world, and a growing whale and dolphin watching industry, people believe that they have a certain familiarity with many species of marine mammals (for more on the relationship between humans and marine mammals such as whales, see Ellis 1991, Forestell 2002). As late as 2002, a new species of beaked whale was being reported (Delbout et al. 2002), in 2003 a new species of baleen whale was described (Wada et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus/Species Skull Ht Lt Wt Stage Range Abacinonyx See Acinonyx Abathomodon See Speothos A
    Genus/Species Skull Ht Lt Wt Stage Range Abacinonyx see Acinonyx Abathomodon see Speothos A. fossilis see Icticyon pacivorus? Pleistocene Brazil Abelia U.Miocene Europe Absonodaphoenus see Pseudarctos L.Miocene USA A. bathygenus see Cynelos caroniavorus Acarictis L.Eocene W USA cf. A. ryani Wasatchian Colorado(US) A. ryani Wasatchian Wyoming, Colorado(US) Acinomyx see Acinonyx Acinonyx M.Pliocene-Recent Europe,Asia,Africa,N America A. aicha 2.3 m U.Pliocene Morocco A. brachygnathus Pliocene India A. expectata see Miracinonyx expectatus? Or Felis expectata? A. intermedius M.Pleistocene A. jubatus living Cheetah M.Pliocene-Recent Algeria,Europe,India,China A. pardinensis 91 cm 3 m 60 kg Astian-Biharian Italy,India,China,Germany,France A. sp. L.Pleistocene Tanzania,Ethiopia A. sp. Cf. Inexpectatus Blancan-Irvingtonian California(US) A. studeri see Miracinonyx studeri Blancan Texas(US) A. trumani see Miracinonyx trumani Rancholabrean Wyoming,Nevada(US) Acionyx possibly Acinonyx? A. cf. Crassidens Hadar(Ethiopia) Acrophoca 1.5 m U.Miocene-L.Pliocene Peru,Chile A. longirostris U.Miocene-L.Pliocene Peru A. sp. U.Miocene-L.Pliocene Chile Actiocyon M-U.Miocene W USA A. leardi Clarendonian California(US) A. sp. M.Miocene Oregon(US) Adcrocuta 82 cm 1.5 m U.Miocene Europe,Asia A. advena A. eximia 80 cm 1.5 m Vallesian-Turolian Europe(widespread),Asia(widespread) Adelphailurus U.Miocene-L.Pliocene W USA, Mexico,Europe A. kansensis Hemphillian Arizona,Kansas(US),Chihuahua(Mexico) Adelpharctos M.Oligocene Europe Adilophontes L.Miocene W USA A. brachykolos Arikareean Wyoming(US) Adracodon probably Adracon Eocene France A. quercyi probably Adracon quercyi Eocene France Adracon U.Eocene-L.Oligocene France A.
    [Show full text]