DOCSLIB.ORG

Simi Valley General Plan Update Community Profile 1 Community Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simi Valley General Plan Update Community Profile 1 Community Development City of Simi Valley General Plan Update Community Profile Summary of the General Plan Technical Background Report September 2007 09057 | JCS | 07 www.ci.simi-valley.ca.us COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Demographics Population in the City of Simi Valley grew from persons per household actually increased slightly to 59,832 in 1970 to 122,708 in 2006, at an average 3.06 according to DOF. annual rate of 2.0 percent over this period. The Based on growth forecasts provided by City Staff, the average annual population and household growth population in the City is projected to grow from rates from 1970 through 2006 were 2.0 percent and 121,204 in 2005 to 135,869 in 2035 at 0.4 percent 2.9 percent, respectively, declining to 1.6 percent and annual average growth rate, while households are 1.5 percent, respectively, for the 2000 to 2006 forecast to grow from 39,225 in 2005 to 43,815 in period. 2035 at 0.4 percent annual average growth rate. From 1990 to 2000, population in the 35 to 64 years The persons-per-household ratio in the City is age group grew from 37 percent of the total currently forecast by City Staff to stay constant at population in 1990 to about 42 percent in 2000. In 3.09 from 2005 to 2035. contrast, the population in the age group 18 to 35 The levels of educational attainment in 2000 were years, declined from about 30 percent to 22 percent similar in the City and the County with more than over this same period. 60 percent or more of the population aged 25 years The senior population in the 65 and over group grew and over having some college education or higher. from 5.3 percent of the population in 1990 to 7.6 The City had a labor-force of approximately 57,000 percent in 2000. residents in 2000, with the largest percent employed Average household size in Simi Valley declined from in the Management and Professional occupations 4.15 in 1970 to 3.04 in 2000. From 2000 to 2006, the (38.2 percent) followed by Sales and Office occupations (30.7 percent). Land Use and Urban Form With its valley setting, Mediterranean climate, and There are approximately 42 square miles of land area rolling hills, Simi Valley is situated in an attractive and in the City with older development generally located unique setting. The surrounding hills are a significant in the historic valley floor areas, and more recent natural feature that physically separates the City from development located in the outlying areas. neighboring jurisdictions and enhances its community There is a continuous pattern of suburban identity. development on the valley floor characterized by one Distinctive features that characterize the City’s form and two-story buildings, schools, shopping centers, are the Ronald Reagan Freeway (SR-118), which housing, office, and industrial centers interspersed transects Simi Valley north of its center, the Arroyo with parks and community facilities. Commercial Simi and adjacent open space areas, the Southern activities are concentrated along Tapo Canyon Road, Pacific Railroad which transects the City south of Tapo Street, Cochran Street and Los Angeles SR-118, and the expanses of hillsides and canyons Avenue, with business parks and industrial uses that surround the City on all sides. located west of First Street along Easy Street and the railroad, or generally south of Los Angeles Avenue SIMI VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE COMMUNITY PROFILE 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and Tapo Street and Tapo Canyon Road. The Simi as a Project Area. Redevelopment Project Areas Valley Town Center, a regional shopping center, is allow the Agency to eliminate blighted conditions located north of the Ronald Reagan Freeway between through the use of redevelopment tools and Erringer Road and First Street. development incentives. The most common urban forms found in Simi Valley Tools used by the City to limit the location, amount are as follows: and design of development include the Simi Valley ■ Residential: Large lot, traditional suburban, master Growth Management Plan which is designed to planned communities, and mixed density maintain compliance with the Ventura County Air ■ Commercial: Corridor commercial (non-pedestrian Quality Management Plan; the Simi Valley City Urban oriented commercial or strip commercial); Restriction Boundary to protect existing agricultural, Neighborhood Centers or corner retail center; or open space, viewsheds, wildlife areas, and watershed Regional Centers (Town Center or Big Box) land from the impacts of development; and the Hillside Performance Standards designed to preserve ■ Industrial: Light industrial or business park and respect the natural topographic features of the The City’s existing land uses fall into six major land hillsides surrounding the City. uses. These uses as a percentage of the total land As the City continues to grow and the remaining area within Simi Valley are as follows: Residential vacant land is developed, there must be critical (29%), Open Space other than parks (41%), analysis of what land uses will be allowed in the Commercial (3%), Industrial (2%), Public/Semi-Public future, where development will occur and in what which includes schools, public buildings, religious amounts, and what it will look like in order to achieve facilities, parks, etc. (8%), and Other which includes the community’s Vision. agriculture, infrastructure, land fill, vacant, etc. (16%). There is a limited amount of vacant land in the City Retail, administrative, professional, and service (2% included in Other). commercial uses are located throughout the community and account for approximately 3 percent The City’s General Plan land use designations and its of the total land uses. Commercial areas in Simi major zoning categories generally correspond to its Valley include commercial corridors (e.g., Los existing land uses and are summarized as follows: Angeles Avenue, Cochran Street, Tapo Canyon Road, Residential ( 35%), Open Space (35%), Commercial etc.), commercial strip centers, corner retail centers, (3%), Industrial (5%), Public and Semi-Public (7%), and neighborhood shopping centers, and regional retail Other (12%). centers (e.g., Simi Valley Town Center). The Simi Valley Community Development Agency has designated a limited amount of property in the City Economics Based on employment data from the California in manufacturing, professional, scientific and technical, Employment Development Department (EDD), the and information-related activities. City’s employment base grew from 33,625 in 2001 to The City had a significantly lower average payroll 36,959 in 2005 at an annual average growth rate of wage ($38,969) in 2005 compared to the South East 2.4 percent. Ventura sub-region ($55,478) due to the higher The City’s economic base is more specialized in retail proportion of jobs in low paying job categories and office—especially managerial and finance and (almost 25 percent in retail and accommodation and insurance activities, relative to Ventura County but food services). less specialized relative to South East Ventura County 2 SIMI VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE COMMUNITY PROFILE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Preliminary employment growth forecasts from the Thousand Oaks, San Buenaventura, and Camarillo at Southern California Association of Governments $17,760, $16,795 and $12,657, respectively. (SCAG) RTP 2007 shows City employment growing Simi Valley was performing close or better in 2005 from 43,163 in 2005 to 65,964 in 2035 at 1.4 percent. than the Ventura County per capita average in This is faster than the household growth forecasts General Merchandise, Service Stations, Food Stores provided by City Staff at 0.4 percent over the 2005 to and Eating and Drinking Places, but less-than-average 2035 forecast period. If this growth in jobs and in Apparel Stores, Home Furnishings & Appliances, households is realized, the jobs per household ratio Auto Dealers & Auto Supplies. would increase from 1.10 in 2005 to 1.51 in 2035. However, the 2005 retail sales estimates for the City Based on information from the California State Board do not include the effects of the Simi Valley Regional of Equalization, per capita taxable retail sales estimate Town Center, especially in retail categories like in the City was $10,513 in 2005 (in constant 2006 General Merchandise, Apparel, Eating and Drinking dollars), lower compared to Ventura County at and Specialty Retail. $11,293, and other Ventura County cities like Housing Simi Valley’s housing stock increased 11.5 percent The City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation from 2000 to 2007. This level of growth outpaced the (RHNA) is 3,383 for the time period of 2006 to 2014. countywide growth of 8.9 percent. The City’s Growth Management Plan will provide a sufficient number of permits to meet the RHNA The majority (82 percent) of the City’s housing stock requirements of 3,383 units. is comprised of single-family homes, with the remaining 18 percent being multi-family units and Simi Valley has an active housing production market. mobile homes. Countywide, single-family homes As of June 2007, there were a number of residential comprise about 75 percent of the total housing stock. projects either under construction or in the development pipeline. Based on housing prices and salary surveys, certain occupations (e.g., service employees, health care There are potential opportunities for new housing in workers, and school teachers) have difficulty affording infill areas that are currently under-utilized and housing in Simi Valley. To afford a median priced through the use of transferable development rights. single-family home of $540,000, an annual salary of close to $150,000 would be needed. This salary level is almost double that of the median salary of professionals, such as civil engineers (almost $79,000). The affordability gap is even more severe among service employees.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simi Valley General Plan Update Technical Background Report 5-1 Chapter 5 Circulation
    CHAPTER 5 Circulation 5.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the existing transportation conditions in the planning area. The chapter addresses multi-modal transportation elements including conditions of the City’s local roadway system, transit system, bicycle paths, and goods movement infrastructure. The City of Simi Valley is served by various transportation facilities, including one regional freeway (State Route 118), one freight/commuter rail line, an extensive roadway network, and several bus transit lines. 5.2 EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM 5.2.1 Regional Access State Route 118 (SR-118) provides regional access to the City. The facility has three general purpose lanes in each direction and is currently being widened from six to eight lanes, from Tapo Canyon Road to the Los Angeles County line. The freeway carries between 80,000 and 135,000 daily trips in Simi Valley, generally increasing from west to east. There are eight full-access interchanges on SR-118 within the City. These interchanges are Madera Road; First Street; Erringer Road; Sycamore Drive; Tapo Canyon Road; Stearns Street; Yosemite Avenue; and Kuehner Drive. 5.2.2 Functional Roadway Classifications The existing regional and local roadway network in Simi Valley is a hierarchical system of highways and local streets developed to provide regional traffic movement and local access. The following section provides a description of the functional classification of the facilities within the planning area. Figure 5-1 (Cross Sections) depicts typical cross sections for all of the roadway classifications. The street classifications for the major facilities in the planning area are shown on Figure 5-2 (Functional Street Classifications).
    [Show full text]
  • Three Chumash-Style Pictograph Sites in Fernandeño Territory
    THREE CHUMASH-STYLE PICTOGRAPH SITES IN FERNANDEÑO TERRITORY ALBERT KNIGHT SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have an elaborate polychrome pictograph component. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and major midden deposits that are rich in artifacts also characterize these three sites. One of these sites, the “Burro Flats” site, has the most colorful, elaborate, and well-preserved pictographs in the region south of the Santa Clara River and west of the Los Angeles Basin and the San Fernando Valley. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Coastal Chumash and Fernandeño. The style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN-1072, VEN-149, and LAN-357) is clearly the same as that found in Chumash territory. If the quantity and the quality of rock art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial sites for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction. This article discusses the polychrome rock art at the Burro Flats site (VEN-1072), the Lake Manor site (VEN-148/149), and the Chatsworth site (LAN-357). All three of these sites are located in rock shelters in the eastern Simi Hills. The Simi Hills are mostly located in southeast Ventura County, although the eastern end is in Los Angeles County (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Santa Clara to Sacramento Schedule
    Amtrak Santa Clara To Sacramento Schedule Volatilisable and syzygial Tray interrupts some ginnels so devouringly! Vectorial Merry parbuckles some paramounts and complicating his weft so biannually! Crabwise Cletus discharging her burdens so piecemeal that Westleigh unsnap very unrighteously. The rancho cucamonga metrolink station to sacramento to violence in el paso robles amtrak instead of travel In sacramento to amtrak tips, schedules subject to find a scheduled departure times in. Amtrak can get engine to Sacramento from 165 cities including Los Angeles. Take a mortal at each route we propose that this trip. How business get from Santa Clara to Sacramento by warm or car. Street from santa clara amtrak staff in life for your help you see the schedule. The only even to know my cost for accommodations is negligent either lunar or stock on their website. Er 439 Der S Tue 1 ROL DE Subject all of bill SAN JOAQUIN. Trains on amtrak santa clara to sacramento schedule when i wonder whether this really matters to sacramento? Yosemite Lodge in Yosemite Valley. California to sacramento to clark street. The new Amtrak Viewliner roomettes do not have their own toilet. Track all important calendar dates the candidates and race results for the. California to sacramento, schedules and all scheduled departure times when you decide to get personal information and this? The santa clara and friday evening, eugene or to call is to log in. Metra passengers each week. The sudden death of amtrak santa clara to sacramento schedule on other? Was wondering if you often explain how me howit works when ticket buying for a bedroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles/Orange/Riverside/San Bernardino/Ventura Los Angeles County Cities
    Southern California Regional Energy Network Los Angeles/Orange/Riverside/San Bernardino/Ventura Los Angeles County Cities Alhambra ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Compton ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Canoga Park ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Carson ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Cerritos ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Chatsworth ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Compton ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Culver City ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 El Monte ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas Grossman OSPI Case Number: D11-04-019 Document: Order of Revocation
    RE: Douglas Grossman OSPI Case Number: D11-04-019 Document: Order of Revocation Regarding your request for information about the above-named educator; attached is a true and correct copy of the document on file with the State of Washington, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, Office of Professional Practices. These records are considered certified by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Certain information may have been redacted pursuant to Washington state laws. While those laws require that most records be disclosed on request, they also state that certain information should not be disclosed. The following information has been withheld: None If you have any questions or need additional information regarding the information that was redacted, if any, please contact: OSPI Public Records Office P.O. Box 47200 Olympia, WA 98504-7200 Phone: (360) 725-6372 Email: [email protected] You may appeal the decision to withhold or redact any information by writing to the Superintendent of Public Instruction, OSPI P.O. Box 47200, Olympia, WA 98504-7200. IN THE MATTER OF THE EDUCATION ) CERTIFICATE OF ) OPP No. D11-04-019 ) Douglas Grossman ) FINAL ORDER Certificate No. 475774F ) OF REVOCATION ) COMES NOW the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), under the authority granted by the laws of the state of Washington, having reviewed the file of the above- referenced case, and having considered the entire evidence contained therein, does hereby revoke the Washington Education Certificate, No. 475774F, of Douglas Grossman, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth below: FINDINGS OF FACT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors M a R C H 1 3 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARCH 13, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Robert T. Bartlett Supervisor, 5th District Metro Appointee 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor Metro Board Don Knabe Richard Katz Supervisor, 4th District Metro Appointee County of Los Angeles Metro Board Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board Paul Eaton Alan D. Wapner* Mayor Mayor Pro Tem City of Montclair City of Ontario SANBAG Board SANBAG Board EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS San Diego Association of Governments: [CURRENTLY AWAITING APPOINTMENT] Contact: Linda Culp Principal Planner – Rail Southern California Association of Governments: Art Brown Mayor, City of Buena Park State of California: Ryan Chamberlain Director, Caltrans District 12 Alternate: [CURRENTLY AWAITING APPOINTMENT] *Alternates represent either member Revised 02/27/15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING FRIDAY, MARCH 13, 2015 – 10:00a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research
    UC Berkeley Earlier Faculty Research Title Potential for Improved Intercity Passenger Rail Service in California: Study of Corridors Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3cn732tv Authors Leavitt, Daniel Cheng, Peter Vaca, Erin et al. Publication Date 1994-03-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California California High Speed Rail Series Potential for ImprovedIntercity Passenger Rail Service in California: Study of Corridors Daniel Leavitt Peter Cheng Erin Vaca Peter Hall Working Paper UCTC No. 222 TheUniversity of California TransportationCenter Universityof California Berkeley, CA94720 The University of California Transportation Center The University of California Center activities. Researchers Transportation Center (UCTC) at other universities within the is one of ten regional units region also have opportunities mandated by Congress and to collaborate with UCfaculty established in Fall 1988 to on selected studies. support research, education, and training in surface trans- UCTC’seducational and portation. The UC Center research programs are focused serves federal Region IX and on strategic planning for is supported by matching improving metropolitan grants from the U.S. Depart- accessibility, with emphasis ment of Transportation, the on the special conditions in California Department of Region IX. Particular attention Transportation (Caltrans). and is directed to strategies for the University. using transportation as an instrument of economic Based on the Berkeley development, while also ac- Campus, UCTCdraws upon commodating to the region’s existing capabilities and persistent expansion and resources of the Institutes of while maintaining and enhanc- Transportation Studies at ing the quality of life there. Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, and Los Angeles; the Institute of The Center distributes reports Urban and Regional Develop- on its research in working ment at Berkeley; and several papers, monographs, and in academic departments at the reprints of published articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Areas in the Los Angeles Basin
    Practice Areas in the Los Angeles Basin •The Los Angeles TERMINAL CHART includes 13 Flight Training areas indicated by a magenta CAUTION BLOCK containing the area title, altitude, and frequency. •The boundaries of these areas are not charted. However, SCAUWG has drawn candidate or general guideline boundaries in this presentation. These boundaries are shown in many FAAST seminars. •These data are provided solely as a guide for pilots flying in the Los Angeles Basin. They do not represent fixed boundaries or other regulatory airspace designated or defined by the FAA. The “legal stuff” … There are 13 areas in the Los Angeles Basin used for practice by students as well as pilots working on enhanced ratings – and in at least three cases, aerobatic training. This presentation was developed by Al German, CFI (retired), while working with Orange County Flight Center. The reference lines that designate the practice areas are general in nature and represent discussions by Mr. German with flight schools in each of the areas designated. This data is provided solely as a guide for pilots flying in the Los Angeles Basin and in no way, represents fixed boundaries or other regulatory airspace designated by the FAA. It is made available for use by pilots by Mr. German and the Southern California Airspace Users Working Group. Original: 26 Feb 2001 Revised: : January 2012 Generally speaking, these practice areas are on the perimeters of various Class B or Class C airspace. So pilots in training must not only look out for each other; but must be aware of the traffic routes to-and-from these high-use designated airspaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink AVT Palmdale
    AVT Lancaster Connections to/from Metrolink AVT Palmdale Vincent Grade/ Free Connections Acton REGIONAL SYSTEM MA P Anaheim Resort Transit Vista Canyon ART WITH FREE CO NNECTIONS AVT AVTA STC Via Princessa BPS Baldwin Park Shuttle BMT Beaumont Transit STC Santa Clarita BAS Burbank Airport Shuttle LOS ANGELES BRB Burbank Bus AVT LAC STC Newhall CO. CMB Commerce Municipal Bus VENTURA CC Corona Cruiser LMB CO. Sylmar/ LMB EMS El Monte Commuter Shuttle LDT LMB San Fernando LMB GLB FHT Foothill Transit t – BAS BRB TOR Sun Valley BAS STC GLB Glendale Beeline SAN BERNARDINO OMT LDT GCT Gold Coast Transit STC LMR CO. BMT MPS APU/Citrus College ISH iShuttle SIM Burbank Airpor LMB North (AV Line) LMB OMT Ventura – East VCT VCT LMB LMB FHT GCT OMT LAC LA County DPW Shuttle LMB LAC VCT VCT SIM LDT LDT LDT BUR RTA OxnardGCT Camarillo Moorpark Simi Valley Chatsworth Northridge CMB LMB FHT FHT LMB Van Nuys GLB FHT LA Metro Bus Burbank – Downtown AVT FHT BPS OMT FHT FHT LMR LA Metro Rail EMS OMT FHT OMT OMT Chatsworth North Hollywood Glendale LDT LADOT MBL Montebello Bus Lines LMB Cal State L.A.El Monte Baldwin ParkCovina Pomona – ClaremontNorth Montclair Upland Rancho CucamongaFontana Rialto San BernardinoSan Depot Bernardino – Downtown BRB L.A. Union Station MPS Monterey Park Spirit Bus Burbank Airport - San BernardinoRedlands – TippecanoeRedlands – Esri Redlands – Downtown – University South (VC Line) Atlantic ONT BAS NCS NCTD - Sprinter/Breeze 7th/Metro NWT Wilshire/Western MBL Norwalk Transit LMB Montebello/ OMT OCT OCTA CommerceCMB Santa Monica
    [Show full text]
  • Coast-Daylight
    MAY 2013 Coast Corridor SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Railroad Administration. This publication does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. FINAL SUBMITTAL May 2013 SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Coast Corridor Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Transportation AECOM 1120 N Street 2101 Webster Street #1900 P.O. Box 942874 Oakland, CA 94612 Sacramento, CA 95814 with Cambridge Systematics & Arellano Associates [This page intentionally blank] Coast Corridor Service Development Plan May 2013 Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Organization of the Coast Corridor SDP ................................................................................ 1-3 1.2 Relationship of the Coast Corridor SDP to Other Documents ................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 SDP Support for State Rail Plan ............................................................................................ 1-4 1.2.2 Integration with other SDPs ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simi Valley Water System Consumer Confidence Report on Water Quality for 2019
    2020 Simi Valley Water System Consumer Confidence Report on Water Quality for 2019 Providing Quality Drinking Water in California Since 1929 www.gswater.com/SimiValleyCCR facebook.com/GoldenStateH2O @GoldenStateH2O About the Company Providing Quality Drinking Water in California Since 1929 Golden State Water Company (GSWC) is a wholly owned Dear Golden State Water Customer, subsidiary of American States Golden State Water Company (GSWC) is pleased to present our 2020 Annual Water Quality Report Water Company (NYSE:AWR). (Consumer Confidence Report), providing customers with important information regarding local GSWC provides water service to water quality and service during the 2019 calendar year. more than 1 million people in over 80 communities throughout Last year was a monumental year for California water policy, specifically related to water quality. California and distributes Water providers throughout the state were required to complete lead testing at schools in their local service areas by July 2019 to meet compliance with legislation (AB 746) that California electricity to approximately Governor Jerry Brown signed into law in 2017. Additionally, the state established new guidelines 24,000 customers in the City of for testing and reporting for certain compounds that fall within a class of emerging contaminants Big Bear Lake and surrounding known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. While consumer products and food are areas in San Bernardino County, a large source of exposure to PFAS, drinking water can be an additional source in communities California, through its Bear Valley where these chemicals have infiltrated water supplies from industrial facilities where these Electric Service division. AWR chemicals were produced or used to manufacture other products, or where certain firefighting also owns a contracted services foams were used for either training or fighting Class B (liquid) fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden State Water Company Region 1, 2 & 3
    GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY REGION 1, 2 & 3 – SERVICE LIST FILED Sacramento Suburban Water Dist. Citrus Heights Water District 07/15/20 3701 Marconi Avenue – Suite 100 6230 Sylvan Road 04:59 PM Sacramento, CA 95821 Citrus Heights, CA 95610 [email protected] A2007012 [email protected] Carmichael Water District California-American Water Co. 7837 Fair Oaks Blvd. 4701 Beloit Drive Carmichael, CA 95608-2405 Sacramento, CA 95838-2434 [email protected] Cypress Ridge Owner’s Association Fair Oaks Water District Attn: President 10317 Fairoaks Blvd. 1400 Madonna Road Fairoaks, CA 95628 San Luis Obisbo, CA 93405 [email protected] City of Folsom Orange Vale Water Co 50 Natoma Street P. O. Box 620800 Folsom, CA 95630 9031 Central Avenue Orange Vale, CA 95662 [email protected] Director City of Antioch Sacramento County Water Agency P. O. Box 5007 827-7th Street, Room 301 Antioch, CA 94531 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] Bay Point Municipal Advisory Council City of Brentwood 3105 Willow Pass Road Public Works Operations Bay Point, CA 94565-3149 Eric Brennen, Water Operations Manager 2201 Elkins Way Brentwood, CA 94513 Contra Costa Water District Contra Costa County P. O. Box H2O Chief Assistant Clerk of the Board Concord, CA 94520 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553 [email protected] Diablo Water District Richard Lou, Principal Management Analyst P. O. Box 127 East Bay Municipal Utility District Raley’s Shopping Center – 2107 Main Street 375 – 11th Street, MS#804 Oakley, CA 94561-0127 Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] City of Martinez Highlands Water Company 525 Henrietta Avenue 14580 Lakeshore Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Clearlake, CA 95422-8100 Page 1 of 12 1 / 12 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY REGION 1, 2 & 3 – SERVICE LIST Konocti County Water District Local Agency Formation Commission 15844 – 35th Street P.
    [Show full text]