DOCSLIB.ORG

WILD FAITH Vs PROPER PRUDENCE the Sacrifice of Isaac in Gen 22

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WILD FAITH Vs PROPER PRUDENCE the Sacrifice of Isaac in Gen 22 WILD FAITH vs PROPER PRUDENCE The Sacrifice of Isaac in Gen 22 What has faith to do with reason? We keep running into biblical characters who do very imprudent things and draw the accolades of our narrator, and even of God. o Noah walked to the lumber yard to get boat parts when the sky was clear with no rain in the forecast – all because of a voice he thought he heard in his head. o Abram quit his job in Haran and he and Sarai moved, without knowing exactly what they were putting next on the family C.V. The voice assured them that things would work out. o This doesn’t even touch stories that lie ahead in the Bible, about fishermen, for example, who leave their steady job on the Sea of Galilee to follow an upstart itinerant teacher. In each of these scenes, prudence would have dictated otherwise. Noah would have looked stupid and lost credibility; Abram and Sarai risked financial collapse and even death in a strange land; and the fisherman had no idea where their next meals would come from. Would you have built the boat, moved across the world, or left your nets because of an unfamiliar voice? And there are more: Shadrach, Meschach, and Abednego stand up when everyone else bows down to worship their ruler, despite the threat of fiery death; Daniel prays when praying is illegal and stares down lions for it; prophets tell hard truths that risk their life and limbs; and a pregnant teenage girl says yes to an angel with an outlandish story of virgin birth. On the other hand, there’s Solomon, whose “a stitch in time saves nine” kind of wisdom puts his picture in the dictionary under prudence. The wisdom tradition gives us people whose common- sense etiquette and rules of conduct guide a good and noble life. The sage tells us, “Let another praise you, and not your own mouth; a stranger, and not your own lips.” (Proverbs 27:2 - ESV) That’s good advice. And “A gossip betrays a confidence, but a trustworthy person keeps a secret.” (Proverbs 11:13 – NIV) Makes sense. These are excellent rules to live by, and in some cases they are difficult to do; but they are hardly risky and it doesn’t take a rush of spiritual adrenaline to carry them off. The prudent path is, in the words of our brother of blessed memory, Eugene Peterson, “a long obedience in the same direction.” The PRUDENCE – PASSION continuum offers a grid for tracking the movements of the faithful in the Bible. Where would you put yourself on it? And what does that have to do with how good a person or Christian you are? THESAURUS.COM certainly has an opinion on this. I defy you to find a word in their list of Genesis Session 4 1 ©Allen Hilton antonyms for prudence that has even a vaguely positive connotation. Antonyms for prudence Look at this list of words and ask yourself whether you would like anyone, ever to describe you that way. “I love carelessness Jenna. She’s careless, ignorant, and indiscrete…” or “Bob’s ignorance such a good guy! He’s so stupid and negligent. And no one indiscretion squanders like Bob squanders.” It’s hard to find an opposite stupidity that has even a slightly positive connotation. thoughtlessness disregard And yet, the Bible has space for a positive opposite. When I inattention look for a proper word to describe the good opposite that neglect biblical people embody, I come up empty. I’ve landed on the negligence word passion, because it captures this biblical wildness of spending characters who override reason in the name of faith. The squandering question is whether passion can go too far. Can fanaticism imprudence turn faithfulness into a damaging, unhealthy thing? We run headlong into this question in Genesis 22, where God commands Abraham to kill his son. Can Obedience Go Too Far?! This tension between prudence and passion comes to an early biblical climax in one of the most difficult passages in all of scripture. In Genesis 22, God commands Abraham to sacrifice the son he has waited years and years to welcome into the world – the child God himself promised. Here’s how the excruciating drama goes: After these things God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” 2 He said, “Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains that I shall show you.” It’s one of the most challenging passages in the Bible. It’s going to take our A game to enter the mind of the Spirit. So, with all humility and some of hope of divine wisdom, let’s read! Surely Abraham should refuse. He has heard (and obeyed) the voice of God before, and God has been faithful thus far, but surely this is a bridge to far. Abraham should chalk this up to static on the divine hotline and take Isaac out for a breakfast falafel instead. But, of course, he does not. Genesis Session 4 2 ©Allen Hilton 3 So Abraham rose early in the morning, saddled his donkey, and took two of his young men with him, and his son Isaac; he cut the wood for the burnt offering, and set out and went to the place in the distance that God had shown him. In language parallel to Abraham’s response to God’s call in Genesis 12.4 (“So Abraham went…”), Isaac’s daddy loads him on a donkey and heads for the altar. It reads like a bad movie, in which one of the characters has been bewitched or programmed to destroy and continues on that course relentlessly. But imagine the thoughts of Abraham on the three-day journey. I picture long silences, much pondering, the occasional pause and look back toward home. But whatever his inner state, Abraham moves on. 4 On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place far away. 5 Then Abraham said to his young men, “Stay here with the donkey; the boy and I will go over there; we will worship, and then we will come back to you.” 6 Abraham took the wood of the burnt offering and laid it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. So the two of them walked on together. 7 Isaac said to his father Abraham, “Father!” And he said, “Here I am, my son.” He said, “The fire and the wood are here, but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?” 8 Abraham said, “God himself will provide the lamb for a burnt offering, my son.” So the two of them walked on together. God commands, Abraham packs supplies and goes, Isaac asks, Abraham persists and a sacrifice scene is set. As you and I read this nightmare in slow motion, we may be tempted to rush into the scene and “rescue” – not only Isaac (from death at the hand of his own father), but also Abraham (from such a mortal stain), and even God (from the blight this command seems to put on the divine character). We search desperately for clues that what we’re reading has a code to it. We see that o Abraham assures curious Isaac, who’s baffled that Dad hasn’t brought along a lamb, “God will provide…”, and we hope that he hopes so. o Then Abraham informs his young men “we will worship, and then we will come back to you”, (22.5) and we clutch to the hope that Abraham knew how this would end from the beginning; But suddenly, against our hopes, Abraham raises his hand, and there’s a knife in it. When they came to the place that God had shown him, Abraham built an altar there and laid the wood in order. He bound his son Isaac, and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. 10 Then Abraham reached out his hand and took the knife to kill his son. Genesis Session 4 3 ©Allen Hilton The God who made humans in the divine image (Gen 1), who molded Adam out of a lump of clay (Gen 2), who called Abram and Sarai away from their homeland and family (Gen 12) in order to bless all the nations of the world – that creating and blessing God here commands one of his favorites to kill his son. The demand seems outlandish and obscene. As one prominent contemporary atheist has put it, A modern moralist cannot help but wonder how a child could ever recover from such a psychological trauma. By the standards of modern morality, this disgraceful story is an example simultaneously of child abuse, bullying in two asymmetrical power relationships, and the first recorded use of the Nuremberg defence: 'I was only obeying orders.' Yet the legend is one of the great foundational myths of all three monotheistic religions.” (Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion) When you first heard the story – maybe as you have heard it now – you may have felt Dawkins’ recoil along with him and asked, “How could the good God make this demand?! And why would the Bible even tell this story?!” We come away thinking that either the Bible or Abraham got something wrong here. Why?! Let’s ask our question directly: Why would God demand this? And why would Abraham obey? And, for that matter, why would the Bible tell the story at all? In Richard Dawkins’ words, why has this story become “one of the great foundational myths of all the monotheistic religions?” Extreme Trust Teambuilding gurus often use gadgets to help increase the bond between employees of a firm, members of a small group, or other collections of people who want to join forces well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence
    The Yale Law Journal Volume 94, Number 7, June 1985 Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence Anthony T. Kronmant INTRODUCTION Six years after Alexander Bickel's death, John Hart Ely described his former teacher and colleague as "probably the most creative constitutional theorist of the past twenty years."" Many today would concur in Ely's judgment.' Indeed, among his academic peers, Bickel is widely -regarded with a measure of respect that borders on reverence. There is, however, something puzzling about Bickel's reputation, for despite the high regard in which his work is held, Bickel has few contemporary followers.' There is, today, no Bickelian school of constitutional theory, no group of scholars working to elaborate Bickel's main ideas or even to defend them, no con- tinuing and connected body of legal writing in the intellectual tradition to which Bickel claimed allegiance. In fact, just the opposite is true. In the decade since his death, constitutional theory has turned away from the ideas that Bickel championed, moving in directions he would, I believe, f Professor of Law, Yale Law School. 1. J. ELY, DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST 71 (1980). 2. See B. SCHMIDT, HISTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES: THE JUDICI- ARY AND RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT 1910-21 (pt. 2) 722 (1984) (describing Bickel as "the most brilliant and influential constitutional scholar of the generation that came of age during the era of the Warren Court"); Ackerman, The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution, 93 YALE L.J. 1013, 1014 (Bickel "revered as spokesman-in-chief for a school of thought that emphasizes the importance of judicial restraint").
    [Show full text]
  • Nominalism, Romanticism, Negative Dialectics by Megan A. O'connor A
    Nominalism, Romanticism, Negative Dialectics By Megan A. O’Connor A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Steven Goldsmith, Chair Professor Kevis Goodman Professor Celeste Langan Professor Martin Jay Spring 2019 Nominalism, Romanticism, Negative Dialectics © 2019 by Megan A. O’Connor Abstract Nominalism, Romanticism, Negative Dialectics by Megan A. O’Connor Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Professor Steven Goldsmith, Chair This dissertation recovers a neglected dialectical tradition within British empiricism and its Romantic afterlife. Beginning with John Locke, I demonstrate how a dialectical tradition developed as a self-critical response to the political, philosophical, and aesthetic problem of nominalism, which holds that universals do not exist and that everything is particular. As contemporaries like Dugald Stewart and S.T. Coleridge observed, British empiricists had revived the medieval nominalist-realist debates and sided with the nominalists. I show that nominalism – what Karl Marx called the “first form” of materialism – was taken up and critiqued by Romantic poets as an impediment to the task of representing abstract social and historical forces. Romantic poets as distinct as Coleridge, William Blake, and Charlotte Smith suggest that, in questioning the validity of social abstractions, the nominalist bent of empiricism tended to disable critical interrogations of larger social structures that otherwise remain inaccessible to the senses. In diagnosing the abstracting force of historical conditions like the commodification of the literary marketplace, however, the texts I examine also respond by affirming particularity.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtues and Vices to Luke E
    CATHOLIC CHRISTIANITY THE LUKE E. HART SERIES How Catholics Live Section 4: Virtues and Vices To Luke E. Hart, exemplary evangelizer and Supreme Knight from 1953-64, the Knights of Columbus dedicates this Series with affection and gratitude. The Knights of Columbus presents The Luke E. Hart Series Basic Elements of the Catholic Faith VIRTUES AND VICES PART THREE• SECTION FOUR OF CATHOLIC CHRISTIANITY What does a Catholic believe? How does a Catholic worship? How does a Catholic live? Based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church by Peter Kreeft General Editor Father John A. Farren, O.P. Catholic Information Service Knights of Columbus Supreme Council Nihil obstat: Reverend Alfred McBride, O.Praem. Imprimatur: Bernard Cardinal Law December 19, 2000 The Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur are official declarations that a book or pamphlet is free of doctrinal or moral error. No implication is contained therein that those who have granted the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur agree with the contents, opinions or statements expressed. Copyright © 2001-2021 by Knights of Columbus Supreme Council All rights reserved. English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church for the United States of America copyright ©1994, United States Catholic Conference, Inc. – Libreria Editrice Vaticana. English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church: Modifications from the Editio Typica copyright © 1997, United States Catholic Conference, Inc. – Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Scripture quotations contained herein are adapted from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1946, 1952, 1971, and the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989, by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America, and are used by permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato: the Virtues of Philosophical Leader
    Center for Open Access in Science ▪ https://www.centerprode.com/ojsp.html Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2018, 2(1), 1-8. ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 ▪ https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0201.01001k _________________________________________________________________________ Plato: The Virtues of Philosophical Leader Ioanna-Soultana Kotsori University of Peloponnese, Kalamata Faculty of Humanities and Cultural Studies Received 22 February 2018 ▪ Revised 25 May 2018 ▪ Accepted 11 June 2018 Abstract The entrance into the reflection of the present work is made with the philosophical necessity of the leader in society, the leader with the particular characteristics of love and wisdom, from which his personality must possess so that by art he can compose opposing situations and move society towards the unity and bliss of citizens. A gentle royal nature (genotype), which blends with the excellent treatment of morality, body and spirit, will create the ideal model leader (phenotype). Thus, noble nature and royal law will give the state the excellent leader. Even if the forms and the conditions that determine them change, the one that remains stable and permanent is the Platonic ethos in art and the science of politics and administration in general. The salvation from corruption is from childhood the cultivation of man by treating at the same time the moral of the soul, the beauty of the body and the wisdom of the spirit. Keywords: philosophical king, education, wisdom, ethos, leader, excellent state, virtues. 1. Introduction Plato’s works demonstrate that he cared for man and society, trying to radically improve morality. Plato’s character was not such as to pursue leadership positions to meet his personal needs and shows his responsibility to the leader’s heavy role.
    [Show full text]
  • On Religious Toleration: Prudence and Charity in Augustine, Aquinas
    ON RELIGIOUS TOLERATION: PRUDENCE AND CHARITY IN AUGUSTINE, AQUINAS, AND TOCQUEVILLE By MARY C. IMPARATO A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Political Science Written under the direction of P. Dennis Bathory And approved by _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION On Religious Toleration: Prudence and Charity in Augustine, Aquinas, and Tocqueville By MARY C. IMPARATO Dissertation Director: P. Dennis Bathory This work seeks to explore the concept of religious toleration as it has been conceived by key thinkers at important junctures in the history of the West in the hopes of identifying some of the animating principles at work in societies confronted with religious difference and dissent. One can observe that, at a time when the political influence of the Catholic Church was ascendant and then in an era of Church hegemony, St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas respectively, faced with religious dissent, argue for toleration in some cases and coercion in others. While, from a contemporary liberal standpoint, one may be tempted to judge their positions to be opportunistic, harsh, or authoritarian, if we read them in the context of their social realities and operative values, we can better understand their stances as emanating ultimately from prudence (that virtue integrating truth and practice) and charity (the love of God and neighbor). With the shattering of Christian unity and the decoupling of throne and altar that occurs in the early modern period, the context for religious toleration is radically altered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cardinal and Theological Virtues
    LESSON 5 The Cardinal and Theological Virtues BACKGROUND READING We don’t often reflect on the staying power Human or Cardinal Virtues that habits have in our lives. Ancient wisdom The four cardinal virtues are human virtues that tells us that habits become nature. We are what govern our moral choices. They are acquired repeatedly do. If we do something over and over by human effort and perfected by grace. The again, eventually we will do that thing without four cardinal virtues are: prudence, justice, thinking. For example, if a person has chewed temperance, and fortitude. The word cardinal her nails all of her life, then chewing nails comes from a Latin word that means “hinge” becomes an unconscious habit that is difficult or “pivot.” All the other virtues are connected to break. Perhaps harder to cultivate are the to, or hinge upon, the cardinal virtues. Without good habits in our lives. If we regularly take time the cardinal virtues, we are not able to live the to exercise, to say no to extra desserts, to get other virtues. up early to pray, to think affirming thoughts of Prudence “disposes practical reason to others, these too can become habits. discern our true good in every circumstance The Catechism of the Catholic Church and to choose the right means of achieving it” defines virtue as “an habitual and firm (CCC 1806). We must recall that our true good disposition to do the good. It allows the person is always that which will lead us to Heaven, so not only to perform good acts, but also to that perhaps another way of saying this is that give the best of himself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtues of “Prudence” and “Sociability” in Eʋe Folk Proverbs
    Chapter 3 The Virtues of “Prudence” and “Sociability” in Eʋe Folk Proverbs 3.1 Introduction to “Prudence” and “Sociability” Chapter 2 presented two of the four major values or virtues, Diligence and Humility, which are highly cherished by the Eʋe peoples and that are given expression in Eʋe folk proverbs. In Chapter 3 we present the other two values or virtues, Prudence and Sociability. These two virtues are also central to Eʋe life and morality and are part of what this book considers as the African tree of life on to which ‘shoots’ from the biblical tree of life, Proverbs can be ‘grafted’ to ensure a better understanding of the book of Proverbs in the African Eʋe cultural context. In order to elucidate the virtue of prudence, we will examine briefly what is meant by ‘prudence’ in some other cultural contexts and how this meaning reflects on its use in the African Ghanaian Eʋe cultural context. In the Greek moral tradition, phronesis, which is regularly rendered in English as ‘prudence’, receives its classical analysis from Aristotle, who regards ‘prudence’ as one of the four cardinal virtues in addition to justice, courage and temperance. Aristotle defines phronesis as “a truth-attaining rational quality, concerned with action in relation to things that are good and bad for human beings.”1 This definition of phronesis—prudence relates it to moral virtues that are either good or bad. In line with Aristotle’s definition, Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker have defined “prudence” as “moral Wisdom resulting in morally correct choices and actions.”2 They regard “prudence,” primarily phro- nesis, as “practical moral intelligence” “related to other moral values and ingrained dispositions to act rightly” in accordance with “developed practice.”3 1 Aristotle XIX The Nicomachean Ethics: With an English Translation by Harris Rackham (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtue Ethics and Tort Law
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2000 Prudence, Benevolence, and Negligence: Virtue Ethics and Tort Law Heidi Li Feldman Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/78 74 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1431-1466 (2000) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Legal History Commons, and the Torts Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications January 2010 Prudence, Benevolence, and Negligence: Virtue Ethics and Tort Law 74 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1431-1466 (2000) Heidi Li Feldman Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/78/ Posted with permission of the author PRUDENCE, BENEVOLENCE, AND NEGLIGENCE: VIRTUE ETHICS AND TORT LAW HEIDI LI FELDMAN* INTRODUCTION Tort law assesses negligence according to the conduct of a reasonable person of ordinary prudence who acts with due care for the safety of others.! This standard assigns three traits to the person whose conduct sets the bar for measuring negligence: reasonableness, ordinary prudence, and due care for the safety of others. Yet contemporary tort scholars have almost exclusively examined only one of these attributes, reasonableness, and have wholly neglected to carefully examine the other elements key to the negligence standard: prudence and due care for the safety of others. It is mistaken to reduce negligence to reasonableness or to try to understand the sense of reasonableness contemplated by the negligence standard without reference to the virtues of prudence and benevolence.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition Person, Nature, & Human Flourishing Aquinas College, Nashville, Tennessee March 9, 2020
    From The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition Person, Nature, & Human Flourishing Aquinas College, Nashville, Tennessee March 9, 2020 NOTE: To check the footnotes, please refer to a printed copy of the Catechism or an on-line version. THE VIRTUES 1803 "Whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is gracious, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things."62 A virtue is an habitual and firm disposition to do the good. It allows the person not only to perform good acts, but to give the best of himself. The virtuous person tends toward the good with all his sensory and spiritual powers; he pursues the good and chooses it in concrete actions. The goal of a virtuous life is to become like God.63 I. THE HUMAN VIRTUES 1804 Human virtues are firm attitudes, stable dispositions, habitual perfections of intellect and will that govern our actions, order our passions, and guide our conduct according to reason and faith. They make possible ease, self-mastery, and joy in leading a morally good life. The virtuous man is he who freely practices the good. The moral virtues are acquired by human effort. They are the fruit and seed of morally good acts; they dispose all the powers of the human being for communion with divine love. The cardinal virtues 1805 Four virtues play a pivotal role and accordingly are called "cardinal"; all the others are grouped around them. They are: prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does the Happy Life Require? Augustine on What the Summum Bonum Includes 1. Introduction
    What Does the Happy Life Require? Augustine on What the Summum Bonum Includes Caleb Cohoe, forthcoming in Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 1. Introduction Many critics of religion insist that believing in a future life makes us less able to value our present activities and distracts us from accomplishing good in this world.1 Augustine is a frequent target, given his insistence that this life is a vale of tears, where we must wait in hope for a better life, while only loving things insofar as they relate to God. Martha Nussbaum insists that “Augustinian love is committed to denying the importance of worldly losses and injustices.”2 She claims that an orientation towards God and towards a future life leads one to neglect the importance of justice and charity in this life. “Death is irrelevant, real suffering in this world is irrelevant, all that is relevant is coming into God’s presence.”3 Instead of looking to the next life, we should be “directing compassion altogether toward the theater of history and not at all toward the shadowy and uncertain realm that may or may not lie outside it.”4 Augustine’s focus on connection to God leaves him without a strong foundation for caring “when people are hungry, when they mourn, when they are persecuted.”5 In this paper, I show that Nussbaum has things backwards. It is while Augustine is trying to achieve happiness in this life that he denies “the importance of worldly losses and injustices,” treats suffering as “irrelevant,” and focuses on cultivating his own divine contemplation, neglecting the material world.
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTION 49 the Integral Parts of Prudence Next We Have to Consider
    QUESTION 49 The Integral Parts of Prudence Next we have to consider each of the quasi-integral parts of prudence. And on this topic we will inquire into these eight parts: (1) memory; (2) understanding (or intelligence); (3) docility; (4) shrewdness; (5) reasoning; (6) foresight (or providence); (7) circumspection; and (8) caution. Article 1 Is memory a part of prudence? It seems that memory is not a part of prudence: Objection 1: As the Philosopher shows, memory exists in the sentient part of the soul. But as is clear from Ethics 6, prudence exists in the reasoning part. Therefore, memory is not a part of prudence. Objection 2: Prudence is acquired through, and progresses by means of, experience. But memory exists in us by nature. Therefore, memory is not a part of prudence. Objection 3: Memory is about past things. But as Ethics 6 explains, prudence has to do with future actions about which there is deliberation,. Therefore, memory is not a part of prudence. But contrary to this: In Rhetorica 2 Tully posits memory among the parts of prudence. I respond: As has been explained (q. 47, a. 5), prudence has to do with contingent actions (est circa contingentia operabilia). Now in these matters a man cannot be guided by what is true absolutely speaking and with necessity, but is instead guided by what occurs in most cases (in pluribus). For as Ethics 6 explains, the principles must be proportionate to the conclusions, and from principles of a certain sort one reaches conclusions of that sort. Now it is through experience that one must come to examine what is true for the most part, and this is why in Ethics 2 the Philosopher says that intellectual virtue derives its generation and increase from time and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Confessions, by Augustine
    1 AUGUSTINE: CONFESSIONS Newly translated and edited by ALBERT C. OUTLER, Ph.D., D.D. Updated by Ted Hildebrandt, 2010 Gordon College, Wenham, MA Professor of Theology Perkins School of Theology Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas First published MCMLV; Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 55-5021 Printed in the United States of America Creator(s): Augustine, Saint, Bishop of Hippo (345-430) Outler, Albert C. (Translator and Editor) Print Basis: Philadelphia: Westminster Press [1955] (Library of Christian Classics, v. 7) Rights: Public Domain vid. www.ccel.org 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 11 I. The Retractations, II, 6 (A.D. 427) . 22 Book One . 24 Chapter 1: . 24 Chapter II: . 25 Chapter III: . 25 Chapter IV: . 26 Chapter V: . 27 Chapter VI: . 28 Chapter VII: . 31 Chapter VIII: . 33 Chapter IX: . 34 Chapter X: . 36 Chapter XI: . 37 Chapter XII: . 39 Chapter XIII: . 39 Chapter XIV: . 41 Chapter XV: . 42 Chapter XVI: . 42 Chapter XVII: . 44 Chapter XVIII: . 45 Chapter XIX: . 47 Notes for Book I: . 48 Book Two . .. 50 Chapter 1: . 50 Chapter II: . 50 Chapter III: . 52 Chapter IV: . 55 Chapter V: . 56 Chapter VI: . 57 Chapter VII: . 59 Chapter VIII: . 60 Chapter IX: . .. 61 3 Chapter X: . 62 Notes for Book II: . 63 Book Three . .. 64 Chapter 1: . 64 Chapter II: . 65 Chapter III: . 67 Chapter IV: . 68 Chapter V: . 69 Chapter VI: . 70 Chapter VII: . 72 Chapter VIII: . 74 Chapter IX: . .. 76 Chapter X: . 77 Chapter XI: . 78 Chapter XII: . 80 Notes for Book III: . 81 Book Four . 83 Chapter 1: . 83 Chapter II: . 84 Chapter III: .
    [Show full text]