DOCSLIB.ORG

RESEARCH ARTICLE an Annotated Catalog of the Iranian Torymidae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RESEARCH ARTICLE an Annotated Catalog of the Iranian Torymidae TAES 143: 453-472 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSO 0002-8320 http://taes.entomology-aes.org/ An annotated catalog of the Iranian Torymidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) HASSAN GHAHARI1 and MIKDAT DOĞANLAR2 1- Department of Plant Protection, Yadegar-e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: hghahari@yahoo.com (Corresponding author) 2- Biological Control Research Station, Adana, Turkey. E-mail: mikdoganlar@yahoo.com.tr ABSTRACT The fauna of Iranian Torymidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) is summarized in this paper. In total 80 species from 2 subfamilies Megastigminae (10 species within 2 genera), and Toryminae (70 species within 16 genera) are listed as the fauna of Iran. Distribution and host data of species are given. Key words: Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Torymidae, catalog, Iran INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS The family Torymidae (Hymenoptera, The published data on distribution of the Chalcidoidea) is distributed worldwide and Torymidae in Iran are summarized by province. contains 1100 valid species within 67 genera and Subfamilies, tribes, genera and species are listed two subfamilies, Megastigminae and Toryminae alphabetically. The following data are included in (Noyes 2016). Members of this family are both the catalogue for each species: (1) valid name, (2) entomophagous (parasitoids of gall makers) and junior synonym(s) used in literature about Iran, (3) phytophagous and include wide range of hosts published Iranian records synthetized by province (Grissell 1995). The subfamily Megastigminae (classified by alphabetical order of Iranian province comprises primarily phytophagous species which names) and the relevant references (classified by are associated with seeds of coniferous trees and chronological order), (4) about the new country rosaceous plants (Roques and Skrzypczynska records, number of species, (5) host records in Iran, 2003). Toryminae includes entomophagous species, (6) synthetical information on general distribution especially on gall forming Hymenoptera and on a world scale. When accurate data about local Diptera (Grissell 1995). Because of characteristic distribution in Iran are lacking in a quoted reference, morphology (long ovipositor) of torymids, they are the mention “Iran (no locality cited)” is used. successful for biological control of insects which Classification, nomenclature and distribution data of have sheltered habitat (e.g. xylophagus beetles) suggested by Noyes (2016) have been followed. The (Lotfalizadeh 2012). Iranian provinces are shown in Figure 1. The Iranian fauna of the Torymidae has been poorly studied. The first checklist of the torymids RESULTS fauna of Iran was prepared by Modarres Awal (1997) with 5 species from 3 genera. Stojanova and Ghahari Species diversity of Iranian Torymidae is (2009), and Fallahzadeh et al. (2009) listed 36 and 41 represented in this catalogue by 80 species from species, respectively. After the mentioned checklists, 18 genera, Adontomerus Nikol’skaya (4 species), several contributions comprise new data have been Bootanomyia Girault (5), Cryptopristus Förster (1), published (see references). The aim of this paper is Ecdamua Walker (1), Eridontomerus Crawford (2), cataloging of all the data on Iranian Torymidae. Exopristoides Bouček (1), Exopristus Ruschka (1), Publication date: 19 May 2017 454 IRANIAN TORYMIDAE Figure 1: Map of Iran with boundaries of provinces. Glyphomerus Förster (5), Idiomacromerus Crawford Family Torymidae Walker, 1833 (6), Megastigmus Dalman (5), Microdontomerus Crawford (2), Monodontomerus Westwood (6), Subfamily Megastigminae Thomson, 1876 Oopristus Steffan (1), Podagrion Spinola (5), Podagrionella Girault (4), Pseudotorymus Masi Genus Bootanomyia Girault, 1915 (12), Torymoides Walker (3), and Torymus Dalman (16). Four species, Glyphomerus tibialis Förster, Bootanomyia almusiensis (Doğanlar, 1989) 1856, Monodontomerus minor (Ratzeburg, 1848), Torymus affinis (Fonscolombe, 1832), and Torymus Megastigmus almusiensis Doğanlar, 1989. cultriventris Ratzeburg, 1844 (all Toryminae) are new records for the fauna of Iran. The list of species Distribution in Iran — Iran (no locality cited) is given below alphabetically with distribution data. (Nieves-Aldrey et al. 2008, Stojanova and Ghahari 2009, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 as Megastigmus GHAHARI & DOĞANLAR 455 almusiensis Doğanlar, 1989). Bootanomyia dumicola (Boucek, 1982) General distribution — Iran, Turkey. Megastigmus dumicola Bouček, 1982. Bootanomyia dorsalis (Fabricius, 1798) Distribution in Iran — Kermanshah (Nazemi- Megastigmus dorsalis (Fabricius, 1798). Rafie et al. 2007, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 as Megastigmus dumicola Bouček, 1982). Distribution in Iran — Fars, Khuzestan General distribution — France, Iran, Spain. (Golestaneh et al. 2008 as Megastigmus dorsalis Comments — Parasitoid of Andricus cecconii (Fabricius, 1798)), Kermanshah (Nazemi-Rafie et (Cynipidae) on Quercus brantii (Fagaceae) (Nazemi- al. 2007, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 as M. dorsalis), Rafie et al. 2007 asM. dumicola). Kordestan (Nazemi-Rafie et al. 2007, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 as M. dorsalis, Nazemi Rafie and Bootanomyia stigmatizans (Fabricius, 1798) Lotfalizadeh 2012), Lorestan (Lotfalizadeh and Gharali 2005, Azizkhani et al. 2005, 2008, Stojanova Megastigmus stigmatizans (Fabricius, 1798). and Ghahari 2009, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 as M. dorsalis), West Azarbaijan (Zargaran et al. 2008, Distribution in Iran — Kermanshah, Kordestan Stojanova and Ghahari 2009, Fallahzadeh et al. (Nazemi-Rafie et al. 2007, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 2009), Iran (no locality cited) (Tavakoli et al. 2010 as Megastigmus stigmatizans (Fabricius, 1798)), as M. dorsalis). Lorestan (Azizkhani et al. 2005, 2008, Stojanova General distribution — Andorra, Austria, and Ghahari 2009, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009 as M. Belgium, Bosnia Hercegovina, Bulgaria, China, stigmatizans), Iran (no locality cited) (Tavakoli et al. Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Europe, 2010 as M. stigmatizans). Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, General distribution — Austria, Bosnia Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Macedonia, Moldova, Hercegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, England, Europe, France, Germany, Greece, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Hungary, Iran, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Romania, former USSR (European). Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Comments — Parasitoid of Andricus cecconii Turkey, Ukraine, former USSR. Kieffer, 1901, A. grossulariae Giraud 1859, A. Comments — Parasitoid of Andricus megalucidus (Melika, Stone, Sadeghi and Pujade- quercustozae (Bosc 1792) (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) Villar, 2004), A. multiplicatus Giraud 1859, A. on Quercus infectoria (Nazemi-Rafie et al. 2007 as truncicolus (Giraud, 1859), Chilaspis israeli M. stigmatizans), Andricus insana Westwood, 1837 Sternlicht, 1968, Cynips quercusfolii Linnaeus, 1758 (Azizkhani et al. 2008 as M. stigmatizans). (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) on Quercus brantii and Q. infectoria (Fagaceae) (Nazemi-Rafie et al. 2007), Bootanomyia synophri (Mayr, 1874) Andricus aestivalis Giraud, 1859, A. cecconii, A. grossulariae, A. multiplicatus, Dryocosmus israeli Megastigmus synophri Mayr, 1874. (Sternlicht 1968), Neuroterus saliens (Kollar 1857) (Cynipidae) on Quercus brantii, Andricus lucidus Distribution in Iran — Lorestan (Azizkhani et (Hartig, 1843), A. megalucidus, Andricus panteli al. 2008). (Kieffer, 1896) on Quercus infectoria (Azizkhani General distribution — Algeria, Austria, et al. 2008), Aphelonyx persica (Melika, Stone and Bulgaria, Europe, Greece, Hungary, Turkey. Sadeghi 2003) (Cynipidae) (Golestaneh et al. 2008 Comments — Parasitoid of Dryocosmus israeli as M. dorsalis). (Cynipidae) (Azizkhani et al. 2008). 456 IRANIAN TORYMIDAE Genus Megastigmus Dalman, 1820 cited) (Zoebelein 1966, Grissell and Prinsloo 2001, Nikolskaya and Zerova 1978, Rice and Michailides Megastigmus aculeatus (Swederus, 1795) 1988, Roques and Skrzypczynska 2003). General distribution — Afghanistan, Algeria, Distribution in Iran — East Azarbaijan Armenia, Australia, Bulgaria, China, Croatia, Cyprus, (Daneshvar et al. 2009), Tehran (Rakhshani et al. Europe, France, Georgia, Greece, Iran, Israel, Italy, 2003a, b, Stojanova and Ghahari 2009, Fallahzadeh Kirgizia, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Portugal, et al. 2009, Daneshvar et al. 2009), Iran (no locality Russia, Spain, Syria, Tadzhikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, cited) (Peck 1963, Grissell 1979, Xu and He 1995, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United States of America, O’Connor 2003, Roques and Skrzypczynska 2003). former USSR (Central Asia, European), Uzbekistan. General distribution — Argentina, Armenia, Comments — M. pistaciae is a key pest of Australia, Austria, Bosnia Hercegovina, Bulgaria, Pistacia vera and P. atlantica in Iran (Modarres Awal China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, 1997, Zohdi et al. 2016) and also hazelnut (Modarres England, Ethiopia, Europe, Finland, France, Awal 1997). Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Megastigmus rosae Bouček, 1971 Nearctic, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Somalia, South Distribution in Iran — East Azarbaijan Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tadzhikistan, (Lotfalizadeh and Gharali 2005, Stojanova and Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United States of America, Ghahari 2009, Fallahzadeh et al. 2009, Daneshvar et USSR (Central Asia, Eastern USSR, European, al. 2009), Kerman (Madjdzadeh et al. 2013), West Siberia), former
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Managing Alternative Pollinators a Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers, and Conservationists
    Managing Alternative Pollinators A Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers, and Conservationists ERIC MADER • MARLA SPIVAK • ELAINE EVANS Fair Use of this PDF file of Managing Alternative Pollinators: A Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers, and Conservationists, SARE Handbook 11, NRAES-186 By Eric Mader, Marla Spivak, and Elaine Evans Co-published by SARE and NRAES, February 2010 You can print copies of the PDF pages for personal use. If a complete copy is needed, we encourage you to purchase a copy as described below. Pages can be printed and copied for educational use. The book, authors, SARE, and NRAES should be acknowledged. Here is a sample acknowledgement: ----From Managing Alternative Pollinators: A Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers, and Conservationists, SARE Handbook 11, by Eric Mader, Marla Spivak, and Elaine Evans, and co- published by SARE and NRAES.---- No use of the PDF should diminish the marketability of the printed version. If you have questions about fair use of this PDF, contact NRAES. Purchasing the Book You can purchase printed copies on NRAES secure web site, www.nraes.org, or by calling (607) 255-7654. The book can also be purchased from SARE, visit www.sare.org. The list price is $23.50 plus shipping and handling. Quantity discounts are available. SARE and NRAES discount schedules differ. NRAES PO Box 4557 Ithaca, NY 14852-4557 Phone: (607) 255-7654 Fax: (607) 254-8770 Email: nraes@cornell.edu Web: www.nraes.org SARE 1122 Patapsco Building University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-6715 (301) 405-8020 (301) 405-7711 – Fax www.sare.org More information on SARE and NRAES is included at the end of this PDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Note Selective Interspecific Information Use in the Nest
    Animal Biology 70 (2020) 215–225 brill.com/ab Short Note Selective interspecific information use in the nest choice of solitary bees Olli J. Loukola1,2,4,∗, Elia Gatto3,4, Ana C. Híjar-Islas4 and Lars Chittka4,5 1 University of Oulu, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, PO Box 3000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland 2 Botanical Museum, Biodiversity Unit, PO Box 3000, FI-90014, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland 3 University of Padova, Department of General Psychology, 35100 Padova, Italy 4 Queen Mary University of London, Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom 5 Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Institute for Advanced Study, Wallotstrasse 19, D-14193 Berlin, Germany Submitted: October 30, 2019. Final revision received: December 13, 2019. Accepted: December 20, 2019 Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens)andthe orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction of the Red Mason Solitary Bee Osmia Rufa (Syn
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 100–105, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.005 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Reproduction of the red mason solitary bee Osmia rufa (syn. Osmia bicornis) (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in various habitats MONIKA FLISZKIEWICZ, ANNA KuśnierczaK and Bożena Szymaś Department of apidology, institute of zoology, Poznań university of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71c, 60-625 Poznań, Poland; e-mails: monef@up.poznan.pl; aniajuliak@gmail.com; beszymas@up.poznan.pl Key words. Hymenoptera, Megachilidae, Osmia rufa (Osmia bicornis), ecosystem, reproduction, pollination, parasitism Abstract. Osmia rufa L. (Osmia bicornis L.) is a species of a solitary bee, which pollinates many wild and cultivated plants. A total of 900 cocoons containing mature individuals of Osmia rufa L. (450 females and 450 males of a known weight), were placed in each of four habitats (orchard, mixed forest, hay meadow and arboretum of the Dendrology Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences at Kórnik). These bees were provided with artificial nests made of the stems of common reed. The following parameters were calculated: reproduction dynamics, total number of chambers built by females, mean number of breeding chambers per reed tube and mean num- ber of cocoons per tube. included in the analysis were also the nectar flowers and weather conditions recorded in each of the habitats studied. General linear mixed models indicated that the highest number of chambers was recorded in the hay meadow (6.6 per tube). However, the number of cocoons per tube was similar in the hay meadow, forest and orchard (4.5–4.8 per tube) but was significantly lower in the arboretum (3.0 cocoons per tube on average).
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Fliszkiewicz.Indd
    DOI: 10.2478/v10289-012-0006-x Vol. 56 No. 1 2012 Journal of Apicultural Science 51 THE ACCOMPANYING FAUNA OF SOLITARY BEE OSMIA BICORNIS (L.) SYN. OSMIA RUFA (L.) NESTS SETTLED IN DIFFERENT BIOTOPES Monika Fliszkiewicz, Anna Kuśnierczak, Bożena Szymaś Department of Apidology, Institute of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznań, Poland. e-mail: monef@up.poznan.pl Received 08 November 2011; accepted 24 April 2012 S u m m a r y Red mason bee Osmia bicornis (L.) is a solitary bee which has been shown to be a successful pollinator of many field crops and greenhouse crops. In favorable environmental conditions, this solitary bee can significantly raise the efficiency of crops. Controlled honeybee farms are invaded by various accompanying fauna. The aim of the study was to find out if the biotope may increase or limit the presence of foreign fauna in the nests of the solitary bee O. bicornis (L.). Four different biotopes were selected: a traditional orchard, the dendrological park of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Kórnik, a mixed forest, and a haymeadow, where artificial aggregations of O. bicornis (L.) were made, with 300 specimens in each. They were given artificial nests of common reed. The nests were then analysed after the end of the brooding period. The number of brood chambers built by females was determined. The number of chambers where the forms of development stopped at the egg or larva stage, the number of parasite-invaded chambers, and the systematic membership of the encountered foreign fauna, was also determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera,Torymidae) of Bulgaria: Published Data and New Records 657-665 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 0039_1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Stojanova Anelia Artikel/Article: The Torymid fauna (Hymenoptera,Torymidae) of Bulgaria: published data and new records 657-665 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 39/1 657-665 23.7.2007 The Torymid fauna (Hymenoptera,Torymidae) of Bulgaria: published data and new records A.M. STOJANOVA A b s t r a c t : In the present paper all published data concerning Torymid fauna of Bulgaria is summarized. Fifty-three species belonging to 14 genera were recorded in entomological papers till now. Faunistic data on another 15 species, new to the Bulgarian fauna, is herein presented. K e y w o r d s : Hymenoptera, Torymidae, faunistic, Bulgaria, species list. Introduction Chalcid wasps of the family Torymidae WALKER 1833 belong to 69 genera and have worldwide distribution (NOYES 2003). Most Torymids are primary parasitoids or hyper- parasitoids of various insects, members of 8 orders. Only about 1/6 of the species are phytophagous (inquilines in galls or seed-feeders associated with coniferous trees and rosaceous plants) (GRISSELL 1995). The Torymid fauna in Bulgaria has not been a subject of a special investigation. Only 53 species have been published in chalcidological papers till now. The geographical and climatic conditions and a great variety of habitats in Bulgaria predetermine the existence of rich entomofauna with specific features. This gives basis to presume that the future studies on torymids occurring the region will increase considerably our information about species diversity of the family in Bulgaria and European and Palaearctic distribu- tion of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 60 No. 1 2016J
    DOI:10.1515/JAS-2016-0003 J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 60 No. 1 2016J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 60 No. 1 2016 Original Article REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL AND NESTING EFFECTS OF OSMIA RUFA (SYN. BICORNIS) FEMALE (HYMENOPTERA: MEGACHILIDAE) Karol Giejdasz1* Monika Fliszkiewicz1 Andrea Bednárovᡠ2 Natraj Krishnan3 1 Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland 2 Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences Branišovská, the Czech Republic Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, USA 3Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, USA *corresponding author: kagiede@up.poznan.pl Received 21 September 2015; accepted 24 January 2016 A b s t r a c t The red mason bee Osmia rufa is a solitary bee belonging to the family Megachilidae, and is prone to nest in aggregations. Each female builds a nest separately in pre-ex- isting cavities such as holes in wood and walls or empty plant stems. This is done by successively setting the cells in a linear series. In this study, we elucidate the nesting behavior and the reproductive potential of a single O. rufa female. The reproductive potential of nesting females was evaluated after the offspring finished development. We observed that an individual female may colonize up to five nest tubes and build 5-34 cells in them (16 on an average). During the nesting time the number of cells decreased with the sequence of nest tubes colonized by one female, which built a maximum of 11 cells in the first occupied nest and 5 cells in the last (fifth nest).
    [Show full text]
  • Short Note Selective Interspecific Information Use in The
    Animal Biology (2020) DOI 10.1163/15707563-20191233 brill.com/ab Short Note Selective interspecific information use in the nest choice of solitary bees Olli J. Loukola1,2,4,∗, Elia Gatto3,4, Ana C. Híjar-Islas4 and Lars Chittka4,5 1 University of Oulu, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, PO Box 3000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland 2 Botanical Museum, Biodiversity Unit, PO Box 3000, FI-90014, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland 3 University of Padova, Department of General Psychology, 35100 Padova, Italy 4 Queen Mary University of London, Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom 5 Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Institute for Advanced Study, Wallotstrasse 19, D-14193 Berlin, Germany Submitted: October 30, 2019. Final revision received: December 13, 2019. Accepted: December 20, 2019 Abstract Most of the studies on learning in bees have focused on the foraging context; we know little about the preferences and cognitive processes in nest-site selection, especially in solitary bees. The majority of the bee species are solitary and in contrast to eusocial bees, solitary bees’ cognition and social information use have remained largely unstudied. Solitary cavity-nesting mason bees (Osmia spp.) are an ideal system to study interspecific information use in nest choice in the wild as many species share similar nesting requirements. Here, we show that the blue mason bee (O. caerulescens)andthe orange-vented mason bee (O. leaiana) examine hallmarks of parasitization of the nests of red mason bees (O. bicornis) before deciding where to establish their own nests. They were also presented with contextual cues (geometric symbols) that could be linked to parasitization by observational learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta, Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae and Torymidae in Iran
    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) www.checklist.org.br Journal of Species Lists and Distribution © 2009 Check List and Authors LISTS OF SPECIES Insecta, Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eurytomidae and Torymidae in Iran 1 * 2 3 Majid Fallahzadeh, Thekke Curuppathe Narendran, and Nazila Saghaei 1 Islamic Azad University, Jahrom Branch, Department of Entomology. Jahrom Branch, Fars, Iran. 2 University of Calicut, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Department of Zoology. Karala 673635, India 3 Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, Department of Plant Protection. Marvdasht Branch, Fars, Iran. *Corresponding author: mfalahm@yahoo.com Abstract: A taxonomic checklist of 43 species of Eurytomidae belonging to seven genera, and 41 species of Torymidae belonging to 15 genera, are currently recognized as occurring in Iran. Based mostly on various faunistic survey reports; no eurytomid or torymid species with collection records from Iran have previously been listed. Therefore; we did not intend to confirm identifications of previous studies, except in very obvious cases. A more comprehensive collection-based study is needed to confirm the actual Iranian occurrence of each species listed in this checklist. Introduction Materials and Methods In the Chalcidoidea, the family Eurytomidae The present checklist aims at reviewing as many with 1400 described species and the family references as possible to the Eurytomidae and Torymidae with 960 species are important in Torymidae, and listing every species with an regulating the populations of many insect species Iranian record. However; we did not intend to (Noyes 2008). For the Iranian fauna, studies of confirm identifications by previous workers Hedicke (1921), Boucek (1952; 1977), Nikolskaya except for very obvious cases. We follow the (1952) and Burks (1971) contain some faunistic classification and taxonomic arrangement of reports on Iranian Eurytomidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Secretions Prevent Wasp Parasitism in Nests of Wool-Carder Bees, with Implications for the Diversification of Nesting Materials in Megachilidae
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 06 January 2015 ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION doi: 10.3389/fevo.2014.00086 Plant secretions prevent wasp parasitism in nests of wool-carder bees, with implications for the diversification of nesting materials in Megachilidae Thomas Eltz 1*, Jennifer Küttner 1, Klaus Lunau 2 and Ralph Tollrian 1 1 Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany 2 Institute of Sensory Ecology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany Edited by: Bees make use of plant substrates in more ways than any other group of insects, Florian Paul Schiestl, University of which is probably linked to their diversification and ecological success. The highly diverse Zürich, Switzerland Megachilidae use a wide range of plant-derived brood cell-building materials, including Reviewed by: plant leaves, mortar made from plant tissue, resin, plant hairs (“plant wool”), and plant Thomas Schmitt, University of Wuerzburg, Germany trichome secretions. While certain plant-derived materials are believed to protect nests Stefan Dötterl, University of against microbial decay, this has not been tested, and the factors driving diversification Salzburg, Austria of nesting materials are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the protective effects Nicolas Jean Vereecken, Université of plant-derived extrafloral trichome secretions which female European wool-carder Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Johannes Stökl, University of bees, Anthidium manicatum, smear on their brood cells. By breeding bees in cages Regensburg, Germany with differential resource supply we generated brood cells with or without trichome *Correspondence: secretions. Brood cells with trichome secretions were less attractive to chalcidoid wasps Thomas Eltz, Department of Animal (Monodontomerus obscurus), potential parasites of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Accompanying Fauna of Red Mason Bees in Annual and Perennial Nesting Sites
    Med. Weter. 2014, 70 (12) 745 Praca oryginalna Original paper Accompanying fauna of red mason bees in annual and perennial nesting sites BARBARA ZAJDEL, KORNELIA KUCHARSKA*, DARIUSZ KUCHARSKI**, MONIKA FLISZKIEWICZ***, JAKUB GĄBKA Apiculture Division, Faculty of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland *Division of Zoology, Department of Animal Environment Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland **Department of Ecology, Institute of Zoology, Warsaw University, Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland ***Department of Apidology, Institute of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznań, Poland Received 14.04.2014 Accepted 15.09.2014 Zajdel B., Kucharska K., Kucharski D., Fliszkiewicz M., Gąbka J. Accompanying fauna of red mason bees in annual and perennial nesting sites Summary Nests of red mason bees (Osmia bicornis L.) are inhabited by characteristic accompanying fauna, which to a varying extent restricts the development of the bee population. The aim of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of nest material from four sites. At three sites artificial nests of common reed and bee cocoons were placed for the first time (M1 – Kłoda, Masovian Voivodeship, M2 – Sąpłaty, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, M3 – Kanie, Masovian Voivodeship). At the fourth one (M4 – an experimental apiary of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences) mason bee nests and cocoons had been placed every year for 10 years. The number of species accompanying mason bees, the number of dead larvae, fully formed cocoons and parasites/ cleptoparasites at the newly populated sites was determined and compared with the perennial mason bee nesting site.
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Pollinator Protection Plan Doug Miyamoto Director of Agriculture
    Managed Pollinator Protection Plan Doug Miyamoto Director of Agriculture A Wyoming Department of Agriculture Publication Prepared by: Hank Uhden, Agriculture Program Manager Wyoming Dept. of Agriculture FORWARD The Wyoming Managed Pollinator Protection Plan was developed in response to a growing need for a balanced public policy that mitigates risk to managed pollinators, while minimizing the impact of that mitigation on production agriculture. In Wyoming, the two managed pollinators that this plan addresses are honey bees (Apis mellifera) and the Leafcutter Bee (Megachile rotundata). Reducing pollinator exposure to pesticides is ideal. Our hope is to achieve this while continuing to provide access to habitat that supports bee health and derived benefits to agriculture. This pollinator plan is not a static document, but a work in progress. Far too little is known about the factors that may affect pollinator health. Research focusing on nutrition, bee repellants and the effects of pesticides is important. Other research into honey bee health, disease and parasite resistance and genetic diversity is also urgently needed so that more effective and comprehensive strategies can be put in place. We believe research can provide new answers and better solutions to the current dilemma. Finally, effective communication among all parties is essential to the success of this plan. Unless we communicate freely and openly with one another, the rest of our goals cannot be reached. Working together – farmers, beekeepers, pesticide applicators, scientists
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics the Latest Buzz in Bee Biology No
    Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics The latest buzz in bee biology No. 69, pp. 1–6 1 May 2017 BRIEF COMMUNICATION Unusual nesting behavior in Megachile (Eutricharaea) rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) Cory S. Sheffield1 Abstract. The Alfalfa Leafcutter Bee, Megachile (Eutricharaea) rotundata (Fabricius), is one of the most studied solitary bees in the world. Although its nesting biology is well documented, it has not yet been reported nesting in cavities that expose the nests to open environments. Reported here for the first time is evidence of this species nesting in an unusual manner which would subject the natal cells to exposure and increased parasite attack. Bees of the genus Megachile Latreille s.l. (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) are com- monly called leafcutters as females of most species cut circular leaf pieces, less com- monly flower petals (e.g., Orr et al., 2015), or combinations of materials (e.g., Zillikens & Steiner, 2004) that are used in the construction of individual natal cells (Fig. 1), each of which will contain one developing bee. Other species of Megachile are masons or daubers, creating nest partitions out of plant resins or similar pliable materials (Mi- chener, 2007; MacIvor & Moore, 2013). Leafcutter bees will construct nests in a variety of places, including cavities excavated into the soil (Eickwort et al., 1981) or decom- posing wood (Hobbs & Lilly, 1954; Stephen, 1956), but most species nest in natural pre-existing cavities in wood, stone, or other substrates; see Sheffield et al. (2011) for a summary of nesting sites used by species occurring in Canada. Regardless of the nest- ing substrate used, female leafcutter bees normally exhibit the behavior of building and provisioning their nests in a linear series, with eggs destined to become females being laid first (i.e., at the rear of the rear of the series in the nesting cavity), with males being produced towards the nest entrance.
    [Show full text]