DOCSLIB.ORG

Identifying Building Sites in Summit County, Colorado: Geography, Geology, and Gis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identifying Building Sites in Summit County, Colorado: Geography, Geology, and Gis IDENTIFYING BUILDING SITES IN SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO: GEOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND GIS A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment for The Degree Masters of Science in The Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kelly Ann Barrett ******* The Ohio State University 2009 Master’s Examination Committee: Dr. Douglas E. Pride, Adviser Approved by Dr. Franklin Schwartz ___________________________ Adviser Dr. E. Scott Bair Geological Science Graduate Program i ii ABSTRACT A Geographic Information System (GIS) was developed to identify future home and business sites in Summit County, Colorado, one of the fastest growing regions in the country. The permanent population is projected to be 31,500 by 2010, an increase of 25 percent from 2000 (Colorado Department of Local Affairs Demography Section). Also, in the winter the population of the county may increase to 150,000 or more during peak ski weekends (Summit County Planning Department, 2003). The county will continue development to accommodate the growing population and tourists that flock to ski resorts and other vacation facilities in this very popular and accessible region. The GIS developed here includes data for: land ownership, topography (slope and aspect), bedrock and surficial geology, soil types, presence and orientation of bedrock lineaments, locations of water wells, culture (cities, roads, emergency facilities, etc.), and city and county zoning regulations. By incorporating and correlating features of all of these, it was possible to identify areas within Summit County that can accommodate increases in permanent population and the surges that characterize the tourist industry in Colorado. Because of its location in the high country of Colorado, about 80 percent of the county (496 sq mi of a total 620 sq mi) is administered by the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. However, the GIS developed here identified almost ii 13 percent of the county that is suitable for development – a number that could change subject to the ruling of the county or town planning commission. Twelve areas that range in size from 1.6 to 3.5 sq mi (4 to 9 sq km) were highlighted initially, and three of these were selected for follow-up evaluation: two near the town of Breckenridge (3.3 and 3.5 sq mi), and one near the town of Frisco (3.1 sq mi). The techniques developed in the GIS are directly applicable to the remaining nine of the twelve areas, and anywhere in the world where data and requirements are similar. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It would not have been possible to complete this study without the support of my family, friends, and professors. I thank Dr. Pride for the support, guidance, and ideas that he contributed this study. His enthusiasm aided in making this thesis possible. I wish to thank my committee members, Dr. Frank Schwartz and Dr. E. Scott Bair, for their help throughout this process. I also want to thank Dr. Berry Lyons for his initial guidance in this process. I thank the colleagues that gave me advice at the Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water concerning GIS. Wayne Jones, Paul Spahr, and Mike Angle provided suggestions and fixes throughout the study. The State of Ohio Union Education Trust has provided my tuition for the final year of my master’s reach, which has allowed me to finish this study while working fulltime. The Friends of Orton provided the ability to purchase the U.S. Geological Survey digital orthographic quarter quadrangles and Colorado Water Resources water well data used in this study. Finally, I thank my parents, my brothers, and my friends for their encouragement to finish this study. iv VITA December, 1981……………………………. Born – Salem, OH 2000 – 2004…………………………………B.S. Geology Denison University, Granville, OH 2004 – 2007…………………………………Student Intern Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water 2007 – Present……………………………….Geologist Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Mineral Resources Management v PUBLICATIONS 1. Spahr, P.N., Jones, W., Barrett, K.A., Angle, M.P., and Raab, J.M., 2007. Using GIS to Create and Analyze Potentiometric-Surface Maps. Soller, D.R., ed., Digital Mapping Techniques ’06 – Workshop Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, June 11-14, 2006: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1285, 217p. (Also available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1285/.) 2. Wayne, J. and Barrett, K., 2007. Building a Water Well Database for GIS analysis. Soller, D.R., ed., Digital Mapping Techniques ’06 – Workshop Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, June 11-14, 2006: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007- 1285, 217p. (Also available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1285/.) 3. Wayne, J., Barrett, K., M. Angle, and J. Raab, 2007. The Relationship between Land Use, Ground Water Flow and Non-Point Source Contamination in the Upper Mad River Watershed. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water, Water Resources Section. 117p. FIELDS OF STUDY Major fields: Geological science vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iv Vita ...................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x List of Figures ................................................................................................................... xii Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Importance of Study ......................................................................... 1 1.2 Location ................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Demographics ....................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Climate .................................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Physical Geography .............................................................................................. 9 1.6 Geologic Setting .................................................................................................. 10 1.7 Hydrology ........................................................................................................... 11 1.8 Water Supply and Water Quality Concerns and Previous Work ........................ 15 Part 1 of Analysis .............................................................................................................. 18 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Description of Jason Miller’s Work .................................................................... 18 2.3 Methods Used in This Study ............................................................................... 26 2.4 Slope and Aspect ................................................................................................. 27 vii 2.5 Land Ownership and Zoning .............................................................................. 40 2.6 Proximity............................................................................................................. 52 2.7 Map Algebra: Adding Data ................................................................................ 63 2.8 Results: Final Addition Product ......................................................................... 67 2.9 Possible Variations to the Final Addition Product .............................................. 69 2.10 Selecting Areas for Detailed Study ................................................................... 70 2.11 Results ............................................................................................................... 91 2.12 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 93 Part 2 of Analysis .............................................................................................................. 95 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 95 3.2 Data Collection ................................................................................................... 95 3.3 Data Preparation for Analysis ........................................................................... 101 3.4 Results and Analysis ......................................................................................... 107 3.4.1 Geology ...................................................................................................... 107 3.4.2 Lineaments ................................................................................................. 115 3.4.3 Soil ............................................................................................................. 127 3.4.4 Water Well Data ........................................................................................ 135 3.5 Data Comparisons: Part Two Data .................................................................. 141 3.5.1 Lineaments and Geology ..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Group Living Frequently Asked Questions
    Group Living Project – Common Questions General questions about the project: Page 1 Household Regulations: Page 3 Residential Care: Page 6 Advisory Committee: Page 9 Next Steps: Page 10 What is this project about and how long has it been going on? For the last two and a half years, Denver city planners have been working with residents, policy experts, advocates and service providers for vulnerable populations and other community members to update the Denver Zoning Code’s regulations on residential uses. These regulations govern everything from conventional households to group homes, shelters and assisted living facilities. Why do residential use rules need to be updated? Current rules create obstacles for residents who need flexible housing options and for providers who offer much-needed services to vulnerable populations. Current rules also perpetuate inequity by making it harder for certain communities to live in residential neighborhoods and near jobs, transit or other services they need. The project and the proposed changes aim to increase flexibility and housing options for residents, to streamline permitting processes for providers while fostering good relationships with neighbors, and to make it easier for those experiencing homelessness, trying to get sober or who have other special needs to live and access services with dignity. Why can’t we move more slowly with these changes? This project has been in progress for more than two years. The issues addressed have become even more urgent in the wake of the ongoing pandemic, job losses that are leading to a wave of evictions, the forthcoming loss of Denver’s existing community corrections resources, and our country’s long-overdue awakening to issues of equity.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1. Species: Mountain Plover (Charadrius Montanus) 2. Status
    1. Species: Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus) 2. Status: Table 1 summarizes the current status of this species or subspecies by various ranking entity and defines the meaning of the status. Table 1. Current status of Charadrius montanus Entity Status Status Definition NatureServe G3 Species is Vulnerable At moderate risk of extinction or elimination due to a fairly restricted range, relatively few populations or occurrences, recent and widespread declines, threats, or other factors. CNHP S2B Species is Imperiled At high risk of extinction or elimination due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. (B=Breeding) Colorado SGCN, Tier 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need State List Status USDA Forest R2 Sensitive Region 2 Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species Service USDI FWSb BoCC Included in the USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern list a Colorado Natural Heritage Program. b US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. The 2012 U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule defines Species of Conservation Concern (SCC) as “a species, other than federally recognized threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate species, that is known to occur in the plan area and for which the regional forester has determined that the best available scientific information indicates substantial concern about the species' capability to persist over the long-term in the plan area” (36 CFR 219.9). This overview was developed to summarize information relating to this species’ consideration to be listed as a SCC on the Rio Grande National Forest, and to aid in the development of plan components and monitoring objectives. 3. Taxonomy Genus/species Charadrius montanus is accepted as valid (ITIS 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • PEAK to PRAIRIE: BOTANICAL LANDSCAPES of the PIKES PEAK REGION Tass Kelso Dept of Biology Colorado College 2012
    !"#$%&'%!(#)()"*%+'&#,)-#.%.#,/0-#!"0%'1%&2"%!)$"0% !"#$%("3)',% &455%$6758% /69:%8;%+<878=>% -878?4@8%-8776=6% ABCA% Kelso-Peak to Prairie Biodiversity and Place: Landscape’s Coat of Many Colors Mountain peaks often capture our imaginations, spark our instincts to explore and conquer, or heighten our artistic senses. Mt. Olympus, mythological home of the Greek gods, Yosemite’s Half Dome, the ever-classic Matterhorn, Alaska’s Denali, and Colorado’s Pikes Peak all share the quality of compelling attraction that a charismatic alpine profile evokes. At the base of our peak along the confluence of two small, nondescript streams, Native Americans gathered thousands of years ago. Explorers, immigrants, city-visionaries and fortune-seekers arrived successively, all shaping in turn the region and communities that today spread from the flanks of Pikes Peak. From any vantage point along the Interstate 25 corridor, the Colorado plains, or the Arkansas River Valley escarpments, Pikes Peak looms as the dominant feature of a diverse “bioregion”, a geographical area with a distinct flora and fauna, that stretches from alpine tundra to desert grasslands. “Biodiversity” is shorthand for biological diversity: a term covering a broad array of contexts from the genetics of individual organisms to ecosystem interactions. The news tells us daily of ongoing threats from the loss of biodiversity on global and regional levels as humans extend their influence across the face of the earth and into its sustaining processes. On a regional level, biologists look for measures of biodiversity, celebrate when they find sites where those measures are high and mourn when they diminish; conservation organizations and in some cases, legal statutes, try to protect biodiversity, and communities often struggle to balance human needs for social infrastructure with desirable elements of the natural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology Database for Central Colorado
    Geochronology Database for Central Colorado Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochronology Database for Central Colorado By T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt, 2009, Geochronology database for central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 489, 13 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial to W.A. “Bill” Cobban (1916–2015) NEAL L
    Memorial to W.A. “Bill” Cobban (1916–2015) NEAL L. LARSON Larson Paleontology Unlimited, LLC, Keystone, South Dakota 57745, USA; [email protected] NEIL H. LANDMAN American Museum of Natural History, Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates), New York, New York 10024, USA; [email protected] STEPHEN C. HOOK Atarque Geologic Consulting, LLC, Socorro, New Mexico 87810, USA; [email protected] Dr. W.A. “Bill” Cobban, one of the most highly re- spected, honored and published geologist-paleontologists of all time, passed away peacefully in his sleep in the morning of 21 April 2015 at the age of 98 in Lakewood, Colorado. Bill was an extraordinary field collector, geologist, stratigrapher, biostratigrapher, paleontologist, and mapmaker who spent nearly his entire life working for the U.S. Geo- logical Survey (USGS). In a career that spanned almost 75 years, he fundamentally changed our understanding of the Upper Cretaceous Western Interior through its fossils, making it known throughout the world. William Aubrey “Bill” Cobban was born in 1916 near Great Falls, Montana. As a teenager, he discovered a dinosaur in the Kootenai Formation catching the attention of Barnum Brown, premier dinosaur collector at the American Museum of Natural History, where the dinosaur now resides. A few years later, as Bill told, he read about the discovery of fossil bones in Shelby, Montana, during excavation of the Toole County Courthouse. The bones turned out to actually be baculites and other iridescent ammonites. These ammonites made such an impression on Bill they would change his life forever. He attended Montana State University in 1936, where he met a geology professor who encouraged an already developing love for geology and paleontology and received his B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado
    Bibliography and Index of Geology and Hydrology, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado By FELICIE CHRONIC and JOHN CHRONIC GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1306 Bibliographic citations for more than 1,800 indexed reports, theses, and open-file releases concerning one of the Nation's most rapidly growing areas UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600045 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402- Price $1.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02545 PREFACE This bibliography is intended for persons wishing geological information about the Front Range Urban Corridor. It was compiled at the University of Colorado, funded by the U.S. Geological Survey, and is based primarily on references in the Petroleum Research Microfilm Library of the Rocky Mountain Region. Extensive use was made also of U.S. Geological Survey and American Geological Institute bibliographies, as well as those of the Colorado Geological Survey. Most of the material listed was published or completed before July 1, 1972; references to some later articles, as well as to a few which were not found in the first search, are appended at the end of the alphabetical listing. This bibliography may include more references than some users feel are warranted, but the authors felt that the greatest value to the user would result from a comprehensive rather than a selective listing. Hence, we decided to include the most significant synthesizing articles and books in order to give a broad picture of the geology of the Front Range Urban Corridor, and to include also some articles which deal with geology of areas adjacent to, and probably pertinent to, the corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Properties for Sale Colorado
    Church Properties For Sale Colorado recogniseNeville remains his peevishness. pleasurable Conciliarafter Morley Brandy centrifugalize disfeatures parcel easily or while tweezes Corky any always Oldham. hams Hush-hush his mousses and brush-uptinsel Kennedy incognita, interlard he tetanised so smilingly so opposite. that Vernen RMCLT utilizes a scattered site challenge to homeownership our homes and families are scattered throughout the better of Colorado Springs and El Paso County. Please select areas that were an affordable homeownership; or colorado square retail center is located in short on the school year and councilman ed vela have. Together we carry A to Z commercial real estate development services to User. Sale Lease Properties NAI Shames Makovsky. Beyond Just Homes with Pamela Church Real Estate in. The sale to fix them includes large retail centers properties for sale whose setting. Church Properties Duhs Commercial. Text or scheduled conference room, no end and east facing with rewards and gift ideas about school activities for rent a pin leading commercial properties for sale offering such. Beautiful gown in Walsenburg CO This judge a religious facility built in 1929. Colorado Retail Properties For Sale Cityfeet. Durango Commercial Real Estate For Sale Durango CO. Commercial Real Estate for Sale & Rent Colorado Springs. Properties For excellent in Colorado Historic Homes United. See 15 Colorado Churches Religious Facilities for country Access photos 3D tours and accident on the 1 commercial real estate site. Littleton CO 0123 UNDER one Sale Price 1350000 16512 psf CAP Rate 734 Building Size 176 sf Lot Size 3177 SF 73 acres. The content relating to real estate for sale under this Web site comes in fee from the.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Story of Colorado's Sangre De Cristo Range
    The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover shows a landscape carved by glaciers. Front cover, Crestone Peak on left and the three summits of Kit Carson Mountain on right. Back cover, Humboldt Peak on left and Crestone Needle on right. Photograph by the author looking south from Mt. Adams. The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range By David A. Lindsey A description of the rocks and landscapes of the Sangre de Cristo Range and the forces that formed them. Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lindsey, D.A., 2010, The geologic story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1349, 14 p. iii Contents The Oldest Rocks ...........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic Age Determinations, Unaltered and Hydrothermally Altered Igneous Rocks, North-Central Colorado Mineral Belt A.A
    Isotopic age determinations, unaltered and hydrothermally altered igneous rocks, north-central Colorado mineral belt A.A. Bookstrom, C.W. Naeser, and J.R. Shannon Isochron/West, Bulletin of Isotopic Geochronology, v. 49, pp. 13-20 Downloaded from: https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/periodicals/isochronwest/home.cfml?Issue=49 Isochron/West was published at irregular intervals from 1971 to 1996. The journal was patterned after the journal Radiocarbon and covered isotopic age-dating (except carbon-14) on rocks and minerals from the Western Hemisphere. Initially, the geographic scope of papers was restricted to the western half of the United States, but was later expanded. The journal was sponsored and staffed by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines (now Geology) & Mineral Resources and the Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology. All back-issue papers are available for free: https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/periodicals/isochronwest This page is intentionally left blank to maintain order of facing pages. 13 ISOTOPIC AGE DETERMINATIONS, UNALTERED AND HYDROTHERMALLY ALTERED IGNEOUS ROCKS, NORTH-CENTRAL COLORADO MINERAL BELT ARTHUR A. BOOKSTROM 1805 Glen Ayr Dr., Lakewood, CO 80215 CHARLES W. NAESER U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 JAMES R. SHANNON Department of Geology, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401 Monzonite and granodiorite intrusions of the Empire Fission-track age determinations were done in the fission- district are early Tertiary (65 Ma) in age, as dated by track laboratory of the U.S. Geological Survey in Denver, Simmons and Hedge (1978). Monzonite and granodiorite and at the University of Utah Research Institute. People intrusions of the Alma district have yielded isotopic ages who cooperated in this study include Mark Coolbaugh, ranging from 71 to 41 Ma (Bookstrom, in press).
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous and Tertiary Formations Op the Wasatch Plateau, Utah * by Edmund M
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 36. PP. 439*454 SEPTEMBER 30. 1925 CRETACEOUS AND TERTIARY FORMATIONS OP THE WASATCH PLATEAU, UTAH * BY EDMUND M. SPIEKER AND JOHN B. REESIDE, JR. {Read before the Geological Society December SO, 1925) CONTENTS Page Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 435 General features of plateau........................................................................................... 436 Location and surface features............................................................................. 436 Structure.......................................................................................................................436 Mancos shale........................................................................................................................ 436 General statement...................................................................................................... 436 Lower shale member................................................................................................. 437 Ferron sandstone member...................................................................................... 438 Middle shale member............................................................................................... 438 Emery sandstone member...................................................................................... 439 Upper shale member...........................................................................'....................439
    [Show full text]