DOCSLIB.ORG

SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies (Sitcos) Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor Report: Technical Annex, Volume 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies (Sitcos) Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor Report: Technical Annex, Volume 2 in association with SESTRAN SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies (SITCoS) Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor Report: Technical Annex, Volume 2 June 2005 SITCoS SESTRAN INTEGRATED TRANSPORT CORRIDOR STUDIES QUEENSFERRY CROSS FORTH CORRIDOR STAG APPRAISAL – TECHNICAL ANNEX Volume 2: Consultation & Part 2 Appraisal Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND........................................................................ 1 2. CONSULTATION.......................................................................................................... 4 3. STAG PART 2 (DETAILED) APPRAISAL .............................................................. 23 4. RISK & UNCERTAINTY.......................................................................................... 118 5. MONITORING & EVALUATION .......................................................................... 123 6. OTHER ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED ................................................................ 130 7. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................... 148 APPENDICES A BUS PRIORITY SCHEMES CONSIDERED B RAIL IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS C TRANSPORT LAND-USE INTEGRATION ASSESSMENT D TRANSPORT ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY TABLES E EXPLANATION OF ACCDNT MODEL F OUTLINE PLANS FOR INTERCHANGES G TRAFFIC FLOWS INTO CENTRAL EDINBURGH SITCoS SESTRAN INTEGRATED TRANSPORT CORRIDOR STUDIES QUEENSFERRY CROSS FORTH CORRIDOR STAG APPRAISAL – TECHNICAL ANNEX Volume 2: Consultation & Part 2 Appraisal Document Control Project Title: SITCoS (Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor) JEN Code: S100307/0003 Document Type: Technical Annex to Final Report Document Status: Final Quality Control QA Status: Scott Wilson QA Procedures, BS EN ISO 9001:2000 Authors: Neill Birch, David Connolly, Ruth Bryan, Steven Harding Checked By: Bill Allanson Approved By: Bill Allanson Date of Issue: 2nd June 2005 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies - SITCoS Queensferry – Cross Forth Corridor Final Report – Technical Annex (Volume 2) 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 The SESTRANS partners appointed a consortium of consultants led by MVA and including Scott Wilson Scotland Ltd, David Simmonds Consultancy, Hargest & Wallace Planning Ltd and Systra Ltd to undertake Integrated Transport Corridor Studies on five corridors around Edinburgh and the Forth Valley. 1.1.2 This Report refers to the Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor. The extent of the Study area for this Corridor is shown on Figure 1.1, but it should be noted that the scope of the Study requires consideration of people, freight and vehicle movements starting or finishing outwith the Study area, but travelling across the Forth Estuary at Queensferry. 1.1.3 The approach for the overall Study was discussed at Inception Meetings on 29th September and 24th October 2003, and confirmed in the Inception Report dated 20th October 2003. 1.1.4 To supplement the overall Study inception meetings, specific “start-up” meetings took place on 10th November 2003 with officers of Fife Council and the Forth Estuary Transport Authority (FETA), records of which are shown in Volume 1 (Appendix A). 1.1.5 Throughout the study there was a need to liaise closely with FETA who were in the process of developing their Local Transport Strategy. 1.2 Report Structure 1.2.1 The general process of producing the Corridor Report is set out in Figure 1.2 below. STAG recommends that reports should consider their principal audience as the public1. Nevertheless there is a requirement to provide a wealth of supporting detail, and in a corridor of this size and complexity this detail might be said to be in danger of obscuring the principal issues and potential solutions. Accordingly a brief summary report is being presented, focusing very much on the lay reader, with a more detailed supporting Technical Annex. 1 Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (Scottish Executive, September 2003), section 14.1.3 SITCoS Queensferry Cross Forth Page 1 MVA / Scott Wilson STAG2 Report v4.0 June 2005 SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies - SITCoS Queensferry – Cross Forth Corridor Final Report – Technical Annex (Volume 2) Figure 1.2: Structure of Study Reporting SITCoS: Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor Progress from Optioneering to STAG2 Optioneering Sifting Package Costing Modelling (Technical Note 1) (Technical Note 2) STAG1 Transport Economic (excluding Economic Appraisal) Efficiency (TEE) Initial Options Report (Draft excluding Consultation with Corridor SteeringGroup Economic Appraisal Economic Appraisal) (Technical Note 4) Complete STAG1 ASTs and Identify Schemes for STAG2 (Technical Note 5) Complete STAG1 Process Complete Initial Options Report Stakeholder Consultation Environmental Safety Provide input to Development & Appraisal of Economy FETA LTS Emerging Schemes (Technical Note 6) Integration Accessibility & Social Refine Options Inclusion Cost to Government Steering Group STAG2 Appraisal and ASTs Risk & Uncertainty Consultation with Provide input into Complete SITCoS Study Report Corridor Report SITCoS Queensferry Cross Forth Page 2 MVA / Scott Wilson STAG2 Report v4.0 June 2005 SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies - SITCoS Queensferry – Cross Forth Corridor Final Report – Technical Annex (Volume 2) 1.2.2 This document forms Volume 2 of the Technical Annex, and covers the comprehensive consultation on the schemes taken forward from Part 1 as well as the more detailed Part 2 Appraisal of those schemes. It is structured as follows: Chapter 2 Describes the consultation process, particularly that following the initial identification of options considered worthy of more detailed assessment following the Part 1 appraisal. Chapter 3 Sets out the detailed assessment of the schemes identified as meriting STAG Part 2 appraisal. Chapter 4 Presents a review of risk and uncertainty leading up to the economic appraisal set out in Chapter 3. Chapter 5 Provides an overview of the proposed monitoring and evaluation strategies. Chapter 6 The report concludes with a brief synopsis of the project and its recommendations, including the Appraisal Summary Table. 1.2.3 Volume 2 follows on from Volume 1, which covered the STAG Pre-appraisal and Part 1 Appraisal processes. 1.3 Definitions 1.3.1 Throughout this Report the following definitions are used. Options All of the competent ideas raised at the Optioneering Workshop Schemes Those Options taken forward for sifting prior to STAG Part 1 Packages Groups of Schemes appraised under STAG Part 1 Reference Case A collection of projects outwith this Study remit which are either committed to be built in the future, or assumed to be almost certain to go-ahead. The appraisal of identified measures takes place against the background of this assumed Reference Case. ‘Outside World’ Transport schemes beyond the scope of this Study’s Transport recommendations, but which could have a significant impact Changes on demand in the study area if they occur Scenario Group of all the necessary Reference Case assumptions regarding land-use development, economy and ‘outside world’ transport changes HOV A High Occupancy Vehicle for the purposes of this report is (High Occupancy assumed to include all buses, coaches and HGVs, as well as Vehicle) taxis and private cars with more than one occupant. SITCoS Queensferry Cross Forth Page 3 MVA / Scott Wilson STAG2 Report v4.0 June 2005 Chapter 2 CONSULTATION SESTRAN Integrated Transport Corridor Studies - SITCoS Queensferry – Cross Forth Corridor Final Report – Technical Annex (Volume 2) 2. CONSULTATION 2.1 Initial Consultation 2.1.1 The initial inception process was set out in Volume 1. This included meetings with the wider SITCoS Steering Group as well as early discussions with the officers of authorities specifically affected by this corridor (Fife Council, Forth Estuary Transport Authority – FETA, City of Edinburgh Council and West Lothian Council). 2.1.2 A specific Steering Group was constituted for the Queensferry Cross Forth Corridor, comprising officers of the above authorities plus representatives of MVA and Scott Wilson. This met regularly at monthly intervals throughout the course of the study, in addition to other ad hoc meetings as necessary. 2.1.3 Feedback from all meetings was used to shape the definition of study objectives and the options to be appraised at both Part 1 and Part 2 levels, and agreement was obtained for each step in the study process culminating in the production of the Final Report. 2.1.4 Consultation also took place with Fife Independent Disability Network on 4th March 2004, and is recorded in study Information Note 15 issued by MVA. The views expressed in this consultation were taken into account when considering ways to maximise the attractiveness of public transport. 2.2 Consultation Workshops 2.2.1 Consultation on the emerging schemes following the STAG Part 1 appraisal took place on 5th & 7th May 2004 in Dunfermline. The workshop on 5th May 2004 comprised “professional” stakeholders and focused particularly on the benefits/disbenefits of the schemes, and sought informed comments on particular aspects of implementability. In addition attendees were encouraged to consider to what extent the emerging schemes met the ten objectives established for the study. 2.2.2 The workshop on 7th May 2004 included elected members and other community representatives, and focused particularly on the public acceptability of the emerging schemes. At both workshops attendees were given brief presentations on the emerging schemes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • F I F E Firth of Forth
    Dundee Tentsmuir National Tayport Tay Bridges Nature Reserve Newport- Cairnie Fruit Farm on- Tay y a T f Tentsmuir o Forest Lindores Abbey h t r i F Leuchars St Andrews Museum Balmullo St Andrews Botanical Gardens St Andrews Cathedral E Perth Newburgh F St Andrews Aquarium F I F British Golf Museum O W E St Andrews H O E Cupar T H Fife Co ast al Kingsbarns Distillery Scottish O Road Pa th & Visitor Centre Driving Centre Kingsbarns Springeld Cambo Estate Auchtermuchty Ceres Ladybank den er E Riv K FIFE E U Falkland N Crail West S T Lomond Freuchie A Crail Pottery Lomond East Lomond E 90 H E GMP Scotland Ltd M 520 Hills T 425 Crail Museum (stockcar racing) & Heritage Centre Milnathort Scotland’s Scottish Vintage Anstruther Bus Museum Kinross Kennoway Pittenweem Secret Lundin Leslie Glenrothes Markinch Bunker Knockhill Loch Leven Links St Monans Racing Circuit River Leven Windygates Leven Methil Elie Isle of May Kinglassie Thornton h n Dollar at Buckhave P Ballingry al Tillicoultry st East Wemyss oa St Fillan’s Cave Cardenden C Methil Heritage Centre fe Fi Isle of May Ferry Blairadam Kelty Lochgelly Scottish Fisheries Museum Forest t h Dysart r Stirling Clackmannan Wemyss Caves o Saline Cowdenbeath Kirkcaldy F f Elie Water Sports St Monans Windmill o St Monans Heritage Collection Devilla Forest Oakley h Dunfermline Crossgates t Kincardine i r Valleyeld Crossford Burntisland Kinghorn F Cairneyhill Glasgow Aberdour Kirkcaldy Galleries Lochore Meadows County Park The Ecology Centre Ravenscraig Castle Cluny Clays Limekilns Rosyth
    [Show full text]
  • Forth Replacement Crossing Study Report 3 : Option Generation and Sifting Volume 1 : Main Report
    Forth Replacement Crossing Study Report 3 : Option Generation and Sifting Volume 1 : Main Report December 2006 Jacobs U.K. Limited, 95 Bothwell Street, Glasgow G2 7HX Tel: 0141 204 2511 Fax: 0141 226 3109 www.jacobs.com Transport Scotland Forth Replacement Crossing Study Authorisation Jacobs UK Ltd in association with Faber Maunsell, Grant Thornton and Tribal Consulting has great pleasure in presenting this document. Copyright Jacobs U.K. Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs U.K. Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs U.K. Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs U.K. Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs U.K. Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Jacobs U.K. Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs U.K. Limited has been made. Authorisation & Preparation Prepared by: Ian Dudgeon Reviewed by: David Webster Approved by: Alan Duff Version History Version No.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Strategy Forth Estuary Local Plan
    Flood Risk Management Strategy Forth Estuary Local Plan District This section provides supplementary information on the characteristics and impacts of river, coastal and surface water flooding. Future impacts due to climate change, the potential for natural flood management and links to river basin management are also described within these chapters. Detailed information about the objectives and actions to manage flooding are provided in Section 2. Section 3: Supporting information 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 379 3.2 River flooding ......................................................................................... 380 East Lothian and Berwickshire catchment group .............................. 381 Almond and Edinburgh catchment group.......................................... 390 Firth of Forth catchment group ......................................................... 400 3.3 Coastal flooding ...................................................................................... 408 3.4 Surface water flooding ............................................................................ 418 Forth Estuary Local Plan District Section 3 378 3.1 Introduction In the Forth Estuary Local Plan District, river flooding is reported across two distinct river catchments. Coastal flooding and surface water flooding are reported across the whole Local Plan District. A summary of the number of properties and Annual Average Damages from river, coastal and surface water
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth
    Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth (Residential) FIFEplan Local Development Plan Proposed Plan December 2014 PPCA Ltd FIFEPlan Contents Local Development Plan Proposed Plan 1 Introduction ...................................................................... 2 2 Planning Policy Context ................................................... 4 3 Hilton as a Development Location ................................... 9 4 Proposed Uses .............................................................. 10 Hilton, Rosyth LDP-ROS002 5 Site Effectiveness .......................................................... 11 6 Access ............................................................................ 14 PPCA Ltd On behalf of 7 Council Site Assessment ............................................... 15 Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Limited 8 Conclusion ...................................................................... 20 Appendix 1 – Location Plan .................................................. 21 Appendix 2 – Indicative Development Framework .............. 23 Appendix 3 – Transport Planning Accessibility Statement . 25 Appendix 4 – Fifeplan LDP Candidate Site Assessment ...... 43 ASPFL Hilton, Rosyth 1 Introduction 1.2 Hilton represents an excellent opportunity to deliver a high quality residential development that will, in part, contribute to meeting 1.1 PPCA Ltd has been instructed by the Alfred Stewart Property the SESPlan additional housing requirement and address the Foundation Limited (ASPFL) to make a representation to
    [Show full text]
  • Notices and Proceedings
    THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER FOR THE SCOTTISH TRAFFIC AREA NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 2005 PUBLICATION DATE: 15 April 2013 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 06 May 2013 Correspondence should be addressed to: Scottish Traffic Area Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 249 8142 Website: www.gov.uk The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Notices and Proceedings will be published on: 29/04/2013 Publication Price £3.50 (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS Important Information All correspondence relating to bus registrations and public inquiries should be sent to: Scottish Traffic Area Level 6 The Stamp Office 10 Waterloo Place Edinburgh EH1 3EG The public counter in Edinburgh is open for the receipt of documents between 9.30am and 4pm Monday to Friday. Please note that only payments for bus registration applications can be made at this counter. The telephone number for bus registration enquiries is 0131 200 4927. General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede sections where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications and requests reflect information provided by applicants.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth (Employment)
    Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth (Employment) FIFEplan Local Development Plan Proposed Plan December 2014 PPCA Ltd FIFEPlan Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................... 2 Local Development Plan Proposed Plan 2 Planning Policy Context .................................................. 4 3 Hilton as a Development Location ................................... 9 4 Proposed Uses ............................................................ 10 Hilton, Rosyth 7 Access ........................................................................ 12 8 Council Site Assessment .............................................. 13 9 Conclusion ................................................................... 19 PPCA Ltd On behalf of Appendix 1 – Location Plan ................................................. 20 Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Limited Appendix 2 – Fife Employment Land Audit Extract ................ 22 Appendix 3 – Indicative Development Framework ................. 25 Appendix 4 – Transport Planning Accessibility Statement ..... 27 Appendix 5 – FIFEPlan Development Strategy Consultation.. 40 Appendix 6 – Scottish Natural Heritage Letter ..................... 42 Appendix 7 – Energised Environments Environmental Supporting Information ....................................................... 55 Appendix 8 – Scottish Natural Heritage Email ...................... 70 Appendix 9 – Fifeplan LDP Candidate Site Assessment ......... 72 ASPFL Hilton, Rosyth 1 Introduction 1.1 PPCA Ltd
    [Show full text]
  • Table 5 Settlements in Descending Order of Size
    Table 5 Settlements in descending order of size Estimated Estimated Estimated Settlement Settlement Settlement population* population* population* Glasgow 1,090,530 Oban 8,360 Chryston 3,910 Edinburgh 456,320 Blairgowrie 8,350 Auchinleck 3,890 Aberdeen 199,790 Nairn 8,190 Auchterarder 3,860 Dundee 152,930 Buckie 8,100 Milton of Campsie 3,860 Motherwell 135,050 Westhill 8,060 Harthill 3,850 Falkirk 94,130 Queensferry 7,910 Tayport 3,830 Greenock 74,860 Thurso 7,880 Lennoxtown 3,820 East Kilbride 74,770 Kilbirnie 7,700 Kirkcudbright 3,780 Blantyre | Hamilton 68,410 Peebles 7,670 Invergordon 3,770 Ayr | Prestwick 64,220 Girvan 7,630 Oakley 3,750 Livingston 54,760 Wick 7,450 Newton Stewart 3,740 Kirkcaldy 49,220 Dunblane 7,330 New Cumnock 3,720 Stirling 45,980 Lerwick 7,270 Kirkmuirhill | Blackwood 3,700 Dumbarton 45,900 Prestonpans 7,210 Lesmahagow 3,600 Kilmarnock 45,110 Strathaven 7,200 Darvel 3,590 Perth 44,520 Loanhead 6,900 Anstruther 3,590 Inverness 44,180 Lossiemouth 6,800 Eaglesham 3,550 Cumbernauld 43,710 Balloch 6,790 Tain 3,460 Glenrothes 42,130 Crieff 6,580 Clackmannan 3,420 Dunfermline 39,320 North Berwick 6,490 Eyemouth 3,300 Dalkeith 38,750 Stewarton 6,440 Stoneyburn | Addiebrownhill 3,290 Irvine 38,110 Tillicoultry 6,390 Hallglen 3,250 Ardrossan 33,210 Moodiesburn 6,320 Kemnay 3,220 Kirkintilloch | Lenzie 32,460 Peterculter | Milltimber 6,310 Kincardine 3,150 Dumfries 31,790 Kirriemuir 6,220 Kinghorn 3,140 Alloa 29,760 Beith 6,200 West Calder 3,010 Inverkeithing | Dalgety Bay 27,220 Dunbar 6,190 Aviemore 3,000 Buckhaven 26,860
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Assessment of Corridor B
    APPENDIX C - ASSESSMENT OF CORRIDOR B C1 DESCRIPTION OF CORRIDOR Corridor B is the second of the options to be assessed (taken in order from the west). It is shown in Drawing Number. 49550/G/02, and an extract is given below showing the corridor. It is defined at its western boundary by the oil pipeline which crosses the Firth between Bo’ness and Torry Bay. The eastern boundary of this corridor is formed by the gas pipelines which cross the Firth between the area west of Blackness Bay and Ironmill Bay ©Crown copyright. All rights reserved. License Number 100019139 C2 INFLUENCE OF GEOLOGY East of Grangemouth, between Preston Island to the north and Bo'ness to the south, it is suggested that rockhead plunges to an anticipated depth of 190m in the middle of the Forth. The maximum depth to rockhead is anticipated to decrease eastwards, although conjectural depths have not been mapped. The log of one borehole in Corridor B, near the northern edge of the current shipping channel, was extended to over 100m without reaching rockhead. This suggests that in this area there is generally a considerable depth of sediment. In this corridor the overlying sediments are also classified as ranging from fair to unpredictable. In the absence of more detailed information, the sediments are judged unsuitable as founding strata for the main towers of a large suspension bridge. A cross section of the Firth of Forth within this corridor has been prepared to illustrate the approximate geology. This has been done using available information and is shown in Figure C.1 below.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fife (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1998
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1998 No. 3243 (S. 199) LOCAL GOVERNMENT, SCOTLAND The Fife (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1998 Made - - - - 17th December 1998 Coming into force - - 1st January 1999 Whereas under section 17(1) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973(1), as read with Schedule 5 to that Act(2), the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland on 9th October 1998 submitted to the Secretary of State a report on a review together with its proposals for the future electoral arrangements for the area of Fife Council; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 17(2) and 233(3) of, and Schedule 5 to, the said Act and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, the Secretary of State hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Fife (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1998 and shall come into force on 1st January 1999. Interpretation 2. In the Schedule to this Order– (a) a reference to– (i) an electoral ward is a reference to that electoral ward as constituted in this Order; and (ii) a road, footpath, railway line, river, burn or canal shall, where the context so admits, be construed as a reference to the centre line of the feature concerned; and (b) the following abbreviations are used:– “EW” for electoral ward; “NG Ref” for National Grid Reference as published on Ordnance Survey Maps. Electoral arrangements 3.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Find Us
    How to Find Us By Train The nearest railway station is Dunfermline Town (note: not Dunfermline Queen Margaret). The Shared Care Scotland offices are approximately a 10min walk south up Bothwell Street past the ASDA supermarket straight on across the roundabout and up to the crossroads and traffic lights. Izatt Avenue is to your right. Go past the GP surgery on the corner of the Avenue and you’ll see the Business Centre on your left. The main entrance is a little further ahead beyond where Izatt Avenue narrows. If arriving at Inverkeithing railway station then our offices are a 20 min taxi ride away. There is a taxi rank outside the main station entrance. By Car To get to Shared Care Scotland from Edinburgh, Glasgow, Falkirk or Stirling via the Forth Road Bridge or Perth: • Head along the M90 and exit at Junction 2 (the A823 turn off) and follow signs for Dunfermline (1 o’clock exit at the roundabout as you come off the M90). • Straight through the next two roundabouts on route to Dunfermline. After the second roundabout go straight through the first set of traffic lights. • At the next set of traffic lights turn left into Izzat Avenue, straight over the mini roundabout and the entrance for the Dunfermline Business Centre is on the left. To get to Shared Care Scotland via the Kincardine Bridge: • Follow the A985 for approximately seven miles until you reach the large roundabout, take the second exit (A994) for Dunfermline, passing through Cairneyhill and Crossford. • Just past Crossford turn right at the first set of traffic lights, follow the road (Coal Road) until you reach the T junction at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Find Us
    How to find us From Kincardine Bridge From Edinburgh From Dundee and Kirkcaldy Drive over the Kincardine Bridge and Leave the M90 motorway at Junction 3. Travel on the A92 southbound. Leave at the traffic signals bear right onto the At the roundabout take the second exit the A92 at Junction 2a (signposted A986 (signposted Kirkcaldy, Forth Road following the signs for Dunfermline. At Dunfermline, M90 North). At the Bridge, Dunfermline). the next roundabout take the second exit roundabout take the third exit. At the next and carry on to the next roundabout. Take roundabout take the second exit and At the roundabout take the second exit the third exit and drive past Fife College carry on to the next roundabout. Take the onto the A985. to the next roundabout where you should third exit and drive past Fife College to take the first exit by the Holiday Inn the next roundabout where you should Continue along this road. At the Express. Carnegie Conference Centre is at take the first exit by the Holiday Inn roundabout take the second exit the top of the road. Express. Carnegie Conference Centre is at signposted Cairneyhill. Continue through the top of the road. Cairneyhill village and follow the road (A994) through Crossford. From Perth and the North Continue straight ahead through the traffic Join the M90 towards Forth Bridge lights and Pittencrieff Park is on your right. and Edinburgh. Dundee At the next set of lights, continue Leave at Junction 3 (signposted straight ahead along Carnegie Drive, Perth A92/A907 Kirkcaldy, Glenrothes, past the Tesco supermarket on your left.
    [Show full text]
  • Levenmouth Sustainable Transport Study STAG Part 2 Appraisal Report & Appendices Click Here
    South East Scotland Transport Partnership (SEStran) & Fife Council Levenmouth Sustainable Transport Study STAG Part 2 Appraisal Report Final Version November 2008 South East Scotland Transport Partnership (SEStran) & Fife Council Levenmouth Sustainable Transport Study STAG Part 2 Appraisal Report Revision Schedule Levenmouth Sustainable Transport Study November 2008 S101156 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 25 September 2008 Draft Report Jonathan Campbell Marwan AL-Azzawi Marwan AL-Azzawi Transport Planner Project Manager Project Manager 02 23 October 2008 Final Draft Report Jonathan Campbell Marwan AL-Azzawi Marwan AL-Azzawi Transport Planner Project Manager Project Manager 03 27 November 2008 Final Report Jonathan Campbell Marwan AL-Azzawi Marwan AL-Azzawi Transport Planner Project Manager Project Manager Scott Wilson Citypoint 2 25 Tyndrum Street Glasgow This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed G4 OJY to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may Tel 0141 354 5600 copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Scotland Ltd. Any advice, Fax 0141 354 5601 opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]