DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Information on Sustainable Waste

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Information on Sustainable Waste Energy recovery council 2016 Directory of waste-to-energy facilities Now celebrating its 25th Anniversary, the Energy Recovery Council is By: Ted Michaels the trade association representing companies, organizations, and local Ida Shiang governments engaged in recovering energy and materials from waste. Table of contents Articles Maps and Figures List of WTE Facilities 3 Waste-to-Energy Capacity 5 ERC Membership 4 Waste-to-Energy Production 6 Waste-to-Energy Capacity 5 77 WTE Plants in 22 States 7 Waste-to-Energy Production 6 Net GHG Emissions Reductions from WTE 8 WTE Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions 8 States Defining WTE as Renewable 9 WTE is a Renewable Resource 9 WTE Throughput vs. Dioxin Emissions 10 WTE has a Superior Emissions Profile 10 WTE Emissions Reductions 2005 vs. 1990 10 National Economic Benefits of the WTE Sector 11 Recycling Rate for WTE Communities and States 12 WTE and Recycling: A Symbiotic Relationship 12 WTE Community Recycling Benchmark Comparisons 12 WTE in the Circular Economy 13 Dioxins Emitted Annually (WTE vs. Spontaneous Landfill fires) 14 The Global WTERT Council 14 Sustainable Waste Management in the U.S. 15 Waste-to-Energy Directory: Key Terms 17 Sustainable Waste Management in the World 16 CAP: Energy-from-Waste Can Help Curb GHG Emissions 36 NAWTEC 42 WTE Carbon Offsets 47 Qualifications for WTE Operators (QRO) 56 U.S Congress Relies on WTE 63 Third Way: Getting it Right: the Next 15 Years of Energy 67 ERC Celebrates Its 25th Anniversary 70 Ocean Conservancy: “Stemming the Tide” 71 Facilities by State Alabama 18 Minnesota 43 California 19 New Hampshire 48 Connecticut 21 New Jersey 49 Florida 24 New York 52 Hawaii 30 Oklahoma 58 Indiana 31 Oregon 59 Iowa 32 Pennsylvania 60 Maine 33 Utah 64 Maryland 35 Virginia 65 Massachusetts 37 Washington 68 Michigan 41 Wisconsin 69 2 List of WTE Facilities Alabama 42) Polk County Solid Waste Resource Recovery Facility (Fosston) 1) Huntsville Waste-to-Energy Facility (Huntsville) 43) Pope/Douglas Waste-to-Energy Facility (Alexandria) California 44) Xcel Energy - Red Wing Steam Plant (Red Wing) 45) Xcel Energy-Wilmarth Plant (Mankato) 2) Commerce Refuse-to-Energy Facility (Commerce) 3) Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (Long Beach) New Hampshire 4) Stanislaus County Resource Recovery Facility (Crows Landing) 46) Wheelabrator Concord Company, L.P. (Concord) Connecticut New Jersey 5) Bristol Resource Recovery Facility (Bristol) 47) Covanta Camden Energy Recovery Center (Camden) 6) CRRA Hartford Trash-to-Energy Plant (Hartford) 7) Southeastern Connecticut Resource Recovery Facility (Preston) 48) Covanta Warren Energy Resource Company Facility (Oxford) 8) Wheelabrator Bridgeport, L.P. (Bridgeport) 49) Essex County Resource Recovery Facility (Newark) 9) Wheelabrator Lisbon Inc. (Lisbon) 50) Union County Resource Recovery Facility (Rahway) 51) Wheelabrator Gloucester Company, L.P. (Westville) Florida 10) Bay County Waste-to-Energy Facility (Panama City) New York 11) Hillsborough County Resource Recovery Facility (Tampa) 52) Babylon Resource Recovery Facility (West Babylon) 12) Lake County Resource Recovery Facility (Okahumpka) 53) Covanta Hempstead (Westbury) 13) Lee County Resource Recovery Facility (Ft. Myers) 54) Dutchess County Resource Recovery Facility (Poughkeepsie) 14) McKay Bay Refuse-to-Energy Facility (Tampa) 55) Huntington Resource Recovery Facility (East Northport) 15) Miami-Dade County Resource Recovery Facility (Miami) 56) MacArthur Waste-to-Energy Facility (Ronkonkoma) 16) Palm Beach Renewable Energy Facility #1 (West Palm Beach) 57) Niagara Resource Recovery Facility (Niagara Falls) 17) Palm Beach Renewable Energy Facility #2 (West Palm Beach) 58) Onondaga County Resource Recovery Facility (Jamesville) 18) Pasco County Solid Waste Resource Recovery Facility (Spring Hill) 19) Pinellas County Resource Recovery Facility (St. Petersburg) 59) Oswego County Energy Recovery Facility (Fulton) 20) Wheelabrator South Broward Inc. (Ft. Lauderdale) 60) Wheelabrator Hudson Falls L.L.C. (Hudson Falls) 61) Wheelabrator Westchester, L.P. (Peekskill) Hawaii 21) Honolulu Resource Recovery Venture—HPOWER (Kapolei) Oklahoma 62) Walter B. Hall Resource Recovery Facility (Tulsa) Indiana 22) Indianapolis Resource Recovery Facility (Indianapolis) Oregon 63) Marion County Solid Waste-to-Energy Facility (Brooks) Iowa 23) Arnold O. Chantland Resource Recovery Plant (Ames) Pennsylvania 64) Covanta Plymouth Renewable Energy (Conshohocken) Maine 65) Delaware Valley Resource Recovery Facility (Chester) 24) ecomaine (Portland) 66) Lancaster County Resource Recovery Facility (Bainbridge) 25) Mid-Maine Waste Action Corporation (Auburn) 26) Penobscot Energy Recovery Company (Orrington) 67) Susquehanna Resource Management Complex (Harrisburg) 68) Wheelabrator Falls Inc. (Morrisville) Maryland 69) York County Resource Recovery Center (York) 27) Montgomery County Resource Recovery Facility (Dickerson) 28) Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.P. (Baltimore) Utah 70) Davis Energy Recovery Facility (Layton) Massachusetts 29) Haverhill Resource Recovery Facility (Haverhill) Virginia 30) Pioneer Valley Resource Recovery Facility (Agawam) 71) Alexandria/Arlington Resource Recovery Facility (Alexandria) 31) Pittsfield Resource Recovery Facility (Pittsfield) 72) Hampton-NASA Steam Plant (Hampton) 32) SEMASS Resource Recovery Facility (West Wareham) 73) I-95 Energy/Resource Recovery Facility (Lorton) 33) Wheelabrator Millbury Inc. (Millbury) 74) Wheelabrator Portsmouth Inc. (Portsmouth) 34) Wheelabrator North Andover Inc. (North Andover) 35) Wheelabrator Saugus Inc. (Saugus) Washington Michigan 75) Wheelabrator Spokane Inc. (Spokane) 36) Detroit Renewable Power (Detroit) Wisconsin 37) Kent County Waste-to-Energy Facility (Grand Rapids) 76) Barron County Waste-to-Energy & Recycling Facility (Almena) Minnesota 77) Xcel Energy French Island Generating Station (LaCrosse) 38) Great River Energy - Elk River Station (Elk River) 39) Hennepin Energy Resource Center (Minneapolis) 40) Olmsted Waste-to-Energy Facility (Rochester) 41) Perham Resource Recovery Facility (Perham) 3 ERC MEMBERSHIP Membership is available for WTE owners and operators, local governments, and companies that provide goods and services to WTE owners and operators. Visit www.energyrecoverycouncil.org for more info. Waste-to-Energy Owners/Operators Covanta Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. The Babcock & Wilcox Company 445 South Street 100 Arboretum Drive 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place Morristown, NJ 07960 Suite 310 Suite 700 (862) 345-5000 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Charlotte, NC 28277 www.covanta.com (603) 929-3000 (704) 625-4900 www.wtienergy.com www.babcock.com ERC Municipal Members ERC Associate Members City and County of Honolulu, HI Caterpillar/Solar Turbines City of Alexandria/Arlington County (VA) DustMASTER EnviroSystems City of Ames (IA) Resource Recovery System Dvirka & Bartilucci Consulting Engineers City of Long Beach, CA Energy Answers International City of Tampa, FL Gershman, Brickner, and Bratton, Inc. Connecticut Materials Innovation and Recycling Authority Great River Energy County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, CA Green Conversion Systems, LLC Dade-Miami County, FL Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLC Delaware Solid Waste Authority HDR, Inc. ecomaine Helfrich Brothers Boiler Works, Inc. Fairfax County, VA Hitachi Zosen Inova USA Hennepin County (MN) Dept. of Environmental Services INASHCO North America Inc. Kent County (MI) Department of Public Works Jansen Combustion & Boiler Technologies, Inc. Lancaster County (PA) Solid Waste Management Authority Konecranes Canada, Inc. Lee County (FL) Solid Waste Division Lab USA Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority Lechler Inc. Olmsted County (MN) Martin GmbH Onondaga County (NY) Resource Recovery Agency Minnesota Resource Recovery Association Pinellas County (FL) Utilities New England Mechanical Overlay Pollution Control Financing Authority of Camden County (NJ) PERC Holdings LLC Pope-Douglas (MN) Solid Waste Management Plattco Corporation Prairie Lakes Municipal Solid Waste Authority (MN) Powerhouse Technology, Inc. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County (FL) Ramboll Solid Waste Disposal Authority of Huntsville (AL) RRC Power & Energy, LLC Southeastern CT Regional Resources Recovery Authority RRT Design & Construction Town of Wallingford (CT) Southern Recycling Wasatch (UT) Integrated Waste Management District Valmet Inc. York County (PA) Solid Waste Authority Zampell Refractories, Inc. 4 WASTE-TO-ENERGY CAPACITY Total Capacity U.S Facilies (by energy) Daily Gross Electric Equivalent CHP Throughput Capacity Capacity No. of Operang Facilies in the U.S. Ownership Operaon Operating Facilities 77 Private 41 Private 65 States with WTE 22 Public 36 Public 12 No. of Facilies (by technology) No. of Facilies (by oake) Mass Burn 60 Electricity Generation 59 Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) 13 Steam Export 3 Modular 4 Combined Heat & Power 15 5 WASTE-TO-ENERGY PRODUCTION WTE facilities continue to be extremely stable and reliable Total Producon by U.S WTE Facilies 2014 MSW Throughput 2014 Electric Generaon WTE facilities continue to operate reliably and steadily, which is a testament to the success of the technology. While some units eventually close, and some new units have been added, waste-to-energy facilities have a proven track record of operational availability, reliability. Challenging market conditions in the energy and waste markets have served as an impediment to constructing more facilities and recovering energy from more of the 250 million tons of post-recycled waste that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Electrification and Codes
    Strategic Electrification and Energy Codes February 2021 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................3 Shifting the Code Conversation to Carbon .................................................................................................................4 Carbon Reduction through Strategic Electrification ...............................................................................................4 Combustion-Free Requirements ............................................................................................................................4 Code Adoption, Stretch Codes, and Electrification Opportunities in Code ................................................................5 Regional Code Adoption Landscape .......................................................................................................................5 Stretch Codes in the Region ...................................................................................................................................6 DC Stretch Code- Appendix Z .................................................................................................................................6 IECC 2021: Opportunities and Setbacks .................................................................................................................7 Electrification in Codes ...............................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Recovery from Waste Incineration—The Importance of Technology Data and System Boundaries on CO2 Emissions
    energies Article Energy Recovery from Waste Incineration—The Importance of Technology Data and System Boundaries on CO2 Emissions Ola Eriksson 1,* and Göran Finnveden 2 1 Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Building, Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Gävle, SE 801 76 Gävle, Sweden 2 Division of Environmental Strategies Research–fms, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Sciences and Engineering (SEED), School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden; goran.fi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-26-648145 Academic Editor: George Kosmadakis Received: 19 October 2016; Accepted: 12 April 2017; Published: 15 April 2017 Abstract: Previous studies on waste incineration as part of the energy system show that waste management and energy supply are highly dependent on each other, and that the preconditions for the energy system setup affects the avoided emissions and thereby even sometimes the total outcome of an environmental assessment. However, it has not been previously shown explicitly which key parameters are most crucial, how much each parameter affects results and conclusions and how different aspects depend on each other. The interconnection between waste incineration and the energy system is elaborated by testing parameters potentially crucial to the result: design of the incineration plant, avoided energy generation, degree of efficiency, electricity efficiency in combined heat and power plants (CHP), avoided fuel, emission level of the avoided electricity generation and avoided waste management. CO2 emissions have been calculated for incineration of 1 kWh mixed combustible waste. The results indicate that one of the most important factors is the electricity efficiency in CHP plants in combination with the emission level of the avoided electricity generation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Maryland Statewide Waste Characterization Study
    NORTHEAST MARYLAND WASTE DISPOSAL AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 2016 MARYLAND STATEWIDE WASTE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY FINAL REPORT July 14, 2017 11875 High Tech Avenue, Suite 150, Orlando, FL (800) 679-9220 www.mswconsultants.com This report was delivered electronically. If it is necessary to print hard copies, please do so on post-consumer recycled paper and recycle. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been successful without the cooperation and assistance of multiple disposal facilities across the State of Maryland. MSW Consultants would like to thank the following facilities for hosting the field data collection during this project: Appeal Landfill of Calvert County, Cecil County Central Landfill, Charles County Landfill, Forty West Municipal Landfill of Washington County, Garrett County Landfill, Northwest Transfer Station, City of Baltimore, Quarantine Road Landfill, City of Baltimore Northern Landfill of Carroll County, Somerset County Landfill. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the study organizers for their assistance in the organization and data collection for this project: Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority (NMWDA). NMWDA/Maryland Department of the Environment 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. 2 NMWDA/Maryland Department of the Environment TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... ES-1 ES 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet Neste Lipa 2
    Revision date: 21/08/2017 Supersedes date: 30/07/2015 SAFETY DATA SHEET NESTE LIPA 2 SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product name NESTE LIPA 2 Product number ID 10748 Internal identification 7572 1.2. Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Identified uses Solvent. 1.3. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Supplier Neste Markkinointi Oy Keilaranta 21, Espoo, PL 95, FIN-00095 NESTE, FINLAND Tel. +358 10 45811 [email protected] 1.4. Emergency telephone number National emergency telephone +358-9-471 977, +358-9-4711, Poison Information Centre number SECTION 2: Hazards identification 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture Classification (EC 1272/2008) Physical hazards Flam. Liq. 2 - H225 Health hazards Eye Irrit. 2 - H319 STOT SE 3 - H336 Asp. Tox. 1 - H304 Environmental hazards Not Classified 2.2. Label elements Pictogram Signal word Danger Hazard statements H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour. H304 May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. H319 Causes serious eye irritation. H336 May cause drowsiness or dizziness. 1/9 Revision date: 21/08/2017 Supersedes date: 30/07/2015 NESTE LIPA 2 Precautionary statements P210 Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking. P304+P340 IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. P305+P351+P338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. P301+P330+P331 IF SWALLOWED: Rinse mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 District of Columbia Energy Conservation Code
    2017 District of Columbia Energy Conservation Code 2017 District of Columbia Energy Conservation Code 2017 District of Columbia Energy Conservation Code First Printing: September 2020 COPYRIGHT © 2014 International Code Council, Inc. (for 2015 International Energy Conservation Code®) COPYRIGHT © 2020 Government of the District of Columbia (for new text) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This 2017 District of Columbia Energy Conservation Code contains substantial copyrighted materi- als from the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code®, third printing, which is a copyrighted work owned by the Interna- tional Code Council, Inc. (“ICC”). Without advance written permission from the ICC, no part of this book may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, without limitation, electronic, optical or mechanical means (by way of example, and not limitation, photocopying, or recording by or in an information storage retrieval system). For information on use rights and permissions, please contact: ICC Publications, 4051 Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, IL 60478. Phone 1- 888-ICC-SAFE (422-7233). The 2017 District of Columbia Energy Conservation Code contains substantial copyrighted material from the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1—2013, which is a copyrighted work owned by ASHRAE. Without advance written permission from the copyright owner, no part of this book may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, without limita- tion, electronic, optical or mechanical means (by way of example, and not limitation, photocopying, or recording by or in an infor- mation storage retrieval system). For information on permission to copy material exceeding fair use, please contact: ASHRAE Publications, 1791 Tullie NE, Atlanta, GA 30329.
    [Show full text]
  • Craighead County Regional Solid Waste Management District
    REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CRAIGHEAD COUNTY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT November 1, 2004 November 1, 2004 CRAIGHEAD COUNTY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE – Activities Analysis CHAPTER TWO – Action Plan Section 2.101 Overview Section 2.201 Mission Statement A. History B. Current Section 2.202 Executive Summary A. Strategies Section 2.102 Organization and Administration B. Outlook A. District B. Board Section 2.203 Goals C. Staff A. District’s High-Level Goals B. District Plan’s Goal Areas Section 2.103 Revenues and Expenditures 1. Collection A. District 2. Disposal B. County 3. Recycling C. City 4. Waste Reduction 5. Special Materials Section 2.104 Demographics 6. Education and Public Awareness A. Planning Area 7. Other Goals B. Population C. Industry Section 2.204 Goal Areas – Objectives D. Facilities A. Collection E. Haulers B. Disposal F. Volumes C. Recycling G. Flow D. Waste Reduction H. Economic Impact E. Special Materials F. Education and Public Awareness Section 2.105 Current Services G. Other Goals A. Collection B. Disposal Section 2.205 Administrative C. Recycling A. Plan Implementation D. Waste Reduction B. Implementation Timetable E. Special Materials C. Funding and Budgeting F. Education and Public Awareness G. Other Services Section 2.206 Legislative Studies Section 2.207 Appendices A. Administrative Procedures B. By-Laws C. Regulations and Ordinances D. Tables, Charts, Graphs and Maps E. Other Information Regional Solid Waste Management Plan for Craighead County RSWMD 1 November 1, 2004 REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN For the Craighead County Regional Solid Waste Management District PART TWO - CHAPTER ONE — ACTIVITIES ANALYSIS A.C.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Gulf States Litter Control Policy and Programs
    EPA 842-R-16-004 December 2016 ATLAS OF GULF STATES LITTER CONTROL POLICY AND PROGRAMS A TRASH FREE WATERS PROGRAM RESOURCE TRASH FREE WATERS PROGRAM U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Atlas of Gulf States - Litter Control Policy and Programs Trash Free Waters Program TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 THE GULF REGIONAL STRATEGY AND PROJECTS .......................................................................................................... 5 RATIONALE FOR THE GULF ATLAS .......................................................................................................................................... 6 ATLAS INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 SEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 STATE-LEVEL PROGRAMS ....................................................................................................... 9 ALABAMA ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research, Development, Demonstrations and Commercialisation Endeavours for Accelerating Clean Energy Innovations
    Research, development, demonstrations and commercialisation endeavours for accelerating Clean Energy Innovations Sanjay Bajpai Adviser/ Scientist ‘G’ Department of Science & Technology (DST) Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi-110016 [email protected] www.dst.gov.in Science, Technology and Innovation Framework for Clean Energy Innovation National Policy Accelerate the pace of discovery and delivery of science led solutions for High priority sector including Energy through enhanced global cooperation and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) DST Mandate Build human, institutional and technology capacity forging alliances, partnership and R&D Missions for larger benefit of society through S&T. Mission for Clean Energy • Promote novel ideas & cutting edge research to foster innovations • Foster Translational Research to develop competitive technologies • Nurture start ups and partner with industry for accelerated diffusion through start ups and industries. Page 1 Advancing technology readiness levels through Clean Energy Research, Development and Demonstration Fundamental and early stage research ( www.serb.gov.in) Capacity building, applied research, proof of concept, technology development, demonstrations ( www.dst.gov.in, www.dsttara.in ) Market readiness of promising innovations and technologies (www.nstedb.com, www.tdb.gov.in ) 550 DST’s Clean Energy Portfolio DST Funding for Clean Energy 500 2000 450 1800 400 1600 350 1400 ₹ 300 ₹ 1200 250 1000 200 800 in million million in inmillion 600 150
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Energy Small Business Innovation Research Program and Small Business Technology Transfer Program
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AND SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM PHASE I RECOVERY ACT APPLICATIONS SELECTED FOR AWARDS BY STATE ARKANSAS Company Title NanoMech, LLC Recovery Act – 535 Research Center Boulevard, Suite 135 Scale-up of Production of Active Nanoparticles-Based Novel Fayetteville, AR 72701-6948 Lubricant Additives to Improve Energy Efficiency and Durability Summary This proposal addresses scale-up and commercialization of novel nanoparticles-based lubricant additives for harsh boundary lubrication regimes (ball bearings, gears, and other related equipment) saving hundreds of millions of dollars from fuel savings, reduced vehicle exhaust emission, reduced friction and wear to improve energy efficiency and durability of U.S. industries. ARIZONA Company Title MER Corporation (Materials and Electrochemical Research) Recovery Act – 7960 South Kolb Road A Very Low Cost Process for the Manufacture of Ti Heat Tucson, AZ 85756-9237 Exchanger Components for Desalination Summary The very low cost titanium manufacturing developed in this program will provide a dramatic reduction in the cost of heat exchangers used for desalination. In addition to the increased availability of potable water, this will provide a major commercial advantage for domestic corporations for the sale and operation of these plants. Company Title MER Corporation (Materials and Electrochemical Research) Recovery Act – An Improved Design for Magnetocaloric 7960 South Kolb Road Refrigeration Tucson, AZ 85756-9237 Summary An enhanced thermodynamic cycle to improve performance and simultaneously reduce cost of magnetic refrigerators and air conditioners will be tested in a breadboard prototype refrigerator. Results of the tests will be applied to design a new generation magnetic refrigerator that can compete favorably with modern commercial devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioliquids and Their Use in Power Generation €
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 129 (2020) 109930 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Bioliquids and their use in power generation – A technology review T. Seljak a, M. Buffi b,c, A. Valera-Medina d, C.T. Chong e, D. Chiaramonti f, T. Katra�snik a,* a University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, A�sker�ceva Cesta 6, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia b RE-CORD, Viale Kennedy 182, 50038, Scarperia e San Piero, Italy c University of Florence, Industrial Engineering Department, Viale Morgagni 40, 50134, Firenze, Italy d Cardiff University College of Physical Sciences and Engineering, CF234AA, Cardiff, UK e China-UK Low Carbon College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Lingang, Shanghai, 201306, China f University of Turin, Department of Energy "Galileo Ferraris", Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Torino, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The first EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED) served as an effective push for world-wide research efforts on Bioliquids biofuels and bioliquids, i.e. liquid fuels for energy purposes other than for transport, including electricity, Micro gas turbine heating, and cooling, which are produced from biomass. In December 2018 the new RED II was published in the Internal combustion engine OfficialJournal of the European Union. Therefore, it is now the right time to provide a comprehensive overview Power generation of achievements and practices that were developed within the current perspective. To comply with this objective, Renewable energy directive Biofuels the present study focuses on a comprehensive and systematic technical evaluation of all key aspects of the different distributed energy generation pathways using bioliquids in reciprocating engines and micro gas tur­ bines that were overseen by these EU actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Heat Recovery Technology Assessment
    Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Chapter 6: Innovating Clean Energy Technologies in Advanced Manufacturing Technology Assessments Additive Manufacturing Advanced Materials Manufacturing Advanced Sensors, Controls, Platforms and Modeling for Manufacturing Combined Heat and Power Systems Composite Materials Critical Materials Direct Thermal Energy Conversion Materials, Devices, and Systems Materials for Harsh Service Conditions Process Heating Process Intensification Roll-to-Roll Processing Sustainable Manufacturing - Flow of Materials through Industry Waste Heat Recovery Systems Wide Bandgap Semiconductors for Power Electronics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Quadrennial Technology Review 2015 Waste Heat Recovery Systems Chapter 6: Technology Assessments NOTE: This technology assessment is available as an appendix to the 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review (QTR). Waste Heat Recovery Systems is one of fourteen manufacturing-focused technology assessments prepared in support of Chapter 6: Innovating Clean Energy Technologies in Advanced Manufacturing. For context within the 2015 QTR, key connections between this technology assessment, other QTR technology chapters, and other Chapter 6 technology assessments are illustrated below. Representative Intra-Chapter Connections Representative Extra-Chapter Connections CHP: heat recovery in CHP systems Sustainable Manufacturing: optimization of heat flows to maximize production intensity and minimize waste heat losses Electric Power: waste heat recovery Direct Thermal Energy Conversion: novel energy
    [Show full text]
  • Geopave Standard Base
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Product: GeoPave Standard Base Revision: 30/4/2015 ________________________________________________________________________________________Page 1 of 5 SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY UNDERTAKING 1.1 Product Identifier: Product Name: GeoPave Standard Base 1.2 1.3 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Identified uses: Part of a resin system used to bond aggregate to surfaces 1.4 Details of supplier of the safety data sheet Supplier: Adbruf Ltd Gibbs Marsh Trading Estate Stalbridge, Dorset, DT10 2RX Tel: + 44 (0)1963 362640 Fax: + 44 (0)1963 363762 Email: [email protected] Contact Person: David Fennell 1.5 Emergency telephone number Please contact: +44 (0)1963 362640 SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1 Classification: Physical & chemical hazards / Fire and explosion hazards: No Classification under CLP Inhalation: No data available, not thought to be irritating Skin contact: May be mildly irritating Eye contact: Rinse thoroughly with running water and seek medical advice Ingestion: Seek medical advice 2.2 Label elements: This product has no label elements Not identified as a PBT mixture Hazard statements : H303: May be harmful if swallowed H316: Causes mild skin irritation H320: Causes eye irritation H335 May cause respiratory irritation The information contained in the safety data sheet is given in good faith. It is accurate to the best of our knowledge and belief and has been compiled from data on raw materials. The information given in this data sheet does not constitute or replace the user’s own assessment of workplace risk as required by other health and safety legislation.
    [Show full text]