The Coco River Patrol and the Small Wars Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Coco River Patrol and the Small Wars Manual THE COCO RIVER PATROL AND THE SMALL WARS MANUAL A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University by Captain Jon T. Hoffman, USMC * * * * * The Ohio State University 1 989 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Ailan R. Millett ~,6(.~ Hao Chang Adviser Department of History Williamson Murray Copyright by Jon Thomas Hoff man 1 989 VITA September 23, 1955 . Born - Fremont, Ohio 1 9 7 8 • • • • • • • • B.A., Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 1979-1981 School of Law and Graduate School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 1981-1982 The Basic School and Infantry Officer Course, Quantico, Virginia 1982-1988 2nd Battalion, 3rd Marines, 2nd Battalion, 23rd Marines, U.S. Marine Corps FIELD OF STUDY Major Field: U.S. Military History ii TABLE OF CONTENTS VITA ii LIST OF FIGURES iv INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER PAGE I. BLAZING THE TRAIL ••••• 5 II. CLEARING THE EASTERN AREA • 1 5 III. INTO THE LION'S DEN .• 38 IV. CONTINUING THE CAMPAIGN • 64 V. THE SMALL WARS MANUAL • 90 CONCLUSIONS • • • • . • • • 99 NOTES • • • • 103 BIBLIOGRAPHY 11 3 iii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURES PAGE 1 • Nicaragua 3 2. The Coco River Area • 4 3. The Battle of Ililiquas • . 50 4. The Poteca Area • • • • 63 iv INTRODUCTION The Marine Corps published the first Small Wars Manual in 1935 as a compilation of its experience and doctrine in what is now called "low-intensity conflict." The Marines revised and reprinted the Manual in 1940, but the World War II emphasis on large-scale amphibious assaults soon shunted the work out of mount-out boxes and into museums. In recent years, policy-makers, defense analysts, and military leaders have renewed their interest in the field of low intensity conflict and counterinsurgency warfare. As a result, the Corps has rescued the Small Wars Manual from the dustbin. The Commandant has praised it, and other officers have described it in glowing terms. According to one writer, the Manual "is considered by many to be the most definitive official military document around today. 111 In their rush to learn from this "rich heritage," many analysts have failed to evaluate the Manual's background and origins. In an introduction to a recent reprint of the Manual, Ronald Schaffer identified Major Harold Utley as a primary 2 force behind the original edition. In fact, the Marine officer developed much of the document himself, adapting 1 2 drafts of his earlier manuscripts on the subject. His experience in small wars included service in the Haitian gendarmerie in the period following the First World War, and duty as the commanding officer of the Eastern Area of Nicaragua during the American intervention there in the late 1920's and early 1930's. In the course of the latter campaign, he developed a close relationship with a subordinate, Captain Merritt A. Edson. This officer's operations in the Coco River basin constituted the bulk of all combat actions in Utley's Nicaraguan domain. This study will recount the story of Edson's three patrols up the Coco River and then detail the links between those operations and the Small Wars Manual. Edson's small­ scale activities, minor skirmishes, and demanding field experiences played a major role in the development of Marine Corps policy regarding small wars. An evaluation of that process will thus yield some valuable insights into the applicability of the Manual to modern counterinsurgency campaigns. .3 /"'\ I .. ., __ ,_ .. _/J ' f • Ocota,Z '\ I ,- ...' } iYlnote~"'• l.a<e.!f4J'l~u.t(, ~/Ydlld_fZl<t- Nortli faciflc (}ctan ' ,,,- .......... ... __ ,. - ... \ I ........ , _.,, Figure 1. Nicaragua ~Jo f ~fU'A D~v le-RR1roRY CA!£ G~lfCiAS 7/, ~""' ~jO 1'-¥'°1p41 "..;..~ 'J ~,l'··t- or ...,\l-;{ •~,rt-: t.:"-v«: '1~.,&S' ..."-· 1'111sr,.,,.,-t5 • .... \\~ ~ ;,<.. eK UA8UL 'to~ • io"' •"Bo,e@,, t-.J. ; ~ ...~ I ~ • GA111<080 Figure 2. The Coco River area. Adapted from Marine Corps Gazette (August 1936)p.19. .{::" CHAPTER I BLAZING THE TRAIL The United States Marine Corps had considerable expe­ rience in Nicaragua by the late 1920's. The first ship's detachment had landed in that unstable country in 1853, and subsequent missions to protect American lives and prop­ erty became routine. The largest interventions occurred in 1910 and 1912, spearheaded by Major Smedley Butler's battalion from Panama. A substantial legation guard served as a permanent presence from that time forward. These efforts brought some measure of political stability to Nicaragua, but did nothing to alleviate the underlying hostility between the Liberal and Conservative camps. Diplomatic negotiations in 1924 seemed to break the cycle of instability. The opposing parties formed a coali­ tion government and an American-supervised constabulary. In turn, the U.S. withdrew the embassy force, which had become a hated symbol to Nicaraguan nationalists. But, the situation soon deteriorated; a Conservative element turned its erstwhile partners out of the government, and the Liberals began a revolt with the support of Mexican arms and money. In May 1927, the U.S brokered a peace 5 6 agreement, backed by a Marine regiment and an air squadron. Most of the revolutionaries turned in their arms and awaited the elections scheduled for the following year. One Liberal leader refused to endorse the Tipitapa accord. Augusto Cesar Sandino had "imbibed a heady draught of Central American nationalism along with the aperatif of 3 soc1a. 1 re f orm II d ur1ng. a 1 eng th y s t ay in. Mex1co. He took his small band of armed men into the difficult country-side of Nueva Segovia, pillaged a mine and a town, and gathered recruits with nationalistic propaganda and promises of loot. In July he led a force of several hundred men against the Marine and constabulary garrison at Ocotal. The defenders and their aerial reinforcements inflicted numerous casual- ties and drove Sandino out of town. Thereafter, the rebel leader learned to avoid conventional confrontations with his better-armed opponents: "Our army is well prepared and convinced at the same time that our victory does not consist in staying at such and such position but to keep latent our armed protest against the invaders. 114 Marine forces, increased to brigade strength, pushed into Nueva Segovia and drove the rebel band out of its stronghold. Rumors and intelligence assessments indicated 5 that Sandino would move into eastern Nicaragua. This sparsely populated region comprised two-thirds of the nation, from the central highlands to the Caribbean coast. It contained the bulk of foreign investment in the country, 7 mainly lumbering, mining, and plantation operations. A small railroad and nine rivers carried products to the handful of tiny coastal towns which served as commercial centers. One of the major transportation arteries was the Coco River, which had its headwaters in the highlands and flowed hundreds of miles eastward into the Caribbean. Roads did not exist; overland traffic moved by foot or mule on rough jungle trails. Much of the population con- sisted of Miskita Indians and other tribes. The few Nicaraguans of Spanish and mestizo descent were strongly Liberal and had supported earlier rebellions against Conservative rule. Here, Sandino hoped to garner support, strike at lucrative economic targets, and avoid the govern- men t ' s main. f orces. 6 Brigade headquarters reacted by reinforcing the single company that garrisoned the coastal towns. Major Utley assumed command of the newly-formed Eastern Area on 22 January 1928. He had no maps, no orders, few troops, and an area of responsibility loosely defined as "the east coast of Nicaragua and such territory inland as can be controlled by troops supplied from the east coast of Nicaragua. 117 He established his headquarters, which con- sisted of himself and a bugler, at Puerto Cabezas on 24 February. Utley quickly formulated a strategy: My plan is to deny the bandits free territory to the limit of my ability to supply posts, to protect American interests, and to guard the line of the [Coco] as far up as Bocay • . • By keeping up patrolling 8 (aerial and ground), between posts, and in the areas covered, it is believed that the mission can be accomplished, and territory, supplies, and re-enforce­ ments denied to the bandits. 8 The head of naval forces in Nicaragua, known as Commander Special Service Squadron (COMSPERON), contributed his ship's detachments to the reinforcement of the Eastern Area. Among the first to land was Edson, a newly-promoted captain in charge of the USS Denver's Marines. He and his 56 men went ashore at Puerto Cabezas on 19 February. Writing years after the campaign was over, Edson claimed that he realized the strategic importance of the Coco River when he looked at a map while still on the Denver. The waterway served as a supply channel running into the rebel- dominated interior, as well as an escape route if government forces from the west coast pursued the guerrilla bands into their lair. The Marine officer devised a three-part operation to reconnoiter the river, garrison it in order to deny it to the bandits, and send a combat patrol into the heart of Sandino's territory. He discussed these possibilities with Major Utley as the two sailed north 9 from Panama in January. The Area commander ordered Edson to begin reconnaisance patrols in late February. Two small mounted detachments went into the interior that week. On 7 March, Edson and five of his men sailed north to Cape Gracias, where they hired a boat, a guide, and three native crewmen for a trip up the Coco River. Muller, an American contractor who 9 lived along the river, volunteered to join the effort as an extra guide.
Recommended publications
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • From the USS Chattanooga to the USS Mahan: U.S
    From the USS Chattanooga to the USS Mahan: U.S. Navy Ship Visits to Tallinn When the guided missile destroyer USS Mahan (DDG-72) arrives in Tallinn harbor before Estonia's Victory Day celebrations, it will be the latest in a long line of U.S. Navy ships to drop anchor in Estonia. This USS Mahan is the fifth U.S. Navy ship to carry the name of Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840-1914), a noted U.S. naval historian and theorist. The U.S. Navy launched the first destroyer named the USS Mahan (DD-102) towards the end of the Great War on August 4, 1918 before being commissioned on October 24, 1918. Just a year later in early November 1919, the light cruiser USS Chattanooga (C-16) – one of the USS Mahan's contemporary vessels – became the first U.S. Navy ship to pay an official visit to the new Republic of Estonia. At the time, the USS Chattanooga served as the flagship of U.S. Naval Forces in European waters. This USS Chattanooga was the second ship of the same name: the original USS Chattanooga was a steamboat built in 1863 at the height of the U.S. Civil War (1861-1865) in order to re-supply General Ulysses S. Grant's hungry army in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The newer USS Chattanooga was also performing a delivery of sorts: its mission was to make sure that U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander John A. Gade (then on loan to the U.S. Department of State) made it to his new assignment as the first U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Facts Oladeinde Is a Staff Writerall for Hands Suicide Is on the Rise Nationwide
    A L p AN Stephen Murphy (left),of Boston, AMSAN Kevin Sitterson (center), of Roper, N.C., and AN Rick Martell,of Bronx, N.Y., await the launch of an F-14 Tomcat on the flight deckof USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). e 4 24 e 6 e e Hidden secrets Operation Deliberate Force e e The holidays are a time for giving. USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) e e proves what it is made of during one of e e Make time for your shipmates- it e e could be the gift of life. the biggest military operations in Europe e e since World War 11. e e e e 6 e e 28 e e Grab those Gifts e e Merchants say thanks to those in This duty’s notso tough e e uniform. Your ID card is worth more Nine-section duty is off to a great start e e e e than you may think. and gets rave reviews aboardUSS e e Anchorage (LSD 36). e e PAGE 17 e e 10 e e The right combination 30 e e e e Norfolk hospital corpsman does studio Sailors care,do their fair share e e time at night. Seabees from CBU420 build a Habitat e e e e for Humanity house in Jacksonville, Fla. e e 12 e e e e Rhyme tyme 36 e e Nautical rhymes bring the past to Smart ideas start here e e e e everyday life. See how many you Sailors learn the ropes and get off to a e e remember.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JERSEYMAN 9 Years - Nr
    Looking back... 1st Quarter 2011 "Rest well, yet sleep lightly and hear the call, if again sounded, to provide firepower for freedom…” THE JERSEYMAN 9 Years - Nr. 69 File Number: 225949 HOLD FOR RELEASE UNTIL (9 AM-ZWT) JULY 21, 1946 THE USS NEW JERSEY MOST JAPS PREFER TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY For a year-and-a-half, the USS NEW JERSEY has been having pretty much her own way in the Pacific. One op- eration after another, beginning with the Marshalls and running straight through the first air strikes on Tokyo, the big battleship has gone about the business of leveling Jap shore instal- lations and protecting carrier forces in the proverbial "one hand tied be- hind the back" fashion. Attacking Jap planes take one look at the dread- nought's gun-studded decks. That's usually enough. The one-time fast carrier task force flagship is potential enemy destruction, and no one is more aware of it than the Japs. Admiral Raymond Spruance, Fifth Fleet Commander, talks with Captain Photo courtesy of C.F. Holden, USN, of 11 Parkview Ave- John A. Altfeltis, SMC, USN/Ret. nue, Bangor, Maine, aboard the USS USS New Jersey, OS Division 1968-1969 NEW JERSEY. Edgewater, Colorado 2 The Jerseyman Looking Back… August 1, 1945 (Ship’s Archives) During the 1968/1969 Vietnam tour of USS New Jersey, crewman Bob Foster found this unsigned poem stuffed inside a crack between a shelf and the wall of his locker in “M” Division. Dated August 1, 1945, he found the poem during a review of his navy souvenirs and donated it to the ship’s archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix As Too Inclusive
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Appendix I A Chronological List of Cases Involving the Landing of United States Forces to Protect the Lives and Property of Nationals Abroad Prior to World War II* This Appendix contains a chronological list of pre-World War II cases in which the United States landed troops in foreign countries to pro- tect the lives and property of its nationals.1 Inclusion of a case does not nec- essarily imply that the exercise of forcible self-help was motivated solely, or even primarily, out of concern for US nationals.2 In many instances there is room for disagreement as to what motive predominated, but in all cases in- cluded herein the US forces involved afforded some measure of protection to US nationals or their property. The cases are listed according to the date of the first use of US forces. A case is included only where there was an actual physical landing to protect nationals who were the subject of, or were threatened by, immediate or po- tential danger. Thus, for example, cases involving the landing of troops to punish past transgressions, or for the ostensible purpose of protecting na- tionals at some remote time in the future, have been omitted. While an ef- fort to isolate individual fact situations has been made, there are a good number of situations involving multiple landings closely related in time or context which, for the sake of convenience, have been treated herein as sin- gle episodes. The list of cases is based primarily upon the sources cited following this paragraph.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
    Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Submariner Receives Military Citizen of the Year Award
    ® Serving the Hampton Roads Navy Family Vol. 17, No. 41, Norfolk, VA FLAGSHIPNEWS.COM October 15, 2009 Submariner receives Military Citizen of the Year Award BY KEVIN COPELAND and teens – enabling them to take part Commander, Submarine Force Public Affairs in the sport of BMX racing. Through the ministries’ partnership with Bethany NORFOLK — Petty Officer 1st Class Christian Services, they help promote Rodney E. Buse has been selected older child and special needs adoptions as the 54th recipient of the Samuel T. within the BMX racing community. Northern Military Citizen of the Year There are more than 500,000 children (MCOY). The award is given annual- in foster care in the U.S. alone, with ly by the Hampton Roads Chamber of 120,000 of them eligible for adoption. Commerce to recognize the military cit- However, less than 60,000 of those eli- izen who has made the most impactful gible for adoption are placed in forever contribution in the area of community families. As the administrator of BMX service. Buse was formally recognized for Christ Ministries, Buse’s fundrais- at the annual MCOY luncheon spon- ing activities, and liaisons with sponsors sored by Hampton Roads Chamber of and the Department of Social Services, Commerce and held in Norfolk. are able to make some of these chil- “I was floored, because I really didn’t dren’s dreams come true. think I had a chance,” said Buse, the “My hope is that the attention received force protection assistant and staff from my selection will greatly improve anti-terrorism officer at Commander, our efforts with the ministries during Submarine Force (SUBFOR) headquar- Photo by MC1 (AW) Tim Comerford the 2010 season,” said Buse.
    [Show full text]
  • William M. “Buster” Horak
    William M. “Buster” Horak William M. “Buster” Horak Born October 25, 1920 Killed in Action November 13, 1943 This document is to honor the life of Buster Horak, who was serving with the U.S. Navy in the Pacific when he died. Buster on Palace Grounds in Honolulu, August 13, 1941 Buster’s sister, Pearl Horak Griggs, with the help of a neighbor for military information, developed the record below in 2000. It was felt appropriate to provide her biography of Buster here, with additional pictures added. Buster survived the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 and the Battle of Midway on June 4 & 5, 1942, both of which are discussed herein. PREFACE Although many years have passed since the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, I recently received information that I previously had no knowledge. I must acknowledge my neighbor, Ed Bravo, who as a former Navy man took it upon himself to search the internet seeking information pertaining to the ships that Buster served on during World War II in the South Pacific. As a result of his effects, he obtained copies of "U.S.S. Maury, The Ship and Her History", "U.S.S. Denver Deck Log Book and War Diary, December 1, 1942 to December 31, 1942," and the "U.S.S. Denver Deck Log Book & War Diary, November 1, 1943 to November 30, 1943". The Log and War Diary were transcribed as a tribute to the 2700 men who served in the ship during her brief career. Mr. Bravo also e-mailed a letter to Paul L.
    [Show full text]
  • USNS Shoshone
    NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: ex-USS Vancouver (LPD-2) USS Vancouver underway off the coast of Oahu, Hawaii in 1967. U.S. Navy photo by PH3 D.R. Hyder. http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/09/0902.htm Vessel History The amphibious transport dock ship USS Vancouver (LPD-2) was laid down on November 19, 1960 at the New York Naval Shipyard in Brooklyn, New York. It was launched on September 15, 1962, and commissioned on May 11, 1963. Vancouver was the second of three Raleigh-class LPDs; USS La Salle (LPD-3) was the third and last of the class. LPDs are named for cities that honor celebrated pioneers and explorers. Vancouver was named for the town of Vancouver, Washington. George Vancouver (1757-1798), British naval officer and explorer, commanded a British expedition that explored Puget Sound in 1792. After completing builder’s trials off New York n the summer of 1963, Vancouver proceeded to Norfolk, Virginia for shakedown training. On August 14 Vancouver steamed from there to its new homeport of San Diego, California via the Panama Canal. Following a brief stop at Acapulco, Mexico after assisting a disabled fishing vessel, Vancouver arrived in San Diego on 2 August 31. That fall Vancouver conducted amphibious operations and visited its namesake, Vancouver, Washington. In December, Vancouver displayed its capabilities for the new Secretary of the Navy Paul H. Nitze and several high-ranking naval officers. From February to May 1964, Vancouver underwent post-shakedown maintenance and repairs in Long Beach, California. In late June it steamed north to Vancouver, Canada for that city’s annual maritime festival prior to spending the July 4th holiday in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. NAVAL BATTLE FORCE CHANGES 1 January 2010–31 December 2010 Compiled by Samuel Loring Morison
    copyright © 2011, Proceedings, u.s. naval institute, annapolis, Maryland (410) 268-6110 www.usni.org U.S. NAVAL BATTLE FORCE CHANGES 1 January 2010–31 DECEmBER 2010 Compiled by Samuel Loring Morison COMMISSIONINGS 22 Mar USNS William McLean Keel laid at National Date Name (Hull No.) Comments (T-AKE-12) Steel and Shipbuilding Corp., San Diego, CA. 16 Jan Independence (LCS-2) In Commission, Full at Mobile, AL. Homeport 10 June USNS Joshua Hum- Reactivated for duty San Diego, CA. phreys (T-AO-188) with the 5th Fleet in counterpiracy and terror- 9 Apr USCGC Bernard Name changed from ism operations. C. Webber (WPB-1101) Sentinel on 22 March. Keel laid at Bollinger 14 June USNS Charles Drew Marine, Lockport, LA. (T-AKE-10) 6 Mar Dewey (DDG-105) In Commission, Full at 11 Sep USNS Washington Seal Beach, CA. Home- Chambers (T-AKE-11) port San Diego, CA 5 Oct M/T Empire State Acquired on charter. 27 Mar New Mexico (SSN-779) In Commission, Full. Replaces one of the Homeport Groton, CT. Paul Buck-class AOTs recently stricken. A 7 May USCG Waesche In Commission, Full. second unit of this class (WMSL-7) Homeport Alameda, CA. is under construction 4 June Jason Dunham (DDG- In Commission, Special. to replace the second 109) Paul Buck AOT recently 18 July USCGC Stratton Launched at Northrup placed out of service (WMSL-752) Grumman (Ingalls Oper- ations), Pascagoula, MS. Christened 23 July. 26 July Gravely (DDG-107) In Commission, Special. 29 July Missouri (SSN-780) In Commission, Special. 31 July Missouri (SSN-780) In Commission, Full.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility Monitoring Central Archive
    Utility Monitoring Central Archive Note that the UMC Archive files mainly cover defunct stations. Some stations may however still be active and some of the info may still be valid. Naval stations on HF Algeria Chile Colombia France Ireland Israel Portugal Spain Taiwan Tunisia United Kingdom US Navy MARS Venezuela ALGERIAN NAVY Last update: 23/Jan/97 Transmission Modes: SITOR-A 100bd Erect 170Hz CW Logged Frequencies: 3753.0 5345.0 5447.0 5447.0 5939.0 5940.0 5941.0 5942.0 9115.7 11162.7 Notes on Operation: [SUN] Language: French Uses tactical callsigns of format AB12, which change daily. Selcals however appear to remain constant. On responding to selcal stations open with string "cocfn" of unknown meaning after the 4-digit translation of the selcal is sent. Off-line encryption with 5 letter groups, many having name-like groups (lagos, walid, hisar, etc), ending in the classic "stop et fin" reminiscent of other Algerian networks. Channels referred to as "r1", "r2" etc. Selcal Number VVVC 0006 VVVP 0005 VVVX 0001 Sample message: vvvx vvvx vvvx 0006 bt473 fm:ez87 to:oi10 03.07.96 a 22h01 nr:177 gr:016 texte tafna oasis llegx magic lvixx igxxx ggexx gexxx babel likxx epxxx gexxx gxxxx comer hhoca ffulk stop et fin qsl? kkkkk +? qsl a 22h15 wwh15 kk+? qsl recu tks ar ar.+-? CHILEAN NAVY Last update: 02/Oct/2001 Transmission Modes: MIL-188-141A 125bd/1650Hz ALE Racal MSM-1250 125bd 10ch VFT HF Modem "Skyfax" Logged Frequencies (all LSB): 6847.0 8080.0 9198.0 10155.0 11429.0 12103.0 17466.0 20400.0 Web Address: http://armada.mil.cl Notes on Operation: [SAT][SUN] Language: Spanish This network has a wide variety of frequencies and has also been heard in both Europe and the US.
    [Show full text]