Phragmatobia Assimilans
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015
Wisconsin Entomological Society N e w s I e t t e r Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015 Monitoring and Management - A That is, until volunteer moth surveyor, Steve Sensible Pairing Bransky, came onto the scene. Steve had By Beth Goeppinger, Wisconsin Department done a few moth and butterfly surveys here ofN atural Resources and there on the property. But that changed in 2013. Armed with mercury vapor lights, Richard Bong State Recreation Area is a bait and a Wisconsin scientific collector's heavily used 4,515 acre property in the permit, along with our permission, he began Wisconsin State Park system. It is located in surveying in earnest. western Kenosha County. The area is oak woodland, savanna, wetland, sedge meadow, He chose five sites in woodland, prairie and old field and restored and remnant prairie. savanna habitats. He came out many nights Surveys of many kinds and for many species in the months moths might be flying. After are done on the property-frog and toad, finding that moth populations seemed to drift fence, phenology, plants, ephemeral cycle every 3-5 days, he came out more ponds, upland sandpiper, black tern, frequently. His enthusiasm, dedication and grassland and marsh birds, butterfly, small never-ending energy have wielded some mammal, waterfowl, muskrat and wood surprising results. Those results, in turn, ducks to name a few. Moths, except for the have guided us in our habitat management showy and easy-to-identify species, have practices. been ignored. Of the 4,500 moth species found in the state, Steve has confirmed close to 1,200 on the property, and he isn't done yet! He found one of the biggest populations of the endangered Papaipema silphii moths (Silphium borer) in the state as well as 36 species of Catocola moths (underwings), them. -
CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties. -
An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes. -
Increased Cave Use by Butterflies and Moths
International Journal of Speleology 50 (1) 15-24 Tampa, FL (USA) January 2021 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Increased cave use by butterflies and moths: a response to climate warming? Otto Moog 1, Erhard Christian 2*, and Rudolf Eis3 1Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 2 Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendel 33 Str., 1180 Vienna, Austria 3Waldegg 9a, 2754 Waldegg, Austria Abstract: Between 2015 and 2019, the list of Lepidoptera from “cave” habitats (i.e., proper caves, rock shelters and artificial subterranean structures) in Austria grew from 17 to 62 species, although the effort of data collection remained nearly constant from the late 1970s onwards. The newly recorded moths and butterflies were resting in caves during daytime in the the warm season, three species were also overwintering there. We observed Catocala elocata at 28 cave inspections, followed by Mormo maura (18), Catocala nupta (7), Peribatodes rhomboidaria, and Euplagia quadripunctaria (6). More than half of the species have been repeatedly observed in caves in Austria or abroad, so their relationship with such sites is apparently not completely random. Since the increase of records in Austria coincided with a considerable rise in the annual number of hot days (maximum temperatures ≥30°C) from 2015 onwards, we interpret the growing inclination of certain Lepidoptera towards daytime sheltering in caves as a behavioral reaction to climate warming. Keywords: Lepidoptera, cave use, diurnal retreat, refuge-site preference, climate change Received 22 October 2020; Revised 26 December 2020; Accepted 29 December 2020 Citation: Moog O., Christian E. -
Redalyc.Arctiidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Da Estação Biológica
Biota Neotropica ISSN: 1676-0611 [email protected] Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Brasil Gianluppi Ferro, Viviane; Rezende Diniz, Ivone Arctiidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) da Estação Biológica de Boracéia (Salesópolis, São Paulo, Brasil) Biota Neotropica, vol. 7, núm. 3, septiembre-diciembre, 2007, pp. 331-338 Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Campinas, Brasil Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199114292032 Como citar este artigo Número completo Sistema de Informação Científica Mais artigos Rede de Revistas Científicas da América Latina, Caribe , Espanha e Portugal Home da revista no Redalyc Projeto acadêmico sem fins lucrativos desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa Acesso Aberto Arctiidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) da Estação Biológica de Boracéia (Salesópolis, São Paulo, Brasil) Viviane Gianluppi Ferro1,3 & Ivone Rezende Diniz2 Biota Neotropica v7 (n3) – http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v7n3/pt/abstract?inventory+bn03107032007 Recebido em 20/06/07 Versão reformulada recebida em 13/09/07 Publicado em 16/10/07 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília – UnB, CP 04457, CEP 70919-970, Brasília, DF, Brasil 2Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília – UnB, CEP 70910-900, Brasília, DF, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected] 3Autor para correspondência: Viviane Gianluppi Ferro, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ferro, VG. & Diniz, IR. Arctiidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of the Boracéia Biological Station (Salesópolis, São Paulo, Brazil). Biota Neotrop. Sep/Dez 2007 vol. 7, no. 3 http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v7n3/pt/abstra ct?inventory+bn03107032007. ISSN 1676-0603. A checklist of the Arctiidae moth species with occurrence in the Boracéia Biological Station (EBB) is presented. -
Invertebrates of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve (Fsc) and Prawle Point (National Trust)
CLARK & BECCALONI (2018). FIELD STUDIES (http://fsj.field-studies-council.org/) INVERTEBRATES OF SLAPTON LEY NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE (FSC) AND PRAWLE POINT (NATIONAL TRUST) RACHEL J. CLARK AND JANET BECCALONI Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. In 2014 the Natural History Museum, London organised a field trip to Slapton. These field notes report on the trip, giving details of methodology, the species collected and those of notable status. INTRODUCTION OBjectives A field trip to Slapton was organised, funded and undertaken by the Natural History Museum, London (NHM) in July 2014. The main objective was to acquire tissues of UK invertebrates for the Molecular Collections Facility (MCF) at the NHM. The other objectives were to: 1. Acquire specimens of hitherto under-represented species in the NHM collection; 2. Provide UK invertebrate records for the Field Studies Council (FSC), local wildlife trusts, Natural England, the National Trust and the National Biodiversity Network (NBN) Gateway; 3. Develop a partnership between these organisations and the NHM; 4. Publish records of new/under-recorded species for the area in Field Studies (the publication of the FSC). Background to the NHM collections The NHM is home to over 80 million specimens and objects. The Museum uses best practice in curating and preserving specimens for perpetuity. In 2012 the Molecular Collections Facilities (MCF) was opened at the NHM. The MCF houses a variety of material including botanical, entomological and zoological tissues in state-of-the-art freezers ranging in temperature from -20ºC and -80ºC to -150ºC (Figs. 1). As well as tissues, a genomic DNA collection is also being developed. -
Reptiles and Amphibians
A good book for beginners is Himmelman’s (2002) book “Discovering Moths’. Winter Moths (2000) describes several methods for By Dennis Skadsen capturing and observing moths including the use of light traps and sugar baits. There are Unlike butterflies, very little fieldwork has a few other essential books listed in the been completed to determine species suggested references section located on composition and distribution of moths in pages 8 & 9. Many moth identification northeast South Dakota. This is partly due guides can now be found on the internet, the to the fact moths are harder to capture and North Dakota and Iowa sites are the most study because most adults are nocturnal, and useful for our area. Since we often identification to species is difficult in the encounter the caterpillars of moths more field. Many adults can only be often than adults, having a guide like differentiated by studying specimens in the Wagners (2005) is essential. hand with a good understanding of moth taxonomy. Listed below are just a few of the species that probably occur in northeast South Although behavior and several physiological Dakota. The list is compiled from the characteristics separate moths from author’s personnel collection, and specimens butterflies including flight periods (moths collected by Gary Marrone or listed in Opler are mainly nocturnal (night) and butterflies (2006). Common and scientific names diurnal (day)); the shapes of antennae and follow Moths of North Dakota (2007) or wings; each have similar life histories. Both Opler (2006). moths and butterflies complete a series of changes from egg to adult called metamorphosis. -
“Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 149:Generic 69–88 placement (2011) of the Neotropical species of “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae)... 69 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2382 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Generic placement of the Neotropical species of “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae), with a remarkable matrivorous species from the Peruvian Andes B. Christian Schmidt1,†, Josef J. De Freina2,‡ 1 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6 2 Eduard-Schmid Str. 10, D-81541, Munich, Germany † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C3C5392A-EBF8-41B9-99BE-364A8C2FBB7F ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D77A3D39-F4A4-4116-8279-5F6534826BE8 Corresponding authors: B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Josef J. De Freina ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Lafontaine | Received 10 September 2011 | Accepted 15 November 2011 | Published 24 November 2011 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6476A2E7-14C0-4E6E-B21E-4B63375BF605 Citation: Schmidt BC, De Freina JJ (2011) Generic placement of the Neotropical species of “Phragmatobia” (Erebidae, Arctiinae), with a remarkable matrivorous species from the Peruvian Andes. In: Schmidt BC, Lafontaine JD (Eds) Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths III. ZooKeys 149: 69–88. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.149.2382 Abstract Phragmatobia Stephens is briefly reviewed and a diagnosis is provided. The South American species cur- rently placed in Phragmatobia Stephens are revised to two new genera, Andesobia Schmidt and De Freina, gen. n., and Patagobia Schmidt and De Freina, gen. n. (subtribe Spilosomina). Both Andesobia and Patagobia exhibit adaptations to high altitude habitats, including micropterous females in Andesobia (Patagobia females are unknown) and diurnal flight of males. -
Carposina Sasakii
Nano-computed Tomography (nano-CT) • Nano-computed Tomography (nano-CT) • • Nano-computed Tomography (nano-CT) • • • Nano-computed Tomography (nano-CT) • • • • • • • Tiger moth – Melese Iso-surface rendering Tiger moth – Melese Iso-surface rendering Diagnostic structures in situ Accurate measurements Type specimens Really small specimens Diagnostic structures in situ Accurate measurements Type specimens Really small specimens Peach fruit moth - Carposina sasakii 1.0 mm • • • DoodleBug Biology (@DoodleBugBio) Evolution of defensive ultrasound production in moths Kawahara & Breinholt (2014) Evolution of defensive ultrasound production in moths • Evolution of defensive ultrasound production in moths • • 0.5 mm Pyralidae/Crambidae– dorsal thoracic scales Axel Hausmann, SNSB (2010) Barber et al. (in prep.) Pyralidae/Crambidae– dorsal thoracic scales Barber et al. (in prep.) Erebidae: Calpinae – ventral abdominal scales 0.5 mm 50 μm • • • • • • MAYBE!!! Marthula (Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Abdomen moves during ultrasound production, but no correlated structures observed with regular microscopy or SEM Dan Janzen (2008) Notodontidae – Marthula Iso-surface rendering Ommatidia Flight muscles Gut contents Notodontidae – Marthula Volumetric rendering Search for less dense cuticle – possible evidence of ultrasound production Search for less dense cuticle – possible evidence of ultrasound production Nano-CT offers new avenues for exploring insect biodiversity and morphological variation Useful tool for developing new hypotheses Dan Janzen (2008) Kawahara -
(C-ELISA) Based Sero-Prevalence of Bluetongue Virus (BTV) on Small Ruminants in Selected Areas of Wolyita, Southern Ethiopia
& My gy co lo lo ro g i y V Yilma and Mekonnen, Virol-mycol 2015, 4:2 Virology & Mycology DOI: 10.4172/2161-0517.1000148 ISSN: 2161-0517 Research Article Open Access Competitive Enzyme Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay (c-ELISA) Based Sero- Prevalence of Bluetongue Virus (BTV) on Small Ruminants in Selected Areas of Wolyita, Southern Ethiopia Melese Yilma* and Mesfin Mekonnen Areka Agricultural research center, Po Box 79, Areka, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Melese Yilma, Areka Agricultural research center, Po Box 79, Areka, Ethiopia, Tel: +251 910 75 51 90; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: Sep 18, 2015; Accepted date: Nov 30, 2015; Published date: Dec 7, 2015 Copyright: ©2015 Yilma M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The objective of the present study is to assess the sero-prevalence and associated risk factors for small ruminants’ bluetongue infection in selected agro-ecology of woliyta zone, southern Ethiopia. Serum samples were collected randomly from the accessed small ruminates and screened for detection of BTV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA). A total of 476 serum samples were tested and 196 (41.17%) were positive for bluetongue virus antibodies. A prevalence rate ranging from 26.53% for the midland altitude to 73.47% for the lowland was recorded. To disease associated risk factor age, and location was recorded using multivariate analysis of logistic regression model. -
Moths of Alaska
Zootaxa 3571: 1–25 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C1B7C5DB-D024-4A3F-AA8B-582C87B1DE3F A Checklist of the Moths of Alaska CLIFFORD D. FERRIS1, JAMES J. KRUSE2, J. DONALD LAFONTAINE3, KENELM W. PHILIP4, B. CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT5 & DEREK S. SIKES6 1 5405 Bill Nye Avenue, R.R.#3, Laramie, WY 82070. Research Associate: McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Colorado State Uni- versity, Ft. Collins, CO. cdferris @uwyo.edu 2 USDA Forest Service, State & Private Forestry, Forest Health Protection, Fairbanks Unit, 3700 Airport Way, Fairbanks, AK; Research Associate: University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK. [email protected] 3 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K. E. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6. [email protected] 4 1590 Becker Ridge Rd., Fairbanks, AK, 99709. Senior Research Scientist, Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK; Research Associate: University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK; National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. [email protected] 5 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K. E. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6. [email protected] 6 University of Alaska Museum, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6960. [email protected] Abstract This article represents the first published complete checklist of the moth taxa, resident and occasional, recorded to date for Alaska. -
Arctiini Leach,[1815](Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae) of the Brazilian
12 2 1852 the journal of biodiversity data 9 March 2016 Check List LISTS OF SPECIES Check List 12(2): 1852, 9 March 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.2.1852 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors Arctiini Leach, [1815] (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae) of the Brazilian Amazon. I — Subtribe Phaegopterina Kirby, 1892 José A. Teston1* and Viviane G. Ferro2 1 Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Naturais da Amazônia (PPGRNA) e Instituto de Ciências da Educação (ICED) – Laboratório de Estudos de Lepidópteros Neotropicais (LELN). Rua Vera Paz s/n, CEP 68040-255, Santarém, PA, Brazil 2 Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ecologia. Caixa Postal 131, CEP 74001-970, Goiânia, GO, Brazil * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: This study aims to identify and record and in the synthesis of pheromones (Kitching and Arctiini specimens from the Brazilian Amazon, as well Rawlins 1999). They are found worldwide, but mainly as upgrade the existing lists regarding this tribe. The in the Neotropics, where there are 1,720 known species material included in this study consisted of specimens (Vincent and Laguerre 2014). from collections, and insects collected in the field, as The Amazon biome extends from the Atlantic Ocean well as a literature review,. There are 469 species of to the eastern slopes of the Andes, to approximately 600 Phaegopterina, including 52 are new recorded species, m (Ab’Saber 1977). It covers part of nine countries in for the Brazilian Amazon.