DOCSLIB.ORG

Battle of Monterrey Significance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Battle of Monterrey Significance Battle of monterrey significance Continue Battle of Buena Vista February 23, 1847, on February 23, 1847, more than 15,000 Mexican soldiers charged General Zachary Taylor's small command of the military. Using heavy artillery, a typical of 5,000 people turned back the Mexican army led by Lieutenant General Antonio Lopez to Santa Anna. By nightfall, the Mexican army retreated, ending the battle of Buena Vista, but not the Mexican-American war-torn Buena Vista had fought near Monterrey in northern Mexico. The American war against Mexico was not for freedom or for political reasons, but for more land. General Taylor was just the one to fight a war like that, face 1 of 3 in the wake of the bloody fighting around Monterrey, Mexico, on 21, 1846, the cold, cold rain began to fall on combatants. Zachary Taylor tries to continue his progress with the city extracting blood for every step taken. The column Taylor was sent straight to Monterrey on September 21 was not ready to continue the fight on September 22 — still recovering from a horrific loss to officers and enlisted soldiers who left Gen. H.I. The actions on September 22 will focus entirely on what value can be achieved. Separated from Taylor, it was reduced to worth making strategic and tactical decisions to help the American army get into Monterrey from their recently captured position at Federation Hill, where American soldiers are within range of artillery from the second remarkable knoll, Independence Hill. The autonomous peak sits fort Libertad, occupying an estimated 80 Mexican infantrymen. On the other side of Independence Hill is the Palace of bishops or Palacio del Obispado, which controls the western approach to Monterrey. If American forces to capture the city, both Fort Libertad and Bishop's Palace must fall. From Federation Hill, The Men of Worth knew it would be a matter of time before they were ordered to attack him for independence. Colonel Jackson Tecumche dana noticed the palace and wrote: 'We expect to suffer a huge loss in using it. Brig. Gen. H.J. He recruited about 500 men, a mix of U.S. and Texas Rangers soldiers, to attack the hill in the dead of night. Among these were Company A, 8th U.S. Infantry, commanded by 25-year-old Second Lieutenant James Long Street. Americans began to start the nearly 700-foot hill of Independence Hill, dragging themselves through large rocks and thick thorny bushes, near the Fort Libertad in the darkness, covering all the Americans being discovered about 100 yards from their purpose, Mexican muskets starting to bang. In the black morning, however, most of the shots go overhead. Shut down during the killing, Americans pushed mexicans who outnumbered heavily out of Fort Libertad and sent them streaming towards the palace of bishops. General Worth continued to push his men, ordering attacks against the Archbishop of Canter giver to the sticky beans to crack, with some 200 Mexican soldiers reinforced in the palace with a hoop-holed wall, a wall of 100 000 soldiers. The action on September 22, 1846 focused all on the Western approach to Monterrey as William Verr tried to capture Independence Hill (U.S. Army) Americans had a plan to deal with the palace, but had to haul 12 - how to pound up the Recently Captured Libertad. Those cannonballs burst the door wide open to the palace, making violations in before the American infantry progressed, but they had to deal with the counterattack between the Mexicans, recognizing the strategic significance of Independence Hill, Mexican commanders like Pedro de Ampudia and his south desperately tried to recapture it. Those soldiers were screaming out of the Bishop's Palace. American infantry men were able to find the cover before they reached home, and stuck in their large lines, Mexican troopers proving an easy target for thickening guns and fire rifles that Americans poured into them. The trooper retreated back into the palace, hounded into the palace. By the American military, following them either way. Photo Currier and Ives of the American attacks against Independence Hill and Bishop's Palace. It was close to 3pm twelve hours after their first attack in Fort Libertad, where the men of Worth charged in bishop's palace. The frenzied melee was followed by both sides locked in a hand-held battle for control of the palace. Pouring into the abuse made by howitzer, americans soon had the upper hand. Fighting at bishop's palace fell around 4pm as surviving Mexican forces retreated. American soldiers were dragged down the Mexican standard and soon had stars and stripes flying over the Bishop's Palace. For all his actions on September 22, the dramatic light accident worth less than 25 per him. Strikes from the day before, worth being able to make a quick run of Fort Libertad and then, with intense artillery fire, blows Bishop's palace open. Compared to bloodletting in the eastern line of Monterrey the day before, the attack of value has proved to be the most successful. His strategic initiative to keep up the attacks has maintained mounting pressure on mexican high command charged with protecting the city. Bishop's Palace overlooking Monterrey (LOC) is worth not capturing Independent Hill and The Bishop's Palace, it is unlikely that american forces may have continued to operate with Monterrey, at least not without experiencing unbearable losses as they try to break into the heart of the city, but with his west wing missing General Ampudia, the commander of Mexican forces in the city decided to retreat. His people retreated into the city center, towards the main plaza. They will make one last stand in the center of Monterrey, hoping to blow up the American attack into pieces as they charge through the square form of the city's streets. New vulnerabilities have been made in stone houses and Ampudia awaits attacks to win or lose the city tomorrow. [3] Ibid, who played for The New York Times in 2013, was the first to win the Title. Not to be confused with monterey battles. Battle of Monterey Part of Mexico-American WarUS trooped on Monterrey during the Mexican-American war, lithograph By Carl Nebel de Tezeptember 21–24, 1846 Monterey, Nouveau Leon Triumph, American Belligent, USA, Mexico Command, and Leader Zachary Taylor, Pedro de Ampudia Jose, Garcia-Gondev, Sisssian 6, 220[1]:100 7,303[1]:100 During the Mexican- American War, Lieutenant General Pedro de Ammoudia and the Mexican Army of the North were defeated by the Army of The Occupation, the U.S. Army of Regular, Volunteer and Texas Rangers under the command of General Zachary Taylor. Fighting in a hard-fought city led to heavy injuries on both sides. The fighting ended with two months of armed negotiations, and Mexican forces allowed the evacuation to be organized in return for the surrender of the city. Gen. Value of the troupe walked on Monterrey from the West More info: The United States ordered the battle following the battle of Resaca de la Palma, Taylor crossed the Rio Grande on May 18, while in early June. Arista turned to the command of what remains of his army of 2,638 people to Francisco Mejia that brought them to Monterrey. On June 8, War Minister William L. Marcy ordered Taylor to continue the command of operations in northern Mexico, introduced to Monterrey, and determined his objective to eliminate the enemy who wished an end to the war. Taylor reached Out to Marin on September 15 and departed on September 18. General Pedro de Ambudia was instructed by Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna to retreat to the city of Saltillo where Ambudia was creating a defensive line but Ampididia disagreed, a senseable halo if he could stop Taylor's advance. A total of 3,140 armed forces from Mexico City were deployed: 1,080. Two herds of horses of 3d cavalry line three guns (3-8 pounds), Thousands of people of the Azpeitia Brigade (Col. Florencio Azpeitia) (3d line, two flocks of Jalisco lancers, two ron teams of Guanajuato Cauldron Regiment, six guns (8 and 12 pounds) and an ambulance) 1,060 guns. The men of the Simeon Ramirez Brigade (Acting. In their first major battle with U.S. forces, The New York Times published a list of the most The American battle shows the inner-city battles, the city's defensive map, appearing in the personal records of Ulysses S. Grant, Fort de la Teneria and Diablo, on the east side of the city. Taylor's army, with the Texas Division leading under the command of Major General and Texas Governor James Pinkney Henderson, reached the front plains of Monterey at 9 p.m. on the morning of September 19 when they were shot by Cole. The San Patricio battery on the fort, Taylor ordered the army to go to the camp in Bosque de San Domingo. While an engineer under the command of Major Joseph, K. [1]:92 In addition to the fortifications, Mexican strengths in the city include: Black Fortress (Col. Jose Lopez Uraga, 3d & 4th Line and 9 Guns Included. Tenerife, (2d Ligero under Cole. Efortin del Rincon del Diablo ( P.T. Calisto Bravo and three guns - Capt Ignacio, Joaquin del Arenal), La Puricima Bridge and Tete de Pont (Acto Agaestes under Caldeso and Komdeceo) Joe Arriara 3-Gun 1:92 The western part of the city atop Independencia stands Ft. Libertad (4 guns) and Obispado (Bishop's Place) with the Activos of Mexico, operated by Lt. Col. Franciso de Berra, and 3 guns and 1 hower and Federaciontop as redan (2 guns) and a fort for sale.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mexican General Officer Corps in the US
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Latin American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2011 Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847. Javier Ernesto Sanchez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds Recommended Citation Sanchez, Javier Ernesto. "Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Latin American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Javier E. Sánchez Candidate Latin-American Studies Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: L.M. García y Griego, Chairperson Teresa Córdova Barbara Reyes i VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846 -1847 by JAVIER E. SANCHEZ B.B.A., BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO 2009 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December 2011 ii VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1847 By Javier E. Sánchez B.A., Business Administration, University of New Mexico, 2008 ABSTRACT This thesis presents a reappraisal of the performance of the Mexican general officer corps during the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings First Annual Palo Alto Conference
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST ANNUAL PALO ALTO CONFERENCE An International Conference on the Mexican-American War and its Causes and Consequences with Participants from Mexico and the United States. Brownsville, Texas, May 6-9, 1993 Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Southwest Region National Park Service I Cover Illustration: "Plan of the Country to the North East of the City of Matamoros, 1846" in Albert I C. Ramsey, trans., The Other Side: Or, Notes for the History of the War Between Mexico and the I United States (New York: John Wiley, 1850). 1i L9 37 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST ANNUAL PALO ALTO CONFERENCE Edited by Aaron P. Mahr Yafiez National Park Service Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site P.O. Box 1832 Brownsville, Texas 78522 United States Department of the Interior 1994 In order to meet the challenges of the future, human understanding, cooperation, and respect must transcend aggression. We cannot learn from the future, we can only learn from the past and the present. I feel the proceedings of this conference illustrate that a step has been taken in the right direction. John E. Cook Regional Director Southwest Region National Park Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. A.N. Zavaleta vii General Mariano Arista at the Battle of Palo Alto, Texas, 1846: Military Realist or Failure? Joseph P. Sanchez 1 A Fanatical Patriot With Good Intentions: Reflections on the Activities of Valentin GOmez Farfas During the Mexican-American War. Pedro Santoni 19 El contexto mexicano: angulo desconocido de la guerra. Josefina Zoraida Vazquez 29 Could the Mexican-American War Have Been Avoided? Miguel Soto 35 Confederate Imperial Designs on Northwestern Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 17-1: Manifest Destiny and Expansion
    Name: Date: Chapter 17 Study Guide Section 17-1: Manifest Destiny and Expansion Fill in the blank: 1. Manifest Destiny was the idea that it was America’s God-given fate to expand westward all the way to the Pacific Ocean. 2. John O’Sullivan coined the above term. 3. American Exceptionalism is the idea or belief that America is “special” in terms of its society, economy, and government. 4. John Tyler became President of the United States after William Henry Harrison died in office. 5. The addition of Texas became one of the primary goals of the administration of the above Presidential administration. 6. Henry Clay was the primary Whig Party nominee in the election of 1844. 7. James Polk was the Democratic Party nominee, and eventual winner, in the election of 1844. 8. One of the main goals of the above administration was to see Oregon, jointly occupied by the US and Britain, added to the growing territory of the United States. 9. Americans wanted the northern border of the above territory fixed at a latitude of 54°, 54’ N. 10. The slogan of supporters of this fixed border was “Fifty-Four Forty or Fight” to indicate their willingness to go to war with Britain if necessary. 11. The border was finally fixed at a latitude of 49°N. 12. In 1845, Texas became the 28th state. 13. General Zachary Taylor was sent to Texas to protect American interests. 14. John Slidell was sent to Mexico to negotiate a deal settling the border of Texas, and purchase California and New Mexico if possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Monterrey, Mexico 1846
    United States of America The Mexican-American War “Battle of Monterrey - September 21–24, 1846" U.S. Troops March on Monterrey Mexico during Mexican-American War. By Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot - Published in the 1851 book "The War Between the United States and Mexico, Illustrated". The Battle of Monterrey, Mexico (part of Mexican-American War) Date: September 21 – 24, 1846 Location: Monterrey, Nuevo Leon Result: United States victory Commanders and Leaders General Zachary Taylor Pedro de Ampudia General William J. Worth Jose Garcia-Conde Inspector General W.G. Belknap Francisco Mejia Strengths 6,220 7,303 Casualties and Losses 488 killed and wounded 367 killed and wounded (120 killed, 368 wounded) 43 missing Property of Charles J. DiComo, PhD 05NOV2016 United States of America The Mexican-American War “Battle of Monterrey - September 21–24, 1846" General Worth’s Division Marches on Monterrey from the West. Reference: http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/monterrey-battle.htm Disposition of Forces, Battle of Monterrey Mexico during Mexican-American War. Reference: Smith, J.H., 1919, The War with Mexico, New York: Macmillan Property of Charles J. DiComo, PhD 05NOV2016 United States of America The Mexican-American War “Battle of Monterrey - September 21–24, 1846" Point Isabel, Texas - circa 1861, Harper’s Weekly, Vol. 5, No. 224. Reference: http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/civil-war/civil-war-point-isabel-texas.htm Expansion of Texas Mails in far SW Texas to Serve U.S Troops Reference: “Texas under Six Flags, 1801 – 1865” (2013 exhibit of Vince King) Property of Charles J. DiComo, PhD 05NOV2016 United States of America The Mexican-American War “Battle of Monterrey - September 21–24, 1846" William Goldsmith Belknap (1794 – 1851) William Goldsmith Belknap (Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Days of History: Mexican-American War
    30 Days of History: Mexican-American War Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Causes of the War .................................................................................................................................. 6 Prelude to the Mexican-American War ................................................................................................ 8 America Prepares for War .................................................................................................................. 10 More Territorial Disputes ................................................................................................................... 12 Fighting Continues in the Southwest ................................................................................................ 14 Fighting in the Western Territories ................................................................................................... 16 Fighting Continues in California ........................................................................................................ 18 Battle of Dominguez Rancho ............................................................................................................. 20 General Kearny Goes to California .................................................................................................... 22 Battle of San Pasqual .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Texas Rangers in the Mexican War, 1846-1848
    MIXED BLESSING: THE ROLE OF THE TEXAS RANGERS IN THE MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1848 A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by IAN B. LYLES, MAJ, USA M.A., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 2001 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2003 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. i MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: MAJ Ian B. Lyles Thesis Title: Mixed Blessing: The Role of the Texas Rangers in the Mexican War, 1846- 1848 Approved by: , Thesis Committee Chair COL Lawyn C. Edwards, M.S., M.M.A.S. , Member LTC Steven E. Clay, M.A. , Member William S. Reeder, Ph.D. Accepted this 6th day of June 2003 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Programs Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ii ABSTRACT MIXED BLESSING: THE ROLE OF THE TEXAS RANGERS IN THE MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1848, by MAJ Ian B. Lyles, 110 pages. The Texas Rangers assumed many roles during the Mexican War (1846-1848), fighting in both the northern and central theaters. Along with frontier knowledge and combat experience, they also brought prejudices and they earned a reputation for ill-discipline. Thus, the central research question is whether the Texas Rangers contributed to the success of conventional army forces or did they materially hinder Generals Taylor and Scott more than they helped? Analysis begins by discussing the Mexican War, the Texas Rangers, and the concept of Compound Warfare (CW) (conventional and unconventional forces employed simultaneously to gain a synergistic advantage).
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Doniphan's Leadership in the Mexican War, 1846-1847
    EFFECTIVE AMATEUR: ALEXANDER DONIPHAN'S LEADERSHIP IN THE MEXICAN WAR 18^6-18^7 by CARL BRENT BEAMER B. A., Ohio University, 1976 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1979 Approved by: i~0 T<+ Contents iqjq Table of £42. CI List of Haps i11 Acknowlegenents *v Introduction * 10 Chapter Is Unit Organization and the Trek to Santa Fe Chapter 2: The First March and First Battle 28 Chapter 3: El Paso and the March to Sacramento 38 Chapter kt The Conquest of Chihuahua 53 Conclusion 68 Footnotes 78 Bibliography 83 ii List of Maps 1. Doniphan's Route from Missouri to Chihuahua to New Orleans 9 2. The Counties Doniphan's Hen Came From 22 3. Plan of the Battle of Brazito 33 4. Plan of the Battle of Sacramento ^9 iil A cknowlege merits this work possible. I wish to thank the following people who helped to make Professor Donald Krozek, Professor Robin Higham and Professor Homer Socolofsky, my graduate committee, whose advice and assistance proved invaluable in gathering and organizing the material. Allison Poe, vrhose typing assistance saved me much time and helped clarify the format. My mother, Mrs. O.W. Beamer, for her continual support and encouragement. And a special thanks in memoriam to my father, O.W. Beamer, whose patient reassurance and inspiration kept me going when it seemed impossible. iv Introduction The Mexican War has remained notable in American history for the amazing successes of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican - American War, 1846-48
    THE MEXICAN - AMERICAN WAR, 1846-48 A Regimental Fire and Fury Variant The Mexican-American War, fought a little more than a decade before the Civil War, can easily be adapted to the basic Regimental Fire and Fury Variants Fire and Fury rule system. In addition to having to build the unique armies and terrain for the period, players will need the MAW Quick Regimental Fire and Fury is not just a wargame that Reference Sheet which can be downloaded for free from our sup- recreates the battles of the American Civil War. It was port page on the fireandfury.com website. also designed as a generic set of rules covering a broad The following sections describe the changes to the basic rule system period of warfare that lasted for nearly three centuries. and quick reference sheets, the army organizations, unit ratings, and Often referred to as the Black Powder Era, the most special rules for the era, and one or two historical scenarios. This common weapon on the battlefield was the short range, variant is currently in its beta phase. The modifications are only muzzle-loading smoothbore musket. Black gunpowder experimental game mechanics for playtest, and do not constitute discharged from thousands of these weapons, produced official errata to the published rules. They are simply to have some billowing clouds of acrid white smoke. Through this fun with new ideas that could lead to incremental improvements in the game design. Updates will be posted on our support page. pale, officers rode bravely into battle at the head of their troops.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping-Texas-History-Colonization-To
    INTRODUCTION TO SECOND EDITION The Alamo's Texas Maps for Teachers recognizes that history and geography are inseparable. This project was conceived after listening to teachers voice their concerns that current maps detailing Texas early history were inadequate for their needs. These new maps have been designed by educators for educators. A textual description for each map was written by Dr. Richard B. Winders, Historian & Curator for the Alamo. Dr. Donald S. Frazier, Professor of History at McMurry University in Abilene, Texas, produced the maps. The two educators have worked together on other projects for publishers Houghton Mifflin and Macmillan Reference. Texas Maps for Teachers has several different uses: It is a supplemental reader for teachers unfamiliar with Texas History. The comprehensive overview of important events and themes should be useful to any teacher. Overhead transparencies of the maps it can be produced for use in the classroom by scanning them into a computer and printing them onto commercially available transparency film. Used in combination with the textual descriptions, Texas Maps for Teachers can be used as a mini-textbook for Texas history from 1700 through 1850. The Alamo would like to thank several individuals who contributed their time by reviewing and commenting on this project at various stages. Dr. Ron Tyler, Executive Director of the Texas State Historical Association, offered valuable suggestions that were incorporated into the text and maps. Two teacher in San Antonio's North East Independent School District provided input from their respective grade levels: Barbara Yost, Windcrest Elementary School and Michael Bailey, Omar N. Bradley Middle School.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 Powerpoint
    Chapter 17- Manifest Destiny and War -By the mid-1800s, many Americans held the belief that the American continent, Manifest Destiny from the Atlantic to the Pacific, was theirs for the taking, an idea known as manifest destiny, a term coined by New York publisher John O’Sullivan. Americans believed themselves to be culturally, politically, and economically superior to other cultures and countries, and thus, the United States should be the dominant power in the Americas. -This belief was partially based in America’s Christian roots, which gave rise to the idea that America was a “gift” from God himself and that Americans were his “chosen” people, much like the Hebrews were granted the land of Canaan in the Bible. The Second Great Awakening helped fuel this desire to spread Christianity across the continent. -Politically, Americans believed themselves to be “special”, an idea today called “American Exceptionalism”. As the world’s first truly democratic republic, based on ideas such as popular sovereignty and natural rights philosophy, Americans believed they had a duty to spread democracy, liberty, and freedom across the American continent. -The most compelling reasons for westward expansion were economic. As urban populations grew in the East, and as more immigrants flooded into the country from European countries like Ireland and Germany, the demand for land in the West increased. Many argued that by settlers moving West, it decreased the pressure that large, ethnically diverse populations put on Eastern cities, and westward expansion would help alleviate problems that plagued urban areas: poverty, crime, ethnic tension, etc. Additionally, many saw the west as a perfect opportunity to expand the country’s agricultural wealth, especially slave-based plantation agriculture and the production of cash crops like cotton.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Honor and the Mexican War. Gregory Scott Oh Spodor Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2000 Honor Bound: *Southern Honor and the Mexican War. Gregory Scott oH spodor Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Hospodor, Gregory Scott, "Honor Bound: *Southern Honor and the Mexican War." (2000). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7269. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7269 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterrey Is Ours! the Mexican War Letters of Lieutenant Dana, 1845-1847
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Latin American History History 1990 Monterrey Is Ours! The Mexican War Letters of Lieutenant Dana, 1845-1847 Napoleon Tecumseh Dana Robert H. Ferrell Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Dana, Napoleon Tecumseh and Ferrell, Robert H., "Monterrey Is Ours! The Mexican War Letters of Lieutenant Dana, 1845-1847" (1990). Latin American History. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_latin_american_history/4 MONTERREY IS OURS! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 This page intentionally left blank 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MONTERREY IS OURS! The Mexican War Letters of Lieutenant Dana 1845~1847 Edited By ROBERT H. FERRELL THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Copyright © 1990 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the commonwealth, serving Bellarmine College, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Club, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University.
    [Show full text]