Steppe C.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Steppe C.Pdf THE PROPAGATION AND EVALUATION OF BALDUINA ANGUSTIFOLIA AND PARONYCHIA ERECTA FOR LANDSCAPE USE IN FLORIDA By CARLEE STEPPE A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 © 2019 Carlee Steppe To the people who try to make the world a better place ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my adviser Dr. Sandra Wilson for her guidance and mentorship over the high and low points of the last few years as well as her constant kindness and support. I thank my committee members Dr. Héctor Pérez and Dr. Mack Thetford for their direction and honesty that has always led me to grow as a scientist and helped create a better overall project. I thank Dr. Mike Kane for his ingenuity, knowledge and usage of lab space for micropropagation. I thank Dr. Edzard van Santen for his statistical assistance and constant patience. I thank Victor Vankus, Sarah Garvin and Kayla Herriman for their seed knowledge and advice. For technical assistance, I thank Mark Kann, Keri Druffel and Brian Owens. I thank my fellow lab members (Gabriel Campbell, Christopher Harchick, Jackson Jablonski, Heather Kalaman, Zhaoyuan Lian and Julia Rycyna) for their assistance in data collection as well as their friendship and understanding. Finally, I thank every person who helped to shape me over my academic and professional career. It takes a village to train a scientist and I shall be eternally grateful to mine. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 9 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 13 Justification for Research ........................................................................................ 13 Importance of Balduina angustifolia ........................................................................ 15 Importance of Paronychia erecta ............................................................................ 17 2 SEED GERMINATION AND EXAMINATION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL DORMANCY OF BALDUINA ANGUSTIFOLIA ....................................................... 20 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 25 Move-along ....................................................................................................... 25 Effect of GA3 on Germination ........................................................................... 27 Seed Germination Data Analysis ............................................................................ 28 Move-along ....................................................................................................... 30 GA3 ................................................................................................................... 31 Results .................................................................................................................... 31 Move-along ....................................................................................................... 31 GA3 ................................................................................................................... 32 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 33 Move-along ....................................................................................................... 33 GA3 ................................................................................................................... 35 3 SEED GERMINATION OF PARONYCHIA ERECTA .............................................. 46 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 46 Experimental Design and Data Analysis ................................................................. 48 Results .................................................................................................................... 49 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 49 4 FIELD PERFORMANCE OF BALDUINA ANGUSTIFOLIA AND PARONYCHIA ERECTA ................................................................................................................. 55 Performance of three populations of Balduina angustifolia ..................................... 57 Materials and Methods: B. angustifolia ............................................................. 58 5 Plant material ............................................................................................. 58 Site conditions ............................................................................................ 59 Visual quality, flowering and growth index ................................................. 59 Experimental design and data analysis ...................................................... 60 Results/Discussion: B. angustifolia ................................................................... 61 Performance of Paronychia erecta at two sites outside of its native range in FL .... 63 Materials and Methods: P. erecta ..................................................................... 63 Plant material ............................................................................................. 63 Site conditions ............................................................................................ 64 Visual quality, flowering and growth index ................................................. 65 Experimental design and data analysis ...................................................... 65 Results/Discussion: P. erecta ........................................................................... 66 5 IN VITRO ESTABLISHMENT AND MULTIPLICATION OF PARONYCHIA ERECTA ................................................................................................................. 84 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 87 Stage 0-Seed Collection ................................................................................... 87 Stage I-Establishment ...................................................................................... 88 Stage II-Multiplication ....................................................................................... 89 Data Analysis .......................................................................................................... 90 Results .................................................................................................................... 90 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 93 6 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 104 Balduina angustifolia ............................................................................................. 104 Paronychia erecta ................................................................................................. 105 LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 107 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................... 118 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1 Pre-germination viability, average final germination, and weeks to final germination of Balduina angustifolia from three seed sources at four alternating seasonal temperatures and two move-along treatments .................. 37 2-2 Number of plants seed were collected from for Balduina angustifolia GA3 study from four locations Mean height (cm), width (cm) and growth index (cm) (width + height/2) ........................................................................................ 38 2-3 Average final germination, pre- and post-germination viability, and time to 0.50 of final germination proportion (T50FG) of Balduina angustifolia from four seed sources treated with four GA3 concentrations (ppm). ................................ 38 2-4 Effects of location (Loc), GA3 concentration and the interaction of location and GA3 concentration on final germination and time to 0.50 of final germination (T50FG) on germination of Balduina angustifolia. ............................ 39 3-1 Number plants seeds were collected from, approximate number of calyxes post-cleaning and fill (%) of those calyxes determined through x-ray analysis of 100 calyxes for three north FL locations of Paronychia erecta. ...................... 51 3-2 Pre-germination viability, cumulative final germination proportion (4 pseudo- reps of 50 seeds) and days to 0.50 of final germination proportion (T50FG) of Paronychia erecta from three Florida locations treated with four seasonal temperatures for 4 weeks. .................................................................................. 51 3-3 Effects of location, temperature and the interaction of location and temperature on final germination and time to 0.50
Recommended publications
  • Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve
    Plant Species List for Bob Janes Preserve Scientific and Common names obtained from Wunderlin 2013 Scientific Name Common Name Status EPPC FDA IRC FNAI Family: Azollaceae (mosquito fern) Azolla caroliniana mosquito fern native R Family: Blechnaceae (mid-sorus fern) Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern native Woodwardia virginica Virginia chain fern native R Family: Dennstaedtiaceae (cuplet fern) Pteridium aquilinum braken fern native Family: Nephrolepidaceae (sword fern) Nephrolepis cordifolia tuberous sword fern exotic II Nephrolepis exaltata wild Boston fern native Family: Ophioglossaceae (adder's-tongue) Ophioglossum palmatum hand fern native E I G4/S2 Family: Osmundaceae (royal fern) Osmunda cinnamomea cinnamon fern native CE R Osmunda regalis royal fern native CE R Family: Polypodiaceae (polypody) Campyloneurum phyllitidis long strap fern native Phlebodium aureum golden polypody native Pleopeltis polypodioides resurrection fern native Family: Psilotaceae (whisk-fern) Psilotum nudum whisk-fern native Family: Pteridaceae (brake fern) Acrostichum danaeifolium giant leather fern native Pteris vittata China ladder break exotic II Family: Salviniaceae (floating fern) Salvinia minima water spangles exotic I Family: Schizaeaceae (curly-grass) Lygodium japonicum Japanese climbing fern exotic I Lygodium microphyllum small-leaf climbing fern exotic I Family: Thelypteridaceae (marsh fern) Thelypteris interrupta hottentot fern native Thelypteris kunthii widespread maiden fern native Thelypteris palustris var. pubescens marsh fern native R Family: Vittariaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinators in Peril: a Systematic Status Review of North American
    POLLINATORS in Peril A systematic status review of North American and Hawaiian native bees Kelsey Kopec & Lori Ann Burd • Center for Biological Diversity • February 2017 Executive Summary hile the decline of European honeybees in the United States and beyond has been well publicized in recent years, the more than 4,000 species of native bees in North W America and Hawaii have been much less documented. Although these native bees are not as well known as honeybees, they play a vital role in functioning ecosystems and also provide more than $3 billion dollars in fruit-pollination services each year just in the United States. For this first-of-its-kind analysis, the Center for Biological Diversity conducted a systematic review of the status of all 4,337 North American and Hawaiian native bees. Our key findings: • Among native bee species with sufficient data to assess (1,437), more than half (749) are declining. • Nearly 1 in 4 (347 native bee species) is imperiled and at increasing risk of extinction. • For many of the bee species lacking sufficient population data, it’s likely they are also declining or at risk of extinction. Additional research is urgently needed to protect them. • A primary driver of these declines is agricultural intensification, which includes habitat destruction and pesticide use. Other major threats are climate change and urbanization. These troubling findings come as a growing body of research has revealed that more than 40 percent of insect pollinators globally are highly threatened, including many of the native bees critical to unprompted crop and wildflower pollination across the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Floristic Studies of Georgian Sandhill Ecosystems Reveals a Dynamic Composition of Endemics and Generalists James M
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern University Honors Program Theses 2017 Comparative Floristic Studies of Georgian Sandhill Ecosystems Reveals a Dynamic Composition of Endemics and Generalists James M. Long Honors College John Schenk Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the Biology Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Long, James M. and Schenk, John, "Comparative Floristic Studies of Georgian Sandhill Ecosystems Reveals a Dynamic Composition of Endemics and Generalists" (2017). University Honors Program Theses. 247. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/247 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comparative Floristic Studies of Georgian Sandhill Ecosystems Reveals a Dynamic Composition of Endemics and Generalists By James M. Long Under the mentorship of Dr. John Schenk ABSTRACT Sandhill habitats are characterized by sandy, xeric soils that contain a unique assemblage of plants and animals. Similar to the broader long-leaf pine (Pinus palustris) and wire grass (Aristida stricta) ecosystem that sandhills are a subset of, agriculture, development, and habitat modifications have caused sandhill ecosystems to become degraded, putting many species at risk of extinction. Previous studies have focused on diversity within individual sandhills, leaving us with an incomplete understanding of how these communities form, what species are endemic, whether endemics are widespread across sandhills, and how species have adapted to these communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Composition of the South-Central Florida Dry Prairie Landscape Steve L
    Floristic Composition of the South-Central Florida Dry Prairie Landscape Steve L. Orzell Avon Park Air Force Range, 29 South Blvd., Avon Park Air Force Range, FL 33825-5700 [email protected] Edwin L. Bridges Botanical and Ecological Consultant, 7752 Holly Tree Place NW, Bremerton, WA 98312-1063 [email protected] ABSTRACT Floristic composition of the Florida dry prairie landscape was compiled from 291 sites in nine south-central peninsular counties. Floristic lists were based upon field inventory and compilation from reliable sources to- taling 11,250 site and community type-specific observations and were analyzed by region (Kissimmee River, Desoto/Glades “Big Prairie,” and Myakka). The known vascular flora consists of 658 vascular plant taxa, rep- resenting 317 genera and 115 families. Families with the highest number of species are Poaceae (103), Asteraceae (78), Cyperaceae (76), Fabaceae (23), Scrophulariaceae (20), and Orchidaceae (18). The most diverse genera are Rhynchospora (29), Dichanthelium (17), Ludwigia (13), Xyris (12), and Andropogon (11). Of this flora 24 taxa are endemic to central or southern peninsular Florida, primarily within the pine savanna- flatwood/dry prairie landscape, and 41 taxa are of Floridian biotic affinity. Although most species are not re- gionally specific, a few (Carphephorus carnosus, Ctenium aromaticum, and Liatris spicata) appear to be ab- sent from the Myakka prairie region, while Marshallia tenuifolia appears to be absent from both the Desoto/ Glades and Myakka prairie regions. Within the dry prairie landscape Hypericum edisonianum is restricted to the Desoto/Glades region. A few other species somewhat differentiate between prairie regions; however, most occur in other habitats in the counties where they are absent or nearly absent from dry prairie.
    [Show full text]
  • 3L4 Meeting Date: January 13, 2015 [X] [ ]
    AGENDA ITEM IS OVER 100 PAGES AND CAN BE VIEWED IN MINUTES Agenda Item#: 3L4 PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 13,January 2015 [X] Consent [ ] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] PubHc Hearing Department Submitted By: Environmental Resources Management Submitted For: Environmental Resources Management I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: an initial management plan for the Lantana Scrub Natural Area. Summary: The initial management plan for the 34.1-acre Lantana Scrub Natural Area identifies the natural resources present on the site and provides for the preservation, restoration and ongoing management of those resources. The management plan also identifies recreational uses and amenities which may be accommodated on the site without adversely affecting the site's natural resources. The updatefirst to this management plan will be due in 2025. District 7 (SF) Background and Justification: The Lantana Scrub Natural Area is managed by the County's Department of Enviromnental Resources Management. The Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund holds title to 32.6 acres of the natural area which are managed in accordance with Amendment No. 1 to the Yamato Scrub management lease (lease no. 4176, R- 2012-1688). The lease is scheduled to expire on February 23, 2048. An additional 1.5 acres is managed by the County pursuant to an Interlocal Agreement (R-2014-0287) with the Florida Department of Health. The Palm Beach County Natural Areas Management Advisory Committee (NAMAC) reviews each natural area management plan prepared by county staff and makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve and Fort Caroline National Memorial, 2009
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve and Fort Caroline National Memorial, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/249 ON THE COVER Partridge berry or squawvine (Mitchella repens) Photograph by Sarah L. Corbett at Theodore Roosevelt Area of Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, June 2009. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve and Fort Caroline National Memorial, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/249 Michael W. Byrne and Sarah L. Corbett USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 and Joseph C. DeVivo USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network University of Georgia 160 Phoenix Road, Phillips Lab Athens, Georgia, 30605 February 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Balduina Angustifolia Coastalplain Honeycombhead
    SGEB-75-2 Balduina angustifolia coastalplain honeycombhead Asteraceae communities. Leaves are entire, simple, narrowly linear, up to 2 in long, and alternate. Inflorescences occur en masse during the summer. Inflorescences are branched corymbs when not solitary. Heads contain ray flowers up to 0.8 in long with yellow rays and disk flowers up to 4 to 5 mm long, also yellow. When dry, mature heads are viewed from above, chambers in the head take on the appearance of cells in a honeycomb. Chambers appear white and contain easily identifiable fruits. Fruits are achenes typically no longer than 2 millimeters. Seeds are black with an attached whitish grey 2-mm-long pappus with round scales. Propagation Cutting propagation of coastalplain honeycombhead is possible with an application of 5,000 ppm IBA (Indole-3-bu- tyric acid) recommended for optimal rooting response. Apical stem cuttings taken during June to July should Credit: Gabriel Campbell, UF/IFAS achieve at least 80% rooting and produce about 15 roots per cutting (Wilson et al. 2010). Coastalplain honeycombhead is found in beach dunes, coastal grasslands, and scrub throughout Florida and into Alabama and Mississippi. It is a prolific flower and seed producer that attracts numerous pollinators, including the gulf fritillary butterfly. Interestingly, the endemic, solitary, and ground-dwelling coastal plain Hesperapis (Hesperapis oraria), also known as Balduina bee, is completely depen- dent on the coastalplain honeycombhead for survival, only emerging from the ground a few weeks each year in Sep- tember to October to collect pollen and nectar (Hunsburger 2013). This bee only occurs on barrier islands and peninsu- las in the northern Gulf of Mexico (Hunsburger 2013) and is particularly vulnerable to climate-change-driven sea-level rise and habitat fragmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Adventures in Georgia's Coastal Counties
    Botanical Adventures in Georgia's Coastal Counties In six counties, 180 plant families with ~1800 plant species More than 35% of Georgia’s flora Photos (mostly) by Hugh & Carol Nourse, James Holland, Richard & Teresa Ware, Bobby Hattaway, Eleanor Dietrich, Alan Cressler, Will Cook, and Dan Tenaglia THANK YOU! Sandhills: ancient sand dunes with deep, excessively drained sandy soils and fire-maintained vegetation Floodplains and freshwater tidal swamps Barrier Island Dunes and Salt Marshes Blackbeard Island The Big Four Coastal Grasses Flowering Plant Mints Families Beans Composites Composite family – Asteraceae: the largest plant family in the world rosinweed thistle sunflower goldenrod ironweed What makes a Composite a composite? Many flowers are grouped into heads, typically with: • a central disk with many tiny flowers, disk flowers • surrounded by a whorl of showy ray flowers, • supported by whorls of green bracts. ray flowers ray flowers disk flowers “in- voe-loo-ker” involucre – composed of involucral bracts, also called phyllaries It’s Botany…. of course, there are exceptions! Sometimes either the ray flowers or the disk flowers are missing Typically, Disk flowers present. Ray flowers present. both ray and disk Ray flowers missing. Disk flowers missing. flowers are present. Why is the composite family so successful? More than 23,000 species, found on every continent except Antarctica. Very efficient pollination strategy: Many flowers (100s!) packed into a small head means that a pollinator can Phaon Crescent on Black-eyed Susan visit many flowers in a short time with the least amount of energy expenditure. Lots of cross-pollination = many fertile seeds = reproductive success. Gulf Fritillary on Ironweed Coastal Honeycomb-head Balduina angustifolia Sand dunes and sandhills Stems up to 3 feet tall, reddish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity and Floral Hosts of Bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 The diversity and floral hosts of bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Mark Deyrup Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, FL Jayanthi Edirisinghe Department of Zoology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Beth Norden National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Deyrup, Mark; Edirisinghe, Jayanthi; and Norden, Beth, "The diversity and floral hosts of bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 544. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/544 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI. Vol. 16. No. 1-3. March-Se~tember.2002 8 7 The diversity and floral hosts of bees at the Archbold Biological Station, Florida (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Mark Deyrup Archbold Biological Station P.O. Box 2057 Lake Placid, FL 33862 Jayanthi Edirisinghe Department of Zoology, University of Peradeniya Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Beth Norden Department of Systematic Biology Entomology Section, MRC - 188 National Museum of Natural History Washington, D.C. 20560 Abstract. A list is provided of 113 species of bees and their 157 known floral hosts at the Archbold Biological Station(ABS), a 2105 ha site on the Lake Wales Ridge in Highlands County in south-central Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Florida's Pollinators
    1st Grade Natural Resources Course The Importance of Florida’s Pollinators Created by: Florida Native Plant Society To the Educator: It is no secret that much of Florida’s unique natural habitats have been altered through human actions. Whether it is for housing development, agriculture, or recreational use, humans have disrupted natural ecosystems before recognizing the value and benefits they provided as a whole to the entire ecosystem of Florida. Even though many acres have now been set aside for preservation, the damage already done has resulted in fragmentation of habitat that places the lives of many species of plants and animals in jeopardy. These preserved fragments often lie within close proximity to human habitation. This alone makes habitat management within the preserve a challenge as problems arise from the encroachment of landscape plants that are often exotic and invasive, domestic pets running free, and a fear of wildfire and ignorance of its benefits to several of these environments that depend upon it for health and regeneration. It is vital to educate our future generations on the needs of these habitats that we desperately should protect. Encouragement to be good land stewards should begin early. The belief that future land use should be environmentally thoughtful in the planning stages must be instilled in our young people so that past mistakes are not repeated. The purpose of this course is to feature the important roles that pollinators play in both human wellbeing and the natural environment that we all depend on for our survival. There are many types of pollinators and most are found in abundance in Florida’s well managed natural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Riverfront Pines Natural Area Public Use Facilities
    Agenda Item :3L2 PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: September 22, 2015 [X] Consent [ ] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing Department Submitted By: Environmental Resources Management Submitted For: Environmental Resources Management I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: an initial management plan for the Jackson Riverfront Pines Natural Area. Summary: The management plan (Plan) identifies natural resources present on the site and provides for the preservation, restoration, management and recreational uses of those resources. The first update to the Plan will be due in 2025. District 1 (SF) Background and Justification: After review of the Plan by the Natural Areas Management Advisory Committee (NAMAC) and a public hearing held on July 16, 2015, NAMAC unanimously recommended the Plan for approval at its August 21, 2015 meeting. Initial invasive/nonnative vegetation removal, fence and regulatory sign installation, house/pool/dock demolition and trash pickup activities have been completed. Construction/installation of the remaining capitcil improvements (public use facilities and signage) is expected to cost $175,525. Annual management and operation costs, including biological monitoring, prescribed burns/mechanical vegetation reduction, ongoing nonnative/invasive animal and plant control, and repair and replacement of facilities, as needed, are estimated to be $38,843. Funds for the capital improvements, and annual management and operation of the site are expected to come from the Natural Areas Fund, Natural Areas Stewardship Endowment Fund, Pollution Recovery Trust Fund, and/or Ag Reserve Land Management Fund. Staff also will pursue grant funding to offset a portion of land management costs. Attachments: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.11 Interior
    REFEREED RESEARCH Performance of nine Florida native wildflower species grown in varying container substrates Adrienne M Smith, Sandra B Wilson, Mack Thetford, Keona L Nolan, and Carrie Reinhardt Adams Godfrey’s goldenaster. Photo by Natalie Hooton wk landscape evaluation. Survival, performance, and flower ABSTRACT duration varied by treatment and species. Smith AM, Wilson SB, Thetford M, Nolan KL, Adams CR. 2014. Per - Rising costs of container substrates and increased interest in formance of nine Florida native wildflower species grown in varying use of native wildflowers for landscapes necessitates the con - container substrates. Native Plants Journal 15(1):75 –86. tinued evaluation of production methods. The composition of a container substrate can directly affect not only propagation KEY WORDS success but also future growth, development, and establish - trial gardens, Balduina angustifolia , Callisia ornata , Chrysoma ment. Thus, a number of container substrates have been for - pauciflosculosa , Chrysopsis godfreyi , Dalea feayi , Licania mich - mulated and marketed for improved drainage, root distribu - auxii , Polygonella macrophylla , Polygonella polygama , Polygon - tion, and plant growth. We evaluated performance of 9 ella robusta wildflower species native to Florida in 4 commercially available substrates. Within each substrate treatment, plants were eval - NOMENCLATURE uated in the greenhouse for 20 wk prior to an additional 40- USDA NRCS (2013a) 75 NATIVE PLANTS | 15 | 1 | SPRING 2014 n increasing number of Florida consumers are adopt- sition can affect plant quality when grown in container sub - ing landscaping principles that include an array of strates with properties different from that of the natural soils A native plants that are low maintenance, ornamen - to which the plants are accustomed (Hammond and others tally attractive, and environmentally functional (Wilson and 2004; Wilson and Stoffella 2006; Wilson and others 2006; Lan - others 2006; Kabat and others 2007).
    [Show full text]