DOCSLIB.ORG

Diadromous Fish Assemblage Assessment in the Saco River Estuary, ME

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Diadromous Fish Assemblage Assessment in the Saco River Estuary, ME Kayla Smith James Sulikowski, Ph.D. and Carrie Byron, Ph.D. Dept of Marine Sciences Saco River Estuary • Nursery ground • Foraging stop-over site for migratory fishes • 60 marine, diadromous and freshwater species observed since 2007 (J. A. Sulikowski, unpubl. data) Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Previous Research o Reynolds and Casterlin, 1985, Hydrobiologia – n = 18 o Furey and Sulikowski, 2011, Northeastern Naturalist – n = 24 o Little et al. 2013, Journal of Applied Ichthyology Gear types used include: Hook and line Plankton tows Light and modified lobster traps Beam and otter trawl Seine, D-frame and gill netting Settlement collectors Long line Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Diadromous fishes • Provide important links between coastal watersheds and the Atlantic Ocean • Economic and cultural value Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Diadromous fishes in the Gulf of Maine 12 species Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Status in the Gulf of Maine • Complicated life history • Severe population declines • Lost connections = impaired ecosystems • Need: better define interactions and linkages between species Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Does fish species diversity, richness and abundance vary along a river gradient in the Saco River estuary? Is there interannual variability in the fish community? Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work River Channel Sampling 10 8 6 4 2 Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Channel Gill nets Marsh 4”“Multi and 6”-mesh” mesh 3” 1” ¾” Michigan Sea Grant Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Upper Middle Multi-mesh • Multi-mesh • 4” mesh Multi-mesh Lower • Multi-mesh • 4” mesh Multi-mesh • Multi-mesh • 6” mesh Gill nets 2012 2013 Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Sampling Methods – Gill nets • Set between 2 and 4 a.m. • Pick-up between 6 and 8 a.m. • Temperature • Salinity • Dissolved oxygen Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Beach Seining 2010-13 Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Fish Metrics and Abundance Catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) N = Number of fish caught t = Time of net in water CPUE = N/t/ln/hn ln = Length of net hn = Height of net mesh area Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Biodiversity Indices Shannon - Wiener Diversity Index 풔 H’ = diversity index, ′ 푯 = − 풑풊 퐥퐧 풑풊 S = total number of species 풊=ퟏ pi = proportion of S represented by the ith species Simpsons diversity index 퐧(풏 − ퟏ) n = total number of individuals of a 푫 = ퟏ − single species 퐍 (푵 − ퟏ) N = total number of individuals caught Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Preliminary Results – Gill nets • 17 trips June through September – 2012 (5) – 2013 (12) • 230 hours fished – Average soak of 3.7 hours • 353 fish caught – 13 species, juveniles and adults – 89 % diadromous fish Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Salinity Gradient 20 A 18 17 16 14 ) ppt 12 10 B B Salinity ( 8 6 6 6 4 2 0 Upper Middle Lower Upriver Mouth Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Fish Abundance 20 0.006 B 18 0.005 16 14 0.004 ) 12 ppt 10 0.003 B (CPUE) effort unit 8 - Salinity ( Salinity 0.002 per 6 - 4 Catch A 0.001 2 0 0 Upper Middle Lower Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Fish Abundance 100%100 90%90 80%80 Alosa spp. 70%70 Acipenser spp. 60%60 Morone spp. 50%50 Other 40%40 30%30 20%20 10%10 0 Upper Mid Lower Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Fish Abundance 100%100 90%90 80%80 Alosa spp. 70%70 57% 57% Acipenser spp. 60%60 87% Morone spp. 50%50 Other 40%40 16% 30%30 43% 20%20 17% 6% 10%10 2% 0 Upper Mid Lower Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work BiodiversitySpecies Richness Indices Shannon Diversity Index Simpson's Index of Diversity Species Richness (n) 2 14 1.81 1.8 12 12 1.6 10 1.4 10 1.23 1.2 1.02 8 1 0.78 6 0.8 0.66 0.6 0.52 3 4 Diversity Indices Diversity 0.4 Richness Species 2 0.2 0 0 Upper Middle Lower Station Introduction Methods Preliminary Results Conclusions Future Work Results – Beach Seining 227 seines 11,544 fish 4% Diadromous Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Fish Abundance 2010 2011 2012 2013 Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Life History Groups 100% 11% 90% 80% 70% 61% 33% 60% Freshwater 50% Estuarine 40% Marine 30% 56% 20% 33% Percentage of Catch of Catch Percentage 10% 0% 6% fresh and oligohaline (0-5ppt) mesohaline (5-18ppt) Water classifications from the EPA’s Volunteer Estuary Modeling Manual. Fish species life history classifications categorized by Dionne et al. (1999) and FishBase v. 04/2014. Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Summary • 33 fishes and 4 crustacean species – Gill nets (13), Beach seines (28) • 5 federally-listed species – Endangered (shortnose sturgeon) – Threatened (Atlantic sturgeon) – Species of Concern (blueback herring, alewife, and rainbow smelt) • 4 species of recreational importance – largemouth and striped bass, pumpkinseed, bluefish • 3 species with commercial fisheries – Atlantic herring, winter flounder, red hake Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Summary • Fish abundance, richness and diversity – Lowest in areas with significant salinity mixing – Greatest in areas with less tidal influence • Diadromous fish not observed – brook trout, sea lamprey and Atlantic salmon* • Comparison to Wells Reserve sampling and Penobscot River (Kiraly et al.,2014) Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Comparison to other estuaries • Since 2007, (60) species have been observed in the SRE and Bay – Little River (33) – Kennebec Point (27) – York River (24) – Wells Harbor (24) – Weskeag River (10) – Penobscot River (35) – Penobscot Bay (22) – Casco Bay (25) – Muscongus Bay (24) (Orrniger et al. 2005; Lazzari et al. 1996; Dionne et al. 2006; Ayvazian et al. 1992; Kiraly et al 2014 Lazzari 2002; Lazzari and Tupper 2002; Lazzari et al. 2003) Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Future Work • Continue to collect abundance data – Correlation with freshwater discharge and time from peak high tide • Create a static food web model – Mass-balance approach – Goal: Determine role of diadromous fish as predators and prey Introduction Methods Results Conclusions Future Work Thank you! • Sulikowski Lab – Brenda Rudnicky, Julia Reynolds, Ashleigh Novak • This research was conducted as part of the Sustainability Solutions Initiative, supported by National Science Foundation award EPS-0904155 to Maine EPSCoR at the University of Maine NOAA Section 6 Special License 2013-48-03 Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Introduction Methods Preliminary Results Conclusions Future Work River Herring Counts 88% decline 7,994 Empty Rivers The Decline of River Herring - A Report of the Herring Alliance Source: ASMFC River Herring Compliance Reports. .
Recommended publications
  • Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon

    Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon

    0# North West Branch St John T11 R15 WELS T11 R17 WELS T11 R16 WELS T11 R14 WELS T11 R13 WELS T11 R12 WELS T11 R11 WELS T11 R10 WELS T11 R9 WELS T11 R8 WELS Aroostook River Oxbow Smith Farm DamXW St John River T11 R7 WELS Garfield Plt T11 R4 WELS Chapman Ashland Machias River Stream Carry Brook Chemquasabamticook Stream Squa Pan Stream XW Daaquam River XW Whitney Bk Dam Mars Hill Squa Pan Dam Burntland Stream DamXW Westfield Prestile Stream Presque Isle Stream FRESH WAY, INC Allagash River South Branch Machias River Big Ten Twp T10 R16 WELS T10 R15 WELS T10 R14 WELS T10 R13 WELS T10 R12 WELS T10 R11 WELS T10 R10 WELS T10 R9 WELS T10 R8 WELS 0# MARS HILL UTILITY DISTRICT T10 R3 WELS Water District Resevoir Dam T10 R7 WELS T10 R6 WELS Masardis Squapan Twp XW Mars Hill DamXW Mule Brook Penobscot RiverYosungs Lakeh DamXWed0# Southwest Branch St John Blackwater River West Branch Presque Isle Strea Allagash River North Branch Blackwater River East Branch Presque Isle Strea Blaine Churchill Lake DamXW Southwest Branch St John E Twp XW Robinson Dam Prestile Stream S Otter Brook L Saint Croix Stream Cox Patent E with Licensed Dischargers and W Snare Brook T9 R8 WELS 8 T9 R17 WELS T9 R16 WELS T9 R15 WELS T9 R14 WELS 1 T9 R12 WELS T9 R11 WELS T9 R10 WELS T9 R9 WELS Mooseleuk Stream Oxbow Plt R T9 R13 WELS Houlton Brook T9 R7 WELS Aroostook River T9 R4 WELS T9 R3 WELS 9 Chandler Stream Bridgewater T T9 R5 WELS TD R2 WELS Baker Branch Critical UmScolcus Stream lmon Habitat Overlay South Branch Russell Brook Aikens Brook West Branch Umcolcus Steam LaPomkeag Stream West Branch Umcolcus Stream Tie Camp Brook Soper Brook Beaver Brook Munsungan Stream S L T8 R18 WELS T8 R17 WELS T8 R16 WELS T8 R15 WELS T8 R14 WELS Eagle Lake Twp T8 R10 WELS East Branch Howe Brook E Soper Mountain Twp T8 R11 WELS T8 R9 WELS T8 R8 WELS Bloody Brook Saint Croix Stream North Branch Meduxnekeag River W 9 Turner Brook Allagash Stream Millinocket Stream T8 R7 WELS T8 R6 WELS T8 R5 WELS Saint Croix Twp T8 R3 WELS 1 Monticello R Desolation Brook 8 St Francis Brook TC R2 WELS MONTICELLO HOUSING CORP.
  • The Following Document Comes to You From

    The Following Document Comes to You From

    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) ACTS AND RESOLVES AS PASSED BY THE Ninetieth and Ninety-first Legislatures OF THE STATE OF MAINE From April 26, 1941 to April 9, 1943 AND MISCELLANEOUS STATE PAPERS Published by the Revisor of Statutes in accordance with the Resolves of the Legislature approved June 28, 1820, March 18, 1840, March 16, 1842, and Acts approved August 6, 1930 and April 2, 193I. KENNEBEC JOURNAL AUGUSTA, MAINE 1943 PUBLIC LAWS OF THE STATE OF MAINE As Passed by the Ninety-first Legislature 1943 290 TO SIMPLIFY THE INLAND FISHING LAWS CHAP. 256 -Hte ~ ~ -Hte eOt:l:llty ffi' ft*; 4tet s.e]3t:l:ty tfl.a.t mry' ~ !;;llOWR ~ ~ ~ ~ "" hunting: ffi' ftshiRg: Hit;, ffi' "" Hit; ~ mry' ~ ~ ~, ~ ft*; eounty ~ ft8.t rett:l:rRes. ~ "" rC8:S0R8:B~e tffi:re ~ ft*; s.e]38:FtaFe, ~ ~ ffi" 5i:i'ffi 4tet s.e]3uty, ~ 5i:i'ffi ~ a-5 ~ 4eeme ReCCSS8:F)-, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi'i'El, 4aH ~ eRtitles. 4E; Fe8:50nable fee5 ffi'i'El, C!E]3C::lSCS ~ ft*; sen-ices ffi'i'El, ~ ft*; ffi4s, ~ ~ ~ ~ -Hte tFeasurcr ~ ~ eouRty. BefoFc tfte sffi4 ~ €of' ~ ~ 4ep­ i:tt;- ~ ffle.t:J:.p 8:s.aitional e1E]3cfisc itt -Hte eM, ~ -Hte ~ ~~' ~, ftc ~ ~ -Hte conseRt ~"" lIiajority ~ -Hte COt:l:fity COfi111'lissioReFs ~ -Hte 5a+4 coufity. Whenever it shall come to the attention of the commis­ sioner
  • Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine

    Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine

    watermark volume 26 issue 1 5 stewardship / conserving natural resources Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine The Wells Reserve has produced or assisted with every key conservation planning document prepared for What is a watershed? southern Maine watersheds over the past decade. Use this chart to learn which plans cover your town, then An area in which water, sediments, download the plan(s) from our website or read them at the Dorothy Fish Coastal Resource Library. and dissolved material drain to a To get involved in land or water protection in your area, contact the individuals or organizations named common outlet, such as a river, lake, in the plans. Key contacts for most towns and watersheds can also be found at swim.wellsreserve.org. If these bay, or ocean. avenues don’t work out, call the Wells Reserve stewardship coordinator, Tin Smith, at 646-1555 ext 119. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Watershed A geographic area in which water flows on its way to a larger water body, such as a stream, river, estuary, lake, or Town Bridges Swamp Neddick River Cape River Works Great Josias River Kennebunk River Little River Mousam River Ogunquit River River Piscataqua River Salmon Falls Southside Brook Creek Spruce River Webhannet River York ocean. Coastal and ocean resources Acton 7 11 are affected not only by activities in Alfred 4 7 coastal areas but also by those in Arundel 4 7 upland watersheds. Berwick 2,3 2,11 U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Eliot 2,11 2,11 2,13,14 2,16,17 Kennebunk 4 5,6 7 Kennebunkport 4 Why these watersheds? Kittery 11 11 0 13,14 16,17 The chart shows the Maine watersheds Lebanon 11 and towns that are included in the web- Lyman 4 7 based Seacoast Watershed Information North Berwick 2,3 2,11 Manager (swim.wellsreserve.org).
  • New Hampshire Target Fish Community Assessment: Little River

    New Hampshire Target Fish Community Assessment: Little River

    NEW HAMPSHIRE STATEWIDE TARGET FISH COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT LITTLE RIVER – FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Prepared by: July, 2018 Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Designated River Delineation ................................................................................................... 1 Delineation Methods ............................................................................................................................ 1 Delineation Results ............................................................................................................................... 7 III. Reference River Data Selection .............................................................................................. 13 Reference River Selection Methods .................................................................................................... 13 Reference River Selection Results ....................................................................................................... 17 IV. TFC Model Development ........................................................................................................... 22 TFC Model Development Methods ...................................................................................................... 22 TFC Model Results ............................................................................................................................... 23 V.
  • Follow the Drinking Gourd

    Follow the Drinking Gourd

    Follow the Drinking Gourd Song Lyrics (Click on picture to access song) Songs and quilts helped lead slaves to freedom. Follow the Drinking Gourd! Follow the Drinking Gourd! Ø The Drinking Gourd = the Big Dipper Ø Points north For the old man is awaiting for to carry you to freedom. ►Old Man is slang for a captain. ►Old Man = Peg Leg Joe Where & When When the sun comes back and the first quail calls ►“Sun comes back” = Spring § the days get longer ►“the first quail calls” = mid-April § quail breeding season Mobile, Alabama - North The riverbank makes a very good road, ►“river” = Tombigbee river which is in Alabama The dead trees will show you the way, ►Charcoal mud markings were put on trees and rocks as a guide. Left foot, peg foot traveling on ►The markings were of a human left foot and a round spot for the right foot Mississippi - Tennessee The river ends between two hills. ►The Tombigbee River ends at Woodall Mountain. There’s another river on the other side. ►Cross to the left side of the Tennessee River. § Why? It had a more direct northern route to Ohio. End of the Route Where the great big river meets the little river ►Big river = Ohio River ►Little river = Tennessee River The old man is awaiting for to carry you to freedom. ►A guide will be waiting where the rivers meet. Tape Art Student Objective: Create the Big Dipper and the North Star using tape on the wall or your table. .
  • Fishery Management in the Fish River Drainage

    Fishery Management in the Fish River Drainage

    MAINE DEPARTMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES AND GAME FISHERY RESEARCH BULLETIN No. 6 Fishery Management in the Fish River Drainage by Kendall Warner Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game Augusta, Maine RONALD T. SPEERS, Commissioner Financed in part by Federal Aid to Fisheries Projects F-8-R, F-ll-R, Maine Published under A ppropriation # 7750 FOREWORD Your Inland Fisheries and Game Department is making continu­ ing biological studies of our lakes, rivers, and streams. The purpose of these studies is to evaluate existing and potential fisheries of our inland waters and to make recommendations to maintain the best possible management of our fisheries. As these studies on various river drainages are completed, the findings are presented to the citizens of our State. This report summarizes information collected on the fisheries of the waters in The Fish River drainage, Aroostook County, Maine. The field investigations were made by fishery biologists of the Fishery Research and Management Division of the Maine Depart­ ment of Inland Fisheries and Game over a period of 14 years, from 1950-1964. KENDALL WARNER, Regional Fishery Biologist Ashland, Maine •June, 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Forew ord ...................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 Description of the D ra in a g e ..................................................................... 6 Lake Management .....................................................................................
  • A STORY of the WASHINGTON COUNTY UNORGANIZED TERRITORIES Prepared by John Dudley for Washington County Council of Governments March 2017

    A STORY of the WASHINGTON COUNTY UNORGANIZED TERRITORIES Prepared by John Dudley for Washington County Council of Governments March 2017

    A STORY OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY UNORGANIZED TERRITORIES Prepared by John Dudley for Washington County Council of Governments March 2017 The story of the past of any place or people is a history, but this story is so brief and incomplete, I gave the title of “A Story”. Another person could have written quite a different story based on other facts. This story is based on facts collected from various sources and arranged in three ways. Scattered through one will find pictures, mostly old and mostly found in the Alexander- Crawford Historical Society files or with my families’ files. Following this introduction is a series on pictures taken by my great-grandfather, John McAdam Murchie. Next we have a text describing the past by subject. Those subjects are listed at the beginning of that section. The third section is a story told by place. The story of each of the places (32 townships, 3 plantations and a couple of organized towns) is told briefly, but separately. These stories are mostly in phrases and in chronological order. The listed landowners are very incomplete and meant only to give names to the larger picture of ownership from 1783. Maps supplement the stories. This paper is a work in progress and likely never will be complete. I have learned much through the research and writing of this story. I know that some errors must have found their way onto these pages and they are my errors. I know that this story is very incomplete. I hope correction and additions will be made. This is not my story, it is our story and I have made my words available now so they may be used in the Prospective Planning process.
  • IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS of MAINE an Analysis Of

    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS of MAINE an Analysis Of

    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Thomas P. Hodgman, and Judy Camuso A Project Supported by the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF MAINE An Analysis of Avian Diversity and Abundance February 7, 2008 Compiled by: Susan Gallo, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 Thomas P. Hodgman, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State St., Bangor, ME 04401 Judy Camuso, Maine Audubon, 20 Gilsland Farm Rd., Falmouth, ME 04105 (Present Address: Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 358 Shaker Road, Gray, ME 04039) Recommended citation: Gallo, S., T. P. Hodgman, and J. Camuso, Compilers. 2008. Important Bird Areas Of Maine: an analysis of avian diversity and abundance. Maine Audubon, Falmouth, Maine. 94pp. Cover Photo: Scarborough Marsh at sunrise, by W. G. Shriver ii Table of Contents History ..........................................................................................................................................1 What is an Important Bird Area?.......................................................................................1 Qualifying Criteria...................................................................................................................1 Data Use and Applicability Disclaimer .............................................................................2 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................3
  • Suwannee River Study Report, Florida & Georgia

    Suwannee River Study Report, Florida & Georgia

    A Wild and scenic River Study AS THE NATIONS PRINCIPAL CONSERVATION AGENCY, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAS BASIC RESPONSIBILITIES FOR WATER, FISH, WILDLIFE, MINERAL, LANO, PARK AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES. INOIAN ANO TERRITORIAL AFFAIRS ARE OTHER MAJOR CONCERNS OF AMERICA'S "DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES'.' THE DEPARTMENT WORKS TO ASSURE THE WISEST CHOICE IN MANAGING ALL OUR RE­ SOURc.ES SO EACH WILL MAKE ITS FULL CONTRIBUTION TO A BETTER UNITED STATES NOW AND IN THE FUTURE . U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Rogers C. 8. Morton, Secretory BUREAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION Jatl'IU $.Watt, otfectot SUWANNEE RIVER Florida • G.eorgia A National Wild and Scenic River Study December 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page_ FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Finding .. ,. i Reco111Tiendation i SUMMARY Introduction .•....•.. i i The River .........••. ii Classification ..•... v Protection of Natural Resources •.•.•...•• vi State, Local, and Private Recreation Development viii Management Alternatives . viii Providing Public Use . ••• ix Land Acquisition .... ix Recreation Facilities .• xi The Withlacoochee Segment xi Economic Impact .•.... xii I. INTRODUCTION Wild and Scenic River Studies 2 Background . 3 II. THE RIVER SETTING Location. • . I • I 5 The Resource . I . 5 1 Climate . I . I . 17 Water Resource Development . 17 Cultural Hi story I . I . 20 Economy . • . 21 Population . 22 Landownership • . 23 River Ownership . I . 24 Land Use and Environmental Intrusions I . 24 Recreation . I . • . I . I . • . 29 Nearby Recreation Opportunities . I 36 Significant Features . I . • . I 36 III. ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION Appraisal . • • . 39 Classification . 40 Discussion of Classification . • • . • . 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) Land Requirements .••.• . 47 Fee Acquisition •• 49 Scenic Corridor . .. • 49 Acquisition Criteria .
  • 1982 Maine River Study Appendix J – Rivers with River Related Inland Fisheries

    1982 Maine River Study Appendix J – Rivers with River Related Inland Fisheries

    1982 Maine River Study Appendix J – Rivers with River Related Inland Fisheries Region River Segment Description County Length A Big Ossipee Saco River to NH Border Oxford, York 12.5 A Bog Brook Little Androscoggin River to headwaters Androscoggin, Oxford 9 A Branch Brook Tidewaters to headwaters York 13 A Collyer Brook Royal River to headwaters Cumberland 4 A Crooked River Songo River to Songo Road Oxford, Cumberland 48 A Little Androscoggin River South Paris Dam to headwaters Oxford 15 A Little Ossipee River Route 5 to Balch Pond York 14.5 A Little River Presumpscot River to headwaters Cumberland 16 A Nezinscot River Androscoggin River to headwaters Androscoggin, Oxford 13.5 A Northwest Pond Sebago Lake to Peabody Pond Cumberland 8 A Pleasant River Presumpscot River to headwaters Cumberland 12.5 A Pleasant River Androscoggin River to headwaters Oxford 3 A Saco River Bonney Eagle Dam to NH border Oxford, York 54 A Wild River Androscoggin River NH border Oxford 4.5 B Belgrade Stream Route 27 to Wings Mill Kennebec 6.5 B Cobbosseecontee Headtide to Cobbosseecontee Lake Kennebec 17 B Ducktrap River Headtide to Tilden Pod Waldo 9 B Jock Stream /Dilnow Brook Cobbosseecontee Lake to headwaters Androscoggin, Kennebec 10.5 B Kennebec River Augusta to Skowhegan Kennebec, Somerset 32 B Messalonskee Stream Kennebec River to Messalonskee Lake Kennebec 5 B Oyster River Headtide to headwaters Knox 7.5 B Sebasticook River Benton Falls to Burnham Lake Kennebec 15.5 B Sheepscot River Headtide to Sheepscot Lake Lincoln 23 B St George River Tidewater to
  • Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas

    Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas

    Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas Eastern Woodlands Cost Area State Tribes Alabama State Alabama N/A Mowa Band of Alabama Mowa Band of Choctaw Choctaw Poarch Band of Creek Alabama Poarch Band of Creek Indians of AL Mashantucket W. Connecticut Mashantucket Pequoit Tribe of CT Pequot Mohegan of CT Connecticut Mohegan Indian Tribe of CT Paucatuck E. Pequot Connecticut Paucatuck Eastern Pequoit Tribe Schaghticoke Connecticut Schaghticoke Indian Tribe of CT Eastern Muskogee Florida N/A Seminole (Tampa) Florida Seminole Tribe of FL Seminole (Big Florida Seminole Tribe of FL Cyprus) Seminole (Brighton) Florida Seminole Tribe of FL Lower Muskogee Georgia N/A Pokagon Potawatomi Indiana Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians Sac & Fox Iowa Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississii in Iowa Aroostook Band of Maine Arrostook Band of Indians Micmac MicMac Houlton Maliseet Maine Holuton Band of Maliseet Indians Indian Township Maine Passamaquoddy-Indian Township Reservation Penobscot Maine Penobscot Tribe of ME Pleasant Point Maine Passamaqupddy-Pleasant Point Reservation Mashpee Wampanoag Massachusetts N/A Nipmuc Massachusetts N/A Wampanoag (Gay Massachusetts Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnqh) of MA Head) Bay Mills Michigan Bay Mills of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Grand Traverse Michigan Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Hannahville Michigan Hannahville Community of Michigan Potawatomi Huron Potawatomi Michigan Nottawseppi Huron Potawatomi Keweenaw Bay Michigan Keweenaw Bay Community of Chippewa Lac Vieux Desert Michigan Lav Vieux Desert Band of Chippewa Little River Michigan Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Little Traverse Michigan Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Manistique Michigan Sault Ste Marie Chippewa Tribe of MI Page 1 Table of Tribes Included in Cost Areas Eastern Woodlands Cost Area State Tribes Pokagon Potawatomi Michigan Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians of MI Saginaw Chippewa Michigan Saginaw Chippewa Tribe of MI Sault Ste.
  • Final Report

    Final Report

    Final Report Green Crab, Carcinus maenas, Trapping Studies in the Harraseeket River, and Manipulative Field Trials to Determine Effects of Green Crabs on the Fate and Growth of Wild and Cultured Individuals of Soft-Shell Clams, Mya arenaria (May to November 2013) Brian F. Beal, Professor, Marine Ecology, University of Maine at Machias Director of Research, Downeast Institute for Applied Marine Research & Education 24 January 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2013, the Freeport Town Council approved funding a “Shellfish Restoration Project.” The overarching goals of this field-based effort were to: 1) understand how trapping, netting, and fencing can reduce green crab predation on young-of-the-year clams (i.e., spat, “recruits,” or 0-year class individuals); and, 2) understand how reduced crab predation correlates with increased spat survival. Planned activities focused on three areas of study: 1) green crab trapping in the Harraseeket River at areas adjacent to and south of Weston Point (near Collins Cove) vs. areas north of Weston Point (at Porter Landing, Pettengill flat, and Sandy Beach) to collect information on the relationship between trap immersion time and catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE), how CPUE varied through time and by location, and how size-frequencies of male and female green crabs as well as sex ratios varied spatially and temporally; 2) the role of fenced vs. control vs. netted plots in enhancing 0-year class soft-shell clam individuals (Little River Flat); and 3) the effect of large-scale green crab fencing across an entire cove on enhancing wild soft- shell clam recruits (Recompence Flat). Green crab trapping (using 18-inch diameter x 36-inches long wire traps) occurred from 27 May to 5 November, and involved a total of 15 clammers, seven of whom fished five to ten traps regularly over at least some of that period.