DOCSLIB.ORG

Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil and Potentiometric Surface of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil and Potentiometric Surface of The Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil and Potentiometric Surface of the Missouri River Alluvial Aquifer at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas August 1992 and January 1993 By Brian P. Kelly and Dale W. Blevins__________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 95-322 Prepared in cooperation with the MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL Rolla, Missouri 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section 1400 Independence Road Box 25286, MS 517 Mail Stop 200 Denver Federal Center Rolla, Missouri 65401 Denver, Colorado 80225 II Geohydrologic Characteristics of the Missouri River Alluvial Aquifer at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas CONTENTS Glossary................................................................................................................~^ V Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Study Area................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Geographic Information System Data Base ................................................................................................................ 2 Land Use.........................................................................._^ 3 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Hydrogeologic Setting........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil................................................................................................................................ 4 Potentiometric Surface.......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Methods of Measurement............................................................................................................................................ 5 Measuring-Point Altitude.................................................................................................................................. 5 River-Stage Measurement................................................................................................................................. 5 Ground-Water Movement............................................................................................................................................ 6 Potentiometric Surface August 1992.............................................................................................................. 7 Potentiometric Surface January 1993............................................................................................................. 8 Summary................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 References Cited.................................................................................................................................................................... 10 PLATES [Plates are in box] 1. Location of water level, lithologic, and depth to bedrock data-collection sites for the Missouri River alluvial aquifer at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas 2. Land use on the Missouri River alluvial valley at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas 3. Vertical hydraulic conductivity of soils in the Missouri River alluvial valley at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas 4. Potentiometric surface of the Missouri River alluvial aquifer at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas August 1992 5. Potentiometric surface of the Missouri River alluvial aquifer at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas January 1993 FIGURES 1. Map showing location of the study area..................................................................................................................... 2 2. Generalized geologic cross section through the Missouri River alluvium near Liberty, Missouri ........................... 4 3. Graph showing altitude of the Missouri River at the U.S. Geological Survey gaging station at the Hannibal Bridge and precipitation at the Kansas City Municipal Airport, Kansas City, Missouri August 1 to August 22,1992.................................................................................................................... 8 4. Graph showing altitude of the Missouri River at the U.S. Geological Survey gaging station at the Hannibal Bridge and precipitation at the Kansas City Municipal Airport, Kansas City, Missouri January 1 to January 22,1993 .................................................................................................................. 9 Contents TABLES 1. Users and sources of drinking water from the Missouri River alluvial aquifer in the Kansas City metropolitan area ................................................................................................................................................... 15 2. Vertical hydraulic conductivity of soils in the Missouri River alluvial valley at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas .............................................................................................................................................. 19 CONVERSION FACTORS AND VERTICAL DATUM Multiply By To obtain millimeter 3.937 inch centimeter 0.3937 inch meter 3.2808 foot kilometer 0.6215 mile square kilometer 0.3861 square mile meter per hour 39.3701 inches per hour meter per day 3.2808 foot per day square meter per day 10.7642 square foot per day cubic meter per day 264.2008 million gallons per day Sea level: In this report, "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929) a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929. IV Geohydrologic Characteristics of the Missouri River Alluvial Aquifer at Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas GLOSSARY Alluvium. The detrital deposits resulting from the actions Potentiometric surface. Surface that represents the static of rivers. These deposits are composed of clay-, silt-, head of water in an aquifer; it is defined by the levels sand-, gravel-, cobble-, and boulder-size particles. to which water will rise in tightly cased wells from a Aquifer. A formation, group of formations, or part of a given point in an aquifer. formation that contains sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells Specific yield. The ratio of the volume of water that an or springs. aquifer material will yield by gravity drainage to the Cone of depression. The depression, approximately coni­ volume of aquifer material. cal in shape, produced in a water table or potentiomet- Storage coefficient. The volume of water an aquifer ric surface by pumping. releases from or takes into storage per unit surface area Confined aquifer. An aquifer bounded above by confin­ of the aquifer per unit change in hydraulic head. In an ing units or an aquifer containing confined water. unconfined aquifer, it is essentially equal to the spe­ Confining unit. A body of material with low vertical cific yield. hydraulic conductivity stratigraphically adjacent to one or more aquifers. Synoptic water-level measurement. The measurement Evapotranspiration. Water discharge to the atmosphere of water levels in wells over a broad area in a defined, by evaporation from water surfaces and moist soil and relatively short time. by plant transpiration. Transmissivity. The volume of water per unit of time that Geographic information system (GIS). A computer data is transmitted through a unit width of an aquifer under base that processes geographic data in digital form and a unit hydraulic gradient. Transmissivity is equal to displays data graphically for efficient data management hydraulic conductivity multiplied by the aquifer sat­ and analysis. urated thickness. Ground water. That part of subsurface water that is in the saturated zone. Unconfined aquifer. An aquifer that has a water table; Hydraulic conductivity. Capacity of material to transmit the saturated zone between the water table and the first water under pressure. It is the volume of water per unit underlying confining unit; synonymous with surficial of time passing through a unit section of area under a aquifer. unit hydraulic gradient at the existing kinematic vis­ Zone of contribution. The area surrounding a pumped cosity. well that encompasses all areas or features that supply Hydraulic gradient. The change in hydraulic head per recharge to the well. unit distance of flow in a given direction; synonymous with potentiometric gradient. [Definitions modified
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydraulic Conductivity and Shear Strength of Dune Sand–Bentonite Mixtures
    Hydraulic Conductivity and Shear Strength of Dune Sand–Bentonite Mixtures M. K. Gueddouda Department of Civil Engineering, University Amar Teledji Laghouat Algeria [email protected] [email protected] Md. Lamara Department of Civil Engineering, University Amar Teledji Laghouat Algeria [email protected] Nabil Aboubaker Department of Civil Engineering, University Aboubaker Belkaid, Tlemcen Algeria [email protected] Said Taibi Laboratoire Ondes et Milieux Complexes, CNRS FRE 3102, Univ. Le Havre, France [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Compacted layers of sand-bentonite mixtures have been proposed and used in a variety of geotechnical structures as engineered barriers for the enhancement of impervious landfill liners, cores of zoned earth dams and radioactive waste repository systems. In the practice we will try to get an economical mixture that satisfies the hydraulic and mechanical requirements. The effects of the bentonite additions are reflected in lower water permeability, and acceptable shear strength. In order to get an adequate dune sand bentonite mixtures, an investigation relative to the hydraulic and mechanical behaviour is carried out in this study for different mixtures. According to the result obtained, the adequate percentage of bentonite should be between 12% and 15 %, which result in a hydraulic conductivity less than 10–6 cm/s, and good shear strength. KEYWORDS: Dune sand, Bentonite, Hydraulic conductivity, shear strength, insulation barriers INTRODUCTION Rapid technological advances and population needs lead to the generation of increasingly hazardous wastes. The society should face two fundamental issues, the environment protection and the pollution risk control.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Conductivity of Composite Soils
    This is a repository copy of Hydraulic conductivity of composite soils. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/119981/ Version: Accepted Version Proceedings Paper: Al-Moadhen, M orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-5724, Clarke, BG orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-9200 and Chen, X orcid.org/0000-0002-2053-2448 (2017) Hydraulic conductivity of composite soils. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (CPEG2). 2nd Symposium on Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (CPEG2), 06-07 Sep 2017, Leeds, UK. This is an author produced version of a paper presented at the 2nd Symposium on Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (CPEG2), Leeds, UK 2017. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics (CPEG2), Leeds, UK 2017 Hydraulic conductivity of composite soils Muataz Al-Moadhen, Barry G.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmissivity, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Storativity of the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in Texas
    Technical Report Transmissivity, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Storativity of the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in Texas by Robert E. Mace Rebecca C. Smyth Liying Xu Jinhuo Liang Robert E. Mace Principal Investigator prepared for Texas Water Development Board under TWDB Contract No. 99-483-279, Part 1 Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713-8924 March 2000 Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 5 HYDROGEOLOGY....................................................................................................................... 5 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 13 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 14 DATA COMPILATION ...................................................................................................... 14 EVALUATION OF HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES FROM THE TEST DATA ................. 19 Estimating Transmissivity from Specific Capacity Data.......................................... 19 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Method 9100: Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Saturated Leachate
    METHOD 9100 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, SATURATED LEACHATE CONDUCTIVITY, AND INTRINSIC PERMEABILITY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope and Application: This section presents methods available to hydrogeologists and and geotechnical engineers for determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity of earth materials and conductivity of soil liners to leachate, as outlined by the Part 264 permitting rules for hazardous-waste disposal facilities. In addition, a general technique to determine intrinsic permeability is provided. A cross reference between the applicable part of the RCRA Guidance Documents and associated Part 264 Standards and these test methods is provided by Table A. 1.1.1 Part 264 Subpart F establishes standards for ground water quality monitoring and environmental performance. To demonstrate compliance with these standards, a permit applicant must have knowledge of certain aspects of the hydrogeology at the disposal facility, such as hydraulic conductivity, in order to determine the compliance point and monitoring well locations and in order to develop remedial action plans when necessary. 1.1.2 In this report, the laboratory and field methods that are considered the most appropriate to meeting the requirements of Part 264 are given in sufficient detail to provide an experienced hydrogeologist or geotechnical engineer with the methodology required to conduct the tests. Additional laboratory and field methods that may be applicable under certain conditions are included by providing references to standard texts and scientific journals. 1.1.3 Included in this report are descriptions of field methods considered appropriate for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity by single well or borehole tests. The determination of hydraulic conductivity by pumping or injection tests is not included because the latter are considered appropriate for well field design purposes but may not be appropriate for economically evaluating hydraulic conductivity for the purposes set forth in Part 264 Subpart F.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivities for a Sand and Gravel Aquifer in Southeastern Massachusetts, Estimated by Three Methods by LINDA P
    Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivities for a Sand and Gravel Aquifer in Southeastern Massachusetts, Estimated by Three Methods By LINDA P. WARREN, PETER E. CHURCH, and MICHAEL TURTORA U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4160 Prepared in cooperation with the MASSACHUSETTS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, RESEARCH AND MATERIALS DIVISION Marlborough, Massachusetts 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Water Resources Division Open-File Reports Section 28 Lord Road, Suite 280 Box 25286, MS 517 Marlborough, MA 01752 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Hydraulic Conductivities Estimated by Three Methods.................................................................................................... 3 PenneameterTest.............................................................^ 3 Grain-Size Analysis with the Hazen Approximation............................................................................................. 8 SlugTest...................................................^
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Horizontal Variability of Hydraulic Conductivity on Slope
    water Article The Influence of Horizontal Variability of Hydraulic Conductivity on Slope Stability under Heavy Rainfall Tongchun Han 1,2,* , Liqiao Liu 1 and Gen Li 1 1 Research Center of Costal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (G.L.) 2 Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2020; Published: 15 September 2020 Abstract: Due to the natural variability of the soil, hydraulic conductivity has significant spatial variability. In the paper, the variability of the hydraulic conductivity is described by assuming that it follows a lognormal distribution. Based on the improved Green–Ampt (GA) model of rainwater infiltration, the analytical expressions of rainwater infiltration into soil with depth and time under heavy rainfall conditions is obtained. The theoretical derivation of rainfall infiltration is verified by numerical simulation, and is used to quantitatively analyze the effect of horizontal variability of the hydraulic conductivity on slope stability. The results show that the variability of the hydraulic conductivity has a significant impact on rainwater infiltration and slope stability. The smaller the coefficient of variation, the more concentrated is the rainwater infiltration at the beginning of rainfall. Accordingly, the wetting front is more obvious, and the safety factor is smaller. At the same time, the higher coefficient of variation has a negative impact on the cumulative infiltration of rainwater. The larger the coefficient of variation, the lower the cumulative rainwater infiltration.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Correlation Between Porosity and Hydraulic Conductivity in Sand-And-Gravel Aquifers at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2005 Negative correlation between porosity and hydraulic conductivity in sand-and-gravel aquifers at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Roger H. Morin Denver Federal Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Morin, Roger H., "Negative correlation between porosity and hydraulic conductivity in sand-and-gravel aquifers at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA" (2005). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 358. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/358 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Hydrology 316 (2006) 43–52 www.elsevier.com/locate/jhydrol Negative correlation between porosity and hydraulic conductivity in sand-and-gravel aquifers at Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Roger H. Morin* United States Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, USA Received 3 March 2004; revised 8 April 2005; accepted 14 April 2005 Abstract Although it may be intuitive to think of the hydraulic conductivity K of unconsolidated, coarse-grained sediments as increasing monotonically with increasing porosity F, studies have documented a negative correlation between these two parameters under certain grain-size distributions and packing arrangements. This is confirmed at two sites on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA, where groundwater investigations were conducted in sand-and-gravel aquifers specifically to examine the interdependency of several aquifer properties using measurements from four geophysical well logs.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Excess Pore Pressure Dissipation Model for Liquefiable Sands
    6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering 1-4 November 2015 Christchurch, New Zealand Empirical Excess Pore Pressure Dissipation Model for Liquefiable Sands S.C. Chian1 ABSTRACT In the early phase of excess pore pressure dissipation, the excess pore pressure in a liquefied homogeneous soil stratum reduces most significantly at the base, leading to a curvature at the lower part of the initial isochrone while the upper half remains fairly unchanged. In the later phase, the curvature leaves the initial isochrone completely and progresses until excess pore pressure is fully dissipated. In this paper, a simplified exponential equation is introduced to capture the excess pore pressure dissipation over time. This equation is applied to several dynamic centrifuge tests and shown to depict a suitable fit to the dissipation time history over a wide range of hydraulic conductivity of sands. Introduction Soil liquefaction has been studied extensively over the past several decades since its field observation following the 1964 Niigata Earthquake. However, it still poses serious threats to infrastructure in earthquake prone areas to date, where liquefiable soil layers are present. This is evident in recent earthquakes such as the Christchurch Earthquake and the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. Numerous researchers have taken notice of the loss of shear strength due to generation of excess pore pressure during earthquake shaking, however not many have investigated the impact of dissipation of excess pore pressure as thoroughly. Severe ground displacement/settlement can occur during the dissipation of excess pore water pressure. This can lead to tilting of buildings, sliding/lowering of dam crest, lateral spreading of bridge abutment wall, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance-Based Hydraulic Conductivity Models for Unbound Granular Materials
    Performance-Based Hydraulic Conductivity Models for Unbound Granular Materials Haithem Soliman, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Civil & Geological Engineering University of Saskatchewan Email: [email protected] Ahmed Shalaby, P.Eng. Professor and Head Department of Civil Engineering University of Manitoba E-mail: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the “Advanced Testing and Modeling of Road and Embankment Materials” Session of the 2016 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Toronto, Ontario. 1 Abstract Specifications for unbound granular materials (UGM) must be based on the function of the unbound layer (drainable layer, high stiffness, or both). Using performance-based specifications that are based on laboratory performance of UGM (resilient modulus, permanent deformation, and permeability) provides durable and longer lasting unbound layers. This paper investigates the effect of fines content variation on the permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of two types of UGM, gravel and 100% crushed limestone. Hydraulic conductivity tests were conducted on compacted gravel UGM with 4.0% fines, 9.0% fines, and 14.5% fines. For 100% crushed limestone, hydraulic conductivity tests were conducted on compacted samples with 4.5% fines, 10.5% fines, and 16.0% fines. For gravel, the hydraulic conductivity decreased by 84% due to increasing fines content from 4.0% to 14.5%. For Limestone, the hydraulic conductivity decreased by 81% due to increasing fines content from 4.5% to 16.0%. For gradations with comparable fines content, limestone material showed higher hydraulic conductivity than that for gravel. The laboratory measured hydraulic conductivity was compared to Level 2 design inputs in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (Pavement ME).
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting of Landslides Using Rainfall Severity and Soil Wetness: a Probabilistic Approach for Darjeeling Himalayas
    water Article Forecasting of Landslides Using Rainfall Severity and Soil Wetness: A Probabilistic Approach for Darjeeling Himalayas Minu Treesa Abraham 1 , Neelima Satyam 1 , Biswajeet Pradhan 1,2,3,* and Abdullah M. Alamri 4 1 Discipline of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452020, India; [email protected] (M.T.A.); [email protected] (N.S.) 2 Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Sydney P.O. Box 123, Australia 3 Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Sejong University, Choongmu-gwan, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea 4 Department of Geology & Geophysics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 February 2020; Accepted: 9 March 2020; Published: 13 March 2020 Abstract: Rainfall induced landslides are creating havoc in hilly areas and have become an important concern for the stakeholders and public. Many approaches have been proposed to derive rainfall thresholds to identify the critical conditions that can initiate landslides. Most of the empirical methods are defined in such a way that it does not depend upon any of the in situ conditions. Soil moisture plays a key role in the initiation of landslides as the pore pressure increase and loss in shear strength of soil result in sliding of soil mass, which in turn are termed as landslides. Hence this study focuses on a Bayesian analysis, to calculate the probability of occurrence of landslides, based on different combinations of severity of rainfall and antecedent soil moisture content.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of a Compacted Sand-Bentonite Mixture Under Constant Volume and Free-Swell Conditions
    Determining the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of a compacted sand-bentonite mixture under constant volume and free-swell conditions Y.J. Cui, A.M. Tang, C. Loiseau, P. Delage Université Paris Est, Ecole des ponts, I. Navier Corresponding author Prof. Yu-Jun Cui ENPC/CERMES 6 et 8 avenue Blaise Pascal, Cité Descartes, Champs-sur-Marne, 77455 MARNE-LA-VALLEE CEDEX 2, France. Tel: 33 1 64 15 35 50 Fax: 33 1 64 15 35 62 E-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract Highly compacted sand-bentonite mixtures are often considered as possible engineered barriers in deep high-level radioactive waste disposals. In-situ, the saturation of these barriers from their initially unsaturated state is a complex hydro-mechanical coupled process in which temperature effects also play a role. The key parameter of this process is the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the barrier. In this paper, isothermal infiltration experiments were conducted to determine the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity according to the instantaneous profile method. To do so, total suction changes were monitored at different locations along the soil specimen by using resistivity relative humidity probes. Three constant volume infiltration tests were conducted showing, unexpectedly, a decrease of the hydraulic conductivity during infiltration. One test performed under free-swell conditions showed the opposite and standard trend. These observations were interpreted in terms of microstructure changes during wetting, both under constant volume and free swell conditions. Key-Words: Compacted sand/bentonite mixture, infiltration, instantaneous profile method, relative humidity, constant volume, free-swell, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity 2 Introduction In radioactive waste disposal at great depth, compacted expansive soils are sometimes considered as possible engineered barrier to be placed between the radioactive waste and the host rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Conductivity and Porosity Heterogeneity Controls on Environmental Performance Metrics: Implications in Probabilistic Risk Analysis
    Advances in Water Resources 127 (2019) 1–12 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Advances in Water Resources journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/advwatres Hydraulic conductivity and porosity heterogeneity controls on environmental performance metrics: Implications in probabilistic risk analysis Arianna Libera a,∗, Christopher V. Henri b, Felipe P.J. de Barros a a Sonny Astani Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA b Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, USA a b s t r a c t Heterogeneities in natural porous formations, mainly manifested through the hydraulic conductivity ( K ) and, to a lesser degree, the porosity ( ), largely control subsurface flow and solute transport. The influence of the heterogeneous structure of K on transport processes has been widely studied, whereas less attention is dedicated to the joint heterogeneity of conductivity and porosity fields. Our study employs Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the coupled effect of − spatial variability on the transport behavior (and uncertainty) of conservative and reactive plumes within a 3D aquifer domain. We explore multiple scenarios, characterized by different levels of heterogeneity of the geological properties, and compare the computational results from the joint − heterogeneous system with the results originating from generally adopted constant conditions. In our study, the spatially variable − fields are positively correlated. We statistically analyze key Environmental Performance Metrics: first arrival times and peak mass fluxes for non-reactive species and increased lifetime cancer risk for reactive chlorinated solvents. The conservative transport simulations show that considering coupled − fields decreases the plume dispersion, increases both the first arrival times of solutes and the peak mass fluxes at the observation planes.
    [Show full text]