DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterbird and Aquatic Invertebrate Survey for the Beyondie Potash Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterbird and Aquatic Invertebrate Survey for the Beyondie Potash Project Waterbird and aquatic invertebrate survey for the Beyondie Potash Project Prepared for Kalium Lakes Ltd March 2017 Final Report Waterbird and aquatic invertebrate survey for the Beyondie Potash Project Prepared for Kalium Lakes Ltd Waterbird and aquatic invertebrate survey for the Beyondie Potash Project Prepared for Kalium Lakes Ltd Final Report Author/s: Anna Leung, Volker Framenau Reviewer/s: Karen Crews Date: 31 March 2017 Submitted to: Brett Hazelden Chain of authorship and review Name Task Version Date V.W. Framenau Draft for client comments 1.0 31 March 2017 Choose an item. ©Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2017 The use of this report is solely for the Client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this report may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or the Client. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Rd BALCATTA WA 6021 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 1063-TM-KAL-ECO Waterbird and aquatic invertebrate survey of the Beyondie Potash Project Prepared for Kalium Lakes Ltd Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... IV 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Survey objectives and scope of works .................................................................................... 8 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Commonwealth ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 State ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia ............................................................. 11 3.2 Land systems ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Hydrology and geomorphology ............................................................................................ 15 3.4 Climate and weather ............................................................................................................. 15 3.5 Land use ................................................................................................................................ 17 3.5.1 Threatening processes .................................................................................................. 1 7 3.5.2 Reserves ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.6 Biological context .................................................................................................................. 17 3.6.1 Waterbirds .................................................................................................................... 18 3.6.2 Aquatic macro-invertebrates and zooplankton ............................................................ 19 4 METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Desktop review ..................................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Database searches and literature review ..................................................................... 20 4.2 Field survey ........................................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Timing and survey effort ............................................................................................... 2 1 4.2.2 Sites selection and habitat characterisation ................................................................. 21 4.2.3 Water quality ................................................................................................................ 23 4.2.4 Waterbirds .................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.5 Aquatic invertebrates.................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Taxonomy and nomenclature ............................................................................................... 24 4.3.1 Morphological species identification ............................................................................ 24 4.3.2 Molecular species identification ................................................................................... 24 4.3.3 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 24 4.4 Statistical analyses ................................................................................................................ 25 4.4.1 Water quality ................................................................................................................ 25 4.4.2 Species richness ............................................................................................................ 25 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Waterbird and aquatic invertebrate survey of the Beyondie Potash Project Prepared for Kalium Lakes Ltd 4.4.3 Water quality and invertebrate communities .............................................................. 26 4.5 Survey personnel .................................................................................................................. 26 5 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 27 5.1 Desktop review ..................................................................................................................... 27 5.1.1 Waterbirds .................................................................................................................... 27 5.1.2 Aquatic invertebrates.................................................................................................... 27 5.2 Field survey ........................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.1 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.2 Water quality ................................................................................................................ 30 5.2.3 Waterbirds .................................................................................................................... 31 5.2.4 Aquatic invertebrates.................................................................................................... 33 5.2.5 Arachnida (spiders and allies) ....................................................................................... 44 5.2.6 Crustacea (crabs and allies) .......................................................................................... 44 5.2.7 Insecta (insects)............................................................................................................. 46 5.2.8 Gastropoda (snails) ....................................................................................................... 46 5.2.9 Oligochaeta (aquatic worms) ........................................................................................ 47 5.2.10 Species richness ............................................................................................................ 47 5.3 Survey limitations ................................................................................................................. 50 6 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................... 51 6.1 Water quality ........................................................................................................................ 51 6.2 Waterbirds ............................................................................................................................ 52 6.3 Aquatic invertebrates ........................................................................................................... 52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) Inferred from Nuclear 18S Ribosomal DNA (18S Rdna) Sequences
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25 (2002) 535–544 www.academicpress.com Phylogenetic analysis of anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) inferred from nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) sequences Peter H.H. Weekers,a,* Gopal Murugan,a,1 Jacques R. Vanfleteren,a Denton Belk,b and Henri J. Dumonta a Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium b Biology Department, Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78207, USA Received 20 February 2001; received in revised form 18 June 2002 Abstract The nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA) of 27 anostracans (Branchiopoda: Anostraca) belonging to 14 genera and eight out of nine traditionally recognized families has been sequenced and used for phylogenetic analysis. The 18S rDNA phylogeny shows that the anostracans are monophyletic. The taxa under examination form two clades of subordinal level and eight clades of family level. Two families the Polyartemiidae and Linderiellidae are suppressed and merged with the Chirocephalidae, of which together they form a subfamily. In contrast, the Parartemiinae are removed from the Branchipodidae, raised to family level (Parartemiidae) and cluster as a sister group to the Artemiidae in a clade defined here as the Artemiina (new suborder). A number of morphological traits support this new suborder. The Branchipodidae are separated into two families, the Branchipodidae and Ta- nymastigidae (new family). The relationship between Dendrocephalus and Thamnocephalus requires further study and needs the addition of Branchinella sequences to decide whether the Thamnocephalidae are monophyletic. Surprisingly, Polyartemiella hazeni and Polyartemia forcipata (‘‘Family’’ Polyartemiidae), with 17 and 19 thoracic segments and pairs of trunk limb as opposed to all other anostracans with only 11 pairs, do not cluster but are separated by Linderiella santarosae (‘‘Family’’ Linderiellidae), which has 11 pairs of trunk limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 10-2: Arthropods: Crustacea
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Arthropods: Crustacea – Ostracoda and Amphipoda. Chapt. 10-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 10-2-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 10-2 ARTHROPODS: CRUSTACEA – OSTRACODA AND AMPHPODA TABLE OF CONTENTS CLASS OSTRACODA ..................................................................................................................................... 10-2-2 Adaptations ................................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Swimming to Crawling ....................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Reproduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Habitats ...................................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Terrestrial ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Peat Bogs ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-4 Aquatic ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 15 International Symposium on Ostracoda
    Berliner paläobiologische Abhandlungen 1-160 6 Berlin 2005 15th International Symposium on Ostracoda In Memory of Friedrich-Franz Helmdach (1935-1994) Freie Universität Berlin September 12-15, 2005 Abstract Volume (edited by Rolf Kohring and Benjamin Sames) 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preface The 15th International Symposium on Ostracoda takes place in Berlin in September 2005, hosted by the Institute of Geological Sciences of the Freie Universität Berlin. This is the second time that the International Symposium on Ostracoda has been held in Germany, following the 5th International Symposium in Hamburg in 1974. The relative importance of Ostracodology - the science that studies Ostracoda - in Germany is further highlighted by well-known names such as G.W. Müller, Klie, Triebel and Helmdach, and others who stand for the long tradition of research on Ostracoda in Germany. During our symposium in Berlin more than 150 participants from 36 countries will meet to discuss all aspects of living and fossil Ostracoda. We hope that the scientific communities working on the biology and palaeontology of Ostracoda will benefit from interesting talks and inspiring discussions - in accordance with the symposium's theme: Ostracodology - linking bio- and geosciences We wish every participant a successful symposium and a pleasant stay in Berlin Berlin, July 27th 2005 Michael Schudack and Steffen Mischke CONTENT Schudack, M. and Mischke, S.: Preface
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Polystyrene Microspheres Abundance on Development and Feeding Behavior of Artemia Salina
    applied sciences Article The Influence of Polystyrene Microspheres Abundance on Development and Feeding Behavior of Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758) Marco Albano 1 , Giuseppe Panarello 1, Davide Di Paola 1 , Fabiano Capparucci 1 , Rosalia Crupi 2 , Enrico Gugliandolo 2,* , Nunziacarla Spanò 3,4,* , Gioele Capillo 2,4 and Serena Savoca 1 1 Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (G.P.); [email protected] (D.D.P.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (S.S.) 2 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy; [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (G.C.) 3 Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy 4 Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), 98122 Messina, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.G.); [email protected] (N.S.) Abstract: In the present study, it has been evaluated how 10 µm of polyethylene microspheres can be ingested by Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758) larvae within the first 7 days of the life cycle, and the Citation: Albano, M.; Panarello, G.; impact on their health. Twelve A. salina larvae (instar I) groups were exposed to different microplas- Di Paola, D.; Capparucci, F.; Crupi, R.; tics (MPs) concentrations (0-1-10-102-103-104 MPs/mL), with and without Dunaliella salina as a food Gugliandolo, E.; Spanò, N.; Capillo, source. The results highlighted that A. salina larvae ingest MPs in relation to the exposure times in a G.; Savoca, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Identification Guide to the Fairy Shrimps (Crustacea: Anostraca: Anostracina) of Australia
    Museum Victoria Science Reports 19: 1-44 (2015) ISSN 1833-0290 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mvsr.2015.19 A revised identification guide to the fairy shrimps (Crustacea: Anostraca: Anostracina) of Australia BRIAN V. TIMMS 1,2 1 Honorary Research Associate, Australian Museum, 6-9 College St., Sydney, 2000, NSW. 2 Visiting Professorial Fellow, Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052. Abstract Timms, B.V. 2015. A revised identification guide to the fairy shrimps (Crustacea: Anostraca: Anostracina) of Australia. Museum Victoria Science Reports 19: 1–44. Following an introduction to the anatomy and ecology of fairy shrimps living in Australian fresh waters, identification keys are provided for males of two species of Australobranchipus, one species of Streptocephalus and 39 f species o Branchinella. o A key t females of the three genera is also provided, though identification to species is not always possible. Keywords Australobranchipus, Branchinella, Streptocephalus, distributions Index (Notostraca, Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cyclestherida (last three o used t be the Conchostraca) and Cladocera) that they Introduction 2 are placed within their own subclass, the Sarsostraca. Classification and Taxonomic Features 2 Anostracans are divided into two suborders: the Artemiina Biology of Fairy Shrimps 5 containing two genera Artemia and Parartemia and which live Collection and Preservation 6 in saline waters and hence are called brine shrimps (Timms, Key to Families 7 2012), and the Anostracina which accommodate the freshwater Family Branchiopodidae 10 fairy shrimps (though some live in saline waters) arranged in Family Streptocephalidae 12 six extant families.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea, Ostracoda)
    First record and detailed description of the male of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) Turk J Zool 2012; 36(4): 484-495 © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1012-78 First record and detailed description of the male of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) Necmettin SARI1, Okan KÜLKÖYLÜOĞLU1,2,*, Derya AKDEMİR3 1Abant İzzet Baysal University, Department of Biology No.18, Gölköy 14280 Bolu - TURKEY 2Abant İzzet Baysal University, Department of Biology, Hydrobiology Section No.18, 14280 Gölköy, Bolu - TURKEY 3Marmara University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Biology, 34722, İstanbul - TURKEY Received: 30.12.2010 Abstract: Bisexual populations of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 were reported for the fi rst time from 5 diff erent aquatic bodies in Bolu and Erzincan (Turkey). Th e males were compared with the males of the other 11 species of the genus Ilyocypris (I. australiensis, I. biplicata, I. decipiens, I. dentifera, I. divisa, I. fallax, I. getica, I. gibba, I. lacustris, I. mongolica, and I. monstrifi ca) and described based on examinations of the soft body parts (e.g., hemipenis, legs, clasping organs) and valves. Ecological characteristics of habitats where the bisexual populations found were discussed for future studies. Key words: Taxonomy, morphology, bisexual population, distribution, Anatolia Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) erkeğinin ilk kez rapor edilişi ve detaylı tanımlanması Özet: Ilyocypris inermis’in Kaufmann, 1900 biseksüel populasyonu Bolu ve Erzincan’daki (Türkiye) beş farklı sucul ortamdan ilk kez kayıt edilmiştir. Erkekler bu cinse ait erkekleri olan diğer 11 türle (I. australiensis, I. biplicata, I. decipiens, I. dentifera, I. divisa, I.
    [Show full text]
  • Etymology of the Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) Named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online Etymology of the Dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. IAN D. ENDERSBY 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Vic 3094 ([email protected]) Published on 23 April 2012 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN Endersby, I.D. (2012). Etymology of the dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 134, 1-16. R.J. Tillyard described 26 genera and 130 specifi c or subspecifi c taxa of dragonfl ies from the Australasian region. The etymology of the scientifi c name of each of these is given or deduced. Manuscript received 11 December 2011, accepted for publication 16 April 2012. KEYWORDS: Australasia, Dragonfl ies, Etymology, Odonata, Tillyard. INTRODUCTION moved to another genus while 16 (12%) have fallen into junior synonymy. Twelve (9%) of his subspecies Given a few taxonomic and distributional have been raised to full species status and two species uncertainties, the odonate fauna of Australia comprises have been relegated to subspecifi c status. Of the 325 species in 113 genera (Theischinger and Endersby eleven subspecies, or varieties or races as Tillyard 2009). The discovery and naming of these dragonfl ies sometimes called them, not accounted for above, fi ve falls roughly into three discrete time periods (Table 1). are still recognised, albeit four in different genera, During the fi rst of these, all Australian Odonata were two are no longer considered as distinct subspecies, referred to European experts, while the second era and four have disappeared from the modern literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographing and Identifying Dragonflies in Central Victoria Reiner Richter
    Photographing and Identifying Dragonflies in Central Victoria Reiner Richter http://rnr.id.au Notes from the presentation for the Bendigo Field Naturalists Club, August 2014. Introduction I had always enjoyed photography, had a disposable camera as a child and took photography classes in high school. It wasn't until I got my first digital camera in late 2001 that I started taking lots of photos. I photograph anything in nature that I find interesting, including dragonflies, which is what I'll be covering here. These days I take mostly macro photos. In the beginning I wasn't trying to identify much but after several years came in contact with a few people over the internet that had an interest in Victorian dragonflies in particular and they helped me out. It was good to start in a reduced region with limited species rather than, for example, having to sift through more than 300 species found throughout Australia. It however still took me another 5 years before I started confidently being able to identify most of Victoria's 75 or so species. In this presentation I will discuss how I go about chasing them and detail some species found in central Victoria. Photographing Odonata Usually the first dragonfly I encounter each season is Diplacodes bipunctata (Wanderin percher), often while out looking at wildflowers in central Victoria in spring. Photographing dragonflies is a lot easier when the insect is perched so this species is quite accommodating. I almost always take photos free-hand as stalking small animals with a tripod is just too impracticle.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Conservation of the Unique and Diverse Halophilic Macroinvertebrates of Australian Salt Lakes
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research Corrigendum https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21088_CO Biology and conservation of the unique and diverse halophilic macroinvertebrates of Australian salt lakes Angus D’Arcy Lawrie, Jennifer Chaplin and Adrian Pinder Marine and Freshwater Research. [Published online 2 July 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21088 The authors of the above-mentioned paper regret to inform readers that there were errors published in the systematics of one of the taxa in the manuscript. The list of groups in the Cladocera section (on p. F) was published as below: The bulk of Cladocera that occur in inland waters in Australia are restricted to fresh water, but three groups have representatives in salt lakes. These groups comprise: (1) six species of Daphniopsis (or Daphnia; see below); (2) two species of Daphnia (Daphnia salinifera Hebert and Daphnia neosalinifera Hebert) from the Daphnia carinata (King) subgenus; and (3) three species of chydorid: Moina baylyi Forro´, Moina mongolica Daday and Extremalona timmsi Sinev & Shiel. This text should have been as below (changes underlined): The bulk of Cladocera that occur in inland waters in Australia are restricted to fresh water, but four groups have representatives in salt lakes. These groups comprise: (1) six species of Daphniopsis (or Daphnia; see below); (2) two species of Daphnia (Daphnia salinifera Hebert and Daphnia neosalinifera Hebert) from the Daphnia carinata (King) subgenus; (3) two Moina species (Moina baylyi Forro´ and Moina mongolica Daday); and (4) one species of chydorid (Extremalona timmsi Sinev & Shiel). Furthermore, the title of the Chydorids section should have been titled Moinids and chydorids.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Australian the to Guide Identification
    Identification Guide to theAustralian Odonata www.environment.nsw.gov.au Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data Theischinger, G. (Gunther), 1940– Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata 1. Odonata – Australia. 2. Odonata – Australia – Identification. I. Endersby I. (Ian), 1941- . II. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW © 2009 Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Front cover: Petalura gigantea, male (photo R. Tuft) Prepared by: Gunther Theischinger, Waters and Catchments Science, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW and Ian Endersby, 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Victoria 3094 Published by: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131555 (information & publication requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. ISBN 978 1 74232 475 3 DECCW 2009/730 December 2009 Printed using environmentally sustainable paper. Contents About this guide iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Systematics
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea: Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cyclestherida) of Australia, Including a Description of a New Species of Eocyzicus
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2005 Records of the Australian Museum (2005) Vol. 57: 341–354. ISSN 0067-1975 A List of the Recent Clam Shrimps (Crustacea: Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cyclestherida) of Australia, Including a Description of a New Species of Eocyzicus STEFAN RICHTER*1 & BRIAN V. T IMMS2 1 Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Erbertstr. 1, 07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] 2 Research Associate, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. Since 1855, 28 species of clam shrimps (Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cyclestherida) have been described from Australia, although three have been synonymized. One new species of Eocyzicus is described herein. It has a distinctive rostrum that is slightly different in male and females and the clasper has a three segmented palp. With this new species the Australian fauna comprises 26 valid species of clam shrimps. We provide a list of all described species, including their known localities and a key to the genera of Australian clam shrimps. RICHTER, STEFAN, & BRIAN V. T IMMS, 2005. A list of the Recent clam shrimps (Crustacea: Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cyclestherida) of Australia, including a description of a new species of Eocyzicus. Records of the Australian Museum 57(3): 341–354. Large branchiopods are an important element of Australia’s McMaster et al., in press). Recently, the presence of temporary inland waters. Knowledge about the taxonomy Streptocephalus in Australia was confirmed with the of the three large branchiopod groups differs, however. description of a new species and the detection of others Among the Notostraca, both known genera, Lepidurus and (Herbert & Timms, 2000; Timms, 2004).
    [Show full text]