DOCSLIB.ORG

March 29, 2011 at 9:45 Am (Eastern Time)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
March 29, 2011 at 9:45 Am (Eastern Time) HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 29, 2011 at 9:45 a.m. (Eastern time) OBJECTION DEADLINE: March 22, 2011 at 4:00 p.m.. (Eastern time) John Lewis Mealer, pro per (pro se) 6333 Gardenia Lane Show Low, Arizona 85901 [email protected], 928-532-8191 CREDITOR/CLAIMANT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., ) Chapter 11 Case No. ) f/k/a General Motors Corp., et al. ) 09-50026 (REG) ) Debtor ) Jointly Administered ) ) ) ) ) (Creditor's Principal Brief) ) CREDITOR'S RESPONSE, OBJECTION and MOTION TO DENY THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN DEBTOR'S OBJECTION, DISAGREEMENT and MOTION TO DENY ENTRY OF ORDER DISALLOWING and EXPUNGING ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM NO. 70792 FILED BY JOHN L MEALER Creditor/Claimant/Plaintiff Mealer's Response, Disagreement, Objection and Motion is based on the attached Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed and timely served concurrently all pleadings and papers on file herein and such pleadings as filed in the Arizona District Court Case No: 3:10-cv-08172-JWS, which is integral to this complaint and attached hereto as Exhibits, and upon such oral and documentary evidence as may be presented at a hearing if necessary on this [responsive] principal brief Motion To Deny the Relief Requested in Debtor's Objection and Motion To Deny Entry of Order Disallowing and Expunging Administrative Claim No. 70792 Filed By John L Mealer.. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Relief Requested........................................................................................................... 2 II. Jurisdiction …............................................................................................................... 5 III. Preliminary Statement (Background of Mealer's Claims)............................................ 6 IV. Debtor's liability is clear and concise............................................................................. 7 V. Internet Postings (Doctrine of Accord and Satisfaction Improperly Applied).................9 VI. Background …............................................................................................................... 16 1. These Chapter 11 Cases …................................................................................ 16 A. Exceptions Debtor(s) MLC, NGMCO (“GM”) bankruptcy protection. 16 1). July 10, 2009 …........................................................................ 16 2). Permitted Encumbrances …...................................................... 16 B. Mealer's First filing in these Ch. 11 cases …........................................ 21 C. Mealer's Adversary Proceeding …........................................................ 22 D. Mealer's Lawsuit in Arizona State Court and Arizona District Court... 25 E. Mealer's Administrative Proof of Claim (“APC”)................................ 27 VII. Argument ….................................................................................................................. 28 VIII. Sheer Speculation vs Inferential Allegations .….......................................................... 32 A. Standing …............................................................................................ 32 B. Cause …................................................................................................ 32 IX. Conclusion ….............................................................................................................. (38) X. Motion to Deny Entry of Order Disallowing and Expunging Administrative Claim no. 70792 Filed by John L. Mealer …............................................................... 39 XI. AFFIDAVIT …............................................................................................................. 39 XII. Certificate of Service and Service List ......................................................................... 40, 41 (i) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Pages(s) 4A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure §1082 (3d ed. 2010) … 22 15 U.S.C. § 1291 et seq......................................................................................................................... 30 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(1)(B). …............................................................................................................... 39 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), (O), and § 157(b)(5) …............................................................................... 5 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1), Id. § 157(b)(3), Id. § 157(c)(2) First Circuit (1996) …................................................................................................................ 5 49 U.S.C. §§ 11341-11342 (1982)......................................................................................................... 30 Amini v Oberlia Coll., 259 F.3d 493, 502 (6th Cir. 2001))............................................................................................9, Arizona Constitution in Article 18, Section 3.................................................................................... 34 ARS § 20-455 Defamation …................................................................................................................. 6 Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. at 602, 603 …............................................................................................................ 39 Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585, 596 n.19 (1985) …............................................................................16-21, 28, 34 Averitt, [A.F.S., 767 F.2d at 972 Commission's Policy Statement, 108 F.T.C.A., At 362], 70 Geo.L.J. At 246...................................................................................................16-21, 29, 34 Bassett v NCAA, 28 F.3d 426, 430 (6th Cir. 2008) ….........................................................................................9, Bell Atl. Corp v Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1969 (2007)........................................................................................................ 9 Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 291 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 (1980)..........12, 13, 16-21, 28, 34 Bethel v. New York Transit Authority, 1998 N.Y. Int. 0113 (October 15, 1998).......................................................................7, 8, 12, 35 Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready, 457 U.S. 465, 478 nn. 12-13 (1982) ….................................................................................... 34 (ii.) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Pages(s) Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982)........................................................................................................... 22 Broad v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., Black’s Law Dictionary, [reasonable care] Gardner B.A.,2004, p. 1061), 642 F.2d 929, 961-62 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 965, 102 S.Ct. 506, 70 L.Ed.2d 380 (1981); ….....................................................................................................................7, 8, 12, 35 Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 222 (1993)...........................................................................................16-21, 28, 34 Brown v. Kendall, Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts. §288C. 60 Mass. 292 (1850)..................................................................................................................... 9 Car Carriers, Inc. v Ford Motor Co., 745.F2d 1101. 1106 (7th Cir. 1984).....................................................................................6, 9, 33 Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLC, 148 F.3d 1080, 1087 (D.C. Cir. 1998). …......................................................................14-24, 26, 30, 31 City of Tempe v. Pilot Properties, Inc., 22 Ariz. App. 356, 363, 527 P.2d 515, 522 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974) (Slander of Title).. 13, 36 Clinkscales v. Carver, Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts. §288C. 22 Cal.2d 72 (1934)..................................................................................................................... 9 Cook v. Avien, Inc., Black’s Law Dictionary, [duty of reasonable care] Gardner B. A., 2004, p. 1061), 573 F.2d 685, 692 (1st Cir.1978);.................................................................................7, 8, 12, 35 County of Tulare v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 1247, 1253. …................................................................................................. 31 Doe v Friendfinder Network, Inc., 540 F Supp.2d. 288 (D.N.H. 2008). ….............................................................................. 38, 39 Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451, 480 at 488 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting at 488)...............................16-21, 28, 34 Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp v Barnes 259 B.R. 328 (S.D.) 28 USC § 157(d);....................................................................................... 5 Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway, Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts. §288C. 649 N.E.2d 1323 (Ill. 1995).......................................................................................................... 9 F. Harper & F. James, Jr., The Law of Torts 1367 (1956). ….................................................7, 8, 12, 35 (iii.) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Pages(s) Fed. R. Civ P. Rule 41(a)(2) ….............................................................................................................. 5 Fedie v. Travelodge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sumter, SC 29150
    IN SPORTS: Lady Barons to face CN in 3A state tourney B1 PANORAMA Step Off! Performers from 3 states will compete in the 5th annual SERVING SOUTH CAROLINA SINCE OCTOBER 15, 1894 Lemira Golden Steppers show WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2017 75 CENTS C1 Family, puppy survive blaze Council approves parkway rezoning BY JIM HILLEY [email protected] Sumter City Council ap- proved an ordinance to allow multi-family apartments on the south side of Patriot Park- way near Deschamps Road at Tuesday’s regular meeting. Some residents of the area led a coordinated campaign against the proposal, and members of the public who at- tended the meeting were asked by opponents to hold up signs during council’s vote urging council to vote against the or- dinance. Martin Graf, an Air Force retiree, was one of the people passing out signs. Graf said he and other area residents were promised the area would remain agricultur- al and single dwellings when he purchased a house there. Members of council pointed SAMMY WAY / THE SUMTER ITEM out they could find no record Flames engulf a home at 104 Church St. on Tuesday morning. of any such promises and that the city would not have been involved in any agreement Tuesday morning fire guts Victorian-era Church Street home when that area was still in Sumter County. Councilman David Mer- BY ADRIENNE SARVIS inside the structure to put chant said he reached out to [email protected] out more flames. former councilmen and was He said one resident was told no such promises were After thinking everything inside the house when the made.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-14-698, Troubled Asset Relief Program: Government's Exposure
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees August 2014 TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM Government’s Exposure to Ally Financial Lessens as Treasury’s Ownership Share Declines GAO-14-698 August 2014 TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM Government’s Exposure to Ally Financial Lessens as Treasury’s Ownership Share Declines Highlights of GAO-14-698, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found As part of its Automotive Industry The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) reduced its ownership stake in Ally Financing Program, funded through the Financial Inc. (Ally Financial) from 74 percent in October 2013, to 16 percent as Troubled Asset Relief Program of June 30, 2014. As shown in the figure below, the pace of Treasury’s reduction (TARP), Treasury provided $17.2 in its ownership share of Ally Financial accelerated in 2013 and corresponds with billion of assistance to Ally Financial two key events. First, in November 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal (formerly known as GMAC). Ally Reserve System (Federal Reserve) did not object to Ally Financial’s resubmitted Financial is a large financial holding 2013 capital plan, which allowed Ally Financial to repurchase preferred shares company, the primary business of from Treasury and complete a private placement of common shares. Second, in which is auto financing. December 2013 the bankruptcy proceedings of Ally Financial’s mortgage subsidiary, Residential Capital LLC (ResCap), were substantially resolved. The TARP’s authorizing legislation confirmed Chapter 11 plan broadly released Ally Financial from any and all legal mandates that GAO report every 60 claims by ResCap and, subject to certain exceptions, all other third parties, in days on TARP activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Consumer Credit State of Oklahoma
    Department of Consumer Credit State of Oklahoma Helping protect Oklahoma Consumers through the regulation of consumer credit sales and consumer loans. 2015 Annual Report Scott Lesher Mary Fallin Administrator Governor Ruben Tornini Todd Lamb Deputy Administrator Lt. Governor STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT November 18, 2015 The Honorable Mary Fallin Governor, State of Oklahoma 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Room 212 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 The Honorable Brian Bingman President Pro Tempore Oklahoma State Senate 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Room 422 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 The Honorable Jeffrey Hickman Speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd., Room 401 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 Dear Governor Fallin, President Pro Tempore Bingman, and Speaker Hickman: On behalf of the Oklahoma Commission on Consumer Credit and the staff, we are pleased to submit the 2015 Annual Report for the Oklahoma Department of Consumer Credit and the Oklahoma Commission on Consumer Credit. This report contains information regarding the activities of the Department, the Commission, and the industries regulated by the Department. The Department of Consumer Credit annually licenses or registers over 10,000 credit-related organizations including supervised lenders, mortgage brokers/loan originators, mortgage lenders, deferred deposit lenders, credit service organizations, consumer litigation funders, pawn brokers, rent-to-own dealers, health spas, precious metal dealers, acceptance companies and businesses that finance goods
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Credit Update – January 4, 2021
    U.S. Credit Update – January 4, 2021 • Travel, Energy and Materials Dominated Q4 Excess Returns • Credit, Equity Divergence in the Energy Sector • The Automotive Industry Looks for a Fast Start to 2021 • Regional Banks in Focus • Total Return & Issuance Recap A Division of Benjamin Breitholtz and Peter Forbes datascience.arborresearch.com 1 Travel, Energy and Materials Dominated Q4 Excess Returns Some of the most distressed industries in the investment grade credit space posted the best performance in the fourth quarter. The imminent return of more ambitious travel fueled the outperformance of airlines, lodging and finance companies (primarily aircraft leasing). The hardest-hit industries in the energy sector, independent energy and oil field services, posted excess returns north of 8% for the quarter. High-flyers aside, materials and manufacturing outshined similar-duration peers as the manufacturing economy reignited. © 2020 Arbor Research & Trading, LLC. All Rights Reserved 12-14-2020 2 Travel, Energy and Materials Dominated Q4 Excess Returns We still have concerns about the growth trajectory in the best performing industries in the energy sector. And there are new uncertainties in the outlook for travel. But we remain confident in the outlook for the industrial and manufacturing economy as a lower-beta bet on global economic momentum. The chart shows 3-month excess returns over benchmark Treasuries for select industries. Metals & mining extended its margin of outperformance throughout December and should see tailwinds in the first quarter. For more, see our recent posts: Global Synchronized Growth on the Horizon Industrial and Precious Metals are Still Heating Up © 2020 Arbor Research & Trading, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Investments December 31, 2020 (Unaudited)
    Schedule of Investments December 31, 2020 (Unaudited) City National Rochdale Government Money Market Fund Description Face Amount (000) Value (000) Description Face Amount (000) Value (000) U.S. Government Agency Obligations [44.9%] 0.135%, VAR United States FFCB Secured Overnight 0.183%, VAR ICE LIBOR Financing Rate+0.025%, 02/26/21 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 USD 1 Month+0.035%, 01/26/21 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 0.180%, VAR United States 0.213%, VAR ICE LIBOR Secured Overnight USD 1 Month+0.070%, Financing Rate+0.070%, 08/12/22 50,000 50,000 06/24/21 50,000 49,998 0.200%, VAR United States FNMA Secured Overnight 0.470%, VAR United States Financing Rate+0.090%, Secured Overnight 07/15/21 50,000 50,000 Financing Rate+0.360%, 01/20/22 50,000 50,000 FHLB 0.130%, 06/17/21 25,000 24,999 0.500%, VAR United States 0.169%, VAR ICE LIBOR Secured Overnight USD 1 Month+0.015%, Financing Rate+0.390%, 04/15/22 50,000 50,000 07/13/21 50,000 50,000 0.160%, VAR United States 0.350%, VAR United States Secured Overnight Secured Overnight Financing Rate+0.050%, Financing Rate+0.240%, 05/05/22 25,000 25,000 07/16/21 25,000 25,000 0.420%, VAR United States 0.310%, VAR United States Secured Overnight Secured Overnight Financing Rate+0.310%, Financing Rate+0.200%, 05/09/22 50,000 50,000 09/24/21 50,000 50,000 0.280%, VAR United States Total U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT CONTENTS MISSION STATEMENT 1 ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT 2 COMMISSION ON CONSUMER CREDIT 8 DEPARTMENT STAFF 9 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 10 MORTGAGE LENDERS 11 MORTGAGE BROKERS 23 MORTGAGE LOAN ORIGINATORS 31 SUPERVISED LENDERS 213 DEFERRED DEPOSIT LENDERS 228 RENT-TO-OWN 231 PAWNBROKER’S 235 PRECIOUS METAL & GEM DEALERS 247 CREDIT SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 252 HEALTH SPAS 255 NOTIFICATIONS 262 CONSUMER LITIGATION FUNDERS 331 COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 333 Scott Lesher Administrator Email: [email protected] Telephone: (405)-521-3653 Department of Consumer Credit 3613 N.W. 56th Street, Suite 240 · Oklahoma City, OK 73112 Telephone: (405)-521-3653 · Fax: (405)-521-6740 Statewide Consumer Line: (800)-448-4904 Website: https://www.ok.gov/okdocc MISSION STATEMENT We protect and educate consumer buyers, lessees and borrowers against unfair practices, and are fair and impartial in the regulation of consumer credit transactions in Oklahoma. 1 ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT THE ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT INCLUDES INFORMATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 14A O.S. § 6-104 (5), AND IS EXPANDED TO INCLUDE OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT. The Department of Consumer Credit annually licenses or registers over 13,051 credit-related organizations including mortgage lenders, mortgage brokers, mortgage loan originators, supervised lenders, deferred deposit lenders, rent-to-own dealers, pawnbroker’s, precious metal and gem dealers, credit service organizations, health spas, consumer litigation funders, and notifications in relation to acceptance companies and businesses that finance goods and services for Oklahoma consumers. There are 6,355 licensee offices which are periodically investigated or examined.
    [Show full text]
  • GM End of Lease Guide
    END-OF-LEASE GUIDE GOOD THINGS SHOULD NEVER COME TO AN END. As the end of your current lease with GM Financial draws near, we’d like to thank you for your business, and we hope that you’ve had an excellent driving experience in your General Motors vehicle. To help guide you through the end-of-lease process, we’ve created this step-by- step guide. Or, visit gmfinancial.com/EndofLease. What should you do with your current TABLE OF CONTENTS leased GM vehicle? You have several options from which to choose: Your Lease-End Options 1 • Purchase or lease a new GM vehicle Trade in Your Vehicle 2 • Purchase your current leased vehicle Turn in Your Vehicle 2 • Turn in your leased vehicle Want to continue enjoying the GM driving experience? Select Your Next GM Vehicle 3 GM has many new and exciting models available. Check your mail in the coming weeks because you may become Schedule Your Inspection 4 eligible to receive incentives towards the purchase or lease of a new GM vehicle. Review Your Vehicle’s Condition 6 Frequently Asked Questions 11 What will you be driving this time next year? Contact Us 12 GM is consistently developing new and exciting models for our customers. Visit GM.com to check out Wear-and-Tear Card 13 new vehicles and determine which one fits your needs. YOUR LEASE-END OPTIONS Buick Envision Chevrolet Cruze Cadillac XT5 OPTION 1: OPTION 2: OPTION 3: TURN IN YOUR GM VEHICLE PURCHASE YOUR TURN IN YOUR GM VEHICLE AND PURCHASE OR LEASE LEASED GM VEHICLE Return the vehicle to the GM A NEW GM VEHICLE You can purchase your leased vehicle dealership where it was leased.* Are you ready for your next at any time during your lease period, Remember to bring your GM vehicle? Visit your nearest or you may do so near the end of your owner’s manual, extra set of GM dealer to test drive the lease.
    [Show full text]
  • Ally Financial Inc.(GOM) 10-K
    Ally Financial Inc. (GOM) 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filed on 02/25/2011 Filed Period 12/31/2010 Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 1-3754 ALLY FINANCIAL INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 38-0572512 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 200 Renaissance Center P.O. Box 200 Detroit, Michigan 48265-2000 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (866) 710-4623 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act (all listed on the New York Stock Exchange): Title of each class 6.00% Debentures due April 1, 2011 7.35% Notes due August 8, 2032 10.00% Deferred Interest Debentures due December 1, 2012 7.25% Notes due February 7, 2033 10.30% Deferred Interest Debentures due June 15, 2015 7.375% Notes due December 16, 2044 7.30% Public Income Notes (PINES) due March 9, 2031 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • GM Financial Privacy Notice 04.07.2020
    Rev. 6 / 20 FACTS WHAT DOES GM FINANCIAL DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Why? Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. What? The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: . Social Security number and income . account balances and payment history . credit history and credit scores How? All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers' personal information; the reasons GM Financial chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. Does GM Financial Can you limit this Reasons we can share your information share? sharing? For our everyday business purposes— such as to process your transactions, maintain Yes No your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus For our marketing purposes— Yes No to offer our products and services to you For joint marketing with other financial companies Yes No For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes— Yes No information about your transactions and experiences For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes— Yes Yes information about your creditworthiness For our affiliates to market to you Yes Yes For nonaffiliates to market to you Yes Yes To limit . Call toll- free 1-888-249-2763 – our menu will prompt you through your choices or .
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Address A+ FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (512)302-6800 ATTN: LOAN PAYOFF 6420 US HWY
    PAYOFF ADDRESS Lender Phone Number(s) Physical Address A+ FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (512)302-6800 ATTN: LOAN PAYOFF 6420 US HWY 290 E AUSTIN, TX 78723 ALLY AUTO FINANCE/GMAC (888)925-2559 ATTN: PAYMENT PROCESSING 6716 GRADE LN BLDG 9 STE 910 LOUISVILLE, KY 40213-3416 AMERICREDIT (800)365-3635 4001 EMBARCADERO DR ARILNGTON, TX 76014 AMPLIFY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (512)836-5901 ATTN: LOAN PAYOFF 2608 BROCKTON DR. STE 105 AUSTIN, TX 78758 AUDI FINANCIAL (800)428-4034 1401 FRANKLIN BLVD LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048 AUSTIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (512)444-6419 1900 WOODWARD AUSTIN, TX 78741 AUSTIN TELCO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (512)302-5555 ATTN: LOAN PAYOFF 8929 SHOAL CREEK BLVD STE 100 AUSTIN, TX 78757 BANK OF AMERICA (800)215-6195 9000 SOUTHSIDE BLVD BLVD BLDG 600 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256 BANK OF THE WEST (800)827-7500 1450 TREAT BLVD WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 BRAZOS VALLEY SCHOOL CREDIT UNION (281)391-2149 438 F M 1463 KATY, TX 77494 CAPITAL CREDIT UNION (512)477-9465 1718 LAVACA ST FAX: (512)477-9466 AUSTIN, TX 78701 CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE (800)946-0332 ATTN: PAYMENT PROCESSING 2525 CORPORATE PLACE 2ND FLOOR STE 250 MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 CAPITOL CREDIT UNION (800)486-4228 11902-A BURNET RD AUSTIN, TX 78758 CARMAX AUTO FINANCE (800)925-3612 ATTN: PAYOFF DEPARTMENT 225 CHASTAIN MEADOWS COURT STE 210 KENNESAW, GA 30144 CENTER ONE FINANCIAL (866)636-8575 190 J IM MORAN BLVD DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33442 CHASE AUTO FINANCE (800)336-6675 14800 FRY RD 1ST FLOOR TX-1300 FT WORTH, TX 76155 CITIFINANCIAL AUTO (800)486-1750 1500 BOLTONFIELD ST COLUMBUS, OH 43228 COMPASS BANK (800)239-1996 701 32ND ST SOUTH BIRMINGHAM, AL 35233 CREDI T UNION OF TEXAS (972)63-9497 4600 ROSS AVE DALLAS, TX 75204 DRIVE TIME ACCEPTANCE (800)967-8526 7300 E.
    [Show full text]
  • General Motors Corporation Securities Litigation 06-MD-01749-Third
    Case 2:06-md-01749-GER Document 13 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 191 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MDL No. 1749 IN RE GENERAL MOTORS CORP. Master Case No. 06-md-1749 SECURITIES LITIGATION Hon. Gerald E. Rosen This Document Relates to: 2:06-cv-12258-GER _______________________________________/ 2:06-cv-12259-GER JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS LABATON SUCHAROW & RUDOFF LLP 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 Tel: 212 907-0700 Fax: 212 818-0477 MURRAY, FRANK & SAILER LLP 275 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212 682-1818 Fax: 212 682-1892 Case 2:06-md-01749-GER Document 13 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 191 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS ..................................................................................................................1 A. PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT ............................................2 B. PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT............................................5 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE......................................................................................................5 III. PARTIES...............................................................................................................................................6 A. LEAD PLAINTIFF ...................................................................................................................6 B. ADDITIONAL NAMED PLAINTIFFS ..............................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • State of Illinois State Universities Retirement System
    State of Illinois State Universities Retirement System Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2018 Performed as Special Assistant Auditors for the Auditor General, State of Illinois State Universities Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table of Contents Schedule Page(s) State Universities Retirement System Officials 1 Management Assertion Letter 2 Compliance Report Summary 3 Independent Accountant’s Report on State Compliance, on Internal Control Over Compliance, and on Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes 5 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 9 Schedule of Findings Current Findings – State Compliance 11 Prior Findings Not Repeated 14 Financial Statement Report The System’s financial statement report for the year ended June 30, 2018, which includes the Independent Auditor’s Report, Management Discussion and Analysis, Basic Financial Statements and Notes to the Basic Financial Statements, Required Supplementary Information Other than Management Discussion and Analysis, Supplementary Information, and the Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Basic Financial Statements performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards has been issued separately. Supplementary Information for
    [Show full text]