Market Inquiry Into the Land Based Public Passenger

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Market Inquiry Into the Land Based Public Passenger MARKET INQUIRY INTO THE 5 LAND BASED PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT SECTOR. [●] 10 ________________________________________________________ JOHANNESBURG, DAY 2. 15 Tuesday 05 JUNE 2018 ________________________________________________________ PLACE: (CONSTITUTION HILL THE ATRIUM) 20 TUESDAY, 05 JUNE 2018 Contents Session 1............................................................................................................ 2 Session 2.......................................................................................................... 99 5 Session 1 CHAIRPERSON: Morning everyone. Today is the 5th of June 2018. This is a public passenger transport market inquiry conducted by the Competition Commission. This is the second day of the public enquiry process. I will like to 10 formally welcome everyone to this inquiry. My name is Bukhosibakhe Majenge. I am an Attorney currently based at the Competition Commission in its legal services division as a chief legal counsel and I am the Chairperson of the panel. My co-panellists are Ms Nompucuko Nontombana who is the Divisional Manager for the Market Conduct Division of the Competition Commission. The 15 second co-panellist is Mr Thulani Mandiriza who is a co-panellist in his capacity as the head of the inquiry’s technical team. Itumeleng Lesofe as well as Mr Jabulani Ngobeni who are from the Competition Commission will act as evidence leaders. Before we start we would just like to explain the rules that will be applicable to this inquiry. The first one is that the inquiry is open to all 20 members of the public, except when the Chairperson rules that part of the proceedings will be closed on grounds related to confidentiality or any other reason deemed justifiable by ourselves and all sessions will be recorded and streamed live online, safe for those sessions or part of those sessions which are Page 2 of 194 TUESDAY, 05 JUNE 2018 closed and in order to allow for the proper ventilation of issues the Chairperson, the panel as well as evidence leaders will pose questions to any person making oral submissions to this inquiry or any witness. The Chairperson will not permit any person neither personally nor through a Legal Representative to question 5 witnesses or any other person making oral submission during this public hearings, because these public hearings are not a judicial process. But are an evidence gathering process for purposes of a market inquiry. In the event that a stakeholder has an objection or comment or question in respect of any submission made during the proceedings, that stakeholder must submit an 10 objection, comment or question to the inquiry at an email address that will provide or to the Commission’s address and the inquiry will attend to that objection at an appropriate time. Due to time allocation only one Representative either personally or through a Legal Representative will be permitted to make oral submissions, other than witnesses the parties may wish 15 to call in support of their submissions. Where the parties anticipate that different Representatives will be needed to address different topics, appropriate arrangements should be made with the panel in advance. The panel may conduct joint hearings in terms of any number of persons in terms of which any number of persons may be combined as participants in the same proceedings, 20 if their respective submissions or responses seem to the panel to involve substantially the same facts. For purposes of today’s inquiry proceedings, we will receive a submission from North West Transport Investment. Welcome to the inquiry sir. If you could please state your full names for the record. MR DE BEER: Good morning Chair and members of the panels, members of 25 the public present here. Good morning to everybody. My name is Nick de Page 3 of 194 TUESDAY, 05 JUNE 2018 Beer. I am the Senior Manager responsible for operations at North West Transport Investments which is a state owned company based in Pretoria. CHAIRPERSON: Mr de Beer, you will see a piece of paper in front of you. If you could please take the oath or the affirmation, as you wish. 5 MR DE BEER: I will, I will take the oath Chair. CHAIRPERSON: You can go ahead. MR DE BEER: I Lombertus Nicolaas de Beer swear that the evidence that I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So help me God. 10 CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much Mr de Beer. I understand that you have made a submission, a written submission to the inquiry and your submission covers various issues. Before we our evidence leaders as well as the panel pose questions to you, we will like to invite you to very briefly give an outline of just the key issues or the just of your submission. 15 MR DE BEER: Thank you Chair. This submission was based on a letter that we received from the Competition Commission asking some clarity on specific issues which I have then included in the presentation and we will start off with the allocation of operational subsidies, transformation within the industry, a long term contracting between government and bus operators, the licencing of 20 vehicles and licencing en routes and then price setting mechanisms. Those were basically the issues that were highlighted in the letter that was received from the Competition Commission, and on which this presentation is based. So if we can then go to the allocation of operational subsidies. There was a question in the letter on how effective the subsidised mode of public transport is Page 4 of 194 TUESDAY, 05 JUNE 2018 currently in providing passenger services to the poor and majority of South Africans. Now if you will allow me, I will then just briefly go into there. Subsidised public transport services caters mainly for your daily commuters travelling from their homes to their work places in the morning and then the 5 reverse trip in the afternoon back to their homes. During this time in the morning, it starts round about five o’clock until seven o’clock. It is the peek time like we call it in the transport industry. Now currently only mass transport modes like your busses and trains are currently subsidised. During the off peek there is not really a subsidised service rendered by the mass transport modes, 10 because of the size of the vehicles, the cost of operation and then your lower demand during the off-peek periods. Your subsidised public passenger transport modes currently caters for approximately 32 percent of the total market and as I have indicated, during the peek times that these passengers are mainly making use of subsidised transport services. So in short your 15 subsidised public transport services currently are only benefitting passengers travelling during those peek times, and enables them to earn a living through employment which is mostly far away from their places of residence, and it is also only mainly focussed on your major cities and towns where your demand or the number of passengers that you, that you, that are subsidised through this 20 service is benefitting through this subsidy. Our subsidy is benefiting the majority of the poor, given that subsidised services have limited the accessibility compared to minibus taxis. These routes that are currently subsidised are was determined a long time ago. We have interim contracts that were concluded with the Department of Transport in 1996 and 97, and since then there has not 25 really been a lot of movement. There has not been an expansion of the service, Page 5 of 194 TUESDAY, 05 JUNE 2018 and the services are currently still rendered on the allocation or the routes that were identified in 1997 and we are still operating basically in the same areas. Your minibus taxis which is currently not subsidised are mainly operating on your shorter distances. It is due to the limited hours of your peek operation 5 when the demand is the highest and the shorter distances. The vehicle capacity makes it easy for them to load quickly, travel a short distance, do a second and third trip during that peek time. So ja, currently the minibus taxi operators are not part of the subsidised services for public transport. The impact on subsidies competition between the different modes of public 10 transport. The aim of the subsidies for public transport commuted bus sector is to provide affordable fares to passengers. In other words your subsidy benefit directly the passengers that we are currently conveying, and mostly over the longer distances. The high entry cost into the bus market in terms of vehicle prices and establishment of infrastructure to maintain these vehicles as well as 15 the high operating cost of a bigger vehicle and the longer distance operator due to the size of the vehicle, renders the operation of a bus fleet rather expensive when you compare it to your smaller vehicles, like your taxis. Passengers from poor communities who are the beneficiaries of subsidised services, would not be able to afford the fares that would be needed to operate the service without 20 any subsidisation from government. Government contracts for the operation of public transport services enables the formal commuter bus market to operate at affordable fares and has a further advantage to the passengers as the fares of the minibus taxi operations are kept in cheep by the competition from the bus market. What I mean by that is that your market you know the market dictates 25 that your prices are more or less kept in line. From your operators that are not Page 6 of 194 TUESDAY, 05 JUNE 2018 subsidised and the operators that are subsidised that can lower the fares to the passengers. Allocation of operational subsidies. What measures can be put in place to ensure that subsidies do not prevent or distort competition between the different modes of public transport, in particular minibus taxis and busses.
Recommended publications
  • PUTCO PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2005 PUTCO PROPERTIES LIMITED Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa (Reg No 1988/001085/06)
    PUTCO PROPERTIES LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2005 PUTCO PROPERTIES LIMITED Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa (Reg No 1988/001085/06) EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT For the year ended 30 June 2005 Contents Directorate and Secretary 1 Shareholders’ diary 1 Analysis of shareholding 2 Corporate governance report 3 Chairman’s statement 5 Group value added statement 6 Directors’ statement of responsibility 7 Secretary’s statement 7 Report of independent auditors 8 Directors’ report 9 Income statements 10 Balance sheets 11 Statements of changes in equity 12 Cash flow statements 13 Accounting policies 14 Notes to the annual financial statements 16 Interest in subsidiaries 21 Dividend announcement 21 Notice of annual general meeting 33 Proxy form for annual general meeting 35 CIRCULAR RE PROPOSED NAME CHANGE Circular re proposed name change 22 Form of surrender (Pink) 31 Putco Properties Limited Annual Report 2005 DIRECTORATE AND SECRETARY Directors Dr J H de Loor (Chairman and Independent non-executive) (Appointed 1 July 2003 and resigned 30 September 2004) A B Adrian (Chairman and Independent non-executive) (Appointed 30 September 2004) A Carleo (Chief Executive Officer) E M R L Oldham (Managing Director) B C Carleo (Non-executive) L A Carleo (Non-executive) (Resigned 30 September 2004) F G Pisapia (Non-executive) (Appointed 16 September 2003 and resigned 30 September 2004) A L Carleo-Novello (Non-executive) – alternate to L A Carleo (Resigned 30 September 2004) P Senatore (Non-executive) (Appointed 30 September 2004) P Nucci (Independent non-executive)
    [Show full text]
  • The PUTCO Strikes: a Question of Control Carole Cooper
    3 The PUTCO Strikes: a question of control Carole Cooper "We have been told by the Liaison Committee that the management of PUTCO has offered a 15% increase in wages to come into effect from 1 July 1980. We, the workers, do not know if you negotiated that for us or not. We know you did not consult us. We know, therefore, you do not know what our demands are for wages, or for improved conditions of service at the depots, or how management must show more respect for the dignity of the workers." This dissatisfaction sparked off one of the two strikes held by PUTCO bus drivers at the Putcoton depot in the last six months of 1980. Both strikes crippled transport to the black townships surrounding Johannesburg. The first strike, held in July, concerned the pay issue mentioned above, as well as union recognition, with other demands such as the transfer of a Company official and the reinstatement of workers dismissed during the strike, emerging later. The second strike, in December, broke out over an alleged breach of promise by management to investigate the said official's transfer as agreed upon at the resolution of the July strike. Although specific grievances were articulated during the respective strikes, an analysis of events and interviews with drivers reveal the existence of a complexity of grievances not clearly expressed at the time. The main thread that runs through both strikes, linking the articulated and other grievances is worker dissatisfaction with the structures of control - both management imposed and those arising out of the statutes governing labour re­ lations - to which PUTCO drivers are subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Work in Progress, No. 38
    Work in progress, No. 38 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org/. Page 1 of 50 Alternative title Work In Progress Author/Creator University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg) Publisher University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg) Date 1985-08 Resource type Journals (Periodicals) Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa Coverage (temporal) 1985 Source Digital Imaging South Africa (DISA) Rights By kind permission of Hein Marais, Julian May, and the Southern Africa Report. Format extent 48 page(s) (length/size) Page 2 of 50 WORK IN PROGRESS 38 1985 CRADOCK Resistance in the Eastern Cape EMERGENCY 1960 - 1985 Page 3 of 50 Strikes and Disputes: Natal COMPANY AND AREA UNION WORKERS DATE EVENTS AND OUTCOME Baking industry NBIEU 2 000 22.07- The legal strike of over 2 000 Durban bakery workers followed a negotiation breakdown Durban SFAWU 02.08 between employers and unions in the industrial council.
    [Show full text]
  • Helpline Ioaoo O1 2 322 I
    Selling price • Verkoopprys: R2,50 Other countries • Buitelands: R3,25 DECEMBER Vol. 7 PRETORIA, 10 DESEMBER 2001 No. 243 We all have the power to prevent AIDS AIDS HElPLINE Ioaoo o1 2 322 I DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prevention is the cure 1316232-A 243-1 2 No. 243 PIROVINCIAl GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 10 DECEMBER 2001 CONTENTS Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE 7397 Gauteng Interim Minibus Taxi-Type Services Act (11/1997): Amendment to the application of special measures in the Township of Soshanguve and surrounding areas within the area of jurisdiction of the City of Tswane Metropolitan Municipality ............... ,..................................................................................................................................................... 3 BUITENGEWONE PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 10 DESEMBER 2001 No. 243 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE 7397 OF 2001 DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC TRANSPORT, ROADS AND WORKS GAUTENG INTERIM MINIBUS TAXI-TYPE SERVICES ACT, 1997 (ACT NO. 11 OF 1997) AMENDMENlS TO THE APPUCATION OF SPECIAL MEASURES IN THE TOWNSHIP OF SOSHANGUVE AND SURROUNDING AREAS WITHIN THE AREA OF JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY I, Khabisi Mosunkutu, Member of the Executive Council for Public Transport, Roads and Works in the Province of Gauteng, having already declared the area of Jurisdiction of the City of Tshwane Metropolitan Munlclpallty in terms of Section 49 (1) of the Gauteng Interim minibus Taxi-Type Services Act, No 11 of 1997 (the Act), and having published regulations in terms Section 49 (7) of the Act under General Notice No 7263 of 2001 In the Provlnclal Gazette Extraordinary No 239 dated Os December 2001, I now make amendments to the aforementioned regulations published on 5 December 2001 as contained tn the Schedule hereto.
    [Show full text]
  • SANDTON: a Linguistic Ethnography of Small Stories in a Site of Luxury
    Department of Linguistics School of Literature, Language and Media University of the Witwatersrand SANDTON: A linguistic ethnography of small stories in a site of luxury […] Linda [we were like (…) in (…) we were partying in Taboo right (1.0) and the::n (0.7) the person who was supposed to fetch didn’t come (…)•hhh (1.0) he wasn’t answering his phone (.)•hh (1.0) and it’s like wha::::t (0.6) three a.m. in the morning (1.9) [coughs] and the:n he wasn’t answering his pho:::ne (2.0) [clears throat] my friend wanted to pee::: oh my gosh it was a disa(hh)ster […] By William Kelleher Student number 566746 Professor Tommaso Milani, Supervisor Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2018 ABSTRACT This is a linguistic ethnography that focuses on small stories (Bamberg and Georgakopoulou 2008, De Fina 2009, De Fina and Georgakopoulou 2015, Georgakopoulou 2006a and 2006b, 2008, 2014) within Bucholtz and Hall’s (2005) approach to identity and interaction. These two intersecting theoretical scaffoldings are completed by a geosemiotic approach (Scollon and Scollon 2003) to the discursive environment. The research therefore studies narrative interactions within communities of practice (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 1992, 2007) across the spaces and fields of the research site of Sandton, Johannesburg; investigating both participant behaviour and discursive environment, in particular with respect to the semiotic landscape. It is a ‘new’ ethnography in that its aim is to better understand the new spaces of South Africa’s cities (Duff 2014). Methodologically the narrative interactions of participants are plotted onto the space of Sandton using GIS technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Applicability of Location-Based Services to Delineate the State Public Transport Routes Integratedness Within the City of Johannesburg
    infrastructures Review Exploring the Applicability of Location-Based Services to Delineate the State Public Transport Routes Integratedness within the City of Johannesburg Brightnes Risimati 1,* and Trynos Gumbo 2 1 Department of Quality and Operations Management, University of Johannesburg, Corner of Siemert and Beit Streets, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa 2 Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Johannesburg, Corner of Siemert and Beit Streets, Doornfontein, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-783-326-246 Received: 30 May 2018; Accepted: 25 July 2018; Published: 1 August 2018 Abstract: In the past decade, Johannesburg has actively participated in the investment and development of the Gautrain and Rea Vaya public transportation modes. However, the state of route networks connectedness amongst the two public transport modes has not been well documented. Thus, this study aimed to delineate the extent of routes network integration among the two modes. The study adopted a phenomenological case study survey design which applied a mixed-method approach to gather spatial, qualitative and quantitative data. Crowd sourced datasets from Facebook and Twitter were collected, and analyzed using the kriging interpolation method and descriptive statistics. Key informant interviews were also used to unpack the status quo of the two modes. Results indicate that there are limited areas where the route networks between the two modes are currently integrated. Variations in income levels may be a factor currently preventing inter-transfer between the two modes. The Rea Vaya has proven successful in improving accessibility to economic opportunities, with 70% of the social media posts reflecting positive views regarding route and travel timetables.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispossession, Displacement, and the Making of the Shared Minibus Taxi in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa, 1930-Present
    Sithutha Isizwe (“We Carry the Nation”): Dispossession, Displacement, and the Making of the Shared Minibus Taxi in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa, 1930-Present A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Elliot Landon James IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Allen F. Isaacman & Helena Pohlandt-McCormick November 2018 Elliot Landon James 2018 copyright Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................. ii List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................iii Prologue .......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................... 17 Introduction: Dispossession and Displacement: Questions Framing Thesis Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................... 94 Historical Antecedents of the Shared Minibus Taxi: The Cape Colony, 1830-1930 Chapter 3 ..................................................................................................................... 135 Apartheid, Forced Removals, and Public Transportation in Cape Town, 1945-1978 Chapter 4 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Segregation and Apartheid in Twentieth-Century South Africa
    SEGREGATION AND APARTHEID IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SOUTH AFRICA ‘This is an outstanding collection…gathering the harvest of twenty years of intense scholarly and political debate. Jim Campbell, Northwestern University, Illinois ‘Well-known to South Africanists as individual contributions, this collection of seminal essays deserves, and will now find, a wider and more multidisciplinary audience.’ C.R.D.Halisi, Indiana University Beinart and Dubow’s selection of some of the most important essays on racial segregation and apartheid in twentieth-century South Africa provides an unparalleled introduction to this contentious and absorbing subject. The volume includes: • a specially written introduction by the editors which contextualizes the historiographical controversy, taking into account the 1994 election and associated changes; • explanatory notes and article summaries to improve the accessibility of the material; • a glossary of unusual terms to facilitate understanding. William Beinart is Reader in History at the University of Bristol. Saul Dubow is Lecturer in History at the School of African and Asian Studies, University of Sussex. Rewriting Histories Rewriting Histories focuses on historical themes where standard conclusions are facing a major challenge. Each book presents 8 to 10 papers (edited and annotated where necessary) at the forefront of current research and interpretation, offering students an accessible way to engage with contemporary debates. Series editor Jack R.Censer is Professor of History at George Mason University REWRITING
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit System
    This report is publicly available on the NYC Global Partners’ Innovation Exchange website www.nyc.gov/globalpartners/innovationexchange Best Practice: Bus Rapid Transit System REPORT UPDATED: MARCH 21, 2012 CITY: JOHANNESBURG POLICY AREAS: CLIMATE CHANGE; TRANSPORTATION BEST PRACTICE Launched in 2006, Johannesburg’s Rea Vaya, which means ―we are going,‖ is the first Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in South Africa. The Rea Vaya is a joint project between the City of Johannesburg and private partners. The development of low -carbon transport in Johannesburg has positioned the City as a leader in tackling climate change and now serves as an example for other African cities. ISSUE With increasing congestion on the roads, a rapidly growing population and an inadequate public transportation system, Johannesburg has faced the challenge of developing new transportation solutions that would not only be safe, affordable and fast, but would also improve the quality of life of its residents. In an effort to improve public transportation and address safety issues, and accelerated all the more by preparations for the 2010 World Cup, the City of Johannesburg launched a transportation action plan in 2005 to move toward a more sustainable, low-carbon transport system. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES By 2020, the City plans to roll out 122 kilometers (75.8 miles) of mainline BRT corridors served by 150 stations and 250 kilometers (155.3 miles) of formal feeder routes. The long-term objective is to provide a network of some 330 kilometers (205 miles) of lanes that are easily accessible to more than 80% of the people of Johannesburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Inquiry Into Land Based Public Passenger Transport Main Report
    MARKET INQUIRY INTO LAND BASED PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT MAIN REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION 19 February 2020 i Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... ii List of figures .......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 1. MARKET INQUIRY PROCESS................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND TO THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SECTOR IN SOUTH AFRICA ...................... 9 3. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK................................................................................................. 26 4. PUBLIC TRANSPORT AS AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM .......................................................... 41 5. SUBSIDIES IN THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SECTOR ............................................................. 61 6. THE RAIL SECTOR .................................................................................................................. 91 7. SUBSIDISED BUS CONTRACTS IN URBAN AREAS ........................................................... 126 8. RURAL TRANSPORTATION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 BOMMASTANDI of ALEXANDRA TOWNSHIP
    Chapter 1 BOMMASTANDI OF ALEXANDRA TOWNSHIP 1.1. Background In 1912 the following billboard written in Sotho, Zulu and English appeared in Alexandra Township advertising freehold properties. First, this advert points to the obvious; Africans were already engaging in private property at the turn of the 20th century. This township was subdivided into 2,500 stands which were sold to individuals. Title deeds were given to the individuals once payment was concluded. Second, it indicates that Africans were acquiring private property away from a „traditional village‟ where access to property is said to be communal. A closer look at the acquisition processes of such properties unsettles the notion of private property as individual. It becomes increasingly clear in the study that in spite of the naming of an individual in the titled deed it was not uncommon for family resources to be pooled during acquisition of the said property and hence a shared ownership among members of extended families would be understood. The following conversations attest to some of these experiences. Mme Mihloti explains how her parents and her siblings purchased their properties. 1 Ko 15th o ka re ke nako e abuti a bereka le mosu ausi, ke bona ba neng ba thusa mokgalabe. ......... Bona ke itse ba berekile ba thusa, ba ntshitse chelete ausi le abuti, ena Lucas. …….1 (It seemes like when my brother and sister were working, they are the ones who helped the old man with purchasing the property at 15th Avenue. I do know that they contributed some money helping our father in acquiring the properties…… Another example is drawn from mme Hunadi‟s family.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Community Social
    This report was developed by Freedom House under the Justice as a right in Southern Africa project. For more information about Freedom House visit our website at www.freedomhouse.org Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. OUR RESEARCH: OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES .............................................. 4 3. SOCIAL COHESION: A CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING ...................................................................... 5 4. SOCIAL COHESION AND XENOPHOBIC EXCLUSION IN SOUTH AFRICA ............................................... 7 5.1 Social Cohesion in Contemporary South Africa ........................................................................... 7 5.2 Xenophobia and Related Violence in Post-apartheid South Africa ............................................ 8 5. FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................ 11 5.1 Social Cohesion challenges and opportunities in diverse communities................................... 11 5.1.1 Socio-economic deprivation ............................................................................................... 11 5.1.2 Low levels of social integration.......................................................................................... 12 5.1.3 Negative attitudes and perceptions towards outsiders ...................................................
    [Show full text]