DOCSLIB.ORG

Shad and River Herring Management Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Shad and River Herring Management Board February 4, 2021 8:30 – 11:30 a.m. Webinar Draft Agenda The times listed are approximate; the order in which these items will be taken is subject to change; other items may be added as necessary. 1. Welcome/Call to Order (M. Armstrong) 8:30 a.m. 2. Board Consent 8:30 a.m. • Approval of Agenda • Approval of Proceedings from August 2020 3. Public Comment 8:35 a.m. 4. Consider Management Response to the 2020 Shad Benchmark Assessment 8:45 a.m. and Peer Review (M. Armstrong) • Review Technical Committee Recommendations (B. Neilan) • Advisory Panel Report (P. Lyons Gromen) 5. Review Technical Committee Recommendations on Improvements to 9:30 a.m. Amendments 2 and 3 (B. Neilan) Possible Action 6. Break 10:30 a.m. 7. Consider Shad Habitat Plan Updates Action 10:45 a.m. • Review Technical Committee Recommendations (B. Neilan) 8. Consider Fishery Management Plan Review and State Compliance for the 11:10 a.m. 2019 Fishing Year (C. Starks) Action 9. Review and Populate Advisory Panel Membership (T. Berger) Action 11:25 a.m. 10. Other Business/Adjourn 11:30 a.m. This meeting will be held via webinar, click here for details. Sustainable and Cooperative Management of Atlantic Coastal Fisheries MEETING OVERVIEW Shad and River Herring Management Board February 4, 2021 8:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Webinar Chair: Mike Armstrong (MA) Technical Committee Chair: Law Enforcement Committee Assumed Chairmanship: 10/19 Brian Neilan (NJ) Representative: L.Furlong (PA) Vice Chair: Advisory Panel Chair: Previous Board Meeting: Justin Davis Pam Lyons Gromen August 4, 2020 Voting Members: ME, NH, MA, RI, CT, NY, NJ, PA, DE, MD, DC, PRFC, VA, NC, SC, GA, FL, NMFS, USFWS (19 votes) 2. Board Consent • Approval of Agenda • Approval of Proceedings from August 2020 3. Public Comment – At the beginning of the meeting public comment will be taken on items not on the agenda. Individuals that wish to speak at this time must sign-in at the beginning of the meeting. For agenda items that have already gone out for public hearing and/or have had a public comment period that has closed, the Board Chair may determine that additional public comment will not provide additional information. In this circumstance the Chair will not allow additional public comment on an issue. For agenda items that the public has not had a chance to provide input, the Board Chair may allow limited opportunity for comment. The Board Chair has the discretion to limit the number of speakers and/or the length of each comment. 4. Consider Management Response to the 2020 American Shad Benchmark Stock Assessment (8:45-9:30 a.m.) Background • The American Shad 2020 Benchmark Stock Assessment and Peer Review Report was accepted for management use in August 2020. The assessment found that American shad remain depleted on a coastwide basis, likely due to multiple factors, such as fishing mortality, inadequate fish passage at dams, predation, pollution, habitat degradation, and climate change. • At the August 2020 meeting, the Board tasked the Technical Committee (TC) with identifying potential paths forward to improve shad stocks given the results of the stock assessment. The TC met several times in the fall of 2020 and early 2021 to develop recommendations to address the Board Task (Briefing Materials). • The Advisory Panel met twice to consider the recommendations of the TC and provide additional input for Board consideration (Supplemental Materials). Presentations • Technical Committee Recommendations by B. Neilan • Advisory Panel Report by P. Lyons Gromen Board actions for consideration at this meeting • Consider management response to the assessment and peer review 5. Review Technical Committee Recommendations on Improvements to Amendments 2 and 3 (9:30-10:30 a.m.) Possible Action Background • In October 2017 the TC identified several inconsistencies between state SFMPs and the requirements of Amendments 2 and 3. Subsequently, the Board tasked the TC to develop proposed improvements to the Amendments with regard to several items: 1) Management and monitoring of rivers with low abundance and harvest of shad and river herring; 2) Standardization of Sustainable Fishery Management Plan (SFMP) requirements; 3) Incorporation of stock assessment information into SFMPs and discussion on the timeline for renewing plans; 4) Clarification of de minimis requirements as they pertain to SFMPs; and 5) Review of the number of years of data required before developing a SFMP. • The Technical Committee met a number of times throughout 2020 to develop and finalize a list of recommendations to address each of the focus areas identified in the Board task (Briefing Materials). Presentations • Technical Committee Recommendations on Improvements to Amendments 2 and 3 by B. Neilan Board actions for consideration at this meeting • Consider initiating a management action to address the TC recommendations 6. Break (10:30-10:45 p.m.) 7. Consider Shad Habitat Plan Updates (10:45-11:10 a.m.) Action Background • Amendment 3 to the Shad and River Herring FMP requires all states and jurisdictions to submit a habitat plan for American shad. A majority of the habitat plans were approved by the Board in February 2014, and it was anticipated that they would be updated every five years. • The states began the process of reviewing their American shad habitat plans and making updates in 2020, however, many states encountered delays due to COVID-19. The states that have submitted updated habitat plans for Board consideration are: ME, NH, MD, NC SC, and GA (Briefing Materials). The remaining states will provide their updated plans to the TC for review before the next Board meeting. • The TC reviewed and recommends approval of these updated plans. Presentations • Shad Habitat Plan Updates for Board Consideration by B. Neilan Board actions for consideration at this meeting • Consider approval of updated shad habitat plans 8. Consider Fishery Management Plan Review and State Compliance for the 2019 Fishing Year (11:10-11:25 a.m.) Action Background • State Compliance Reports were due on July 1, 2019 • The Plan Review Team reviewed each state report and compiled the annual FMP Review (Briefing Materials). 2 Presentations • Overview of the FMP Review Report by C. Starks Board actions for consideration at this meeting • Approve FMP Review for 2019 fishing year, state compliance reports, and de minimis requests 9. Review and Populate Advisory Panel Membership (11:25-11:30 a.m.) Action Background • Two individuals have been nominated to the Shad and River Herring Advisory Panel: Dr. Ed Hale of University of Delaware Sea Grant, and Eric Roach, a recreational angler from New Hampshire (Briefing Materials). Presentations • Nominations by T. Berger Board Actions for Consideration at the Meeting • Approve Shad and River Herring Advisory Panel nominations 10. Other Business/Adjourn 3 Shad and River Herring 2021 TC Tasks Activity level: Medium Committee Overlap Score: Medium (Multi-species committees for this Board) Committee Task List • Development of recommendations related to Board task on improving shad stocks • Spring 2020: Updates to state Shad Habitat Plans • Annual state compliance reports due July 1 TC Members: Mike Brown (ME), Mike Dionne (NH), Brad Chase (MA), Patrick McGee (RI), Jacque Benway Roberts (CT), Wes Eakin (Vice Chair, NY), Brian Neilan (Chair, NJ), Josh Tryninewski (PA), Johnny Moore (DE), Rob Bourdon (MD), Ellen Cosby (PRFC), Joseph Swann (DC), Eric Hilton (VA), Holly White (NC), Jeremy McCargo (NC), Bill Post (SC), Jim Page (GA), Reid Hyle (FL), Ken Sprankle (USFWS), Ruth Hass-Castro (NOAA) Shad SAS: Michael Bailey (Chair, USFWS), Ken Sprankle (TC Chair, USFWS-CT), Joey Ballenger (SC), Mike Bednarski (VA), Wes Eakin (NY), Kevin Sullivan (NH), Joe Zydlewski (USGS), Jacque Benway-Roberts (CT), Kiersten Curti (NOAA-Fisheries), Angela Giuliano (MD), Jason Boucher (DE) DRAFT PROCEEDINGS OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION SHAD AND RIVER HERRING MANAGEMENT BOARD Webinar August 4, 2020 These minutes are draft and subject to approval by Shad and River Herring Management Board. The Board will review the minutes during its next meeting. Draft Proceedings of the Shad and River Herring Management Board Meeting Webinar August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Call to Order, Chairman Mike Armstrong ................................................................................................................... 1 Approval of Agenda ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Approval of Proceedings from October 2019 ............................................................................................................. 1 Public Comment .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Consider 2020 Shad Benchmark Stock Assessment .................................................................................................. 1 Presentation of the Stock Assessment Report ......................................................................................................... 1 Presentation of Peer Review Panel Report ............................................................................................................... 7 Consider Acceptance of Benchmark Stock Assessment and Peer Review Report for Management Use. .... 27 Consider
Recommended publications
  • Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon

    Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon

    0# North West Branch St John T11 R15 WELS T11 R17 WELS T11 R16 WELS T11 R14 WELS T11 R13 WELS T11 R12 WELS T11 R11 WELS T11 R10 WELS T11 R9 WELS T11 R8 WELS Aroostook River Oxbow Smith Farm DamXW St John River T11 R7 WELS Garfield Plt T11 R4 WELS Chapman Ashland Machias River Stream Carry Brook Chemquasabamticook Stream Squa Pan Stream XW Daaquam River XW Whitney Bk Dam Mars Hill Squa Pan Dam Burntland Stream DamXW Westfield Prestile Stream Presque Isle Stream FRESH WAY, INC Allagash River South Branch Machias River Big Ten Twp T10 R16 WELS T10 R15 WELS T10 R14 WELS T10 R13 WELS T10 R12 WELS T10 R11 WELS T10 R10 WELS T10 R9 WELS T10 R8 WELS 0# MARS HILL UTILITY DISTRICT T10 R3 WELS Water District Resevoir Dam T10 R7 WELS T10 R6 WELS Masardis Squapan Twp XW Mars Hill DamXW Mule Brook Penobscot RiverYosungs Lakeh DamXWed0# Southwest Branch St John Blackwater River West Branch Presque Isle Strea Allagash River North Branch Blackwater River East Branch Presque Isle Strea Blaine Churchill Lake DamXW Southwest Branch St John E Twp XW Robinson Dam Prestile Stream S Otter Brook L Saint Croix Stream Cox Patent E with Licensed Dischargers and W Snare Brook T9 R8 WELS 8 T9 R17 WELS T9 R16 WELS T9 R15 WELS T9 R14 WELS 1 T9 R12 WELS T9 R11 WELS T9 R10 WELS T9 R9 WELS Mooseleuk Stream Oxbow Plt R T9 R13 WELS Houlton Brook T9 R7 WELS Aroostook River T9 R4 WELS T9 R3 WELS 9 Chandler Stream Bridgewater T T9 R5 WELS TD R2 WELS Baker Branch Critical UmScolcus Stream lmon Habitat Overlay South Branch Russell Brook Aikens Brook West Branch Umcolcus Steam LaPomkeag Stream West Branch Umcolcus Stream Tie Camp Brook Soper Brook Beaver Brook Munsungan Stream S L T8 R18 WELS T8 R17 WELS T8 R16 WELS T8 R15 WELS T8 R14 WELS Eagle Lake Twp T8 R10 WELS East Branch Howe Brook E Soper Mountain Twp T8 R11 WELS T8 R9 WELS T8 R8 WELS Bloody Brook Saint Croix Stream North Branch Meduxnekeag River W 9 Turner Brook Allagash Stream Millinocket Stream T8 R7 WELS T8 R6 WELS T8 R5 WELS Saint Croix Twp T8 R3 WELS 1 Monticello R Desolation Brook 8 St Francis Brook TC R2 WELS MONTICELLO HOUSING CORP.
  • Lidar and Other Evidence for the Southwest Continuation and Late Quaternary Reactivation of the Norumbega Fault System and a Cr

    Lidar and Other Evidence for the Southwest Continuation and Late Quaternary Reactivation of the Norumbega Fault System and a Cr

    LIDAR and other evidence for the southwest continuation and Late Quaternary reactivation of the Norumbega Fault System and a cross-cutting structure near Biddeford, Maine, USA Ronald T . Marple1 and James D. Hurd, Jr .2 1. 403 Wickersham Avenue, Fort Benning, Georgia 31905, USA 2. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Connecticut, 1376 Storrs Road, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-4087, USA Corresponding author <[email protected]> Date received: 14 April 2019 ¶ Date accepted: 01 September 2019 ABSTRACT High-resolution LiDAR (light detection and ranging) images reveal numerous NE-SW-trending geomorphic lineaments that may represent the southwest continuation of the Norumbega fault system (NFS) along a broad, 30- to 50-km-wide zone of brittle faults that continues at least 100 km across southern Maine and southeastern New Hampshire. These lineaments are characterized by linear depressions and valleys, linear drainage patterns, abrupt bends in rivers, and linear scarps. The Nonesuch River, South Portland, and Mackworth faults of the NFS appear to continue up to 100 km southwest of the Saco River along prominent but discontinuous LiDAR lineaments. Southeast-facing scarps that cross drumlins along some of the lineaments in southern Maine suggest that late Quaternary displacements have occurred along these lineaments. Several NW-SE-trending geomorphic features and geophysical lineaments near Biddeford, Maine, may represent a 30-km-long, NW-SE-trending structure that crosses part of the NFS. Brittle NW- SE-trending, pre-Triassic faults in the Kittery Formation at Biddeford Pool, Maine, support this hypothesis. RÉSUMÉ Des images haute résolution prises par LiDAR (détection et télémétrie par ondes lumineuses) dévoilent de nombreux linéaments orientés du NE vers le SO qui pourraient représenter la continuité au sud-ouest du système de failles de Norumbega (SFN) le long d’une vaste zone de 30 à 50 km de largeur de failles cassantes qui se poursuit sur au moins 100 km à travers le sud du Maine et le sud-est du New Hampshire.
  • Help DSF Achieve Significant Landmarks Small Property, Big Impact

    Help DSF Achieve Significant Landmarks Small Property, Big Impact

    *In-ter-vale n. [a blending of INTERVAL + VALE] [Americanism, Chiefly New England] low, flat land between hills or along a river. Webster’s New World Dictionary PROTECTING RIVERS AND WILD ATLANTIC SALMON SINCE 1982 Downeast Salmon Federation P.O. Box 201 Columbia Falls, Maine 04623 INTERVALE D OWNEAST S ALMON F E D ERATION Spring 2019 Documenting the Success of MEANDERS “Choosing to save a river is the Peter Gray Parr Project more often an act of passion than of careful calculation. You make the choice because the river has touched your life in an intimate and irreversible way, because you are unwilling to accept its loss." — David Bolling Photo credit: Keith Williams Help DSF Achieve Thank You to Our ince 2012, over 1 million fall Atlantic Salmon migrate erratic environmental Major Business parr (juvenile Atlantic Salmon) from the rivers to the sea) conditions. In 2018, the Shave been raised in the Peter populations resulting from the estimated total production Significant Landmarks Partners Gray Hatchery and released into PGPP are 4 times higher than was 0.73 smolt per unit of e have been very busy at DSF this events over the last year. There are the East Machias River. During smolt populations generated habitat, increasing from Wpast winter! From our community plans to add several more events this time period, the watershed from other stocking methods; 0.39 at the start of the PGPP; outreach events to our wild Atlantic throughout 2019. You can see experienced record-setting heat, • Age distribution of the PGPP • The neighboring Narraguagus Salmon hatcheries, we are constantly our upcoming schedule at www.
  • Up and Up: River Herring in Eastern Maine

    Up and Up: River Herring in Eastern Maine

    DOWNEAST FISHERIES PARTNERSHIP 2019 Up and up: River Herring in Eastern Maine PREPARED BY Anne Hayden, Medea Steinman, and Rachel Gorich This report is also available online at: downeastfisheries.org OUR PARTNERS coa.edu downeastinstitute.org mainesalmonrivers.org coastalfisheries.org mcht.org mainefarmlandtrust.org seagrant.umaine.edu manomet.org sunrisecounty.org wccog.net Contents 2 Introduction 2 Challenges for River Herring 4 What can be done? 5 What are River Herring? 6 Benefits of River Herring? 7 Managment 9 Status in 2018 11 Restoration Activities in Eastern Maine 14 Case Studies in River Herring Restoration 14 Bagaduce River 17 Patten Stream 17 Union River OUR PARTNERS 18 Narraguagus River 18 East Machias River 21 Orange River 21 Pennamaquan River 22 St. Croix River 23 Looking Ahead DOWNEAST FISHERIES parTNERSHIP / UP AND UP: RIVER HerrING IN EASTERN MAINE 1 Introduction River herring runs in eastern Maine are coming back! A string of successful projects, from the opening of the St. Croix fishway to the renewal of commercial fishing on Card Mill Stream in Franklin, have fueled growing momentum for restoration of rivers and streams, big and small. This report is an update on the status of river herring runs in eastern Maine. It describes the value of river herring and some of the many projects underway to allow river herring to swim upstream to their spawning habitat. Because river herring are a keystone species in freshwater and marine systems—and are so responsive to restoration efforts—they have become a focus of the Downeast Fisheries Partnership effort to restore fisheries in eastern Maine.
  • Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal

    Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal

    A Research Paper by Dam Removal: Case Studies on the Fiscal, Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal October 2016 <Year> Dam Removal: Case Studies on the Fiscal, Economic, Social, and Environmental Benefits of Dam Removal October 2016 PUBLISHED ONLINE: http://headwaterseconomics.org/economic-development/local-studies/dam-removal-case-studies ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group whose mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. CONTACT INFORMATION Megan Lawson, Ph.D.| [email protected] | 406-570-7475 P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 http://headwaterseconomics.org Cover Photo: Whittenton Pond Dam, Mill River, Massachusetts. American Rivers. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 MEASURING THE BENEFITS OF DAM REMOVAL ........................................................................................... 2 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................. 5 CASE STUDIES WHITTENTON POND DAM, MILL RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS ........................................................................ 11 ELWHA AND GLINES CANYON DAMS, ELWHA RIVER, WASHINGTON ........................................................ 14 EDWARDS DAM, KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE ...............................................................................................
  • Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar)

    Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar)

    Final Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) November, 2005 Prepared by NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Silver Spring, Maryland and Northeastern Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, Massachusetts Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) November, 2005 Prepared by NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Silver Spring, Maryland and Northeastern Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Hadley, Massachusetts Approved: Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Date NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate actions that are thought to be necessary to recover andlor protect endangered species. Recovery plans are prepared by NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies and others. This Recovery Plan for the Gulf of Maine (GOM) Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) was prepared by the staff of the Northeast Regional Offices of NMFS with the assistance of the FWS and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission (ASC). While the State of Maine provided recommendations for this plan, it was developed using federal guidelines and policies pertaining to recovery plans for federally listed species. Recovery plans are not regulatory or decision documents. The recommendations in a recovery plan are not considered final decisions unless and until they are actually proposed for implementation. Objectives will only be attained and hnds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities and other budgetary constraints.
  • Critical Habitat

    Critical Habitat

    Biological valuation of Atlantic salmon habitat within the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment Biological assessment of specific areas currently occupied by the species; and determination of whether critical habitat in specific areas outside the currently occupied range is deemed essential to the conservation of the species NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Regional Office 1 Blackburn Drive Gloucester, MA. 01930 2009 Foreword: Atlantic salmon life history........................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: Methods and Procedures for Biological Valuation of Atlantic Salmon Habitat in the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment (GOM DPS).......................................................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Identifying the Geographical Area Occupied by the Species and Specific Areas within the Geographical Area ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species essential to the conservation of the species .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Identify those “Physical
  • Penobscot River 2007 Data Report July 2008

    Penobscot River 2007 Data Report July 2008

    Penobscot River 2007 Data Report July 2008 Prepared by Donald Albert, P. E. Bureau of Land and Water Quality Division of Environmental Assessment DEPLW-0882 Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 Technical Design of Study ....................................................................................................1 Hydrologic Data ....................................................................................................................4 Ambient Chemical Data ........................................................................................................4 -DO, Temperature and Salinity .............................................................................................5 -Ultimate BOD ......................................................................................................................8 -Phosphorus Series ................................................................................................................11 -Nitrogen Series.....................................................................................................................13 -Chlorophyll-a .......................................................................................................................15 -Secchi disk transparency......................................................................................................17 Effluent Chemical Data .........................................................................................................18
  • On-Going Construction in 2013 & Projects That Will Carry Forward

    On-Going Construction in 2013 & Projects That Will Carry Forward

    Maine Turnpike Authority DRAFT-As of May 8th, 2013 Greater Portland Area Major Maintenance & Capital Improvement Projects for 2013 & 2014 On-Going Construction in 2013 & Projects That Will Carry Forward Hurricane Road Over Piscataqua River Bridge Repair & Hurricane Road Underpass Bridge Repair – 2013: The Hurricane Road Bridges over the Piscataqua River and the mainline will be closed for up to 12 weeks during the summer of 2013 for bridge joint, bridge deck and substructure repairs. Scott Construction of Falmouth, Maine was awarded a $820,000 contract for this work. Blackstrap Rd Bridge Rehabilitation & Falmouth Interchange Exit 52 Bridge – 2013: Blackstrap Road Bridge will be raised and the existing concrete deck will be replaced. The bridge will be closed from June - November 2013. Exit 52 bridge will also be raised and the existing concrete deck will be partially replaced. The bridge and southbound on and off ramps are expected to be closed for a week in May 2013. The off ramp will remain closed until November. Any necessary detours will be coordinated with the City of Falmouth, the City of Portland, and the MaineDOT. CPM Constructors of Freeport, Maine was awarded a $3.5 million contract for this work. Presumpscot River Bridge Rehabilitation – 2013 (Continued): The bridges over the Presumpscot River on the Falmouth Spur are being rehabilitated with a new concrete deck and other superstructure and substructure repairs. This 18 month project, which began in 2012, will have the Falmouth Spur down to one lane in both directions through fall 2013, though impacts to traffic should be minimal. In 2012, Lane Construction of Bangor, Maine was awarded the $3.2 million contract for this work.
  • Notice to Flood Insurance Study Users

    Notice to Flood Insurance Study Users

    LINCOLN COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Lincoln County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER Alna, Town of 230083 Monhegan Plantation 230511 Bar Island 230916 Newcastle, Town of 230218 Boothbay, Town of 230212 Nobleboro, Town of 230219 Boothbay Harbor, Town of 230213 Polins Ledges Island 230929 Bremen, Town of 230214 Ross Island 230922 Bristol, Town of 230215 Somerville, Town of 230512 Damariscotta, Town of 230216 South Bristol, Town of 230220 Dresden, Town of 230084 Southport, Town of 230221 Edgecomb, Town of 230217 Thief Island 230920 Haddock Island 230918 Thrumcap Island 230928 Hibberts Gore, Township of 230712 Waldoboro, Town of 230086 Hungry Island 230917 Webber Dry Ledge Island 230930 Indian Island 230919 Western Egg Rock Island 230926 Jefferson, Town of 230085 Westport, Town of 230222 Jones Garden Island 230925 Whitefield, Town of 230087 Killick Stone Island 230927 Wiscasset, Town of 230223 Louds Island 230915 Wreck Island 230924 Marsh Island 230921 Wreck Island Ledge 230923 PRELIMINARY DATE: February 7, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23015CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report.
  • Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser Oxyrinchus

    Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser Oxyrinchus

    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus St. Lawrence populations Maritimes populations in Canada THREATENED 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 49 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Robert Campbell for writing the provisional status report on the Atlantic Sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus. The contractor’s involvement with the writing of the status report ended with the acceptance of the provisional report. Any modifications to the status report during the subsequent preparation of the 6-month interim and 2-month interim status report were overseen by Dr. Eric Taylor, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee Co-Chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur l'esturgeon noir (Acipenser oxyrinchus) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Atlantic Sturgeon — from Cornell University Department of Natural Resources by permission. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/636-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18706-8 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2011 Common name Atlantic Sturgeon - St.
  • Natural Resources Chapter

    Natural Resources Chapter

    Natural Resources Chapter (For review – September 8, 2015) Vision: Richmond residents are responsible stewards of our natural resources, including open space, forest, water bodies and wetlands. We balance growth and development with the preservation, promotion and continued accessibility of our resources for recreation, wildlife habitat, agriculture, and scenic values. Introduction This chapter provides a summary about the natural systems which comprise Richmond’s physical environment. The following areas will be discussed to determine how our natural features relate to the overall health and vitality of the town and its future development and land use patterns: geology, topography, soils, surface and ground water, land cover, and unique natural areas and wildlife habitat. A realistic assessment and appreciation of our environmental features will allow us to both identify constraints on development and to identify areas appropriate for development where negative impacts to natural resources are minimal and costs are lower for construction. The town’s natural resources are regulated by a combination of federal, state and local laws and regulations and often address the same feature. Some resources require multiple levels of review and approval before land development may occur while others are less restrictive. The information provided in this chapter is designed to help the community understand its natural resources and make sure land use planning and development occurs in such a way that future generations can enjoy the values and beauty of the town. Watersheds Richmond is divided into eight major watersheds, each with its own physical characteristics, natural environments and patterns of development. All of the land area within the town eventually drains into the Kennebec River.