Afl Anti-Doping Tribunal Thursday, 18 December 2014 Day Two (Transcript-In-Confidence) - - - -
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Corporate Governance Failings and Performance Enhancing Drugs
A tale of two football codes: Corporate governance failings and performance enhancing drugs Abstract In 2013, two well-known Australian sporting clubs – the Essendon Football Club (AFL) and the Cronulla Sharks Rugby League Club (NRL), were both investigated for performance enhancing drugs in their elite sports science programs. News of the initial investigations was met with disbelief by supporters, players, club administrators and the respective governing bodies – the AFL and the NRL. What followed was a period of intense and rigorous independent investigation by Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) and the AFL and the NRL. In August and December 2013 respectively, severe sanctions were handed down to the Essendon Football Club and the Cronulla Sharks. This paper provides an overview of the background to the saga in each of the respective clubs. It provides a time-line of the events before, during and after the initial investigation by the independent bodies. The paper concludes by linking the events at the respective clubs, to short-comings in a number of important corporate governance practices. Keywords: accountability, corporate governance, international sports associations, crisis, performance enhancing drugs, National Rugby League (NRL), Australian Football League (AFL) 1 A tale of two football codes: Corporate governance failings and performance enhancing drugs 1. Introduction Financial stakes involved in professional sport can create powerful incentives for the use of performance enhancing substances (Rapp 2009). Much empirical evidence supports a strong link between on-field results and club revenues (e.g. Morrow 1999; Barajas, Fernandez- Jardon et al. 2005; Pinnuck and Potter 2006; Bernile and Lyandres 2011; Bell, Brooks et al. -
The Straight Dope: the Inside Story of Sports Biggest Drug Scandal Pdf
FREE THE STRAIGHT DOPE: THE INSIDE STORY OF SPORTS BIGGEST DRUG SCANDAL PDF Chip Le Grand | 277 pages | 01 Nov 2016 | Melbourne University Press | 9780522870275 | English | Carlton, Australia The Straight Dope: Inside Story of Sport's Biggest Drug Scandal Chip Le Grand | eBay Try to Download directly 3. Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. In Februarythen Labor ministers Jason Clare and Kate Lundy lined up at a press conference with the heads of the major sporting codes, and the Australian The Straight Dope: The Inside Story of Sports Biggest Drug Scandal Commission. They delivered a bombshell - announcing that multiple athletes across multiple codes were using illegal, performance enhancing drugs, and that organised crime was involved. Thirty-four current and former Essendon The Straight Dope: The Inside Story of Sports Biggest Drug Scandal are still waiting for their case to be re-heard by the World Anti-Doping Agency, after the AFL tribunal cleared them in March. All three are at play in his new book, The Straight Dope: the inside story of sport's biggest drug scandal. Audio Player failed to load. Play Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. Download The Straight Dope: the inside story of sport's biggest drug scandal 3. It was dubbed 'the blackest day in Australian sport'. Two years on, that black day remains very grey. And in the interim, we've seen reputations trashed, and friendships destroyed. -
Holmesglen Institutional Repository
POSITORY (HIR) Duncan, S.K. (2017). Acting as one: understanding the actions of the banned Essendon 34. Sport in society, 21(3), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1346625 CRICOS Provider Code: 00012G. RTO: 416 B2130518 Document Repository Cov Abstract: In January 2016, 34 past and present players from the Essendon Football Club were found guilty of being injected with banned peptide, Thymosin Beta 4, while participating in Essendon’s supplements program in 2011 and 2012. The release of the Court of Arbitration of Sport’s (CAS) summary of findings raised questions about the actions and intent of the participating players. In particular, the CAS highlighted concerns that the players showed a lack of due diligence and curiosity and acted in a secretive nature. This article seeks to provide a means of understanding the actions of the 34 Essendon players who willingly participated in Essendon Football Club’s supplements program by viewing them as active participants of a community. In doing so it becomes clear that the actions of the Essendon 34 were not unusual, but that a cultural shift within AFL clubs may be needed to ensure a crisis like it never occurs again. Key Words: Essendon, ASADA, AFL, Community, Culture Word Count (excluding references): 8,504 Disclosure statement: No financial interests or benefits have arisen from the direct applications of my research. Acting as one: Understanding the actions of the banned Essendon 34 The Essendon Football Club’s supplements program dominated the Australian Football League (AFL) for over three years. The Court of Arbitration for Sport's (CAS) decision to find 34 Essendon players guilty of doping code violations, along with the release of their summary of findings, has raised questions about the actions and intent of the players. -
CAS 2015/A/4059 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) V
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2015/A/4059 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v. Thomas Bellchambers et al., Australian Football League (AFL) & Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA), award of 11 January 2016 Panel: The Hon. Michael Beloff QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr Romano Subiotto QC (United Kingdom); The Hon. James Spigelman AC QC (Australia) Australian Football Doping (Thymosin Beta-4) Distinction between presence and use of a prohibited substance cases Appeal and answer complete CAS de novo review CAS scope of review Return to training 1. There is a distinction to be made between two forms of anti-doping rule violation. The first form is the presence of a prohibited substance in an athlete’s sample; the second form is use by an athlete of a prohibited substance. Unlike the proof required to establish presence of a prohibited substance, use may also be established by other reliable means such as admissions by the athlete, witness statements, documentary evidence or other analytical information which does not otherwise satisfy all the requirements to establish presence. In a use of a prohibited substance case therefore, the absence of any adverse analytical finding does not prevent the adjudicating body from relying on any other reliable mean to establish the anti-doping rule violation. 2. The provision in Article R56 of the CAS Code purposively construed draws a distinction between reformulating an existing argument and advancing a new and distinctive argument. It is inherent in the forensic process that sometimes a party’s argument is developed and at other times discarded. -
AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Hawthorn Captain Luke Hodge Raises His Arms in Triumph After the Hawks’ Victory in the 2013 Grand Final
AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Hawthorn captain Luke Hodge raises his arms in triumph after the Hawks’ victory in the 2013 Grand Final. AFL ANNUAL REPORT 2013 CONTENTS 3 CONTENTS AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE 117TH ANNUAL REPORT 2013 2013 HIGHLIGHTS �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 CEO’S REPORT ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������21 BROADCASTING, SCHEDULING & INFRASTRUCTURE ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 FOOTBALL OPERATIONS ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������45 COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������62 -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 B. THE INFRACTION NOTICES SERVED ON THE PLAYERS ................................. 3 C. THE INFRACTION NOTICE SERVED ON STEPHEN DANK ................................ 5 C.1. Relevant clauses of the AFL Code ........................................................................ 5 C.2. Specific infractions alleged against Mr Dank ....................................................... 6 D. OUTLINE OF THE CASE OF THE ASADA CEO .................................................... 13 E. OUTLINE OF THE CASE FOR THE 32 PLAYERS ................................................. 14 F. OUTLINE OF THE CASE FOR THE 2 PLAYERS ................................................... 15 G. THE AFL ANTI-DOPING CODE ................................................................................. 16 G.1. Clause 1 - objectives of the 2010 Code ............................................................... 16 G.2. Clause 2 – definitions in the 2010 Code ............................................................. 16 G.3. Clause 3 - Application of the 2010 Code ............................................................ 17 G.4. Clause 5 – Prohibited Classes of Substances and Prohibited Methods ............... 17 G.5. Clause 6 – The WADA Prohibited List .............................................................. 18 G.6. Clause 11 – Anti Doping Rule Violations .......................................................... -
We Never Want to Forget That We Are a Football Club
Swinburne Leadership Institute http://swinburne.edu.au/leadership-institute Leadership in the AFL and the supplements scandal at Essendon Football Club Presentation notes by Karen Farquharson Associate Dean (Research) Faculty of Life and Social Sciences (Swinburne Leadership Dialogue 27 September 2013) Copyright owned by Swinburne University of Technology. Permission for limited re-use is provided under the terms of the Australian Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ Introduction: the use of drugs at Essendon Football Club In February of this year it came to light that Essendon Football Club was being investigated by the Australian Crime Commission and by ASADA, The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, for a supplements program it had implemented the previous year. The supplements, intended to improve players' post match recovery, were either banned or not approved for human consumption. According to media reports, these banned substances were injected into players on numerous occasions. Today I will be discussing competence in leadership in Australian Football League (AFL) football clubs. Based on research I am doing with Tim Marjoribanks, I will put forward a framework for understanding how club leaders come to be seen as competent. I will argue that competence is the outcome of within-club leadership contests around knowledge and power in a context of increasing professionalisation and regulation. I will also argue that in AFL football, having football experience is an important aspect of competence. After I present the framework I will use it to try to understand how Essendon, an old, successful and well- regarded club, became entangled in controversy over its supplements program. -
Afl Anti-Doping Tribunal Friday, 19 December 2014 Day Three (Transcript-In-Confidence) - - - -
AFL ANTI-DOPING TRIBUNAL FRIDAY, 19 DECEMBER 2014 DAY THREE (TRANSCRIPT-IN-CONFIDENCE) - - - - - CHAIRMAN: MR DAVID JONES MR JOHN NIXON MR WAYNE HENWOOD COUNSEL ASSISTING: MR JUSTIN HOOPER - - - - - MR J. GLEESON QC with MS R. ENBOM appeared on behalf of AFL. MR M. HOLMES QC with MR P. KNOWLES appeared on behalf of the CEO of ASADA. MR D. GRACE QC with MR B. IHLE appeared on behalf of 32 players. MR N. CLELLAND QC with MR S. NORTON appeared on behalf of Mr and Mr - - - - - 1 CHAIRMAN: Good morning. We are ready to proceed. Could 2 I just indicate that Mr Abrahams asked Mr Hooper whether 3 he could have a copy of the transcript in relation to the 4 time that he was here for the purposes of his application. 5 My initial reaction was to think, "Oh, that's probably all 6 right." But, having gone through it, I have sort of 7 thought differently about that in terms of not so 8 much - I'm not in any way reflecting anything on 9 Mr Abrahams, but I'm just a bit concerned about where the 10 transcript gets to beyond there, bearing in mind what we 11 continue to read in the press. So what I thought was, if 12 there was agreement from the Bar table, that perhaps we 13 could give him a transcript of the ruling and I think 14 that's quite - there's nothing in that. 15 MR GRACE: We agree. 16 MR HOLMES: We agree also. 17 CHAIRMAN: So we will let him have the transcript of the 18 ruling, but otherwise we won't make it available.