CEE Fluvial System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CEE Fluvial System Factors controlling the evolution of fluvial systems in C-E Europe during the last cold stage (60-8 ka BP) Leszek Starkel12 , Danuta J. Michczyńska,, Piotr Gębica3 Timea Kiss 456 , Andrei Panin , Ioana Persoiu 1Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Św. Jana 22, 31-018 Krakow, Poland, [email protected] 2Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics– CSE, GADAM Centre of Excellence, Krzywoustego 2, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland, [email protected] 3University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Department of Geography, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland, [email protected] 4Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, Egyetem u. 2-6, H-6722, Szeged, Hungary, [email protected] 5Lomonosov Moscow State University, Geography Faculty, Lengory 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia, [email protected] 6Ştefan cel Mare University, Department of Geography, Universităţii 13, 720229, Suceava, Romania, [email protected] Location 20° 30° 40° Sea level fluctuations Present time 2500 m Legend (distance from the Scandinavian ice Area of interest Dvina (Baltic and Black Seas) ice sheet Atlantic Ocean ) sheet Baltic 0 m tundra and arctic desert Sea Neman Late Glacial 2500 m park tundra Vistula Vertical crustal CEE fluvial 50° Permafrost 0 m forest tundra movements system LGM 2500 m Od r Dnieper boreal forest Legend e Rivers = Dniester deciduous forest Sea 0 m = Mountain = rising subsiding forest steppe = = Increase of 2500 m ranges = 34 - 44 ka cal BP == Tisza= Vegetation cover = mountains basins State borders = continentality steppe = Maros = = = Subsiding = = = = Black areas = 0 m boundary of permafrost = = = Sea 70° 60° 50° 40°j N Research = glacioisostatic areas = = = Danube movments Changes in the vertical zonality of the vegetation cover during the last CLIMATE 44 ka cal BP (simplified). Global and regional factors influencing the evolution of the fluvial systems in C-E Europe. LGM 20° 30° 40° Legend Dvina The evolution of fluvial systems in Central-Eastern Europe reflects in general a sequence of climatic changes registered on Greenland Present Rivers 18 Baltic in ice cores and the isotopicd O curve. But in C-E Europe region we observe several deviations connected with different factors. Present Sea Sea Neman The C-14 and TL/OSL data helped to recognize the role of the second order climatic fluctuations in the mountains and their Mountain ranges forelands, change in longitudinal valley profiles and superposition of other factors – like tectonic component uplift or subsidence, State borders blocking by Scandinavian ice sheet (or crossing of interfluves), marine regression or transgression as well as connected with Subsiding areas Maximum extent Vistula diachronous expansion of forest vegetation and change in temperature and humidity in north-south and east-west transects. of the Ice Sheet 50° Polish Carpathians Maros Fan Tisza Valley Nemunas Teleorman Someº ul Mic Valley Danube Delta N-Sandomierz Basin N-Poland Glaciated W-Dvina S-Sandomierz Basin Vistula Delta Upper Dnieper Middle Dnieper Basin Mountain glaciers Central Poland The long Interpleniglacial (58-28 ka cal BP) is represented in the mountains and plateaus by thick slope deposits interfingering with Permafrost limit Dnieper 8.2 ka event Od r SM + 0m alluvia rich in organic remains (peat layers). Large alluvial fans are extending at the outlet from the mountains. In these fans, 2-3 cuts Ice margin e 9.3 ka event streamways SM SM SM = Dniester 10 = - 100 10 and fills were registered at several localities. They are especially well recognized in the Sandomierz Basin (S Poland).Rapid cooling Transfer of glacial SM LM SM meltwaters M and the increase of continentality caused expansion of permafrost and a distinct change to incission, which preceded the maximum = LM LM Dunes GS-1 LM LM + -40 = advance of Scandinavian ice sheet and caused the covering of the interpleniglacial alluvial plains by thick younger loess. That = = GI-1b Tundra = LM == Tisza= LATE GI-1d M = LM M Interpleniglacial period, with frequent climatic fluctuations, was the time of deposition of deluvial and colluvial silts and sands up to 20 m Park tundra = 15 GLACIAL LM 15 = thick, and in smaller valleys dissecting loess plateaus. Only in the subsiding Pannonian Basin we observe permanent trend to Steppe Maros = = = Deciduous forest = = Black aggradation. = LM steppe = = = Sea LM = = LM During maximum extend of the ice sheet, ice-dammed lakes and ice-marginal valleys were formed. Also glaciofluvial fills were = = Danube GS-2 formed during the transfluence into the Black Sea (area). Braided rivers at the mountain forelands formed incised lower alluvial fans. 20 SM 20 Strong eolian activity caused the formation of dune fields, especially extensive in the western elevated part of the Pannonian Basin = -120 GS-1 / Holocene 20° 30° 40° (Transdanubia) build of sands probably blown out from glaciofluvial fan of Danube at its outlet from theAlps. Wind activity was very high + + + Legend Dvina +++ in some intramountain depression (like Jasło-Sanok Doły) where deflation eroded shallow depressions and coarser Carpathian loess + + + BR Present Rivers + has filled some valley floors. + + 25 25 Baltic +++ GS-3 Present Sea Neman + + During the ice-sheet recession, there has been gradual downcutting, supported by glacioisostatic uplift. The erosion was going Sea limit Sea + during GS-1 + ka cal BP down several tens meters below the present-day Baltic Sea level, and it was stopped by the Littorina transgression in the mid- Mountain ranges + + GS-4 + + + Holocene. From about 18 ka cal BP,a gradual expansion of boreal trees from the East and the reduction of the sediment load started. State borders + + Vistula Only the greatest rivers, as the Danube and Tisza in the subsiding depressions far from supplying mountain areas preserved Subsiding areas 30 GS-5 30 = = 50° meandering channels during the whole time. In most river valleys gradual change from braided channel to meandering ones was + + Uplifting areas typical. There were two warmer phases when followed formation of great palaeomeanders: 19-17 ka cal BP (Sagvar – Lascaux Tundra Dnieper GS-6 Od r BR BR Forest tundra e GS-7 interstadial) and 14.7 – 11.7ka cal BP (Bølling – Allerød – Young er Dryas. The large palaeomeanders of the older phase are developed = Dniester 35 35 over boreal forests-steppes of northern Ukraine and southern Russia, along tributaries of Tisza, and very rare in other regions. After Boreal forest GS-8 Deciduous forest = next cool phase (equivalent of Pomeranian glacial advance) followed second warmer phase of Late Glacial, when great meanders = Legend Forests teppe = = = developed, which are better expressed north of the Carpathians where advance of forest stabilized the outflow. That system was == Tisza= fluvial aggradation erosional phase Steppe = GS-9 = INTERPLENIGLACIAL UPPER PLENIGLACIALBR braided HOLOCENE river transition (erosional) abandoned during Younger Dryas and changed to stable discharges reflected in small scale palaeomeanders. = Maros = 40 M icemarginstream40 = = GS-10 meandering river Much greater diversity has been registered after Upper Pleniglacial on the extensive alluvial fan of Maros River surrounded by = = Black transfluent meltwaters = LM / SM large / small meanders = = = Sea GS-11 sea transgresion permanently subsiding areas. Here frequent channel avulsions reflected the changes in hydrological regime of the headwater area. = glaciofluvial deposits + = = = LM organic deposits = sea regresion During the early Holocene, under dense forest, which climbed up to 1500-2000 m a.s.l., relatively low discharge and sediment load Danube GS-12 colluvia - solifluction eolian activity was characteristic of rivers, especially in the Pannonian Basin, still occupied partly by steppe vegetation. 45 45 The climate has changed about 9.5 ka cal BP when followed the phase of frequent floods and expansion of deciduous trees, Palaeogeographic maps during LGM and GS-1/ Holocene -44 -40 -36 reflected in minerogenic layers in peatbogs and avulsions of river channels even with local tendency to braiding. transition (simplified). Data from different river valleys: 40 A 20 V LV H ? 1 H2 m a.s.l. V 0 V LV H LV 20 300 1 H3 B V V V ? 0 VISTULA. Fluctuations of H res LV the channel level during the Cracow -20 Dunajec last cold stage along Vistula 200 LV C H1-H3 10 River (after Starkel et al. ? San 2007, changed). Grey Wieprz -10 rectangles show the main 10 D phases of climatically 100 V LV m a.s.l. H H 200 controlled erosion in most E -10 V regions of the former LV H- H 10 1 2 periglacial zone in southern ? LV 20 and middle Poland. A. The H1 H2 -10 F Lower Vistula valley in Warsaw Bug-Narew 100 0 theToruń Basin B. The Brda Delta ? H2 Vistula valley in the Warsaw res transgr. Basin, C. Middle course of MAROS. Paleochannel generations and their channel TISZA. Channel generations in the Middle Tisza and Sajó-Hernád H1 -20 LG G 10 the Prosna valley, D. The pattern on the Maros alluvial fan. 1–– paleochannel, 2 alluvial fan region (after Gábris et al., 2012, changed). 1– LGM Gulf 1 2 3 4 5 meandering, 3–– anastomosing, 4 braided pattern, 5 –braided paleochannel, 2– paleochannel from the last interstadial of 6 7 8 9 10 0 Mroga valley on the Łódź -10 20 OSL age (ka) of the point- or mid-channel bars (after the Upper Pleniglacial, 3–– braided Oldest Dryas paleochannel, 4 km Plateau, E. Belnianka valley 500 400 300 200 100 0 H Sümeghy et al., 2013, changed). ? (after Ludwikowska-Kędzia Bøø lling/Aller d paleochannel, 5 – Preboreal meanders, 6 – Subboreal 0 2000) and Bierawka valley, meanders, 7–– unidentified age, 8 settlements. VISTULA. Longitudinal profile and schematic transversal F. The Vistula gap through 10 profiles of the Vistula River valley (after Starkel 2007, I uplands, G. Middle course of Sea level changes (m) ? STRATIGRAPHY DANUBE DELTA -100 -50 0 50 changed): 1–– longitudinal channel profile, 2 fluvial ? the Wieprz valley on Lublin -10 J 20 terraces, 3- glaciofluvial terraces, 4– Vistulian terrace with Plateau, H.
Recommended publications
  • Elaboration of Priority Components of the Transboundary Neman/Nemunas River Basin Management Plan (Key Findings)
    Elaboration of Priority Components of the Transboundary Neman/Nemunas River Basin Management Plan (Key Findings) June 2018 Disclaimer: This report was prepared with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 1 OVERVIEW OF THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS ............................... 5 1.1 General description of the Neman River basin on the territory of Belarus .......................... 5 1.2 Description of the hydrographic network ............................................................................. 9 1.3 General description of land runoff changes and projections with account of climate change........................................................................................................................................ 11 2 IDENTIFICATION (DELINEATION) AND TYPOLOGY OF SURFACE WATER BODIES IN THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ON THE TERRITORY OF BELARUS ............................................................................. 12 3 IDENTIFICATION (DELINEATION) AND MAPPING OF GROUNDWATER BODIES IN THE NEMAN RIVER BASIN ................................................................................................................................... 16 4 IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES OF HEAVY IMPACT AND EFFECTS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY ON SURFACE WATER BODIES
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltics EU/Schengen Zone Baltic Tourist Map Traveling Between
    The Baltics Development Fund Development EU/Schengen Zone Regional European European in your future your in g Investin n Unio European Lithuanian State Department of Tourism under the Ministry of Economy, 2019 Economy, of Ministry the under Tourism of Department State Lithuanian Tampere Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, of Agency Development and Investment Pori © Estonian Tourist Board / Enterprise Estonia, Enterprise / Board Tourist Estonian © FINL AND Vyborg Turku HELSINKI Estonia Latvia Lithuania Gulf of Finland St. Petersburg Estonia is just a little bigger than Denmark, Switzerland or the Latvia is best known for is Art Nouveau. The cultural and historic From Vilnius and its mysterious Baroque longing to Kaunas renowned Netherlands. Culturally, it is located at the crossroads of Northern, heritage of Latvian architecture spans many centuries, from authentic for its modernist buildings, from Trakai dating back to glorious Western and Eastern Europe. The first signs of human habitation in rural homesteads to unique samples of wooden architecture, to medieval Lithuania to the only port city Klaipėda and the Curonian TALLINN Novgorod Estonia trace back for nearly 10,000 years, which means Estonians luxurious palaces and manors, churches, and impressive Art Nouveau Spit – every place of Lithuania stands out for its unique way of Orebro STOCKHOLM Lake Peipus have been living continuously in one area for a longer period than buildings. Capital city Riga alone is home to over 700 buildings built in rendering the colorful nature and history of the country. Rivers and lakes of pure spring waters, forests of countless shades of green, many other nations in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • VILNIAUS GEDIMINO TECHNIKOS UNIVERSITETAS Neringa Červokaitė EKOLOGINĖS NEVĖŽIO UPĖS SITUACIJOS VERTINIMAS IR PREVENCINĖS
    VILNIAUS GEDIMINO TECHNIKOS UNIVERSITETAS APLINKOS INŽINERIJOS FAKULTETAS HIDRAULIKOS KATEDRA Neringa Červokaitė EKOLOGINĖS NEVĖŽIO UPĖS SITUACIJOS VERTINIMAS IR PREVENCINĖS GERINIMO PRIEMONĖS THE ASSESSMENT OF NEVĖŽIS RIVER’S ECOLOGICAL SITUATION AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF IMPROVEMENT Baigiamasis magistro darbas Vandens ūkio inžinerijos studijų programa, valstybinis kodas 62404T105 Aplinkos inžinerijos studijų kryptis Vilnius, 2011 VILNIAUS GEDIMINO TECHNIKOS UNIVERSITETAS APLINKOS INŽINERIJOS FAKULTETAS HIDRAULIKOS KATEDRA TVIRTINU Katedros vedėjas _______________________ (Parašas) _______________________ (Vardas, pavardė) ______________________ (Data) Neringa Červokaitė EKOLOGINĖS NEVĖŽIO UPĖS SITUACIJOS VERTINIMAS IR PREVENCINĖS GERINIMO PRIEMONĖS THE ASSESSMENT OF NEVĖŽIS RIVER’S ECOLOGICAL SITUATION AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES OF IMPROVEMENT Baigiamasis magistro darbas Vandens ūkio inžinerijos studijų programa, valstybinis kodas 62404T105 Aplinkos inžinerijos studijų kryptis Vadovas: prof. dr. Valentinas Šaulys__________________________________ ( Moksl. laipsnis, vardas, pavardė) (Parašas) (Data) Konsultantas: lekt. Regina Žukienė_________________________________ ( Moksl. laipsnis, vardas, pavardė) (Parašas) (Data) Vilnius, 2011 2 VILNIAUS GEDIMINO TECHNIKOS UNIVERSITETAS APLINKOS INŽINERIJOS FAKULTETAS HIDRAULIKOS KATEDRA TVIRTINU ..........................…………………....... mokslo sritis Katedros vedėjas .....................……………………......mokslo kryptis _________________________ (parašas) ..........…....………….………….…....studijų kryptis
    [Show full text]
  • LITHUANIA. Nature Tourism Map SALDUS JELGAVA DOBELE IECAVA AIZKRAUKLE
    LITHUANIA. Nature tourism map SALDUS JELGAVA DOBELE IECAVA AIZKRAUKLE LIEPĀJA L AT V I A 219 Pikeliai BAUSKA Laižuva Nemunėlio 3 6 32 1 Radviliškis LITHUANIA. Kivyliai Židikai MAŽEIKIAI 34 ŽAGARĖ 170 7 NAUJOJI 7 Skaistgirys E 0 2 0 KAMANOS ŽAGARĖ 9 SKUODAS 4 AKMENĖ 36 1 153 1 Ylakiai NATURE REGIONAL 5 Kriukai Tirkšliai 3 Medeikiai 1 RESERVE 6 PARK Krakiai 5 5 5 1 NATURE TOURISM MAP Žemalė Bariūnai Žeimelis AKMENĖ Kruopiai Užlieknė 31 Jurdaičiai 1 2 Rinkuškiai Širvenos ež. Lenkimai VIEKŠNIAI 5 JONIŠKIS 0 Saločiai Daukšiai 4 9 Balėnos BIRŽAI Mosėdis E 6 SCALE 1 : 800 000 6 BIRŽAI 8 VENTA 7 REGIONAL 1 SEDA 2 N e 35 Barstyčiai 37 1 PARK Gataučiai 5 2 m VENTA 2 1 u 1 5 n Žemaičių Vaškai 2 ė Papilė 1 l SALANTAI Kalvarija REGIONAL is Plinkšių PARK Raubonys REGIONAL ež. Gruzdžiai 2 PARK 1 Linkavičiai A 3 Grūšlaukė Nevarėnai LINKUVA Pajiešmeniai 1 4 2 1 4 Krinčinas 6 1 3 A 1 6 1 Ustukiai Meškuičiai Mūša Juodupė Darbėnai SALANTAI -Li Šventoji Platelių Tryškiai 15 el Alsėdžiai 5 up 1 Narteikiai ė 5 ež. 1 1 Plateliai Drąsučiai 2 PASVALYS 4 6 ŽEMAITIJA Naisiai 0 2 TELŠIAI Eigirdžiai Verbūnai 15 2 Lygumai PANDĖLYS Šateikiai NATIONAL KURŠĖNAI JONIŠKĖLIS Girsūdai Kūlupėnai PARK Degaičiai E272 A11 Kužiai PAKRUOJIS Meškalaukis ROKIŠKIS Rūdaičiai 8 Skemai 1 1 VABALNINKAS Mastis Dūseikiai A 50 0 A 1 11 Micaičiai a Rainiai t A PALANGA a 1 i n Ginkūnai 9 o č Klovainiai Ryškėnai e 2 Prūsaliai Babrungas y Vijoliai u Kavoliškis OBELIAI 72 Viešvėnai v V v E2 ir Kairiai ė Pumpėnai .
    [Show full text]
  • Projectione of Runoff Changes in Nemunas Basin Rivers According to Watbal Model
    Project «River basin management and climate change adaptation in the Neman River basin » Projectione of Runoff Changes in Nemunas Basin Rivers according to WatBal model Edvinas Stonevičius Andrius Štaras Vilnius, 2012 Introduction River runoff and its long term variations are a result of climate processes. Consequently, a long river runoff data series is an excellent indicator of climate change intensity. There has been much evidence of climate change impact on river flow regime in the world (IPCC 2007) and in the Baltic Sea region (BACC... 2008). Investigations of long-term trends of river runoff are a very important challenge for both the scientific and applied aspects of planning of water resources in the future (Kundzewicz 2004). The runoff is related to climate and climate changes usually cause the changes in runoff regime, but the relation between climate and runoff is very complicated. The different catchment properties may influence the direction and the magnitude of changes, so the calculation of runoff from the climate variables is a tricky task. The mathematical models are very useful tolls in such tasks. There are a lot of mathematical runoff models developed at various time scales (e.g. hourly, daily, monthly and yearly) and to varying degrees of complexity. The complex and short time step models can account for more detailed processes of runoff formation, but they also need more precise parameterization and more frequent climatological data. The studies of climate change impacts on runoff are based on the output of climate models, but these outputs are not very precise in short time steps. The parameterization of complex models is very hard task, because many of model parameters cannot be measured or estimated on available data.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps -- by Region Or Country -- Eastern Hemisphere -- Europe
    G5702 EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5702 Alps see G6035+ .B3 Baltic Sea .B4 Baltic Shield .C3 Carpathian Mountains .C6 Coasts/Continental shelf .G4 Genoa, Gulf of .G7 Great Alföld .P9 Pyrenees .R5 Rhine River .S3 Scheldt River .T5 Tisza River 1971 G5722 WESTERN EUROPE. REGIONS, NATURAL G5722 FEATURES, ETC. .A7 Ardennes .A9 Autoroute E10 .F5 Flanders .G3 Gaul .M3 Meuse River 1972 G5741.S BRITISH ISLES. HISTORY G5741.S .S1 General .S2 To 1066 .S3 Medieval period, 1066-1485 .S33 Norman period, 1066-1154 .S35 Plantagenets, 1154-1399 .S37 15th century .S4 Modern period, 1485- .S45 16th century: Tudors, 1485-1603 .S5 17th century: Stuarts, 1603-1714 .S53 Commonwealth and protectorate, 1660-1688 .S54 18th century .S55 19th century .S6 20th century .S65 World War I .S7 World War II 1973 G5742 BRITISH ISLES. GREAT BRITAIN. REGIONS, G5742 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Continental shelf .I6 Irish Sea .N3 National Cycle Network 1974 G5752 ENGLAND. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G5752 .A3 Aire River .A42 Akeman Street .A43 Alde River .A7 Arun River .A75 Ashby Canal .A77 Ashdown Forest .A83 Avon, River [Gloucestershire-Avon] .A85 Avon, River [Leicestershire-Gloucestershire] .A87 Axholme, Isle of .A9 Aylesbury, Vale of .B3 Barnstaple Bay .B35 Basingstoke Canal .B36 Bassenthwaite Lake .B38 Baugh Fell .B385 Beachy Head .B386 Belvoir, Vale of .B387 Bere, Forest of .B39 Berkeley, Vale of .B4 Berkshire Downs .B42 Beult, River .B43 Bignor Hill .B44 Birmingham and Fazeley Canal .B45 Black Country .B48 Black Hill .B49 Blackdown Hills .B493 Blackmoor [Moor] .B495 Blackmoor Vale .B5 Bleaklow Hill .B54 Blenheim Park .B6 Bodmin Moor .B64 Border Forest Park .B66 Bourne Valley .B68 Bowland, Forest of .B7 Breckland .B715 Bredon Hill .B717 Brendon Hills .B72 Bridgewater Canal .B723 Bridgwater Bay .B724 Bridlington Bay .B725 Bristol Channel .B73 Broads, The .B76 Brown Clee Hill .B8 Burnham Beeches .B84 Burntwick Island .C34 Cam, River .C37 Cannock Chase .C38 Canvey Island [Island] 1975 G5752 ENGLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuanian Paths to Modernity
    Lithuanian Paths to Modernity VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY EGIDIJUS ALEKSANDRAVIČIUS Lithuanian Paths to Modernity UDK 94 Al-79 ISBN 978-609-467-236-1 (Online) © Egidijus Aleksandravičius, 2016 ISBN 978-9955-34-637-1 (Online) © Vytautas Magnus University, 2016 ISBN 978-609-467-237-8 (Print) © “Versus aureus” Publishers, 2016 ISBN 978-9955-34-638-8 (Print) To Leonidas Donskis 7 Table of Contents Preface / Krzysztof Czyżewski. MODERNITY AND HISTORIAN’S LITHUANIA / 9 Acknowledgements / 21 Part I: Before Down A Lost Vision: The Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Political Imagination of the 19th Century / 25 Hebrew studies at Vilnius University and Lithuanian Ethnopolitical tendencies in the First part of the 19th century / 39 The double Fate of the Lithuanian gentry / 57 Political goals of Lithuanians, 1863–1918 / 69 Associational Culture and Civil Society in Lithuania under Tsarist Rule / 87 The Union’s Shadow, or Federalism in the Lithuanian Political Imagination of the late 19th and early 20th centuries / 105 Part II: The Turns of Historiography The Challenge of the Past: a survey of Lithuanian historiography / 137 Jews in Lithuanian Historiography / 155 Lost in Freedom: Competing historical grand narratives in post-Soviet Lithuania / 167 8 LITHUANIAN PATHS TO MODERNITY Part III: The Fall, Sovietization and After Lithuanian collaboration with the Nazis and the Soviets / 195 Conspiracy theories in traumatized societies: The Lithuanian case / 227 Lithuanian routes, stories, and memories / 237 Post-Communist Transition: The Case of Two Lithuanian Capital Cities / 249 Emigration and the goals of Lithuania’s foreign policy / 267 Guilt as Europe’s Borderline / 281 9 Preface Krzysztof Czyżewski MODERNITY AND HISTORIAN’S LITHUANIA I worry about ‘progressive’ history teaching… The task of the historian is to supply the dimension of knowledge and narrative without which we cannot be a civic whole..
    [Show full text]
  • Minister of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania
    Consolidated version as from 17.03.2016 Order published in: the Register of Legal Acts 15.01.2015, identification code 2015-00657 MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA ORDER ON THE APPROVAL OF THE ACTION PLAN ON THE CONSERVATION OF LANDSCAPE AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FOR 2015–2020 9 January 2015 No D1-12 Vilnius Acting in accordance with point 22¹ of the Strategic Planning Methodology approved by Resolution No 827 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania of 6 June 2002 “On the approval of the Strategic Planning Methodology” and implementing priority measure 277 of the implementing priority measures for the Programme of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania for 2012–2016 approved by Resolution No 228 of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania of 13 March 2013 “On the approval of the implementing priority measures for the Programme of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania for 2012–2016”, as well as acting with regard to paragraphs b and d of Article 5 of the European Landscape Convention, Article 6 of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the European Union Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, I hereby: 1. Approve the Action Plan on the Conservation of Landscape and Biological Diversity for 2015–2020 (appended). 2. Recommend that the municipalities, acting within their respective competence, participate in the implementation of the measures referred to in Annex 2 to the Action Plan on the Conservation of Landscape and Biological Diversity for 2015–2020 and provide for funds for their implementation. Minister of Environment Kęstutis Tre čiokas 2 APPROVED By Order No D1-12 of the Minister of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania of 9 January 2015 ACTION PLAN ON THE CONSERVATION OF LANDSCAPE AND BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FOR 2015–2020 CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Farming in the Nemunas River Basin: the Recent Trends and the Impact on the Water Bodies
    ISSN 1822-6760. Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development. 2012. Nr. 3 (32). Research papers. LIVESTOCK FARMING IN THE NEMUNAS RIVER BASIN: THE RECENT TRENDS AND THE IMPACT ON THE WATER BODIES Irena Kriščiukaitienė1, Virginia Namiotko1, Tomas Baležentis1, Aliaksandr Pakhomau2 1 Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics 2 Central Research Institute for Complex Use of Water Resources of the Republic of Belarus In accordance with the contemporary sustainable water resources use policy in the European Union, it is important to assess the impact of the agricultural sector – one of the most important sources of pollution – upon the implementation of the objectives stipulated by the Water Frame- work Directive. The research therefore aims at analyzing the influence of the agricultural sector on the pollution of the Nemunas river basin. It was the transboundary pollution that forced the research to cover both Lithuanian and Belorussian territories. The paper analyzes legal aspects of the strate- gic management of water resources, estimates the livestock density and dynamics thereof, and iden- tifies the most polluted territories in Lithuania and Belarus. Research results indicate that more in- tensive animal farming is maintained in the Belarusian part of the Nemunas catchment and has the tendency to increase. At the other end of spectrum, LSU per hectare is two times lower and has the tendency to decrease in Lithuania. Keywords: livestock farming, Nemunas catchment, water pollution. JEL codes: Q530, Q150.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Places and Social Capital Supporting Rural Landscape Stewardship: a Pan-European Horizon Scanning
    Copyright © 2021 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Angelstam, P., M. Fedoriak, F. Cruz, J. Muñoz-Rojas, T. Yamelynets, M. Manton, C.-L. Washbourne, D. Dobrynin, Z. Izakovičova, N. Jansson, B. Jaroszewicz, R. Kanka, M. Kavtarishvili, L. Kopperoinen, M. Lazdinis, M. J. Metzger, D. Özüt, D. Pavloska Gjorgjieska, F. J. Sijtsma, N. Stryamets, A. Tolunay, T. Turkoglu, B. Van der Moolen, A. Zagidullina, and A. Zhuk. 2021. Meeting places and social capital supporting rural landscape stewardship: A Pan-European horizon scanning. Ecology and Society 26(1):11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12110-260111 Research Meeting places and social capital supporting rural landscape stewardship: A Pan-European horizon scanning Per Angelstam 1, Mariia Fedoriak 2, Fatima Cruz 3, José Muñoz-Rojas 4, Taras Yamelynets 5, Michael Manton 6, Carla-Leanne Washbourne 7, Denis Dobrynin 8, Zita Izakovičova 9, Nicklas Jansson 10, Bogdan Jaroszewicz 11, Robert Kanka 9, Marika Kavtarishvili 12, Leena Kopperoinen 13, Marius Lazdinis 14, Marc J. Metzger 15, Deniz Özüt 16, Dori Pavloska Gjorgjieska 17, Frans J. Sijtsma 18, Nataliya Stryamets 19,20, Ahmet Tolunay 21, Turkay Turkoglu 22, Bert van der Moolen 23, Asiya Zagidullina 24 and Alina Zhuk 25 ABSTRACT. Achieving sustainable development as an inclusive societal process in rural landscapes, and sustainability in terms of functional green infrastructures for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services, are wicked challenges. Competing claims from various sectors call for evidence-based adaptive collaborative governance. Leveraging such approaches requires maintenance of several forms of social interactions and capitals. Focusing on Pan-European regions with different environmental histories and cultures, we estimate the state and trends of two groups of factors underpinning rural landscape stewardship, namely, (1) traditional rural landscape and novel face-to-face as well as virtual fora for social interaction, and (2) bonding, bridging, and linking forms of social capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impact on Hydropower Resources in Gauged and Ungauged Lithuanian River Catchments
    water Article Climate Change Impact on Hydropower Resources in Gauged and Ungauged Lithuanian River Catchments Darius Jakimaviˇcius*, Gintaras Adžgauskas, Diana Šarauskiene˙ and Jurat¯ e˙ Kriauˇciunien¯ e˙ Laboratory of Hydrology, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos st. 3, LT–444003 Kaunas, Lithuania; [email protected] (G.A.); [email protected] (D.Š.); [email protected] (J.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +370-37-401-965 Received: 21 October 2020; Accepted: 19 November 2020; Published: 21 November 2020 Abstract: Hydropower (potential and kinetic energy) is one of the most important renewable energy sources in the world. This energy is directly dependent on water resources and the hydrological cycle. Ongoing climate changes are likely to influence the availability/amount of this energy resource. The present study explores the relationship between climate changes and river runoff, projects future runoff in both gauged and ungauged river catchments, and then assesses how these alterations may affect the future hydropower resources in Lithuania. Runoff projections of the gauged rivers were evaluated applying Swedish Department of Climate hydrological model, and runoff of ungauged river catchments were estimated by created isoline maps of specific runoff. According to an ensemble of three climate models and two Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios, runoff and hydroelectric energy projections were evaluated for two future periods (2021–2040, 2081–2100). The results demonstrated a decrease in future river runoff. Especially significant changes are expected according to the most pessimistic RCP8.5 scenario at the end of the century. The projected changes are likely to bring a negative effect on hydropower production in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Spatial Planning for Peatland Conservation and Restoration: Europe's Trans-Border Neman River Basin As a Case S
    Article Assessment and Spatial Planning for Peatland Conservation and Restoration: Europe’s Trans-Border Neman River Basin as a Case Study Michael Manton 1,*, Evaldas Makrickas 1, Piotr Banaszuk 2, Aleksander Kołos 2, Andrzej Kamocki 2, Mateusz Grygoruk 3, Marta Stachowicz 3, Leonas Jarašius 4, Nerijus Zableckis 5, Jūratė Sendžikaitė 6, Jan Peters 7, Maxim Napreenko 8, Wendelin Wichtmann 9 and Per Angelstam 10,11 1 Institute of Forest Biology and Silviculture, Faculty of Forest Science and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentu 13, LT-53362 Akademija, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45 E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland; [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (A.K.) 3 Institute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-999 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (M.S.) 4 Foundation for Peatlands Restoration and Conservation, Zirmunu 58-59, LT-09100 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] 5 Lithuanian Fund for Nature, Algirdo 22-3, LT-03218 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Citation: Manton, M.; Makrickas, E.; 6 Institute of Botany, Nature Research Centre, Žaliųjų Ežerų 49, LT-12200 Vilnius, Lithuania; Banaszuk, P.; Kołos, A.; Kamocki, A.; [email protected] 7 Grygoruk, M.; Stachowicz, M.; Michael Succow Foundation, Partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Ellernholzstrasse 1/3, 17489 Greifswald, Germany; [email protected] Jarašius, L.; Zableckis, N.; 8 Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 36, Nahimovskiy Prospekt, Sendžikaitė, J.; et al.
    [Show full text]