Arxiv:1802.01280V2 [Physics.App-Ph] 6 Feb 2018 Sinipatto N Neln Nbl N Nanocrystalli and Bulk in Problem

Home , Polarization density

arXiv:1802.01280v2 [physics.app-ph] 6 Feb 2018 sinipatto n neln nbl n nanocrystalli and bulk in problem. annealing this and proces implantation fabr synthesis ion easily diamond as be deposition can vapour diamond chemical in the centers of nor NV the optical-frequency the of However, the side micron. in same working the tra metamaterials at inci the lie classical is interface, light mode transmitted the (TH) and to incident magnetic perpendicular transverse a component When diamon negative the sign. of different permittivity a relative the modifies effectively aeiluigN etr ndaod ecnie nelectri an consider s We different possess sition permittivity diamond. electric in its of centers components NV using material n abnnntbs aebe rpsdt elz demandi realize to ot proposed and been centers have NV nanotubes, elect of carbon single composed and [36–38], qu devices, quantum field for hybrid magnetic promising merous 35], centers transfe [34, NV and field single initialize electric makes to signals diamond external of to r centers dipolar NV the in suppress b performed to have decoupling, diamond dynamical gyroscop by in realized solid-state p centers Highly-sensitive novel NV some temperature. example, For room manifest they 28]. [1, as plications 26] [25, investigation intense nlgecsooy[2,adlftm niern 2,24] [23, engineering enhancement lifetime emission and [22], spontaneous cosmology realize i analogue to subwavelength to used addition a been w In have transition so [9]. is magnetic refraction metamaterials negative a the double-negative inducing of of response difficulty magnetic the overcome hyperbo However, to permeability. and 8] permittivity [3, negative an architectures [6] composite phenomena sophisticated matter bey refraction, condensate lens simulating perfect [5], cloaking, science electromagnetic for e.g., used, Model NV-metamaterials Vcenters NV Metamaterials 3 A –A ceaial lutae nFg () nN etri center NV an 1(a), Fig. in illustrated schematically .––As 2 ⇋ VMtmtra:TnbeQatmHproi Metamateria Hyperbolic Quantum Tunable NV-Metamaterial: g,adlftm niern.Teeoe u rpslint proposal our Therefore, metamaterials. trans and engineering. heat centers enhancement, subwave lifetime emission to and spontaneous addition ogy, in In used be limit. can diffraction the beyond perlens eaaeilwt ual idwfrtengtv refract negative magnet the a for applying window by tunable tuned a dynamically with dispersion metamaterial and hyperbolic engineered a be that can demonstrate We metamaterial. 3 –O h te ad unu eie ae nnitrogen-vac on based devices quantum hand, other the .––On 6 E eso htntoe-aac N)cnesi imn a pr can diamond in centers (NV) nitrogen-vacancy that show We eateto hsc,TeUiest fMcia,AnArbo Ann Michigan, of University The Physics, of Department h Vcnesi imn ilngtvl epn oteele the to respond negatively will diamond in centers NV the , –Mtmtraswt eaierfato aeattracted have refraction negative with .––Metamaterials 3 –Isie yterpdpors nbt ed,hr eprop we here fields, both in progress rapid the by .––Inspired eateto ple hsc,X’nJatn University, Jiaotong Xi’an Physics, Applied of Department igAi, Qing 2 ejn opttoa cec eerhCne,Biig10 Beijing Center, Research Science Computational Beijing eateto hsc,ApidOtc ejn raMjrLa Major Area Beijing Optics Applied Physics, of Department 5 fCieeAaeyo niern hsc,Biig100084, Beijing Physics, Engineering of Academy Chinese of ejn opttoa cec eerhCne rdaeS Graduate & Center Research Science Computational Beijing ,2 1, 4 irgnVcnyCnesi Diamond in Centers Nitrogen-Vacancy 1 unu hsc n unu nomto Division, Information Quantum and Physics Quantum ES IE,Wk-h,Siaa3109,Japan 351-0198, Saitama Wako-shi, RIKEN, CEMS, egB Li, Peng-Bo ejn omlUiest,Biig107,China 100875, Beijing University, Normal Beijing ,3 1, e Qin, Wei n ooois[–2 r arctdt civ simultaneo achieve to fabricated are [9–12] topologies and gs hna pia lcrmgei edidcstetran the induces field electromagnetic optical an When igns. o n ula pn[94] n eprtr 4–9.Nu- [47–49]. temperature and [39–46], spin nuclear and ron s[1 ae nesmlso Vcnesi imn a be can diamond in centers NV of ensembles on based [31] es n ircinlmt[] nepitietfiaini fore in identification fingerprint [2], limit diffraction ond . metamaterial hyperbolic [18], focusing and 18] [17, maging oan eas h ie fteeeet hri r sub- are therein elements the of sizes the because domain, i o nent)mtmtraswr rpsd[31,19] [13–15, proposed were metamaterials indefinite) (or lic lxto.Sotust daaiiyhv ensuccessful been have adiabaticity to Shortcuts elaxation. ihN etr n hsoepicplcmoethas component principal one thus and centers NV with d ,4 1, ,a rdc frdaindmg n neln,a well as annealing, and damage radiation of product a as s, eesdDplreet[] nodrt elz negative realize to order In [7]. effect Doppler reversed d edaod h Vmtmtraspooe eesolve here proposed NV-metamaterials The diamond. ne sitdlgtwl engtvl erce,a ohthe both as refracted, negatively be will light nsmitted a hti ffcieysotn h rqec idwof window frequency the shortens effectively it that eak a oteitrae oeta ti icl ofabricate to difficult is it that Note interface. the to mal oete n a eepoe o ayitrsigap- interesting many for explored be can and roperties oeetsproiin 3,3] h ihsensitivity high The 33]. [32, superpositions coherent r nu esn fvrospyia aaees uhas such parameters, physical various of sensing antum 1] ple nha rnpr 2]adaosis[21], acoustics and [20] transport heat in applied [19], gtss[50–54]. tasks ng .P Sun, P. C. ctdi eea as[] .. sa ngonproduct in-grown an as e.g., [1], ways several in icated e rpsdt elz ae 2]admsr[0 at [30] maser and [29] laser a realize to proposed een h aefeunya h lcrcrsos.The response. electric the as frequency same the t eto hsdaodwt h rnia xso the of axis principal the with diamond this on dent e unu ytm,eg uecnutn circuits superconducting e.g. systems, quantum her yeblcmtmtra,i hc w principal two which in metamaterial, hyperbolic c rik h w oso ed,ie,NV i.e., fields, hotspot two the erlinks o losfrtecntuto fasu- a of construction the for allows ion eghiaig hsNV-metamaterial this imaging, length eaini imn ihN centers NV with diamond in relation otadaosis nlgecosmol- analogue acoustics, and port opsdo aac,eg ieO n a and O, site e.g. vacancy, a of composed s cfil.Ti unu hyperbolic quantum This field. ic dc oe unu hyperbolic quantum novel a oduce 5 ra neet[–] eaaeil a be can Metamaterials [1–4]. interest broad ,Mcia 80-00 USA 48109-1040, Michigan r, n rnoNori Franco and ny(V etr ndaodaeunder are diamond in centers (NV) ancy ia 109 China 710049, Xi’an ti edi n ieto.Ti process This direction. one in field ctric 13 China 0193, s oraieahproi meta- hyperbolic a realize to ose boratory, China chool ,6 1, Using l usly nsic ly s - 2

(a) (b) x B E E A i r d Si q k k S r O i r e < 0 z x x y e > 0 z z D C kt St

Figure 1. (color online) (a) Four possible orientations of NV centers in diamond [1, 14]: ~rOA = ( 1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOB = − − − (1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOC = (1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOD = ( 1, 1, 1)/√3. d = 154 pm is the length of carbon bond. The angle between any − − − pair of the above four orientations is identically α = 109◦28′. (b) Negative refraction for hyperbolic dispersion with ǫx < 0 and ǫz > 0. The TH mode is incident on the yz interface with electric field E~ i, wavevector ~ki, and Poynting vector S~i. The angle between the normal (x-axis) and the incident field is θ. It is reflected with electric field E~ r, wavevector ~kr, and Poynting vector S~r. The Poynting and wavevector of the transmitted wave are, respectively, S~t and ~kt. substitutional nitrogen atom at one of its four possible neighboring sites, e.g. site A, B, C and D. The electronic ground state is a spin-triplet state with Hamiltonian [1, 55]

2 Hgs=DgsSz + µBggsk BzSz + µBggs⊥ (BxSx + BySy), (1) where D =2.88 GHz is the zero-field splitting of the electronic ground state, µ is the Bohr magneton, ggsk g⊥ = gs B ≃ gs ggs 2 are respectively the components of the g-factor of the electronic ground state, B~ is the magnetic field, and Sα (α =≃x,y,z) are the spin-1 operators for the electron spin. At room temperature, when there is no electric and strain fields, the Hamiltonian of the electronic excited state is simplified as [1, 55]

2 RT 2 2 H = Dk S + µ g B~ S~ + ξ(S S ), (2) es es z B es · y − x

RT where Desk = 1.42 GHz is the zero-field splitting of the electronic excited state, ges 2.01 is the g-factor of the electronic spin of the excited state at room temperature, ξ = 70 MHz is the strain-related≃ coupling. As illustrated in Fig. 1(a), there are four possible orientations for the NV centers in diamond [1, 14, 25, 26, 28, 55]. Since both Hamiltonians of the ground and excited states are obviously dependent on the relative orientation of the symmetry axis with respect to the magnetic field, the energy spectra and thus the electromagnetic response of the NV centers to the applied fields are different for the four possible orientations. Selection Rules of Optical Transitions.––According to Refs. [10, 12], there are four outer electrons distributed in 2 2 the a1, ex and ey levels, i.e. a1e . On account of the spin degree of freedom, the electronic ground states are the c c c triplet states labeled as [55] ΦA2;1,0 , ΦA2;1,1 , ΦA2;1, 1 , where the superscript c means configuration, the subscripts | i | i | − i are ordered as j, k; S,ms with j being irreducible representation, k being row of irreducible representation, S being total spin and ms being spin projection along the symmetry axis of the NV center. The six first-excited states, i.e. 3 c c c c c c c c a1e , are [55] ΦE,x;1,0 , ΦE,y;1,0 , ΦE,x;1,1 , ΦE,y;1,1 , ΦE,x;1, 1 , ΦE,y;1, 1 , where ΦE,x;S,ms and ΦE,y;S,ms are degenerate under| a magnetici | field.i | By comparingi | thei ground| an−di excited| states,− i there| is one electroni transiting| fromi the a1 orbital to the e orbital. Without spin-orbit coupling, due to conservation of spin and total angular momentum [11], the non-zero transition matrix elements of the position vector ~r = xeˆx + yeˆy + zeˆz are in the following transitions α′ c c Φ ⇋ Φ [12, 55], where α, α′ = x, y and α = α′. | A2;S,ms i | E,α;S,ms i 6 1 g c For the ground states, they can be formally diagonalized as gi = j= 1 Ci,j ΦA2;1,j (i =1, 2, 3) with eigenenergies g | i − | i Ei . And for the excited states, they can be formally diagonalized in two subsets according to their polarizations as x 1 e c y 1 e c P e ei = j= 1 Ci,j ΦE,x;1,j and ei = j= 1 Ci,j ΦE,y;1,j (i =1, 2, 3) with degenerate eigenenergies Ei , where they share| i the same− coefficients| i due to| thei degeneracy.− | i P P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ According to Refs. [4, 13], the constitutive relation reads D = ǫ0←→ǫr E = ǫDǫ0E + P , where D is the electric displacement, ǫ0 is the electric permittivity of vacuum, ←→ǫr and ǫD are, respectively, the relative permittivity tensor of diamond with and without NV centers. The polarization density can be calculated using linear response theory [2, 9] 3

B z =0 G n B 0.5 0 =0.5 ppm z =514 G n =0.5 ppm r 0

B z =1025 G B z =0 G n =0.5 ppm -0.5 0 n 0 =16 ppm

3 -1 -10 -51,2 0 5 10 (GHz)

Figure 2. (color online) The frequency dependence of the electric permittivity ←→ǫr of diamond with NV centers for different values of the magnetic field B and density of NV centers n0: blue dashed line for Bz = 0 G and n0 = 0.5 ppm, green solid line for Bz = 514 G and n0 = 0.5 ppm, red dash-dotted line for Bz = 1025 G and n0 = 0.5 ppm, black dotted line for Bz = 0 G 1 5 and n0 = 16 ppm. Other parameters are dx = dy = 11 D [16], γ− = 10 ns [17], ǫD = 5.7 [5], and µD = 1 2.1 10− [18], − × Bx = By = 0 G. The thin black line ǫr = 0 is just a guide to the eye. as ~(j) ~(j) ~ n0 dif (dfi E) P~ = Re ρi · , (3) − ~ ω ∆(j) + iγ j,i,fX − fi ~ 1 where is the Planck constant, n0 = v0− is the density of the NV centers, ρi is the probability of the initial state i, ω ~ (j) is the frequency of the electric field E, ∆fi is the transition frequency of the jth NV center between the initial state 1 ~(j) i and the final state f, γ− is the lifetime of the final state f, and dif is the transition matrix element of the electric dipole of the jth NV center between the initial and final states. Note that i = f in Eq. (3), and also in Eq. (S83). In 6 x y the above equation, we did not explicitly discriminate the contributions from ei and ei , as they only differ by the polarization direction. | i | i The relative permittivity tensor is [55]

g e e g Ci,j∗1 (j)Cf,j1 (j)Cf,j∗ 2 (j)Ci,j2 (j) ←→ǫr =ǫD Re − ~ e g 1 2 3 ǫ0v0 ω [E (j) E (j)] + iγ j,i,f,jX,j − f − i (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(jn)), o (4) × x y x y (j) (j) where d~x and d~y are the components of the transition dipole of the jth NV center. Clearly, there can be nine possible (j) e g negative permittivity components around the nine transition frequencies ∆fi = Ei (j) Ef (j) of the jth NV center. However, if a static magnetic field is applied along the z-axis, all transition frequencies− would be correspondingly identical for all four possible orientations [14]. Moreover, the relative permeability is not modified by the presence of 3 3 NV centers because the transition A2 ⇋ E can only be induced by the electric-dipole couplings to the electromagnetic field. In Fig. 2 we investigate the dependence of the permittivity on the magnetic field and density of the NV centers. Noticeably, two of the three components of the permittivity remain unchanged and only one component is subtly modified by B~ due to the symmetry and the special choice of B~ ~e [55]. As a special case, we plot the modified k z component of the permittivity ǫr versus the frequency of the incident light for B = 0. When the magnetic field c is absent, in the manifold of the electronic ground state, ΦA2;1, 1 are degenerate and there is an energy gap Dgs c | ± i c between them and ΦA2;1,0 . For the manifold of the electronic excited state, because ΦE,α;1, 1 are degenerate, there would be level| anti-crossingi due to the strain-related coupling ξ. Since the electric-dipole| ± inducedi transitions conserve the spin momentum [11], there could exist negative permittivity around three transition frequencies, i.e. 4

∆ω = Desk D ξ and ∆ω =0 GHz [55]. However, in the blue dashed curve of Fig. 2, we can only observe two 1,2 − gs ± 3 negative dips around the transition frequencies Desk Dgs = 1.46 GHz and 0 GHz. The first two dips merge into a single one as their widths, GHz, are much larger− than their− separation, i.e. 2ξ = 0.14 GHz. As the frequency of the incident light grows, the∼ modified component of the permittivity eventually increases to become positive at ∆ω =2.37 GHz. Therefore, for B =0 and n0 =0.5 ppm, the frequency window for demonstrating negative refraction is roughly (-1.46,2.37) GHz. Because Eq. (S83) suggests negative permittivity to be around the transition frequencies, we hereafter explore the possibility of the negative refraction beyond the above frequency domain by tuning magnetic field. In the green solid curve of Fig. 2, we plot the permittivity at the degenerate point of the excited states, i.e., B = 514 G. A new negative dip appears at ∆ω = 3.11 GHz. Interestingly, for the degenerate point of the ground states, i.e., B = 1025 G, in addition to the other two at ∆ω =2.53 GHz and ∆ω =5.51 GHz on the right, there is a new negative dip at ∆ω = 4.06 GHz on the left hand side of ∆ω , cf. red dash-dotted curve of Fig. 2. Meanwhile, − 1,2 the depth of the main dip at ∆ω1,2 has been reduced as compared to the case when B =0 G. The increasing magnetic field does not only modify the transition frequencies, but also redistributes electric dipoles among the eigenstates. In this regard, by tuning the magnetic field, we can switch on/off the negative refraction on demand. In Fig. 2, there are only seven dips for the cases with B = 514 G and B = 1025 G, because there are two sets of degenerate eigenstates as shown in [55]. Furthermore, suggested by Eq. (S83), the permittivity is also influenced by the density n0 of the NV centers. In the black dotted curve of Fig. 2, this density is increased from n0 =0.5 ppm to n0 = 16 ppm. Compared to the blue dashed curve of Fig. 2, the window of the negative refraction has been significantly broadened because more NV centers can negatively respond to the applied magnetic field. With this increased density, the negative dip at ∆ω = 4.06 GHz can be more profound for B = 1025 G. Notice that in the numerical simulation we have not used the local− field correction [4, 13], since the local field correction will not substantially change the center and width of the negative refraction domain but will modify its magnitude [7–9, 55]. Therefore, we have demonstrated negative refraction by the normalized ǫr in Fig. 2. Negative Refraction.––In Ref. [1], it has been shown that for a double-negative metamaterial there can be negative refraction. However, in the NV centers of diamond, because the electric permittivity tensor possesses two different components, it is natural to ask whether negative refraction can exist. Below, we will demonstrate that negative refraction can indeed occur for a TH incident mode [55], cf. Fig. 1(b). According to Maxwell’s equations [4, 13], E~ = ∂ µ H~ , H~ = ∂ ǫ E~ , where both the current density and ∇× − ∂t D ∇× ∂t ←→ the charge density vanish, ←→ǫ = ǫ0←→ǫr is the permittivity of diamond with NV centers, and µD is the permeability of pure diamond. Assuming that the transmitted electric and magnetic fields are, respectively, E~ (~r, t) = (E eˆ + E eˆ ) exp[i(~k t tx x tz z t · ~r ωt)], H~ (~r, t)= H eˆ exp[i(~k ~r ωt)], we have − t ty y t · − ( ←→I µ ω2 ǫ )E~ =0, (5) ∇×∇× − 0 ←→ t where ←→I is the identity dyadic. For nontrivial solutions, the dispersion relation for the extraordinary mode reads

2 2 2 ǫxktx + ǫzktz = µ0ω ǫxǫz, (6) assuming ky =0. Such a dispersion relation for the extraordinary mode is hyperbolic or indeﬁnite because ǫxǫz < 0. According to the boundary condition [4], the tangential components of the wavevector across the interface should be equal, i.e., ktz = kiz > 0, ktx = kix. By inserting Eq. (S121) into Eq. (S116), we obtain the relation between Etx and Etz as ǫxktxEtx + ǫzktzEtz =0. By Maxwell equation, we have

ωǫzEtz H~ = eˆy exp i ~kt ~r ωt . (7) − ktx · − h i The time-averaged Poynting vector reads [4] S~ = 1 Re(E~ H~ ), with the components being S = ωǫz E2 , S = t 2 t t∗ tx 2ktx tz tz 2 × ǫxωEtx < 0, because ǫ < 0 and ω, k > 0. In order to transmit energy from the interface into the medium, S 2ktz x tz tx should be negative and thus ktx < 0 as ω,ǫz > 0. Together with Eq. (S121), we have

ǫ ǫ k = k z 1 0 sin2 θ , (8) tx − i ǫ − ǫ s 0 x 2 2 where ki = µ0ǫ0ω . Because Stx,Stz < 0, we have proven that for a uniaxial crystal with hyperbolic dispersion, the negative refraction exists for a TH incident ﬁeld. 5

Experimental Feasibility.––For zero magnetic field, the Hamiltonians of the electronic ground and excited states are c c k c c further simplified as Hgs = Dgs mz= 1 ΦA2;1,mz ΦA2;1,mz and Hes α=x,y mz= 1 Des ΦE,α;1,mz ΦE,α;1,mz [55], where we have omitted the strain-related± | coupling.ih | ≃ ± | ih | The transition electric dipoleP has been estimated as 11 D [16]. ForP simplicity,P the orientations of all NV centers are assumed to be along the z-axis. Thus, all matrix elements of the transition electric dipole are c c equal to d~if = Φ d~ Φ = 11(êx +e ˆy) D. Initially, the NV center is in the thermal state ρ(0) = h A2;1,mz | | E,α;1,mz i 1 Φc Φc . Therefore, d~ d~ = 484 (ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ ) D2, and 3 mz = 1 A2;S,ms A2;S,ms i,f if fi 3 x x y y x y y x ± | ih | P P (ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ )E~ P~ = 2ζγǫ Re x x y y x y y x , (9) − 0 ω ∆ + iγ " − fi # 2 242n0 D where ζ = 9~γǫ0 . The three principal components of the relative permittivity are, respectively, 2ζγ(ω ∆ ) ǫ(1) = ǫ − fi , (10) r D − (ω ∆ )2 + γ2 − fi (2) (3) ǫr = ǫr = ǫD. When the frequency of the incident field is ω = ∆fi + γ, one principal component can be negative if c 21 3 n0 >n0 =1.77 10 m− , while the other principal components remain positive. Because two carbon atoms occupy × 10 3 3 a volume v = (1.78 10− ) m− , the minimum density of the NV centers to demonstrate negative refraction is × 1 vnc =5.00 ppb, (11) 2 0 which is feasible in experimental fabrication, e.g. 16 ppm [20]. In addition, as proven in [55], the negative component of permittivity appears in the z-axis, because of B~ ~ez and the symmetry of four possible orientations of the NV centers. k Conclusions.––In this work, we proposed a new approach to realize hyperbolic metamaterial using diamond with NV centers in the optical frequency regime. Because of the long lifetime of the excited states of the NV centers, this hyperbolic metamaterial manifests an intriguing window for negative refraction. By varying the applied magnetic field to tune the energy spectra of both ground and excited states, the frequency of the negative refraction can be tuned in a wide range. Note that it is difficult to fabricate classical metamaterials working in optical-frequency domain, because the sizes of the elements therein are sub-micron. The NV-metamaterials proposed here solve this problem. Because this NV-metamaterial can be used in subwavelength imaging, spontaneous emission enhancement, heat transport and acoustics, analogue cosmology, and lifetime engineering, our proposal bridges the gap between NV centers and metamaterials. We thank stimulating discussion with Zhou Li and K. Y. Bliokh. This work was supported by the MURI Cen- ter for Dynamic Magneto-Optics via the AFOSR Award No. FA9550-14-1-0040, the Japan Society for the Promo- tion of Science (KAKENHI), the IMPACT program of JST, JSPS-RFBR grant No. 17-52-50023, CREST grant No. JPMJCR1676, and RIKEN-AIST Challenge Research Fund. C.P.S. was supported by NSFC under Grant No. 11421063 and No. 11534002, NSAF under Grant No. U1530401. Q.A. was partially supported by NSFC under Grant No. 11505007.

[1] V. G. Veselago, The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ε and µ, Sov. Phys. Uspekhi. 10, 509 (1968). [2] J. B. Pendry, Negative refraction makes a perfect lens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000). [3] D. R. Smith, W. J. Padilla, D. C. Vier, S. C. Nemat-Nasser, and S. Schultz, Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184 (2000). [4] K. Y. Bliokh, Y. P. Bliokh, V. Freilikher, S. Savel’ev, and F. Nori, Colloquium: Unusual resonators: Plasmonics, metamaterials, and random media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1201 (2008). [5] Y. Shen and Q. Ai, Optical properties of drug metabolites in latent ﬁngermarks, Sci. Rep. 6, 20336 (2016). [6] Y. P. Bliokh, V. Freilikher, and F. Nori, Ballistic charge transport in graphene and light propagation in periodic dielectric structures with metamaterials: A comparative study, Phys. Rev. B 87, 245134 (2013). [7] A. V. Kats, S. Savel’ev, V. A. Yampol’skii, and F. Nori, Left-handed interfaces for electromagnetic surface waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 073901 (2007). [8] J. Yao, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Sun, G. Bartal, A. M. Stacy, and X. Zhang, Optical negative refraction in bulk metamaterials of nanowires, Science 321, 930 (2008). 6

[9] Y. N. Fang, Y. Shen, Q. Ai, and C. P. Sun, Negative refraction in Möbius molecules, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043805 (2016). [10] C. W. Chang, M. Liu, S. Nam, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, Optical Möbius symmetry in metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 235501 (2010). [11] Y. Shen, H. Y. Ko, Q. Ai, S. M. Peng, and B. Y. Jin, Molecular split-ring resonators based on metal string complexes, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 3766 (2014). [12] A. L. Rakhmanov, V. A. Yampol’skii, J. A. Fan, F. Capasso, and F. Nori, Layered superconductors as negative-refractive- index metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 81, 075101 (2010). [13] A. Poddubny, I. Iorsh, P. Belov, and Y. Kivshar, Hyperbolic metamaterials, Nat. Photon. 7, 958 (2013). [14] S. Jahani and Z. Jacob, All-dielectric metamaterials, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 23 (2016). [15] D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, Electromagnetic wave propagation in media with indefinite permittivity and permeability tensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003). [16] P. A. Belov, Backward waves and negative refraction in uniaxial dielectrics with negative dielectric permittivity along the anisotropy axis, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 37, 259 (2003). [17] Z. Liu, H. Lee, Y. Xiong, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, Far-field optical hyperlens magnifying sub-diffraction-limited objects, Science 315, 1686 (2007). [18] S. Ishii, A. V. Kildishev, E. Narimanov, V. M. Shalaev, and V. P. Drachev, Sub-wavelength interference pattern from volume plasmon polaritons in a hyperbolic medium, Las. Photon. Rev. 7, 265 (2013). [19] Z. Jacob, I. Smolyaninov, and E. Narimanov, Broadband Purcell effect: radiative decay engineering with metamaterials, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 181105 (2012). [20] S. A. Biehs, M. Tschikin, and P. Ben-Abdallah, Hyperbolic metamaterials as an analog of a blackbody in the near field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 104301 (2012). [21] J. Li, L. Fok, X. Yin, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, Experimental demonstration of an acoustic magnifying hyperlens, Nature Mater. 8, 931 (2009). [22] I. I. Smolyaninov and E. E. Narimanov, Metric signature transitions in optical metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 067402 (2010). [23] H. N. S. Krishnamoorthy, Z. Jacob, E. Narimanov, I. Kretzschmar, and V. M. Menon, Topological transitions in metamaterials, Science 336, 205 (2012). [24] X. Yang, J. Yao, J. Rho, X. Yin, and X. Zhang, Experimental realization of three-dimensional indefinite cavities at the nanoscale with anomalous scaling laws, Nature Photon. 6, 450 (2012). [25] R. Schirhagl, K. Chang, M. Loretz, and C. L. Degen, Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: Nanoscale sensors for physics and biology, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 83 (2014). [26] Y. Wu, F. Jelezko, M. B. Plenio, and T. Weil, Diamond Quantum Devices in Biology, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 55, 6586 (2016). [27] M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond, Phys. Rep. 528, 1 (2013). [28] M. Chen, C. Meng, Q. Zhang, C. Duan, F. Shi, and J. F. Du, Quantum metrology with single spins in diamond under ambient conditions, Natl. Sci. Rev. in press (2017). [29] J. Jeske, D. W. M. Lau, X. Vidal, L. P. McGuinness, P. Reineck, B. C. Johnson, M. W. Doherty, J. C. McCallum, S. Onoda, F. Jelezko, T. Ohshima, T. Volz, J. H. Cole, B. C. Gibson, and A. D. Greentree, Stimulated emission from nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nature Commun. 8, 14000 (2017). [30] L. Jin, M. Pfender, N. Aslam, P. Neumann, S. Yang, J. Wrachtrup, and R.-B. Liu, Proposal for a room-temperature diamond maser, Nature Commun. 6, 8251 (2015). [31] M. P. Ledbetter, K. Jensen, R. Fischer, A. Jarmola, and D. Budker, Gyroscopes based on nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052116 (2012). [32] B. B. Zhou, A. Baksic, H. Ribeiro, C. G. Yale, F. J. Heremans, P. C. Jerger, A. Auer, G. Burkard, A. A. Clerk, and D. D. Awschalom, Accelerated quantum control using superadiabatic dynamics in a solid-state lambda system, Nat. Phys. 13, 330 (2017). [33] X. K. Song, Q. Ai, J. Qiu, and F. G. Deng, Physically feasible three-level transitionless quantum driving with multiple Schrödinger dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 93, 052324 (2016). [34] F. Dolde, H. Fedder, M. W. Doherty, T. Nobauer, F. Rempp, G. Balasubramanian, T. Wolf, F. Reinhard, L. C. L. Hollenberg, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins, Nat. Phys. 7, 459 (2011). [35] F. Dolde, M. W. Doherty, J. Michl, I. Jakobi, B. Naydenov, S. Pezzagna, J. Meijer, P. Neumann, F. Jelezko, N. B. Manson, and J. Wrachtrup, Nanoscale Detection of a Single Fundamental Charge in Ambient Conditions Using the NV− Center in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 097603 (2014). [36] J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature (London) 455, 644 (2008). [37] G. Balasubramanian, I. Y. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al-Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hemmer, A. Krueger, T. Hanke, A. Leitenstorfer, R. Bratschitsch, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions, Nature (London) 455, 648 (2008). [38] L. S. Li, H. H. Li, L. L. Zhou, Z. S. Yang, and Q. Ai, Measurement of weak static magnetic fields with nitrogen-vacancy color center, Acta. Phys. Sin. 66, 230601 (2017). [39] N. Zhao, J.-L. Hu, S.-W. Ho, T.-K. Wen, and R. B. Liu, Atomic-scale magnetometry of distant nuclear spin clusters via nitrogen-vacancy spin in diamond, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 242 (2011). 7

[40] M. S. Grinolds, S. Hong, P. Maletinsky, L. Luan, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and A. Yacoby, Nanoscale magnetic imaging of a single electron spin under ambient conditions, Nat. Phys. 9, 215 (2013). [41] A. Cooper, E. Magesan, H. Yum, and P. Cappellaro, Time-resolved magnetic sensing with electronic spins in diamond, Nat. Commun. 5, 3141 (2014). [42] F. Shi, Q. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Sun, J. Wang, X. Rong, M. Chen, C. Ju, F. Reinhard, H. Chen, J. Wrachtrup, J. Wang, and J. F. Du, Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions, Science 347, 1135 (2015). [43] S. J. DeVience, L. M. Pham, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, N. Bar-Gill, C. Belthangady, F. Casola, M. Corbett, H. Zhang, M. Lukin, H. Park, A. Yacoby, and R. L. Walsworth, Nanoscale NMR spectroscopy and imaging of multiple nuclear species, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 129 (2015). [44] J. M. Boss, K. Chang, J. Armijo, K. Cujia, T. Rosskopf, J. R. Maze, and C. L. Degen, One- and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with a diamond quantum sensor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 197601 (2016). [45] H. B. Liu, M. B. Plenio, and J.-M. Cai, Scheme for detection of single-molecule radical pair reaction using spin in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 200402 (2017). [46] Y.-Y. Wang, J. Qiu, Y.-Q. Chu, M. Zhang, J.-M. Cai, Q. Ai, and F.-G. Deng, Dark state polarizing a nuclear spin in the vicinity of a nitrogen-vacancy center, arXiv:1708.05467 (2017). [47] G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, N. Y. Yao, M. Kubo, H. J. Noh, P. K. Lo, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell, Nature (London) 500, 54 (2013). [48] D. M. Toyli, C. F. de las Casas, D. J. Christle, V. V. Dobrovitski, and D. D. Awschalom, Fluorescence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of single spins in diamond, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 8417 (2013). [49] P. Neumann, I. Jakobi, F. Dolde, C. Burk, R. Reuter, G. Waldherr, J. Honert, T. Wolf, A. Brunner, J. H. Shim, D. Suter, H. Sumiya, J. Isoya, and J. Wrachtrup, High-precision nanoscale temperature sensing using single defects in diamond, Nano Lett. 13, 2738 (2013). [50] Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013). [51] Z.-L. Xiang, X.-Y. Lü, T.-F. Li, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuit consisting of a superconducting flux qubit coupled to a spin ensemble and a transmission-line resonator, Phys. Rev. B 87, 144516 (2013). [52] X.-Y. Lü, Z.-L. Xiang, W. Cui, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Quantum memory using a hybrid circuit with flux qubits and nitrogen-vacancy centers, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012329 (2013). [53] P.-B. Li, Z.-L. Xiang, P. Rabl, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum device with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond coupled to carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 015502 (2016). [54] A. M. Zagoskin, J. R. Johansson, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum information processing using frequency control of impurity spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 76, 014122 (2007). [55] See Supplemental material for details of calculation, which includes Refs. [1, 2, 4, 5, 7–20]. [56] L. J. Zou, D. Marcos, S. Diehl, S. Putz, J. Schmiedmayer, J. Majer, and P. Rabl, Implementation of the Dicke lattice model in hybrid quantum system arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023603 (2014). [57] J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993). [58] M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond: the electronic solution, New J. Phys. 13, 025019 (2011). [59] J. R. Maze, A. Gali, E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. Trifonov, E. Kaxiras, and M. D. Lukin, Properties of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: the group theoretic approach, New J. Phys. 13, 025025 (2011). [60] E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. S. Trifonov, L. Jiang, J. Maze, L. Childress, M. V. G. Dutt, A. S. Sørensen, P. R. Hemmer, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit, Nature (London) 466, 730 (2010). [61] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics 3rd ed., (John Wiley, United States, 1999). [62] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media 2nd Ed., (Butterworth Heinmann, Oxford, 1995). [63] R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics II Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1985). [64] J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, Tunable negative refraction without absorption via electro- magnetically induced chirality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 073602 (2007). [65] J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, and G. Juzeli¯unas, Local-field effects in magnetodielectric media: Negative refraction and absorption reduction, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062509 (2007). [66] A. Lenef, S. W. Brown, D. A. Redman, and S. C. Rand, Electronic structure of the N-V center in diamond: Experiments, Phys. Rev. B 53, 13427 (1996). [67] V. M. Acosta, Optical magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2011. [68] J. Fontanella, R. L. Johnston, J. H. Colwell, and C. Andeen, Temperature and pressure variation of the refractive index of diamond, Appl. Opt. 16, 2949 (1977). [69] H. D. Young, University Physics 7th Ed., (Addison Wesley, San Francisco, 1992). [70] A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker, Temperature- and magnetic-field-dependent longi- tudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197601 (2012). S1

SI. MODEL

The Hamiltonian of an NV center in its electronic ground state is [S1]

2 1 2 1 H = D S S(S + 1) + Ak S I + A⊥ (S I + S I )+ P I I(I + 1) gs gs z − 3 gs z z gs x x y y gs z − 3 +µ gk B S + µ g⊥ (B S + B S )+ µ g B~ I~ B gs z z B gs x x y y N N · 2 1 2 2 +dk (E + δ ) S S(S + 1) + d⊥ (E + δ )(S S )+ d⊥ (E + δ )(S S + S S ). (S1) gs z z z − 3 gs x x y − x gs y y x y y x

Here, Dgs =2.88 GHz is the zero-field splitting of the electronic ground state; Agsk and Ags⊥ are the axial and non-axial components of hyperfine interaction tensor of the electronic ground state; Ix, Iy, Iz are the spin operators of the nuclear spin; Pgs is the nuclear electric quadruple parameter of the electronic ground state; µB and µN are the Bohr magneton and nuclear magneton respectively; ggsk g⊥ = g 2 and g are respectively the g-factors of electronic ≃ gs gs ≃ N 5 7 ground state and nuclear spin; dgsk =3.377 10− D and d⊥ =6.9525 10− D are the components of electric dipole × gs × moment of the electronic ground state; E~ , B~ , and ~δ are the electric, magnetic and strain fields respectively. The electron spin operators in the basis { + , 0 , } are | i | i |−i 0 1 0 1 S = 1 0 1 , (S2) x √ 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 i S = 1− 0 1 , (S3) y √ 2 01− 0  10 0  Sz = 00 0 . (S4) 0 0 1 −   When there is no nuclear spin, electric and strain fields, the Hamiltonian of the electronic ground state is simplified as

2 Hgs = DgsSz + µBggsk BzSz + µB ggs⊥ (BxSx + BySy) D + µ g B 1 µ g (B iB ) 0 gs B gs z √2 B gs x y 1 − 1 = µBggs(Bx + iBy) 0 µBggs(Bx iBy) . (S5)  √2 √2 −  1 0 µBggs(Bx + iBy) Dgs µBggsk Bz  √2 −    At room temperature, the Hamiltonian of an NV center in the electronic excited state is [S1]

2 1 2 1 H = Dk S S(S + 1) + Ak S I + A⊥ (S I + S I )+ P I I(I + 1) es es z − 3 es z z es x x y y es z − 3 RT 2 1 2 2 +µ g B~ S~ + dk (E + δ ) S S(S + 1) + ξ(S S ), (S6) B es · es z z z − 3 y − x where Desk = 1.42 GHz is the zero-field splitting of the electronic excited state; Aesk and Aes⊥ are the axial and non- axial components of hyperfine interaction tensor of the electronic excited state; Pes is the nuclear electric quadruple parameter of the electronic excited state; gRT 2.01 is the g-factor of electronic spin of excited state at the room es ≃ temperature; desk = 1.192 D is the electric dipole moment of the excited state; ξ = 70 MHz is the strain-related coupling. When there is no nuclear spin, electric and strain fields, the Hamiltonian of the electronic excited state is simplified as

2 RT 2 2 H = Dk S + µ g B~ S~ + ξ(S S ) es es z B es · y − x 1 Dk + µ gRTB µ gRT(B iB ) ξ es B es z √2 B es x y 1 RT − 1 RT− = µBg (Bx + iBy) 0 µBg (Bx iBy) . (S7)  √2 es √2 es −  1 RT RT ξ µ g (B + iB ) Desk µ g B  − √2 B es x y − B es z    S2

SII. LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY

In order to simulate the electromagnetic response of the diamond with NV centers in the presence of applied ﬁelds, we can employ the linear-response theory [S2] to calculate the electric permittivity and magnetic permeability. When there is an electric ﬁeld applied, the NV center is polarized as

dω iωt d~ = S(ω)E~ (ω)e− , (S8) h i 2π Z where the Fourier transform of the time-dependent electric ﬁeld with amplitude E~ 0 and frequency ω

E~ (t)= E~ 0 cos ωt (S9) is

∞ E~ (ω)= dt E~ (t)eiωt, (S10) Z−∞ S(ω)= J(ω) J ∗( ω). (S11) − − − Here, J(ω) is the dipole-dipole correlation function,

∞ J(ω)= i dt Tr[d~(t)dρ~ ]eiωt, (S12) − 0 Z0 where the initial state of the NV center is ρ = ρ k k (S13) 0 i| iih i| i X with i ρi =1. The electric dipole in the Heisenberg picture is P d~(t) = exp(iH†t/~)d~exp( iHt/~), (S14) − where H = H e e + H g g , (S15) es ⊗ | ih | gs ⊗ | ih | with g ( e ) being the electronic ground (excited) state. Because the Fourier transform of the electric ﬁeld is | i | i ∞ E~ (ω )= dt E~ cos ωteiω1t = πE~ [δ(ω + ω)+ δ(ω ω)], (S16) 1 0 0 1 1 − Z−∞ the electric dipole of the NV center in the applied electric ﬁeld is

dω1 iω1t iωt d~ = S(ω )e− πE~ [δ(ω + ω)+ δ(ω ω)] = E~ Re [J(ω)+ J ∗( ω)] e− , (S17) h i 2π 1 0 1 1 − − 0 { − } Z where ∞ J(ω)= i dt eiωt ρ k d~(t)d~ k − ih i| | ii 0 i Z X ∞ iωt iH†t/~ iHt/~ = i dt e ρ k e de~ − d~ k − ih i| | ii 0 i Z X ∞ iωt iH†t/~ iHt/~ = i dt e ρi ki e k1 k1 d~ k2 k2 e− k3 k3 d~ ki − 0 h | | i h | | i h | | i h | | i Z i,k1X,k2,k3 † ~ ∞ iωt i H Hk t/ ki − f ~ ~ = i dt e ρie dki,kf dkf ,ki − 0 Z Xi,f ∞ i ω ∆ +iγ t ( kf ki ) ~ ~ = i dt ρie − dki,kf dkf ,ki − 0 Z Xi,f ~ ~ dki,kf dkf ,ki = ρi , (S18) ω ∆kf ki + iγ Xi,f − S3 where in the sum the final state should be different from the initial state, i.e., i = f, 6 i H = k H k = E γ (S19) ki h i| | ii ki − 2 with iγ/2 being phenomenologically introduced for the decay of the excited state. Here, ∆ = E E is the − kf ki kf − ki transition energy between the initial state ki and the final state kf . Therefore, the induced electric dipole can be rewritten as | i | i

~ ~ ~ ~ dki,kf dkf ,ki dki,kf dkf ,ki iωt d~ = E~0 Re ρi e− . (S20) h i −  " (ω ∆kf ki + iγ) − (ω + ∆kf ki + iγ)#  kXi,kf −  Because of the rotating-wave approximation [S3], the second term of the above equation should be neglected, i.e.

~ ~ ρidki,kf dkf ,ki iωt d~ E~0 Re e− . (S21) h i≈−  ω ∆kf ki + iγ  kXi,kf −   Assuming that all NV centers are identical, the polarization density reads n P~ = 0 d~ , (S22) ~ h i where n0 is the number density of the NV centers in diamond.

SIII. LORENTZ LOCAL FIELD THEORY

According to Ref. [S4], in closely-packed molecules the polarization of neighboring molecules gives rise to an internal field E~i at any molecule, in addition to the external field E~ . The internal field is

E~ = E~ E~ , (S23) i near − mean where E~near is the actual contribution from the molecules close to the given molecule, and E~mean is the contribution from those molecules treated in an average continuum. As proven in Ref. [S4], in any crystal structure E~near =0 due to symmetry, and thus E~i = E~mean. By dipole approximation and− assuming no net charge in the volume V , the mean-ﬁeld contribution is [S4] 1 E~mean = (ǫD 1)E~ ~pl, (S24) − − − 3Vǫ0 Xl where ǫD = 5.7 [S5] is relative permittivity of diamond, and the second term is summed over all induced molecular electric dipole moments ~pl within the volume. Under the weak ﬁeld approximation, the induced dipole moment is

~pl = ǫ0γmol(E~ + E~i), (S25) where γ is generally a second-order tensor. Since E~ = (ǫ 1)E~ +P/~ (3ǫ ) [S4, S6], the polarization P~ ~p /V = mol i D − 0 ≡ l l n0~pl reads P P~ P~ = n0ǫ0γmol(E~ + E~i)= n0ǫ0γmol(ǫDE~ + ). (S26) 3ǫ0

Furthermore, using P~ = ǫ0χeE~ [S4, S6], we have χ ǫ χ E~ = n ǫ γ (ǫ + e )E,~ (S27) 0 e 0 0 mol D 3 leading to

n0γmolǫD χe = . (S28) 1 1 n γ − 3 0 mol S4

As proven in Sec. SVII, in diamond with NV centers, γmol is of the form

η(ω)/n0 0 0 γmol = 0 00 , (S29)  0 00   where η(ω) is the second part of Eq. (11) in the main text. Therefore, the electric susceptibility is

3ǫD η 3 η 0 0 − χe = 0 00 , (S30)   0 00   and the relative permittivity is

3η ǫD(1 + 3 η )0 0 − ǫr = 0 ǫ 0 . (S31) −→  D  0 0 ǫD   The window of the negative refraction is determined by the two solutions to the equation 3η 3 1+ =0, or equivalently, + η =0, (S32) 3 η 2 − which is not qualitatively diﬀerent from the equation for the case without the local ﬁeld correction

ǫD + η =0. (S33)

As a result, both the center and width of the negative refraction domain are not substantially modiﬁed by the Lorentz local ﬁeld correction. This is in consistent with the numerical results in Refs. [S7–S9].

SIV. SELECTION RULES OF OPTICAL TRANSITIONS

2 2 According to Ref. [S10], there are four outer electrons distributed in the a1, ex and ey levels, i.e., a1e . On account of the spin degree of freedom, the electronic ground states can be written in the second quantization form, a1a¯1exe¯xeye¯y with an overbar denoting spin-down, as | i 1 Φc = ( 111001 + 110110 ), (S34) | A2;1,0i √2 | i | i Φc = 111010 , (S35) | A2;1,1i | i c ΦA2;1, 1 = 110101 , (S36) | − i | i where the superscript c means conﬁguration, the subscripts are ordered as j, k; S,ms with j being the irreducible representation, k being the row of irreducible representation, S being the total spin and ms being the spin projection 3 along the symmetry axis of the NV. The six ﬁrst excited states, i.e., a1e , are respectively 1 Φc = ( 100111 + 011011 ), (S37) | E,x;1,0i √2 | i | i 1 Φc = ( 101101 + 011110 ), (S38) | E,y;1,0i √2 | i | i Φc = 101011 , (S39) | E,x;1,1i | i Φc = 101110 , (S40) | E,y;1,1i | i c ΦE,x;1, 1 = 010111 , (S41) | − i | i c ΦE,y;1, 1 = 011101 . (S42) | − i | i

By comparing the above states, we notice that there is one electron transiting from the a1 orbital to the e orbital. In the absence of spin-orbital coupling, on account of conservation of spin and total angular momentum [S11], the S5 following transitions are allowed by the electric dipole coupling

Φc ⇋ Φc , Φc , (S43) | A2;1,0i | E,x;1,0i | E,y;1,0i Φc ⇋ Φc , Φc , (S44) | A2;1,1i | E,x;1,1i | E,y;1,1i c ⇋ c c ΦA2;1, 1 ΦE,x;1, 1 , ΦE,y;1, 1 . (S45) | − i | − i | − i

The non-zero transition matrix elements of the position vector ~r = xeˆx + yeˆy + zeˆz (eˆi unit vector along direction i = x,y,z) are listed as [S12]

1 1 Φc x Φc = ( 111001 + 110110 )x ( 100111 + 011011 ) h A2;1,0| | E,x;1,0i √2 h | h | √2 | i | i 1 1 = a x e + a¯ x e¯ =0, (S49) 2h 1| | yi 2h 1| | yi 1 1 Φc y Φc = ( 111001 + 110110 )y ( 100111 + 011011 ) h A2;1,0| | E,x;1,0i √2 h | h | √2 | i | i 1 1 = a y e + a¯ y e¯ = a y e , (S50) 2h 1| | yi 2h 1| | yi h 1| | yi 1 1 Φc x Φc = ( 111001 + 110110 )x ( 101101 + 011110 ) h A2;1,0| | E,y;1,0i √2 h | h | √2 | i | i 1 1 = a¯ x e¯ + a x e = a x e , (S51) 2h 1| | xi 2h 1| | xi h 1| | xi 1 1 Φc y Φc = ( 111001 + 110110 )y ( 101101 + 011110 ) h A2;1,0| | E,y;1,0i √2 h | h | √2 | i | i 1 1 = a¯ y e¯ + a y e =0, (S52) 2h 1| | xi 2h 1| | xi

Φc x Φc = 111010 x 101011 = a¯ x e¯ =0, (S53) h A2;1,1| | E,x;1,1i h | | i h 1| | yi Φc y Φc = 111010 y 101011 = a¯ y e¯ , (S54) h A2;1,1| | E,x;1,1i h | | i h 1| | yi Φc x Φc = 111010 x 101110 = a¯ x e¯ , (S55) h A2;1,1| | E,y;1,1i h | | i h 1| | xi Φc y Φc = 111010 y 101110 = a¯ y e¯ =0, (S56) h A2;1,1| | E,y;1,1i h | | i h 1| | xi c c ΦA2;1, 1 x ΦE,x;1, 1 = 110101 x 010111 = a1 x ey =0, (S57) h − | | − i h | | i h | | i c c ΦA2;1, 1 y ΦE,x;1, 1 = 110101 y 010111 = a1 y ey , (S58) h − | | − i h | | i h | | i c c ΦA2;1, 1 x ΦE,y;1, 1 = 110101 x 011101 = a1 x ex , (S59) h − | | − i h | | i h | | i c c ΦA2;1, 1 y ΦE,y;1, 1 = 110101 y 011101 = a1 y ex =0. (S60) h − | | − i h | | i h | | i To summarize, the selection rules for optical transitions are

c c ΦA2;1,0 y ΦE,x;1,0 , (S61) | i⇋| i Φc x Φc , (S62) | A2;1,0i⇋| E,y;1,0i c c ΦA2;1,1 y ΦE,x;1,1 , (S63) | i⇋| i Φc x Φc , (S64) | A2;1,1i⇋| E,y;1,1i c c ΦA2;1, 1 y ΦE,x;1, 1 , (S65) | − i⇋| − i c c ΦA2;1, 1 x ΦE,y;1, 1 , (S66) | − i⇋| − i S6 where the label over the arrow indicates the polarization of the electric ﬁeld. In short,

c c Φ α′ Φ , (S67) | A2;S,ms i⇋| E,α;S,ms i

c c where α, α′ = x, y and α = α′. In addition, ΦE,x;S,ms and ΦE,y;S,ms remain degenerate when applying a magnetic ﬁeld. 6 | i | i For the electronic ground states, they can be formally diagonalized as

1 g c g c g c g c gi = Ci,j ΦA2;1,j = Ci,0 ΦA2;1,0 + Ci,1 ΦA2;1,1 + Ci, 1 ΦA2;1, 1 , (S68) | i | i | i | i − | − i j= 1 X−

g with eigenenergies Ei . For the electronic excited state, they can be likewise diagonalized in two sets according to their polarizations as

1 x e c e c e c e c ei = Ci,j ΦE,x;1,j = Ci,0 ΦE,x;1,0 + Ci,1 ΦE,x;1,1 + Ci, 1 ΦE,x;1, 1 , (S69) | i | i | i | i − | − i j= 1 X− 1 y e c e c e c e c ei = Ci,j ΦE,y;1,j = Ci,0 ΦE,y;1,0 + Ci,1 ΦE,y;1,1 + Ci, 1 ΦE,y;1, 1 , (S70) | i | i | i | i − | − i j= 1 X−

e with eigenenergies Ei , where they share the same coeﬃcients due to the degeneracy. According to Refs. [S4, S13], the constitutive relation reads

~ ~ ~ ~ D = ǫ0←→ǫr E = ǫDǫ0E + P, (S71)

~ where ǫ0 is the permittivity of the vacuum, ←→ǫr is the relative permittivity of diamond with NV centers, E is the applied electric ﬁeld, ǫD is the relative permittivity of pure diamond, and the polarization density can be calculated by linear response theory [S2] as

~(j) ~(j) ~ n0 dif (dfi E) P~ = Re ρi · − ~  ω ∆(j) + iγ  j,i,fX − fi  ~(j) ~(j) ~ ~(j) ~(j) ~ ~(j) ~(j) ~ n dg1e1 (de1 g1 E) dg1e2 (de2g1 E) dg1e3 (de3g1 E) = 0 Re · + · + · 3~ (j) (j) (j) − " ω ∆e1g1 + iγ ω ∆e2g1 + iγ ω ∆e3g1 + iγ − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ ~(j) ~(j) ~ ~(j) ~(j) ~ dg2e1 (de1 g2 E) dg2e2 (de2 g2 E) dg2e3 (de3 g2 E) + (j) · + (j) · + (j) · ω ∆e1g2 + iγ ω ∆e2g2 + iγ ω ∆e3g2 + iγ − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ ~(j) ~(j) ~ ~(j) ~(j) ~ dg3e1 (de1 g3 E) dg3e2 (de2 g3 E) dg3e3 (de3 g3 E) + (j) · + (j) · + (j) · . (S72) ω ∆e1g3 + iγ ω ∆e2g3 + iγ ω ∆e3g3 + iγ # − − −

~(j) ~(j) Here, dif = i d f is the matrix element of electric dipole of jth NV center between the initial state i and final (jh) | | i | i state f ; ∆fi is the transition energy between the initial state i and the final state f of jth NV center; and γ is the | i | i | i 1 decay rate of the electronic excited state. The summation j is over all NV centers within the volume v0 = n0− , and ω is the frequency of the incident light. In the above equation, we did not explicitly discriminate the contributions from ex and ey as they only differ by the polarization direction.P | i i | i i S7

For the transition Eg(j) Ee(j), note that 1 ↔ 1 ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g c ~(j) c c ~(j) c ~ dg1e1 (de1 g1 E) 1 2 3 4 C1,j∗ 1 C1,j2 C1,j∗ 3 C1,j4 ΦA2;1,j1 d ΦE;1,j2 ( ΦE;1,j3 d ΦA2;1,j4 E) · = j ,j ,j ,j h | | i h | | i · (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω ∆e1g1 + iγ P 1 1 − − − g e e g c (j) c c (j) c C ∗ C C ∗ C Φ d~ Φ ( Φ d~ Φ E~ ) j1,j3 1,j1 1,j1 1,j3 1,j3 h A2;1,j1 | | E;1,j1 i h E;1,j3 | | A2;1,j3 i · = e g P ω [E1 (j) E1 (j)] + iγ g e e g − − C ∗ C C ∗ C = j1,j2 1,j1 1,j1 1,j2 1,j2 (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S73) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · P − 1 − 1 ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg1e2 (de2 g1 E) 1 2 C1,j∗ 1 C2,j1 C2,j∗ 2 C1,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S74) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e2g1 + iγ P 2 1 − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg1e3 (de3 g1 E) 1 2 C1,j∗ 1 C3,j1 C3,j∗ 2 C1,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S75) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e3g1 + iγ P 3 1 − − −

~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg2e1 (de1g2 E) 1 2 C2,j∗ 1 C1,j1 C1,j∗ 2 C2,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S76) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e1g2 + iγ P 1 2 − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg2e2 (de2g2 E) 1 2 C2,j∗ 1 C2,j1 C2,j∗ 2 C2,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S77) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e2g2 + iγ P 2 2 − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg2e3 (de3g2 E) 1 2 C2,j∗ 1 C3,j1 C3,j∗ 2 C2,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S78) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e3g2 + iγ P 3 2 − − −

~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg3e1 (de1g3 E) 1 2 C3,j∗ 1 C1,j1 C1,j∗ 2 C3,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S79) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e1g3 + iγ P 1 3 − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg3e2 (de2g3 E) 1 2 C3,j∗ 1 C2,j1 C2,j∗ 2 C3,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E,~ (S80) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e2g3 + iγ P 2 3 − − − ~(j) ~(j) ~ g e e g dg3e3 (de3g3 E) 1 2 C3,j∗ 1 C3,j1 C3,j∗ 2 C3,j2 · = j ,j (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E.~ (S81) (j) ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ x y x y · ω ∆e3g3 + iγ P 3 3 − − − Therefore, the induced dielectric polarization density can be written as

g e e g g e e g g e e g n C ∗ 1 C 1 C ∗ 2 C 2 C ∗ 1 C 1 C ∗ 2 C 2 C ∗ 1 C 1 C ∗ 2 C 2 P~ = 0 Re j1,j2 1,j 1,j 1,j 1,j + j1,j2 1,j 2,j 2,j 1,j + j1,j2 1,j 3,j 3,j 1,j −3~ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ (P − 1 − 1 P − 2 − 1 P − 3 − 1 g e e g g e e g g e e g C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C + j1,j2 2,j1 1,j1 1,j2 2,j2 + j1,j2 2,j1 2,j1 2,j2 2,j2 + j1,j2 2,j1 3,j1 3,j2 2,j2 ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ P − 1 − 2 P − 2 − 2 P − 3 − 2 g e e g g e e g g e e g C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C + j1,j2 3,j1 1,j1 1,j2 3,j2 + j1,j2 3,j1 2,j1 2,j2 3,j2 + j1,j2 3,j1 3,j1 3,j2 3,j2 ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ P − 1 − 3 P − 2 − 3 P − 3 − 3 ) (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)) E.~ (S82) × x y x y · As a result, the relative permittivity tensor is

g e e g g e e g g e e g n C ∗ 1 C 1 C ∗ 2 C 2 C ∗ 1 C 1 C ∗ 2 C 2 C ∗ 1 C 1 C ∗ 2 C 2 ǫ (ω)= ǫ 0 Re j1,j2 1,j 1,j 1,j 1,j + j1,j2 1,j 2,j 2,j 1,j + j1,j2 1,j 3,j 3,j 1,j ←→r D − 3~ǫ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ 0 (P − 1 − 1 P − 2 − 1 P − 3 − 1 g e e g g e e g g e e g C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C + j1,j2 2,j1 1,j1 1,j2 2,j2 + j1,j2 2,j1 2,j1 2,j2 2,j2 + j1,j2 2,j1 3,j1 3,j2 2,j2 ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ P − 1 − 2 P − 2 − 2 P − 3 − 2 g e e g g e e g g e e g C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C C ∗ C + j1,j2 3,j1 1,j1 1,j2 3,j2 + j1,j2 3,j1 2,j1 2,j2 3,j2 + j1,j2 3,j1 3,j1 3,j2 3,j2 ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ ω [Ee(j) Eg(j)] + iγ P − 1 − 3 P − 2 − 3 P − 3 − 3 ) (d~(j) + d~(j))(d~(j) + d~(j)). (S83) × x y x y S8

x y a B z A d 2a 1 O a 2

D C

Figure S1. (color online) Four possible orientations of NV centers in diamond [S1, S14]: ~rOA = ( 1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOB = − − − (1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOC = (1, 1, 1)/√3, and ~rOD =( 1, 1, 1)/√3. d = 154 pm is the length of carbon bond. The side length of the − 2 − − cube is a = √3 d. The angle between any pair of the above four orientations is 109◦28′.

(j) e Clearly, there may be nine possible negative permittivities around the nine transition frequencies ∆eigj = Ei (j) g − Ej (j). As shown in Fig. S1, in diamond there are four possible symmetry axes for the NV centers, i.e. ~rOA = ( 1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOB = (1, 1, 1)/√3, ~rOC = (1, 1, 1)/√3, and ~rOD = ( 1, 1, 1)/√3. Here, ~rOA can be obtained by − − − − − − rotating the z-axis around the axis ~nOA = ( 1, 1, 0)/√2 by an angle θOA = (180◦ 109◦28′/2) = 125◦16′, i.e., − − − − T ~rOA = R(~nOA,θOA)ˆez = R(~nOA,θOA)(0, 0, 1) , (S84) where the rotation matrix around ~n = (nx,ny,nz) with an angle θ is [S15] cos θ + n2 (1 cos θ) n n (1 cos θ) n sin θ n n (1 cos θ)+ n sin θ x − x y − − z x z − y R(~n, θ)= n n (1 cos θ)+ n sin θ cos θ + n2(1 cos θ) n n (1 cos θ) n sin θ . (S85) x y − z y − y z − − x n n (1 cos θ) n sin θ n n (1 cos θ)+ n sin θ cos θ + n2(1 cos θ)  x z − − y y z − x z −   And ~rOB can be obtained by rotating the z-axis around the axis ~nOA = ( 1, 1, 0)/√2 by an angle θOA = 125◦16′, i.e., − −

~rOB = R(~nOA, θOA)ˆe . (S86) − z And ~rOC can be obtained by rotating the z-axis around the axis ~nOC = (1, 1, 0)/√2 by an angle θOC = 109◦28′/2= 54◦44′, i.e.,

~rOC = R(~nOC,θOC)ˆez. (S87)

And ~rOD can be obtained by rotating the z-axis around the axis ~nOC = (1, 1, 0)/√2 by an angle θOC = 54◦44′, i.e., − −

~rOD = R(~nOC, θOC)ˆe . (S88) − z

SV. QUANTUM SWITCH OF NEGATIVE REFRACTION AND NORMAL REFRACTION

As implied by Eq. (S83), the permittivity might be negative around the transition frequencies. In order to switch on/off the negative refraction, we analyze the effect of the magnetic field on the transition frequencies. As shown in e g Fig. S2, there are generally nine transition frequencies ∆ij = Ei Ej , which can be subtly tuned by varying the magnetic field. − Below, we analyze the NV center at some specific magnetic fields: (a) When the magnetic field is absent, the Hamiltonians of the electronic ground state and excited state are respectively simplified as H = D Φc Φc , (S89) gs gs | A2;1,ms ih A2;1,ms | ms= 1 X± c c c c c c Hes = [Desk ( ΦE,α;1,+1 ΦE,α;1,+1 + ΦE,α;1, 1 ΦE,α;1, 1 ) ξ ΦE,α;1, 1 ΦE,α;1, 1 + h.c.]. (S90) | ih | | − ih − | − | − ih − | α=x,y X S9

(GHz) 3 ij 0

-5 1,2

-10 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 B (G)

e g Figure S2. The transition frequencies ∆ij = E E versus the magnetic field B. The magnetic field is applied along the i − j z-axis. This figure is identical for all four possible orientations of the NV centers due to the special choice of B~ ~ez. k

The eigenstates of the electronic ground state are

g = Φc , (S91) | 1i | A2;1,0i g = Φc , (S92) | 2i | A2;1,+1i c g3 = ΦA2;1, 1 , (S93) | i | − i with eigenenergies

g E1 =0, (S94) g E2 = Dgs, (S95) g E3 = Dgs. (S96) The eigenstates of the electronic excited state are

eα = Φc , (S97) | 1 i | E,α;S,0i α c c e2 = ( ΦE,α;S,+1 + ΦE,α;S, 1 )/√2, (S98) | i | i | − i α c c e3 = ( ΦE,α;S,+1 ΦE,α;S, 1 )/√2, (S99) | i | i − | − i with eigenenergies

e E1 =0, (S100) e E2 = Desk + ξ, (S101) e E = Dk ξ. (S102) 3 es − Because the spin is conserved, the following optical transitions are allowed

g ⇋ e , (S103) | 1i | 1i g , g ⇋ e , e . (S104) | 2i | 3i | 2i | 3i

These correspond to five peaks around the transition frequencies ∆11, ∆22, ∆23, ∆32, and ∆33. Furthermore, because g2 and g3 are degenerate, ∆22 = ∆23 = Desk Dgs + ξ and ∆32 = ∆33 = Desk Dgs ξ. Since the separations between| i the| i latter four peaks are 2ξ, which is, of− the order of GHz, much smaller− than the− width of the peaks. In Fig. S3, we plot the permittivity for different values of the magnetic field B and density n0 of NV centers. Therefore, we would only observe two dips for B = 0, as shown in Fig. S3(a). Moreover, when the frequency is larger than S10

∆ω = 2.37 GHz, the permittivity becomes positive and thus negative refraction disappears. When the density is increased to n0 = 16 ppm, cf. Fig. S3(d), the two negative dips remains but the windows on the right is signiﬁcantly broadened. (b) When B = 514 G, the electronic excited state is at the avoided crossing point. Correspondingly, the Hamiltonians for the electronic ground and excited states are, respectively, given by

iφ 2Desk Desk e− 0 iφ iφ Hes Dk e 0 Dk e , (S105) ≃  es es −  0 Dk eiφ 0  es   3 1 iφ  2 Dgs 2 Dgse− 0 1 iφ 1 iφ Hgs 2 Dgse 0 2 Dgse− . (S106) ≃  1 iφ 1  0 2 Dgse 2 Dgs Since the couplings are comparable to the detunings, the eigenstates in both manifolds eﬀectively mix all three c α c components, i.e., gj = mz amz ΦA2;1,mz , e3 = mz bmz ΦE,α;S,mz . In this case, we would expect nine possible negative dips at nine| i transition frequencies.| i In| Fig.i S3(b), we observe| 7 dipsi because the degeneracy has been partially broken and there are stillP two sets of degenerate states.P As compared to Fig. S3(a), there is an additional negative dip at ∆ω =3.11 GHz. (c) When B = 1025 G, there are three additional negative dips at ∆ω = 4.06 GHz, ∆ω = 2.53 GHz, and ∆ω =5.51 GHz beyond the domain [ 1.46, 2.37] GHz. − −

SVI. NEGATIVE REFRACTION AT INTERFACE

By numerical simulation, we have shown that one principle component of the permittivity can be negative while the other principle components remain unchanged. In this section, we will analytically prove that negative refraction can occur at the interface for a transverse magnetic (TH) mode, as shown in Fig. S4. According to Maxwell’s equation [S4, S13], ∂ ∂ E~ = B~ = µ H,~ (S107) ∇× −∂t −∂t 0 ∂ ∂ H~ = D~ = ǫ E,~ (S108) ∇× ∂t ∂t←→ D~ =0, (S109) ∇ · B~ =0, (S110) ∇ · ~ where we have assumed J =0 and ρ =0, ←→ǫ is the permittivity of diamond with NV centers, µ0 is the permeability of vacuum and pure diamond. Assuming that the electric and magnetic ﬁelds of the transmitted wave are respectively

E~ (~r, t) = (E eˆ + E eˆ )exp i(~k ~r ωt) , (S111) t tx x tz z t · − h i H~ (~r, t)= H eˆ exp i(~k ~r ωt) , (S112) t ty y t · − h i where ~kt and ω are respectively the wavevector and frequency of the transmitted wave, we have E~ = iωµ H,~ (S113) ∇× 0 H~ = iω ǫ E.~ (S114) ∇× − ←→ By inserting Eq. (S114) into Eq. (S113), we have

E~ = iωµ H~ ∇×∇× 0∇× 2 ~ = ←→ǫ µ0ω E. (S115) This is equivalent to

( ←→I ǫ µ ω2)E~ =0, (S116) ∇×∇× − ←→ 0 S11

(a) 1 (b) 1

0.5 0.5 r r

0 0 =2.37 GHz =3.11 GHz

3 -0.5 -0.5

1,2 1,2 3 -1 -1 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 (GHz) (GHz)

0.5 0.5 r r

0 0 =5.51 GHz =-4.06 GHz =2.53 GHz

-0.5 -0.5 3

1,2 3 -1 -1 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -51,2 0 5 10 (GHz) (GHz)

Figure S3. (color online) The frequency dependence of the electric permittivity ←→ǫr of diamond with NV centers for diﬀerent values of the magnetic ﬁeld B and density of NV centers n0: (a) Bz = 0 G and n0 = 0.5 ppm, (b) Bz = 514 G and n0 = 0.5 ppm, 1 (c) Bz = 1025 G and n0 = 0.5 ppm, (d) Bz = 0 G and n0 = 16 ppm. Other parameters are dx = dy = 11 D [S16], γ− = 10 ns 5 [S17], ǫD = 5.7 [S5], and µD = 1 2.1 10− [S18], Bx = By = 0 G. The thin black line ǫr = 0 is just a guide to the eye. − × x

Ei Er S i q kr ki Sr e < 0 z e x > 0 z

kt St

Figure S4. (color online) Negative refraction for hyperbolic dispersion with ǫx < 0 and ǫz > 0. The TH mode is incident on the interface with electric field E~ i, wavevector ~ki, Poynting vector S~i, and angle θ. It is reflected with electric field E~ r, wavevector ~kr, and Poynting vector S~r. The Poynting vector, wavevector, electric and magnetic fields of the transmitted wave are respectively S~t, ~kt, E~ t, and H~ t. S12 where ←→I is the identity dyadic. For nontrivial solutions, the determinant of the dyadic should be zero, i.e.

2 2 2 µ0ǫxω ky kz kxky kxkz − − 2 2 2 det kxky µ0ǫyω kx kz kykz =0, (S117)  k k k−k − µ ǫ ω2 k2 k2  x z y z 0 z − x − y   or equivalently

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 µ0ω kx ky (ǫx + ǫy)+ kz (ǫx + ǫz) µω ǫx (ǫy + ǫz) + ǫz kz µω ǫy + kyǫy ky + kz µω ǫx + kxǫx =0, − − − (S118) where

ǫx 0 0 ǫ = 0 ǫ 0 . (S119) ←→  y  0 0 ǫz   The dispersion relations for the ordinary and extraordinary modes are respectively

k2 + k2 µ ω2ǫ =0, (S120) x z − 0 y ǫ k2 + ǫ k2 µ ω2ǫ ǫ =0, (S121) x x z z − 0 x z where we have assumed ky =0. According to the boundary condition [S19], the tangential components of the wavevector across the interface should be equal, i.e.

ktz = kiz > 0, (S122)

kty = kiy. (S123)

By inserting Eq. (S121) into Eq. (S116), we obtain the relation between Etx and Etz as

ǫxktxEtx + ǫzktzEtz =0. (S124)

Using Eq. (S113), we have

E~ H~ = ∇× t iωµ0 ~k E~ = t × t ωµ0

ktzEtx ktxEtz i(~kt ~r ωt) = − eˆye · − ωµ0

1 ǫzktzEtz i(~kt ~r ωt) = k k E eˆ e · − ωµ − tz ǫ k − tx tz y 0 x tx 2 2 Etz ǫzktz + ǫxktx i(~kt ~r ωt) = eˆ e · − ωµ − ǫ k y 0 x tx 2 Etz µ0ω ǫxǫz i(~kt ~r ωt) = eˆy e · − −ωµ0 ǫxktx

ωǫzEtz i(~kt ~r ωt) = eˆy e · − . (S125) − ktx

The time-averaged Poynting vector of the transmitted wave reads

1 S~ = Re(E~ H~ ∗), (S126) t 2 t × t S13 with the components being

1 S = Re(E H∗ E H∗ ) tx 2 ty tz − tz ty 1 = Re(E H∗ ) −2 tz ty 1 ωǫ E = E z tz −2 tz − k tx ωǫz 2 = Etz, (S127) 2ktx 1 S = Re(E H∗ E H∗ ) tz 2 tx ty − ty tx 1 = Re(E H∗ ) 2 tx ty 1 ωǫzEtz = Etx( ) 2 − ktx 1 ωǫ ǫ k E = E z x tx tx 2 tx − k − ǫ k tx y tz ǫ ωE2 = x tx < 0, (S128) 2ktz because ǫx < 0, and ω, ktz > 0. In order to transmit energy from the interface into the medium, Stx should also be negative, and thus ktx < 0 as ω,ǫz > 0. Together with Eq. (S121), we have

ǫ k = µ ω2ǫ z k2 tx 0 z − ǫ tz r x ǫ = µ ω2ǫ z k2 0 z − ǫ iz r x ǫ = µ ω2ǫ z k2 sin2 θ 0 z − ǫ i r x ǫ = µ ω2ǫ 1 0 sin2 θ , (S129) 0 z − ǫ s x where

2 2 ki = µ0ω ǫ0. (S130)

SVII. ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL FEASIBILITY

According to Refs. [S4, S13], the constitutive relation reads

D~ = ǫDǫ0E~ + P,~ (S131)

B~ = µ0H~ + µ0M,~ (S132) where ǫD and µ0 are, respectively, the permittivity and permeability of diamond without NV centers, E~ and B~ are respectively the electric and magnetic ﬁelds with frequency ω, the electric polarization and magnetization are respectively

n0 d~if (d~fi E~ ) P~ = Re ρi · , (S133) − ~ ω ∆fi + iγ j,i,fX − µ0n0 ~mif (~mfi H~ ) M~ = Re ρi · . (S134) − ~ ω ∆fi + iγ j,i,fX − S14

Here d~ = i d~ f is the matrix element of electric dipole between the initial state i and the final state f ; if h | | i | i | i j is the summation over all NV centers within the volume v0. ∆fi is the transition frequency between the initial and final states; γ is the homogeneous lifetime of all excited states; In the summation the initial and final states shouldP be different, i = f. And the system is initially in a state with density matrix ρ(0) = ρ i i . 6 i i| ih | When there is no magnetic field, the Hamiltonians of the electronic ground and excited states are respectively simplified as P

H = D S2 = D Φc Φc (S135) gs gs z gs | A2;1,ms ih A2;1,ms | mz= 1 X± 2 2 2 c c H = Dk S + ξ(S S ) Dk Φ Φ , (S136) es es z y − x ≃ es | E,α;1,ms ih E,α;1,ms | α mz= 1 X X± where we have dropped the interaction term in order to roughly estimate the minimum density of NV centers in order to realize negative refraction. c c The selection rule of optical transition is summarized as [S17] Φ α′ Φ , where m = 0, 1, both S | A2;S,ms i⇋| E,α;S,ms i s ± and ms are conserved. The transition electric dipole has been experimentally estimated as 11 D [S16]. In order to qualitatively estimate the minimum density of NV centers for realizing negative refraction, without loss of generality, the orientations of all NV centers are assumed to be along the z-axis. Thus, all of the matrix elements of the transition electric dipole are equal

Φc d~ Φc = 11(ˆe +ˆe )D. (S137) h E,α;1,ms | | A2;1,ms i x y

For a specific NV center, eˆz should be replaced by the orientation of its principle axis in the lab coordinate system, i.e., ~rAO, ~rBO, ~rCO, and ~rDO. Initially, the NV center is in the state 1 ρ(0) = Φc Φc . (S138) 3 | A2;1,ms ih A2;1,ms | ms=0, 1 X± Therefore, 4 d~ d~ = 121 (ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ )D2, (S139) if fi 3 × × x x y y x y y x Xi,f n0 d~if (d~fi E~ ) P~ = Re ρi · − ~ ω ∆fi + iγ j,i,fX − (ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ )E~ = 2ǫ ζγRe x x y y x y y x , (S140) − 0 ω ∆ + iγ − fi 242n D2 ζ = 0 , (S141) 9~γǫ0

1 5 where γ− = 10 ns [S17], ǫD =5.7 [S5] and µD =1 2.1 10− [S18] are the relative permittivity and permeability of the pure diamond. For the diamond with NV centers,− the× electric displacement is

D~ = ǫDǫ0E~ + P~ (ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ ) = ǫ 2ζγRe x x y y x y y x ǫ E~ D − ω ∆ + iγ 0 − fi (ω ∆ )(ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ ) = ǫ 2ζγ − fi x x y y x y y x ǫ E~ D − (ω ∆ )2 + γ2 0 − fi (ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ +ê eˆ ) ǫ 2ζγ x x y y x y y x ǫ E~ (S142) ≥ D − 2γ 0 and thus the tensor of relative permittivity is

ǫ ζ ζ 0 D − − ǫ = ζ ǫ ζ 0 (S143) ←→r  − D −  0 0 ǫD   S15

(1) (2) (3) (1) with three principal components being ǫr = ǫD 2ζ, and ǫr = ǫr = ǫD. In order to make ǫr = 0, the critical density of the NV centers is − ~ c 9 γǫD 21 3 n = =1.77 10 m− . (S144) 0 ǫ 484 D2 × 0 × Because as shown in Fig. S1 two carbon atoms occupy the volume

3 2 10 3 3 v = d = (1.78 10− ) m , (S145) √3 × the minimum density of the NV centers to achieve negative refraction is 1 vnc =5.00 ppb, (S146) 2 0 which is within the range of experimental fabrication, e.g. 16 ppm [S20]. For the NV center with the symmetry axis along ~rOA, the principal axis of the negative permittivity is along R(~nOA,θOA)(~ex + ~ey)/√2. For the NV center with the symmetry axis along ~rOB, the principal axis of the negative permittivity is along R(~nOA, θOA)(~ex + ~ey)/√2. For a medium with the above two orientations, the principal axis of the negative permittivity is− along the z-axis. In the same way, we can prove that for a medium with the other two orientations, i.e. the symmetry axis along ~rOC and ~rOD, the principal axis of the negative permittivity is also along the z-axis. Therefore, for the diamond with NV centers along the four possible orientations, the principal axis of the negative permittivity is along the z-axis.

[S1] M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond, Phys. Rep. 528, 1 (2013). [S2] R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics II Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1985). [S3] Q. Ai, Y. Li, H. Zheng, and C. P. Sun, Quantum anti-Zeno effect without rotating wave approximation, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042116 (2010). [S4] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics 3rd ed., (John Wiley, United States, 1999). [S5] J. Fontanella, R. L. Johnston, J. H. Colwell, and C. Andeen, Temperature and pressure variation of the refractive index of diamond, Appl. Opt. 16, 2949 (1977). [S6] R. Marqués, F. Martín, and M. Sorolla, Metamaterials with Negative Parameters: Theory, Design and Microwave Appli- cations (John Wiley, New Jersey, 2008). [S7] J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, S. F. Yelin, and R. L. Walsworth, Tunable negative refraction without absorption via electro- magnetically induced chirality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 073602 (2007). [S8] J. Kästel, M. Fleischhauer, and G. Juzeli¯unas, Local-field effects in magnetodielectric media: Negative refraction and absorption reduction, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062509 (2007). [S9] Y. N. Fang, Y. Shen, Q. Ai, and C. P. Sun, Negative refraction in Möbius molecules, Phys. Rev. A 94, 043805 (2016). [S10] M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond: the electronic solution, New J. Phys. 13, 025019 (2011). [S11] E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. S. Trifonov, L. Jiang, J. Maze, L. Childress, M. V. G. Dutt, A. S. Sørensen, P. R. Hemmer, A. S. Zibrov, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit, Nature 466, 730 (2010). [S12] J. R. Maze, A. Gali, E. Togan, Y. Chu, A. Trifonov, E. Kaxiras, and M. D. Lukin, Properties of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: the group theoretic approach, New J. Phys. 13, 025025 (2011). [S13] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media 2nd Ed., (Butterworth Hein- mann, Oxford, 1995). [S14] L. J. Zou, D. Marcos, S. Diehl, S. Putz, J. Schmiedmayer, J. Majer, and P. Rabl, Implementation of the Dicke lattice model in hybrid quantum system arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023603 (2014). [S15] J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993). [S16] A. Lenef, S. W. Brown, D. A. Redman, and S. C. Rand, Electronic structure of the N-V center in diamond: Experiments, Phys. Rev. B 53, 13427 (1996). [S17] V. M. Acosta, Optical magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2011. [S18] H. D. Young, University Physics 7th Ed., (Addison Wesley, San Francisco, 1992). [S19] P. A. Belov, Backward waves and negative refraction in uniaxial dielectrics with negative dielectric permittivity along the anisotropy axis, Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 37, 259 (2003). S16

[S20] A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker, Temperature- and magnetic-ﬁeld-dependent longi- tudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197601 (2012).