A Disability Legal Studies Analysis of Privilege and Neglect in Israeli Disability Policy
Between Charity, Welfare, and Warfare: A Disability Legal Studies Analysis of Privilege and Neglect in Israeli Disability Policy Sagit Mor* "Hidden and disregarded for too long, we are demanding not only rights and equal opportunity, but are demanding that the academy take on the nettlesome question of why we've been sequestered in the first place."' INTRODUCTION Throughout the last century, the modem welfare state has been widely considered a major source of rescue and relief for people with disabilities. By providing mechanisms of cure and care, so the common view goes, the welfare state has improved the social conditions of disabled people, rescuing them from a life of starvation and severe destitution. In this view, welfare provides a refuge, while the real responsibility for the persistent poverty of disabled people lies primarily with the structure of the market economy, with the existence of negative social attitudes, and with disability's "objective" and inherent limitations. In this Article, I challenge this view, arguing that although welfare has indeed provided some relief to people with disabilities, welfare laws and policies have also had a significant role in developing, furthering, and * LL.B., Tel Aviv University. LL.M. and J.S.D., NYU School of Law. This work was supported in part by the Ed Roberts Postdoctoral Fellowship in Disability Studies, at the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, funded by NIDRR #H133P020009. I would like to thank the following people for their support and helpful comments: Jerome Bruner, Oscar Chase, Christine Harrington, Sue Schweik, Aeyal Gross, Liat Ben-Moshe, Dafna Katz, Yair Sagy, Yofi Tirosh, the participants at the J.S.D.
[Show full text]