The Influence of Soil Moisture on the Planetary Boundary Layer and On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MARCH 2013 Z H O U A N D G E E R T S 1061 The Influence of Soil Moisture on the Planetary Boundary Layer and on Cumulus Convection over an Isolated Mountain. Part I: Observations XIN ZHOU AND BART GEERTS University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming (Manuscript received 18 May 2012, in final form 29 August 2012) ABSTRACT Data collected around the Santa Catalina Mountains in Arizona as part of the Cumulus Photogrammetric, In Situ and Doppler Observations (CuPIDO) experiment during the 2006 summer monsoon season are used to investigate the effect of soil moisture on the surface energy balance, boundary layer (BL) characteristics, thermally forced orographic circulations, and orographic cumulus convection. An unusual wet spell allows separation of the two-month campaign in a wet and a dry soil period. Days in the wet soil period tend to have a higher surface latent heat flux, lower soil and air temperatures, a more stable and shallower BL, and weaker solenoidal forcing resulting in weaker anabatic flow, in comparison with days in the dry soil period. The wet soil period is also characterized by higher humidity and moist static energy in the BL, implying a lower cu- mulus cloud base and higher convective available potential energy. Therefore, this period witnesses rather early growth of orographic cumulus convection, growing rapidly to the cumulonimbus stage, often before noon, and producing precipitation rather efficiently, with relatively little lightning. Data alone do not allow discrimination between soil moisture and advected airmass characteristics in explaining these differences. Hence, the need for a numerical sensitivity experiment, in Part II of this study. 1. Introduction (e.g., Sellers et al. 1992). Thus, soil moisture is a critical parameter determining CBL characteristics (e.g., Zhang Warm-season deep convection in the western United and Anthes 1982). However, the impact of soil moisture States is strongly diurnally modulated, with cumulus on mountain-scale circulations and on the growth of convection initiating close to solar noon and a maximum orographic convection is less obvious. That is the topic in lightning and precipitation in the midafternoon of the present study. This paper (Part I) explores ob- (Watson et al. 1994b; Nesbitt and Zipser 2003; Carbone servations. A companion paper (Part II) uses numerical et al. 2002; Demko et al. 2009). Satellite imagery shows simulations. how this convection almost invariably initiates over This study should be framed in the broader question mountain ranges and not the surrounding lower terrain about the relationship between soil moisture and warm- (Banta and Schaaf 1987). Clearly the convection and season precipitation. Many numerical experiments have mountain-scale circulations that control this spatial been designed to address this question (e.g., Sun and distribution are tightly coupled to the land surface, es- Ogura 1979; Carlson et al. 1983; Rowntree and Bolton pecially the surface sensible heat flux that controls the 1983; Atlas et al. 1993; Koster et al. 2004). Observational daily evolution of the convective boundary layer (CBL). studies on this topic are relatively scarce, especially in The sensible heat flux mainly depends on the magnitude complex terrain. The simulated soil moisture feedback of the surface net radiation, and on soil moisture, which on precipitation over flat terrain can be positive or is the primary control in the partitioning of the avail- negative, mainly depending on scale, but also depending able energy between sensible and latent heat fluxes on numerical factors such as the surface and boundary layer schemes and the cumulus parameterization method (Pan et al. 1996; Gallus and Segal 2000; Hohenegger et al. Corresponding author address: Bart Geerts, Department of At- mospheric Science, University of Wyoming, 6034 Engineering 2009). Building, Laramie, WY 82071. The main positive feedback mechanism is that moist E-mail: [email protected] soil enriches BL air with moist static energy, which DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00150.1 Ó 2013 American Meteorological Society Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/01/21 05:36 AM UTC 1062 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 141 reduces convective inhibition (CIN) and increases con- vective available potential energy (CAPE; Betts et al. 1996; Eltahir 1998; Scha¨r et al. 1999; Pal and Eltahir 2001; Findell and Eltahir 2003a,b; Wood 1997; Hohenegger et al. 2009). Another positive feedback is that increased soil moisture decreases surface albedo (Idso et al. 1975) and thus increases net radiation [and boundary layer (BL) moist static energy] under clear skies (Eltahir 1998). Boundary layer clouds may complicate this re- sponse: the addition of water vapor into the CBL may increase low-level cloudiness and stability (Hohenegger et al. 2009), but the resulting surface net shortwave radiation reduction may be compensated by a reduced net longwave radiation loss, unless the clouds are con- fined to the daytime (Scha¨r et al. 1999; Pal and Eltahir 2001). The main negative feedback mechanism is that moist soil reduces the sensible heat flux, and thus the daytime maximum temperature, the CBL depth, and the ability of air parcels to overcome CIN (Findell and Eltahir FIG. 1. Topography of the Santa Catalina Mountains, showing 2003a,b; Ek and Holtslag 2004; Hohenegger et al. 2009). the location of 10 ISFF stations (triangles are regular stations, di- amonds are stations with flux and soil measurements), the highest Another negative feedback relates to spatial heteroge- peak Mt. Lemmon (2791 m MSL), the flux tower at Mt. Bigelow neity: in a flat landscape with mesoscale soil moisture (2583 m MSL), the two stereo-cameras mounted on a rooftop at variations, the wetter soil regions will be relatively cool, the University of Arizona, and the National Weather Service resulting in mesoscale subsidence as BL air diverges KTUS radiosonde launch site in 2006. toward the drier, warmer patches, where the CBL be- comes deeper and deep convection may erupt (Walker and Rowntree 1977; Sun and Ogura 1979; Carlson et al. and orographic precipitation is complicated also be- 1983; Taylor et al. 2007; Nair et al. 2011). The flow to- cause deep convection produces outflow boundaries that ward warmer patches is density driven (solenoidal). The can trigger secondary convection (Demko and Geerts minimum scale supporting significant solenoidal BL 2010b), and because the complex terrain may aid or stifle circulations is at least an order of magnitude larger than mesoscale convective organization (Nesbitt et al. 2008; the CBL eddies [i.e., at least O(10 km)], depending Hauck et al. 2011). mainly on surface contrast, ambient wind, and BL depth To make progress on the topic of soil moisture impact (Chen and Avissar 1994). on warm-season precipitation in complex terrain, this These and other factors need to be considered in study focuses on the rather simpler component questions complex terrain. Elevated surface heating leads to sig- of how soil moisture affects CBL growth, mountain-scale nificant pressure perturbations (Geerts et al. 2008) re- convergence, and initial cumulus growth. Part I of this sulting in mountain-scale solenoidal BL circulations study is entirely observational. Its primary data source is (e.g., Banta 1986) especially when soils are dry (Ookouchi a network of surface weather and flux stations deployed et al. 1984). The initiation of cumulus convection over or for two months (July–August 2006) around a rather iso- near the high terrain is due to a combination of terrain- lated mountain in southern Arizona. induced convergent flow (Banta 1984; Kottmeier et al. A 5-day period of heavy rainfall occurred across 2008; Barthlott et al. 2011) and elevated heating and southeast Arizona in late July 2006, yielding widespread early elimination of CIN (Demko et al. 2009; Demko near-saturated soil conditions. About 118 mm of rain and Geerts 2010a,b). Clearly orographic convection fell between 27–31 July around the Santa Catalina would be most effective if the surrounding valley soil is Range (SCR; Fig. 1), mostly at night, causing some rare moist (with lush vegetation) and the mountain soil dry, local flooding (Damiani et al. 2008). This event was since the solenoidal circulations due to the terrain and driven by a synoptic-scale moisture surge, which is not due to soil moisture would have the same sign, but in uncommon in Arizona in summer (e.g., Adams and reality a history of precipitation mainly over mountains Comrie 1997). This spell was unusual because of a typically leads to an opposite soil moisture (and vege- series of nocturnal organized convective systems, aided tation) distribution. The relation between soil moisture by high surface humidity and a weak but persistent Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/01/21 05:36 AM UTC MARCH 2013 Z H O U A N D G E E R T S 1063 upper-tropospheric cyclone. During this spell the air and humidity sensors and 3D sonic anemometers at a mass was as moist tropical as commonly observed far- height of 10 m above ground level (AGL). The latent ther south along the Sierra Madre Occidental in summer and sensible heat (LH and SH) fluxes are estimated (e.g., Higgins et al. 2006). The National Weather Service using the eddy correlation technique at 5-min intervals (NWS) forecast office at Tucson, Arizona (KTUS), re- based on 30-min running averages. The SH flux is pro- corded a total of 214 mm of rain in July and August portional to the buoyancy flux; that is, it includes the 0 0 2012, which is 193% of normal. While this unusual wet virtual temperature correction (w uy), where w is verti- spell makes it difficult to understand the more typical cal velocity and uy virtual potential temperature. The nature of land–atmosphere coupling in this region soil heat flux is computed using the gradient method. We (Small 2001), it does provide a strong regional-scale also use corresponding data at 10 m AGL from a flux signal to examine soil moisture impact.