DOCSLIB.ORG

Indiana Magazine of History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indiana Magazine of History INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY VOLUMELVIII SEPTEMBER1962 NUMBER3 ”~,,,,,,~~,,,,,,,,,,,..,,*,,.,.,~~**.,,,.,,..,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,~,,,*‘*,‘...“~.,,,,,.,‘,,,*‘,‘~~*~~ ”~,,,,,,~~,,,,,,,,,,,..,,*,,.,.,~~**.,,,.,,..,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,~,,,*‘*,‘...“~.,,,,,.,‘,,,*‘,‘~~*~~ The Democratic State Central Committee of Indiana in 1880: A Case Study in Party Tactics and Finance Albert V. Home* The October, 1880 election for state officers was im- portant to the Democratic party in Indiana, and the Novem- ber, 1880 presidential election in the Hoosier State was doubly important to the national fortunes of the party. Yet the Democracy lost both of these political contests by narrow margins of less than 8,000 votes in a total count of approxi- mately 470,000.1 This occurred despite the fact that in early September of 1880 the state had appeared to key observers as safely Democratic.2 Why did these defeats materialize? Literate and vocal participants, as well as historians, have offered a myriad of explanations about the elements, issues, and mistakes which contributed to this debacle. Stress usually has been placed on national factors : e.g., the supposed political ineptitude of the Democratic presidential candidate, General Winfield Scott Hancock ; the unfortunate appearance of the phrase “a tariff for revenue only” in the party platform; the general disorganization and anarchy within the party following the loss of the disputed election of 1876; and the *Albert V. House is professor of history at Harpur College, at Ringhamton, of the State University of New York. 1 John B. Stoll, History of the Indiana Democracy, 1816-1916 (Indianapolis, 1917), 289-290. See also Paul T. Smith, “Indiana’s Last October Campaign,” Indiana Magazine of History, XIX (December, 1!123), 332-345. 2George W. Julian, MS Journal,. 1878-1899,. October 14, 1880, George W. Julian Papers (Indiana Division, Indiana State Library, Indianapolis). Winfield S. Hancock to William H. English, August 22, September 1, 1880; William H. Barnum to English, August 22, 1880, William H. English Papers (Indiana Historical Society Library, Indianapolis). Hereafter, unless otherwise indicated, all letters cited are contained in the English Papers. 180 Indiana Magazine of History decline in both the health and political mastery of Samuel J. Tilden in New Y~rk.~Some writers have credited other national causes such as the energy, money, and imported voters which were supposedly poured into Indiana in the closing weeks of the campaign by the Republican national committee under the direction of its secretary, Stephen W. Dorsey.‘ During the campaign, after the October election, and in the months following the November defeat, many voices in Indiana and neighboring states suggested that the failure had been due largely to the faulty operations of the Democratic State Central Committee of Indiana. This committee had operated under the chairmanship of William H. English, who was also the vice-presidential running mate of General Han- cock on the national ticket.6 The papers of English, which are available for scrutiny, provide a remarkably full picture of the policies, problems, techniques, and financial activities of the state central committee in that highly significant election year. These manuscripts and records make possible a somewhat detailed study of the committee’s operations. Such an analysis throws considerable light on the actual causes of defeat and offers a variety of interesting detail about the tools and tactics as well as the strategy and scope of a state political campaign some fourscore years ago. The electoral arithmetic of the presidential contest in 1880 was remarkably similar to that of 1876.6 The magic figure for victory was still 185 electoral votes since no new - 3 John D. Hicks, The American Nation (New York, 1955), 112; Harrison C. Thomas, The Return of the Democratic Party to Power in 1884 (Columbia University, Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, Vol. LXXXIX, No. 2, New York, 1919), 54. For a discussion of the role of Tilden and his relations with Hancock in the 1880 election see also: Alexander C. Flick, Samuel Jones Tilden, a Study in Political Sagacity (New York, l939), 443-468; Mark D. Hirsch, William C. Whitney, Modern Warwzck (New York, 1948), 153-160; Albert V. House, “Internal Conflict in Key States in the Democratic Convention of 1880,” Pennsylvania History, XXVII (April, 1960), 194-216. ‘Charles R. Lingley and Allen R. Foley, Since the Civil War (New York, 1935), 168; Herbert J. Clancy, The Presidential Election of 1880 (Chicago, 1958), 204. 6 Julian, MS Journal, 1878-1899, August 22, 1880, Julian Papers; Daniel W. Voorhees to English, February 18, 1882; Edward Campbell, Jr. to William H. Barnum, August 19, 1880; William H. Barnum to English, August 22, 1880; Edward Campbell, Jr. to English, August 25, 1880. 6 For further analysis of the continuing elements in the national political picture see House, Pennsylvania History, XXVII (April, 1960), 189-192. Democratic State Central Committee in 1880 181 states or census reapportionment had altered the total. By 1880 there was little danger that any of the southern or border states could be stolen again from the Democrats as had probably happened in Louisiana, Florida, and South Carolina in 1876. This provided the party with a basic initial advantage of 138 electoral votes practically before the contest began. The addition of New York (35) and Indiana (15) would make a total of 188 votes and victory. Tilden and Hendricks had carried these key northern states in 1876; therefore, they might be presumed to be Democratic in 1880. It is true that the picture had changed somewhat in New York, but it was thought that some truce could be worked out between the John Kelly and Samuel J. Tilden forces to enable the Democrats to achieve the necessary unity. Since Connecticut (6) was no longer considered as probably Democratic even strongly Democratic New Jersey (9), when added to the anticipated votes from New York (35), would not be sufficient. Thus, the fifteen votes of Indiana were crucial.? While a scattering of Democratic electors might be forthcoming from Nevada, Oregon, and California in the Far West, these developments could not be relied upon. Democratic managers agreed that New York and Indiana must be secured in 1880,* but victory in the Hoosier State was especially important because of its October election of state officers. Republican victory in this contest would un- doubtedly affect the psychology of the presidential campaign and breed discouragement in Democratic quarters. Usually voter support in Indiana throughout the last half of the nineteenth century was almost equally divided between the two major parties. This perhaps reflected the remarkably even cultural, economic, and regional balance within the State. For a decade and a half before 1875 Oliver P. Morton was the driving and domineering spirit and force of the Re- publicans. In the same period Thomas A. Hendricks was the strongest leader of the Democrats. Following the Civil War Indiana became a bloody political battleground with parties 7 The English Papers contain many letters from leading Democrats in Georgia, Kentucky, Iowa, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and New York in which this thesis is pounded home. See also: W. B. Beach to English, June 29, 1880; Winfield S. Hancock to English, August 6, 11, 20, 26, September 1, 13, 17, 1880. 8 Winfield S. Hancock to English, August 6, 22, 26, September 13, 1880; William H. Barnum to English, August 22, 28, 1880; W. B. Beach to EngIish, June 29, 1880. 182 Indiana Magazine of History alternating in power within the state as the result of a series of very narrow victories at the polls.o Hendricks was a formidable presidential candidate in the Democratic national conventions of 1868 and 1876. In the latter year he was nominated for the vice-presidency as the western representa- tive of the New York-midwestern alliance of the Bourbon Democrats of the North. Some easterners were not happy with this development, since by that date many of them had come to regard Hendricks as something of a renegade Bourbon because of his dalliance with inflation. But the star of Hendricks faded somewhat from the political horizon in the years 1877-1880. He made plain his resentment of Tilden’s studied failure to consult him during the campaign and electoral count of 1876-1877 by announcing that he would never again run on the old ticket of 1876.1° He felt the pressure of the Greenbackers in the Midwest and partially succumbed to their doctrines.11 He made tentative rapprochements with the Kelly forces who were fighting Tilden in New York and generally tried to solidify and expand his presidential support among all western Democrats.12 Back home in Indiana, however, some new faces were appearing in party gatherings, councils, and state 0ffi~es.l~Some of these, such as George W. Julian and Isaac P. Gray, were old Whigs or Democrats who had joined Morton in the Republican party in the Civil War era and had remained until the completion of its historic mission of antislavery had been replaced by Grantism and reactionary Bloody-Shirtism. Others, such as Governor “Blue-Jeans” Williams, of Vin- cennes, and State Treasurer William Fleming, of Fort Wayne, had worked with Hendricks for years but were now carrying party and governmental responsibilities in their own right. In the Indiana elections of 1878 the Democrats won a resounding victory after a campaign in which the Republicans 9 Stoll, History of the Indiana Democracy, 1816-1916, pp. 225-291. See also the sketches of Oliver P. Morton and Michael Kerr in William W. Woolen, Biographical and Historical Sketches of Early Indiana (Indianapolis, 1883), 130-146, 344-352. loHenry L. Watterson to Samuel J. Tilden, July 2, 1878, Manton Marble Papers (Division of Manuscripts, Library of Congress). 11Horace S. Merrill, Bourbon Democracy of the Middle West, 1865-1896 (Baton Rouge, La., 1953), 100.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Doolittle Family in America, 1856
    TheDoolittlefamilyinAmerica WilliamFrederickDoolittle,LouiseS.Brown,MalissaR.Doolittle THE DOOLITTLE F AMILY IN A MERICA (PART I V.) YCOMPILED B WILLIAM F REDERICK DOOLITTLE, M. D. Sacred d ust of our forefathers, slumber in peace! Your g raves be the shrine to which patriots wend, And swear tireless vigilance never to cease Till f reedom's long struggle with tyranny end. :" ' :,. - -' ; ., :; .—Anon. 1804 Thb S avebs ft Wa1ts Pr1nt1ng Co., Cleveland Look w here we may, the wide earth o'er, Those l ighted faces smile no more. We t read the paths their feet have worn, We s it beneath their orchard trees, We h ear, like them, the hum of bees And rustle of the bladed corn ; We turn the pages that they read, Their w ritten words we linger o'er, But in the sun they cast no shade, No voice is heard, no sign is made, No s tep is on the conscious floor! Yet Love will dream and Faith will trust (Since He who knows our need is just,) That somehow, somewhere, meet we must. Alas for him who never sees The stars shine through his cypress-trees ! Who, hopeless, lays his dead away, \Tor looks to see the breaking day \cross the mournful marbles play ! >Vho hath not learned in hours of faith, The t ruth to flesh and sense unknown, That Life is ever lord of Death, ; #..;£jtfl Love" ca:1 -nt ver lose its own! V°vOl' THE D OOLITTLE FAMILY V.PART I SIXTH G ENERATION. The l ife given us by Nature is short, but the memory of a well-spent life is eternal.
    [Show full text]
  • George Edmunds of Vermont: Republican Half-Breed
    As much as any U. S. Senator of the post-Civil War genera­ tion, George F. Edmunds represents the character, ideas, and influence of a particular wing of the Republican Party.... George Edmunds of Vermont: Republican Half-Breed By RICHARD E. WELCH, JR. AMONG the major New England politicians of the post-Civil War J-\. generation, one of the more elusive is George F. Edmunds of Vermont. A United States senator torm 1866 to 1891, he was recognized by leaders of both parties as one of the hardest workers iri the senate and perhaps its ablest constitutional lawyer. After his retirement from politics, he was a highly successful corporation lawyer, a prominent spokesman for the Anti-Imperialist movement of 1898-1900, and a family monarch until his death in 1919 at the age of ninety-one. His was a full and an active life, but it has received little attention from historians. There exists no biography of Edmunds, nor even a biographi­ cal notice later than the publication of the Dictionary of American Biography in 1931. He has faded into the shadow-land reserved for the footnote figures of American history. One reason for this is the absence of a collection of "Edmunds Papers." There is a strong correlation between the size of a man's documentary legacy and the fascination he holds for historians. Ed­ munds left orders that all his personal papers be burned upon his death, and they were. There are, of course, other possible reasons for Edmunds' neglect by the historical profession. The biographer who seeks a colorful subject would not find Edmunds attractive.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniting Mugwumps and the Masses: the Role of Puck in Gilded Age Politics, 1880-1884
    Uniting Mugwumps and the Masses: The Role of Puck in Gilded Age Politics, 1880-1884 Daniel Henry Backer McLean, Virginia B.A., University of Notre Dame, 1994 A Thesis presented to 1he Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of English University of Virginia August 1996 WARNING! The document you now hold in your hands is a feeble reproduction of an experiment in hypertext. In the waning years of the twentieth century, a crude network of computerized information centers formed a system called the Internet; one particular format of data retrieval combined text and digital images and was known as the World Wide Web. This particular project was designed for viewing through Netscape 2.0. It can be found at http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA96/PUCK/ If you are able to locate this Website, you will soon realize it is a superior resource for the presentation of such a highly visual magazine as Puck. 11 Table of Contents Introduction 1 I) A Brief History of Cartoons 5 II) Popular and Elite Political Culture 13 III) A Popular Medium 22 "Our National Dog Show" 32 "Inspecting the Democratic Curiosity Shop" 35 Caricature and the Carte-de-Viste 40 The Campaign Against Grant 42 EndNotes 51 Bibliography 54 1 wWhy can the United States not have a comic paper of its own?" enquired E.L. Godkin of The Nation, one of the most distinguished intellectual magazines of the Gilded Age. America claimed a host of popular and insightful raconteurs as its own, from Petroleum V.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Starry Banner: a Novel of the Civil War
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2004 Article 14 Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War John Benson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Benson, John (2004) "Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 6 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol6/iss3/14 Benson: Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War Review Benson, John Summer 2004 Carter, Alden R. Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War. Soho Press, Inc., $27.00 ISBN 1569473552 Way out west Battle of Stone's River retold Civil War history and fiction are rarely combined with any success. Alden R. Carter, attempts to venture where few have triumphed in Bright and Starry Banner and meets the same fate as countless other authors. Set in the shadows of the Stones River Campaign, Carter takes the reader into the minds of the Union and Confederate leaders who fought for victory in the west. Carter's principle character is Lieutenant Colonel Julius Garesche, the 41 year old chief of staff of the Union Army of the Cumberland, who begins the story with reluctant hopes as he begins service on the staff of Major General William S. Rosecrans, the army's newly appointed leader. Gradually we follow Garesche as he bears witness to a seesaw battle that develops into a stalemate, and with it, the continuing struggle. The Battle of Stones River, was fought around the Widow Smith House in Murfreesboro Tennessee from December 31, 1862 to January 2, 1863.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of the Main Characters in the Movie the Greatest Showman
    A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE MOVIE THE GREATEST SHOWMAN A PAPER BY ELVA RAHMI REG.NO: 152202024 DIPLOMA III ENGLISH DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF CULTURE STUDY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATERA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I am ELVA RAHMI, declare that I am the sole author of this paper. Except where reference is made in the text of this paper, this paper contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a paper by which I have qualified for or awarded another degree. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of this paper. This paper has not been submitted for the award of another degree in any tertiary education. Signed : ……………. Date : 2018 i UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA COPYRIGHT DECLARATION Name: ELVA RAHMI Title of Paper: A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE MOVIE THE GREATEST SHOWMAN. Qualification: D-III / Ahli Madya Study Program : English 1. I am willing that my paper should be available for reproduction at the discretion of the Libertarian of the Diploma III English Faculty of Culture Studies University of North Sumatera on the understanding that users are made aware of their obligation under law of the Republic of Indonesia. 2. I am not willing that my papers be made available for reproduction. Signed : ………….. Date : 2018 ii UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA ABSTRACT The title of this paper is DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE GREATEST SHOWMAN MOVIE. The purpose of this paper is to find the main character.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics in the Gilded Age
    Politics in the Gilded Age MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW Terms & Names Local and national political Political reforms paved the way •political machine •James A. Garfield corruption in the 19th for a more honest and efficient •graft •Chester A. Arthur century led to calls for government in the 20th century •Boss Tweed •Pendleton Civil reform. and beyond. •patronage Service Act •civil service •Grover Cleveland •Rutherford B. •Benjamin Hayes Harrison One American's Story Mark Twain described the excesses of the late 19th centu- ry in a satirical novel, The Gilded Age, a collaboration with the writer Charles Dudley Warner. The title of the book has since come to represent the period from the 1870s to the 1890s. Twain mocks the greed and self-indulgence of his characters, including Philip Sterling. A PERSONAL VOICE MARK TWAIN AND CHARLES DUDLEY WARNER “ There are many young men like him [Philip Sterling] in American society, of his age, opportunities, education and abilities, who have really been educated for nothing and have let themselves drift, in the hope that they will find somehow, and by some sudden turn of good luck, the golden road to fortune. He saw people, all around him, poor yesterday, rich to-day, who had come into sud- den opulence by some means which they could not have classified among any of the regular occupations of life.” —The Gilded Age ▼ A luxurious Twain’s characters find that getting rich quick is more difficult than they had apartment thought it would be. Investments turn out to be worthless; politicians’ bribes eat building rises up their savings.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrior for President October 7, 2003 by Dr
    Warrior for President October 7, 2003 by Dr. G. Terry Madonna and Dr. Michael Young Retired General Wesley Clarke doesn't live in Gettysburg as former President Dwight Eisenhower once did, but neither Clarke nor his supporters is going to object strenuously if you confuse him with Eisenhower in other ways. As the only professional military officer to run for the Presidency since Ike, Clarke likes the comparisons. And well he should. Successful warrior candidates, such as Eisenhower, have a special prominence in presidential electoral politics stretching back to George Washington, Andrew Jackson, and Zachary Taylor, through a bevy of Civil War officers, including Ulysses Grant and Rutherford Hayes, to modern times. Throughout its history, America has had an affinity for its warriors, electing them to high office, sometimes regardless of their political and civilian experience or ability. Military candidates don't always win, but they win often enough that their candidacy is always significant--and always taken seriously. Their credentials in combination with their standing as non-politicians make them seem ideal candidates to many. So when Wesley Clarke announced his candidacy, he immediately became a member of the gang of ten seeking the Democratic nomination. However, much more importantly, he also became a category of one-- alone in the field as a member of the professional warrior class. And the reaction to him as a candidate is very similar to the reaction earlier warriors have generated. Much, for example, has been made about his political inexperience, his issue inconsistency, his unfamiliarity with domestic issues, and his general lack of experience outside the military.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    912 Biographical Directory to California in 1877 and established a wholesale fruit and D commission business; was a member of the National Guard of California, and subsequently assisted in the organization DADDARIO, Emilio Quincy, a Representative from of the Coast Guard, of which he later became brigadier Connecticut; born in Newton Center, Suffolk County, Mass., general in command of the Second Brigade; elected as a September 24, 1918; attended the public schools in Boston, Republican to the Fifty-second Congress (March 4, 1891- Mass., Tilton (N.H.) Academy, and Newton (Mass.) Country March 3, 1893); declined to be a candidate for renomination Day School; graduated from Wesleyan University, Middle- in 1892; in 1894 settled in New York City, where he became town, Conn., in 1939; attended Boston University Law interested in the automobile industry; retired to Westport, School 1939-1941; transferred to University of Connecticut N.Y., in 1907; died in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November and graduated in 1942; was admitted to the bar in Con- 24, 1911; interment in Hillside Cemetery, Westport, N.Y. necticut and Massachusetts in 1942 and commenced the practice of law in Middletown, Conn.; in February 1943 en- CUTTS, Charles, a Senator from New Hampshire; born listed as a private in the United States Army; assigned in Portsmouth, N.H., January 31, 1769; graduated from Har- to the Office of Strategic Services at Fort Meade, Md.; served vard University in 1789; studied law; admitted to the bar overseas in the Mediterranean Theater; was separated
    [Show full text]
  • Union Generals Ambrose Everett Burnside (1824-1881) Poore, Benjamin
    Union Generals Ambrose Everett Burnside (1824-1881) Poore, Benjamin. The Life and Public Services of Ambrose E. Burnside. Providence, Rhode Island: J.A. & R.A. Reid, 1882. E B967p Woodbury, Augustus. Major General Ambrose E. Burnside and the Ninth Army Corps. Providence: S.S. Rider & Brother, 1867. F834 P86.9 W884 David Glasgow Farragut (1801-1870) Duffy, James P. Lincoln’s Admiral: The Civil War Campaigns of David Farragut. New York: Wiley, 1997. E F2393d Farragut, Loyall. The Life of David Glasgow Farragut, First Admiral of the United States Navy, Embodying his Journal and Letters. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1879. E F2393f Hill, Jim Dan. Sea Dogs of the Sixties: Farragut and Seven Contemporaries. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1935. F8347 H646s Lewis, Charles Lee. David Glasgow Farragut. Annapolis: United States Naval Institute, 1941- 43. E F2393L Mahan, A.T. Admiral Farragut. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1897. E F2393m Andrew Hull Foote (1806-1863) Hoppins, J. M. Life of Andrew Hull Foote, Rear-Admiral United States Navy. New York: Harper & Bros., 1874. E F688h Ulysses Simpson Grant (1822-1885) Catton, Bruce. Grant Moves South. Boston: Little, Brown, 1988, c1960. F896.3 G76cat2 1988 Catton, Bruce. Grant Takes Command. Boston: Little, Brown, 1969. F896.3 G76cat3 1990 Grant, Ulysses S. Memoirs and Selected Letters: Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant, Selected Letters 1839-1865. New York: Library of America, 1990. F896.3 G759p 1990 Lewis, Lloyd. Captain Sam Grant. Boston: Little, Brown, 1950. F896.3 G76Le McFeely, William S. Grant: A Biography. New York: Norton, 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unitary Executive During the Second Half-Century
    THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE SECOND HALF-CENTURY * STEVEN G. CALABRESI ** CHRISTOPHER S. YOO I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................668 II. THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE JACKSONIAN PERIOD, 1837-1861 .........................669 A. Martin Van Buren .................................................670 B. William H. Harrison ..............................................678 C. John Tyler...............................................................682 D. James K. Polk..........................................................688 E. Zachary Taylor.......................................................694 F. Millard Fillmore.....................................................698 G. Franklin Pierce.......................................................704 H. James Buchanan .....................................................709 III. THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE CIVIL WAR, 1861-1869 ..................................717 A. Abraham Lincoln....................................................718 B. Andrew Johnson.....................................................737 C. The Tenure of Office Act and the Impeachment of Andrew Johnson .................................................746 IV. THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE DURING THE GILDED AGE, 1869-1889................................759 A. Ulysses S. Grant ....................................................759 B. Rutherford B. Hayes...............................................769 C. James A. Garfield....................................................780 D. Chester
    [Show full text]
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009
    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]