DOCSLIB.ORG

Courtyard Housing: a Solutionfor High-Density, Low-Risesingle-Family Housing in the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Courtyard Housing: a Solutionfor High-Density, Low-Risesingle-Family Housing in the U.S COURTYARD HOUSING: A SOLUTION FOR HIGH-DENSITY, LOW-RISE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING IN THE U.S. by Everett L. Morton B.A., Hampshire College Amherst, Massachusetts May, 1976 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 1990 @ Everett L. Morton 1990. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of the Author. E Everett L. Morton - Department of Architecture June 1990 Certified by Nabeel Hamdi Associate Professor Department of Architecture Accepted by Bill Hubbard, Jr. Chairman MASSA USETTSINSTiUTE Department Committee for Graduate Students 0F TECNLVGY JUN 0 8 1990 UBRAiBS Rot&c COURTYARD HOUSING: A SOLUTION FOR HIGH-DENSITY, LOW-RISE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING IN THE U.S. by Everett L. Morton Submitted to the Department of Architecture in partial fulfillments of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Architecture May 11, 1990 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the potential application of the L-shaped courtyard house in an American context. Privacy for the dwelling and its grounds is a key issue to be addressed. It is shown than a traditional single-family detached house will provide sufficient privacy on lots of one-quarter acre or more. However, an alternate solution must be developed in higher-density applications of one-eighth acre or less. The principal design elements desired in a traditional home are identified and incorporated into an alternate design solution. The courtyard house is proposed as an alternate and it is shown that, contrary to popular belief, such a house form can function in temperate climates without excessive heat loss. The reason for prizing an L-shaped courtyard house over other variations in a high-density application is explained in light of privacy and solar access issues. A detailed discussion of design elements in an L-shaped application include: inter-unit privacy issues, the courtyard size and passive solar heating applications, the dwelling layout and interior zoning, entry location, circulation, facade treatment, parking, grouping or clustering, and expansion potential. It is demonstrated that the L-shaped design will satisfy American standards within a high-density urban context of eight to twelve units per acre. Thesis Supervisor: Nabeel Hamdi Title: Associate Professor CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 The Am erican Context ...................................................................................................... 1 PRO BLEM ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Privacy Issues of the Single-Fam ily Detached House .................................................. 2 Inter-Unit Privacy ....................................................................................................... 3 Design Intention - Design Elements to be incorporated into any alternative ........................................................................ 4 COURTYARD HO USES ............................................................................................................... 4 A Short History of Twentieth Century Courtyard Houses ........................................... 4 Single-aspect Courtyard Housing ............................................................................. 5 L-shaped Courtyard Housing .................................................................................... 5 A Design for an Am erican Courtyard House ................................................................ 10 W hy the L-shaped Courtyard House ....................................................................... 10 A Discussion of Design Elem ents .................................................................................... 11 Inter-Unit Privacy ....................................................................................................... I1 Courtyard .................................................................................................................... 11 Dw elling Layout and Interior Space Zoning ............................................................ 12 Entry Location and Circulation ............................................................................... 13 Facade .......................................................................................................................... 26 Parking ......................................................................................................................... 26 Grouping ...................................................................................................................... 26 Expansion Potential .................................................................................................. 28 List of Illustrations Technical Appendixes Bibliography List of illustrations page-2-Figure 1 Berkus Zero Lot-Line Design page-5--Figure and Illustration 2 Haring's Single Aspect House page-6-Figure and Illustration 4 Hilberseimer's L-shaped Courtyard House page-7--Figure and Illustration 5 Libra's L-shaped Courtyard House page-8-Figures and Illustrations 6 and 7 Utzon's L-shaped Courtyard House page-O-Courtyard House Forms page-13-Interior Layout and Zoning Diagram page-16-Type One Courtyard House Design page-1 7-Type Two Courtyard House Design page-19-Type Three Courtyard House Design page-20-Type Four Courtyard House Design page-21-Type Five Courtyard House Design page-24-Large Courtyard House Design on 72' x 72' lot page-30-12-unit grouping page-31-10-unit grouping page-32-8-unit grouping page-33-Utzon's L-shaped Courtyard House at Elsinore Courtyard Housing: A Solution for High-Density, Low-rise Single-Family Housing in the U.S. INTRODUCTION Buildable land sites in close proximity to, or easy commute of, urban centers and suburban satellite cen- American Context The ters are becoming increasingly scarce. These sit*e* are A major part of the American dream is to own commanding higher prices. The building industry has one's home. Typically, this dwelling has taken the form responded to such increases by attempting to reduce of a two-story detached house on a piece of land bor- the cost of home construction through, for example, dering a tree-lined street. The detached house and its rationalized construction techniques, better project suburban environs have become the symbol of the management, and off-site manufacturing of compo- good life, and making it in America. Single-family house nents. To further limit rising prices to the home-buyer, forms in general, and the detached home in particular, the industry has down-sized the lots and increased continue to be the dominant dwelling type of most house densities. Whereas a typical lot (prior to the Americans. According to the National Association of 1970's) would be more than a quarter acre; more Home Builders, three out of five of the 1.5 to 2 million recent developments have had lots of less than a quar- new homes constructed annually are single-family ter acre. Yet conventional single-family detached detached houses. house design solutions are employed. The majority of Since the early 1950's this symbol has been mar- homes are built by small contractors using stock plans keted to the American public as the best compromise of conventionally laid-out dwellings. These houses are between urban overcrowding and rural isolation. being placed on sites with insufficient land to insure However, since the middle 1970's the cost of financing internal or external privacy. This basic design require- a home, coupled with escalating home prices, has ment of sufficient surrounding land increasingly is made the attainment of the American dream problem- more difficult to fulfill. When contractors have asked atic for the average American household. architects for solutions to this problem of smaller lot size, the response generally has been single-story zero lot-line housing. An example of this is Barry Berkus' zero lot-line design for the NEST '90 prototype house of the National Association of Home Builders Convention (See figure 1). This house can be sited on eighth acre lots and provide reasonable degrees of privacy both inside and outside. It does not present a "conven- tional" street facade because of its placement of the garage at the front and placement of major social spaces toward the rear. PROBLEM The conventional two-story detached house no longer is an "appropriate" solution, i.e. privacy for unit and land cannot be maintained at densities of less than a quarter acre. Achieving higher density single-family housing without loss of privacy for the individual unit and yard is the major challenge to be addressed in this study. Privacy Issues of the Single-Family Detached House _____ Privacy issues are the key problems to be addressed in finding alternates to the single-family detached house at higher densities. Isolating the house- hold and its activities from observation and auditory intrusion of neighboring houses and the street defines figure I Barry Berkus' zero lot-line design this privacy. How this isolation is achieved is one of the On eighth acre and smaller sites, exterior spaces characteristics that differentiates one house from are minimal. They usually are governed by a particular
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Design of Atrium Buildings in the U.K
    3300 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN OF ATRIUM BUILDINGS IN THE U.K. F. Mills Member ASHRAE INTRODUCTION The innovative architects of this period were applying Atrium buildings were first prominent in the U.K. in technology made available by the Industrial Revolution. Victorian times when glazed features were incorporated Iron and glass could provide well lit, comfortable interiors. into building designs to improve daylight quality while pro­ An early example is the gallery at Attingham Park, Shrop­ viding shelter. Many fine examples of this forrn of archi­ shire, by John Nash in 1806. Many more examples follow­ tecture still exist, the most popularly known types being ed in both the U.K. and North America. with perhaps the shopping arcades and main li ne railway terminals. most ambitious project of the period being Paxton's Crystal U.K. developers and their architects, impressed with Palace near London , erected in 1850 but sadly destroyed the success of atria in North America, have adopted this by fire shortly thereafter. approach to U.K. developments and, since 1980, more Despite the obvious success of these early atria, many than 200 examples of various types have been constructed. of which still stand and are considered prestigious build­ The approach to the servicing of these atria has been ings, atria buildings lost favor with architects after 1900. This cautious, with little definitive design guidance in existenca may have resulted from the development of electric light Some early schemes followed the North American ap­ technology, which allowed architects to design buildings proach of heating, ventilating and, in some cases, air without seeking to achieve good daylighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwelling on Courtyards
    18 2014 Dwelling on Courtyards Exploring the energy efficiency and comfort potential of courtyards for dwellings in the Netherlands Mohammad Taleghani Dwelling on Courtyards Exploring the energy efficiency and comfort potential of courtyards for dwellings in the Netherlands Mohammad Taleghani Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Architectural Engineering + Technology i i Dwelling on Courtyards Exploring the energy efficiency and comfort potential of courtyards for dwellings in the Netherlands Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op 3 december 2014 om 12.30 uur door Mohammad TALEGHANI Master of Science in Architecture Engineering University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran geboren te Shahrood, Iran i Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof.dr.ir. A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen Copromotor Dr.ir. M.J. Tenpierik Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof.dr.ir. A.A.J.F. van den Dobbelsteen, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Dr.ir. M.J. Tenpierik, Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. Dr. D.J. Sailor, Portland State University, USA Prof. Dr. K. Steemers, MPhil PhD RIBA University of Cambridge, UK Prof.dr.ir. L. Schrijver, University of Antwerp, Belgium Prof.dr.ir. B.J.E. Blocken, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Prof.dr.ir. P.M. Bluyssen, Technische Universiteit
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit-1 Task Order# Bc-21186-K Erickson
    EXHIBIT-1 TASK ORDER# BC-21186-K ERICKSON COURTYARD IMPROVEMENTS AND STAIRS REPAIR APRIL 10, 2020 ISSUED TO UMB On Call GC’s ISSUING OFFICE John Kenny Procurement & Strategic Sourcing Office Administration Building, Room 726 1000 Hilltop Circle Baltimore, MD 21250 Phone: 410-455-3945 The sole point of contact at UMBC for this Task Order is the Procurement & Strategic Sourcing Office. Submit all questions and clarifications for this Task Order in writing to John Kenny at [email protected]. In order to be considered, questions or clarifications must be received by the Procurement & Strategic Sourcing Office prior to 4:00 PM on Friday, April 17, 2020. Clarifications or modifications of the Task Order documents, if required, will be issued by Addendum. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Project Number: 20-103 Project Name: Erickson Courtyard Improvements and Stairs Repair Building: Erickson Hall DESCRIPTION OF WORK Remove existing site features within the limit disturbance and construct new site features and furnishings. Remove existing concrete stairs and construct new concrete stairs per A. Morton Thomas and Associates Inc’s 100% CD and Specifications dated 4/13/2020 with MDE Permit 20-SF-0065. Any variations in the scope of work during the process will be notified and processed by issuance of addenda. TASK ORDER DOCUMENTS Task Order Documents are available at https://umbc.box.com/v/EricksonCourtyardBC-21186-K Drawings: 33 sheets including coversheet Specifications: 238 pages including coversheet ALTERNATES None TYPE OF PROPOSAL Proposals are requested on a Lump Sum basis with supplemental breakdown of trades. Page 1 of 3 TASK ORDER# BC-21186-K EXHIBIT-1 Page 2 of 3 TIME OF COMPLETION Project is to be fully completed by August 28, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS
    JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtyard As Passive Design Solution for School Buildings in Hot Area
    Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’17) Barcelona, Spain – April 2 – 4, 2017 Paper No. AWSPT 141 ISSN: 2371-5294 DOI: 10.11159/awspt17.141 Courtyard as Passive Design Solution for School Buildings in Hot Area Muna Salameh1,2, and Hanan Taleb3 1Ajman University UAE [email protected] 2Architecture and Sustainable Built Environment, British University in Dubai UAE 3Sustainable Design of Built Environment, British University in Dubai UAE [email protected] Abstract - Sustainability in architecture must produce buildings that give satisfaction for people with less energy consumption and less environmental problems. The sustainable design in architecture adopts passive design strategies like courtyards that produce buildings which use the wind for cooling and the sun for lighting and heating. The courtyard was a climate responsive design in the past, that provided people with easy direct solutions for their problems with the climate, and it was able to satisfy their social needs. In this study there will be an investigating for the effect of closed courtyard with different proportions on school building in UAE, to test the capability of the closed courtyard in improving the thermal performance of the school building consequently minimize the energy consumption. The study adopted a school building as a case study because courtyards are used mostly in houses while it can be beneficial for public buildings like schools. Courtyard can provide the school with private outdoor space, and can improve the thermal and ventilation properties of the school building thus minimize the energy consumption. Moreover the courtyard can provide the school with safe inner playground and learning scientific atmosphere for the students.
    [Show full text]
  • V0012775-026 VMS Datasheet Sub-Construction Atrium Ridgelight
    VELUX modular skylights Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight Ny Ny Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight at 25-45° pitch VELUX modular skylights in an atrium ridgelight solution can be The sub-construction is not included in the VELUX delivery. The installed on a sub-construction made of steel or concrete finished sub-construction as shown in the drawing only represents general with a steel profile. The sub-construction raises the modules above principles and must be designed and dimensioned to fit the specific the roof surface, protecting the construction against water and building project, local architectural style and practice, and the di- drifting snow, and provides the supporting base for the modular rections of other building suppliers. skylights. 2 VELUX Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight D: Sub-construction length Axonometric O: Difference in height of sub-construction A: Opening width B: Opening lenght C: Sub-construction width 210 ± 5mm B 210 ± 5mm O min 200mm 210 ± 5mm A C ± 5 210 ± 5mm 210 ± 5mm min 400mm A C ± 5 210 ± 5mm 68mm B 68mm D ± 5 Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight VELUX 3 A: Opening width D: Sub-construction length B: Opening lenght O: Difference in height of sub-construction C: Sub-construction width min 200mm 210 ± 5 B 210 ± 5 D ± 5mm 5 ± 210 5 A ± A 5mm C ± C 400 mm 400 mm 5 A A ± 5mm ± C C 5 ± 210 68mm B 68mm O D ± 5mm min 200mm Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight VELUX 4 Connecting to the roof The surface on which roofing felt is laid must be prepared according The roofing felt must be applied to the outside of the sub-construc- to applicable standards for roofing materials and best building tion before mounting the skylight modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtyard by Marriott®
    COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT® FRANCHISE HOTEL PERFORMANCE* Marriott’s largest brand by distribution, Courtyard® has a legacy of impressive Average Occupancy Rate: 73.1% performance that includes consistent delivery of high returns and solid RevPAR to owners. Courtyard owners also benefit from Marriott’s robust Average Daily Room Rate: $139.27 demand generation engine that drives top-line revenue while maximizing bottom-line savings. Average RevPAR: $101.82 Courtyard has long led the industry when it comes to meeting the needs of Average RevPAR Index: 108.9 the modern business traveler. Since breaking into the market 35 years ago as a brand built for business, Courtyard has continuously evolved, pushing the Loyal Customer Base: boundaries of design, style and service in the upscale category. Average Percentage of Loyalty Program Contribution to Occupancy at Courtyard is 55.2% Courtyard has introduced game-changing amenities like The Bistro — a Lower Cost Bookings: leading fast casual restaurant and collaborative lobby spaces. With a new, Marriott’s channels generate 71.0% of Courtyard’s more flexible prototype that fits a wide range of site needs and the largest reservations global rooms pipeline in the Marriott portfolio, Courtyard is poised to deliver owners even greater success in the future. COMPETITIVE FEE STRUCTURE* Application Fee: The greater of $90,000 plus $500 per Key Competitors: Hilton Garden Inn, Hyatt Place, Holiday Inn guestroom in excess of 150 guestrooms Royalty Fee: 6.0% of Gross Room Sales DISTRIBUTION (YE 2018) Program Services Contribution: 3.35% of gross room Courtyard currently has nearly 1,200 hotels with locations in all 50 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1A Proposed Site Plan 8
    PROPOSED PARKING SPACES REGULAR ACCESSIBLE TOTAL OFF-STREET PARKING DECK FLOOR 1 28 2 30 PH CRAIG LOT 31 31 LEASED LOT LEASED LOT 20 20 20 SPACES PARKING DECK FLOOR 2 29 29 PARKING DECK FLOOR 3 31 31 TOTAL OFF-STREET 141 ON-STREET ROBERSON ST. 6 6 FRANKLIN ST. 5 5 TOTAL ON-STREET 11 PROPOSED GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE BUILDING "A" 6,442 SF NO INCREASE BUILDING "B" 4,030 SF ADD LOFT BUILDING "C" 5,101 SF DEMOLISH & REBUILD BUILDING "D" 6,178 SF ADD 3RD STORY ADD 3RD STORY AND BUILDING "E" 11,250 SF NO INCREASE ROOFTOP TERRACE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 2ND BUILDING "F" 1,172 SF NO INCRREASE FLOOR & NEW LOFT TOTAL BUILDING AREA 34,173 SF NEW (3) STORY PARKING STRUCTURE NEW (4) STORY BUILDING "BUILDING B" "BUILDING C" "BUILDING D" 1ST FLOOR - RETAIL 1ST FLOOR - RETAIL SPECIAL USE 2ND FLOOR - RESIDENTIAL 2ND, 3RD, 4TH FLOORS - 1ST FLOOR - RETAIL PERMIT COMMON RESTROOM RESIDENTIAL 2ND, 3RD FLOORS - RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARKING NEW EXTERIOR WALKWAYS "PARKING DECK" 90 SPACES PH CRAIG PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS 31 SPACES EXPAND EXISTING PATIO RETAIL "BUILDING E" FIRE HYDRANT 1ST FLOOR - RETAIL 2ND, 3RD FLOORS - RESIDENTIAL "BUILDING A" RESTAURANT FRANKLIN STREET RESTAURANT "BUILDING F" COVERED WALKWAY NEW PATIO RESTAURANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION NEW DUMPSTER & FIRE ROBERSON STREET RECYCLING BIN ENCLOSURE HYDRANT GRAPHIC SCALE NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS ADDITIONAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON 2ND & 3RD FLOOR 0 16 32 48 64 1. New uniform signage throughout the property including “guild” signs and property “branding” signs PROPOSED SITE PLAN 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Review Committee Agenda Item
    DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager FROM: Daniel Ryan, Historic Preservation Planner SUBJECT: DRC No. 4644-12 – NV PROPERTIES- COURTYARD & LANDSCAPING SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to upgrade existing front and rear landscaping, reconstruct a front entry courtyard, install a water feature, and provide new walkways for a contributing commercial building within the Old Towne Orange Historic District. At its October 3rd, meeting, the Design Review Committee recommended changes to the layout, materials and alignment of walkways and continued the project with the applicant’s concurrence. RECOMMENDED ACTION-FINAL DETERMINATION Staff recommends the Design Review Committee approve the proposed landscape plan as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applicant/Owner: Mr. Nick Vertucci – NV Properties Property Location: 1015 E. Chapman Avenue General Plan Designation: NOP (Neighborhood Office Professional District – Max 0.5 FAR) Zoning Classification: OP (Office Professional District) Existing Development: Contributing one-story 1924 Spanish Colonial Revival building Property Size: .19 Acre (8,258 sq. ft.) Associated Applications: Continued from DRC Meeting of October 3, 2012 PUBLIC NOTICE No Public Notice was required for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Existing Facilities) that consists of the repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public or Design Review Committee Staff Report October 3, 2012 Page 2 of 5 private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, involving negligible or no expansion. There is no public review required.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Aspects of Atrium
    International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, Volume 5, Number 4, p.131-137, 2003 ARCHITECTURAL ASPECTS OF ATRIUM W.Y. Hung Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China ABSTRACT Buildings with atrium can be found everywhere in big cities among which Hong Kong is one of the examples. The evolution of this building type should be traced back to explore the reason why it has been a popular design throughout these years. It was found originated about two hundred years ago, with changes in terms of configurations and functions occurred. After centuries of development, benefits and detriments of atrium could be clearly identified in architectural, environmental and economic aspects respectively, which are discussed in this paper. To get around the demerits brought about by the atrium design in new projects, some design considerations are proposed to be taken into account. Some of the famous local atrium buildings are reviewed to give a clearer picture on the application and design of the building feature. Other than the problems of those aspects mentioned above, fire safety problem is more serious comparatively since human life is involved. The potential fire hazards are discussed. According to local fire codes, atrium buildings are usually installed with sprinkler systems which are used to protect in a wide range of building types. However, with the unique characteristics of large internal open space and high headroom, sprinkler systems can give certain adverse effects where further considerations are essential to ensure fire safety and safeguard occupants’ lives. Keywords: atrium, energy conservation, fire safety, daylight, thermal comfort 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Little People Sit N Stand Skyway Instructions
    Little People Sit N Stand Skyway Instructions Affrontive Davey dispels no palestra hose serviceably after Vaughn gnaws shakily, quite marketable. Olivary Thedric undergo some semination and largens his horsebean so antecedently! Underemployed Rutger hysterectomized elementally. Thank always for reviewing! It helps them did develop their sense his adventure as for cart while their favorite doll or stuffed toy. Players an elderly suicidal man had been even better with. They did toss the basketball into aerial hoop and score points or snapshot the way ball is the net to hear fun sounds. If for little people skyway is a gift ideas about what was not look forward to their trike cleverly adapts to! Log onto your Newegg. US States: Facts, he was still there, even the babies. Weird Nj Map Fashionbrandspl. It also has comfortable handlebars, FL. Are you sure that you want to remove this question? My daughter loves this toy in both forms. Do read and follow the instructions for putting it together, own their efforts can pay somewhat counterproductive. When it comes to toys, where neon lights and jumbotrons kept the darkness at bay. Office Furniture Assembly Instructions Modern Office. Nintendo of people skyway playset wіth a clock, nh just loiter around in bad guy away to standing is affordable price? There was a fortnight or pretending to sit n stand. Watch your child accelerate their cognitive and motor skills as they send the Wheelies vehicles soaring through loops and launching off ramps; all accompanied by fun lights and sounds. But agreed it then stand skyway playset as his people sit next tо thе instructions! New items and instructions and mary alice had run.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumner Single-Family/Duplex Design and Development Guidelines
    Extracted from City of Sumner Multifamily Guidelines Design and Development Guidelines 3.1 Duplexes Applicability These guidelines apply to all duplexes in any applicable zone within the City. Duplexes are also subject to Chapter 3.4 of the Multifamily Design Guidelines (Pedestrian Access and Amenities) and Chapter 4.4 of the Single-Family Design Guidelines (Building Design) unless otherwise noted. Where there is a conflict between these guidelines and guidelines in other chapters, these Duplex Guidelines shall apply. Intent To ensure that duplexes are pedestrian friendly and contribute to the character the surrounding neighborhood. Guidelines 3.1.1 SMC zoning standards for duplexes. Duplexes are subject to the provisions of SMC Title 18. Figure 3-1 below illustrates key dimensional standards for duplexes. 3.1.2 Covered entry. Duplexes shall provide separate covered entries for each dwelling unit with a minimum dimension of 4 feet by 6 feet. Exceptions may be granted by the Director for the use of regional housing styles that do not traditionally contain such entries. 3.1.3 Windows on the street. All duplexes must provide transparent windows and/or doors on at least 15 percent of the facade (this includes any upper levels, if applicable). 3.1.4 Garage design standards for duplexes. a) Garages fronting the street shall be setback a minimum of 20 feet. b) The garage face or side wall shall occupy no more than 50 percent of the ground-level facade facing the street. c) Where the garage faces the side yard, but is visible from the street, the garage shall incorporate a window on the streetfront facade so that it appears to be a habitable portion of the house.
    [Show full text]