Why and How Does Manufacturing Still Matter: Old Rationales, New Realities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why and How Does Manufacturing Still Matter: Old Rationales, New Realities Revue d'économie industrielle 144 | 4e trimestre 2013 Manufacturing Renaissance (1/2) Why and How Does Manufacturing Still Matter: Old Rationales, New Realities Antonio Andreoni and Mike Gregory Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rei/5668 DOI: 10.4000/rei.5668 ISSN: 1773-0198 Publisher De Boeck Supérieur Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2013 Number of pages: 21-57 ISBN: 9782804185701 ISSN: 0154-3229 Electronic reference Antonio Andreoni and Mike Gregory, « Why and How Does Manufacturing Still Matter: Old Rationales, New Realities », Revue d'économie industrielle [Online], 144 | 4e trimestre 2013, Online since 01 December 2015, connection on 30 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rei/5668 ; DOI : 10.4000/rei.5668 © Revue d’économie industrielle WHY AND HOW DOES MANUFACTURING STILL MATTER: OLD RATIONALES, NEW REALITIES Antonio Andreoni* and Mike Gregory Centre for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge Keywords: Manufacturing, Service, Industrial Systems, Production Networks, Machine Tools, De-linking. Mots clés : Industrie, service, systèmes industriels, réseaux de production, mécanique, rupture. 1. INTRODUCTION Over the last three decades, the importance of manufacturing in the political economy debate has steadily declined. However, recent years have witnessed a renewed interest in manufacturing production its potential as an engine of technological dynamism and a source of the wealth of nations for which it was previously recognised. This has led analysts to identify a worldwide ‘manu- facturing renaissance’ emerging in different contexts with multiple focuses, observable in many white papers and scientific research. In particular, * Email corresponding author: [email protected]. The authors acknowledge helpful discussions and comments from Patrizio Bianchi, Ha-Joon Chang, Michael Landesmann, Eoin O’Sullivan and Bob Rowthorn. All mistakes remain ours. The Centre for Science, Technology & Innovation Policy gratefully acknowledges the generous support of the Gatsby Charitable Foundation. REVUE D’ÉCONOMIE INDUSTRIELLE ➻ N° 144 ➻ 4E TRIMESTRE 2013 21 WHY AND HOW DOES MANUFACTURING STILL MATTER: OLD RATIONALES, NEW REALITIES deindustrialisation, loss of strategic manufacturing industries, increasing trade imbalances, decreasing technological dynamism and industrial competi- tiveness have been major concerns in advanced economies. This paper aims to contribute to the renaissance of a manufacturing oriented view in two ways. The first contribution of the paper is to provide a critical review of the main turning points in the manufacturing versus services debate and evaluate the analytical and empirical arguments supporting the two opposing views. By sketching the tensions behind the service oriented view that have arisen as a result of the profound transformations in industrial systems and the redistribution of manufacturing production across countries over the last two decades (the current financial crisis and resulting manufacturing loss being just the peak of these global trends), a systematisation of old and new rationales supporting a manufacturing oriented view is presented. Many of the rationales put forward in the current debate would have been familiar in the 1960s and 1970s but are now supported by new empirical evidence. However detailed understanding of ‘how’ and ‘why’ manufac- turing matters is still limited. There are two main reasons for this insuf- ficiency. Firstly, without disaggregating the analysis from the macro level to the sub-sectors and even production activities/tasks levels, it is diffi- cult to say whether certain manufacturing industries matter more than others (still less why and how). Secondly, without taking into account the new realities of manufacturing systems and their configuration in global production networks, we are not able to identify the fundamental chan- nels through which certain manufacturing industries perform their ‘cat- alytic role’. Disentangling these new realities and, thus, identifying the new manufacturing oriented rationales, make an integration of econom- ics, engineering and operations management necessary. The second contribution of the paper is to explore the reasons why cer- tain manufacturing industries (such as the machine tools industry) are more important than others and why technological linkages stemming from manufacturing industries are key enablers of a country’s systemic capacity to generate technological change. This second issue is addressed by analysing the negative consequences of de-linking manufacturing pro- duction from services (off-shoring) which systematically disrupt the bun- dle of technological linkages constituting the industrial commons. 22 REVUE D’ÉCONOMIE INDUSTRIELLE ➻ N° 144 ➻ 4E TRIMESTRE 2013 WHY AND HOW DOES MANUFACTURING STILL MATTER: OLD RATIONALES, NEW REALITIES 2. ‘MAKING’ OR ‘DOING’: MOVING THE DEBATE FORWARD Does the wealth of nations, that is, their socio-economic development and technological power, mainly result from superior capacities in manufac- turing (i.e. making things) or in doing other activities (i.e. providing ser- vices)? Furthermore, do different sectors and/or production tasks performed within each sector contribute to economic growth in specific ways? Finally, to what extent can a sustained process of economic growth rely on the increasing relative expansion of the service sector? During the second half of the twentieth century, the political economy debate addressing these questions has witnessed two major turning points. Until the late 1970s, the debate was dominated by scholars working in the classical economics tradition who supported what we call here a manufactur- ing oriented view. Then, in the subsequent two decades of the twentieth cen- tury (1980s-2000) a service oriented view came to dominate and remained cen- tral to the academic and policy debate until the recent financial crisis. These two opposing views emerged in, and may partially reflect, the worldwide process of structural change and manufacturing development that started after the World War II. A snapshot of countries’ manufacturing develop- ment trajectories over the last half of the twentieth century, is essential to understand the context of the manufacturing versus services debate. 2.1. Manufacturing development: Some long-term stylised facts Eighteenth-century Great Britain was the first country to experience wide ranging and systematic manufacturing development with consequent rises in productivity and output. In the nineteenth century Belgium, Switzerland and France followed by the United States began to industri- alise. In due course latecomers including Germany, Russia and Japan joined the industrialising nations, while the developing world (both col- onies and non-colonies) remained oriented towards primary produc- tion (Gerschenkron, 1962; Maddison, 2007). This situation remained basi- cally unchanged until the World War II, with the partial exceptions of Argentina, Brazil and South Africa. This group took the opportunity to REVUE D’ÉCONOMIE INDUSTRIELLE ➻ N° 144 ➻ 4E TRIMESTRE 2013 23 WHY AND HOW DOES MANUFACTURING STILL MATTER: OLD RATIONALES, NEW REALITIES start their own manufacturing development process through import substitution because of the contraction of world trade during the Great Depression (1930s). After World War II more countries began to enter the ‘catch-up phase’ thanks to the increasing advantages of backwardness, the greater oppor- tunities for technology transfer and the industrial policies implemented by developmental states. This allowed them to enter the worldwide manu- facturing development race (Wade, 1990; Chang, 1994 and 2002; Amsden, 2001 and 2007; Reinert, 2007). At a first glance, three sets of stylised facts emerge as characteristic features of the last half of the twentieth century. First, there has been a worldwide process of structural change and quan- titative redistribution of manufacturing across countries. In 1950, when the manufacturing development process became a major worldwide phenom- enon, manufacturing constituted around 30 per cent of GDP in advanced economies while in developing countries the figure was around 12 per cent (see Figure 1). Among economies in the ‘catch up phase’ Latin America remained the most industrialised region until 1975 when the manufactur- ing sector started contracting to the point that, in 2005, the share of man- ufacturing in GDP had reverted to 1950s levels. The manufacturing devel- opment path followed by countries in Africa was on average almost flat, reaching its peak in 1990 and decreasing to 11 per cent (again a return to figures seen in 1950). In contrast manufacturing continued to increase in many Asian econo- mies throughout the last half-century with an impressive acceleration from 1965 to 1980. Finally, in the most advanced economies, the manufac- turing share started decreasing in the late 1960s, from 30 per cent to 18 per cent on average in less than a decade, although the absolute manufactur- ing output increased or remained stable (Maddison 2007; Szirmai 2011). During the second half of the last century, few East Asian economies expe- rienced a sustained catching up process responsible for the quantitative redistribution of world manufacturing value added shares and world man- ufactures trade. In 2010 the three most successful countries in East Asia, namely China, The Republic of Korea and China Taiwan Province taken as a whole accounted for
Recommended publications
  • Industrialisation
    1 Foreword ndustry has always played a vital role in development. It boosts economic activity INDUSTRIALISE I along value chains, from raw materials to finished products. It lifts productivity by introducing new equipment and new AFRICA techniques, increases the capabilities of the workforce, and diffuses these improvements into the wider economy. Industry also tends to generate formal employment, which in turn creates social stability. It improves the balance of trade by creating goods for export and replacing imports. Industrialisation, including the encouragement of manufacturing and processing capability, makes for strong and sustainable economic development, creating wealth in the economy. It is a prerequisite to Africa’s sustainable and inclusive growth, achievable through adding value by processing, packaging and marketing its raw materials. Africa must not miss opportunities for such linkages whenever and wherever they occur. There is a golden opportunity over the next few years as African economies pick up the pace. Africa is home to 5 of the 10 fastest-growing economies in the world, but this growth is unsustainable and non- inclusive since it is mostly driven by the export of unprocessed commodities with little value addition. We are starting from a low base. On average, industry generates merely $7001 1 `$` indicates US dollars throughout this text 2 of GDP per capita in Africa, less than a third of Latin America’s output ($2,500 per capita) and barely a fifth of East Asia’s ($3,400 per capita). To industrialise Africa, the African Development Bank is committed to mobilising capital, de-risking investments for the private sector, and leveraging capital markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Baskin, “Paradigm Dressed As Epoch: the Ideology of The
    Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: The Ideology of the Anthropocene JEREMY BASKIN School of Social and Political Sciences University of Melbourne Victoria 3010, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Anthropocene is a radical reconceptualisation of the relationship between humanity and nature. It posits that we have entered a new geological epoch in which the human species is now the dominant Earth-shaping force, and it is rapidly gaining traction in both the natural and social sciences. This article critically explores the scientific representation of the concept and argues that the Anthropocene is less a scientific concept than the ideational underpinning for a particular worldview. It is paradigm dressed as epoch. In particular, it normalises a certain portion of humanity as the ‘human’ of the Anthropocene, reinserting ‘man’ into nature only to re-elevate ‘him’ above it. This move pro- motes instrumental reason. It implies that humanity and its planet are in an exceptional state, explicitly invoking the idea of planetary management and legitimising major interventions into the workings of the earth, such as geoen- gineering. I conclude that the scientific origins of the term have diminished its radical potential, and ask whether the concept’s radical core can be retrieved. KEYWORDS Anthropocene, ideology, geoengineering, environmental politics, earth management INTRODUCTION ‘The Anthropocene’ is an emergent idea, which posits that the human spe- cies is now the dominant Earth-shaping force. Initially promoted by scholars from the physical and earth sciences, it argues that we have exited the current geological epoch, the 12,000-year-old Holocene, and entered a new epoch, Environmental Values 24 (2015): 9–29.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICAL ECONOMY of SINGAPORE's INDUSTRIALIZATION: National State and International Capital
    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SINGAPORE'S INDUSTRIALIZATION: National State and International Capital The Political Economy of Singapore's Industrialization: National State and International Capital GARRYRODAN Leclurer in Politics Murdoch University, Australia Pal grave Macmillan ISBN 978-1-349-19925-9 978-1-349-19923-5 (eBook) DOl 10.1007/978-1-349-19923-5 © Garry Rodan, 1989 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover 1st edition 1989 All rights reserved. For information, write: Scholarly and Reference Division, St. Martin's Press, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010 First published in the United States of America in 1989 ISBN 978-0-312-02412-3 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rodan, Garry, 1955- The political economy of Singapore's industrialization: national state and international capital/Garry Rodan. p. cm. Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-312-02412-3:$35.00 (est.) 1. Industry and state-Singapore. I. Title. HD3616.S423R64 1989 338.9595'7--dcI9 88-18174 CIP Dedicated to my parents, Betty and Ken Contents Acknowledgements viii Abbreviations ix List of Tables xi Prefatory Notes xii Preface xiii 1 Theoretical Introduction 1 2 Pre-Industrial Singapore: General Structural Developments up until 1959 31 3 The Political Pre-Conditions 50 4 Export-Oriented Manufacturing 85 5 Second Industrial Revolution 142 6 Singapore's Future as a NIC 189 7 Conclusions: Singapore and the New International 207 Division of Labour Notes 216 Bibliography 244 Index 258 VII Acknowledgements In their different ways, and to varying degrees, numerous people have contributed to the realisation of this book. The detailed critical comments and encouragement of my colleagues Richard Robinson and Richard Higgott have, however, made a special contribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Principles of Law for the Anthropocene?
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2014 Fundamental Principles of Law for the Anthropocene? Nicholas A. Robinson Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Nicholas A. Robinson, Fundamental Principles of Law for the Anthropocene?, 44 Envtl. Pol’y & L. 13 (2014), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/964/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Environmental Policy and Law, 44/1-2 (2014) 13 Normative Aspects of Sustainability Fundamental Principles of Law for the Anthropocene? by Nicholas A. Robinson* In May of 2013, the atmospheric monitoring station the Anthropocene represents. Many of our “business-as- atop Mauna Loa, the volcano in Hawaii, recorded carbon usual” assumptions no longer are reliable. Nations are dioxide at 400 parts per million for the first time since it reacting to the new demands by promulgating substantive began operating in the 1950s. From analysis of Antarctic environmental rights and procedural means to enforce ice cores, Earth has not seen a concentration this high in those rights. Environmental rights seek to shift society 400,000 years.1 As Svante Arrhenius determined in 1896, toward attaining societal wellbeing, or happiness, and not along with water vapour, carbon dioxide retains the sun’s economic growth as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Development and Growth in Nigeria: Lessons and Challenges
    Working Paper No. 8 Industrial development and growth in Nigeria: Lessons and challenges L. N. Chete, J. O. Adeoti, F. M. Adeyinka, and O. Ogundele* Abstract The structure of the Nigerian economy is typical of an underdeveloped country. The primary sector, in particular, the oil and gas sector, dominates the gross domestic product accounting for over 95 per cent of export earnings and about 85 per cent of government revenue between 2011 and 2012. The industrial sector accounts for 6 per cent of economic activity while the manufacturing sector contributed only 4 per cent to GDP in 2011. The economic transformation agenda, otherwise known as Nigeria Vision 20: 2020, sets the direction for the current industrial policy in Nigeria. The industrialization strategy aims at achieving greater global competitiveness in the production of processed and manufactured goods by linking industrial activity with primary sector activity, domestic and foreign trade, and service activity. Keywords: industrialization, mixed economy, cooperative, garment sector, Cambodia JEL classification: L2, L52 1 *Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER), Ibadan, corresponding author email: [email protected] The Brookings Institution is a private non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined or influenced by any donation. Learning to Compete (L2C) is a collaborative research program of the Africa Growth Initiative at Brookings (AGI), the African Development Bank, (AfDB), and the United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER) on industrial development in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Parts. Refined
    Plastic parts. Refined. AMB helps customers with the highest standards achieve their goals by combining the best expertise and stable Mission processes with an unsurpassed level of service. AMB should be a role model in injection molding and Vision surface treatment of plastics. Plastic parts. Refined. Our Swedish heritage AMB was founded in Broakulla 1946 by Osvald Astervall, Ragnar Magnusson and Helge Bergkvist. The company is today owned by the Magnusson family in the third generation. Plastic parts. Refined. Locations Sales office Nora HQ/Production unit Sales office Gothenburg Broakulla Tingverken (subsidiary) Tingsryd Plastic parts. Refined. Key figures Turnover/EBIT (MSEK) Share of turnover (%) 250 200 150 100 50 0 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 Lighting Electronics Industry Medtech Plastic parts. Refined. Our offer Product & process Procurement & Project Validation & Production & value Packaging & support purchasing management & documentation creation logistics quality assurance Plastic parts. Refined. Market segments INDUSTRIAL FUNCTIONAL MEDTECH ELECTRONICS SOLUTIONS DESIGN Plastic parts. Refined. Processes ADVANCED SURFACE INJECTION MOULDING ASSEMBLY TREATMENT 25–550 T CLAMPING FORCE VACUUM METALLISATION EPA AND CLEANROOM CLEANROOM PRODUCTION PLASMA POLYMERISATION LOW AND HIGH VOLUME 2K MOULDING COLOUR AND EFFECT LABELLING AND JOINING PAINTING STERILE PACKAGING Plastic parts. Refined. Production facilities/HQ Metallisation Injection moulding Cleanroom 1 HQ Office Warehouse Painting Office Cleanroom 2 IN TOTAL: 15,500
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Technological Revolution on Labour Markets and Income Distribution
    Department of Economic & Social Affairs FRONTIER ISSUES 31 JULY 2017 The impact of the technological revolution on labour markets and income distribution CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................... 1 1. Introduction ....................................................... 3 2. A new technological revolution? ....................................... 4 A. Technological progress and revolutions ............................. 4 B. Economic potential of the new technological breakthroughs ............. 7 3. Long term and recent trends .......................................... 8 A. Productivity trends .............................................. 8 B. Sectoral employment shifts and work conditions ..................... 11 C. Income inequality .............................................. 14 4. How does technological innovation affect labour markets and inequality? ..... 17 A. Job destruction and job creation ................................. 17 B. Occupational shifts, job polarization and wage inequality .............. 20 C. Technology and globalization .................................... 21 D. Technology and market structures. .22 E. Technology and the organization of work ........................... 23 F. Technology and the informal sector ............................... 23 G. Technology and female labour force participation .................... 24 5. Looking ahead: What will technology mean for labour and inequality? ........ 26 A. The future of technological progress ............................... 26
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Opportunities of Digital Production Technologies for Developing Countries Department of Policy, Research and Statistics Working Paper 7/2019
    Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series WP 7 | 2019 A REVOLUTION IN THE MAKING? CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF DIGITAL PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DEPARTMENT OF POLICY, RESEARCH AND STATISTICS WORKING PAPER 7/2019 A revolution in the making? Challenges and opportunities of digital production technologies for developing countries Antonio Andreoni UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Guendalina Anzolin University of Urbino UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna, 2019 This is a Background Paper for the UNIDO Industrial Development Report 2020: Industrializing in the Digital Age The designations employed, descriptions and classifications of countries, and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Secretariat of the UNIDO. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO nor its member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from the use of the material. Terms such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment. Any indication of, or reference to, a country, institution or other legal entity does not constitute an endorsement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: a Cross-Country/Region Comparison
    ISSN 1980-5411 (On-line version) Production, 28, e20180061, 2018 DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20180061 The impact of the fourth industrial revolution: a cross-country/region comparison Yongxin Liaoa*, Eduardo Rocha Louresa, Fernando Deschampsa, Guilherme Brezinskia, André Venâncioa aPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil *[email protected] Abstract The fourth industrial revolution stimulates the advances of science and technology, in which the Internet of Things (IoT) and its supporting technologies serve as backbones for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and smart machines are used as the promoters to optimize production chains. Such advancement goes beyond the organizational and territorial boundaries, comprising agility, intelligence, and networking. This scenario triggers governmental efforts that aim at defining guidelines and standards. The speed and complexity of the transition to the new digitalization era in a globalized environment, however, does not yet allow a common and coordinated understanding of the impacts of the actions undertaken in different countries and regions. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to bridge this gap through a systematic literature review that identifies the most influential public policies and evaluates their existing differences. This cross-country/region comparison provides a worldwide panorama of public policies’ durations, main objectives, available funding, areas for action, focused manufacturing sectors, and prioritized technologies. Findings of this review can be used as the basis to analyse the position of a country against the existing challenges imposed towards its own industrial infrastructure and also to coordinate its public policies. Keywords The fourth industrial revolution. Cross-country/region comparison. Systematic literature review. Qualitative analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • State, Economy and Empire Module 1 Industrial Revolution and The
    Making of Modern Europe: State, Economy and Empire Module 1 Industrial revolution and the emergence of Industrial Societies in Europe Script Introduction As late as the middle of 18th century, majority of the people in Europe lived in the countryside. It is estimated that over 90% of the people in East Europe – i.e. Russia, Scandinavia, the Baltic and the Balkans – used to live in rural areas. Even in Italy, one of the principal centres of urban life in Europe, only 25-30% of the people used to reside within the perimeters of the city areas. If London (with a population of nearly 1 million) and Paris (half a million) are left out, then only about twenty cities had a population above 100,000; most cities and towns had populations ranging between two and twenty thousand. The state of transport and communications was such that it was easier for news to travel between two capitals, rather than between town and country. The news of the fall of Bastille, for instance, reached Madrid, the capital of Spain, 13 days after the incident, but it took one more day to reach Peron, a settlement merely 133 km from Paris. This picture changed almost totally within the next century almost everywhere in Europe with an exponential expansion of the urban areas, coupled with a dramatic change in the nature and tempo of urban life. The relative significance of agriculture in the economy declined sharply on account of some breathtaking changes in the manufacturing sector. With the growing significance of industry in European economic life, a new era of urbanisation dawned.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming and Agricultural Industrialisation Martin Bruegel
    Farming and Agricultural Industrialisation Martin Bruegel To cite this version: Martin Bruegel. Farming and Agricultural Industrialisation. Food and Drink in History. Re- search data base : http://www.foodanddrink.amdigital.co.uk/ResearchTools/Essays/Farming Adam Matthew Digital : primary sources for teaching and research, 2020. hal-02951824 HAL Id: hal-02951824 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02951824 Submitted on 29 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Bruegel, Martin. "Farming and Agricultural Industrialisation." Food and Drink in History. 2020. http://www.foodanddrink.amdigital.co.uk/ResearchTools/Essays/Farming Farming and Agricultural Industrialisation Martin Bruegel, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique The world's population grew from 990 million in 1800 to 1.65 billion in 1900, then jumped to 6 billion in 2000. A bundle of factors pushed demography. While better sanitary conditions improved health, drove down mortality, and enhanced longevity, agricultural development boosted food production. Farming output not only sustained population growth, it outpaced it enough to help increase average caloric intake per head. To be sure, nutritional inequality remains pervasive today. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia still suffer from inadequate supplies, and food poverty persists in advanced economies [see, for ex., Hunger in America, 1985].
    [Show full text]
  • Industrialisation Unlocking the Efficiency and Agility of the Swiss Banking Industry
    Industrialisation Unlocking the efficiency and agility of the Swiss banking industry August 2016 Contents 1. Introduction and key findings 01 2. Swiss banking: pressures continue 03 3. Industrialisation as response 06 4. Banks’ industrialisation plans 10 5. Our perspective: A call for action 22 Bibliography 29 Appendix 30 Authors & contributors 31 Acknowledgment We would like to thank all participating executives for their support in completing the survey and sharing their expertise in the interviews with us. Industrialisation | Unlocking the efficiency and agility of the Swiss banking industry 1. Introduction and key findings Since the financial crisis the Swiss Banking industry has been under tremendous pressure. An unfavourable economic climate, rising expectations of empowered customers, increased regulatory focus and intense on- and offshore competition have reduced the revenue margins as a percentage of assets under management of Swiss banks by 21 per cent between 2010 and 2015. Combined with the emergence of FinTech entrants and disruptive technologies, these trends are creating an urgent need for innovation, and also to cut costs and improve agility in order to fund and execute new business models. In recent years many banks have limited themselves to taking only tactical cost reduction measures. We believe it is now time to improve agility and efficiency by industrialising how banks operate. The objective of industrialisation is to eliminate redundancies, re-engineer the value chain, automate and standardise processes wherever possible, while providing transparency about the profit of activities. In collaboration with the Hochschule Luzern, Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen (IFZ), we have conducted an online survey and personal interviews with executives from Swiss banks on their current levels of industrialisation and their industrialisation strategies for the next five years.
    [Show full text]