(Ichthyosaura Alpestris) Husbandry Guidelines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
<I>Ichthyosaura Alpestris</I>
Volume 26 (January 2016), 49–56 FULL PAPER Herpetological Journal Published by the British Provenance of Ichthyosaura alpestris (Caudata: Herpetological Society Salamandridae) introductions to France and New Zealand assessed by mitochondrial DNA analysis Jan W. Arntzen1, Tania M. King2, Mathieu Denoël3, Iñigo Martínez-Solano4,5 & Graham P. Wallis2 1Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 2Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand 3Behavioural Biology Unit, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of Liège, Quai van Beneden 22, 4020 Liège, Belgium 4CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, s/n 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal 5(present address) Ecology, Evolution, and Development Group, Department of Wetland Ecology, Doñana Biological Station, CSIC, c/ Americo Vespucio, s/n, 41092, Seville, Spain The last century has seen an unparalleled movement of species around the planet as a direct result of human activity, which has been a major contributor to the biodiversity crisis. Amphibians represent a particularly vulnerable group, exacerbated by the devastating effects of chytrid fungi. We report the malicious translocation and establishment of the alpine newt (Ichthyosaura alpestris) to its virtual antipode in North Island of New Zealand. We use network analysis of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes to identify the original source population as I. a. apuana from Tuscany, Italy. Additionally, a population in southern France, presumed to be introduced, is identified as I. a. alpestris from western Europe. However, the presence of two differentiated haplotypes suggests a mixed origin. -
Stem Caecilian from the Triassic of Colorado Sheds Light on the Origins
Stem caecilian from the Triassic of Colorado sheds light PNAS PLUS on the origins of Lissamphibia Jason D. Pardoa, Bryan J. Smallb, and Adam K. Huttenlockerc,1 aDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1; bMuseum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79415; and cDepartment of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 Edited by Neil H. Shubin, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved May 18, 2017 (received for review April 26, 2017) The origin of the limbless caecilians remains a lasting question in other early tetrapods; “-ophis” (Greek) meaning serpent. The vertebrate evolution. Molecular phylogenies and morphology species name honors paleontologist Farish Jenkins, whose work on support that caecilians are the sister taxon of batrachians (frogs the Jurassic Eocaecilia inspired the present study. and salamanders), from which they diverged no later than the early Permian. Although recent efforts have discovered new, early Holotype. Denver Museum of Nature & Science (DMNH) 56658, members of the batrachian lineage, the record of pre-Cretaceous partial skull with lower jaw and disarticulated postcrania (Fig. 1 caecilians is limited to a single species, Eocaecilia micropodia. The A–D). Discovered by B.J.S. in 1999 in the Upper Triassic Chinle position of Eocaecilia within tetrapod phylogeny is controversial, Formation (“red siltstone” member), Main Elk Creek locality, as it already acquired the specialized morphology that character- Garfield County, Colorado (DMNH loc. 1306). The tetrapod as- izes modern caecilians by the Jurassic. Here, we report on a small semblage is regarded as middle–late Norian in age (Revueltian land amphibian from the Upper Triassic of Colorado, United States, with vertebrate faunachron) (13). -
Controlled Animals
Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3. -
Morphological Evolution and Modularity of the Caecilian Skull Carla Bardua1,2* , Mark Wilkinson1, David J
Bardua et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1342-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull Carla Bardua1,2* , Mark Wilkinson1, David J. Gower1, Emma Sherratt3 and Anjali Goswami1,2 Abstract Background: Caecilians (Gymnophiona) are the least speciose extant lissamphibian order, yet living forms capture approximately 250 million years of evolution since their earliest divergences. This long history is reflected in the broad range of skull morphologies exhibited by this largely fossorial, but developmentally diverse, clade. However, this diversity of form makes quantification of caecilian cranial morphology challenging, with highly variable presence or absence of many structures. Consequently, few studies have examined morphological evolution across caecilians. This extensive variation also raises the question of degree of conservation of cranial modules (semi-autonomous subsets of highly-integrated traits) within this clade, allowing us to assess the importance of modular organisation in shaping morphological evolution. We used an intensive surface geometric morphometric approach to quantify cranial morphological variation across all 32 extant caecilian genera. We defined 16 cranial regions using 53 landmarks and 687 curve and 729 surface sliding semilandmarks. With these unprecedented high-dimensional data, we analysed cranial shape and modularity across caecilians assessing phylogenetic, allometric and ecological influences on cranial evolution, as well as investigating the relationships among integration, evolutionary rate, and morphological disparity. Results: We found highest support for a ten-module model, with greater integration of the posterior skull. Phylogenetic signal was significant (Kmult =0.87,p < 0.01), but stronger in anterior modules, while allometric influences were also significant (R2 =0.16,p < 0.01), but stronger posteriorly. -
CCAC Guidelines: Amphibians Date of Publication: August 2021
CCAC Canadian Council on Animal Care CCPA Conseil canadien de protection des animaux CCAC guidelines: Amphibians Date of Publication: August 2021 © Canadian Council on Animal Care, 2021 ISBN: 978-0-919087-91-0 190 O’Connor St., Suite 800 Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 2R3 http://www.ccac.ca ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) Board of Directors is grateful for the expertise contributed by the members of the CCAC Subcommittee on Amphibians and for their engagement throughout the guidelines development process. In addition, the Board is grateful to all those who provided critical input during the two review periods. We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of both the CCAC Standards Committee and the CCAC Assessment and Certification Committee members, who provided important guidance to the subcommittee. Finally, we would like to thank the CCAC Secretariat project team for its excellent work throughout this process. The CCAC also acknowledges its funders, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The CCAC could not continue to deliver on its current mandate without their support. Dr. Chris Kennedy Mr. Pierre Verreault Chair, CCAC Board of Directors CCAC Executive Director CCAC AMPHIBIANS SUBCOMMITTEE Dr. Frédéric Chatigny (Chair) Mr. Jason Allen, Trent University Dr. Anne-Marie Catudal, Université Laval Dr. Winnie Chan, Mass General Brigham Mr. Dan Fryer, Greater Moncton SPCA Dr. Valérie Langlois, Institut national de la recherche scientifique Dr. Hillary Maddin, Carleton University Dr. Stéphane Roy, Université de Montréal Ms. Alison Weller, Canadian Food Inspection Agency Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE.........................................................................................................................1 SUMMARY OF THE GUIDELINES LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT .................................2 1. -
50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) § 16.14
§ 15.41 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) Species Common name Serinus canaria ............................................................. Common Canary. 1 Note: Permits are still required for this species under part 17 of this chapter. (b) Non-captive-bred species. The list 16.14 Importation of live or dead amphib- in this paragraph includes species of ians or their eggs. non-captive-bred exotic birds and coun- 16.15 Importation of live reptiles or their tries for which importation into the eggs. United States is not prohibited by sec- Subpart C—Permits tion 15.11. The species are grouped tax- onomically by order, and may only be 16.22 Injurious wildlife permits. imported from the approved country, except as provided under a permit Subpart D—Additional Exemptions issued pursuant to subpart C of this 16.32 Importation by Federal agencies. part. 16.33 Importation of natural-history speci- [59 FR 62262, Dec. 2, 1994, as amended at 61 mens. FR 2093, Jan. 24, 1996; 82 FR 16540, Apr. 5, AUTHORITY: 18 U.S.C. 42. 2017] SOURCE: 39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, unless oth- erwise noted. Subpart E—Qualifying Facilities Breeding Exotic Birds in Captivity Subpart A—Introduction § 15.41 Criteria for including facilities as qualifying for imports. [Re- § 16.1 Purpose of regulations. served] The regulations contained in this part implement the Lacey Act (18 § 15.42 List of foreign qualifying breed- U.S.C. 42). ing facilities. [Reserved] § 16.2 Scope of regulations. Subpart F—List of Prohibited Spe- The provisions of this part are in ad- cies Not Listed in the Appen- dition to, and are not in lieu of, other dices to the Convention regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe addi- § 15.51 Criteria for including species tional restrictions or conditions for the and countries in the prohibited list. -
Food Composition of Alpine Newt (Ichthyosaura Alpestris) in the Post-Hibernation Terrestrial Life Stage
NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 12 (2): 299-303 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2016 Article No.: e161503 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Food composition of alpine newt (Ichthyosaura alpestris) in the post-hibernation terrestrial life stage Oldřich KOPECKÝ1,*, Karel NOVÁK1, Jiří VOJAR2 and František ŠUSTA3 1. Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6 - Suchdol 165 21, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6 - Suchdol 165 21, Czech Republic. 3. Prague Zoological Garden, U Trojského zámku 3/120, Praha 7 - Troja 171 00, Czech Republic. *Corresponding author, O. Kopecký, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 26. Juy 2015 / Accepted: 29. December 2015 / Available online: 09. January 2016 / Printed: December 2016 Abstract. Amphibians in the temperate climatic zone, including European newt species, annually migrate to water for reproduction. While prey consumption and the composition of their diet during the breeding season have been explored relatively well, the opposite is true for the spring period before reproduction. Therefore, the primary of aim our study was to determine whether newts consumed food in the post- hibernation terrestrial life stage. We studied one population of alpine newts from the Czech Republic. The majority of the newts examined (65.30%) contained some food item. Repletion level was not connected with the newts’ body condition and also did not differ between males and females. In addition, the number of items consumed and the diversity of prey were not connected with an individual’s body condition or sex. -
Latitudinal MHC Variation and Haplotype Associated Differential Survival in Response To
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/597559; this version posted April 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Latitudinal MHC variation and haplotype associated differential survival in response to 2 experimental infection of two strains of Batrachochytrium dendrobatitis (Bd-GPL) in common 3 toads 4 5 Maria Cortazar-Chinarro1, Sara Meurling1, 2, Laurens Schroyens, Mattias Siljestam, Alex Ritcher- 6 Boix, Anssi Laurila, and Jacob Höglund 7 8 Dept of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-75236, Uppsala, Sweden 9 [email protected] 10 1) Authors contributed equally to this work 11 2) To whom correspondence should be addressed 12 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/597559; this version posted April 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 13 Abstract 14 While both innate and adaptive immune system mechanisms have been implicated in resistance 15 against the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatitis, studies on the role of specific MHC 16 haplotypes on Bd infection are rare. Here, we studied latitudinal variation in MHC Class IIB loci 17 along a latitudinal gradient from southern to northern Sweden in common toads, Bufo bufo. 18 Swedish toad populations had fewer MHC Class IIB haplotypes compared to a previous study of 19 populations in Britain. Furthermore, we found MHC diversity to decline from south to the north 20 within Sweden. -
The Dynamics of Changes in the Amphibian (Amphibia) Population
Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Vol. 31 No 4(86): 8-16 Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych DOI 10.2478/oszn-2020-0013 Wojciech Gotkiewicz*, Krzysztof Wittbrodt**, Ewa Dragańska* The Dynamics of Changes in the Amphibian (Amphibia) Population Size in the Masurian Landscape Park Monitoring Results of Spring Migration Monitoring from the Years 2011–2019 * Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn; ** Masurian Landscape Park in Krutyń; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Biodiversity, amphibians, threats, Masurian Landscape Park Abstract The study presents the results of nine-year-long monitoring of the population size of amphibians (Amphibia) as one of the indicator communities used to assess the biological diversity level. The study was conducted in the Masurian Landscape Park located in Warmińsko-MazurskieVoivodeship. The obtained results demonstrated that 13 out of the 18 domestic amphibian species occurred in the area selected for research activities, including the species entered in the IUCN Red List. No clear correlation was found between the dynamics of population changes and the environmental, primarily climatic, determinants. © IOŚ-PIB 1. INTRODUCTION 2. FACTORS REPRESENTING A THREAT TO In Poland, 18 amphibian species live in Poland. They AMPHIBIANS represent two orders, namely, salamanders – Caudata and frogs – Anura, and six families: true frogs (Ranidae), As regards amphibians, the greatest threat is the loss of true toads (Bufonidae), true salamanders and newts habitats, which affects a total of 76 species. Contaminants (Salamandridae), European spadefoot toads (Pelobatidae), are the second major threat that affects 62 species. They Firebelly toads (Bombinatoridae) and Tree frogs (Hylidae). -
Salamander Species Listed As Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016
Salamander Species Listed as Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016 Effective January 28, 2016, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The listing includes all species in these 20 genera: Chioglossa, Cynops, Euproctus, Hydromantes, Hynobius, Ichthyosaura, Lissotriton, Neurergus, Notophthalmus, Onychodactylus, Paramesotriton, Plethodon, Pleurodeles, Salamandra, Salamandrella, Salamandrina, Siren, Taricha, Triturus, and Tylototriton The species are: (1) Chioglossa lusitanica (golden striped salamander). (2) Cynops chenggongensis (Chenggong fire-bellied newt). (3) Cynops cyanurus (blue-tailed fire-bellied newt). (4) Cynops ensicauda (sword-tailed newt). (5) Cynops fudingensis (Fuding fire-bellied newt). (6) Cynops glaucus (bluish grey newt, Huilan Rongyuan). (7) Cynops orientalis (Oriental fire belly newt, Oriental fire-bellied newt). (8) Cynops orphicus (no common name). (9) Cynops pyrrhogaster (Japanese newt, Japanese fire-bellied newt). (10) Cynops wolterstorffi (Kunming Lake newt). (11) Euproctus montanus (Corsican brook salamander). (12) Euproctus platycephalus (Sardinian brook salamander). (13) Hydromantes ambrosii (Ambrosi salamander). (14) Hydromantes brunus (limestone salamander). (15) Hydromantes flavus (Mount Albo cave salamander). -
Title 50—Wildlife and Fisheries
Title 50—Wildlife and Fisheries (This book contains parts 1 to 16) Part CHAPTER I—United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Depart- ment of the Interior ........................................................... 1 1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:08 Nov 27, 2018 Jkt 244234 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Y:\SGML\244234.XXX 244234 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:08 Nov 27, 2018 Jkt 244234 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Y:\SGML\244234.XXX 244234 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PROVISIONS Part Page 1 Definitions .............................................................. 5 2 Agency organization and locations ......................... 5 3 Nondiscrimination—contracts, permits, and use of facilities ............................................................... 7 SUBCHAPTER B—TAKING, POSSESSION, TRANSPORTATION, SALE, PUR- CHASE, BARTER, EXPORTATION, AND IMPORTATION OF WILDLIFE AND PLANTS 10 General provisions.................................................. 8 11 Civil procedures...................................................... 30 12 Seizure and forfeiture procedures ........................... 34 13 General permit procedures ...................................... 44 14 Importation, exportation, and transportation of wildlife ................................................................. 57 15 Wild Bird Conservation Act .................................... 86 16 Injurious wildlife..................................................... 98 3 VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:08 Nov 27, 2018 Jkt 244234 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Y:\SGML\244234.XXX 244234 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:08 Nov 27, 2018 Jkt 244234 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 8008 Sfmt 8008 Y:\SGML\244234.XXX 244234 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PROVISIONS PART 1—DEFINITIONS § 1.6 Person. Person means an individual, club, as- Sec. sociation, partnership, corporation, or 1.1 Meaning of terms. -
Food Composition of an Ichthyosaura Alpestris (Amphibia) Population from the Poiana Rusca Mountains, Romania
HERPETOLOGICA ROMANICA Vol. 5, 2011, pp.7-25 ISSN: 1842-9203 Article No. 111102 Food composition of an Ichthyosaura alpestris (Amphibia) population from the Poiana Rusca Mountains, Romania Horia Vlad BOGDAN*, Raluca Maria IANC, Adina Nicoleta POP, Renata Ştefania SÖLLÖSI, Alexandra Maria POPOVICI and Iulia-Florina POP University of Oradea, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology; Universităţii str. 1, Oradea 410087, Romania * Corresponding author, H.V. Bogdan, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The food composition of the Ichthyosaura alpestris populations from Nadrag, Poiana Rusca Mountains confirms that this species generally has a less intense feeding in the aquatic period. Although the differences between the two study periods and between the two sexes weren’t significant, the feeding was clearly more reduced in the second study period, as well as in the case of the males. A large number of newts presented stomach contents with no animal preys (only shad skin, spawn, vegetal remains), especially in the second period. The poorer feeding from the end of April is a consequence of the fact that during this period the newts were already getting ready to leave the aquatic environment, the number of individuals in water being lower than in the end of March. This result seems to be more important than the composition of their diet, which is similar to that of other populations previously studied from Romania. If these differences were confirmed and they are not a result of some special conditions of the year 2011, this would mean that the I. alpestris populations from Poiana Rusca Mountains have their aquatic phase offset by one month ahead of the populations from the Apuseni Mountains, fact that would confirm their distinct status.