DOCSLIB.ORG

Veja a Lista Das Espécies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Veja a Lista Das Espécies FAMÍLIA ESPÉCIE Allophrynidae Allophryne ruthveni Gaige, 1926 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates bacurau Simões, 2016 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates brunneus (Cope, 1887) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates caeruleodactylus (Lima & Caldwell, 2001) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates conspicuus (Morales, 2002 "2000") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates crombiei ( Morales, 2002 "2000") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates femoralis (Boulenger, 1884 "1883") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates flaviventris Melo-Sampaio, Souza & Peloso, 2013 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates fuscellus (Morales, 2002"2000") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates gasconi (Morales, 2002"2000") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates goianus (Bokermann, 1975) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates grillisimilis Simões, Sturaro, Peloso & Lima, 2013 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates hodli Simões, Lima & Farias, 2010 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates magnussoni Lima, Simões & Kaefer, 2014 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates marchesianus (Melin, 1941) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates masniger (Morales, 2002"2000") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates myersi (Pyburn, 1981) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates nidicola (Caldwell & Lima, 2003) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates olfersioides (A. Lutz, 1925) Allobates paleovarzensis Lima, Caldwell, Biavati & Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Montanarin, 2010 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates spumaponens Kok & Ernt, 2007 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates subfolionidificans (Lima, Sanchez & Souza, 2007) Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates sumtuosus (Morales, 2002"2000") Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates tapajos Lima, Simões & Kaefer, 2015 Aromobatidae (Allobatinae) Allobates vanzolinius (Morales, 2002"2000") Anomaloglossus apiau Fouquet, Souza, Nunes, Kok, Curcio, Aromobatidae (Aromobatinae) Carvalho, Grant & Rodrigues, 2015 Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus (Boistel & de Massari, Aromobatidae (Aromobatinae) 1999) Aromobatidae (Aromobatinae) Anomaloglossus roraima (La Marca, 1998) Aromobatidae (Aromobatinae) Anomaloglossus stepheni (Martins, 1989) Aromobatidae (Aromobatinae) Anomaloglossus tamacuarensis (Myers & Donelly, 1997) Anomaloglossus tepequem Fouquet, Orrico, Ernst, Blanc, Aromobatidae (Aromobatinae) Martinez, Vasher, Rodrigues, Ouboter, Jairam & Ron, 2015 Brachycephalidae Ischnocnema juipoca (Sazima & Cardoso, 1978) Brachycephalidae Ischnocnema karst Canedo, Targino, Leite & Haddad, 2012 Ischnocnema penaxavantinho Giaretta, Toffoli & Oliveira, Brachycephalidae 2007 Bufonidae Amazophrynella bokermanni (Izecksohn, 1994 "1993") Amazophrynella manaos Rojas, Carvalho, Gordo, Ávila, Bufonidae Farias & Hrbek, 2014 Bufonidae Amazophrynella minuta (Melin, 1941) Amazophrynella vote Ávila, Carvalho, Gordo, Kawashita- Bufonidae Ribeiro & Morais, 2012 Bufonidae Atelopus flavescens Duméril & Bibron, 1841 Bufonidae Atelopus franciscus Lescure, 1974 Bufonidae Atelopus hoogmoedi Lescure, 1974 Bufonidae Atelopus spumarius Cope, 1871 Bufonidae Melanophryniscus fulvoguttatus (Mertens, 1937) Bufonidae Melanophryniscus klappenbachi Prigioni & Langone, 2000 Bufonidae Oreophrynella quelchii Boulenger, 1895 Oreophrynella weiassipuensis Señaris, Nascimento & Bufonidae Villarreal, 2005 Rhaebo ecuadorensis Mueses-Cisneros, Cisneros-Heredia & Bufonidae Mcdiarmid, 2012 Bufonidae Rhaebo guttatus (Schneider, 1799) Bufonidae Rhinella acutirostris (Spix, 1824) Bufonidae Rhinella azarai (Gallardo, 1965) Bufonidae Rhinella bergi (Céspedez, 2000 "1999") Bufonidae Rhinella castaneotica (Caldwell, 1991) Bufonidae Rhinella ceratophrys (Boulenger, 1882) Rhinella cerradensis Maciel, Brandão, Campos & Sebben, Bufonidae 2007 Bufonidae Rhinella dapsilis (Myers & Carvalho, 1945) Bufonidae Rhinella gildae Vaz-Silva, Maciel, Bastos & Pombal, 2015 Bufonidae Rhinella granulosa (Spix, 1824) Bufonidae Rhinella inopina Vaz-Silva, Valdujo & Pombal, 2012 Bufonidae Rhinella magnussoni Lima, Menin & Araújo, 2007 Bufonidae Rhinella major (Muller & Helmich, 1936) Bufonidae Rhinella margaritifera (Laurenti, 1768) Bufonidae Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758) Rhinella martyi Fouquet, Gaucher, Blanc & Vélez- Bufonidae Rodriguez, 2007 Bufonidae Rhinella merianae Gallardo, 1965 Bufonidae Rhinella mirandaribeiroi (Gallardo, 1965) Bufonidae Rhinella nattereri Bokermann, 1967 Bufonidae Rhinella ocellata (Günther, 1859 "1858") Rhinella paraguayensis Ávila, Pansonato & Strüssmann, Bufonidae 2010 Bufonidae Rhinella proboscidea (Spix, 1824) Bufonidae Rhinella roqueana (Melin, 1941) Bufonidae Rhinella rubescens (A. Lutz, 1925) Bufonidae Rhinella schneideri (Werner, 1894) Bufonidae Rhinella scitula (Caramaschi & Niemeyer, 2003) Bufonidae Rhinella sebbeni Vaz-Silva, Maciel, Bastos & Pombal, 2015 Bufonidae Rhinella veredas (Brandão, Maciel & Sebben, 2007) Caeciliidae Caecilia armata Dunn, 1942 Caeciliidae Caecilia gracilis Shaw, 1802 Caeciliidae Caecilia marcusi Wake, 1985 Caeciliidae Caecilia mertensi Taylor, 1973 Caeciliidae Caecilia tentaculata Linnaeus, 1758 Centrolenidae (Centroleninae) Teratohyla adenocheira Harvey & Nooan, 2005 Centrolenidae (Centroleninae) Teratohyla midas (Lynch & Duellman, 1973) Centrolenidae (Centroleninae) Vitreorana franciscana Santana, Barros, Pontes & Feio, 2015 Centrolenidae (Centroleninae) Vitreorana oyampiensis (Lescure, 1975) Centrolenidae (Centroleninae) Vitreorana ritae (B. Lutz in B. Lutz & Kloss, 1952) Centrolenidae (Hyalinobatrachinae) Hyalinobatrachium cappellei (van Lidth de Jeude, 1904) Hyalinobatrachium carlesvilai Castroviejo-Fisher, Padial, Centrolenidae (Hyalinobatrachinae) Chaparro, Aguayo & De la Riva, 2009 Centrolenidae (Hyalinobatrachinae) Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (Ayarzaqüena, 1992) Centrolenidae (Hyalinobatrachinae) Hyalinobatrachium mondolfii Señaris & Ayarzaguena, 2001 Centrolenidae (Hyalinobatrachinae) Hyalinonatrachium munozorum (Lynch & Duellman, 1973) Ceratophryidae Ceratophrys cornuta (Linnaeus, 1758) Ceratophryidae Ceratophrys cranwelli Barrio, 1980 Ceratophryidae Lepidobatrachus asper (Budgett, 1899) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Ceuthomantis caverniba rdus (Myers & Donnelly, 1997) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis academicus Lehr, Moravec & Urrutia, 2010 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis achuar Elmer & Cannatella, 2008 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis acuminatus (Schreve, 1935) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis altamazonicus (Barbour & Dunn, 1921) Pristimantis aureolineatus Guayasamin, Ron, Cisneros- Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Heredia, Lamar & McCracken, 2006 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis aureoventris Kok, Means & Bossuyt, 2011 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis buccinator (Rodriguez, 1994) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis carvalhoi (Lutz in Lutz & Kloss, 1952) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis chiastonotus (Lynch & Hoogmoed, 1977) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis conspicillatus (Günther, 1858) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis delius (Duellman & Mendelson, 1995) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis diadematus (Jiménez de la Espada, 1875) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis dundeei (Heyer & Muñoz, 1999) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis eurydactylus (Hedges & Schlüter, 1992) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis fenestratus (Steindachner, 1864) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis gutturalis (Hoogmoed, Lynch & Lescure, 1977) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis inguinalis (Parker, 1940) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis lacrimosus (Jiménez de la Espada, 1875) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis lanthanites (Lynch, 1975) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis malkini (Lynch, 1980) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis marmoratus (Boulenger, 1900) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis martiae (Lynch, 1974) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis memorans (Myers & Donelly, 1997) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis ockendeni (Boulenger, 1912) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis orcus Lehr, Catenazzi & Rodriguez, 2009 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis peruvianus (Melin, 1941) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis reichlei Padial & de La Riva, 2009 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis skydmainos (Flores & Rodriguez, 1997) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis toftae (Duellman, 1978) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis variabilis (Lynch, 1968) Pristimantis ventrigranulosus Maciel, Vaz-Silva, de Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Oliveira & Padial, 2012 Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis ventrimarmoratus (Boulenger, 1912) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis vilarsi (Melin, 1941) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis zeuctotylus (Lynch & Hoogmoed, 1977) Craugastoridae (Ceuthomantinae) Pristimantis zimmermanae (Heyer & Hardy, 1991) Craugastoridae (Craugastorinae) Strabomantis sulcatus (Cope, 1874) Craugastoridae (Holoadeninae) Barycholos ternetzi (Miranda Ribeiro, 1937) Craugastoridae (Holoadeninae) Noblella myrmecoides (Lynch, 1976) Craugastoridae (Holoadeninae) Oreobates crepitans (Bokermann, 1965) Craugastoridae (Holoadeninae) Oreobates heterodactylus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937) Craugastoridae (Holoadeninae) Oreobates quixensis Jiménez de la Espada, 1872 Oreobates remotus Teixeira, Amaro, Recoder, Sena & Craugastoridae (Holoadeninae) Rodrigues, 2012 Cycloramphidae Thoropa megatympanum Caramaschi & Sazima, 1984 Dendrobatidae (Colostethinae) Ameerega berohoka Vaz-Silva & Maciel, 2011 Dendrobatidae (Colostethinae)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of the Toads Rhinella Rubescens (Lutz, 1925) and R
    Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 1137-1139 (2021) (published online on 20 August 2021) Interaction of the toads Rhinella rubescens (Lutz, 1925) and R. diptycha (Cope, 1862) with artificial road lights in central Brazil Leonardo P. Fraga1,* and Helga C. Wiederhecker2 The impact of roads on biodiversity starts with In Brazil, the genus Rhinella is represented by 40 habitat destruction, persists through time, and might species (Segalla et al., 2019). Among them, species of the be aggravated by traffic and road characteristics R. marina group (sensu Pramuk, 2006) present cranial (Trombulak and Frissell, 2000; Coffin, 2007). Species crests and distinctive, large parotoid glands (Maciel characteristics may also play an important role, and et al., 2007; Pramuk et al., 2008). In Brasília, Distrito studies contemplating terrestrial vertebrates have Federal, Brazil, the R. marina group is represented by revealed amphibians as particularly vulnerable to three species: R. diptycha (Cope, 1862), R. rubescens traffic (Glista et al., 2007; Healey et al., 2020). Among (Lutz, 1925), and R. cerradensis Maciel et al., 2007 anurans, species that perform massive seasonal (Vaz-Silva et al., 2020). Despite their conspicuous size, migrations for resources, such as food and reproductive information regarding the interaction of these species sites, are particularly affected by traffic (Elzanowski with roads and artificial lights are scarce. Here we et al., 2009; Langen et al., 2009; Beebee, 2013). report on the interaction of individuals of two species of Additionally, some road structures, such as manholes, the R. marina group with the headlights of a car. drains, and basins, can accumulate rainwater, creating The interaction occurred on the 17 November 2019 at temporary bodies of water that attract anurans (Le Viol 19:30 h on a rural road (5 m wide) east of Santa Maria, et al., 2012; Cunnington et al., 2014; Sterrett et al., Distrito Federal, Brazil (16.0082°S, 47.8886°W).
    [Show full text]
  • The Tadpole of Adelphobates Galactonotus (Steindachner, 1864) (Amphibia, Anura, Dendrobatidae)
    Zootaxa 4422 (2): 287–290 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4422.2.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C16E5D1D-D75C-4411-94AE-41C038CA7BA9 The tadpole of Adelphobates galactonotus (Steindachner, 1864) (Amphibia, Anura, Dendrobatidae) DANUSY LOPES SANTOS1,2, 3, SILIONAMÃ PEREIRA DANTAS4 & FAUSTO NOMURA1 1Laboratório de Herpetologia e Comportamento Animal, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás. Campus Samambaia, CEP 74001-970, Goiânia, GO, Brazil 2Laboratório de Ecologia Teórica, Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus São José do Rio Preto. CEP 15054-000, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil 4Universidade Federal de Tocantins, Campus Araguaína, CEP 77838-824, Araguaína, TO, Brazil 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The systematics of the dart-poison frogs, family Dendrobatidae, experienced several taxonomic rearrangements over time (e.g., Grant et al. 2006, 2017; Brown et al. 2011). Currently, this family comprises 194 described species organized in three sub-families and 15 genera (Frost 2018). Among them, the genus Adelphobates Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel, & Wheeler, 2006, comprises three species, all distributed in Central and lower Amazon drainage of Peru and Brazil, and possibly in northeast of Bolivia (Grant et al. 2006; Frost 2018). Adelphobates galactonotus (Steindachner 1864) is an endemic Brazilian frog, and can be found throughout Pará, Maranhão, Mato Grosso and Tocantins states (Hoogmoed & Avila-Pires 2012), related to Amazon forest formations and also in transitional areas between the Cerrado and the Amazon forest (Valdujo et al.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Uncertain Taxonomic Identity of Adenomera Hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868) and the Composite Type Series of A
    Copeia 107, No. 4, 2019, 708–723 On the Uncertain Taxonomic Identity of Adenomera hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868) and the Composite Type Series of A. andreae (Muller,¨ 1923) (Anura, Leptodactylidae) Thiago R. de Carvalho1, Ariovaldo A. Giaretta2, Natan M. Maciel3, Diego A. Barrera4,Cesar´ Aguilar-Puntriano4,5,Celio´ F. B. Haddad1, Marcelo N. C. Kokubum6, Marcelo Menin7, and Ariadne Angulo4,5 Adenomera andreae and A. hylaedactyla are two widespread Amazonian frogs that have been traditionally distinguished from each other by the use of different habitats, toe tip development, and more recently through advertisement calls. Yet, taxonomic identification of these species has always been challenging. Herein we undertake a review of type specimens and include new phenotypic (morphology and vocalization) and mitochondrial DNA information for an updated diagnosis of both species. Our morphological analysis indicates that the single type (holotype) of A. hylaedactyla could either belong to lineages associated with Amazonian forest-dwelling species (A. andreae clade) or to the open-formation morphotype (A. hylaedactyla clade). Given the holotype’s poor preservation, leading to the ambiguous assignment of character states for toe tip development, as well as a vague type locality encompassing a vast area in eastern Ecuador and northern Peru, the identity of this specimen is uncertain. Morphology of toe tip fragments and the original species description suggest that A. hylaedactyla could correspond to at least two described species (A. andreae or A. simonstuarti) or additional unnamed genetic lineages of the A. andreae clade, all bearing toe tips expanded into discs. Analysis of morphometric data, however, clustered the holotype with the Amazonian open-formation morphotype (toe tips unexpanded).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Natural History Is It All Death Feigning? Case in Anurans
    This article was downloaded by: [Toledo, Luís Felipe] On: 9 July 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 924058002] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Natural History Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713192031 Is it all death feigning? Case in anurans Luís Felipe Toledoa; Ivan Sazimaa; Célio F. B. Haddadb a Museu de Zoologia “Prof. Adão José Cardoso”, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil b Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Unesp, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil Online publication date: 08 July 2010 To cite this Article Toledo, Luís Felipe , Sazima, Ivan and Haddad, Célio F. B.(2010) 'Is it all death feigning? Case in anurans', Journal of Natural History, 44: 31, 1979 — 1988 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/00222931003624804 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222931003624804 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Restriction Fragment Analysis of the Ribosomal DNA of Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys Species (Anura, Leptodactylidae)
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 26, 2, 139-143 (2003) Copyright by the Brazilian Society of Genetics. Printed in Brazil www.sbg.org.br Research Article Restriction fragment analysis of the ribosomal DNA of Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys species (Anura, Leptodactylidae) Luciana B. Lourenço1, Paulo C.A. Garcia2 and Shirlei M. Recco-Pimentel1 1Departamento de Biologia Celular, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil. 2Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. Abstract Physical maps of the ribosomal RNA gene 28S of species belonging to the genera Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys were constructed, using five restriction endonucleases. The restriction sites for Bam HI, Bgl II, Bst EII, and Eco RI had similar positions in all species, although there were interspecific differences in the size of the restriction fragments obtained. An additional Pvu II site was found in Scythrophrys specimens from Piraquara (State of Paraná, Brazil) and from São Bento do Sul (State of Santa Catarina, Brazil), but not in the Scythrophrys specimens from Rancho Queimado (State of Santa Catarina, Brazil). This finding is in agreement with the hypothesis regarding the existence of two species in the genus Scythrophrys. On the other hand, the extra Bst EII site considered in the literature to be a synapomorphy for the subfamilies Leptodactylinae and Telmatobiinae was not observed in the genera Paratelmatobius and Scythrophrys, which brings new questions about some taxonomic classifications that include Paratelmatobius in Leptodactylinae and Scythrophrys in Telmatobiinae. Interspecific variation was observed in the size of the restriction fragments analyzed and, in the case of group I Scythrophrys, there was also a variation between the individuals of the two populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Adventure-Wildlife in the Film List 3D
    Wildlife Featured in the Film Amazon Adventure immerses audiences right into the biodiverse rainforest. The following is a list of the scientic names with photos of over 70 dierent species that appear in the lm in chronological order. Henry Bates' fascinating 11-year exploration through the perilous Amazon jungle shows him in constant contact with the wildlife inhabiting these visually stunning ecosystems. Everything from the smallest beetle crawling along the forest oor to the immense trees creating a canopy above, Bates wanted to examine it all. Things are not always what they seem as Bates discovered many astounding examples of camouage and mimicry. He also collected over 14, 500 dierent species while in the Amazon and 8, 000 new to science. Assorted Buttery Boxes appearing in various scenes Common: Leaf Mantis or Hooded Mantis throughout lm (Stevens' shop, Bates' collections, etc) Scientific: Choeradodis rhomboidea Common: Brazil Stick Mantis Common: Katydid Insect Scientific: Brunneria brasiliensis Scientific: Typophyllum lunatum Common: Turnip-Tailed Gecko Common: Leaf Moth Scientific: Thecadactylus rapicauda Scientific: Zaretis isidora 1 Common: Great Potoo Common: Ground Beetle Scientific: Nyctibius grandis Scientific: Abax parallelepipedus Common: Acorn Weevil 400+ Specimens of butteries, shells, plants, birds, Scientific: Curculio glandium reptiles, sh, mammals, etc. in Stevens' Shop Common: Hercules Beetle Common: Blue Morpho Buttery Scientific: Dynastes hercules Scientific: Morpho deidamia Common: White Arctic Hare Common:
    [Show full text]
  • Etar a Área De Distribuição Geográfica De Anfíbios Na Amazônia
    Universidade Federal do Amapá Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Tropical Mestrado e Doutorado UNIFAP / EMBRAPA-AP / IEPA / CI-Brasil YURI BRENO DA SILVA E SILVA COMO A EXPANSÃO DE HIDRELÉTRICAS, PERDA FLORESTAL E MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS AMEAÇAM A ÁREA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DE ANFÍBIOS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA MACAPÁ, AP 2017 YURI BRENO DA SILVA E SILVA COMO A EXPANSÃO DE HIDRE LÉTRICAS, PERDA FLORESTAL E MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS AMEAÇAM A ÁREA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DE ANFÍBIOS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Tropical (PPGBIO) da Universidade Federal do Amapá, como requisito parcial à obtenção do título de Mestre em Biodiversidade Tropical. Orientador: Dra. Fernanda Michalski Co-Orientador: Dr. Rafael Loyola MACAPÁ, AP 2017 YURI BRENO DA SILVA E SILVA COMO A EXPANSÃO DE HIDRELÉTRICAS, PERDA FLORESTAL E MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS AMEAÇAM A ÁREA DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DE ANFÍBIOS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA _________________________________________ Dra. Fernanda Michalski Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) _________________________________________ Dr. Rafael Loyola Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) ____________________________________________ Alexandro Cezar Florentino Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) ____________________________________________ Admilson Moreira Torres Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá (IEPA) Aprovada em de de , Macapá, AP, Brasil À minha família, meus amigos, meu amor e ao meu pequeno Sebastião. AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço a CAPES pela conceção de uma bolsa durante os dois anos de mestrado, ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Tropical (PPGBio) pelo apoio logístico durante a pesquisa realizada. Obrigado aos professores do PPGBio por todo o conhecimento compartilhado. Agradeço aos Doutores, membros da banca avaliadora, pelas críticas e contribuições construtivas ao trabalho.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTÓRIA NATURAL DE Rhinella Pygmaea (MYERS & CARVALHO, 1952), ESPÉCIE ENDÊMICA DA MATA ATLÂNTICA DO SUDESTE BRASILEIRO
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE FLUMINENSE DARCY RIBEIRO CAIO ANTÔNIO FIGUEIREDO DE ANDRADE HISTÓRIA NATURAL DE Rhinella pygmaea (MYERS & CARVALHO, 1952), ESPÉCIE ENDÊMICA DA MATA ATLÂNTICA DO SUDESTE BRASILEIRO Campos dos Goytacazes 2017 ii CAIO ANTÔNIO FIGUEIREDO DE ANDRADE HISTÓRIA NATURAL DE Rhinella pygmaea (MYERS & CARVALHO, 1952), ESPÉCIE ENDÊMICA DA MATA ATLÂNTICA DO SUDESTE BRASILEIRO Tese apresentada ao Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Ciência Animal, na Área de Concentração de Sanidade Animal e Linha de Pesquisa de Morfologia e Patologia Animal. ORIENTADOR: Prof. Dr. Leonardo Serafim da Silveira Campos dos Goytacazes 2017 iii CAIO ANTÔNIO FIGUEIREDO DE ANDRADE HISTÓRIA NATURAL DE Rhinella pygmaea (MYERS & CARVALHO, 1952), ESPÉCIE ENDÊMICA DA MATA ATLÂNTICA DO SUDESTE BRASILEIRO Tese apresentada ao Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Ciência Animal, na Área de Concentração de Sanidade Animal e Linha de Pesquisa de Morfologia e Patologia Animal. Aprovada em 06 de abril de 2017 BANCA EXAMINADORA ___________________________________________________________________ Ana Maria Paulino Telles de Carvalho e Silva (Doutora, Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia)) - UNIRIO ___________________________________________________________________ Sergio Potsch de Carvalho e Silva (Doutor, Ciências
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Amphibians Found in the Amazonian Savanna of the Rio
    Biota Neotropica ISSN: 1676-0611 [email protected] Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Brasil Reis Ferreira Lima, Janaina; Dias Lima, Jucivaldo; Dias Lima, Soraia; Borja Lima Silva, Raullyan; Vasconcellos de Andrade, Gilda Amphibians found in the Amazonian Savanna of the Rio Curiaú Environmental Protection Area in Amapá, Brazil Biota Neotropica, vol. 17, núm. 2, 2017, pp. 1-10 Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Campinas, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199152368003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biota Neotropica 17(2): e20160252, 2017 ISSN 1676-0611 (online edition) inventory Amphibians found in the Amazonian Savanna of the Rio Curiaú Environmental Protection Area in Amapá, Brazil Janaina Reis Ferreira Lima1,2, Jucivaldo Dias Lima1,2, Soraia Dias Lima2, Raullyan Borja Lima Silva2 & Gilda Vasconcellos de Andrade3 1Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Rede BIONORTE, Programa de Pós‑graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia, Macapá, AP, Brazil 2Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil 3Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Departamento de Biologia, São Luís, MA, Brazil *Corresponding author: Janaina Reis Ferreira Lima, e‑mail: [email protected] LIMA, J. R. F., LIMA, J. D., LIMA, S. D., SILVA, R. B. L., ANDRADE, G. V. Amphibians found in the Amazonian Savanna of the Rio Curiaú Environmental Protection Area in Amapá, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 17(2): e20160252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2016-0252 Abstract: Amphibian research has grown steadily in recent years in the Amazon region, especially in the Brazilian states of Amazonas, Pará, Rondônia, and Amapá, and neighboring areas of the Guiana Shield.
    [Show full text]
  • Foam Nest Construction and First Report of Agonistic Behaviour In
    Neotropical Biology and Conservation 14(1): 117–128 (2019) doi: 10.3897/neotropical.14.e34841 SHORT COMMUNICATION Foam nest construction and first report of agonistic behaviour in Pleurodema tucumanum (Anura, Leptodactylidae) Melina J. Rodriguez Muñoz1,2, Tomás A. Martínez1,2, Juan Carlos Acosta1, Graciela M. Blanco1 1 Gabinete DIBIOVA (Diversidad y Biología de Vertebrados del Árido). Departamento de Biología, FCEFN, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Avenida Ignacio de la Roza 590, Rivadavia J5400DCS, San Juan, Argentina 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Godoy Cruz 2290, C1425FQB, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina Corresponding author: Melina J. Rodriguez Muñoz ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. M. Leal-Zanchet | Received 21 May 2018 | Accepted 27 December 2018 | Published 11 April 2019 Citation: Rodriguez Muñoz MJ, Martínez TA, Acosta JC, Blanco GM (2019) Foam nest construction and first report of agonistic behaviour in Pleurodema tucumanum (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 14(1): 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.14.e34841 Abstract Reproductive strategies are the combination of physiological, morphological, and behavioural traits interacting to increase species reproductive success within a set of environmental conditions. While the reproductive strategies of Leiuperinae are known, few studies have been conducted regarding the reproductive behaviour that underlies them. The aim of this study was to document the structural characteristics of nesting microsites, to describe the process of foam nest construction, and to explore the presence of male agonistic and chorus behaviour in Pleurodema tucumanum. Nests were found close to the edge of a temporary pond and the mean temperature of the foam nests was always close to the mean temperature of the pond water.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Analysis of Five Brazilian
    c Indian Academy of Sciences RESEARCH ARTICLE Chromosome analysis of five Brazilian species of poison frogs (Anura: Dendrobatidae) PAULA CAMARGO RODRIGUES1, ODAIR AGUIAR2, FLÁVIA SERPIERI1, ALBERTINA PIMENTEL LIMA3, MASAO UETANEBARO4 and SHIRLEI MARIA RECCO-PIMENTEL1∗ 1Departamento de Anatomia, Biologia Celular e Fisiologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-863 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 2Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Campus Baixada Santista, 11060-001 Santos, São Paulo, Brazil 3Coordenadoria de Pesquisas em Ecologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas do Amazonas, 69011-970 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil 4Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 70070-900 Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil Abstract Dendrobatid frogs have undergone an extensive systematic reorganization based on recent molecular findings. The present work describes karyotypes of the Brazilian species Adelphobates castaneoticus, A. quinquevittatus, Ameerega picta, A. galactonotus and Dendrobates tinctorius which were compared to each other and with previously described related species. All karyotypes consisted of 2n = 18 chromosomes, except for A. picta which had 2n = 24. The karyotypes of the Adelphobates and D. tinctorius species were highly similar to each other and to the other 2n = 18 previously studied species, revealing conserved karyotypic characteristics in both genera. In recent phylogenetic studies, all Adelphobates species were grouped in a clade separated from the Dendrobates species. Thus, we hypothesized that their common karyotypic traits may have a distinct origin by chromosome rearrangements and mutations. In A. picta, with 2n = 24, chromosome features of pairs from 1 to 8 are shared with other previously karyotyped species within this genus. Hence, the A.
    [Show full text]