Emission and Abundance of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds in Wind-Throw Areas of Upland Spruce Forests in Bavaria Benjamin S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Technische Universität München Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt Lehrstuhl für Atmosphärische Umweltforschung Emission and abundance of biogenic volatile organic compounds in wind-throw areas of upland spruce forests in Bavaria Benjamin S. J. Wolpert Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Reinhard Schopf Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Hans Peter Schmid, Ph.D. 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Annette Menzel 3. Prof. Jose Fuentes, Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University, USA (nur schriftliche Beurteilung) Die Dissertation wurde am 02.05.2012 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 07.09.2012 angenommen. Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................. 1 1.1. Motivation ................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Biogenic volatile organic compounds .......................................................... 2 1.3. Monoterpenoids .......................................................................................... 3 1.4. Functional relationship of monoterpenes and plants ................................... 5 1.4.1. Protection of plants against oxidative stress and heat .......................... 6 1.4.2. VOC mediated plant defense ............................................................... 7 1.4.3. Plant reproduction and signaling .......................................................... 8 1.5. Synthesis of terpenes in plants ................................................................... 8 1.6. Environmental control of monoterpene emission ...................................... 10 1.7. Scientific interest in biogenic volatile organic compounds ........................ 12 1.7.1. Oxidation capacity of the atmosphere ................................................ 13 1.7.2. Ozone ................................................................................................. 15 1.7.3. Secondary organic aerosols (SOA) .................................................... 18 1.7.4. Carbon balance .................................................................................. 19 1.7.5. Plant insect interaction ....................................................................... 20 1.8. Objectives ................................................................................................. 21 2. Site description ..................................................................... 24 2.1. The Bavarian Forest National Park ........................................................... 24 2.1.1. The wind-throw situation in the Bavarian Forest National Park .......... 25 2.1.2. Measurement site Lackenberg ........................................................... 26 2.1.3. Inventory of the dead wood material at the Lackenberg ..................... 27 2.1.4. Vegetation at the Lackenberg ............................................................. 28 2.1.5. Instrumentation of the measurement site Lackenberg ........................ 29 2.1.5.1. The gradient system ........................................................................... 33 2.2. The National Park Berchtesgaden ............................................................ 34 2.2.1. The wind-throw situation in the National Park Berchtesgaden ........... 35 2.2.2. Measurement site Kühroint................................................................. 36 2.2.3. Vegetation at the Kühroint site ........................................................... 38 2.2.4. Instrumentation of the measurement site Kühroint ............................. 39 2.3. The climatic situation at the measurement sites Lackenberg and Kühroint .................................................................................................... 43 2.4. Comparison of meteorological data collected at the measurement sites to data of nearby weather stations ............................................................ 47 2.4.1. Comparison of the station Lackenberg to the Meteomedia station at the Falkenstein ................................................................................... 48 2.4.2. Comparison of the station Kühroint to the station of the Bavarian Avalanche Warning Service ............................................................... 48 2.5. The radiation surface temperature as indication for the dead wood stem temperature .............................................................................................. 49 3. Methods ................................................................................. 52 3.1. VOC Analysis ............................................................................................ 52 3.1.1. Pre-concentration on adsorption tubes ............................................... 52 3.1.2. VOC sampling during measurement campaigns ................................ 53 3.1.3. Preparation of VOC standards for calibrations by a diffusion system . 54 3.1.4. Permeation rates of the diffusion system............................................ 56 3.1.5. Monoterpene gas mixture as calibration standard .............................. 58 3.1.6. Analysis of VOCs with gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) ............................................................................................. 58 3.1.7. Identification of VOCs in the GC-MS .................................................. 60 3.1.8. Quantification of VOCs in the GC-MS ................................................ 62 3.1.9. Determination of the monoterpene pool in the dead wood at the Lackenberg ......................................................................................... 67 3.2. Flux measurements .................................................................................. 68 3.2.1. Gradient technique ............................................................................. 69 3.2.1.1. The surface layer gradient technique (SLG) ....................................... 70 3.2.1.2. Determination of the zero plane displacement from logarithmic wind profiles ................................................................................................ 72 3.2.1.3. The modified Bowen Ratio Method (MBR) ......................................... 73 3.2.2. Uncertainties in the flux measurements.............................................. 74 3.2.3. Transport times and reactivities of the investigated volatile organic compounds ......................................................................................... 80 3.2.4. Data processing ................................................................................. 81 3.2.4.1. Data processing of the eddy covariance measurements .................... 81 3.2.4.2. Data processing of the modified Bowen ratio ..................................... 82 4. Results and discussion ........................................................ 84 4.1. Monoterpene levels in ambient air at the Lackenberg site ........................ 84 4.1.1. The daily variation of the monoterpene air concentration at the Lackenberg ......................................................................................... 87 4.1.2. The variability of the monoterpene air concentration at the Lackenberg during the year ................................................................ 92 4.2. Monoterpene levels in ambient air at the Kühroint site ............................. 95 4.2.1. The daily variation of the monoterpene air concentration at the Kühroint site ....................................................................................... 98 4.2.2. The variability of the monoterpene air concentration at the Kühroint site during the year ........................................................................... 102 4.3. Monoterpene fluxes ................................................................................ 102 4.3.1. Determination of the aerodynamic resistance by the modified Bowen ratio method (example day: 08.07.2010) .............................. 104 4.3.2. Determination of the aerodynamic resistance by the surface layer gradient technique (example day: 08.07.2010) ................................ 106 4.3.3. Determination of the emission of-pinene by the MBR and SLG (example day: 08.07.2010) ............................................................... 107 4.3.4. Comparison of emissions calculated by MBR and SLG technique ... 109 4.3.5. Relation between the emission of -pinene and micrometeorological parameters (example day:12.07.2011) ............ 110 4.3.6. The diurnal course of the monoterpene emission at the Lackenberg (example day:12.07.2011) ................................................................ 112 4.3.7. Development of a model describing the monoterpene emissions by the surface temperature ................................................................... 113 4.3.8. The monoterpene emission pattern at the Lackenberg site .............. 117 4.3.9. The annual monoterpene emission .................................................. 118 4.3.10. The monoterpene content of the dead wood at the Lackenberg site 120 4.3.11. Determination of the total monoterpene pool in the