DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 250/Monday, December 31, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 250/Monday, December 31, 2012 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules 76979 installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. The Proposed Amendment (3) For engines with Full Authority Digital We also estimate that one hour would Electronic Controls, replace the Accordingly, under the authority Hydromechanical Unit to fuel flowmeter fuel be required per engine to accomplish delegated to me by the Administrator, the actions required by this AD. The tubes, P/Ns 1383M12G01 and 1374M30G01, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part with a part eligible for installation. average labor rate is $85 per hour. We 39 as follows: (4) Replace supporting bracket, P/N also estimate that the required parts will 1321M88P001A, and spray shields, P/Ns cost about $370 per engine. We estimate PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 1606M57G01, 1606M57G03, and that the cost of the idle leak check is DIRECTIVES 1775M61G01 with one-piece supporting $1,000 per engine. Based on these bracket, P/N 2021M83G01. figures, we estimate the total cost of the 1. The authority citation for part 39 (5) Perform an idle leak check after proposed AD to U.S. operators is continues to read as follows: accomplishing paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(3), $3,275,231. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. or (f)(4), or any combination thereof. Authority for this Rulemaking § 39.13 [Amended] (g) Prohibition After the effective date of this AD, do not Title 49 of the United States Code 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness install any of the following parts into any GE specifies the FAA’s authority to issue CF6–80C2 series turbofan engines: P/Ns rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, directive (AD): 1321M42G01, 1321M88P001A, 1334M88G01, section 106, describes the authority of 2012–XX–XX General Electric Company: 1374M30G01, 1383M12G01, 1606M57G01, the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Docket No. FAA–2012–0817; Directorate 1606M57G03, and 1775M61G01. Identifier 99–NE–24–AD. Aviation Programs’’ describes in more (h) Alternative Methods of Compliance detail the scope of the Agency’s (a) Comments Due Date (AMOCs) authority. We must receive comments by March 1, The Manager, Engine Certification Office, We are issuing this rulemaking under 2013. FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the authority described in Subtitle VII, the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to (b) Affected ADs Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: make your request. This AD supersedes AD 2000–04–14, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that (i) Related Information section, Congress charges the FAA with Amendment 39–11597 (65 FR 10698, February 29, 2000). promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in (1) For more information about this AD, contact Kasra Sharifi, Aerospace Engineer, (c) Applicability air commerce by prescribing regulations Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & for practices, methods, and procedures This AD applies to all General Electric Propeller Directorate, 12 New England the Administrator finds necessary for Company (GE) CF6–80C2 A1/A2/A3/A5/A8/ Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; safety in air commerce. This regulation A5F/B1/B2/B4/B5F/B6/B1F/B2F/B4F/B6F/ phone: 781–238–7773; fax: 781–238–7199; is within the scope of that authority B7F/D1F turbofan engines with fuel tubes, email: [email protected]. because it addresses an unsafe condition part number (P/N) 1321M42G01, (2) For guidance on the replacements, refer that is likely to exist or develop on 1334M88G01, 1374M30G01, 1383M12G01, to GE Alert Service Bulletins CF6–80C2 SB 1606M57G03, 1606M57G01, or 1775M61G01, 73–A0224, CF6–80C2 SB 73–A0231, CF6– products identified in this rulemaking or supporting bracket, P/N 1321M88P001A, action. 80C2 SB 73–A0401, and CF6–80C2 SB 73– installed. 0242. Regulatory Findings (d) Unsafe Condition (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact General Electric Company, We determined that this proposed AD This AD was prompted by several reports GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way, would not have federalism implications of fuel leaks, and two reports of engine fire, Cincinnati, OH 45215, phone: (513) 552– due to mis-assembled supporting brackets on under Executive Order 13132. This 3272; email: [email protected]. You may view the fuel tube connecting the flowmeter to the this service information at the FAA, Engine proposed AD would not have a Integrated Drive Generator (IDG) fuel-oil & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England substantial direct effect on the States, on cooler. We are proposing this AD to prevent Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For the relationship between the national high-pressure fuel leaks caused by improper information on the availability of this Government and the States, or on the seating of fuel tube flanges, which could material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. distribution of power and result in an engine fire and damage to the responsibilities among the various airplane. Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on December 20, 2012. levels of government. (e) Compliance Robert J. Ganley, For the reasons discussed above, I Comply with this AD within the certify this proposed regulation: compliance times specified, unless already Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory done. Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. action’’ under Executive Order 12866, [FR Doc. 2012–31362 Filed 12–28–12; 8:45 am] (f) Replacement (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under BILLING CODE 4910–13–P the DOT Regulatory Policies and After the effective date of this AD, if the fuel tubes are disconnected for any reason, or Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, at the next engine shop visit, whichever 1979), occurs first, replace the fuel tubes and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation brackets with improved tubes and brackets AGENCY in Alaska, and eligible for installation. For on-wing (4) Will not have a significant maintenance, replace only tubes and brackets 40 CFR Part 152 economic impact, positive or negative, that have been disconnected. Do the [EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0305; FRL–9339–1] on a substantial number of small entities following: RIN 2070–AJ79 under the criteria of the Regulatory (1) Replace the fuel flowmeter to IDG fuel- oil cooler fuel tube, P/N 1321M42G01, with Flexibility Act. a part eligible for installation. Pesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 (2) For engines with Power Management Exemption Controls, replace the Main Engine Control to Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation fuel flowmeter fuel tube, P/N 1334M88G01, AGENCY: Environmental Protection safety, Safety. with a part eligible for installation. Agency (EPA). VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:33 Dec 28, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM 31DEP1 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 76980 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Proposed Rules ACTION: Proposed rule. Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide C. What action is the agency taking? Programs, Environmental Protection SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to more Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., EPA is proposing to more clearly clearly describe the active and inert Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone describe the active and inert ingredients ingredients permitted in products number: (703) 605–1193; fax number: permitted in products eligible for the eligible for the exemption from (703) 305–5884; email address: exemption from regulation for minimum regulation for minimum risk pesticides. [email protected]. risk pesticides (40 CFR 152.25(f)). EPA EPA is proposing to reorganize these SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: is proposing to reorganize these lists by lists with a focus on clarity and adding specific chemical identifiers. transparency by adding specific I. General Information The identifiers would make it clearer to chemical identifiers. The identifiers A. Does this action apply to me? manufacturers; the public; and Federal, would make it clearer to manufacturers; state, and tribal inspectors the specific You may be potentially affected by the public; and Federal, state, and tribal ingredients that are permitted in inspectors which ingredients are this action if you manufacture, minimum risk pesticide products. EPA permitted in minimum risk pesticide distribute, sell, or use minimum risk is also proposing to modify the label products. EPA is also proposing to pesticide products. Minimum risk modify the label requirements in the pesticide products are exempt from requirements in the exemption to exemption to require the use of specific Federal regulation, and are described in require the use of specific common common chemical names in lists of 40 CFR 152.25(f). The following list of chemical names in lists of ingredients ingredients on minimum risk pesticide North American Industrial on minimum risk pesticide product product labels, and to require producer Classification System (NAICS) codes is labels, and to require producer contact contact information on the label. Once not intended to be exhaustive, but rather information on the label. final, these proposed changes would provides a guide to help readers D. Why is EPA taking this action? maintain the availability of minimum determine whether this document risk pesticide products while providing applies to them. Potentially affected The primary goal of this proposal is more consistent information for entities may include: to clarify the conditions of exemption • consumers, clearer regulations for Manufacturers of these products, for minimum risk pesticides by making producers, and easier identification by which includes pesticide and other clearer the specific ingredients that are states, tribes and EPA as to whether a agricultural chemical manufacturers permitted in minimum risk pesticide product is in compliance with the (NAICS codes 325320 and 325311), as products. EPA has exempted from the exemption. well as other manufacturers in similar requirement of registration certain industries such as animal feed (NAICS DATES: Comments must be received on pesticide products if they are composed code 311119), cosmetics (NAICS code or before April 1, 2013.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sodium Citrate As Processing Aid (Anticoagulant) for Spray Dried Blood Products
    From: Protena Nicaragua Proteína Naturales, S.A. Km 27, Panamericana Norte Nicaragua To: Program Manager, USDA/AMS/TM/NOP, Room 4008-So., Ag Stop 0268, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250 Phone: (202) 720–3252 Fax: (202) 205–7808. [email protected] (electronic submission) Subject: Petition: Sodium Citrate as Processing Aid (Anticoagulant) for Spray Dried Blood Products In this petition, we address each of the Items listed in the new NOP 3011: National List Petition Guidelines (effective March 11, 2016) Most all of the information contained in this petition has already been made available to USDA-NOP in the Technical Evaluation Report for Citric acid and Salts (Handling/Processing), compiled by OMRI for the USDA National Organic Program, Feb 17, 2015 (See attachment # 1 – Sodium Citrate TR2015) https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Citric%20Acid%20TR%202015.pdf. Direct quotes from this report are “italics”. Since citric acid is a necessary precursor for sodium citrate, citric acid is also an essential part of this evaluation. Sodium citrate is produced when citric acid is mixed with sodium hydroxide or sodium bicarbonate. Item A.1 — This is a petition to include Sodium Citrate in the List of Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production (§ 205.601). If approved, sodium citrate would be allowed as synthetic organic ingredient (anticoagulant) for processing bovine blood after collection at slaughter, so the blood will maintain a liquid state while being processed into organic crop fertilizer (spray dried blood meal and spray dried hemoglobin). Item A.2 — The OFPA Category (7 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Safety Assessment of Citric Acid, Inorganic Citrate Salts, and Alkyl Citrate Esters As Used in Cosmetics
    Final Report On the Safety Assessment of Citric Acid, Inorganic Citrate Salts, and Alkyl Citrate Esters as Used in Cosmetics March 27, 2012 The 2012 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D., Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is F. Alan Andersen, Ph.D. This report was prepared by Monice M. Fiume, Senior Scientific Analyst/Writer and Bart A. Heldreth, Ph.D., Chemist. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1101 17th Street, NW, Suite 412 ♢ Washington, DC 20036-4702 ♢ ph 202.331.0651 ♢ fax 202.331.0088 ♢ [email protected] ABSTRACT: The CIR Expert Panel assessed the safety of citric acid, 12 inorganic citrate salts, and 20 alkyl citrate esters as used in cosmetics, concluding that these ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration. Citric acid is reported to function as a pH adjuster, chelating agent, or fragrance ingredient. Some of the salts are also reported to function as chelating agents, and a number of the citrates are reported to function as skin conditioning agents. The Panel reviewed available animal and clinical data; because, citric acid, calcium citrate, ferric citrate, manganese citrate, potassium citrate, sodium citrate, diammonium citrate, isopropyl citrate, stearyl citrate, and triethyl citrate are GRAS direct food additives, dermal toxicity was the focus for these ingredients in this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Trace Minerals
    United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service | National Organic Program Document Cover Sheet https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/national-list/petitioned Document Type: ☐ National List Petition or Petition Update A petition is a request to amend the USDA National Organic Program’s National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances (National List). Any person may submit a petition to have a substance evaluated by the National Organic Standards Board (7 CFR 205.607(a)). Guidelines for submitting a petition are available in the NOP Handbook as NOP 3011, National List Petition Guidelines. Petitions are posted for the public on the NOP website for Petitioned Substances. ☒ Technical Report A technical report is developed in response to a petition to amend the National List. Reports are also developed to assist in the review of substances that are already on the National List. Technical reports are completed by third-party contractors and are available to the public on the NOP website for Petitioned Substances. Contractor names and dates completed are available in the report. Trace Minerals Livestock 1 Identification of Petitioned Substance 2 3 “Trace minerals” is a term for multiple nutritional elements added to livestock, poultry, and companion 4 animal diets in micro quantities only (i.e., measured in milligrams per pound or small units) (AAFCO 5 2019). While the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) lists only cobalt, copper, iodine, 6 iron, manganese, and zinc as trace minerals added to animal feeds (AAFCO 2019), this technical report also 7 discusses chromium, molybdenum, and selenium, which are all commonly found in commercial trace 8 mineral products on the market for inclusion in animal feeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 248/Monday, December 28, 2015
    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 248 / Monday, December 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 80653 individually or cumulatively have a (2) This safety zone is closed to all contact information on the product’s significant effect on the human vessel traffic, except as may be label. These changes will provide more environment. This rule involves the permitted by the Captain of the Port, consistent information for consumers establishment of a safety zone for the Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene and clearer regulations for producers, New Year’s Eve firework displays on the representative. and will simplify compliance Main Branch of the Chicago River. It is (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of determination by states, tribes, and EPA. categorically excluded from further the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan DATES: This final rule is effective review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure is any Coast Guard commissioned, February 26, 2016. The compliance date 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An warrant or petty officer who has been for the requirements to label ingredients environmental analysis checklist designated by the Captain of the Port, with a label display name and to supporting this determination and a Lake Michigan to act on his or her provide company contact information Categorical Exclusion Determination are behalf. on the label is February 26, 2019. (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter available in the docket where indicated ADDRESSES: or operate within the safety zone shall The docket for this action, under ADDRESSES. We seek any identified by docket identification (ID) comments or information that may lead contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0305, is to the discovery of a significant available at http://www.regulations.gov environmental impact from this rule.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/091533 Al 1 June 20 17 (0 1.06.20 17) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/091533 Al 1 June 20 17 (0 1.06.20 17) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: Plaza 721/2340, 974 Centre Road, PO Box 291 5 Wilming A23L 33/10 (201 6.01) CI2N 9/10 (2006.01) ton, Delaware 19805 (US). A61K 31/716 (2006.01) C08L 5/00 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C 37/00 (2006.01) C08L 5/02 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12P 19/04 (2006.01) A23L 33/135 (2016.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, CUP 19/08 (2006.01) A23L 33/21 (201 6.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, CUP 19/16 (2006.01) A61K 8/73 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, CUP 19/18 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, PCT/US2016/063233 MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (22) International Filing Date: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, 22 November 2016 (22.1 1.2016) TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (25) Filing Language: English ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Inert Ingredients Eligible for FIFRA 25(B) Pesticide Products, US
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES Inert Ingredients Eligible for FIFRA 25(b) Pesticide Products Last Updated December 20, 2010 Provided below are the inert ingredients that are eligible for inclusion in pesticide products under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)’s Section 25(b). This listing of minimal risk inert ingredients updates what has been historically referred to as “4A” under Pesticide Registration Notice 2000-6. 1. Commonly consumed food commodities, animal feed items, and edible fats and oils as described in 40 CFR 180.950(a), (b), and (c) may be used as inert ingredients in FIFRA Section 25(b) pesticide products applied to food use sites (e.g., food crops, animals used for food) and in FIFRA Section 25(b) pesticide products applied to nonfood use sites (e.g., ornamental plants, highway right-of- ways, rodent control). Specific chemical substances listed under 40 CFR 180.950(e) that are also acceptable for use as inert ingredients in FIFRA Section 25(b) pesticide products are included in the table below. 2. In addition to (1) above, the following inert ingredients are also eligible for inclusion in FIFRA Section 25(b) pesticide products. These ingredients are listed by CAS Registry Number and chemical name (common names are given, with systematic names included as synonyms in brackets where applicable). In addition, this listing has two columns to indicate whether the inert ingredient can be used in FIFRA Section 25(b) products applied to food use and/or nonfood use sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Properties of Chemicals in PAC Revision 27 Listing
    LLNL-TR-625492 Physical Properties of Chemicals in PAC Revision 27 Listing M. A. Johnson March 8, 2013 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Physical Properties of Chemicals in PAC Revision 27 Listing 1 Purpose The purpose of this chemical physical property listing is to provide data required to apply the DOE SCAPA Protective Action Criteria (PAC) values to calculation of the LLNL Quantity (Q) Value thresholds for facility chemical hazard classification. This chemical physical property listing based on the DOE SCAPA Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Revision 27 listing Identifies: 1. Physical state at 25°C (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Control of the Size, Shape, and Polydispersity of Anisotropic Silica Colloids
    Synthetic control of the size, shape, and polydispersity of anisotropic silica colloids Ryan P. Murphy,† Kunlun Hong,‡ and Norman J. Wagner†* † Center for Molecular and Engineering Thermodynamics & Center for Neutron Science, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States ‡ Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States KEYWORDS: Nanoparticles, emulsions, anisotropic colloids, sol-gel, silica, rods 1 ABSTRACT The microstructure and rheological properties of colloidal suspensions depend on particle size and shape. This work aims to further control the size, shape, and polydispersity of anisotropic silica colloids, to reduce particle size, and to provide additional mechanistic insights on a prevalent, water-in-oil emulsion synthesis method. Key findings show that the dimensions of anisotropic silica particles can be systematically varied by approximately five-fold, with a limiting minimum particle size (D ≈ 60 nm, L ≈ 300 nm) obtained from emulsions with excess polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and sodium citrate. The synthesis conditions are identified and discussed for which the emulsion composition, temperature, sonication, polymer entanglements, mixing, and other perturbations may induce or mitigate emulsion instabilities, citrate precipitation, a competing mechanism of templated growth, termination of anisotopic growth, irregular silica structures, and fiber formation. An improved mechanistic understanding
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. 23 Table 4: Pacs by Chemical Name
    Table 4: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) Rev 23 based on applicable AEGLs, ERPGs, or TEELs (chemicals listed in alphabetical order) PAC Rev 23 – August 2007 Table 4 presents an alphabetical listing of the chemicals in the PAC data set and provides Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers (CAS RNs),1 PAC data, and technical information on the source of the PACs. Table 4 provides PACs for TEEL-0 (i.e., PAC-0), PAC-1, PAC-2, and PAC-3 in units of mass per unit volume (mg/m3) with the ppm to mg/m3 conversion (carried out at 25ºC and 760 mmHg) performed before rounding. The columns presented in Table 4 provide the following information: Heading Definition No. The ordered numbering of the chemicals as they appear in this alphabetical listing. Chemical The common name of the chemical compound. Compound CAS RN The Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number for this chemical. TEEL-0 This is the threshold concentration below which most people will experience no appreciable risk of health effects. This PAC is always based on TEEL-0 because AEGL-0 or ERPG-0 values do not exist. PAC-1 Based on the applicable AEGL-1, ERPG-1, or TEEL-1 value. PAC-2 Based on the applicable AEGL-2, ERPG-2, or TEEL-3 value. PAC-3 Based on the applicable AEGL-3, ERPG-3, or TEEL-3 value. Source of PACs Technical comments by the developers of the PAC data set that indicate the source of the data used to derive PAC values. The term “SAR,” often in red font, stands for “Structure Activity Relationships.” Other abbreviations are defined below or in the introductory material found at: http://www.hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/WSHP/chem_safety/teel.html/.
    [Show full text]
  • Remington Education Pharmaceutics Remington Education the Remington Education Series Is a New Series of Indispensable Guides Created Specifically for Pharmacy Students
    Remington Education Pharmaceutics Remington Education The Remington Education series is a new series of indispensable guides created specifically for pharmacy students. Providing a simple and concise overview of the subject matter, the guides aim to complement major textbooks used. The guides assist students with integrating the science of pharmacy into practice by providing a summary of key information in the relevant subject area along with cases and questions and answers for self assessment (as subject matter allows). Students will be given a practical way to check their knowledge and track the progress of their learning before, during, and after a course. Key features of the texts include: Learning Objectives Tips and Tricks Boxes Key Points Boxes Illustrations Assessment Questions Further Reading The Remington Education series is a must-have for all pharmacy students wanting to test their knowledge, gain a concise overview of key subject areas and prepare for examinations. Covering all areas of the undergraduate pharmacy degree, the first titles in the series include: Drug Information and Literature Evaluation Pharmaceutics Introduction to Pharmacotherapy Physical Pharmacy Law & Ethics in Pharmacy Practice Remington Education Pharmaceutics Shelley Chambers Fox Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University Published by Pharmaceutical Press 1 Lambeth High Street, London SE1 7JN, UK # Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain 2014 is a trade mark of Pharmaceutical Press Pharmaceutical Press is the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Typeset by OKS Group, Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain by TJ International, Padstow, Cornwall ISBN 978 0 85711 070 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecule at Special Points, Where There Is a Particularly Strong Stray Field, Say, for Example, Where the Amino and Acid Groups of the Amino Acids Come Together
    272 MARTIN H. FISCHER AND MARIAN 0. HOOKER. molecule at special points, where there is a particularly strong stray field, say, for example, where the amino and acid groups of the amino acids come together. It may be that later work will throw light on this point. URBANA.1.s [COiYTRIBUTION FROM THE EICHBERGLABORATORY OF PHYSIOLOGY IN THE umm OF CINCINNATI.] ON THE SWELLING OF GELATIN IN POLYBASIC ACIDS AND THEIR SALTS. BY MARTINH. FISCHBRAND MARIAN0. HOOKER Received October 31, 1917 I. Introductory. It is now safe to conclude that the amount of water absorbed by any living cell, organ or organism, is essentially dependent upon its content of hydrophilic colloids and the state of these. As proof for this mybe cited the complete analogy which exists between the laws governing the absorption of water by protoplasm and those governing the same phe- nomenon as observed in various simple colloids-more particularly the proteins-under physiological and pathological conditions.* On such a colloid-chemical basis it is now easy to account for the fairly constant amount of water held by living cells and tissues normally and so to ex- plain, for example, their so-called normal “turgor.” But under patho- logical conditions both in plants and in animals this normal degree of hydra- tion may be much increased, when we have before us the “excessive turgor” characteristic of various plant diseases, or the edema of the anintal path- ologists as this involves individual cells, organs, or the body as a whole. Edema may, in other words, be defined as a state of excessive hydration of the body colloids, while as “causes1’of the edema may be cited sub- stances or conditions which under the circumstances prevailing in liviilg protoplasm are capable of increasing its water holding powers to beyond the normal limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Cleaning Schools During COVID-19 Outbreak
    Guidance for Cleaning Schools During COVID-19 Outbreak The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a list of disinfectants approved to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Please visit the EPA’s website for additional details. Included here is a flowchart (Page 2) from the Healthy Schools Act that can assist in determining which products to use. If the product is a disinfectant, it is exempt from the notification, posting, reporting and Integrated Pest Management requirements, but the training requirements are still in effect. Only properly trained staff should conduct the cleaning operations to be compliant with California state law. Under no circumstances should cleaning or disinfecting be assigned to students. Each product will differ in its requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE), but those requirements should be followed. For example, if the package of disinfecting wipes says that the user should wear gloves, provide disposable or reusable rubber gloves to all staff using the wipes. Hand sanitizers and antimicrobial soaps are also exempt from these regulations. This fact sheet may be useful in explaining the difference. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has released cleaning and disinfection recommendations for schools and community organizations. These recommendations can be found on the CDC website. Also available from the CDC is general guidance for schools for the prevention of infectious disease transmission. Additional Resources: CDC United States Environmental Protection Agency California Department of Pesticide Regulation Are You Using A Lower-Risk Product? The Healthy Schools Act exempts some products because they are reduced risk or are used for health and safety purposes.
    [Show full text]