DOCSLIB.ORG

Physics of Neutron Star Crusts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Physics of Neutron Star Crusts Nicolas Chamel Institut d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique Universit´eLibre de Bruxelles CP226 Boulevard du Triomphe B-1050 Brussels, Belgium email: [email protected] http://www-astro.ulb.ac.be/ Pawel Haensel Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center Polish Academy of Sciences Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warszawa, Poland email: [email protected] http://www.camk.edu.pl Abstract The physics of neutron star crusts is vast, involving many different research fields, from nu- clear and condensed matter physics to general relativity. This review summarizes the progress, which has been achieved over the last few years, in modeling neutron star crusts, both at the microscopic and macroscopic levels. The confrontation of these theoretical models with obser- vations is also briefly discussed. arXiv:0812.3955v1 [astro-ph] 20 Dec 2008 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Plasma Parameters 9 2.1 Nomagneticfield.................................. ... 9 2.2 Effectsofmagneticfields. ...... 12 3 The Ground State Structure of Neutron Star Crusts 14 3.1 Structureoftheoutercrust . ....... 14 3.2 Structureoftheinnercrust . ....... 17 3.2.1 Liquiddropmodels.............................. .. 18 3.2.2 Semi-classicalmodels. ..... 21 3.2.3 Quantumcalculations . ... 24 3.2.4 Goingfurther: nuclearbandtheory. ....... 29 3.3 Pastas.......................................... 32 3.4 Impuritiesanddefects .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... 35 4 Accreting Neutron Star Crusts 36 4.1 Accreting neutron stars in low-mass X-ray binaries . .............. 36 4.2 Nuclear processes and formation of accreted crusts . .............. 37 4.3 Deepcrustalheating .............................. ..... 40 4.4 Thermal structure of accreted crusts and X-ray bursts . .............. 44 5 Equation of State 46 5.1 Groundstatecrust ................................ .... 46 5.2 Accretedcrust ................................... ... 50 5.3 EffectofmagneticfieldsontheEoS . ...... 51 5.4 Supernovacoreatsubnucleardensity . .......... 51 6 Crust in Global Neutron Star Structure 54 6.1 Sphericalnonrotatingneutronstars. ........... 55 6.2 Approximateformulae .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... 56 6.3 Crustinrotatingneutronstars . ........ 58 6.4 Effects of magnetic fields on the crust structure . ............ 61 7 Elastic Properties 63 7.1 Isotropicsolid(polycrystal) . .......... 64 7.2 Nuclearpasta.................................... ... 66 8 Superfluidity and Superconductivity 68 8.1 Superconductivity in neutron star crusts . ............ 68 8.2 Static properties of neutron superfluidity . ............. 69 8.2.1 Neutron pairing gap in uniform neutron matter at zero temperature . 70 8.2.2 Critical temperature for neutron superfluidity . ............ 73 8.2.3 Pairinggapinneutronstarcrusts . ...... 74 8.3 Superfluidhydrodynamics . ...... 77 8.3.1 Superflowandcriticalvelocity . ...... 77 8.3.2 Rotatingsuperfluidandvortices . ...... 80 8.3.3 Type II superconductors and magnetic flux tubes . ......... 83 8.3.4 Superfluid vortices and magnetic flux tubes in neutron stars......... 83 2 8.3.5 Dynamicsofsuperfluidvortices . ...... 84 8.3.6 Superfluid hydrodynamics and entrainment . ........ 86 8.3.7 Entrainmenteffectsinneutronstars . ....... 88 9 Conductivity and Viscosity 89 9.1 Introduction.................................... .... 89 9.2 Boltzmann equation for electrons and its solutions . .............. 89 9.3 Thermaland electricalconductivities . ............ 92 9.4 Viscosity....................................... ... 94 9.5 Transport in the presence of strong magnetic fields . ............. 97 9.5.1 Nonquantizing magnetic fields . ...... 99 9.5.2 Weakly-quantizing magnetic fields . ....... 99 9.5.3 Strongly-quantizing magnetic fields . ......... 99 9.5.4 Possible dominance of ion conduction . ....... 99 10 Macroscopic Model of Neutron Star Crusts 100 10.1 Variational formulation of multi-fluid hydrodynamics ................. 100 10.2 Two-fluidmodelofneutronstarcrust . ......... 101 10.3 Entrainmentandeffectivemasses . ......... 103 10.4 Neutronsuperfluidity. ....... 104 11 Neutrino Emission 107 11.1 Neutrino emission processes – an overview . ............ 107 11.2 Electron-positronpairannihilation . ............. 108 11.3Plasmondecay ................................... ... 109 11.4 Photoneutrinoemission . ....... 109 11.5 Neutrino Bremsstrahlung from electron-nucleus collisions .............. 109 11.6 Cooperpairingofneutrons . ....... 110 11.7 Synchrotronradiationfromelectrons . ............ 111 11.8 Other neutrino emission mechanisms . .......... 111 11.8.1 Direct Urca process in the pasta phase of the crust . ........... 111 11.9 Neutrinos from the crust – summary in the T ρ plane ............... 112 − 12 Observational Constraints on Neutron Star Crusts 117 12.1 Supernovae and the physics of hot dense inhomogeneous matter........... 117 12.2 Coolingofisolatedneutronstars . .......... 120 12.2.1 Thermalrelaxationofthecrust . ....... 121 12.2.2 Observational constraints from thermal X-ray emission............ 122 12.3 r-process in the decompression of cold neutron star crusts .............. 124 12.4Pulsarglitches ................................. ..... 126 12.4.1 Starquakemodel ............................... 128 12.4.2 Two-componentmodels . ... 129 12.4.3 Recenttheoreticaldevelopments . ........ 130 12.4.4 Pulsar glitch constraints on neutron star structure .............. 131 12.5 Gravitationalwaveasteroseismology . ............ 133 12.5.1 Mountainsonneutronstars . ..... 133 12.5.2 Oscillationsandprecession . ....... 135 12.5.3 Crust-core boundary and r-mode instability . ........... 136 12.6 GiantflaresfromSoftGammaRepeaters . ........ 136 12.7 LowmassX-raybinaries. ...... 140 12.7.1 Burstoscillations. ..... 140 3 12.7.2 SoftX-raytransientsinquiescence . ......... 141 12.7.3 Initial cooling in quasi-persistent SXTs . ........... 142 13 Conclusion 147 14 Acknowledgments 148 A List of Notations 149 B List of Abbreviations 151 4 1 Introduction Constructing models of neutron stars requires knowledge of the physics of matter with a density significantly exceeding the density of atomic nuclei. The simplest picture of the atomic nucleus is a drop of highly incompressible nuclear matter. Analysis of nuclear masses tells us that nuclear matter at saturation (i.e. at the minimum of the energy per nucleon) has the density ρ0 = 2.8 14 −3 × 10 g cm , often called normal nuclear density. It corresponds to n0 =0.16 nucleons per fermi cubed. The density in the cores of massive neutron stars is expected to be as large as 5–10ρ0 and in spite of decades of observations of neutron stars and intense theoretical studies, the∼ structure of the matter in neutron star cores and in particular its equation of state remain the well-kept secret of neutron stars (for a recent review, see the book by Haensel, Potekhin and Yakovlev [183]). The physics of matter with ρ 5–10ρ0 is a huge challenge to theorists, with observations of neutron stars being crucial for selecting∼ a correct dense-matter model. Up to now, progress has been slow and based overwhelmingly on scant observation [183]. The outer layer of neutron stars with density ρ<ρ0 – the neutron star crust – which is the subject of the present review, represents very different theoretical challenges and observational opportunities. The elementary constituents of the matter are neutrons, protons, and electrons – like in the atomic matter around us. The density is “subnuclear”, so that the methods devel- oped and successfully applied in the last decades to terrestrial nuclear physics can be applied to neutron star crusts. Of course, the physical conditions are extreme and far from terrestrial ones. The compression of matter by gravity crushes atoms and forces, through electron captures, the neutronization of the matter. This effect of huge pressure was already predicted in the 1930s (Sterne [390], Hund [201, 202]). At densities ρ & 4 1011 g cm−3 a fraction of the neutrons is unbound and forms a gas around the nuclei. For a density× approaching 1014 g cm−3, some 90% of nucleons are neutrons while nuclei are represented by proton clusters with a small neutron fraction. How far we are taken from terrestrial nuclei with a moderate neutron excess! Finally, somewhat above 1014 g cm−3 nuclei can no longer exist – they coalesce into a uniform plasma of nearly-pure neutron matter, with a few percent admixture of protons and electrons: we reach the bottom of the neutron star crust. The crust contains only a small percentage of a neutron star’s mass, but it is crucial for many astrophysical phenomena involving neutron stars. It contains matter at subnuclear density, and therefore there is no excuse for the theoretical physicists, at least in principle: the interactions are known, and many-body theory techniques are available. Neutron star crusts are wonderful cosmic laboratories in which the full power of theoretical physics can be demonstrated and hopefully confronted with neutron star observations. To construct neutron star crust models we have to employ atomic and plasma physics, as well as the theory of condensed matter, the physics of matter in strong magnetic fields, the theory of nuclear structure, nuclear reactions, the nuclear many-body problem, superfluidity, physical kinetics, hydrodynamics, the physics of liquid crystals, and the theory of elasticity. Theories have to be applied under extreme physical conditions, very far from the domains where they were originally developed and tested. Therefore, caution is a must! Most of this review is devoted to theoretical descriptions of various
Recommended publications
  • WHAT's BEHIND the MYSTERIOUS GAMMA-RAY BURSTS? LIGO's

    WHAT's BEHIND the MYSTERIOUS GAMMA-RAY BURSTS? LIGO's

    WHAT’S BEHIND THE MYSTERIOUS GAMMA-RAY BURSTS? LIGO’s SEARCH FOR CLUES TO THEIR ORIGINS The story of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) began in the 1960s aboard spacecrafts designed to monitor the former Soviet Union for compliance with the nuclear test ban treaty of 1963. The satellites of the Vela series, each armed with a number of caesium iodide scintillation counters, recorded many puzzling bursts of gamma-ray radiation that did not fit the expected signature of a nuclear weapon. The existence of these bursts became public knowledge in 1973, beginning a decades long quest to understand their origin. Since then, scientists have launched many additional satellites to study these bursts (gamma rays are blocked by the earth's atmosphere) and have uncovered many clues. GRBs occur approximately once a day in a random point in the sky. Most FIGURES FROM THE PUBLICATION GRBs originate millions or billions of light years away. The fact that they For more information on how these figures were generated, and are still so bright by the time they get to earth makes them some of the their meaning, see the publication preprint at arXiv. most energetic astrophysical events observed in the electromagnetic spectrum. In fact, a typical GRB will release in just a handful of seconds as much energy as our sun will throughout its entire life. They can last anywhere from hundredths of seconds to thousands of seconds, but are roughly divided into two categories based on duration (long and short). The line between the two classes is taken to be at 2 seconds (although more sophisticated features are also taken into account in the classification).
  • SHELL BURNING STARS: Red Giants and Red Supergiants

    SHELL BURNING STARS: Red Giants and Red Supergiants

    SHELL BURNING STARS: Red Giants and Red Supergiants There is a large variety of stellar models which have a distinct core – envelope structure. While any main sequence star, or any white dwarf, may be well approximated with a single polytropic model, the stars with the core – envelope structure may be approximated with a composite polytrope: one for the core, another for the envelope, with a very large difference in the “K” constants between the two. This is a consequence of a very large difference in the specific entropies between the core and the envelope. The original reason for the difference is due to a jump in chemical composition. For example, the core may have no hydrogen, and mostly helium, while the envelope may be hydrogen rich. As a result, there is a nuclear burning shell at the bottom of the envelope; hydrogen burning shell in our example. The heat generated in the shell is diffusing out with radiation, and keeps the entropy very high throughout the envelope. The core – envelope structure is most pronounced when the core is degenerate, and its specific entropy near zero. It is supported against its own gravity with the non-thermal pressure of degenerate electron gas, while all stellar luminosity, and all entropy for the envelope, are provided by the shell source. A common property of stars with well developed core – envelope structure is not only a very large jump in specific entropy but also a very large difference in pressure between the center, Pc, the shell, Psh, and the photosphere, Pph. Of course, the two characteristics are closely related to each other.
  • Astro 404 Lecture 30 Nov. 6, 2019 Announcements

    Astro 404 Lecture 30 Nov. 6, 2019 Announcements

    Astro 404 Lecture 30 Nov. 6, 2019 Announcements: • Problem Set 9 due Fri Nov 8 2 3/2 typo corrected in L24 notes: nQ = (2πmkT/h ) • Office Hours: Instructor – after class or by appointment • TA: Thursday noon-1pm or by appointment • Exam: grading elves hard at work Last time: low-mass stars after main sequence Q: burning phases? 1 Q: shell burning “mirror” principle? Low-Mass Stars After Main Sequence unburnt H ⋆ helium core contracts H He H burning in shell around core He outer layers expand → red giant “mirror” effect of shell burning: • core contraction, envelope expansion • total gravitational potential energy Ω roughly conserved core becomes more tightly bound, envelope less bound ⋆ helium ignition degenerate core unburnt H H He runaway burning: helium flash inert He → 12 He C+O 2 then core helium burning 3α C and shell H burning “horizontal branch” star unburnt H H He ⋆ for solar mass stars: after CO core forms inert He He C • helium shell burning begins inert C • hydrogen shell burning continues Q: star path on HR diagram during these phases? 3 Low-Mass Post-Main-Sequence: HR Diagram ⋆ H shell burning ↔ red giant ⋆ He flash marks “tip of the red giant branch” ⋆ core He fusion ↔ horizontal branch ⋆ He + H shell burning ↔ asymptotic giant branch asymptotic giant branch H+He shell burn He flash core He burn L main sequence horizontal branch red giant branch H shell burning Sun Luminosity 4 Temperature T iClicker Poll: AGB Star Intershell Region in AGB phase: burning in two shells, no core fusion unburnt H H He inert He He C Vote your conscience–all
  • Nanda Rea Institute for Space Science, CSIC-IEEC, Barcelona

    Nanda Rea Institute for Space Science, CSIC-IEEC, Barcelona

    Magnetar candidates: new discoveries open new questions Nanda Rea Institute for Space Science, CSIC-IEEC, Barcelona Image Credit: ESA - Christophe Carreau Isolated Neutron Stars: P-Pdot diagram 2 6 4 2 ⎛ 8 2R 6 ⎞ ˙ 2 2 2B R Ω sin α ˙ π ns 2 2 E rot = − m˙˙ = − PP = ⎜ 3 ⎟ B0 sin α 3c 3 3c 3 ⎝ 3c I ⎠ m 2c 3 B = e = 4.414 "1013Gauss Critical Electron Quantum B-field critic e! € Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC € ! AXPs and SGRs general properties • bright X-ray pulsars Lx ~ 1033-1036 erg/s • strong soft and hard X-ray emission • rotating with periods of ~2-12s and period derivatives of ~10-11-10-13 s/s (Rea et al. 2007) • pulsed fractions ranging from ~5-70 % • magnetic fields of ~1014-1015 Gauss (Rea et al. 2004) (see Mereghetti 2008, A&AR, for a review) Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC AXPs and SGRs general properties (Kaspi et al. 2003) Short bursts • the most common • they last ~0.1s • peak ~1041 ergs/s • soft γ-rays thermal spectra Intermediate bursts (Israel et al. 2008) • they last 1-40 s • peak ~1041-1043 ergs/s • abrupt on-set • usually soft γ-rays thermal spectra Giant Flares (Palmer et al. 2005) • their output of high energy is exceeded only by blazars and GRBs • peak energy > 3x1044 ergs/s • <1 s initial peak with a hard spectrum which rapidly become softer in the burst tail that can last > 500s, showing the NS spin pulsations. Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC AXPs and SGRs general properties • transient outbursts lasting months-years • in a few cases radio pulsed emission was observed connected with X-ray outbursts, with variable flux and profiles, and flat spectra (Rea & Esposito 2010, APSS Springer Review) Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC AXPs and SGRs general properties bursts/outbursts activity !""" &*$..+0$ (6$/&(.$ "-#$/+.)$ #2"$&,/'$ &*$&'(&$ !"" 425$/&//$ 425$&)(,$ !" 425$&,&($ "-#$&'/)$ "-#$/+/&$ "-#$&0//$ "-#$&'11$ &*$&/('$ ! '()*+,- 23*$&'&/$ "#! "-#$&).,$ !"#$%&'()$ !"#$&)..$ "#"! &*$&+(,$ !"ï& "#$! % $ !" %" ./0!"!1/23 Nanda Rea CSIC-IEEC Why magnetars behave differently from normal pulsars? • Their internal magnetic field is twisted up to 10 times the external dipole.
  • Massive Fast Rotating Highly Magnetized White Dwarfs: Theory and Astrophysical Applications

    Massive Fast Rotating Highly Magnetized White Dwarfs: Theory and Astrophysical Applications

    Massive Fast Rotating Highly Magnetized White Dwarfs: Theory and Astrophysical Applications Thesis Advisors Ph.D. Student Prof. Remo Ruffini Diego Leonardo Caceres Uribe* Dr. Jorge A. Rueda *D.L.C.U. acknowledges the financial support by the International Relativistic Astrophysics (IRAP) Ph.D. program. Academic Year 2016–2017 2 Contents General introduction 4 1 Anomalous X-ray pulsars and Soft Gamma-ray repeaters: A new class of pulsars 9 2 Structure and Stability of non-magnetic White Dwarfs 21 2.1 Introduction . 21 2.2 Structure and Stability of non-rotating non-magnetic white dwarfs 23 2.2.1 Inverse b-decay . 29 2.2.2 General Relativity instability . 31 2.2.3 Mass-radius and mass-central density relations . 32 2.3 Uniformly rotating white dwarfs . 37 2.3.1 The Mass-shedding limit . 38 2.3.2 Secular Instability in rotating and general relativistic con- figurations . 38 2.3.3 Pycnonuclear Reactions . 39 2.3.4 Mass-radius and mass-central density relations . 41 3 Magnetic white dwarfs: Stability and observations 47 3.1 Introduction . 47 3.2 Observations of magnetic white dwarfs . 49 3.2.1 Introduction . 49 3.2.2 Historical background . 51 3.2.3 Mass distribution of magnetic white dwarfs . 53 3.2.4 Spin periods of isolated magnetic white dwarfs . 53 3.2.5 The origin of the magnetic field . 55 3.2.6 Applications . 56 3.2.7 Conclusions . 57 3.3 Stability of Magnetic White Dwarfs . 59 3.3.1 Introduction . 59 3.3.2 Ultra-magnetic white dwarfs . 60 3.3.3 Equation of state and virial theorem violation .
  • The Core Helium Flash Revisited

    The Core Helium Flash Revisited

    A&A 520, A114 (2010) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014461 & c ESO 2010 Astrophysics The core helium flash revisited III. From Population I to Population III stars M. Mocák1,S.W.Campbell2,3,E.Müller4, and K. Kifonidis4 1 Institut d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 226, 1050 Brussels, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departament de Física i Enginyeria Nuclear, EUETIB, Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, C./Comte d’Urgell 187, 08036 Barcelona, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 3 Centre for Stellar and Planetary Astrophysics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia 4 Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Postfach 1312, 85741 Garching, Germany Received 18 March 2010 / Accepted 13 June 2010 ABSTRACT Context. Degenerate ignition of helium in low-mass stars at the end of the red giant branch phase leads to dynamic convection in their helium cores. One-dimensional (1D) stellar modeling of this intrinsically multi-dimensional dynamic event is likely to be inadequate. Previous hydrodynamic simulations imply that the single convection zone in the helium core of metal-rich Pop I stars grows during the flash on a dynamic timescale. This may lead to hydrogen injection into the core and to a double convection zone structure as known from one-dimensional core helium flash simulations of low-mass Pop III stars. Aims. We perform hydrodynamic simulations of the core helium flash in two and three dimensions to better constrain the nature of these events. To this end we study the hydrodynamics of convection within the helium cores of a 1.25 M metal-rich Pop I star (Z = 0.02), and, for the first time, a 0.85 M metal-free Pop III star (Z = 0) near the peak of the flash.
  • Gamma Ray Bursts, Their Afterglows, and Soft Gamma Repeaters

    Gamma Ray Bursts, Their Afterglows, and Soft Gamma Repeaters

    Gamma ray bursts, their afterglows, . and soft gamma repeaters G.S.Bisnovatyi-Kogan IKI RAS, Moscow GRB Workshop 2012 Moscow University June 14 Estimations Central GRB machne Afterglow SGR Nuclear model of SGR Neutron stars are the result of collapse . Conservation of the magnetic flux 2 B(ns)=B(s) (Rs /Rns ) B(s)=10 – 100 Gs, R ~ (3 – 10) R( Sun ), R =10 km s ns B(ns) = 4 10 11– 5 10 13 Gs Ginzburg (1964) Radiopulsars E = AB2 Ω 4 - magnetic dipole radiation (pulsar wind) 2 E = 0.5 I Ω I – moment of inertia of the neutron star 2 B = IPP/4 π A Single radiopulsars – timing observations (the most rapid ones are connected with young supernovae remnants) 11 13 B(ns) = 2 10 – 5 10 Gs Neutron star formation N.V.Ardeljan, G.S.Bisnovatyi-Kogan, S.G.Moiseenko MNRAS, 4E+51 Ekinpol 2005, 359 , 333 . E 3.5E+51 rot Emagpol Emagtor 3E+51 2.5E+51 2E+51 B(chaotic) ~ 10^14 Gs 1.5E+51 1E+51 High residual chaotic 5E+50 magnetic field after MRE core collapse SN explosion. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Heat production during time,sec Ohmic damping of the chaotic magnetic field may influence NS cooling light curve Inner region: development of magnetorotational instability (MRI) TIME= 34.83616590 ( 1.20326837sec ) TIME= 35.08302173 ( 1.21179496sec ) 0 .0 1 4 0 .0 1 4 0 .0 1 3 0 .0 1 3 0 .0 1 2 0 .0 1 2 0 .0 1 1 0 .0 1 1 0 .0 1 0 .0 1 0 .0 0 9 0 .0 0 9 Z 0 .0 0 8 0Z .0 0 8 0 .0 0 7 0 .0 0 7 0 .0 0 6 0 .0 0 6 0 .0 0 5 0 .0 0 5 0 .0 0 4 0 .0 0 4 0 .0 0 3 0 .0 0 3 0 .0 0 2 0 .0 0 2 0 .0 1 0 .0 1 5 0 .0 2 0 .0 1 0 .0 1 5 0 .0 2 R R TIME= 35.26651529 ( 1.21813298sec ) TIME=
  • Announcements

    Announcements

    Announcements • Next Session – Stellar evolution • Low-mass stars • Binaries • High-mass stars – Supernovae – Synthesis of the elements • Note: Thursday Nov 11 is a campus holiday Red Giant 8 100Ro 10 years L 10 3Ro, 10 years Temperature Red Giant Hydrogen fusion shell Contracting helium core Electron Degeneracy • Pauli Exclusion Principle says that you can only have two electrons per unit 6-D phase- space volume in a gas. DxDyDzDpxDpyDpz † Red Giants • RG Helium core is support against gravity by electron degeneracy • Electron-degenerate gases do not expand with increasing temperature (no thermostat) • As the Temperature gets to 100 x 106K the “triple-alpha” process (Helium fusion to Carbon) can happen. Helium fusion/flash Helium fusion requires two steps: He4 + He4 -> Be8 Be8 + He4 -> C12 The Berylium falls apart in 10-6 seconds so you need not only high enough T to overcome the electric forces, you also need very high density. Helium Flash • The Temp and Density get high enough for the triple-alpha reaction as a star approaches the tip of the RGB. • Because the core is supported by electron degeneracy (with no temperature dependence) when the triple-alpha starts, there is no corresponding expansion of the core. So the temperature skyrockets and the fusion rate grows tremendously in the `helium flash’. Helium Flash • The big increase in the core temperature adds momentum phase space and within a couple of hours of the onset of the helium flash, the electrons gas is no longer degenerate and the core settles down into `normal’ helium fusion. • There is little outward sign of the helium flash, but the rearrangment of the core stops the trip up the RGB and the star settles onto the horizontal branch.
  • Stellar Evolution

    Stellar Evolution

    AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 1 of 19 www.accessscience.com Stellar evolution Contributed by: James B. Kaler Publication year: 2014 The large-scale, systematic, and irreversible changes over time of the structure and composition of a star. Types of stars Dozens of different types of stars populate the Milky Way Galaxy. The most common are main-sequence dwarfs like the Sun that fuse hydrogen into helium within their cores (the core of the Sun occupies about half its mass). Dwarfs run the full gamut of stellar masses, from perhaps as much as 200 solar masses (200 M,⊙) down to the minimum of 0.075 solar mass (beneath which the full proton-proton chain does not operate). They occupy the spectral sequence from class O (maximum effective temperature nearly 50,000 K or 90,000◦F, maximum luminosity 5 × 10,6 solar), through classes B, A, F, G, K, and M, to the new class L (2400 K or 3860◦F and under, typical luminosity below 10,−4 solar). Within the main sequence, they break into two broad groups, those under 1.3 solar masses (class F5), whose luminosities derive from the proton-proton chain, and higher-mass stars that are supported principally by the carbon cycle. Below the end of the main sequence (masses less than 0.075 M,⊙) lie the brown dwarfs that occupy half of class L and all of class T (the latter under 1400 K or 2060◦F). These shine both from gravitational energy and from fusion of their natural deuterium. Their low-mass limit is unknown.
  • Mission Design Concept

    Mission Design Concept

    AXTAR: mission design concept Paul S. Raya, Deepto Chakrabartyb, Colleen A. Wilson-Hodgec, Bernard F. Phlipsa, Ronald A. Remillardb, Alan M. Levineb, Kent S. Wooda, Michael T. Wolffa, Chul S. Gwona, Tod E. Strohmayerd, Michael Baysingere, Michael S. Briggsc, Peter Capizzoe, Leo Fabisinskie, Randall C. Hopkinse, Linda S. Hornsbye, Les Johnsone, C. Dauphne Maplese, Janie H. Miernike, Dan Thomase, Gianluigi De Geronimof aSpace Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA bKavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA cSpace Science Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812, USA dNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA eAdvanced Concepts Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812, USA fInstrumentation Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA ABSTRACT The Advanced X-ray Timing Array (AXTAR) is a mission concept for X-ray timing of compact objects that combines very large collecting area, broadband spectral coverage, high time resolution, highly flexible scheduling, and an ability to respond promptly to time-critical targets of opportunity. It is optimized for submillisecond timing of bright Galactic X-ray sources in order to study phenomena at the natural time scales of neutron star surfaces and black hole event horizons, thus probing the physics of ultradense matter, strongly curved spacetimes, and intense magnetic fields. AXTAR’s main instrument, the Large Area Timing Array (LATA) is a collimated instrument with 2–50 keV coverage and over 3 square meters effective area. The LATA is made up of an array of supermodules that house 2-mm thick silicon pixel detectors.
  • Today's Outline

    Today's Outline

    Today's outline Review High and low mass Low-mass Stars Summary of evolution Main sequence Hydrogen Exhaustion Review: Clusters, Birth of Stars Giant phase Helium flash Horizontal Branch Evolution of low mass stars Helium Exhaustion Planetary Nebula I Low and high mass stars Summary again I Interior of a giant star I Phases of burning I White dwarf formation Review High and low mass Low-mass Stars Summary of evolution Main sequence Evolution of low mass stars Hydrogen Exhaustion Giant phase I Low and high mass stars Helium flash Horizontal Branch Helium Exhaustion I Interior of a giant star Planetary Nebula Summary again I Phases of burning I White dwarf formation Reference stars Low Mass: Review I Sun - low-mass "dwarf" High and low mass Low-mass Stars I Vega - low-mass "dwarf" Summary of evolution Main sequence I Sirius - low-mass "dwarf" Hydrogen Exhaustion Giant phase Helium flash I Arcturus - low-mass giant Horizontal Branch Helium Exhaustion I Sirius B - white dwarf (very small) Planetary Nebula Summary again High Mass: I Rigil - high-mass (blue) giant I Betelgeuse - high-mass (red) giant High and low mass stars Black hole Review "high−mass" High and low mass Low-mass Stars (hydrogen burning) Neutron Star Summary of evolution Main Sequence Main sequence 8 Hydrogen Exhaustion Giants Giant phase Protostar Helium flash Horizontal Branch "low−mass" Helium Exhaustion Planetary Nebula 2 White dwarf Summary again Birth Mass Time Stars generally classified by their end-of-life I Low mass { form white dwarf stars, no supernova I High mass { form
  • Astronomy 103 Exam 2 Review

    Astronomy 103 Exam 2 Review

    Astronomy 103 Exam 2 Review Spring 2009 Which star is hoer, a G4 main sequence star or a G4 giant? A. The main sequence star B. The giant C. Both have the same temperature D. Cannot be determined from informaon given Which star is hoer, a G4 main sequence star or a G4 giant? A. The main sequence star B. The giant C. Both have the same temperature D. Cannot be determined from informaon given What would be an immediate indicator the Sun had stopped fusing hydrogen? A. The light we see would shi wavelengths into the ultraviolet. B. The Sun would blow off its outer layers as a planetary nebula. C. Solar observatories would see that the Sun’s core was rapidly shrinking. D. The amount of neutrinos observed from the Sun would suddenly change. What would be an immediate indicator the Sun had stopped fusing hydrogen? A. The light we see would shi wavelengths into the ultraviolet. B. The Sun would blow off its outer layers as a planetary nebula. C. Solar observatories would see that the Sun’s core was rapidly shrinking. D. The amount of neutrinos observed from the Sun would suddenly change. A helium flash: A. Occurs to all stars B. Occurs only if the star’s core is degenerate C. Creates a planetary nebula D. None of the above A helium flash: A. Occurs to all stars B. Occurs only if the star’s core is degenerate C. Creates a planetary nebula D. None of the above The main sequence is: A. The most stable phase of a star’s life B.