Bismuth Subsalicylate Inthe Treatment of H2 Blocker Resistant Duodenal Ulcers: Role of Helicobacter Pylori

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bismuth Subsalicylate Inthe Treatment of H2 Blocker Resistant Duodenal Ulcers: Role of Helicobacter Pylori Gut, 1992, 33, 179-183 179 Bismuth subsalicylate in the treatment of H2 blocker resistant duodenal ulcers: role ofHelicobacterpylori Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.33.2.179 on 1 February 1992. Downloaded from S Wagner, M Gebel, K Haruma, W Bar, P Lange, J Freise, U Gladziwa, F W Schmidt Abstract patients with endoscopically proved H2 blocker Fifty nine patients with Helicobacter pylon resistant duodenal ulcers were recruited to the positive duodenal ulcers that failed to heal study. A resistant duodenal ulcer was defined as after a six week course of treatment with H2 one that failed to heal after at least six weeks' blockers were randomly assigned to one of the continuous treatment with cimetidine 800 mg following three regimens: (i) bismuth subsali- daily or ranitidine 300 mg daily. The largest cylate, 600 mg three times daily (n=19), (ii) ulcer diameter was not less than 5 mm. The ranitidine, 300 mg at night (n=20), (iii) bismuth patients did not have complications of peptic subsalicylate plus ranitidine (n=20). Cumula- ulcer disease, previous gastric surgery, concomi- tive ulcer healing rates after four and eight tant treatment with ulcerogenic drugs, anti- weeks respectively were as follows: bismuth coagulants, or antibiotics, or any serious chronic subsalicylate 74% (14/19) and 95% (18/19), disease. Only patients who had not had antibiotic ranitidine 40% (8/20) and 65% (13/20), bismuth treatment in the previous six months were subsalicylate plus ranitidine 80% (16/20) and included. 95% (19/20). Bismuth subsalicylate treatment At initial endoscopy the ulcer size was assessed was better than ranitidine at both four and at and antral biopsy specimens were taken for eight weeks (p<0*05). The clearance rates for histological examination and H pylori screening. H pylon after four weeks were: bismuth sub- All patients were H pylori positive. Detailed subsalicylate 58%, ranitidine 0%, bismuth sub- information on duration and age of onset of salicylate plus ranitidine 55%. After stopping dyspeptic symptoms, previous drug therapy, bismuth therapy bacterial recrudescence fre- previous ulcer complications, and social habits quently occurred. After bismuth treatment were recorded. 86% (19/22) ofulcers had healed ifHpylori had After giving informed verbal consent, patients been cleared, whereas only 65% (11/17) had were randomised by a nurse (to guarantee blind- healed if H pylon persisted (NS). This study ness of the investigators) using given regimens shows that bismuth subsalicylate is more effec- stratified for 63 subjects. Randomisation pro- tive in the treatment of resistant duodenal cedure was accomplished by a computer pro- http://gut.bmj.com/ ulcers than standard dose ranitidine. It may be gram. Patients were allocated to receive one of that suppression of H pylori by bismuth sub- the following three treatment regimens: (i) salicylate promotes ulcer healing. bismuth subsalicylate (Jatrox) 600 mg three times daily (two chewable tablets half an hour before the three meals); (ii) ranitidine (Zantac) Approximately 85-95% of duodenal ulcers heal 300 mg at night; (iii) bismuth subsalicylate 600 on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. within six to eight weeks of treatment with mg three times daily plus ranitidine 300 mg at Departments of standard doses of H2 blockers. '2 The reasons for night. Treatment began within three days of the Gastroenterology and treatment failure remain unclear but inadequate initial endoscopy and was continued for four Hepatology and Clinical control of acid secretion may be a weeks. If healing had occurred after four weeks Microbiology, crucial Medizinische factor.'3 Recently, the identification of Helico- the treatment was stopped; if not the patient Hochschule Hannover, bacter pyloni and its association with duodenal continued on the same regimen for another four Germany ulcer disease led to the hypothesis that H pylon weeks. If at the end of eight weeks the ulcer had S Wagner M Gebel might be involved in H2 blocker resistant ulcera- not healed the patient was withdrawn from the W Bar tion.2 The successful treatment of H2 blocker trial and ranitidine 900 mg/day was given. No P Lange refractory ulcers by colloidal bismuth subcitrate, other medications were allowed during the study J Freise F W Schmidt which is able to eliminate H pylon, supports this period. theory.4 5 Unfortunately, the role of H pylon was Compliance was ascertained by counting the Department of Medicine, not investigated in these therapeutic trials. number of remaining tablets at the end of each Rheinisch-Westfalische treatment Technische Hochschule Bismuth salts exert bactericidal effects on period. Clinical symptoms were asses- Aachen, Germany H pylon and have cytoprotective properties as sed by recording the number and severity ofpain U Gladziwa well, thus it is not clear whether the beneficial episodes on a diary card. Endoscopy and Hpylon tests were First Department of effect of colloidal bismuth in refractory ulcers is screening repeated every four weeks Internal Medicine, directly related to the elimination ofH pylon. during the course of treatment and four weeks Hiroshima University This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of after the end of the trial. School of Medicine, bismuth in the treatment of refrac- Hiroshima, Japan subsalicylate K Haruma tory duodenal ulcers and to elucidate the role of Correspondence to: H pylon. ENDOSCOPY Dr S Wagner, Department of Endoscopies were performed by PL, SW and JF Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medizinische who were not aware of the clinical data, the bac- Hochschule Hannover, Methods teriological findings, or the treatment regimen. D-3000 Hannover 61, Germany. At each endoscopy five biopsy specimens were Accepted for publication PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN taken with sterilised biopsy forceps from antral 7 May 1991 Between September 1987 and May 1990 out- mucosa 2 cm proximal to the pylorus. Two 180 Wagner, Gebel, Haruma, Bar, Lange, Freise, Gladziwa, Schmidt specimens were placed in 2 ml phosphate STATISTICS buffered saline at 4°C for bacteriological exami- Statistical analysis was carried out by the X2 test nation, two were fixed in 10% formalin for for the evaluation of the healing rates and by the histopathology, and one specimen was used for a matched pairs Wilcoxon signed rank test for Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.33.2.179 on 1 February 1992. Downloaded from rapid urease detecting test (CLO-test, Delta analysis of H pylon and gastritis scores. Differ- West Ltd, Australia). In addition, smears of ences with p values less than 0 05 were con- biopsy specimens were made for cytological sidered significant. examination using Giemsa staining. Results H PYLORI SCREENING Four ofthe 63 patients who entered the trial were H pylon status was assessed by bacterial culture, lost during follow up (bismuth subsalicylate, n= a modified Giemsa stain, and the CLO-test as 2, ranitidine, n= 1, bismuth subsalicylate plus described previously.6 Two biopsy specimens ranitidine, n= 1). Fifty nine patients completed were cultured under microaerobic conditions in the study and their characteristics are shown in blood agar base containing 5% horse blood and Table I. There were no major differences Skirrow selective supplement for seven days. between the three treatment groups. Median Cultures were considered positive for H pylori if age, sex ratio, mean duration of ulcer history, Gram negative, oxidase positive, catalase smoking habits, and previous H2 blocker positive, and urease positive spiral rods were therapy were comparable (Table I). All patients present. The degree ofcolonisation with Hpylori were H pylon positive. No relevant side effects was estimated by examination of sections and were observed in any treatment group. smears stained with Giemsa and was graded Figure 1 summarises the outcome of the semiquantitatively as follows: 0=no organism; patients under the different regimens. After four 1= occasional; 2 = moderate; 3= large numbers. weeks, ulcer healing had occurred in 74% (14/19) Hpylon status was regarded as positive ifculture of patients receiving bismuth subsalicylate, in was positive or ifthe urease test and Giemsa stain 40% (8/20) of those receiving ranitidine, and in were positive. 80% (16/20) of those treated with a combination The term 'clearance' was used ifHpylon status of both regimens (Table II). In patients with was negative immediately after stopping treat- incomplete ulcer healing the same therapeutic ment. 'Eradication' was used if H pylon was regimen was continued for another four weeks. absent four weeks after the end of treatment. After eight weeks' treatment the cumulative healing percentages were 95% on bismuth sub- HISTOPATHOLOGY salicylate, 65% on ranitidine, and 95% on bis- For histological examinations, formalin fixed muth ranitidine. The healing subsalicylate plus http://gut.bmj.com/ biopsy samples were embedded in paraffin and rate on bismuth subsalicylate alone or in combi- sections (4 ,tm) were stained with haematoxylin nation with ranitidine was significantly higher and eosin and Giemsa. Each biopsy specimen compared with that on ranitidine, both at four was assessed for the presence, type, density and and at eight weeks (p<005). There was, how- localisation of the inflammatory infiltrate. The ever, no significant difference between bismuth degree ofactivity ofgastritis was graded (0-3) by subsalicylate as a single agent and in combination estimating the density of polymorphonuclear with ranitidine. After eight weeks there was no leukocyte infiltrates as described previously.6 ulcer relapse in patients whose ulcers had healed on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. during a four week course of bismuth subsali- cylate while two ulcers relapsed in the ranitidine group. TABLE I Patient characteristics and treatment schedules After four weeks H pylori was cleared in 58% of patients receiving bismuth subsalicylate and BSS Ranitidine BSS (3x600 mg) plus in 55% of those treated with bismuth subsalicy- (3 x 600 mg) (300 mg) ranitidine (300 mg) late plus ranitidine, while none of the patients in Patients (n) 19 20 20 the ranitidine group was Hpylon negative (Table Sex (male) 15 13 16 Median age (yrs) 46 47 43 II).
Recommended publications
  • Combination Therapy for Peptic Ulcer Treatment
    Office europeen des brevets © Publication number: 0 480 691 A2 © EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number : 91309249.0 © int. ci.5: A61K 33/24, A61K 31/60, A61K 31/44, A61K 31/425, © Date of filing : 09.10.91 //(A61K33/24, 31:44, 31:425), (A61K31/60, 31:44, 31:425), (A61K31/44, 31:195), (A61K31/425, 31:195) © Priority: 11.10.90 US 595908 © Inventor: Berlin, Roger G. 519 Mulberry Lane Haverford, PA 19041 (US) (43) Date of publication of application : 15.04.92 Bulletin 92/16 @ Representative : Thompson, John Dr. et al Merck & Co., Inc. European Patent @) Designated Contracting States : Department Terlings Park Eastwick Road CH DE FR GB IT LI NL Harlow, Essex CM20 2QR (GB) © Applicant : MERCK & CO. INC. 126, East Lincoln Avenue P.O. Box 2000 Rahway New Jersey 07065-0900 (US) © Combination therapy for peptic ulcer treatment. © Peptic ulcer disease is treated with a combination therapy of famotidine or omeprazole plus a bismuth salt. CM < CO o 00 LU Jouve, 18, rue Saint-Denis, 75001 PARIS EP 0 480 691 A2 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In the past, treatment of peptic ulcer disease was based on either neutralization of intragastric acidity with antacids or the inhibition of production of acid secretion by H2-receptor antagonists or by proton pump inhibition 5 among others. Using bismuth salts alone to heal ulcers has been shown to be effective presumably because of its effect on Helicobacter pylori. Relapse of Helicobacter positivity, however, has been a problem as has relapse of ulcer disease in patients treated with antisecretory therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toronto Consensus for the Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Adults Carlo A
    Gastroenterology 2016;151:51–69 CONSENSUS STATEMENT The Toronto Consensus for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Adults Carlo A. Fallone,1 Naoki Chiba,2,3 Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten,4 Lori Fischbach,5 Javier P. Gisbert,6 Richard H. Hunt,3,7 Nicola L. Jones,8 Craig Render,9 Grigorios I. Leontiadis,3,7 Paul Moayyedi,3,7 and John K. Marshall3,7 1Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 2Guelph GI and Surgery Clinic, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; 3Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 4Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 5Department of Epidemiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; 6Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain; 7Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 8Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Departments of Paediatrics and Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and 9Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity, also eligible for MOC credit, on page e25. Learning Objective: Upon completion of this examination, successful learners will be able to establish a treatment plan for patients with H pylori infection. BACKGROUND & AIMS: Helicobacter pylori infection is lthough the prevalence of H pylori is decreasing in increasingly difficult to treat. The purpose of these consensus A some parts of the world, the infection remains pre- statements is to provide a review of the literature and specific, sent in 28% to 84% of subjects depending on the population updated recommendations for eradication therapy in adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Levofloxacin, Metronidazole, and Lansoprazole Triple Therapy Compared to Quadruple Therapy As a Second-Line Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Korea
    Gut and Liver, Vol. 7, No. 4, July 2013, pp. 406-410 ORiginal Article Levofloxacin, Metronidazole, and Lansoprazole Triple Therapy Compared to Quadruple Therapy as a Second-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea Ji Yoon Moon*, Gwang Ha Kim*, Hyun Seok You†, Bong Eun Lee*, Dong Yeop Ryu*, Jae Hoon Cheong*, Jung Im Jung*, Jae Hoon Jeong‡, Chul Soo Song‡, and Geun Am Song* *Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, †Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Medical Center, and ‡Department of Internal Medicine, Good Samsun Hospital, Busan, Korea Background/Aims: Several rescue therapies have been rec- INTRODUCTION ommended to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection in pa- tients with a failure of first-line eradication therapy, but they Helicobacter pylori infection is recognized as an important still fail in more than 20% of cases. The aim of this study was contributor to nonulcer dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, gastric to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin, metroni- mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric dazole, and lansoprazole (LML) triple therapy relative to qua- cancer. Eradication of H. pylori significantly reduces the re- druple therapy as a second-line treatment. Methods: In total, lapse rate of peptic ulcer disease.1,2 A triple therapy, comprising 113 patients who failed first-line triple therapy for H. pylori amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), infection were randomly assigned to two groups: LML for 7 is the first-line treatment suggested by international guide- days and tetracycline, bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and lines.3-5 However, several large clinical trials have shown that lansoprazole (quadruple) for 7 days.
    [Show full text]
  • OMECLAMOX-PAK (Omeprazole, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin) PREVPAC (Lansoprazole, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin) PYLERA (Bism
    OMECLAMOX-PAK (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) PREVPAC (lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) PYLERA (bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, tetracycline) TALICIA (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and rifabutin) RATIONALE FOR INCLUSION IN PA PROGRAM Background Prevpac and Omeclamox-Pak are a copackaged product containing a proton pump inhibitor, a macrolide antimicrobial, and a penicillin class antibacterial that, when taken together, is indicated for the eradication of Heliobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease that is active or up to a one year history. Pylera is a copackaged product containing two antimicrobials; metronidazole, tetracycline and bismuth subcitrate potassium. Pylera is also used to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in patients with H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease; Pylera is FDA-approved for use only in combination with omeprazole. Talicia is a three-drug combination of a proton pump inhibitor, a penicillin-class antibacterial, and a rifamycin antibacterial. Eradication of H. pylori has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence (1-4). It is important to treat H. pylori infection because it has been identified as a risk factor in the development of peptic ulcer, duodenal ulcer, atrophic gastritis, gastric cancer, and mucosal- associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, as well as, a possible risk factor for the development idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and anemia (1-4). Regulatory Status The components in Prevpac, Pylera and Omeclamox-Pak are indicated for the treatment of patients with H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease (active or one-year history of a duodenal ulcer) to eradicate H. pylori (1-3). The components in Talicia are indicated for the treatment of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services
    Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services Australian Statistics on Medicines 1997 i © Commonwealth of Australia 1998 ISBN 0 642 36772 8 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be repoduced by any process without written permission from AusInfo. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT 2601. Publication approval number 2446 ii FOREWORD The Australian Statistics on Medicines (ASM) is an annual publication produced by the Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee (DUSC) of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Comprehensive drug utilisation data are required for a number of purposes including pharmacosurveillance and the targeting and evaluation of quality use of medicines initiatives. It is also needed by regulatory and financing authorities and by the Pharmaceutical Industry. A major aim of the ASM has been to put comprehensive and valid statistics on the Australian use of medicines in the public domain to allow access by all interested parties. Publication of the Australian data facilitates international comparisons of drug utilisation profiles, and encourages international collaboration on drug utilisation research particularly in relation to enhancing the quality use of medicines and health outcomes. The data available in the ASM represent estimates of the aggregate community use (non public hospital) of prescription medicines in Australia. In 1997 the estimated number of prescriptions dispensed through community pharmacies was 179 million prescriptions, a level of increase over 1996 of only 0.4% which was less than the increase in population (1.2%).
    [Show full text]
  • Bismuth Subcitrate
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Tooth Enamel discoloration and hypoplasia: permanent discoloration may These highlights do not include all the information needed to use develop with use during tooth development (last half of pregnancy, PYLERA safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for infancy, and childhood to the age of 8 years). (5.4) PYLERA • Central and Peripheral Nervous System Effects: encephalopathy, ® convulsive seizures, aseptic meningitis and peripheral neuropathy with PYLERA (bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, tetracycline metronidazole, intracranial hypertension with tetracycline and hydrochloride) capsules, for oral use neurotoxicity with bismuth-containing products. Monitor patients with Initial U.S. Approval: 2006 CNS conditions closely and discontinue promptly if abnormal neurologic signs develop. (5.5) WARNING: POTENTIAL FOR CARCINOGENICITY • Photosensitivity: avoid exposure to sun and sun lamps. (5.7) See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning • Blood Dyscrasias: Use with caution in patients with a history of blood dyscrasias (5.9) Metronidazole has been shown to be carcinogenic in mice and rats. It is • Hepatic Impairment: Use with caution in patients with hepatic unknown whether metronidazole is associated with carcinogenicity in impairment. (5.10) humans (5.1). • Cutaneous Reactions: Stevens-Johnson, toxic epidermal necrolysis, DRESS syndrome. Discontinue treatment at the first evidence of a ----------------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES--------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • H. Pylori Infection Products
    Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy Effective Date ............................................ 7/1/2021 Next Review Date… ..................................... 7/1/2022 Coverage Policy Number ............................... IP0009 H. Pylori Infection Products Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Overview .............................................................. 1 Coverage Policy Statement ................................. 1 FDA Indication Criteria ......................................... 2 Other Uses with Supportive Evidence Criteria .... 2 Specific Additional Criteria ................................... 2 Preferred Product Requirement Criteria .............. 2 Conditions Not Covered....................................... 3 Background .......................................................... 3 References .......................................................... 4 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide utilization review services to clients and do not make coverage determinations. References to standard benefit plan language and coverage determinations do not apply to those clients. Coverage Policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Please note, the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document [Group Service Agreement, Evidence of Coverage, Certificate of Coverage, Summary Plan Description (SPD)
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Metronidazole, Tetracycline Hcl and Famotidine Alone and in Combination
    International Journal of Pharmaceutics 290 (2005) 1–13 Stability of metronidazole, tetracycline HCl and famotidine alone and in combination Yunqi Wua, Reza Fassihib,∗ a Product Development, Scolr Pharma, Inc., Bellevue, Washington, USA b Temple University, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3307 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA Received 25 June 2004; received in revised form 22 October 2004; accepted 22 October 2004 Abstract Metronidazole, tetracycline HCl and famotidine are commonly used for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer. In this paper, stabilities of these drugs and their combinations in solid and liquid states were studied as part of preformulation in the development of a combination drug delivery system. Solubility studies of metronidazole and tetracycline HCl were investigated, which indicated that both metronidazole and tetracycline HCl have high solubilities at and around pH 2.0. Metronidazole is relatively stable with little degradation in liquid phase. Tetracycline HCl in the dry state is stable when stored at room temperature regardless of exposure to light or humidity in the range of 20–65%. Enhanced temperature associated humidity effect was responsible for the instabilities of tetracycline HCl and famotidine to different extents. Elevated temperature accelerated the degradation of all the drugs in liquid phase but light exposure was not a factor for the degradation. The degradation processes of tetracycline HCl and famotidine were highly dependent on the pH of the solution, and relatively stable profiles were achieved at pH 4.0. No potential incompatibility between the drugs under storage conditions was observed in the development of a new multi-drug delivery tablet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bismuth Salts for Gastrointestinal Issues: a Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines DATE
    TITLE: Bismuth Salts for Gastrointestinal Issues: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines DATE: 24 November 2015 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES Oral bismuth formulations have been used effectively for prophylaxis and treatment of both diarrhea and for treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.1,2 Bismuth formulations available without a prescription have been commonly used to treat episodic diarrhea for over a century. Bismuth has also been used to treat ulcers prior to the appreciation of its antimicrobial activity against the then unknown causative micro-organism, H. pylori.1 Episodes of diarrhea are especially common in travelers to resource-poor countries. It is estimated that 30% to 70% of international travelers will develop diarrhea during travels or upon return. Typically diarrhea is self-diagnosed and the causal infectious agent remains unknown. While the condition is frequently self-limiting, treatment can reduce the duration, severity, and inconvenience of diarrhea while travelling. Commonly used treatments include antibiotics, antimotility agents, oral rehydration solutions, and bismuth subsalicylate.2 H. pylori infection is a substantial public health concern as it plays a causative role in the pathogenesis of many gastrointestinal conditions such as gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer.3 Current treatment regimens designed to eradicate infection utilize more than one antibiotic simultaneously in a standard triple therapy (STT) consisting of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), and two antibiotics.
    [Show full text]
  • Furazolidone, Co-Amoxiclav, Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate, and Esomeprazole for Patients Who Failed to Eradicate Helicobacter
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eCommons@AKU eCommons@AKU Department of Medicine Department of Medicine September 2009 Furazolidone, Co-amoxiclav, Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate, and Esomeprazole for patients who failed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori with triple therapy Z Abbas Aga Khan University, [email protected] Javed Yakoob Aga Khan University, [email protected] Shahab Abid Aga Khan University, [email protected] Wasim Jafri Aga Khan University, [email protected] Muhammad Islam Aga Khan University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_med_med Part of the Gastroenterology Commons Recommended Citation Abbas, Z., Yakoob, J., Abid, S., Jafri, W., Islam, M., Azam, Z., Hilal, I. (2009). Furazolidone, Co-amoxiclav, Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate, and Esomeprazole for patients who failed to eradicate Helicobacter pylori with triple therapy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 54(9), 1953-1957. Available at: https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_med_med/154 Authors Z Abbas, Javed Yakoob, Shahab Abid, Wasim Jafri, Muhammad Islam, Zahid Azam, and Imran Hilal This article is available at eCommons@AKU: https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_med_med/154 Dig Dis Sci (2009) 54:1953–1957 DOI 10.1007/s10620-008-0582-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Furazolidone, Co-amoxiclav, Colloidal Bismuth Subcitrate, and Esomeprazole for Patients Who Failed to Eradicate Helicobacter pylori with Triple Therapy Zaigham Abbas Æ Javed Yakoob Æ Shahab Abid Æ Wasim Jafri Æ Muhammad Islam Æ Zahid Azam Æ Imran Hilal Received: 22 July 2008 / Accepted: 13 October 2008 / Published online: 5 December 2008 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract There is increasing evidence of Helicobacter Introduction pylori (H.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Pylori Treatment Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) January 30, 2018
    H. pylori Treatment Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) January 30, 2018 Please Note: This clinical document has been retired. It can be used as a historical reference. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of Magellan Rx Management. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Magellan Rx Management Attention: Legal Department 6950 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be educational in nature and is intended to be used for informational purposes only. Send comments and suggestions to [email protected]. January 2018 Proprietary Information. Restricted Access – Do not disseminate or copy without approval. © 2004-2018 Magellan Rx Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevpac Pylera Omeclamox Talicia March 2020 Annual Review
    Federal Employee Program® 1310 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 202.942.1000 Fax 202.942.1125 5.50.21 Section: Prescription Drugs Effective Date: July 1, 2020 Subsection: Gastrointestinal Agents Original Policy Date: September 8, 2011 Subject: Prevpac Pylera Omeclamox-Pak Page: 1 of 6 Talicia Last Review Date: June 18, 2020 Prevpac Pylera Omeclamox-Pak Talicia Description Omeclamox-Pak (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) Prevpac (lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) Pylera (bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, tetracycline) Talicia (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and rifabutin) Background Prevpac and Omeclamox-Pak are a copackaged product containing a proton pump inhibitor, a macrolide antimicrobial, and a penicillin class antibacterial that, when taken together, is indicated for the eradication of Heliobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease that is active or up to a one year history. Pylera is a copackaged product containing two antimicrobials; metronidazole, tetracycline and bismuth subcitrate potassium. Pylera is also used to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in patients with H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease; Pylera is FDA-approved for use only in combination with omeprazole. Talicia is a three-drug combination of a proton pump inhibitor, a penicillin-class antibacterial, and a rifamycin antibacterial. Eradication of H. pylori has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence (1-4). It is important to treat H. pylori infection because it has been identified as a risk factor in the development of peptic ulcer, duodenal ulcer, atrophic gastritis, gastric cancer, and mucosal- associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, as well as, a possible risk factor for the development idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and anemia (1-4).
    [Show full text]