DOCSLIB.ORG

Ten Mile Planning Commission Meeting Packet 6.13.19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ten Mile Planning Commission Meeting Packet 6.13.19 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 970.668.4200 0037 Peak One Dr. | PO Box 5660 www.SummitCountyCO.gov Frisco, CO 80443 TEN MILE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA June 13, 2019 - 5:30 p.m. Buffalo Mountain Meeting Room, County Commons 0037 Peak One Dr., SCR 1005, Frisco, CO Commission Dinner: 5:00pm I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF SUMMARY OF MOTIONS: May 9, 2019 IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Additions, Deletions, Change of Order V. CONSENT AGENDA: None VI. WORK SESSION: None VII. PUBLIC HEARING: PLN18-078 – Copper Mountain Major PUD Amendment (A-Lift Neighborhood) 1. Land Use: a. Increase the in Equivalent Units (EU) on Parcel 32, A-Lift, from 30 to 72; b. Increase the commercial square footage on Parcel 32, A-Lift, from 1,000 to 11,000; c. Decrease the EUs on Parcel 18, Chapel Lot, from 239 to 194; d. Decrease the commercial square footage on Parcel 18, Chapel Lot, from 28,149 to 19,849; e. Removal of Parcels 33, Triple Treat East, and Parcel 34, Stables, and transfer of 1,700 square feet of commercial density to Parcel 32, A-Lift; f. A new definition for “Event Plaza” to be located on Open Space Parcel X (OS-X); and g. Land use table revisions to accomplish the foregoing as well as other outstanding previously approved revisions. 2. Housing: Clarification to the priority leasing and sales process. 3. Open Space: a. Addition of Open Space Parcel CC (OS-CC) and establishment of permitted uses; b. Addition of Trails T21, T22, T23 and T24; and c. Revisions to private open space golf course alignment within Open Space Parcel X (OS-X). 4. Building and Site Design: a. Addition of Design Standards for Parcel 32, A-Lift, including specific parameters for site development, road design, architecture and landscape; b. Increase in building height for Parcel 32, A-Lift, up to 65' for hotel and multi-family structures and 35' for single-family and townhome units; and c. Reduction of setbacks from local access roads from 20’ to 10’. 5. Roads and Parking: a. Addition of standards for A-Lift Transit Road “shuttle road”; and b. Modification to Road Maintenance Agreement language. 6. Development Triggers: Addition of development triggers for Parcel 32, A-Lift, including: one employee housing unit in the multi-family structure, development of parking and snow storage in Parcel 31, Maintenance Lot, wetland mitigation, trail construction, golf course construction, public restroom building at the Alpine Lift, restoration of historic cabin and West Tenmile Creek Reach 2 restoration. 7. Other amendments to accomplish the foregoing. VIII. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Suggested Revisions for Consideration in Next Master Plan Update Countywide Planning Commission issues Follow-up of previous BOCC meeting Planning Commission Issues IX. ADJOURNMENT * Allowance for Certain Site Plans to Be Placed on the Consent Agenda: Site plan reviews consisting of three (3) to a maximum of 12 multi-family units for the total development parcel or project may be placed on a Planning Commission’s “consent agenda”, which allows for expeditious review and approval of these smaller projects. Site plans may only be placed on the consent agenda if the recommendation does not include any conditions. Single-family and duplex development that are required to have a site plan review by a Planning Commission due to a plat note, PUD requirement or other regulatory mechanism may also be placed on a Commission’s consent agenda. A Planning Commission member may pull such agenda item off the consent agenda to allow staff or the applicant to address issues or questions related to the site plan review criteria for decision prior to taking action. TEN MILE PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY OF MOTIONS May 9, 2019 REGULAR MEETING Commission Members Present: Lesmes, Connolly, Franken, Beerntsen, Wahl, Sheely, Gongloff, Commission Members Absent: Withrow, Connolly Staff Present: Don Reimer, Planning Direction; Jessica Potter, Planner II; Keely Ambrose, Assistant County Attorney Meeting Commencement: Commissioner Franken, Chair, called the meeting of the Ten Mile Planning Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. Approval of Summary of Motions: The Summary of Motions from the April 11, 2019 meeting was approved as submitted. CONSENT AGENDA: None WORK SESSION: None NOTE: Chair Franken excused himself from the meeting at 6:15 to attend a prior engagement. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PLN19-016 Copper Employee and Affordable Housing Site Plan Review for 44 units of Employee / Affordable Housing in the northern portion of the Alpine Parking Lot; an approximately 2.5 acre site, Lot 2B, Copper Mountain East Neighborhood Subdivision; Parcel 30 of the Copper Mountain PUD. Commissioner Sheely made a motion to approve the application with the following findings and added conditions below: 1. The proposal is in conformance with zoning regulations including the provisions in the Copper Mountain PUD and the applicable sections of the Summit County Land Use and Development Code including but not limited to use, density, height, architectural design standards, and PUD triggers. 2. The proposal is in conformance with all Road and Bridge standards including access. 3. The proposal is in compliance with subdivision regulations including but not limited to drainage, fire protection, and the provision of utilities. 4. The proposal is in conformance with all previous plans and approvals on the site, the completion of the housing will satisfy the requirement in the PUD for Employee and Affordable Housing. Conditions: 1. A financial guarantee for the landscaping will be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 2. A covenant restricting the Employee and Affordable Housing units shall be finalized prior to issuance of Building Permit and recorded on the property prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Commissioner Gongloff seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 5 - 0. Commissioner Franken was not in attendance during the vote. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Don Reimer updated the Commission on the Short Term Rental permitting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jessica Potter, Planner II PLANNING DEPARTMENT 970.668.4200 0037 Peak One Dr. PO Box 5660 www.SummitCountyCO.gov Frisco, CO 80443 STAFF REPORT TO: Ten Mile Planning Commission FROM: Jessica Potter, Planner II FOR: Meeting of June 13, 2019 SUBJECT: PLN18-078, Major Amendment to the Copper Mountain PUD – A-Lift Neighborhood APPLICANT: Copper Mountain Resort (Graeme Bilenduke) & Continuum Partners (Mike Anderson) OWNER: Powdr – Copper Participation LLC REQUEST: Major PUD Amendment to the Copper Mountain Resort PUD to accomplish the following: 1. Land Use: a. Increase the in Equivalent Units (EU) on Parcel 32, A-Lift, from 30 to 72. b. Increase the commercial square footage on Parcel 32, A-Lift, from 1,000 to 11,000. c. Decrease the EUs on Parcel 18, Chapel Lot, from 239 to 194. d. Decrease the commercial square footage on Parcel 18, Chapel Lot, from 28,149 to 19,849. e. Removal of Parcels 33, Triple Treat East, and Parcel 34, Stables and transfer of 1,700 square feet of commercial density to Parcel 32, A-Lift. f. A new definition for “Event Plaza” to be located on Open Space Parcel X (OS-X). g. Land use table revisions to accomplish the foregoing as well as other outstanding previously approved revisions. 2. Housing a. Clarification to the priority leasing and sales process. 3. Open Space a. Addition of Open Space Parcel CC (OS-CC) and establishment of permitted uses. b. Addition of Trails T21, T22, T23 and T24. c. Revisions to private open space golf course alignment within Open Space Parcel X (OS-X). 4. Building and Site Design a. Addition of Design Standards for Parcel 32, A-Lift, including specific parameters for site development, road design, architecture and landscape. b. Increase in building height for Parcel 32, A-Lift, up to 65' for hotel and multi-family structures and 35' for single-family and townhome units. c. Reduction of setbacks from local access roads from 20’ to 10’. 5. Roads and Parking a. Addition of standards for A-Lift Transit Road “shuttle road”. b. Modification to Road Maintenance Agreement language. 6. Development Triggers a. Addition of development triggers for Parcel 32, A-Lift, including: one employee housing unit in the multi-family structure, development of parking and snow storage in Parcel 31, Maintenance Lot, wetland mitigation, trail construction, golf course construction, public restroom building at the Alpine Lift, restoration of historic cabin and West Tenmile Creek Reach 2 restoration. 7. Other amendments to accomplish the foregoing. PLN18-078: Maj. PUD – A-Lift 1 TMPC: 6-13-19 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location: A-Lift Neighborhood Legal Description: A portion of Lot 2B, Copper Mountain East Neighborhood Subdivision Existing Zoning: Copper Mountain Resort PUD, Parcel 32 and Parcel OS-X Proposed Use: Single-family residential, multi-family residential, hotel, employee housing, commercial Density Transfer: Residential: 42 Equivalent Units (EUs) from Parcel 18 (Chapel Lot) for a total of 72 EUs on Parcel 32 (A-Lift) Commercial: 1,500 sq. ft. from Parcel 34 (Stables), 200 sq. ft. from Parcel 34 (Triple Treat East), and 8,300 sq. ft. from Parcel 18 (Chapel Lot) for a total of 11,000 sq. ft. of Commercial (This is an increase of 43 EUs and 10,000 sq. ft. of Commercial.) Total site area: Approximately 7.7 acres Adjacent land uses: East: Highway 91 West: White River National Forest (Ski Resort Operations) North: Maintenance and Storage Area, Copper Mountain PUD (Parcel 31) South: Alpine Lift, Copper Mountain PUD (Parcel OS-X) Overview of Proposal: Powdr-Copper, the resort Owner, and Continuum Partners, the developer for this project, are requesting a Major Amendment to the Copper Mountain Planned Unit Development (PUD) to facilitate a new development at the base of the Alpine Lift.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December 13, 2017 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
    TOWN COUNCIL ACTION ITEM STAFF SUMMARY DECEMBER 19, 2017 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 13, 2017 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 9 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Consideration of a Resolution No. 75-17, Series of 2017: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF DILLON, COLORADO, FILE AN APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS AND MANIFESTING THE TOWN’S INTENT TO APPROPRIATE WATER FROM THE BLUE RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES BY EXCHANGE; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE APPROPRIATE TOWN OFFICERS TO SIGN THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS; AND, SETTING FORTH DETAILS IN RELATION THERETO. TIME FRAME: December 2017. SUMMARY: This resolution of support allows the Town to file one or more applications for new exchanges involving additional water in Clinton Reservoir and Dillon Reservoir acquired through the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement, and additional water decreed to Dillon for storage in Old Dillon Reservoir. This additional water was not previously included in exchange decrees and/or augmentation plans. This water includes: • Clinton Gulch Reservoir to the Dillon Ditch for storage in ODR and to Laskey Gulch and Straight Creek Diversions in the amount of 4.45 acre-feet; • Denver’s Dillon Reservoir to Dillon Ditch for storage in ODR and to Laskey Gulch and Straight Creek Diversions in the amount of 150 acre-feet; and • ODR (3rd Enlargement, 4th Enlargement, and Refill and any other water stored by exchange in ODR) to Blue River Intake and Laskey Gulch and Straight Creek Diversions in the amount of 24.215 acre-feet. New exchange decrees for this water allow greater flexibility for the Town to use all its water resources as needed and decreed.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Water-Quality Trends Using Sediment Cores from Dillon Reservoir, Summit County, Colorado
    NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Identification of Water-Quality Trends Using Sediment Cores from Dillon Reservoir, Summit County, Colorado Water-Resources Investigations Report 01–4022 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper cover photograph: Dillon Reservoir, August 1997. Lower left cover photograph: Pontoon boat used for the sediment-core sampling on Dillon Reservoir. Lower right cover photograph: Two sediment-core samples from Dillon Reservoir held in acrylic liners prior to processing. Identification of Water-Quality Trends Using Sediment Cores from Dillon Reservoir, Summit County, Colorado By Adrienne I. Greve, Norman E. Spahr, Peter C. Van Metre, and Jennifer T. Wilson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01–4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Denver, Colorado 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Box 25046, Mail Stop 415 Box 25286 Denver Federal Center Federal Center Denver, CO 80225–0046 Denver, CO 80225 FOREWORD The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is committed Each assessment is guided by a nationally consis- to serve the Nation with accurate and timely scientific tent study design and methods of sampling and analy- information that helps enhance and protect the overall sis. The assessments thereby build local knowledge quality of life, and facilitates effective management about water-quality issues and trends in a particular of water, biological, energy, and mineral resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Dillon Water Efficiency Plan 1
    Cover Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Where We Are Now ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Where We Want to Go ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 How We Will Get There ................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 How We Will Stay on Track ........................................................................................................... 2 2 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 4 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Why a water efficiency plan? ........................................................................................................ 6 3.2 The Planning Process .................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Our Water Vision ........................................................................................................................... 7 4 Service Area Characteristics .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Silverthorne Community Profile
    2015 Silverthorne Community Profile Prepared by: TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE Community Development Department March 2015 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION Setting 1 Description 1 Topography and Climate 2 History 3 CHAPTER 2 - DEMOGRAPHICS Population and Demographics 4 Education 5 Child Care and Preschool 5 Housing 6 CHAPTER 3 - ECONOMIC ACTIVITY Building 8 Business Licenses 8 Sales Tax, Retail Sales, and Other Taxes 9 CHAPTER 4 - TOWN GOVERNMENT Town Council and Planning Commission 10 Staff 10 Financial Plan 11 Budget 12 Utilities 13 CHAPTER 5 - EMPLOYMENT Major Employers 13 Workforce 14 Income 15 CHAPTER 6 - RECREATION AND PARKS Silverthorne Recreation Center 15 Town Parks 15 The Blue River and the Blue River Trail 16 Lake Dillon and Green Mountain Reservoir 16 Raven at Eagles Nest Golf Course 17 Hiking, Mountain Biking, and Skiing 17 APPENDIX A - COMMUNITY FACILITIES 18 Chapter 1 Introduction The Town of Silverthorne has experienced overwhelming change in the short time since its incorporation in 1967. Over the course of its existence, the Town has gone from a makeshift construction camp for workers building the Dillon Dam, to a convenient refueling stop along the Interstate, to a full-service, well- balanced community of an estimated 4,100 people. The purpose of the Town of Silverthorne Community Profile is to provide current and historical information on the physical, social, and economic factors that have shaped the evolution of the Town. Information of this nature is helpful, not only for the Town government, but also for those thinking of starting a business here, relocating to the area, or for residents curious about their Town.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue River Water Quality Management Plan 2012
    BLUE RIVER WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 WATERSHED OVERVIEW 1.1 Geography and Hydrology B - 3 1.2 Land Uses and Population Characteristics B - 4 1.3 Watershed Water Quality Management B - 5 2.0 WATERSHED WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT B - 6 2.1 Straight Creek B - 7 2.2 Snake River and Peru Creek B - 7 2.3 Upper Blue River and French Gulch B - 11 2.4 Tenmile Creek B - 14 2.5 Dillon Reservoir B - 18 2.6 Lower Blue River B - 20 2.7 Green Mountain Reservoir B - 24 2.8 Watershed Instream Flows B - 26 3.0 WATER QUALITY ISSUES B - 27 3.1 Point Source Issues B - 27 3.1.1 Municipal Discharges B - 27 3.1.2 Population Statistics and Projections B - 30 3.1.3 Industrial Discharges B - 31 3.1.4 Point Source Issues - Summary B - 31 3.2 Point Source Recommendations B - 32 3.3 Nonpoint Source Issues B - 33 3.3.1 Mining Impacts B - 33 3.3.2 Urban and Construction Activities B - 33 3.3.3 Hydrologic Modifications B - 35 3.3.3.1 Hydrologic Modifications Associated with Trans-basin Diversions B - 35 3.3.3.2 Hydrologic Modifications Associated with In-basin Diversions B - 36 3.3.4 Agricultural Activities B - 37 3.3.5 Recreational Activities B - 37 3.4 Nonpoint Source Recommendations B - 38 4.0 WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS B - 39 4.1 Existing Projects B - 39 4.1.1 Town of Frisco Stormwater Project B - 39 4.1.2 Town of Dillon Stormwater Project B - 39 4.1.3 Town of Breckenridge Blue River Restoration B - 39 4.1.4 Breckenridge Stormwater Quality Enhancement B - 40 4.1.5 Division of Minerals and Geology Peru Creek B - 40 4.1.6 Division
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Building Sites in Summit County, Colorado: Geography, Geology, and Gis
    IDENTIFYING BUILDING SITES IN SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO: GEOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY, AND GIS A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment for The Degree Masters of Science in The Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kelly Ann Barrett ******* The Ohio State University 2009 Master’s Examination Committee: Dr. Douglas E. Pride, Adviser Approved by Dr. Franklin Schwartz ___________________________ Adviser Dr. E. Scott Bair Geological Science Graduate Program i ii ABSTRACT A Geographic Information System (GIS) was developed to identify future home and business sites in Summit County, Colorado, one of the fastest growing regions in the country. The permanent population is projected to be 31,500 by 2010, an increase of 25 percent from 2000 (Colorado Department of Local Affairs Demography Section). Also, in the winter the population of the county may increase to 150,000 or more during peak ski weekends (Summit County Planning Department, 2003). The county will continue development to accommodate the growing population and tourists that flock to ski resorts and other vacation facilities in this very popular and accessible region. The GIS developed here includes data for: land ownership, topography (slope and aspect), bedrock and surficial geology, soil types, presence and orientation of bedrock lineaments, locations of water wells, culture (cities, roads, emergency facilities, etc.), and city and county zoning regulations. By incorporating and correlating features of all of these, it was possible to identify areas within Summit County that can accommodate increases in permanent population and the surges that characterize the tourist industry in Colorado. Because of its location in the high country of Colorado, about 80 percent of the county (496 sq mi of a total 620 sq mi) is administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Colorado Regulations 1 Discharge Allowed Phosphorus Discharge (Lb./Yr.) Major Municipal
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission REGULATION NO. 71 - DILLON RESERVOIR CONTROL REGULATION 5 CCR 1002-71 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ 71.0 DILLON RESERVOIR CONTROL REGULATION 71.1 AUTHORITY The Water Quality Control Commission is authorized by section 25-8-205, C.R.S., to promulgate control regulations to describe prohibitions, standards, concentrations, and effluent limitations on the extent of specifically identified pollutants that any person may discharge into any specified class of state waters. 71.2 DEFINITIONS See the Colorado Water Quality Control Act and other Water Quality Control Commission regulations for additional definitions. (1) "NONPOINT SOURCE" - any activity or facility other than a point source from which pollutants are or may be discharged. (2) "DISPERSAL SYSTEM" - a system for the disposal of effluent, after final treatment in an individual sewage disposal system, by a method which does not depend upon or utilize the treatment capability of the soil. (3) “RESERVE POOL” – consists of total phosphorus credits that have not been allocated to any discharger. The source of these credits may be previous phosphorus allocations for facilities no longer in operation, reductions in existing discharger phosphorus allocations listed in 71.3, nonpoint source control projects as described in 71.5, or other sources that do not result in an increase to the total phosphorus load to Dillon Reservoir. 71.3 WASTELOAD ALLOCATION FOR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DISCHARGE The dischargers listed below shall not discharge more than the indicated amounts of total phosphorus in any consecutive twelve month period except as provided in section 5 below.
    [Show full text]
  • Willow Creek Pumping Plant Lifts the Water 175 Feet. It Then Flows by Gravity Via the Willow Creek Feeder Canal Down to Lake Granby
    DESCRIPTION OF THE COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT The Colorado-Big Thompson Project (C-BT) is one of the largest and most complex natural resource developments undertaken by the Bureau of Reclamation. It consists of over 100 structures integrated into a trans-mountain water diversion system through which multiple benefits are provided. The C-BT spreads over approximately 250 miles in the State of Colorado. It stores, regulates, and diverts water from the Colorado River west of the Rocky Mountains, providing supplemental water for irrigation of 720,000 acres of land east of the Rocky Mountains. It also provides water for municipal use, industrial use, hydroelectric power, and water-oriented recreation. Major features of the C-BT include dams, dikes, reservoirs, powerplants, pumping plants, pipelines, tunnels, transmission lines, substations, and other associated structures (Table 1, Exhibits 1 and 2). Historically, the C-BT has diverted approximately 230,000 acre-feet of water annually (310,000 acre-feet maximum) from the Colorado River headwaters on the western slope to the South Platte River Basin on the eastern slope, for distribution to project lands and communities. The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District apportions the water used for irrigation to more than 120 ditches and 60 reservoirs. Twenty-nine communities receive municipal and industrial water from the C-BT. The Western Division of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program markets the electric power produced at the six powerplants. The western slope collection system captures runoff from the high mountains and stores, regulates, and conveys the water to Adams Tunnel for diversion to the east slope under the Continental Divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Cooperative Agreement
    COLORADO RIVER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into among the following listed Signatories, to become effective upon the first business day at least seven days after the last Signatory has signed this Agreement. The Effective Date of this Agreement is the 26th day of September, 2013. The Signatories acknowledge the mutual exchange of consideration in entering into this Agreement. City and County of Denver, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water) Board of County Commissioners, County of Eagle Board of County Commissioners, County of Grand Board of County Commissioners, County of Summit Colorado River Water Conservation District Middle Park Water Conservancy District Clinton Ditch and Reservoir Company Eagle Park Reservoir Company Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority Grand Valley Water Users Association Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Ute Water Conservancy District Palisade Irrigation District Mesa County Irrigation District Grand Valley Irrigation Company City of Glenwood Springs City of Rifle This Colorado River Cooperative Agreement consists of the 51-page agreement dated May 15, 2012 (pages 44, 45, 50, and 51 dated January 7, 2013); Attachments A through T, which have varying dates; and the CRCA Addendum dated April 5, 2012. Cover Page 5/15/2012 COLORADO RIVER COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ARTICLE I Limitations on Denver Water’s Water Supply Obligations A. Geographic Limit on Service Area. All water available to Denver Water under its existing absolute and conditional water rights listed in Attachment A (“Attachment A Rights”) shall be used within the City and County of Denver and Denver Water’s current Service Area described in Attachment B (“Service Area”), except as provided in Article I.B.
    [Show full text]
  • C-BT) Is One of the Largest and Most Complex Natural Resource Developments Undertaken by the Bureau of Reclamation
    DESCRIPTION OF THE COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT The Colorado-Big Thompson Project (C-BT) is one of the largest and most complex natural resource developments undertaken by the Bureau of Reclamation. It consists of over 100 structures integrated into a transmountain water diversion system through which multiple benefits are provided. The C-BT spreads over approximately 250 miles in the State of Colorado. It stores, regulates, and diverts water from the Colorado River west of the Rocky Mountains, providing supplemental water for irrigation of 720,000 acres of land east of the Rocky Mountains. It also provides water for municipal use, industrial use, hydroelectric power, and water-oriented recreation. Major features of the C-BT include dams, dikes, reservoirs, powerplants, pumping plants, pipelines, tunnels, transmission lines, substations, and other associated structures (Table 1, Exhibits 1 and 2). Historically, the C-BT has diverted approximately 230,000 acre-feet of water annually (310,000 acre- feet maximum) from the Colorado River headwaters on the western slope to the South Platte River Basin on the eastern slope, for distribution to project lands and communities. The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District apportions the water used for irrigation to more than 120 ditches and 60 reservoirs. Twenty-nine communities receive municipal and industrial water from the C-BT. The Western Division of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program markets the electric power produced at the six powerplants. The western slope collection system captures runoff from the high mountains and stores, regulates, and conveys the water to Adams Tunnel for diversion to the east slope under the Continental Divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Dillon Ranger District Recreation Guide White River National Forest Summit County, Colorado
    Dillon Ranger District Recreation Guide White River National Forest Summit County, Colorado Please do your part to keep ermine THE SMALL BUT MIGHTY and all of Colorado’s wildlife WILD. GENERAL INFORMATION ERMINE BIKING/ erty to injury or damage. WALKING: The Damaging natural features rmines (Mustela ermine) are also called stoat, Summit County Rec- is prohibited. Please collect short-tailed weasels, or Bonaparte weasels. reational Pathway spent casings. EMore than 35 subspecies are known to System (Recpath) exist. Ermines are the most widespread weasel is a 55 mile long HUNTING: species worldwide and Colorado’s smallest, native network of paved pathways Allowed on Nation- carnivore. They’re found natively throughout opened to non-motorized al Forest lands uses. It runs throughout Sum- with certain restrictions and northern latitudes in Asia, Europe, and North mit County and to Vail. regulations. A valid Colorado America. They were also introduced into New hunting license, available Zealand in the 19th century to help control rabbit BOATING/ at businesses throughout populations. Their southernmost range in the SWIMMING: Boat- the county and online, is United States is Colorado and northern New ing is permitted on required. Check with Colo- Mexico and Arizona. Dillon Reservoir. rado Parks and Wildlife for Ermines are related to ferrets, minx, and Boating and swim- information. Dillon Ranger pine martens. They most commonly prey upon ming are permitted District does not sell hunting voles, mice, and other small rodents. Since they at Green Mountain Reser- licenses. are opportunistic predators, they may attack birds, voir. See Pg 2. fish, amphibians, lizards, invertebrates, rabbits, pi- Bill Linfield Photo LIVESTOCK: Sad- kas, and other animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Effects of Annually Diverting 131000 Acre-Feet of Water
    HYDROLOGlC EFFECTS OF ANNUALLY DIVERTING 131,000 ACRE-FEET OF WATER FROM DILLON RESERVOIR, CENTRAL COLORADO U,S. GEOLOGJCAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigations 79-2 Prepared in cooperation with th£ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA 1. Report No. 3. Recipient's Accession No. SHEET 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date HYDROLOGIC EFFECTS OF ANNUALLY DIVERTING 131,000 ACRE-FEET January 1979 OF WATER FROM DILLON RESERVOIR, CENTRAL COLORADO 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. W. M. Alley. D. P. Bauer, J. E. Veenhuis, and Robert Brennan No. USGS/WRI 79-2 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 0. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Denver Federal Center, Box 250^6, Mail Stop 11. Contract/Grant No. Lakewood, Colorado 80225 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Covered Denver Federal Center, Box 250^6, Mail Stop 415 Final Lakewood, Colorado 80225 14. 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 16. Abstracts Because of the increased demands for water in eastern Colorado, principally in the urbanizing Denver metropolitan area, increased di versionsj jof water from Oil Ion Reservoir are planned. Estimates of end-of-month storage in Dillon Reservoir, assuming the reservoir was in place and 131,000 acre-feet of water were diverted from the reser­ voir each year, were reconstructed by mass balance for the 1931-77 water years. Based on the analysis, the annual maximum end-of-month drawdown below ,,the elevation at full storage would have averaged 5k feet.
    [Show full text]