Country Place Apartments

Home , Studio apartment

Staff Report to the M P L 2 0 1 6 - 0 0 0 4 2 Municipal Planning Board I TEM # 1 0 October 18, 2016 COUNTRY PLACE APARTMENTS

Location Map Subject Site

S UMMARY Owners Property Location: The property is located at Staff’s Recommendation: 2407 S Bumby Ave., on the east side of Bumby Staff recommends approval of the Master Plan Frederick Scarola, Manag- Ave., west of Peel Ave., south of E Grant Ave, application subject to the conditions in this report. ing Partner north of E Jersey Ave., (+11.77 acres, District Southeast Orlando Multi- 4). family Partners

Applicant Applicant’s Request: Public Comment Master plan application for the approval to con- Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners Scott Stuart struct 39 new apartment units, between 13 build- within 300 ft. of the subject property the week of KCG Engineering ings, in an existing apartment complex for a total October 3rd, 2016. As of the published date of Project Planner of 239 apartment units. this report, staff has not received any comments from the public concerning this request. Jacques Coulon

Updated: October 12, 2016

Page 2 F UTURE LAND USE MAP

RES-LOW

Z ONING MAP Page 3

P ROJECT ANALYSIS Project Description The subject property is located on the southeast corner of S. Bumby Ave. and E. Grant Ave.. The applicant is seeking master plan approval to construct 39 new apartment units, between 13 buildings, in an existing apartment complex for a total of 239 apartment units. The applicant is also proposing additional site improvements including parking and a new clubhouse.

Previous Actions:  1971: Property annexed into the City of Orlando  1972: Property Platted as Haystack Apartments as recorded in Book 4, Page 77  1972: Existing 200 unit apartment community constructed.  02/17/2016: Property acquired by the current owner.

Project Context The subject property is located on the east side of S. Bumby Ave. south of E. Grant Ave., north of E Crystal Lake Ave. with each of these roads acting as a border for the property. The site currently contains 200 1-bedroom units spread out between 25 2-story buildings. Across each of the bordering streets as well as to the east are single—family homes. The applicant is proposing additional 2- story buildings which will be consistent with the prevailing character of the neighborhood. The proposed development will be compatible with the surrounding uses. (See Table 1) Table 1—Project Context Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Use

North Low-Medium Density Residential R-1A & R-2 (County) Single family residential LMDR (County) East LMDR (County) R-1A & R-2 (County) Single family residential South LMDR (County) R-1A & R-3 (County) Single family residential West LMDR (County) R-3 (County) Single family residential

Conformance with the GMP Located in the Lake Terrace neighborhood, the +/-11.77 acre developed subject site is generally located north of Crystal Lake Ave., south of E. Grant St., east of S. Bumby Ave., and west of Peel Ave. The applicant is requesting a Master Plan to allow the addition of 13 buildings comprised of 39 new apartment units, for a project total of 239 units.

Surrounding uses include single family residential to the north, south, east and to the west, across Bumby Ave. To the south and west there are a couple properties which have been converted to commercial uses. Surrounding future land use designations include Orange County LMDR to the north, south, east and west and associated County zoning of R-2 and R-1A to the north, R-3 and R-1A to the south, R-2 and R-1A to the east and R-3 to the west. Annexed in 1971, the subject property has City Residential Medium In- tensity future land use and R-3B zoning.

As detailed in Future Land Use Element Figure LU-1, the Residential Medium Intensity future land use designation allows for residential and public, recreational and institutional uses. Residential Medium Intensity future land use has a maximum FAR of 0.30 and a maximum density of 30 du/ac. and a minimum of 12 du/ac. and no minimum FAR. The site has a current density of 192 units or 16.3 du/ac. The proposal will increase the density to a total of 231 dwelling units or 19.6 du/ac. The Comprehensive Planning studio defers to Land Development to address the siting of the stormwater ponds in relationship to the new buildings, reconfiguring of parking areas and pedestrian within the site.

Conformance with the LDC The subject site is zoned R-3B (Medium Intensity Development Districts). The R-3B and R-3C districts are intended to provide for flexibility in building and site design in locations where residential development or redevelopment is desired at a medium intensity. The proposed multi-family development is consistent with the LDC except as noted in this report.

The Municipal Planning Board and City Council shall consider the following factors in their review of Master Plan applications: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of the use and all other requirements of the LDC. 2. Growth Management Plan (GMP). The consistency of the proposal with all applicable policies of the City's adopted GMP. Page 4

3. Use and District Requirements. The proposal must conform to the requirements of the zoning district(s) in which it is located and, where applicable, to the requirements of Chapter 58 for the particular use or activity under consideration. 4. Performance and Design Regulations. The proposal must conform to all applicable performance and design regulations of LDC Chapters 58, 60, 61, and 62 and the proposed use must be compatible with surrounding land uses and general character of the neighborhood, including building height, bulk, scale, intensity, traffic, noise, drainage, dust, lighting and general appearance. 5. Public Facilities and Services. Will necessary public facilities (both on- and off-site), such as transportation, sanitation, water, sewer, drainage, emergency services, education, recreation, etc. be adequate to serve the proposed use.

Development Standards:

ISR, Height, and Density Table 2 (below) details the required Density, Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR), building height. The applicant’s proposal meets ISR, Height, and Density requirements of code. Table 2—Development Standards—R3-B Phase Acreage Use Dwelling Density Building Height ISR Units (dwelling units per acre) (impervious surface ratio) Minimum / Proposed Minimum / Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum Maximum Existing 11.438 Multi-Family 200 12 / 21 17.49 No Min./ 0.60 0.374 30 ft. 35 ft. Proposed same Multi-Family 39 12 / 21 21 No Min./ 28.5 ft. 0.60 0.503 35 ft. Total same - - - 239 12 / 21 21 No Min./ 30 ft. 0.60 0.503 35 ft.

Setbacks and Bufferyards The proposed plan meets or exceeds all setback requirements with the exception of the rear yard setback. There is currently a building set back 30.6 ft. from the rear setback and the applicant is proposing one new building at 30 ft. LDC Sec. Sec. 65.302 provides for a Modification of Standards of up to 20% for certain land development standards, including setbacks. Up to a 20% Modification of Standards may be granted through the master plan process. In regards to this case the applicant is seeking to place a single building set back 30 ft. from the rear property line where 35 ft. is required (14% closer than code permits). In terms of the bufferyards, the applicant details a 7 ft. wide buffer yard along the rear and a portion of the Grant St. street-side; bufferyard A is required for all property lines. Table 3 provides details on setbacks and bufferyards. Table 3—Setback and Landscaping Requirements R-3B Building Setbacks Landscaping/Buffers Use or Phase Yard Minimum / Proposed Required* Proposed Maximum Front– S. Bumby Ave. (west) 25 ft./ no max. 28.5 A (7 ft. or 5 ft. w/wall) Street-side– E Grant St. (north) 25 ft./ no max. 25 A (7 ft. or 5 ft. w/wall) Portion A Multi-Family ( 7 ft. –no wall) (under 75 ft. in height) Street Side– E Crystal Lake Ave. 25 ft./ no max. 25 A (7 ft. or 5 ft. w/wall) ROW (south) Rear (East) 35 ft./ no max. 30 A (7 ft. or 5 ft. w/wall) A ( 7 ft. –no wall) * Dimensions refer to range of acceptable buffer depth; each requires plantings and/or screen wall

Transportation Streets and Site Access Access to the development will be provided via two gated entrances, one off of S. Bumby Ave, and one off of E Grant St. Internal circulation is maintained through a series of drives that run throughout the site and connect the two entrances.

Page 55

Sidewalks The applicant has provided details of interconnected sidewalks throughout the development. Pedestrian access from S. Bumby and E Grant St. into the site via clearly marked sidewalks is required as are pedestrian gates at both entrances. While the applicant has provided details of new sidewalks within the apartment community there is no indication of crosswalks; the applicant will be required to provide crosswalks at key intersections throughout the property to ensure clear pedestrian paths across more highly traveled vehicular paths.

Parking According to the proposed unit mix this development will require a total of 368 parking spaces at time of full-development, as detailed in Table 4. The plan as submitted include the correct overall number of parking stalls. However, only 4 ADA accessible stalls are shown. A facility with between 301 and 400 total stalls is required to have a minimum of 8 Table 4—Parking Requirements ADA compliant spaces. The dimension of aisles Use Dwelling Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum and stalls are within Code as submitted. Units Ratio Spaces Ratio Spaces Required Permitted Per City Code Sec 61.333, bike racks must be 1-Bedroom/ installed to provide space for 48 bikes to be se- 200 units 1.5/unit 300 Studio Apartment cured. The racks must conform to City standards 2-Bedroom and be located on an impervious surface so as 39 units 1.75/unit 68 N/A N/A not to interfere with pedestrian or other vehicu- Apartment lar movements. The racks should be distributed Total Required N/A N/A 368 throughout the park to provide convenient access to all buildings. The locations for the racks Total Provided 369* must be shown on plans submitted to Permitting *8 ADA compliant spaces are required, only 4 are shown. Services.

Architecture/Urban Design The site currently contains 25 2-story barracks style apartment buildings; each building contains 8 1-bedroom apartments. The buildings are currently undergoing renovation of the interior and exterior including the replacement of wall mounted air conditioners with new ground mounted air conditioners as well as new paint and roofing. The applicant is proposing to add 13 new 2-story townhome style apartment buildings; each building will contain three 2-bedroom apartments. Where the existing buildings are spread across the property in a seemingly haphazard manner, the new buildings will serve to frame the interior of the property providing a better sense of differentiation between the parking areas and more private landscaped areas. The architecture of the new buildings seeks to inte- grate with the existing buildings through the use of a textured siding on the first floor and a cedar siding on the second floor, mirror- ing the siding materials on the existing buildings.

Signage The applicant is not proposing a Master Sign Plan as part of the current application. Signage will conform to the City of Orlando signage standards as set forth in Chapter 64 of the LDC. A Master Sign Plan will be submitted to the City Planning Department in subsequent submittals.

Environmental As previously described the site currently consists of an apartment community with buildings scattered throughout the property. Each building roughly faces a parking area with the remainder of the space to the exterior of the buildings and parking area minimal- ly landscaped. The applicant is proposing to remove a large number of trees across the site, over 50, including a large number along the rear property line and within the northeastern corner of the property.

Infrastructure Stormwater: The applicant is planning to accommodate all storm-water on site through swales and retention pods and has provided a conceptual stormwater plan on the overall site plan sheet of this submittal

Wastewater: The proposed utility plan shows new buildings proposed to be built over top of existing sanitary sewers. No buildings or otherwise permanent structures may be constructed over top of sanitary sewer infrastructure.

Solid Waste: There are three dumpsters on site which will remain after redevelopment, an additional dumpster is proposed to serve the southern Page 66 portion of the property. Dumpsters must be contained in an enclosure with a structure the incorporates architectural materials and design details similar to the principal buildings and must have gates to shield the area from view when not in use. Design of gates shall be solid and have architectural interest to complement the buildings.

Public Safety: The Orlando Police Department has reviewed the plans for expansion of Country Place Apartments located at 2407 S. Bumby Ave., utilizing CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles. CPTED emphasizes the proper design and effective use of a created environment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life. There are four overlapping strategies in CPTED that apply to any development: Natural Surveillance, Natural Access Control, Territorial Reinforcement and Target Hardening.

School Impacts This project is zoned for Kaley Elementary School, Howard Middle School, and Boone School. On July 7, 2008, the City adopted a Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implemen- tation of Concurrency which requires all residential developments be subject to school concurrency review. The applicant has received a Capacity Encumbrance Letter from OCPS. Page 77

AERIAL P HOTO Page 8

E XISTING S URVEY Page 9 P ROPOSED S ITE P LAN

Note: MPB approval is for the exhibits shown and subject to the conditions of approval found within this staff report and as approved by City Council. All exhibits, project descriptions, and footnotes submitted as part of the application are superseded by this staff report. Page 10 P ROPOSED S ITE P LAN

Add crosswalks at the locations outlined below.

Additional Trees

E Grant St.

S BumbyAve. S Page 12

ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES /ELEVATIONS Page 13

ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES /ELEVATIONS Page 14 S ITE P HOTOS

Existing entrance from S Bumby Ave. into subject property looking northeast.

View from the corner of S Bumby Ave. and E Grant St. looking south east.

View of the architecture of the existing buildings Page 1515 F INDINGS Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of the Masterplan and framework plan applications contained in Section 65.335 of the Land Development Code (LDC): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the AC-2 and AC-2/SP zoning district and meets all other requirements of the LDC. 3. The proposed use will be compatible with surrounding land uses and the general character of the area. 4. The necessary public facilities be adequate to serve the proposed use or will be provided by the applicant as a condition of this approval.

Staff recommends approval of the Framework Master Plan subject to the following conditions:

CONDITIONS OF APP ROVAL Growth Management 1. The Comprehensive Planning Studio has no objection to the proposed master plan application provided that Ordinance #2016-13 and Ordinance #2016-14 are approved by City Council.

Land Development 1. Land Use and Zoning. Except as provided herein, development of the property shall be consistent with the development standards of the AC-2 and AC-2/SP zoning districts. 2. General Code Compliance. Development of the proposed project should be consistent with the conditions in this report and all codes and ordinances of the City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and all other applicable regulatory agencies. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencing development. 3. Minor modifications. Zoning variances and modification of standards may be approved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Part 2J and Part 2F, Chapter 65, Orlando City Code, respectively. The planning official may also approve minor modifications and design modifications to fences, walls, landscaping, accessory structures, signs, and bufferyard requirements. Additionally, recognizing that development plans can change in small ways between the planning and permitting stages of development, the planning official may approve up to a 10% modification of any applicable numerical development standard if the planning official finds that the proposed modification is consistent with the applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP, is compatible with nearby existing land uses, would not result in inadequate public facilities, and is otherwise consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. When approving such a modification of a development standard, the planning official may impose one or more of the conditions of development provided at section 65.334, Orlando City Code, but such condition or conditions must be reasonably calculated to mitigate the identifiable land use impacts of the modified standard. 4. A separate pedestrian connection must be installed at each vehicular gate providing pedestrians access to the site via a separate sidewalk from both Bumby Ave. and Grant St.. 5. Pedestrian crosswalks must be provided at the following locations and must be designed and constructed to appear visually dis- tinct from the adjacent driving surface through the use of colored or textured concrete. 6. From the sidewalk off of E Grant St. across the access drive to the south before the automotive gate. 7. Connecting the sidewalk on the west side of the entrance drive from E Grant St. south to the sidewalk that runs east/ west on the north side of the clubhouse. 8. Connecting the sidewalk along the southern side of the entry off of S Bumby Ave. to the east across the first and second drive aisles towards to clubhouse. 9. From the north of the two proposed apartment buildings (just to the west of the clubhouse) north, across the main east- west drive aisle. 10. Master Plan Approval. Approval of the Master Plan by City Council shall grant the applicant authority to submit an application for preliminary plat and/or Specific Parcel Master Plan. Such application must be submitted within 24 months of approval or the Master Plan shall expire. However, the Planning Official may extend this time limit for one period of up to twelve months for good cause shown upon written application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date. 11. Permit Compliance. All plans submitted with the applicant's building permit application(s) must comply with the conditions of approval provided in the Municipal Planning Board staff report and any amendments to those conditions approved by the Mu- nicipal Planning Board or City Council. No building permit will be issued for this project until all conditions of approval are complied with and reflected in the plans submitted with the building permit application. 12. Regulations Subject to Code. Except as provided herein, the proposed project is subject to the conditions of this report and all codes and ordinances of the State of Florida, City of Orlando and all other applicable regulatory agencies. All other applicable Page 1616 state or federal permits must also be obtained before commencing development. 13. As provided by subsection 166.033(5), Florida Statutes, issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. In accordance with subsection 166.033(5), Florida Statutes, it is hereby made a condition of this permit that all other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development.

Urban Design Appearance Review 1. An Appearance Review must be conducted prior to building permits being issued. All Urban Design conditions of approval must be addressed in revised drawings prior to Appearance Review meeting.

Architecture 1. Architectural elevations must be generally consistent with those provided in the Master Plan application except where directed otherwise herein and in accordance with the required appearance review. Significant deviation from those elevations will require a master plan amendment. Minor changes may be approved by staff. 2. Primary pedestrian entries must be clearly expressed and highlighted, and recessed or framed by a sheltering element such as an awning, arcade, porch or portico. 3. Any new adjacent multifamily buildings, or new multifamily buildings directly opposite each other on the same street, must have identical facades and colors. A tabulation of building styles shall be provided and updated with each building permit application. 4. Architectural details and forms must be authentic to and consistent with the architectural style chosen for the individual buildings. All multifamily buildings must incorporate details used in or complementary to the new clubhouse. 5. Each doorway entrance to each multifamily unit must incorporate a coachlight or wall sconce lighting fixture to the side or above the doorway. 6. A true pedestrian entrance for the new clubhouse must be in the north façade, and must be architecturally highlighted. The north and west facades of the new clubhouse must have at least 15% transparency, and at least 7.5% transparency in the south and east facades. 7. Ground floor glass must be clear on all facades of all buildings (minimum of 80% light transmittance), or low-e glass with a minimum light transmittance of 60%. All other glass must meet a minimum 66% transmittance. Darkly tinted or reflective glass is prohibited.

Utilities and Dumpsters 1. Exterior HVAC equipment must be screened from public view, and must not be placed between the buildings and public rights- of-way and the parking areas. 2. All utilities, including street light poles, must be kept out of the pedestrian path. Outdoor lighting must comply with Chapter 63, Part 2M, City Code. White light-emitting diode (LED) lamps are encouraged. 3. All dumpsters and trash compactors must be screened with solid walls to match the principal structure. Decorative gates must be installed to coordinate with principal structure. Landscape screen including low hedge and groundcover is required to soften the view from the public ROW.

General 1. Fencing - Any fencing along the public rights-of-way must be open, CPTED-approved fence, such as aluminum or wrought-iron picket fencing. Any chain link fencing on site must be 6-gage vinyl-clad black fencing, with top and bottom rails. 2. Minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian pathways must connect from the principal building entrances and exits to the sidewalks and parking. 3. The central internal private driveway from Bumby must be designed for the appearance of a public street, with sidewalks, curbs, lighting, street trees, and other amenities.

Landscaping 1. Treat the driveway entrances from both Bumby Avenue and Grant Street with formal street tree and landscape planting schemes as on p. 11. 2. All landscaping and irrigations must comply with Chapters 60 and 61 of City Code. All parking row ends must have a landscape area and tree, per Chapter 61. 3. Street tree planting must be completed along Bumby Avenue and Grant Street frontages. The street trees must be installed in accordance with City Code. In locations where installation of street trees within the street right-of-way or a City services easement is infeasible, the trees must be installed on the site within 10 feet of the right-of-way. Any canopy trees installed in the public right-of-way in a planting area that is less than 10 feet in width (or on private property less than 5 feet from public side- Page 1717

walks) must be installed with appropriate techniques to protect sidewalks, curbs, and infrastructure. Such techniques may include structural soil, pavement-supporting structures, root tunnels, and root barriers, and must be approved by the Appearance Review Official at time of permitting. 4. Existing trees (not including those classified as invasive, exotic species) must be preserved to the extent practical. The place- ment of underground utilities, including irrigation, within the driplines of existing trees to be preserved must be done by means of tunneling rather than trenching. Any melaleuca, chinaberry, Chinese tallow, Brazilian pepper, camphor, or Australian pines existing on the site must be removed. 5. Tree clearing (excluding the clearing of invasive exotic species) must not commence on any parcel until full site and building development plans have been approved. 6. The project is a new construction within a larger existing development. Replace the existing irrigation controller for the overall development with an irrigation control system complying with Section 60.231 of City Code.

Transportation Planning 1. The plan as submitted includes the correct overall number of parking stalls. However, only 4 ADA accessible stalls are shown. A facility with between 301 and 400 total stalls is required to have a minimum of 8 ADA compliant spaces. The dimension of aisles and stalls are within Code as submitted. 2. Per City Code Sec 61.333, bike racks must be installed to provide space for 48 bikes to be secured. The racks must conform to City standards and be located on an impervious surface so as not to interfere with pedestrian or other vehicular movements. The racks should be distributed throughout the park to provide convenient access to all buildings. The locations for the racks must be shown on plans submitted to Permitting Services.

Transportation Engineering 1. Sidewalk connections from the Grant St and Bumby Ave sidewalk shall be provided on both sides of the proposed driveways. 2. Internal sidewalk connections shall be provided between all existing and proposed residential buildings. 3. If the Bumby Ave access is to be an entrance and exit, then the driveway shall provide room for a vehicle to turn around that does not have access through the gate. If the Bumby Ave access is an exit only, then it shall be signed and marked as such at Bumby Ave. 4. All existing and proposed parking drive aisle and parking space dimensions shall be brought into compliance with Orlando LDC and ESM. 5. On-site sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5’ wide when adjacent to drive aisles and 6’ wide when adjacent to parking stalls un- less wheel stops are used. 6. At all project entrances, clear sight distances for drivers and pedestrians shall not be blocked by signs, buildings, building col- umns, landscaping, or other visual impediments. No structure, fence, wall, or other visual impediment shall obstruct vision between 2 feet and 8 feet in height above street level. The street corner / driveway visibility area shall be shown and noted on construction plans and any future site plan submittals. The applicant shall design the site plan as necessary to comply with the Flori- da Greenbook and the FDOT Design Standards Index. Sight lines shall be provided on both site plans and landscape plans. 7. The final site plan shall show the location and size of the on-site solid waste compactor(s) / dumpster(s) with concrete pads, and enclosures with doors. The solid waste container(s) shall not be located adjacent to any single family houses or directly adjacent to the public street. Dumpsters shall be located to provide a minimum 50 feet of clear backup space and constructed per Orlando Engineering Standards Manual (ESM) requirements, OR documentation shall be provided from the City's Solid Waste Division indicating curb pick-up or other approved arrangement. 8. For any construction work planned or required within a public right-of-way or City sidewalk easement adjacent to a public right -of-way (including but not limited to: irrigation, drainage, utility, cable, sidewalk, driveway, road construction/reconstruction or landscaping), the Owner/Applicant shall submit the following: a. Maintenance of traffic plans (M.O.T.) (For more information/detailed requirements contact the Office of Special Events & Permits at 407-246-3704) b. Roadway plans including paving, grading, pavement markings and signage (Contact the Permitting Transportation Engineer- ing Reviewer at 407-246-3079 for details) c. A copy of all required County and State permits (If permits are pending attach a copy of the application)

Transportation Impact Fees 1. Any new construction, change in use, addition, or redevelopment of a site or structure shall be subject to a review for Transpor- tation Impact Fees. An estimated Transportation Impact Fee in the amount of $101,080.00, based on the construction of 40- multi-family residential units, will be due at the time of building permit issuance, subject to change upon final permit plan review. 2. For a copy of the complete ordinance or impact fee rate chart, you may reference our website at: http://www.cityoforlando.net/ planning/Transportation/ifees.htm 3. The applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 59, the Concurrency Management Ordinance, to ensure Page 1818 that all public facilities and services are available concurrent with the proposed development, and that the potential impacts on public facilities and services are mitigated.

Wastwater 1. The proposed utility plan shows new buildings proposed to be built over top of existing sanitary sewers. No buildings or otherwise permanent structures may be constructed over top of sanitary sewer infrastructure.

I NFORMATIONAL C OMMENTS

OUC – Water 1. Submit detailed water utility plans to Orlando Utilities Commission Development Services. See our Website for submittal information http://www.ouc.com/business/water-services.

Trees-Removal 1. Contact Justin Garber, Parks Department at (407) 246-4047 or [email protected] for a tree removal permit before removing any 4” caliper or larger trees.

Police 1. The Orlando Police Department has reviewed the plans for expansion of Country Place Apartments located at 2407 S. Bumby Ave., utilizing CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles. CPTED emphasizes the proper design and effective use of a created environment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life. There are four overlapping strategies in CPTED that apply to any development: Natural Surveillance, Natural Access Control, Territorial Reinforcement and Target Hardening. 2. CPTED conditions will be emailed to the client by the Project Manager with the City. For questions regarding the Orlando Po- lice Department plan review, please contact Audra Nordaby at 407.246.2454 or [email protected].

Building 1. Building Plan Review is not applicable to this case at this time. 2. The building design will be reviewed for code compliance during the design development and construction documents phase.

Fire 1. There are no objections to this request. TRC fire code review is preliminary in nature, and is intended to expose or prevent evi- dent design deficiencies with State and City Fire Codes. The design, hydrant location and fire department access will be reviewed in detail for State and City Fire Code compliance at the time of permit application. Be advised that any new construction must adhere to the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2012 Edition, and The City of Orlando Fire Prevention Code. Page 1919 CONTACT INFORMATION Growth Management For questions regarding Growth Management plan review, please contact Mary-Stewart Droege at (407) 246-3276 or mary- [email protected].

Land Development For questions regarding Land Development review, please contact Jacques Coulon at (407) 246-3427 or [email protected].

Urban Design For questions regarding Urban Design plan review, please contact Terrence Miller, at (407) 246-3292 or Ter- [email protected].

Transportation Engineering For questions regarding Transportation Engineering plan review, please contact Lauren Torres at 407-246-3262 or lau- [email protected]

Transportation Planning For questions regarding Transportation Planning plan review, please contact John Rhoades at 407-246-2293 or [email protected]

Transportation Impact Fees For questions and information regarding Transportation Impact Fee rates you may contact Nancy Ottini at (407) 246-3529 or nan- [email protected]

Development Review For questions regarding Development Review contact Keith Grayson at 407.246.3234 or [email protected]. To obtain plan review status, schedule/cancel an inspection and obtain inspection results, please call PROMPT, our Interactive Response Sys- tem at 407.246.4444.

Police For questions regarding the Orlando Police Department plan review, please contact Audra Nordaby at 407.246.2454 or Au- [email protected].

Fire For any questions regarding fire issues, please contact Charles Howard at 407.246.2143 or at [email protected]. To obtain plan review status, schedule/cancel an inspection and obtain inspection results, please call PROMPT, our Interactive Voice Response System at 407.246.4444.

Building For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at (407) 246-2654 or [email protected].

Tree Removal For questions regarding tree removal or encroachment contact Justin Garber at [email protected].

Waste Water For questions regarding Waste Water plan review, please contact Vince Genco at [email protected].

R EVIEW /APPROVAL P ROCESS —N EXT S TEPS 1. MPB minutes scheduled for review and approval by City Council. 2. Administrative planning review for specific parcel master plans. 3. Once the Administrative Review is complete building permits may be applied for.