DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign Direct Investment Trends and Developments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign Direct Investment Trends and Developments FOREIGN DIRECT 3 INVESTMENT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS A. RECENT TRENDS IN FOREIGN DIRECT 15 INVESTMENT INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS 1. Global trends Following what seemed to be a swift recovery from the global financial crisis in 2010-2011, global foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows have again taken a downward turn. As the world economic recovery continues to be uncertain and fragile, global FDI inflows have declined by 18%, from $1.65 trillion in 2011 to $1.35 trillion in 2012. Inflows decreased both in developed and developing economies.16 However, while the majority of developed countries experienced a significant reduction in their FDI inflows, by 32% on average, those to developing economies remained relatively resilient, declining by only 4% on average. More importantly, for the first time developing economies alone absorbed more FDI than developed countries, accounting for 52% of global FDI inflows (figure 3.1). Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2013 FIGURE 3.1 Foreign direct investment inflows to developed and developing economies, 2003-2012 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 Billions of United States dollars 200 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Developed economies Developing economies Source: ESCAP calculations, based on UNCTADStat. FIGURE 3.2 Foreign direct investment outflows from developed and developing economies, 2003-2012 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 Billions of United States dollars 200 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Developed economies Developing economies Source: ESCAP calculations, based on UNCTADStat Note: Due to their small share, transition countries are not shown in the figures. Mirroring global FDI inflows, global outflows In 2012, for the first time, developing declined by 17% in 2012. The continued economic uncertainty, especially in developed countries, economies absorbed more FDI than has led companies from these locations to scale developed countries, accounting for back their operations. As a result, most of the 52% of global FDI inflows. global decline can be attributed to developed economies, which saw a 23% decline in FDI outflows. Since peaking in 2007 at $2.3 trillion, global FDI outflows have decreased by almost 40%, while outflows from developed economies 28 in 2012 amounted to less than half of what they short of the record set in 2011 ($550 billion), they were in 2007. In contrast, apart from a small exceeded the annual average for the decade. dip in 2009, developing economies have been slowly but steadily increasing their outward In terms of FDI inflows, the developing Asia- investments since 2007. Developing countries Pacific region has significantly outpaced other have made advances in catching up with the developing regions in the world. This reflects developed countries as a source of FDI. In 2012, the solid position of Asia and the Pacific as a developing countries provided 31% of global FDI leading investment destination for transnational outflows, whereas developed countries supplied companies looking for investment opportunities. 65% of global outflows and transition countries The developing countries in the Asia-Pacific accounted for the remaining 4%. Compared to region account for 33% of global inflows 2007 the difference is striking. In 2007, only 15% compared to the 18% share of countries in Latin of outflows originated in developing countries America and the Caribbean, and the 4% share of compared to 83% in developed countries and 2% countries in Africa (figure 3.3). in transition countries (figure 3.2). 2. Regional trends Much of the relative success of developing The developing countries in the countries can be attributed to the Asia-Pacific Asia-Pacific region account for 33% region,17 which has shown notable resilience in of global FDI inflows, reflecting the the challenging economic climate. Asia-Pacific region’s solid position as a leading countries attracted $510 billion of FDI inflows in investment destination. 2012. Although FDI volumes received in 2012 fell CHAPTER 3 FIGURE 3.3 Foreign direct investment inflows to major world developing regions and their share of global foreign direct investment inflows, 2010-2012 (billions of United States dollars and percentage) 600 29% 500 33% 30% 400 300 15% 18% 13% 200 100 4% Billions of United States dollars 3% 3% 0 Africa Latin America and the Caribbean 2010 2011 2012 Source: ESCAP calculations, based on UNCTADStat. 29 Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2013 FDI outflows from the region in 2012 totaled $481 stated that this law has brought about regulatory billion compared to $484 billion in 2011. The uncertainty that weakens Mongolia’s position in share of the Asia-Pacific region in total world attracting FDI.18 FDI outflows increased from 29% in 2011 to 35% in 2012. Not only are the Asia-Pacific countries The South-East Asian subregion is exhibiting proving to be attractive investment destinations a robust growth trend, which is supported by in the current economic climate, they are also labour-intensive FDI and value chain activities becoming increasingly important as sources of in low-income countries, such as Cambodia, investment. the Philippines and Viet Nam. In 2012, inflows amounted to $111 billion, up by 2% compared 3. Subregional trends to the previous year. This makes it the only subregion in Asia and the Pacific region that has Among the developing Asia-Pacific subregions, continued to experience FDI growth despite the East and North-East Asia continues to attract slowdown of the global economy. the largest amount of FDI inflows, although the South-East Asian subregion is progressively In 2012, FDI inflows to South-East Asia catching up (figure 3.4). FDI inflows to the East increased by 2%, making it the only and North-East Asian subregion reached $215 Asia-Pacific subregion that continued to billion in 2012, down 8% from the previous year. experience FDI inflows growth. The decline can be attributed to weaker inflows to China, Hong Kong, China and the Republic of The year 2012 proved to be tough for South and Korea. Mongolia attracted large FDI inflows in South-West Asia, as FDI inflows to the subregion 2010 and 2011, mainly driven by investments in dropped by almost a quarter. This development the mining sector. In 2012, however, it witnessed can be largely attributed to India, given its size in a 6% reduction in FDI inflows. This may be the subregion, although several other countries due to the new Strategic Foreign Investment in the subregion also suffered declines in FDI Law passed in March 2012, stating that the inflows. For example, Sri Lanka and Turkey both parliament must approve foreign takeovers in saw their FDI inflows fall by a little more than strategic sectors, such as mining. Investors have 20%, whereas those of Pakistan fell by 36%. FIGURE 3.4 Foreign direct investment inflows to Asia-Pacific developing subregions and developed economies, 2010-2012 250 200 150 100 50 Billions of United States dollars 0 East and North-East South-East Asia South and South-West North and Central Asia Developed economies Asia Asia 2010 2011 2012 Source: ESCAP calculations, based on UNCTADStat. Note: Due to the small share of inflows to the Pacific subregion, that subregion is not represented in this figure. 30 North and Central Asia attracts the third largest the group increased by almost 10%. FDI inflows amount of FDI inflows after East and North- to landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) in East Asia, and South-East Asia. Inflows to the the region remained at a high level of $26 billion, subregion fell by 5% in 2012, to a value of $74 although they fell, somewhat, from the previous billion. Accounting for a 70% share of inflows, year. the Russian Federation has a major impact on subregional developments. Another important Similar to other developed countries in the world, FDI inflows to the Asia-Pacific developed destination for FDI is Kazakhstan, inflows to countries fell by 9% to $62 billion in 2012. Of which grew by 1% in 2012. Kazakhstan has the three developed countries in the region, traditionally attracted large investments in the only Japan attracted higher FDI inflows than the natural resources sector, although in 2012 the previous year. After two years of foreign investors largest announced greenfield projects were in scaling down their investments, FDI into Japan the tourism, communications and transportation reached $1.7 billion. Australia continues to industries. dominate as the largest destination for inflows The developing Pacific subregion attracts less among developed countries, drawing in $57 than 1% of FDI inflows to developing countries billion in 2012. Australia’s resource sector has in the Asia-Pacific region. In 2012, inflows to proven to be highly attractive; however, falling commodity prices mean that investments into the subregion increased by 6% and amounted areas such as mining could have already reached to slightly over $2 billion. Growth in inflows can their peak (Capital Economics, 2013a). be mainly attributed to Papua New Guinea and Samoa, although the Marshall Islands and the The subregional division of FDI outflows from Northern Mariana Islands experienced larger developing Asia-Pacific countries is not uniform FDI inflows as well. (figure 3.5). The East and North-East Asian FDI inflows to Asia-Pacific least developed subregion accounts for the lion’s share of total countries (LDCs) reached a new peak of almost outflows from developing countries in the region. $5.5 billion in 2012. Driven by increasing inflows Recently, its share has edged up further from 59% in 2011 to 63% in 2012, with total outflows to the largest FDI recipient countries among the CHAPTER 3 LDCs, namely Cambodia and Myanmar, inflows to from the subregion at $214 billion. A similar FIGURE 3.5 Foreign direct investment outflows from Asia-Pacific developing subregions and developed economies, 2010-2012 250 200 150 100 50 Billions of United States dollars 0 East & North-East Asia South-East Asia South & South-West Asia North & Central Asia Developed economies 2010 2011 2012 Source: ESCAP calculations, based on UNCTADStat.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pancontinental Oil & Gas NL – June 2012 Institutional Roadshow
    Highly leveraged into two of the most exciting oil and gas regions of the decade Investor Presentation - June 2012 www.pancon.com.au Disclaimer These materials are strictly confidential and are being supplied to you solely for your information and should not be reproduced in any form, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, in whole or part, by any medium or for any purpose. Failure to comply this restriction may constitute a violation of applicable securities laws. These materials do not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to sell or issue, or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, or any offer to underwrite or otherwise acquire any securities, nor shall any part of these materials or fact of their distribution or communication form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract, commitment or investment decision whatsoever in relation thereto. The information included in the presentation and these materials is subject to updating, completion, revision and amendment, and such information may change materially. No person is under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained in the presentation and these materials, and any opinions expressed in relation thereto are subject to change without notice. The distribution of these materials in other jurisdictions may also be restricted by law, and persons into whose possession these materials come should be aware of and observe any such restrictions. This presentation includes forward-looking statements that reflect the company’s intentions, beliefs or current expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1BN) Africa Gas Rush Imperils $100 Billion in Australian LNG: En Ergy
    1BN) Africa Gas Rush Imperils $100 Billion in Australian LNG: En ergy +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Africa Gas Rush Imperils $100 Billion in Australian LNG: Energy 2012-08-30 02:29:08.17 GMT By Eduard Gismatullin and James Paton Aug. 30 (Bloomberg) -- The discovery along Africa’s east coast of the world’s biggest gas finds in a decade threatens to undo investment plans on the other side of the Indian Ocean. Royal Dutch Shell Plc, BG Group Plc of the U.K. and France’s Total SA may scale back projects to build liquefied natural gas export plants in Australia and switch to Tanzania and Mozambique, where the new prospects lie and will cost about half as much, according to Jefferies International Ltd. The LNG boom in Australia, where $180 billion of planned investment was set to make gas the country’s fastest-growing export over the next five years, risks losing strength as labor and material shortages force up building costs. As energy companies consider the next $100 billion of projects, a switch to East Africa would hold back Australia’s market share in China and India, where energy consumption is forecast rise more than 60 percent by 2030. “Because of the volume that’s been discovered in East Africa, the economics look to be able to challenge Australian LNG projects, given the cost inflation they have experienced,” said Peter Hutton, an RBC Capital Markets analyst in London. “All companies will have that on their radar.” The Asian market for LNG, gas that’s chilled to a liquid for shipment by tanker, accounts for about two-thirds of global demand and will grow by 6 percent a year this decade, according to Sanford C.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska North Slope
    DIVERSIFIED EXPLORER NORTH SLOPE OF ALASKA SEPTEMBER 2019 UPDATE Nordic Rig #3 NORDIC CALISTA SERVICES Disclaimer The information contained in these slides has been prepared by 88 Energy Limited (the “Company”). The information contained in these slides, the presentation made to you verbally and any other information provided to you (in writing or otherwise) in connection with the Company and its business (the “Presentation Materials”) is subject to updating, completion, revision, verification and amendment without notice which may result in material changes. The Company, in its sole discretion, reserves the right to amend or supplement these Presentation Materials at any time. The Presentation Materials have not been approved by the London Stock Exchange plc or by any authority which could be a competent authority for the purposes of the Prospectus Directive (Directive 2003/71/EC). The Presentation Materials are for information purposes only and do not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities nor shall they nor any part of them form the basis of or be relied on in connection with, or act as any inducement to enter into, any contract, transaction or commitment whatsoever. The Presentation Materials contain only a synopsis of more detailed information published in relation to the matters described therein and accordingly no reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the sufficiency of such information or on the completeness, accuracy or fairness of such information and to do so could potentially expose you to a significant risk of losing all of the property invested by you or the incurring by you of additional liability.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency in Kenya's Upstream Oil and Gas Sector
    Beating the Resource Curse: Transparency in Kenya’s Upstream Oil and Gas Sector by Sally Lesley Brunton Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Political Science in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor Ian Taylor March 2018 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2018 Copyright © 2018 Stellenbosch University. All rights reserved. i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract In 2012 Tullow Oil plc discovered commercial quantities of crude oil onshore Kenya. Additional commercial discoveries have subsequently been made and estimates suggest that Kenya’s oil reserves are substantial. Steps towards the development and production of these reserves are progressing and Kenya is thus preparing to become another of sub-Saharan Africa’s oil-exporting states. Nevertheless, experience has shown that the majority of these resource-rich states have succumbed to symptoms of the ‘resource curse’: economic and human development and growth has been hindered rather than helped and many of these states find themselves struggling to escape from the clutches of rent-seeking, bribery and corruption. In an attempt to determine how best Kenya might avoid the negative impacts of the curse this study examines various strands of resource curse theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancontinental Oil & Gas NL – March 2012 Investor Presentation
    Highly leveraged into two of the most exciting oil and gas regions of the decade Investor Presentation March 2012 www.pancon.com.au Disclaimer These materials are strictly confidential and are being supplied to you solely for your information and should not be reproduced in any form, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published, in whole or part, by any medium or for any purpose. Failure to comply this restriction may constitute a violation of applicable securities laws. These materials do not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation to sell or issue, or any solicitation of any offer to purchase or subscribe for, or any offer to underwrite or otherwise acquire any securities, nor shall any part of these materials or fact of their distribution or communication form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract, commitment or investment decision whatsoever in relation thereto. The information included in the presentation and these materials is subject to updating, completion, revision and amendment, and such information may change materially. No person is under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained in the presentation and these materials, and any opinions expressed in relation thereto are subject to change without notice. The distribution of these materials in other jurisdictions may also be restricted by law, and persons into whose possession these materials come should be aware of and observe any such restrictions. This presentation includes forward-looking statements that reflect the company‟s intentions, beliefs or current expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the Basic Facts Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding The
    Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the Basic Facts Liquefied Natural Gas: Understanding the “I strongly support developing new LNG capacity in the United States.” —President George W. Bush Page 2 4 Growing Demand Emergence of the for Natural Gas Global LNG Market About This Report Natural gas plays a vital role in One of several proposed the U.S. energy supply and in supply options would involve This report was prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in achieving the nation’s economic increasing imports of liquefied collaboration with the National and environmental goals. natural gas (LNG) to ensure Association of Regulatory Utility that American consumers have Although natural gas production Commissioners (NARUC). DOE’s Office of adequate supplies of natural in North America is projected Fossil Energy supports technology gas in the future. research and policy options to ensure to gradually increase through clean, reliable, and affordable supplies 2025, consumption has begun Liquefaction enables natural of oil and natural gas for American to outpace available domestic gas that would otherwise be consumers, working closely with the National Energy Technology Laboratory, natural gas supply. Over time, “stranded” to reach major which is the Department’s lead center this gap will widen. markets. Developing countries for the research and development of with plentiful natural gas advanced fossil energy technologies. resources are particularly NARUC, a nonprofit organization interested in monetizing composed of governmental agencies engaged in the regulation of natural gas by exporting it as telecommunications, energy, and water LNG. Conversely, more utilities and carriers in the 50 states, the developed nations with little District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and or no domestic natural gas the Virgin Islands, serves the public rely on imports.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Energy Limited Abn 80 072 964 179
    88 ENERGY LIMITED ABN 80 072 964 179 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2019 CONTENTS CORPORATE INFORMATION 2 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 3 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 5 AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 27 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHNSIVE INCOME 28 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 29 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 30 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 31 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 32 DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION 62 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 63 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 67 ADDITIONAL ASX INFORMATION 68 88 Energy Limited – Annual Report 2019 1 | Page CORPORATE INFORMATION DIRECTORS AUDITOR Mr Michael Evans (Non-Executive Chairman) BDO Audit (WA) Pty Ltd Mr David Wall (Managing Director) 38 Station St Dr Stephen Staley (Non-Executive Director) Subiaco WA 6008 JOINT COMPANY SECRETARIES BANKERS Ms Sarah Smith Westpac Banking Corporation Mr Ashley Gilbert Level 13, 109 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 REGISTERED OFFICE & PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS SHARE REGISTRY Level 2, 5 Ord Street Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd WEST PERTH WA 6005 Level 11, 172 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: +61 (8) 9485 0990 Telephone: +61 (8) 9323 2000 Facsimile: +61 (8) 9321 8990 Facsimile: +61 (8) 9323 2033 Website: www.88energy.com Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions POSTAL ADDRESS Bridgewater Road PO Box 1674 Bristol BS99 6ZZ West Perth WA 6872 United Kingdom ASX CODES COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION AND DOMICILE Shares 88E Australia LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE - AIM Shares 88E 88 Energy Limited – Annual Report 2019 2 | Page CHAIRMAN’S LETTER Dear Shareholders It is with great optimism that I present my Chairman’s Report for the 2019 financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilag 3. Negativlister I Relation Til Producenter Af Fossile Brændstoffer M.V. Københavns Kommunes Finansielle Strategi Og Risikopolitik
    Bilag 3. Negativlister i relation til producenter af fossile brændstoffer m.v. Københavns Kommunes finansielle strategi og risikopolitik D. 8. juni 2016 Læsevejledning til negativlisten: Moderselskab / øverste ejer vises med fed skrift til venstre. Med almindelig tekst, indrykket, er de underliggende selskaber, der udsteder aktier og erhvervsobligationer. Det er de underliggende, udstedende selskaber, der er omfattet af negativlisten Moderselskab / øverste ejer – udstedende selskab Acergy SA SUBSEA 7 Inc Subsea 7 SA Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Indonesia PT Alam Tri Abadi PT Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Afren PLC Afren PLC Africa Oil Corp Africa Oil Corp AGL Energy Ltd AGL Electricity VIC Pty Ltd AGL Energy Ltd AGL Sales Pty Ltd Victorian Energy Pty Ltd Aker Solutions ASA Akastor ASA Aker Solutions Holding ASA Aker Solutions ASA Alliant Energy Corp Alliant Energy Corp Alliant Energy Resources LLC Interstate Power & Light Co Wisconsin Power & Light Co Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alex Energy Inc Alliance Coal Corp Alpha Appalachia Holdings Inc Alpha Appalachia Services Inc Alpha Natural Resource Inc/Old Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alpha Natural Resources LLC Alpha Natural Resources LLC / Alpha Natural Resources Capital Corp Alpha NR Holding Inc Aracoma Coal Co Inc AT Massey Coal Co Inc Bandmill Coal Corp Bandytown Coal Co Belfry Coal Corp Belle Coal Co Inc Ben Creek Coal Co Big Bear Mining Co Big Laurel Mining Corp Black King Mine
    [Show full text]
  • Fastnet Oil & Gas Plc Corporate Presentation
    Fastnet Oil & Gas Plc Corporate Presentation September 2014 Disclaimer This document is confidential and is being supplied to you solely for your information and may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to any other person or published in whole or in part, for any purpose. In particular, neither this document nor any copy of it (or any part of it) may be sent to or taken into the United States, Canada, Australia, Republic of South Africa or Japan (or any of their respective territories or possessions, or to any resident thereof or any other corporation, partnership or other such entity created or organised under the law thereof), nor may it be distributed to or for the account or on behalf of any US person (within the meaning of regulation S under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended). The distribution of this presentation in other jurisdictions may also be restricted by law and persons into whose possession this presentation comes (or a copy hereof) should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restriction. Any failure to comply with these restrictions may constitute a violation of the laws of any such other jurisdiction. This document does not constitute or form any part of any offer or invitation or other solicitation or recommendation to purchase any securities and contains information designed only to provide a broad overview for discussion purposes. As such, all information and research material provided herein is subject to change and this document does not purport to provide a complete description of the investment opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31St
    TIGER ROYALTIES and INVESTMENTS PLC (FORMERLY TIGER RESOURCE PLC) ANNUAL REPORT and FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2020 BUSINESS OVERVIEW FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Contents BUSINESS OVERVIEW Officers and Professional Advisers 2 Chairman’s Statement 3 Portfolio Review 4 Strategic Report 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of the Directors 11 Corporate Governance Statement 15 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 17 Independent Auditors’ Report 18 Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Comprehensive Income 22 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 23 Parent Company Statements of Changes in Equity 24 Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Financial Position 25 Consolidated and Parent Company Cash Flow Statements 26 Notes to the Financial Statements 27 1 Officers And Professional Advisers DIRECTORS AUDITORS C Bird (Chairman) Shipleys LLP M H Nolan 10 Orange Street R Samtani Haymarket A Borrelli London WC2H 7DQ SECRETARY R Samtani BANKERS Allied Irish Bank Plc 10 Berkeley Square London REGISTERED OFFICE W1J 6AA 7-8 Kendrick Mews London SW7 3HG SOLICITORS Fladgate LLP 16 Great Queen Street NOMINATED ADVISER London Beaumont Cornish Limited WC2B 5DG Building 3 566 Chiswick High Road London W4 5YA REGISTRARS Computershare Investor Services (Ireland) Limited 3100 Lake Drive Citywest Business Campus BROKER Dublin 24 Novum Securities Ltd D24 AK82 8-10 Grosvenor Gardens Ireland London SW1W 0DH REGISTERED NUMBER WEBSITE 02882601 www.tiger-rf.com 2 TIGER ROYALTIES and INVESTMENTS plc Annual Report 2020 Chairman’s Statement Dear Shareholder, BUSINESS OVERVIEW The year under review has seen Moving to issues specific to our own demand will be in metals and minerals Tiger’s net asset value per share industry, most commodities have which are used in the storage of energy (“NAV”) decrease by 26% to 0.23p experienced significant price increases and as such we also feel very positive from 0.31p as at 31 December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Reflections
    27 January 2012 Seismic reflections Gas to liquids could gain traction The economics of gas-to-liquids (GTL) plants is looking increasingly interesting, driven by the widening gap between oil and natural gas prices, particularly in North America. Currently, on a heat-equivalent basis, WTI is selling for 7x Henry Hub against 2x as recently as 2008. GTL facilities are, of course, costly and the process is energy intensive but at anything like current US oil and gas prices, GTL projects are arguably viable. Interestingly, Chesapeake, the second-largest US gas producer, believes GTL could become a reality in the US later this decade. Analysts Ian McLelland +44 (0)20 3077 5756 Technology Peter J Dupont +44 (0)20 3077 5741 Elaine Reynolds +44 (0)20 3077 5700 GTL is the process where natural gas is converted to liquid fuels and chemical Colin McEnery +44 (0)20 3077 5731 feedstock. Processing comprises four stages: removing water and impurities from Krisztina Kovacs +44 (0)20 3077 5700 the gas, reforming methane to produce synthetic gas, Fischer-Tropsch catalytic [email protected] conversion to produce synthetic crude, and hydrocracking to produce refined 130 120 product. The process typically requires about 10mcf of natural gas per barrel of 110 liquid output. Approximately 6mcf is required as feedstock and the balance to 100 operate the plant. The output mix is typically 70% diesel, 25% naptha and 5% other 90 80 products such as LPG and lubricants. Significantly, by virtue of the process, the 70 liquids contain ultra low contaminants, including sulphur. Jul/11 Apr/11 Jan/11 Oct/11 Jan/12 Jun/11 Feb/11 Mar/11 Aug/11 Sep/11 Nov/11 Dec/11 May/11 Brent WTI Economics The key areas of cost relating to a GTL plant are capital, natural gas feedstock, 490 470 natural gas as a heat and energy source and non-energy related cash operating 450 430 cost including maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Themes and 17 Companies to Generate Alpha in an Industry in Transformation
    May 30, 2011 Europe: Energy: Oil & Gas - E&P Equity Research 5 themes and 17 companies to generate alpha in an industry in transformation E&P - seek exposure to five key themes Unconventional liquids We highlight five themes that we believe will Technological progress being made in established ACTION drive share price performance in the E&P sector; unconventional liquid/oil shale plays in the US RATINGS & UPSIDE TO 12-MONTH PRICE TARGETS high-impact, frontier exploration; unconventional could be levered to new basins and countries; we Upside to TP Market Cap (USDmn) Conviction Buy Rockhopper 241% 901 gas; unconventional liquids; explorers with a highlight two stocks that should benefit from this Aurelian 181% 411 Panoro 154% 261 strong core value; and NOC-driven M&A. We trend, including Conviction Buy Panoro. Bowleven 107% 1074 Buy highlight 17 companies that we believe provide Global Energy Development 189% 37 BPC 168% 316 the most attractive exposure to these themes. Balanced exploration Northern Petroleum 164% 173 Max Petroleum 159% 164 We identify five stocks with high-impact Falkland Oil & Gas 140% 192 PA Resources 132% 418 Nighthawk Energy 125% 36 Frontier exploration increasingly attractive exploration supported by core values that mitigate Dominion 117% 146 Igas 117% 187 We highlight five E&P stocks with high re-rating downside risk of exploration failure. Bowleven Nautical Petroleum 112% 470 Cove Energy 108% 691 potential from exploration in new basins. We and Rockhopper (Conviction Buys) screen well. Aminex Plc 104% 100 Great Eastern Energy 97% 771 expect the majors and NOCs to show increasing Borders and Southern 96% 392 Noreco 96% 523 appetite for these types of assets after a decade of NOC-driven M&A Green Dragon 95% 1718 Maurel & Prom 89% 2604 poor exploration performance.
    [Show full text]