DOCSLIB.ORG

Fortnight Magazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fortnight Magazine april 2021 issue 481 april 50 2021 FORTNIGHT@ politics, arts & culture in northern ireland FORT NIGHT @ 5 0 Problems with the Independents build communities Protocol How the side effects can be mitigated by Rory Montgomery The standoffs and failures in Brussels by Bernard Conlon New trade opportunities by Edgar Morgenroth Student discounts Personalised service Author events more than just Supporting local artists Also in this issue: Aaron Edwards on the response from books Sole distributors of Fortnight at 50 Loyalists, Jamie Pow on the need for Unionist bridge-building and issue Claire Mitchell on attitudes to the NHS 83 Botanic Avenue, Belfast, BT7 1JL 481 In the Arts pages: Rosemary Jenkinson looks for a Protestant @noalibisbooks Tel: +44 2890 319 601 Heaney, Malachi O’Doherty on Northern humour, with prose and Email: [email protected] www.noalibis.com @noalibisbookstore poetry from new writers Contents ortnight @50 Editorial 1 Politics Rory Montgomery: Protocol problems for both Sovreignty, Good Friday parts of Ireland: North and South 2 and the Protocol Bernard Conlon: Britain, Ireland and Europe: f Vacillating and vitriol over vaccines 6 The purpose of the Ireland/Northern Ireland Edgar Morgenroth: NI Protocol, a view from Dublin 9 Protocol was and is to protect the terms of the Andy Pollak: Why I don’t believe in Border Polls 11 Good Friday Agreement and with it the rights and Aaron Edwards: Leaders and followers in interests of all the people in both parts of Ireland. Ulster Unionism 14 The current and continuing standoffs between the Jamie Pow: The bridges unionists need to build 16 United Kingdom and European Union and their Connal Parr: The SDLP at 50 18 interpretation of its terms is not achieving that. Instead we have shortages, disruption to established Economics trade across the Irish sea and increased communal Graham Brownlow: Hard heads, soft hearts and tension in the North. solid institutions 20 In attempting to remedy the situation both Emer Smyth and Robert Morgan: Generational governments would do well to understand and learn from the reasons why the Good Friday Agreement unfairness & COVID-19: All in this together? 22 was needed. For many years since partition in 1921 Society/Culture the British and Irish Governments asserted Claire Mitchell: Thank you NHS conflicting views of sovereignty and the status of (sorry about the PPE) 24 Northern Ireland and engaged from time to time in Paul Nolan: Did you say kneecapping? 26 trade sanctions. But they recognised the close ties Marcus Leroux: The annals of Tayto Island 27 between the peoples of Ireland and Britain and developed flexible rules on travel and voting rights. Malachi O’Doherty: Northern humour 29 Poem: Bebe Ashley 31 When the Troubles escalated in the 1970s and 80s Cian O’Neill: False flags, falso dawns and claptocrats: they eventually accepted that it was their joint duty to look after the peoples in the North by increasing The London Letter 32 their joint supervision and extending the rules on Arts joint citizenship. It is now also the duty of the Rosemary Jenkinson: On the eve of the Centenary European Union to look after the rights and where is the Protestant Heaney? 35 interests of their citizens in both parts of Ireland. Michelle Gallen: Factory girls – an extract 39 While the United Kingdom remained in the European Poems: Raquel McKee and Nandi Jola 43 Union that was easy. During the Brexit negotiations both sides began to look for political advantage in Books asserting their respective sovereignties without Feargal Cochrane: What difference did it make? 44 much regard to the practical impact and side-effects Alexis Forss: Pulp anthropology 45 on the complex three-way relationships North/South, East/West and internal. Poems: Scott McKendry and Andrew Sturrock 48 Both sides now need to accept that Northern Ireland is a small, anomalous, and fragile territory that needs careful handling. What is needed is light touch regulation both North/South and East/West ACTING EDITOR: Tom Hadden designed to prevent Northern Ireland becoming a LITERARY EDITOR: Anne Devlin ARTS EDITOR: Cian O’Neill serious threat to trade, health and environmental Design by Wendy Dunbar, Dunbar Design regimes in the United Kingdom and Europe. What is Printed by W&G Baird Ltd, Antrim not needed is a highly legalistic and disruptive © Fortnight Publications Ltd 2020 insistence on the preservation of conflicting European and British sovereignties. ortnight @50 fProtocol problems for both parts of Ireland: North and South Rory Montgomery Rory Montgomery is a former Irish diplomat and an honorary professor at the Mitchell Institute, Queen’s University Belfast In the first weeks of 2021, some of the practical consequences of Brexit, including the Protocol, became apparent – in Britain, in Northern Ireland, in the Republic and across the European Union. Some are teething problems and will be resolved in full or in part. But changes in trading flows and volumes are inevitable. And while the focus is on goods, the longer-term impact on services will be considerable, including for Northern Ireland, which for these purposes will be fully outside the EU (or fully within the UK). Some of the problems now apparent are highly visible, easily understood by the public, and have unpalatable effects: pets and rose bushes mean a lot to many people. Photograph Dermott Dunbar Before the referendum the Irish Government But while concrete problems are challenging, stressed – as indeed did Tony Blair and John Major constitutional and political issues can be incendiary. – that a vote to leave could have serious When unionists argue that the Protocol violates the repercussions in Ireland. There were concerns about Good Friday Agreement and undermines the other issues – the protection of human rights, Union, have they a case? North/South co-operation, and the maintenance of 2 FORTNIGHT @ 50 POLITICS the Common Travel Area – but from the beginning inexorably led to the Protocol. Theresa May’s the focus was mainly on the border. Ireland was attempt to break free of this logic led her to propose remarkably successful in persuading the a UK-wide alternative which would EU member states and institutions to effectively have meant no meaningful accept its analysis and adopt its objectives. Boris Johnson Brexit at all and was doomed from the In the context of protecting the peace initially refused start. process and the Good Friday Agreement, to face up to the Boris Johnson initially refused to face “the aim of avoiding a hard border” was realities of the up to the realities of the choice he was front and centre of the EU’s negotiating going to have to make. He assured choice he was mandate. For the EU the maintenance of unionists that he would not accept a deal the integrity of the Single Market was also going to have to which placed any barriers between Great a paramount objective – as it was for make. Britain and Northern Ireland. But Ireland. eventually he did, despite his persistent A “hard border” is not a precise legal term. It claims that he didn’t. The British Government, might have been interpreted as allowing some light reasonably from its point of view, had prioritised arrangements some distance away from the actual the interests of the UK as a whole, and its own frontier. But it was progressively firmed up on the political interests – avoiding a no deal crash-out EU side to mean that there could be no checks or negotiated Brexit. controls on the island of Ireland. This in turn led The point of this recapitulation is to to the conclusion that Northern Ireland must demonstrate that the die was cast early in the Brexit remain aligned with relevant EU single market and process. The Irish Government remained consistent customs regulations, unless other arrangements with in its analysis and tireless in its diplomacy. There the same effect (which nobody on the EU side were intermittent attempts by unionists and their could envisage) were agreed. sympathisers to offer an alternative interpretation In the crucial early months of the negotiations of the implications of the Good Friday Agreement, the UK essentially permitted Ireland to present itself but these never gained serious traction in London as the primary guardian of the Good Friday or Brussels. The EU side never re-examined its Agreement. It largely accepted – or at least did not assumptions about threats to peace and where they seriously question – an interpretation of the Good might come from. Friday Agreement which highlighted its In fact, the Good Friday Agreement says either North/South dimension. It also agreed to the model little or nothing about the European Union, about of NI/EU alignment set out in the December 2017 the border between North and South, or about backstop. It did so to allow negotiations to move on trade within the UK. Therefore, the argument that to other questions, and with the expectation that Brexit or its outworkings formally violate the these issues would be revisited. This was Agreement is hard to sustain. But Brexit seriously understandable. But it created the dynamic which breaches the context and spirit of the Agreement, Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol Article 1 Objectives 1 This Protocol is without prejudice to the provisions of the 1998 Agreement in respect of the constitutional status of Northern Ireland and the principle of consent, which provides that any change in that status can only be made with the consent of a majority of its people. 2 This Protocol respects the essential State functions and territorial integrity of the United Kingdom. 3 This Protocol sets out arrangements necessary to address the unique circumstances on the island of Ireland, 3to maintain the necessary conditions for continued North-South cooperation, to avoid a hard border and to protect the 1998 Agreement in all its dimensions.FORTNIGHT @ 50 POLITICS with very real political and psychological effects.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 227Th COMMISSION MEETING Held Via Microsoft Teams
    28 September 2020 227th COMMISSION MEETING Held via Microsoft Teams Present: Les Allamby, Chief Commissioner Helen Henderson Jonathan Kearney David A Lavery CB Maura Muldoon Eddie Rooney Stephen White In attendance: David Russell, Chief Executive Rhyannon Blythe, Director (Legal, Research and Investigations, and Advice to Government) Claire Martin, Director (Communications, Information and Education, Public and Political Affairs) Hannah Russell, Director (Legal, Research and Investigations, and Advice to Government) Jacqueline McClintock, Finance, Personnel and Corporate Affairs Officer (Agenda items 1-3) Rebecca Magee, Personal Assistant (Agenda items 3-10) Lorraine Hamill, Director (Finance, Personnel and Corporate Affairs) (Agenda items 5-6) Nikita Brijpaul, Boardroom Apprentice The Chief Commissioner welcomed everyone to the first meeting of the new Commission Board and also welcomed Nikita Brijpaul who is the Commission’s Boardroom Apprentice for 2020-21. 1 1. Apologies and Declarations of Interest 1.1 There were no apologies. 1.2 There were no declarations of interest. 2. Minutes of the 226th Commission meeting and matters arising 2.1 The minutes of the 226th Commission meeting held on 24 August 2020 were agreed as an accurate record. Action: 226th Commission meeting minutes to be uploaded to the website. 2.2. The minutes of the closed meeting held on 24 August 2020 were agreed as an accurate record. 2.3 It was noted that the Chief Commissioner had written to the Northern Ireland Office regarding the Commission’s powers. A copy of the Opinion the Commission had received was also included with the letter. A response has not yet been received (item 2.3 of the 226th minutes refers).
    [Show full text]
  • 9781403932150.Pdf
    A-PDF Text Replace DEMO: Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark Palgrave Advances in Irish History PPL-UK_PA-McAuliffe_Fm.indd i 12/20/2008 1:39:25 PM Palgrave Advances Titles include: H.G. Cocks and Matt Houlbrook (editors) THE MODERN HISTORY OF SEXUALITY Saki R. Dockrill and Geraint A. Hughes (editors) COLD WAR HISTORY Patrick Finney (editor) INTERNATIONAL HISTORY Jonathan Harris (editor) BYZANTINE HISTORY Marnie Hughes-Warrington (editor) WORLD HISTORIES Mary McAuliffe, Katherine O’Donnell and Leeann Lane (editors) PALGRAVE ADVANCES IN IRISH HISTORY Helen J. Nicholson (editor) THE CRUSADES Alec Ryrie (editor) EUROPEAN REFORMATIONS Richard Whatmore and Brian Young (editors) INTELLECTUAL HISTORY Jonathan Woolfson (editor) RENAISSANCE HISTORIOGRAPHY Forthcoming: Jonathan Barry and Owen Davies (editors) WITCHCRAFT STUDIES Palgrave Advances Series Standing Order ISBN 1-4039-3512-2 (Hardback) 1-4039-3513-0 (Paperback) (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order. Please contact your bookseller or, in case of difficulty, write to us at the address below with your name and address, the title of the series and the ISBN quoted above. Customer Services Department, Macmillan Distribution Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, England PPL-UK_PA-McAuliffe_Fm.indd ii 12/20/2008 1:39:25 PM Palgrave Advances in Irish History Edited by Mary McAuliffe Teaching and Research Fellow, Women’s Studies, School of Social Justice, University College Dublin Katherine O’Donnell Head of Women’s Studies, School of Social Justice, University College Dublin Leeann Lane Co-ordinator of Irish Studies, Mater Dei Institute of Education, Dublin City University PPL-UK_PA-McAuliffe_Fm.indd iii 12/20/2008 1:39:25 PM Editorial matter and selection © Mary McAuliffe, Katherine O’Donnell and Leeann Lane 2009 Preface © Nancy Curtin 2009 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2009 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles “Chaz” Bojórquez Interviewed by Karen Mary Davalos on September 25, 27, and 28, and October 2, 2007
    CSRC ORAL HISTORIES SERIES NO. 5, NOVEMBER 2013 CHARLES “CHAZ” BOJÓRQUEZ INTERVIEWED BY KAREN MARY DAVALOS ON SEPTEMBER 25, 27, AND 28, AND OCTOBER 2, 2007 Charles “Chaz” Bojórquez is a resident of Los Angeles. He grew up in East Los Angeles, where he developed his distinctive graffiti style. He received formal art training at Guadalajara University of Art in Mexico and California State University and Chouinard Art Institute in Los Angeles. Before devoting his time to painting, he worked as a commercial artist in the film and advertising industries. His work is represented in major private collections and museums, including the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, and the De Young Museum in San Francisco. Karen Mary Davalos is chair and professor of Chicana/o studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. Her research interests encompass representational practices, including art exhibition and collection; vernacular performance; spirituality; feminist scholarship and epistemologies; and oral history. Among her publications are Yolanda M. López (UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2008); “The Mexican Museum of San Francisco: A Brief History with an Interpretive Analysis,” in The Mexican Museum of San Francisco Papers, 1971–2006 (UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2010); and Exhibiting Mestizaje: Mexican (American) Museums in the Diaspora (University of New Mexico Press, 2001). This interview was conducted as part of the L.A. Xicano project. Preferred citation: Charles “Chaz” Bojórquez, interview with Karen Davalos, September 25, 27, and 28, and October 2, 2007, Los Angeles, California. CSRC Oral Histories Series, no. 5. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Tabled on Wednesday 18 August 2021
    Published: Monday 6 September 2021 Questions tabled on Wednesday 18 August 2021 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Monday 6 September Questions for Written Answer 1 N Bambos Charalambous (Enfield, Southgate): To ask the Attorney General, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that the CPS has adequate resources to prosecute hate crime against the Jewish community (a) on social media and (b) in communities across the UK. (41129) 2 Marsha De Cordova (Battersea): To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, what progress the Government has made on the public inquiry into the Government's response to the covid-19 pandemic, announced on 21 May 2021. (41224) 3 Jo Gideon (Stoke-on-Trent Central): To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, what training his Department (a) makes available and (b) plans to make available for Returning Officers on how to support visually impaired voters. (41351) 4 Jo Gideon (Stoke-on-Trent Central): To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps he plans to take to help ensure that blind and partially sighted people can vote independently in 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flags Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274691563 The Flags Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest Book · December 2014 CITATIONS READS 5 82 6 authors, including: Dominic Bryan Katy Hayward Queen's University Belfast Queen's University Belfast 33 PUBLICATIONS 94 CITATIONS 51 PUBLICATIONS 137 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Peter Shirlow University of Liverpool 109 PUBLICATIONS 1,433 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Brexit and the Border View project devolution View project All content following this page was uploaded by Dominic Bryan on 08 April 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Flag Dispute: Anatomy of a Protest Full Report Paul Nolan Dominic Bryan Clare Dwyer Katy Hayward Katy Radford & Peter Shirlow December 2014 Supported by the Community Relations Council & the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Ireland) Published by Queen’s University Belfast ISBN 9781909131248 Cover image: © Pacemaker Press. 3 Acknowledgements The authors of this report are extremely grateful to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Community Relations Council for funding this research project and its publication. A huge debt of gratitude is also due to those who gave their time to be interviewed, and for the honesty and candour with which they related their experiences - these were often quite emotive experiences. The Institute for Conflict Research (ICR) was commissioned to undertake the interviews presented within this report. These interviews were conducted with great care and skill with ICR capturing many voices which we hope have been represented fairly and accurately within this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Peace of Sorts”: a Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn Mcnamara
    “A Peace of Sorts”: A Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn McNamara A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Australian National University, March 2017 Declaration ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Nicholas Brown who agreed to supervise me back in October 2014. Your generosity, insight, patience and hard work have made this thesis what it is. I would also like to thank Dr Ben Mercer, your helpful and perceptive insights not only contributed enormously to my thesis, but helped fund my research by hiring and mentoring me as a tutor. Thank you to Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Malcolm whose knowledge and experience thoroughly enhanced this thesis. I could not have asked for a better panel. I would also like to thank the academic and administrative staff of the ANU’s School of History for their encouragement and support, in Monday afternoon tea, seminars throughout my candidature and especially useful feedback during my Thesis Proposal and Pre-Submission Presentations. I would like to thank the McClay Library at Queen’s University Belfast for allowing me access to their collections and the generous staff of the Linen Hall Library, Belfast City Library and Belfast’s Newspaper Library for all their help. Also thanks to my local libraries, the NLA and the ANU’s Chifley and Menzies libraries. A big thank you to Niamh Baker of the BBC Archives in Belfast for allowing me access to the collection. I would also like to acknowledge Bertie Ahern, Seán Neeson and John Lindsay for their insightful interviews and conversations that added a personal dimension to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism James
    University of Huddersfield Repository McAuley, James W. and Ferguson, Neil ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism Original Citation McAuley, James W. and Ferguson, Neil (2016) ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28 (3). pp. 561-575. ISSN 0954- 6553 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/27270/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Us & Them Running Heading: US & THEM ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Ulster Loyalist Perspectives on the IRA and Irish Republicanism James W McAuley (University of Huddersfield) Neil Ferguson (Liverpool Hope University) Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to James W. McAuley, Institute for Research in Citizenship and Applied Human Sciences, School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Huddersfield, England, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Lisburn Road, Belfast (Updated May 2021)
    Branch Closure Impact Assessment Closing branch: Lisburn Road 364 Lisburn Road Belfast BT9 6GL Closure date: 23/06/2021 The branch your account(s) will be administered from: Belfast City Branch Information correct as at: February 2021 1 What’s in this brochure The world of banking is changing and so are we Page 3 How we made the decision to close this branch What will this mean for our customers? Customers who need more support Access to Banking Standard (updated May 2021) Bank safely – Security information How to contact us Branch information Page 6 Lisburn Road branch facilities Lisburn Road customer profile (updated May 2021) How Lisburn Road customers are banking with us Page 7 Ways for customers to do their everyday banking Page 8 Other Bank of Ireland branches (updated May 2021) Bank of Ireland branches that will remain open Nearest Post Office Other local banks Nearest free-to-use cash machines Broadband available close to this branch Other ways for customers to do their everyday banking Definition of key terms Page 11 Customer and Stakeholder feedback Page 12 Communicating this change to customers Engaging with the local community What we have done to make the change easier 2 The world of banking is changing and so are we Bank of Ireland customers in Northern Ireland have been steadily moving to digital banking over the past 10 years. The pace of this change is increasing. Since 2017, for example, digital banking has increased by 50% while visits to our branches have sharply declined. Increasingly, our customers are using Post Office services with 52% of over-the-counter transactions now made in Post Office branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Paddy Devlin, the Labour Movement and the Catholic Community
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Parr, Connal (2018) Paddy Devlin, the Labour Movement and the Catholic Community. In: The Contested Identities of Ulster Catholics. Springer, pp. 111-125. ISBN 9783319788036 Published by: Springer URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78804-3_8 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-78804-3_8> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/36889/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) Paddy Devlin: Republican Labour and the Catholic Community The Labour movement tends to clash with Catholicism in vastly differing world-views, concepts of state power, and social change,1 and these battles took place in Northern Ireland as elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • A Process of Analysis
    A process of analysis (1) The Protestant/Unionist/Loyalist community Compiled by Michael Hall ISLAND 107 PAMPHLETS 1 Published February 2015 by Island Publications / Farset Community Think Tanks Project 466 Springfield Road, Belfast BT12 7DW © Michael Hall 2015 [email protected] http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/islandpublications cover photographs © Michael Hall The Project wishes to thank all those who participated in the discussions and interviews from which this publication was compiled. This first part of a three-part project has received financial support from The Reconciliation Fund Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Dublin. Printed by Regency Press, Belfast The Island Pamphlets series was launched in 1993 to stimulate a community-wide debate on historical, cultural, political and socio-economic issues. Most of the pamphlets are edited accounts of discussions undertaken by small groups of individuals – the ‘Community Think Tanks’ – which have embraced (on both a ‘single identity’ and a cross-community basis) Loyalists, Republicans, community activists, women’s groups, victims, cross-border workers, ex-prisoners, young people, senior citizens and others. To date 106 titles have been produced and 190,400 pamphlets have been distributed at a grassroots level. Many of the titles are available for (free) download from http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/islandpublications. 2 Introduction Sixteen years after the signing of the Good Friday Agreement issues surrounding identity, marching and flags in Northern Ireland remain as contentious as ever. These unresolved matters have poisoned political discourse and at times threatened to destabilise the political institutions. Even the Stormont House Agreement (announced in the final days of 2014) in which Northern Ireland’s political parties reached a belated consensus on a range of financial and legacy matters, once again pushed any discussion of identity-related issues further into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement and the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement
    #Agreement20 How to Cite: Campbell, S 2018 ‘We Shall Overcome’? The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement and the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement. Open Library of Humanities, 4(1): 25, pp. 1–25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.259 Published: 24 April 2018 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the double-blind process of Open Library of Humanities, which is a journal published by the Open Library of Humanities. Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Open Access: Open Library of Humanities is a peer-reviewed open access journal. Digital Preservation: The Open Library of Humanities and all its journals are digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS scholarly archive service. Sarah Campbell ‘‘We Shall Overcome’? The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement and the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement’ (2018) 4(1): 25 Open Library of Humanities, DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.259 #AGREEMENT20 ‘We Shall Overcome’? The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement and the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement Sarah Campbell Newcastle University, GB [email protected] While 2018 marks the twentieth anniversary of the signing of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) in Northern Ireland, it also marks the fiftieth anniversary of the civil rights movement and the protests of 1968. One of the key innovations of the Agreement is that it makes issues of rights central to the broader consociational framework, with the entirety of section 6 devoted to ‘Rights, Safeguards and Equality of opportunity.’ This reinforces a perception that the GFA is a culmination of the civil rights movement and its aims; and that the conflict itself was based on issues of rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Oral Evidence: Cross Border Co-Operation on Policing, Security and Criminal Justice After Brexit, HC 766
    Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Oral evidence: Cross border co-operation on policing, security and criminal justice after Brexit, HC 766 Wednesday 27 January 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 27 January 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Simon Hoare (Chair); Scott Benton; Mr Gregory Campbell; Stephen Farry; Mr Robert Goodwill; Claire Hanna; Fay Jones; Ian Paisley; Stephanie Peacock; Bob Stewart. Questions 254 - 349 Witnesses I: Mark McEwan, Assistant Chief Constable, Police Service of Northern Ireland. II. Paul Morgan CBE, Senior Director, Border Readiness Directorate, Border Force; and Steve Rodhouse, Director-General of Operations, National Crime Agency. Examination of Witness Witness: Mark McEwan. Q254 Chair: Good morning, colleagues. Good morning, Assistant Chief Constable. Thank you for joining us this morning for this session of our inquiry on cross-border co-operation on policing, security and criminal justice post-Brexit. You are very welcome and thank you for joining us. I wonder if you might set the scene for us, if you will, by describing what, if any, differences you have noticed since 1 January. Mark McEwan: Good morning. By and large, it is a little too early to say on a lot of these areas. I will come first to justice and home affairs matters. In terms of our legislative vehicles that were discussed previously at this Committee, we maintain the ECRIS system, which translates into UK-CRIS now, so that runs as was, effectively. In terms of Europol, we still have access to SIENA and to Eurojust. The UK has embeddedness in those organisations and we are still able to access the JITs for joint investigation.
    [Show full text]