DOCSLIB.ORG

88000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 1 of 8)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
88000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 1 of 8) 88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 1 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 10 0113 GARCIA RIVER 1 MEN 1 18.5 10 0120 ELK CREEK 1 MEN 1 31.35 10 0149 SOUTH FORK EEL RIVER 1 MEN 1 104.96 27 0019 REDWOOD CREEK 4 MRN 1 6.02 27 0022 LAGUNITAS CREEK OVERFLOW 4 MRN 1 28.39 27 0024 LAGUNITAS CREEK OVERFLOW 4 MRN 1 28.56 27 0025 ELLIS CREEK 4 MRN 1 34.97 27 0056 TOMASINI CANYON 4 MRN 1 29.85 34 0015 WEST PACIFIC AVENUE UC 4 SF 1 6.18 34 0021 ALEMANY BLVD OC 4 SF 1 R.11 36 0024 CAPITOLA AVENUE OC 5 SCR 1 12.93 36 0066 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD OC 5 SCR 1 15.82 36 0069R ROUTE 1 NB / 17 SEPARATION 5 SCR 1 17.02 36 0071L SAN LORENZO RIVER 5 SCR 1 17.41 44 0012 GRANITE CANYON 5 MON 1 64.33 49 0042 SANTA MARIA RIVER 5 SLO 1 .01 49 0053 ARROYO LAGUNA 5 SLO 1 R59.89 49 0108 SOUTH MORRO BAY OC 5 SLO 1 28.82 49 0123 STENNER CREEK 5 SLO 1 17.05 52 0012 LITTLE SYCAMORE CREEK 7 VEN 1 1.23 52 0040 VENTURA OH 7 VEN 1 21.54 53 0316 MAIN STREET OC 7 LA 1 35.07 53 2725 WESTCHESTER PARKWAY OC 7 LA 1 28.5 55 0119 MORO CREEK 12 ORA 1 11.9 55 1106 LAGUNA CANYON CHANNEL 12 ORA 1 9.39 53 0063 SLIDE CANYON 7 LA 2 28.58 53 0086 WOODWARDIA CANYON 7 LA 2 29.55 53 0088 SIDEHILL VIADUCT 7 LA 2 29.08 02 0038 PATTERSON CREEK 2 SIS 3 24.26 05 0055 STUART FORK 2 TRI 3 43.93 28 0105 UTILITIES UNDERCROSSING 4 CC 4 24.97 29 0045 OLD RIVER SR 4 10 SJ 4 .01 30 0036 WEST BRANCH CHEROKEE CREEK 10 CAL 4 16.15 38 0039 DUCK CREEK 10 STA 4 .88 38 0041 HOODS CREEK 10 STA 4 7.28 37 0074 SARATOGA CREEK 4 SCL 9 4.85 37 0078 SARATOGA CREEK 4 SCL 9 6.7 36 0046 SAN LORENZO RIVER 5 SCR 9 7.76 36 0047 SAN LORENZO RIVER 5 SCR 9 7.87 36 0050 MARSHALL CREEK 5 SCR 9 9.85 36 0051 BOULDER CREEK 5 SCR 9 13.11 36 0052 SAN LORENZO RIVER 5 SCR 9 13.61 36 0054 KINGS CREEK 5 SCR 9 15.49 88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 2 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 53 0392 CESAR CHAVEZ AVE OC 7 LA 10 0 20 0025 STUART CREEK 4 SON 12 30.8 20 0030 HOOKER CREEK 4 SON 12 33.31 20 0206L S101-E12 CONNECTOR UC 4 SON 12 R15.9 20 0238 SANTA ROSA CREEK 4 SON 12 T18.51 23 0022 WELL CREEK 4 SOL 12 22.91 33 0162 BROADWAY TERRACE UC 4 ALA 13 9.07 53 0871L SANTIAGO ROAD UC 7 LA 14 R50.75 53 0871R SANTIAGO ROAD UC 7 LA 14 R50.75 53 1541 AGUA DULCE ROAD UC 7 LA 14 39.85 22 0019 CACHE CREEK 3 YOL 16 3.87 22 0024 TAYLOR CREEK 3 YOL 16 20.14 37 0029 SIDEHILL VIADUCT 4 SCL 17 5.43 37 0059 MADRONE DRIVE UC 4 SCL 17 1.14 36 0069F S17-S1 CONNECTOR SEPARATION 5 SCR 17 .01 10 0101 CHAMBERLAIN CREEK 1 MEN 20 17.29 15 0024 NORTH WILLIAMS OH 3 COL 20 R21.85 16 0010 DRY CREEK 3 YUB 20 13.9 17 0052 BENNETT STREET UC 3 NEV 20 R13.11 18 0002 SUTTER COUNTY EXTENSION CANAL 3 SUT 20 12.17 18 0003 WADSWORTH CANAL 3 SUT 20 9.76 18 0005 SUTTER BYPASS 3 SUT 20 4.22 55 0366 KNOTT AVENUE UC 12 ORA 22 R2.69 55 0384L TUSTIN AVENUE OC 12 ORA 22 R12.87 55 0428G E22-N605&N405/22 CONNECTOR SEP 12 ORA 22 R.37 52 0319L TIERRA REJADA ROAD UC 7 VEN 23 R10.16 33 0363K 42ND STREET UC 4 ALA 24 R2.33 33 0363S 42ND STREET UC 4 ALA 24 R2.33 30 0049 NORTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER 10 CAL 26 38.31 21 0005 GARNETT CREEK 4 NAP 29 39.08 21 0016 SULPHUR CREEK 4 NAP 29 28.43 21 0017 YORK CREEK 4 NAP 29 29.29 21 0111 GARNETT CREEK BRANCH 4 NAP 29 38.96 08 0068 DEER CREEK 2 TEH 32 12.91 12 0051 PINE CREEK OVERFLOW 3 BUT 32 1.75 42 0034 POSO CANAL 6 FRE 33 70.63 50 0071 SANDY CREEK 6 KER 33 19.51 50 0186 MCKITTRICK WASH 6 KER 33 35.89 50 0195 WASP WASH 6 KER 33 37.89 52 0065 SAN ANTONIO CREEK 7 VEN 33 7.58 52 0084 ADOBE CANYON 7 VEN 33 39.03 52 0233F S33-S101 CONNECTOR UC 7 VEN 33 .02 38 0020 SALADO CREEK 10 STA 33 13.94 88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 3 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 38 0068 WESTLEY WASTEWAY 10 STA 33 18.92 39 0112 QUINTO BYPASS 10 MER 33 23.35 39 0113 PARNELL BYPASS 10 MER 33 21.47 05 0075 RATTLESNAKE CREEK 2 TRI 36 19.11 08 0090 EAST SAND SLOUGH 2 TEH 36 41.95 54 0015 HATHAWAY CREEK 8 SBD 38 26.58 53 0113 SAN GABRIEL RIVER 7 LA 39 17.82 53 0117 PEJSA CANYON 7 LA 39 22.17 45 0007 KINGS RIVER 6 KIN 41 32.26 45 0019R NORTH FORK KINGS RIVER 6 KIN 41 R47.16 42 0226R SOUTH FRESNO VIADUCT 6 FRE 41 R22.11 22 0041 SYCAMORE SLOUGH 3 YOL 45 .13 50 0523 MAIN FLOOD CANAL 6 KER 46 32.8 13 0005 DOWNIE RIVER 3 SIE 49 16.75 17 0005 SOUTH WOLF CREEK 3 NEV 49 3.61 19 0035 NORTH FORK AMERICAN RIVER 3 PLA 49 .01 30 0017 SAN ANTONIO CREEK 10 CAL 49 14.09 30 0018 SAN DOMINGO CREEK 10 CAL 49 12.51 30 0019 ANGELS CREEK 10 CAL 49 7.16 30 0020 SIX MILE CREEK 10 CAL 49 6.51 40 0028 DELONG CREEK 10 MPA 49 6.18 24 4117 RAMP A17 - WB HWY 50 TO SB I-5 3 SAC 50 L.27 24 4125 RAMP A25 - EB HWY 50 TO SB I-5 3 SAC 50 L.25 24 4717 RAMP G17 - S RIVER ROAD OFFRAMP 3 YOL 50 2.79 25 0044 ECHO SUMMIT SIDEHILL VIADUCT 3 ED 50 67.3 22 0129S WEST SACRAMENTO OFF-RAMP SEP 3 YOL 50 2.44 24 0004L SACRAMENTO RIVER VIADUCT 3 SAC 50 L.01 24 0004R SACRAMENTO RIVER VIADUCT 3 SAC 50 L.01 24 4708 RAMP G8 - S RIVER ROAD ONRAMP 3 YOL 50 2.86 24 4715 RAMP G15 - JEFFERSON BLVD OFFRAMP 3 YOL 50 2.65 53 1954 ARROW HIGHWAY UC 7 LA 57 R10.74 53 1998 SAN JOSE WASH FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL 7 LA 57 R7.3 53 2149R GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE UC 7 LA 57 R4.49R 53 2164 PATHFINDER ROAD OC 7 LA 57 R3.17 49 0091 TROUT CREEK 5 SLO 58 3.08 50 0005 WEST SIDE CANAL 6 KER 58 24.08 39 0087 SOUTH BRANCH INGALSBE SLOUGH 10 MER 59 31.25 53 1784 HACIENDA BLVD UC 7 LA 60 15.93 56 0066L BEAUMONT OH 8 RIV 60 30.24 54 0988 MWD AQUEDUCT (SIPHON) 8 SBD 62 91.75 56 0727 MWD AQUEDUCT (SIPHON) 8 RIV 62 82.05 46 0098 PACKWOOD CREEK 6 TUL 63 5.76 46 0100 ST JOHNS RIVER 6 TUL 63 10.65 88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 4 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 16 0002 DRY CREEK 3 YUB 65 2.21 57 0427L WOODSIDE AVENUE UC 11 SD 67 R2.67 57 0427R WOODSIDE AVENUE UC 11 SD 67 R2.67 09 0009 NORTH FORK FEATHER RIVER 2 PLU 70 16.54 09 0055 BIG GRIZZLY CREEK 2 PLU 70 R78.64 12 0061 OAK KNOB DRAW 3 BUT 70 8.34 53 0346 EAST SPADRA OH 7 LA 71 1.2 55 0064 SAN JUAN CANYON 12 ORA 74 13.29 57 0094 HATFIELD CREEK 11 SD 78 40.38 57 0161 BALLENA CREEK 11 SD 78 45.01 56 0607 RANGE CREEK 8 RIV 79 R8.94 57 0014 CHIHUAHUA CREEK 11 SD 79 49.9 57 0056 SWEETWATER RIVER 11 SD 79 4.97 35 0001 CORDILLERAS CREEK 4 SM 82 5.15 35 0104 BELMONT CREEK 4 SM 82 24.01 37 0092 UNIVERSITY AVENUE OC 4 SCL 82 25.88 23 0035 MINER SLOUGH 4 SOL 84 12.09 33 0036 ALAMEDA CREEK (RICHMOND BRIDGE) 4 ALA 84 13.33 33 0043 ARROYO DE LA LAGUNA 4 ALA 84 17.22 35 0044 WEST UNION CREEK 4 SM 84 19.89 37 0199F STEVENS CREEK (S85-W237) 4 SCL 85 R22.2 37 0315 VIRGINIA STREET OC 4 SCL 87 4.86 26 0002 ROCKY CREEK 10 AMA 88 16.66 26 0019 JACKSON CREEK 10 AMA 88 3.09 31 0001 EAST FORK CARSON RIVER 10 ALP 89 13.3 31 0002 MARKLEEVILLE CREEK 10 ALP 89 14.69 31 0003 WEST FORK CARSON RIVER 10 ALP 89 21.31 53 2237S COMPTON CREEK OFF-RAMP BOH 7 LA 91 R10.28 55 0287 GILBERT STREET UC 12 ORA 91 .72 33 0370 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD UC 4 ALA 92 R5.12 35 0162 WEST HILLSDALE BLVD UC 4 SM 92 R9.38 04 0061 SLATE CREEK 1 HUM 96 29.92 04 0288 TISH TANG SIDEHILL VIADUCT #1 1 HUM 96 8.26 02 0035 DILLON CREEK 2 SIS 96 R16.13 58 0200 ASH MAIN CANAL 11 IMP 98 38.14 08 0008 SOUTH BRANCH OF NORTH FORK MILL CREEK 2 TEH 99 13.96 08 0010 SUNSET CANAL 2 TEH 99 15.55 08 0013 BUTLER SLOUGH 2 TEH 99 19.54 08 0019 SALT CREEK 2 TEH 99 24.84 08 0075 SHORT CREEK 2 TEH 99 3.67 08 0076 LAKE DRAW 2 TEH 99 2.35 08 0077 LONG CREEK 2 TEH 99 7.53 08 0078 LOS MOLINOS CREEK 2 TEH 99 12.59 88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 5 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 12 0004 BIGGS EXTENSION CANAL 3 BUT 99 9.21 12 0122 GOLD RUN CREEK 3 BUT 99 19.51 24 0016 STRAWBERRY CREEK 3 SAC 99 16.35 24 0020L COSUMNES RIVER 3 SAC 99 8.4 24 0028L SOUTH LAGOON CREEK 3 SAC 99 4.91 24 0030L NORTH CHANNEL DRY CREEK 3 SAC 99 .13 24 0045L LAGOON CREEK 3 SAC 99 4.98 41 0035 LITTLE DRY CREEK 6 MAD 99 5.88 42 0172 STANISLAUS STREET OC 6 FRE 99 21.01 46 0033R CROSS CREEK 6 TUL 99 44.89 50 0134 LERDO CANAL 6 KER 99 37.22 50 0223 SHERWOOD AVENUE OC 6 KER 99 49.3 50 0252 PLANZ ROAD OC 6 KER 99 21.6 29 0006 MOSHER SLOUGH 10 SJ 99 24.41 29 0104 ARMSTRONG ROAD OC 10 SJ 99 27.5 29 0159 LODI AVENUE OC 10 SJ 99 30.52 38 0007K CERES MAIN CANAL 10 STA 99 R10.03 38 0074 PINE STREET OH 10 STA 99 R11.3 39 0017 TURLOCK CANAL (LATERAL #6) 10 MER 99 R35.04 39 0018L WEBBER CANAL 10 MER 99 19.49 39 0127 APPLEGATE ROAD OC 10 MER 99 22.76 04 0023L JACOBY CREEK 1 HUM 101 84.5 04 0079R ARCATA OH 1 HUM 101 87.84 04 0083 JONES SLOUGH 1 HUM 101 88.87 04 0170 MURRAY ROAD OC 1 HUM 101 R92.99 04 0173 HILLER ROAD OC 1 HUM 101 R91.99 04 0177 SALMON CREEK ROAD OC 1 HUM 101 25.01 04 0207 JORDAN ROAD SEPARATION (101/254) 1 HUM 101 R45.9 10 0097 LONG VALLEY CREEK 1 MEN 101 61.32 10 0098 LONG VALLEY CREEK 1 MEN 101 63.47 10 0199L ACKERMAN CREEK 1 MEN 101 26.66 10 0199R ACKERMAN CREEK 1 MEN 101 26.66 10 0268 CUMMISKEY SIDEHILL VIADUCT 1 MEN 101 2.47 10 0004 MCNAB CREEK 1 MEN 101 15.94 20 0061L ARATA LANE UC 4 SON 101 30.67 20 0061R ARATA LANE UC 4 SON 101 30.67 27 0052 GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE 4 MRN 101 L.01 27 0080 FREITAS PARKWAY OC 4 MRN 101 13.71 27 0084 PACHECO CREEK OC 4 MRN 101 16.64 27 0097 IRWIN CREEK 4 MRN 101 11.2 34 0062 LINCOLN BLVD UC 4 SF 101 0 34 0069 TOLL PLAZA UC 4 SF 101 9.85 37 0034 STEVENS CREEK 4 SCL 101 48.04 88,000-POUND RESTRICTED BRIDGES (Page 6 of 8) BRIDGE NUMBER BRIDGE NAME DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POSTMILE 37 0037 GUADALUPE RIVER 4 SCL 101 40.19 37 0039 COYOTE CREEK 4 SCL 101 36.69 37 0217 HELLYER AVENUE OC 4 SCL 101 30.1 34 0088 BAYSHORE VIADUCT 4 SF 101 4.12 43 0010 SAN JUAN CREEK 5 SBT 101 4.93 44 0181R JOLON UC 5 MON 101 R41.95R 44 0292 ELKHORN SLOUGH TRIBUTARY 5 MON
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012
    Russian River Watershed Directory September 2012 A guide to resources and services For management and stewardship of the Russian River Watershed © www.robertjanover.com. Russian River & Big Sulphur Creek at Cloverdale, CA. Photo By Robert Janover Production of this directory was made possible through funding from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Conservation. In addition to this version of the directory, you can find updated versions online at www.sotoyomercd.org Russian River Watershed Directory version September 2012 - 1 - Preface The Sotoyome Resource Conservation District (RCD) has updated our Russian River Watershed directory to assist landowners, residents, professionals, educators, organizations and agencies interested in the many resources available for natural resource management and stewardship throughout the Russian River watershed. In 1997, The Sotoyome RCD compiled the first known resource directory of agencies and organization working in the Russian River Watershed. The directory was an example of an emerging Coordinated Resource Management and Planning (CRMP) effort to encourage community-based solutions for natural resource management. Since that Photo courtesy of Sonoma County Water Agency time the directory has gone through several updates with our most recent edition being released electronically and re-formatting for ease of use. For more information or to include your organization in the Directory, please contact the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District Sotoyome Resource Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000
    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Sustaining Our Water Resources
    SUSTAINING OUR WATER RESOURCES Watersheds are nested drainages, incorporating the entire land surface that collects water flowing to a geographic point. Different maps and planning documents refer to the Laguna channel and the Laguna watershed in dif- ferent ways, sometimes splitting off the Santa Rosa and Mark West Creeks as separate drainages. Within this plan, we define the Laguna watershed as the area that incorporates all these sub-basins, and when this definition needs to be underscored the phrase “greater Laguna watershed” is applied. This watershed definition is more ecologically appropriate, reflecting the biological and physical properties of the system. However, for regulatory purposes, the Laguna, Santa Rosa Creek and Mark West Creeks are split into separate drainages, as discussed below. Water quality concerns in the Laguna cannot be easily separated from the issues related to the Laguna’s hydrology and water dynamics. Restoring the Laguna’s water resources will require integrated research, planning and collaboration. HYDROLOGY The Laguna watershed has a complex and diverse hydrology—cool-water high-gradient creeks in the upper watershed flow down the hillsides to High gradient creeks, vernal pools, slow moving the broad, flat, vernal pool-dotted Santa Rosa Plain, meeting the warm, channel slow-moving Laguna main channel, that flows northward to join the Rus- sian River. During very large storms, the Russian River backs up into the Laguna’s low-gradient basin near Windsor and Mark West Creeks: this alleviates flooding in the lower Russian River valley, and strongly affects the Laguna ecosystem. In part because of these back flows, and in part Backflow, sediment retention, disconnected because of localized topographic constrictions, the Laguna does not have ponds scouring floods, and retains much sediment within its channels and flood- plains.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Water Bodies
    Attachment A: Detailed list of receiving water bodies within the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Control District boundaries under the jurisdiction of Regional Water Quality Control Boards One and Two This list of watercourses in the San Francisco Bay Area groups rivers, creeks, sloughs, etc. according to the bodies of water they flow into. Tributaries are listed under the watercourses they feed, sorted by the elevation of the confluence so that tributaries entering nearest the sea appear they first. Numbers in parentheses are Geographic Nantes Information System feature ids. Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County north of Bodega Head, listed from north to south:W The Gualala River and its tributaries • Gualala River (253221): o North Fork (229679) - flows from Mendocino County. o South Fork (235010): Big Pepperwood Creek (219227) - flows from Mendocino County. • Rockpile Creek (231751) - flows from Mendocino County. Buckeye Creek (220029): Little Creek (227239) North Fork Buckeye Crcck (229647): Osser Creek (230143) • Roy Creek (231987) • Soda Springs Creek (234853) Wheatfield Fork (237594): Fuller Creek (223983): • Sullivan Crcck (235693) Boyd Creek (219738) • North Fork Fuller Creek (229676) South Fork Fuller Creek (235005) Haupt Creek (225023) • Tobacco Creek (236406) Elk Creek (223108) • )`louse Creek (225688): Soda Spring Creek (234845) Allen Creek (218142) Peppeawood Creek (230514): • Danfield Creek (222007): • Cow Creek (221691) • Jim Creek (226237) • Grasshopper Creek (224470) Britain Creek (219851) • Cedar Creek (220760) • Wolf Creek (238086) • Tombs Crock (236448) • Marshall Creek (228139): • McKenzie Creek (228391) Northern Sonoma Coast Watercourses which feed into the Pacific Ocean in Sonoma County between the Gualala and Russian Rivers, numbered from north to south: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • To Sit in the Shade on a Fine Day and Look Upon Verdure Is the Most Perfect Refreshment.” —Jane Austen
    8/19/2011 Draft HISTORIC OVERVIEW OPEN SPACE ELEMENT IN TRODUCTION GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS OPEN SPACE APPENDIXES AREA PLANS “To sit in the shade on a fine day and look upon verdure is the most perfect refreshment.” —Jane Austen Introduction....................................................................................................................................140 Changes.Since.1988....................................................................................................................141 Definitions........................................................................................................................................142 Open.Space.Purposes.................................................................................................................142 SPECIFIC PLANS Open.Space.Types........................................................................................................................143 Easements.(Open.Space,.Conservation,.and.Scenic)...................................................146 Open.Space.Inventory................................................................................................................148 Goal.OS1,.Policies,.and.Strategies..........................................................................................160 TOWN OF WOODSIDE GENERAL PLAN 2012 139 8/19/2011 Draft Introduction The Woodside Planning Area contains significant open space areas important not only to local residents but to Woodside is blessed to have an abundance of open space. the larger
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the California Freshwater Shrimp
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan forthe California Freshwater Shrimp (Syncaris pw~jflca Holmes 1895) Total Postorbital Length Carapace Length Rostrum Length CL RL First Antenna Pleopod I (PerelopodI) Second Antenna Figure 1. The California freshwater shrimp, Syncaris pac~fiCa. CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispac~fica Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Manager, Califo~~~i’evada Operations Office Region 1, U.S. wish and Wildlife Service Date: CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SHRIMP (Syncarispa~flca Holmes 1895) RECOVERY PLAN Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon 1998 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regionai Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion ofrecovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211
    National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.211 and the following DOI, USGS, 1:500,000 (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Critical habitat scale hydrologic unit maps: State of is designated to include all river Oregon, 1974 and State of California, reaches accessible to listed coho salm- 1978 which are incorporated by ref- on between Cape Blanco, Oregon, and erence. This incorporation by reference Punta Gorda, California. Critical habi- was approved by the Director of the tat consists of the water, substrate, Federal Register in accordance with 5 and adjacent riparian zone of estuarine U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies and riverine reaches (including off- of the USGS publication and maps may channel habitats) in hydrologic units be obtained from the USGS, Map Sales, and counties identified in Table 6 of Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225. Copies may this part. Accessible reaches are those be inspected at NMFS, Protected Re- within the historical range of the ESU sources Division, 525 NE Oregon that can still be occupied by any life Street—Suite 500, Portland, OR 97232– stage of coho salmon. Inaccessible 2737, or NMFS, Office of Protected Re- sources, 1315 East-West Highway, Sil- reaches are those above specific dams ver Spring, MD 20910, or at the Na- identified in Table 6 of this part or tional Archives and Records Adminis- above longstanding, naturally impass- tration (NARA). For information on able barriers (i.e., natural waterfalls in the availability of this material at existence for at least several hundred NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: http:// years).
    [Show full text]
  • Green Valley & Dutch Bill
    Green Valley & Dutch Bill Watershed Update Green Valley & Dutch Bill Watershed Update Integrated Groundwater and Surface Water Study for Watershed Restoration Planning Background The Dutch Bill and Green Valley/Atascadero Creek watersheds provide some of the best remaining habitat for endangered coho salmon in the greater Russian River watershed. Low stream flows during the summer months are an important factor affecting the survival and recovery of the species. Salmon require sufficient water in the creeks for migrating in from the ocean to their breeding habitat, spawning, developing eggs, rearing young, and migrating back out of the streams to the ocean. Juvenile coho salmon live in creeks for over a year before migrating to the ocean, so they must survive through the summer dur- ing periods of low stream flow (Figure 1). In light of recent drought conditions, ongoing climate change, and an increasing demand for water, developing strategies to protect and increase stream flows while having enough water to meet human needs is critically im- portant for sustaining coho in these watersheds. A four-year scientific study has been completed by the Gold Ridge Resource Conservation District and O'Connor Environmental to gain a better understanding of how stream flows vary across the watersheds and over time, how various natural and man-made factors in- fluence these flows, and what actions can be taken to improve flows and habitat condi- tions for coho. The study provides a wealth of information and tools for understanding watershed conditions and assisting local stakeholders in sustainably managing water re- sources and restoring coho populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Uses of the SFAN Water Bodies
    Appendix A. Beneficial Uses of the SFAN Water Bodies 67 Beneficial Uses of individual the SFAN water bodies as determined by the San Francisco Bay RWQCB (with modifications/additions by the SFAN staff in an April 2003 Memo to the RWQCB) are listed in the table below. Sets of water bodies grouped together with similar shading are located within the same greater watershed. Chalone Creek is located within the jurisdiction of the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board; however, it is not included in there list of streams. Potential beneficial uses are indicated by “P”, existing beneficial uses are indicated by “E”. Park AGR COLD COMM EST FRSH GWR IND MAR MIGR MUN NAV PROC RARE REC1 REC2 SHEL SPWN WARM WI Tomales Bay PORE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E GOGA Lagunitas Creek GOGA E E E E E E E E E E E Bear Valley Creek PORE E E E P E E E Haggerty Gulch PORE E E E E E E Olema Creek PORE E E E E E E E E E Pacific Ocean PORE E E E E E E E E E E E GOGA Santa Maria Creek PORE E E E P E E E E Coast Creek PORE E P P E E E E Alamere Creek PORE P E E E Crystal Lake PORE P E E E E Arroyo Hondo PORE E P E P E E E Limantour Estero PORE E E E E E E P E E E E Glenbrook Creek PORE E E E E E E P E E E Muddy Hollow PORE E E E E E E P E E E Kehoe Lagoon PORE E E E E Abbott’s Lagoon PORE E E E E E Drakes Estero PORE P E E E E E E E E E East Schooner Ck.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Conservation Plan November 2012 5-2 Environmental Consequences
    Environmental Consequences 5-1 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES This section analyzes the effects of issuing the ITPs and implementation of the HCP on the physical, biological, and socioeconomic environment. It describes the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of three alternatives: the Proposed Action, No Action, and HCP for CTS Only. The list of activities covered by the Proposed Action (i.e., Covered Activities) is provided in Section 3 and in the HCP (Appendix B). The direct and indirect effects of the Proposed Action and two alternatives on the physical environment are addressed in Section 5.1; on the biological environment in Section 5.2; on the socioeconomic environment in Section 5.3; and on environmental justice in Section 5.4. A summary comparison of effects of the alternatives is provided in Table 5-8, near the end of the section. Direct effects are caused by the action and occur at the same time and place. Indirect effects are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. They may include the physical effects of population growth or changes in land use. The possible cumulative effects on each resource are evaluated in Section 5.5. Cumulative effects are the incremental effects of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative effects can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time. Global climate change, for example, is addressed in this section.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Clean Water Institute ANNUAL REPORT 2006
    ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Community Clean Water Institute Community Clean Water Institute is dedicated to promoting and protecting clean water and public health by identify- ing water pollution, advocating for sound water policies, and providing information to the public. Dear Friends, Board of Directors Sonoma County is one of the most beautiful places in the world as far as nature is concerned. Our rivers, streams, springs, and forested watersheds provide life-giving Nels Worden abundant pure water that helps to sustain life on the planet. Community Clean Water Judith Olney Institute would like to thank our team of volunteer water monitors who have been test- Don Frank ing the quality of water in our creeks Lynn Hamilton and streams for over 7 years. Margaret Howe 2006 started out with the Russian River reminding us of both its power and vulnerability. It was a wild time here on the Laguna where we sampled Staff sewage over-flows as they passed by Sarah Shaeffer our office in Sebastopol. This picture Program Director shows a sunnier, cleaner testing ses- Robert Wilson sion on the Laguna this past summer. SSU Intern We are delighted to announce the return of Sarah Shaeffer as the new Director of CCWI. Sarah received her Sarah’s first day back at water monitoring this July at the summer bridge on the Laguna de Santa Rosa with Master of Public Health from Emory summer intern Andra Stoddard. Technical Advisors University, focusing on Global Environmental Health. Sarah brings knowledge and experience from her studies and Nels Worden research in Micronesia where she learned of the immense tragedies in public health due Stephen Fuller-Rowell to contaminated water and poor wastewater management in much of the developing world.
    [Show full text]