Hamilton's Waste Review 2016 Table of Contents – Volume 5
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I
Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I CBER Contract Report 121 Client report prepared for Hamilton City Council by Toni S. Cornes, Rachel E. Thomson, Bruce D. Clarkson Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand May 31st 2012 Email: [email protected] i ii Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Report Context and Overview...................................................................................................... 2 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Hamilton City Boundaries ................................................................................................................ 3 Ecology of Hamilton ......................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Geology ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Landforms and Vegetation Types ................................................................................................ 4 Fauna of Hamilton -
Blue Chip New Zealand Limited Creditors List
Blue Chip New Zealand Limited (In Liquidation) Creditors Known at Liquidation March 2008 Page 1 Label Mailing Mailing Mailing Street Mailing Mailing Mailing Suburb Mailing City Mailing Mailing Country Mailing Unit Street Name Street Type Rural State Post Number Number Delivery Code 1 Limited C/- Lvl 6, Broadway Road Newmarket Auckland New Zealand Gilligan 135 Rowe&A s 14-28 Developments Ltd 28a Balliol Avenue Pirimai Napier New Zealand Addison Park Limited P O Box 534 Cambridge New Zealand Adrian Lewis, Brittbradd Investments 119 Dalrymple Street Invercargill New Zealand Ltd Air New Zealand Private Bag 92007 Auckland New Zealand Bay of Plenty Rugby Union (Inc) PO Box 4058 Mount New Zealand Maunganui South BDO Spicers PO Box 2219 Auckland New Zealand Blakelock Property Investments 6/ 33 Kay Drive Blockhouse Bay Auckland New Zealand Limited Bogardus Property Investments 6 Sir George Back Street Opua Northland New Zealand Limited Booker/Herrold Partnership P O Box 1094 Pukekohe Auckland New Zealand Bribanc Property Group Ltd (In PO Box 2951 Shortland Street Auckland New Zealand Liquidation) Buddle Findlay PO Box 1433 Auckland New Zealand C Kwan F3 30 Frederick Street Doncaster VIC Australia 3108 Chapman Tripp PO Box 2206 Auckland New Zealand D & P Murray Property Investments 4 Mission Street Tauranga New Zealand Limited D Walecki & Mrs. E Walecki PO Box Panmure Auckland New Zealand 14668 Dhuez Limited P O Box 3142 Shortland Street Auckland New Zealand Digitel Communications Ltd PO Box 8161 Symonds Street Auckland New Zealand DLA Phillips Fox PO Box 2791 Wellington New Zealand Dr. A Wilkinson-Mackie & Dr. K 8 Headland Farm Road RD4 Whangarei New Zealand 0174 Wilkinson-Mackie Park Dr. -
Submission on Publicly Notified District Plan
Submission on Publicly Notified District Plan Clause 6 of Schedule 1, Resource Management Act 1991 To: Hamilton City Council Date: 29/3/2013 Submission method: on-line Submission number: 305 Submitter Details: Company Email id: [email protected] Contact Name: The Waikato Tree Trust Name: The Waikato Tree Trust Address: c/- 26 Eton Drive, Hillcrest, Hamilton, 3216, New Zealand Phone daytime: 64 07 8566563 Mobile: I wish to be heard in support of my submission. If others make a similar submission, I will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing. I could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission. This is a submission on the Hamilton City Council Proposed District Plan (the Proposal): The specific Support, My submission is: I seek the following decision from the local authority: provision(s) of Oppose the proposal or that my Support submission in part relates to is: 20.1 Purpose Support Note; We would appreciate for "Purpose", that it would c) The sites are identified on the Planning Maps and are listed in Schedule 9C: in part be desirable to comment specifically identifying the Long Significant Natural Areas in Volume 2, Appendix 9. The significance of a site is tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculata) population within the based on the ecological significance of its indigenous vegetation. The sites were city as this is a unique fauna characteristic of the city. We assessed using the criteria for determining significant indigenous vegetation and also seek that where possilbe when there is inclusion in significant habitats of indigenous fauna contained in the Regional Policy Statement (2000). -
Waikato Realmap Exam
KAY RD WNS SHERWOOD DO D Y S R N LAR M 1 D AY2 O 3 4 SI5L S Y R K RT A E A H CI IN S A K 112 A H D T 167 L S N Y LEN O O R B 1 W T D K B MO U E AH T Y NTGO L RI R T ICK IKA Gower Park MER V S DW TE T YC Y I A A A G RE E C H D N ST S R R E E R R N G S W C V SC LOR LIM WI D LIMBER HILL AM E ST NG H TO HE S A S CLOW CR CRE TE NHAM E G ES B H 166EC SILK N AD DE A JO E VIK C H L R STER IN S G ATHAM W ST T H O Y RAWLINGS VE B C BEATT RY GAL OD ER O 89 E P N BO L A R LIS SYL O RM T ER V E NT M RD 85 B L E A BORMAN AN A S AM A 91 N R TAW P H N RE R L 190 T D OD WI H D R161I D AN A O P RILE 179 D H N E WA SOLUTION W G M ETTE ST N W WOBURN E IRON EATHER R S AC E AQUILA U O HFORD I E O F Y C H IC N M M DN T I LANCEW N E O C W E H R 108 V C Y M 80 O E T I C O RC A RTF O S C U N C A R NORRIE K UM A T H 171 N WNS R W IN UKES B BE LIG 185R OR R R A E HT Y B D N E R I NEY PL E R DRV O E NA S E 174 E R ST L B L B S PL G KILLEGRAY LLONA W M EL R N L PINE S A T A AN D E M E DSON ST R ND C T D H ASHTO OO STEWART P K A E WEST S EV V E 102 U L S L E I C NT E I S VIVIAN RMONTC ST L I T E A A R G T H P KUPE GO A TUIRANGI R A O D A MINSTER H S M FORD WAKE L R D ICHAR N RRS L Pukete B Y F I E A W V I D MANOR A MCKEE ST D D R T S T R RSHAM DOR N G FILMER MAHOE ST R E R 81 IS L H R D TOBE A RIVER RD E M HORI NIDAD A O THE FORD O E COVENT W Farm Park T E N R T PRISK ST P U A E N TRI ING DOC Y LI H B A G IE O A CAROLYN A I N N V T R S 172 I IA A E L H B P DIOM E AR R R G A W D V IT Y 92 R E F D Mahoe N L O R D A A ER A U T A 68 T TE HUIA Z M NM P RK O R K E E R GRACE -
Waikato Regional Pest Management Strategy Annual Report 2004/2005
Environment Waikato Technical Report 2005/56 Waikato Regional Pest Management Strategy Annual Report 2004/2005 Prepared by: Biosecurity Group For: Environment Waikato PO Box 4010 HAMILTON EAST ISSN: 1172-4005 September 15, 2005 Document #1007534 Chairman’s comment The Waikato Regional Pest Management Strategy was developed under the Biosecurity Act 1993. The Act allows regional councils to develop a range of initiatives to tackle pest problems that are specific to each Region. I take pleasure from the significant gains that have been made in Regional biosecurity. Highlights for the 2004/2005 year include possum control work in the Hakarimata Range (near Ngaruawahia) and Punga Punga Wetland (near Mercer). Partnership programmes with forestry companies and the Department of Conservation have been a great feature of projects to control climbing spindleberry and spartina, respectively. A new ten-year resource consent to help manage alligator weed across the Region was obtained. A real co-ordinated effort between a number of agencies can now be made to control this highly invasive pest. The high level of compliance with Strategy rules and the increasing amount of work we undertake to enhance the biodiversity of the Region has also made this year a success. The number of community possum control schemes is growing and there is increasing awareness of their value in catchment management, as well as for biosecurity and biodiversity outcomes. The growth of these community rated schemes and other partnerships are recognition of the attitude and industry of Environment Waikato’s staff and contractors. I congratulate those who are involved in the implementation of the Strategy.