DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Monitoring Report Building Climate Resilience Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Monitoring Report Building Climate Resilience Of Environmental Monitoring Report Project Number: 44214-024 August 2019 Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. This Environmental Compliance Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Department of Forests and Soil Conservation Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (BCRWME) Project (ADB Loan/Grant No.: GO357/0358-NEP) Semiannual Environemntal Monitoring Report of BCRWME Sub-projects (January to June 2019) Preparaed By BCRWME Project Project Management Unit Dadeldhura July, 2019 ABBREVIATION ADB : Asian Development Bank BCRWME : Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco- Regions BOQ : Bills of Quantity CDG : Community Development Group CFUG : Community Forest User Group CO : Community Organizer CPC : Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) CS : Construction Supervisor DDR : Due Diligence Reports DFO : Divisional Forest Office DFSC : Department of the Forests and Soil Conservation DSCO : District Soil Conservation Office DSCWM : Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management EARF : Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA : Environmental Impact Assessment EMR : Environmental Monitoring Report EO : Environment Officer FAC : Feasibility Approval Committee FTT : Field Technical Team GRC : Grievance Redress Committee GoN : Government of Nepal Ha : Hectare IEE : Initial Environmental Examination MoFE : Ministry of Forests and Environment NCB : National Competitive Bidding NDF : Nordic Development Fund NES : National Environmental Specialist O& M : Operation and Maintenance PAM : Project Administrative Mannual PIU : Project Implementation Unit PMIC : Project Management Implementation Consultant PMU : Project Management Unit REA : Rapid Environmental Assessment RVT : Reservoir Tank SES : Senior Environment Specialist SEMR : Semiannual Environment Monitoring Report SP : Sub-project SPPR : Sub-project Preparation Report SWMC : Sub-watershed Management Committee VDC : Village Development Committee WMA : Watershed Management Associate WME : Watershed Management Engineer i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco- Regions (BCRWME) Project being implemented by the Department of the Forests and Soil Conservation (DFSC) with grant assistance from ADB, Nordic Development Fund and Government of Nepal intends to improve access to and reliability of water supplies to communities living in watershed vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The project has considered environment component to address environmental issues of sub-projects (SPs) implementation. The project has an environmental assessment review framework (EARF) that specifies sub-project (SP) selection procedures, SP’s environment categorization, environment assessment procedure, community consultation, grievance redress mechanism and institutional arrangement for environment monitoring and reporting mechanism. There are 108 SPPRs (Batch I-8, Batch II-20, batch II-40 and Batch IV-40) and all of them are category C projects. The environmental safeguard requirements of GoN and ADB are satisfactorily addressed in SPs planning and implementation stages. The project has adopted procedural requirements such as environmental screening, SPs categorization, Due Diligence Report inclusion, community consultation, voluntary land donation documents during sub-project preparation report (SPPR) preparation and approval process. No violations of local traditions and culture, no resettlement of indigenous people, worker’s safety, avoidance of under aged workers, community consultations, slope stabilization through engineering and bioengineering measures, minimizing trees cutting (if unavoidable), quarry site management, spoil management are considered during implementation of SPs. The project has the provision of intermittent inputs of senior environment specialist (SES) and designated soil conservation officer as an environment officer. Environment compliance status of 20 SPs has been reported in January-June, 2019. Inclusion of DDRs in 108 SPs, 515 numbers of voluntary land donation documents and more than 1077 ward level consultations were conducted during planning stage. Quarry site management, burrow pit management, spoils management, soil erosion and landslide control are adopted in SPs implementation. No tree cut issue is reported in 20 SPs of Dadeldhura, Baitadi and Bajhang. These 20 SPs have planted 8031 winter plantation, 69478 forestry species, 83910 fodder trees and 24506 fruit trees. It is reported that 30959 winter trees, 70665 fruit trees, 134537 fodder trees, 122610 forestry species were planted in 68 SPs till June, 2019. Cultivation of 1096503 numbers of grasses is reported. 237 numbers of source upstream location covering 22033 ha of catchment area are managed in 20 SPs of Dadeldhura, Baitadi and Bajhang. 553 numbers (n=20 SPs) of catchments are restored. No involuntary land acquisition, resettlement issues, social conflicts, child labour were noticed due to SP implementation. No grievance is received till date; however project is under the process of formation of grievance redress committee. The SPs have great environment benefits in terms of catchment management, ground water recharge, surface water management, water source protection, land stabilization and erosion control mechanism. The project is now planning to prepare environment safeguard guidelines and orient the project staffs. The project needs to provide a monitoring and reporting training to the project teams so that the project could receive quality environmental report regularly. ii Table of Contents Abbreviation ................................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... ii 1. Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Environment Safeguard in The BCRWME Project .................................................................................. 2 3. Construction Approach ................................................................................................................................. 2 4. Overall Environmental Safeguard Status .................................................................................................... 3 5. Compliance Status with Environmental Covenants ................................................................................ 3 6. Institutional Arrangement.............................................................................................................................. 4 6.1 Environment Safeguard Compliance Mechanism .............................................................................. 4 6.2 Environmental Monitoring Mechanism in District ............................................................................ 4 7. Compliance with Environmental Safeguard Measures ............................................................................ 5 7.1 During Planning and Approval Phase ................................................................................................... 5 7.1.1 Environment Screening and SP categorization, environment assessment ........................ 6 7.1.2 Project Procedural Requirement ............................................................................................... 6 7.1.3 Rapid Environment Assessment and Due Diligence Report ............................................... 6 7.1.4 Environmental officers .................................................................................................................. 6 7.1.5 Grievance redress mechanism and Environment safeguard desk ...................................... 6 7.1.6 Community consultation and downstream users’ consent ................................................. 7 7.1.7 Land Donation ................................................................................................................................ 7 7.1.8 Environment benefits by SPs ....................................................................................................... 7 7.2 During Implementation Stage ................................................................................................................ 7 7.2.1 Quarry Site and Burrow Pit Management................................................................................ 7 7.2.2 Soil erosion, landslide control .................................................................................................... 8 7.2.3 Excess Spoil and excavated top soil management .................................................................. 8 7.2.4 Tree cutting and plantation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Security Bulletin 29
    Nepal Food Security Bulletin Issue 29, October 2010 The focus of this edition is on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain region Situation summary Figure 1. Percentage of population food insecure* 26% This Food Security Bulletin covers the period July-September and is focused on the Mid and Far Western Hill and Mountain (MFWHM) 24% region (typically the most food insecure region of the country). 22% July – August is an agricultural lean period in Nepal and typically a season of increased food insecurity. In addition, flooding and 20% landslides caused by monsoon regularly block transportation routes and result in localised crop losses. 18 % During the 2010 monsoon 1,600 families were reportedly 16 % displaced due to flooding, the Karnali Highway and other trade 14 % routes were blocked by landslides and significant crop losses were Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct -Dec Jan-M ar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep reported in Kanchanpur, Dadeldhura, western Surkhet and south- 08 09 09 09 09 10 10 10 eastern Udayapur. NeKSAP District Food Security Networks in MFWHM districts Rural Nepal Mid-Far-Western Hills&Mountains identified 163 VDCs in 12 districts that are highly food insecure. Forty-four percent of the population in Humla and Bajura are reportedly facing a high level of food insecurity. Other districts with households that are facing a high level of food insecurity are Mugu, Kalikot, Rukum, Surkhet, Achham, Doti, Bajhang, Baitadi, Dadeldhura and Darchula. These households have both very limited food stocks and limited financial resources to purchase food. Most households are coping by reducing consumption, borrowing money or food and selling assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security Bulletin - 21
    Food Security Bulletin - 21 United Nations World Food Programme FS Bulletin, November 2008 Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System Issue 21 Highlights Over the period July to September 2008, the number of people highly and severely food insecure increased by about 50% compared to the previous quarter due to severe flooding in the East and Western Terai districts, roads obstruction because of incessant rainfall and landslides, rise in food prices and decreased production of maize and other local crops. The food security situation in the flood affected districts of Eastern and Western Terai remains precarious, requiring close monitoring, while in the majority of other districts the food security situation is likely to improve in November-December due to harvesting of the paddy crop. Decreased maize and paddy production in some districts may indicate a deteriorating food insecurity situation from January onwards. this period. However, there is an could be achieved through the provision Overview expectation of deteriorating food security of return packages consisting of food Mid and Far-Western Nepal from January onwards as in most of the and other essentials as well as A considerable improvement in food Hill and Mountain districts excessive agriculture support to restore people’s security was observed in some Hill rainfall, floods, landslides, strong wind, livelihoods. districts such as Jajarkot, Bajura, and pest diseases have badly affected In the Western Terai, a recent rapid Dailekh, Rukum, Baitadi, and Darchula. maize production and consequently assessment conducted by WFP in These districts were severely or highly reduced food stocks much below what is November, revealed that the food food insecure during April - July 2008 normally expected during this time of the security situation is still critical in because of heavy loss in winter crops, year.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 4.06 MB
    Environmental Compliance Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report Project Number: 44214-024 Grant Number: 0357-NEP July 2020 Nepal: Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions Project Prepared by the Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental Compliance Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Government of Nepal Department of Forests and Soil Conservation Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco-Regions (BCRWME) Project (ADB Loan/Grant No.: GO357/0358-NEP) Semiannual Environemntal Monitoring Report of BCRWME Sub-projects (January to June 2020) Preparaed By BCRWME Project Project Management Unit Dadeldhura July, 2020 ABBREVIATION ADB : Asian Development Bank BCRWME : Building Climate Resilience of Watersheds in Mountain Eco- Regions BOQ : Bills of Quantity CDG : Community Development Group CFUG : Community Forest User Group CO : Community Organizer CPC : Consultation, Participation and Communications (Plan) CS : Construction Supervisor DDR : Due Diligence
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Kailash Sacred Landscape
    Kailash Sacred Landscape Conservation Initiative Feasability Assessment Report - Nepal Central Department of Botany Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal June 2010 Contributors, Advisors, Consultants Core group contributors • Chaudhary, Ram P., Professor, Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University; National Coordinator, KSLCI-Nepal • Shrestha, Krishna K., Head, Central Department of Botany • Jha, Pramod K., Professor, Central Department of Botany • Bhatta, Kuber P., Consultant, Kailash Sacred Landscape Project, Nepal Contributors • Acharya, M., Department of Forest, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (MFSC) • Bajracharya, B., International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) • Basnet, G., Independent Consultant, Environmental Anthropologist • Basnet, T., Tribhuvan University • Belbase, N., Legal expert • Bhatta, S., Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation • Bhusal, Y. R. Secretary, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Das, A. N., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Ghimire, S. K., Tribhuvan University • Joshi, S. P., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Khanal, S., Independent Contributor • Maharjan, R., Department of Forest • Paudel, K. C., Department of Plant Resources • Rajbhandari, K.R., Expert, Plant Biodiversity • Rimal, S., Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation • Sah, R.N., Department of Forest • Sharma, K., Department of Hydrology • Shrestha, S. M., Department of Forest • Siwakoti, M., Tribhuvan University • Upadhyaya, M.P., National Agricultural Research Council
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Development Organizations in Agriculture Sector of Dadeldhura District: an Economic Analysis
    International Journal of Agricultural Science Research Vol. 2(5), pp. 163-176, May 2013 Available online at http://academeresearchjournals.org/journal/ijasr ISSN 2327-3321 ©2013 Academe Research Journals Full Length Research Paper Performance of development organizations in agriculture sector of Dadeldhura District: An economic analysis G. P. Bohara*, J. P. Dutta, D. Dhakal and J. L. Yadav Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal Accepted 17 May, 2013 Transformation of traditional and subsistence agriculture into commercial and market oriented production system needs efficient transfer of technology to the farmers. Efforts to bridge the gap between research and farmer’s field have been lacking in Nepal and performance of the organizations providing extension services to the farmers is below par, the reason behind this state of affairs is still to be studied. In order to assess the performance of development organizations, this study selected 105 farmers from Dadeldhura district using stratified random sampling technique and both primary and secondary data regarding the activities of those organizations were collected. The development organizations were found to be concentrated in urban areas with technician to population ratio and extension coverage of 1:2353 and 22.7%, respectively. Agriculture sector occupied only 4.01% of the district budget. Most of the organizations had similar type of activities mainly related to technology, extension and support. Regression analysis showed that organizations had significant contribution in annual income of farmers, hence it played a significant role in development of agriculture in the district and respondents were satisfied by their works in general with few disappointments at some instants.
    [Show full text]
  • Khaptad Chhededaha Rural Municipality Invitation for Bids
    Khaptad Chhededaha Rural Municipality Office Of The Municipal Executive Dogadi, Bajura Far-Western Province, Nepal Invitation for Bids IFB No: 1/075/076 Date of publication: 2075/12/29 Method of Procurement: NCB, Eligibility Procedure 1. Khaptad Chhetedaha Rural Municipality Office invites sealed Bids from all eligible Nepalese Bidders for Construction & Maintenance of Following Roads with construction detail as follows. (Name and Identification no of Contract are as follows.) Estimated Bid Cost Contract Bid S. Amount (NRS.) Security of Bid Identification Description of Work Security N. [Excluding VAT Validity Document No: amount & Contingencies] Period (NRs.) KCRM/NCB/ Chhededaha-Thamlekh 1 42,97,362.11 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/01/2075-076 Sadak Stharunnati KCRM/NCB/ Dungrikhola-Baddaune 2 43,06,503.61 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/02/2075-076 Sadak Stharunnati KCRM/NCB/ Adharikhola-Chhadipatal 3 43,05,041.53 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/03/2075-076 Sadak Stharunnati KCRM/NCB/ Atichaur-Chhededaha 4. 43,08,802.32 1,25,000.00 3,000.00 W/R/04/2075-076 Stharunnati Road Maurekhola- KCRM/NCB/ 5. Jayabageshwori-Raan- 87,94,058.32 2,55,000.00 last date of bid submission 3,000.00 W/R/05/2075-076 up to 120 days from the Validity Singada Sadak Stharunnati. 2. Eligible Bidders may obtain further information and inspect the Bidding Documents at the Khaptad-Chhededaha Rural Municipality office Bajura, Email Address: [email protected], Contact No: 096-690801 or may visit PPMO website www.bolpatra.gov.np.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1 : - Srms Print Run Quantity and Detail Specifications for Early Grade Reading Program 2019 ( Cohort 1&2 : 16 Districts)
    Annex 1 : - SRMs print run quantity and detail specifications for Early Grade Reading Program 2019 ( Cohort 1&2 : 16 Districts) Number Number Number Titles Titles Titles Total numbers Cover Inner for for for of print of print of print # of SN Book Title of Print run Book Size Inner Paper Print Print grade grade grade run for run for run for Inner Pg (G1, G2 , G3) (Color) (Color) 1 2 3 G1 G2 G3 1 अनारकल�को अꅍतरकथा x - - 15,775 15,775 24 17.5x24 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 2 अनौठो फल x x - 16,000 15,775 31,775 28 17.5x24 cms 80 gms Maplitho 4X0 1x1 3 अमु쥍य उपहार x - - 15,775 15,775 40 17.5x24 cms 80 gms Maplitho 4X0 1x1 4 अत� र बु饍�ध x - 16,000 - 16,000 36 21x27 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 5 अ쥍छ�को औषधी x - - 15,775 15,775 36 17.5x24 cms 80 gms Maplitho 4X0 1x1 6 असी �दनमा �व�व भ्रमण x - - 15,775 15,775 32 17.5x24 cms 80 gms Maplitho 4X0 1x1 7 आउ गन� १ २ ३ x 16,000 - - 16,000 20 17.5x24 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 8 आज मैले के के जान� x x 16,000 16,000 - 32,000 16 17.5x24 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 9 आ굍नो घर राम्रो घर x 16,000 - - 16,000 20 21x27 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 10 आमा खुसी हुनुभयो x x 16,000 16,000 - 32,000 20 21x27 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 11 उप配यका x - - 15,775 15,775 20 14.8x21 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4X4 12 ऋतु गीत x x 16,000 16,000 - 32,000 16 17.5x24 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 13 क का �क क� x 16,000 - - 16,000 16 14.8x21 cms 130 gms Art Paper 4X0 4x4 14 क दे�ख � स륍म x 16,000 - - 16,000 20 17.5x24 cms 130 gms Art Paper 2X0 2x2 15 कता�तर छौ ? x 16,000 - - 16,000 20 17.5x24 cms 130 gms Art Paper 2X0 2x2
    [Show full text]
  • Field and Model Evaluation of Maize-Legume Intercropping System
    Field evaluation of maize-legume intercropping systems in the mid-hills of Nepal Name student(s): Hsiang-En Wei Date: 9/5/2016 Farming Systems Ecology Group Droevendaalsesteeg 1 – 6708 PB Wageningen - The Netherlands Field evaluation of maize-legume intercropping system in the mid-hills of Nepal Name student(s): Hsiang-En Wei Registration number student: 900511936090 Credits: 36 ECTs Code number: FSE-80436 Name course: MSc Thesis Farming Systems Ecology Supervisor(s): Maria Victoria Alomia Hinojosa, Jeroen Groot Professor/Examiner: Egbert Lantinga i Preface This study is part of master of plant science and under the supervision of farming system ecology group in Wageningen University. It is the second year research following the master’s thesis of Arun Thapa in 2014. A field experiment was designed and conducted in the mid-hills of Nepal in order to improve the maize-based cropping system which was the majority in local. Hope the results can be useful to the agricultural development associations and scientific communities who would like to make progress for the agricultural production in Nepal. It is my first time to conduct an experiment and present it with report on academic scale. Since the development of proposal and literature research, I faced plenty of difficulties especially in writing introduction and defining research questions. Thanks to the suggestions and work of Arun, his study highly inspired me and saved my time. The life in Nepal was another adventure and challenging, because I had to schedule the weekly measurement together with adjusting my living habit. Without any transportation means and Nepalese speaking, I really thanks to the great help of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltzt Ul/Alsf Uxgtf -K|Ltzt 88]Nw'/F Cd/U9l Gu/Kflnsf
    1 2 lhNnfx?sf] ul/aLsf] b/, ul/aLsf] ljifdtf / ul/aLsf] uxgtf @)^* lhNnf uf=lj=;=sf gfd ul/aLsf b/ ul/aLsf ljifdtf ul/aLsf uxgtf -k|ltzt_ -k|ltzt_ -k|ltzt_ 88]Nw'/f cd/u9L gu/kflnsf 39.24(9.12) 10.97(3.54) 4.28(1.66) 88]Nw'/f d0fLn]v 53.36(10.66) 15.99(4.85) 6.51(2.46) 88]Nw'/f sf]6]nL 39.78(10.24) 10.6(3.78) 4(1.71) 88]Nw'/f a]nfk'/ 59.24(10.33) 17.86(4.94) 7.24(2.51) 88]Nw'/f gjb'uf{ 42.35(9.63) 11.88(3.75) 4.63(1.77) 88]Nw'/f di6df08f 36.34(9.51) 9.44(3.4) 3.49(1.51) 88]Nw'/f u0f]zk'/, s}nkfndf08f 41.51(9.83) 11.15(3.7) 4.22(1.69) 88]Nw'/f c;Lu|fd 34.64(9.45) 8.98(3.27) 3.31(1.43) 88]Nw'/f ufª]v]t 44.74(11.29) 11.59(4.19) 4.23(1.87) 88]Nw'/f hf]ua'9f, cflntfn 45.37(10.28) 11.97(3.96) 4.42(1.8) 88]Nw'/f lzif{ 42.43(10.14) 11.34(3.92) 4.24(1.81) 88]Nw'/f ?kfn 51.71(10.21) 14.97(4.49) 5.91(2.21) 88]Nw'/f efu]Zj/ 41.16(10.61) 10.6(3.9) 3.86(1.75) 88]Nw'/f b]jnlbJok'/ 50.22(10.55) 14.39(4.51) 5.66(2.19) 88]Nw'/f lrk'/ 33.47(10.2) 8.14(3.37) 2.86(1.44) 88]Nw'/f chod]? 38.68(9.25) 10.38(3.36) 3.93(1.52) 88]Nw'/f eb|k'/ 29.93(8.3) 7.05(2.54) 2.43(1.04) 88]Nw'/f ;d}hL 22.43(8.14) 4.87(2.28) 1.59(0.89) gf]6 M sf]i7s -_ leq /x]sf] c+sn] ;DalGwt ;"rssf] e|dfz+ -k|ltzt_ nfO{ hgfpF5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (Muan) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN)
    Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (MuAN) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden European Sverige Union "This document has been financed by the Swedish "This publication was produced with the financial support of International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of does not necessarily share the views expressed in this MuAN, NARMIN, ADCCN and UCLG and do not necessarily material. Responsibility for its content rests entirely with the reflect the views of the European Union'; author." Publication Date June 2020 Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal (MuAN) National Association of Rural Municipality in Nepal (NARMIN) Association of District Coordination Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden Sverige European Union Expert Services Dr. Dileep K. Adhikary Editing service for the publication was contributed by; Mr Kalanidhi Devkota, Executive Director, MuAN Mr Bimal Pokheral, Executive Director, NARMIN Mr Krishna Chandra Neupane, Executive Secretary General, ADCCN Layout Designed and Supported by Edgardo Bilsky, UCLG world Dinesh Shrestha, IT Officer, ADCCN Table of Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Forewords .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]