Evaluation of Butanone, Carbon Dioxide, and I-Octen-3-Ol As Attractants for Mosquitoes Associated with North Central Florida Bay and Cypress Swamps

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Butanone, Carbon Dioxide, and I-Octen-3-Ol As Attractants for Mosquitoes Associated with North Central Florida Bay and Cypress Swamps Journal of the Amzican Mosquito Control Association, 14(3):289--297, 1998 Copyright @ 1998 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. EVALUATION OF BUTANONE, CARBON DIOXIDE, AND I-OCTEN-3-OL AS ATTRACTANTS FOR MOSQUITOES ASSOCIATED WITH NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA BAY AND CYPRESS SWAMPS DANIEL L. KLINE' AND MICHAEL O. MANN, ABSTRACT, Field studies were conducted to determine the responses of mosquitoes found in north central Florida bay and cypress swamps to carbon dioxide (COr), light, butanone, and l-octen-3-ol (octenol), alone and COr in combination with each of the others. The response of these mosquito species to 5 CO, release rates (2, 20, 100, 200, and 2,000 mVmin) of CO, was also determined. The use of CO, resulted in a response in all the species studied; the pattern of response to increasing CO, levels varied from species to species. In general, collection size increased as CO, release rate increased; however, 5 species (Aedes dupreei, Anopheles perplexens, Culiseta melanura, Culex erraticus and Mansonia titillans) deviated from this pattern. Collection sizi of Ae. dupreei, Cs. melanura, and Cx. erraticus decreased at the 2,000 mVmin release rate. Collection size of An. perplexens and Ma. titillans remained constant at each CO, level to which these species responded. In the CO, and light studies, the general pattern for collection size was: CO, + light > CO, alone > tigtrt alone. The combination CO2 + octenol (2.2 mglh) resulted in a synergistic response (i.e., greater than the com-bined response obtained by COr and octenol alone) for all species except Cs. melnnura, Culix nigripalpus, and Culex restuans. Only 2 species (Aedes atlanticus and Aedes carutdensis) responded to octenol in reiatively large numbers (i.e., >5Vo response to octenol alone of that obtained by using CO, alone at the 200 mVmin release rate). Octenol at the release rate tested repelled Cs. melnnura. The butanone + CO, bait combination increased the responses compared to CO, alone of Aedes infirmatus, Culex salinarius, Coquillettidia perturbans, and Psorophoriferox, but decreased the response of Cs, melanura, KEY WORDS Surveillance, baited traps, olfaction, behavior, ecology, mosquitoes, control INTRODUCTION of incorporating attractants into a control program for these mosquito species. In an effort to find alternative control methods to ground and aerial applications of chemical insecti- cides for mosquito control, severalhost emanations MATERIALS AND METHODS (carbon dioxide [COr], l-octen-3-ol [octenol], and butanone) have been evaluated against mosquitoes Study sites associated with a variety of habitats including salt In 1991, most of the trials were conducted in or marshes, mangrove swamps, phosphate mining pits, around a predominantly red maple (Acer rubrutn rice fields, and livestock holding areas.Mosquitoes an0 sweet bay (Magrclia virginiana L.) swamp associatedwith these habitats greatly f-.) varied in their located in Union County, in north Florida (6.4 hn responsesto different release rates and combina- east of Lake Butler and 2.3 km north of Florida tions of these athactants(Kline 1994). highway SRl00 on Florida highway SR237). This Responsesof mosquitoes associated with bay site has had confirmed horse cases of EEE within and cypress swamps to these compounds have not the past decade (unpubtshed data). A variety of been reported. These mosquitoes are important in domesticated animals are kept at this site, including the epidemiology of eastern equine encephalitis cows, horses,goats, and chickens. (EEE) in north central Florida (Choate 1989. Mann In 1992 and 1993, the studies were conducted at 1993). Alternative control methods are needed for a site located in Alachua County (3.2 km NNW of these species becauseduring past the 2 decadesres- the intersection of U.S. highway 441 and Florida idential, housing developments have increasingly highway SR121 near the northwesternboundarv of encroached upon these wetland habitats. In many Gainesville, FL). Pond cypress (Taxodiurn osi"n- locations where thesehabitats occur, either no mos- dens Brongniart) is the predominant tree species, quito control program exists, or ifone does, current but red maple, swamp tupelo (Nyssa sylvatiia var. control methods of spraying with chemical insec- biflora [Walter] Sargent),and red bay (persea bor- ticides are ineffective due to the physical layout of bonia lL.l Sprengel) are also abundant. No domes- the housing development.This paper reportsthe re- ticated animals were kept at this site. sults of our initial efforts to evaluate the potential Traps I United _ States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Agricultural and One Model 512, Communicable Disease Center Veterinary Entomology, PO Box 14565, Gainesville, FL (CDC)type, 6-V, battery-poweredtrap (John Hock 32604. Co., Gainesville, FL) was suspendedfrom a , metal NDVECC Detachment, 1050 NE Most Mark Streel pole ca. 1.5 m above ground level at each trap site. Suite 2lO, Poulsbo, WA 98370. Each trap was equipped with an attractant tesicom- Srprul,rsrn1998 EvAr-uafloN oF ArrRAcrANTs 293 Table 2. Mean (SE) response of the 4 most commonly collected mosquito species in Model 512 Communicable Disease Center (CDC)-type traps baited with carbon dioxide (COr), light, or CO, + light.' Bait Species co, CO, + light Light 't9.83 Aedes canadensis canadenus 40.50(8.38I (23.84)^ 3.83(1.011 0.0001 Anopheles crucians 318.83(144.30X 40r.67(r4r.r5)" 42.83(12.16)b 0.0001 Culex salinarius 24.17(8.O7)b 41.00(8.4sx 3.33(0.84). 0.0001 Culiseta melanura 21.50(3.96)b 40.67 (10.74)^ 16.67(5.80)b 0.005 'n : 6 trap-nights. Mems in the same row followed by the same letter tre not significantly different; Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsh multiple range test (SAS Institute, Inc., Cry, NC, 1985) applied to ranked data. OnIy Aedes canadensis (Theobald), Anopheles expected result suggests that surveys whose pri- crucians Wied., Culex salinarius Coq., and Cs. me- mary target is Cs. melanura covld be performed lanura were collected in sufficient numbers for sta- more quickly and cheaply with CDC light traps tistical analyses. Results of general linear model than with Cor-baited unlit traps, with little or no (GLM) and means comparisons analyses (means, decrease in sensitivity, and possibly with an in- standard errors, and signiflcant differences at each creasein specificity. treatment level) are shown for these species in Ta- ble 2. Although all 4 species followed the gener- Response to various CO, release rates alized response pattern, for Ae. canadensis and,Cx. salirwrius all treatments were highly significantly During 4 replicates (10O trap-nights) 13,001 different (P < 0.m01); for An. crucians the CO, * specimens(22 speciesin 8 genera)were collected. light and the CO, alone collections were not sig- Responsesof all species are shown in Table 3. nificantly different from each other, but they were Means, standard emors, and significant differences significantly different than the light alone collec- are shown in Table 4 for the 12 species that were tions (P < 0.0001). well represented.Both the number of mosquitoes For Cs. melanura, the CO, + light collections collected and speciesdiversity increasedwith each were significantly (P < 0.005) greater than either increase in CO, release rate (Table 3). The general the CO, alone or light alone collections,which were speciesresponse pattern was an increasein collec- not significantly different from each other. This un- tion size as the CO, releaserate was increased.Five Table 3. Speciescomposition and relative abundanceof mosquitoesresponding to increasingcarbon dioxide (COr) releaserates. CO, releaserate (mVmin) Species 200 2,OOO Aedes atlanticus 281 908 I,180 r,935 3,903 8,207 Aedes canadensis canadensis I I 3 8 660 673 Aedes dupreei 136 tt7 299 2t5 ll 778 Aedes fulvus pallens 0 0 o 0 1l Aedes infirmatus 5 69 98 rt2 289 Aedes sticticus 0 U 0 0 1l Aedes triseriatus 0 0 o o 99 Aedes vexans 0 0 0 0 ll Anopheles crucians 7 89 l0l 270 471 Anopheles perplexens n 0 2 0 1A Anop hele s punc tip ennis 0 0 0 0 88 Ano p heI es quadrimaculatus 0 0 0 I t2 Coquille ttidia perturbans 0 0 7 IJ 44 64 Culex erraticus I l1 15 837 Culex nigripalpus 22 65 101 155 228 571 Culex salinarius J t7 20 35 60 135 Culiseta melanura 89 375 3s9 474 228 1,525 Mansonia titillans o 2 0 2 26 Psorophora ciliata 0 0 I 2 58 Psorophora columbiae 0 9 26 103 142 Psorophora ferox 0 0 7 l8 43 68 U rano tae nia sapp hi rina 0 0 0 0 ll Total 540 r,505 2,757 3,098 5,701 13,001 294 JounN,qr oF THEAMERrc.u Mosquno Coxrnol Assocr,qnorq VoL. 14,No.3 tl fll 6 species,Aedes dupreei (Coquillett), Anophelesper- 'll plexens Ludlow, Cs, melanura, Culex erraticus F:* li i- ri !tl o tl VI PF,^PRR,^PP=POz Dyar and Knab, and Mansonia titillans (Walker) rEKrt88t8888 deviated from this generalized responsepattern. For Fll -i -i -i -t ,j -i:::::: ;tl O Ae. dupreei the collection size decreasedas the CO, .99 tl release rate increased from 2 to 20 mvmin and in- !ll creased as the CO, release rate increased to 100 my 6tl tr e min; thereafter collection size decreasedwith each 6 .4. -r).a.a.\\t-:-,a.\:.\ increasein CO, releaserate with the lowest number ;€\obc'l€r)oc.rc.r-o rll ..iciSqq--naoiq-1 of specimens collected at the 2,000 mymin release ui ll - c.) o c-.t<t - o.a - v.i - o otl rate. Specimens of An. perplexezs were only 6 tl an -ll! tl :8333R??89!! trapped at the 100 and 2,000 mVmin release rates o tl r;ddriFi6ioJdJr;6i O\6 o (2 specimens at each rate).
Recommended publications
  • Twenty Years of Surveillance for Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus In
    Oliver et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:362 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2950-1 RESEARCH Open Access Twenty years of surveillance for Eastern equine encephalitis virus in mosquitoes in New York State from 1993 to 2012 JoAnne Oliver1,2*, Gary Lukacik3, John Kokas4, Scott R. Campbell5, Laura D. Kramer6,7, James A. Sherwood1 and John J. Howard1 Abstract Background: The year 1971 was the first time in New York State (NYS) that Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) was identified in mosquitoes, in Culiseta melanura and Culiseta morsitans. At that time, state and county health departments began surveillance for EEEV in mosquitoes. Methods: From 1993 to 2012, county health departments continued voluntary participation with the state health department in mosquito and arbovirus surveillance. Adult female mosquitoes were trapped, identified, and pooled. Mosquito pools were tested for EEEV by Vero cell culture each of the twenty years. Beginning in 2000, mosquito extracts and cell culture supernatant were tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: During the years 1993 to 2012, EEEV was identified in: Culiseta melanura, Culiseta morsitans, Coquillettidia perturbans, Aedes canadensis (Ochlerotatus canadensis), Aedes vexans, Anopheles punctipennis, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Psorophora ferox, Culex salinarius, and Culex pipiens-restuans group. EEEV was detected in 427 adult mosquito pools of 107,156 pools tested totaling 3.96 million mosquitoes. Detections of EEEV occurred in three geographical regions of NYS: Sullivan County, Suffolk County, and the contiguous counties of Madison, Oneida, Onondaga and Oswego. Detections of EEEV in mosquitoes occurred every year from 2003 to 2012, inclusive. EEEV was not detected in 1995, and 1998 to 2002, inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies
    64 ARTHROPOD MONITORING: Mosquito Studies - Greenwoods, Summer 1995 Wi~~iam L. Butts Expanded sampling of the area inunediately adj acent to the large bog ("Cranberry Bog") for anthrophilic mosquitoes was the main focus of studies at Greenwoods. Initial plans to conduct biting/alighting sampling from a boat at selected sites around the margin of the impoundment were abandoned due to logistical difficulties. Emergent and submerged obstructions made it impossible to move about by boat at a rate that would allow for sampling at a sufficient number of sites within the hours of feeding activity. It was also evident that repeated sampling by boat would cause an unacceptable level of disruption to aquatic vegetation. A series of eight sampling sites marked with bicolored streamers was established along the west side of the bog from the point of access to the main dam northward. A similar series was laid out along the east side with three sampling stations south of the one at the dock site and four stations north of it. Biting/alighting collections were made by the author sitting for 20 minutes at each site with one forearm exposed. Mosquitoes alighting upon that arm or at other points on the body within reach of the other arm were collected by inverting a small killing vial over the mosquitoes. Sampling series were begun at approximately first light and in late evening beginning at a time estimated to terminate the series when unaided visual observation became difficult. In most instances one side of the bog was sampled in the evening and the other side the following morning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 228 April 1958 The Mosquitoes of Minnesota (Diptera : Culicidae : Culicinae) A. RALPH BARR University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station ~2 Technirnl Rull!'lin :z2g 1-,he Mosquitoes of J\ilinnesota (Diptera: Culicidae: Culicinae) A. llALPII R\lm University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station CONTENTS I. Introduction JI. Historical Ill. Biology of mosquitoes ................................ Zoogeography Oviposition ......................................... Breeding places of larvae ................................... I) Larrnl p;rowth ....................................... Ill ,\atural factors in the control of larvae .................. JI The pupal stage ............................................... 12 .\lating .................................... _ ..... 12 Feeding of adults ......................................... 12 Hibernation 11 Seasonal distribution II I\ . Techniques Equipment Eggs ............................... · .... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Larvae Pupae Adults Colonization and rearing . IB \. Systematic treatment Keys to genera Adult females . l'J \fale terminalia . 19 Pupae ······················································· .... ········ 2.'i Larvae ····················································· ..... ········ 2S :-n Anopheles ········································· ··························· Anopheles (Anopheles) barberi .................... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · earlei ...•......................... · · · · ·
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Better Understanding of Rift Valley Fever Epidemiology in The
    Balenghien et al. Veterinary Research 2013, 44:78 http://www.veterinaryresearch.org/content/44/1/78 VETERINARY RESEARCH REVIEW Open Access Towards a better understanding of Rift Valley fever epidemiology in the south-west of the Indian Ocean Thomas Balenghien1†, Eric Cardinale1,2†, Véronique Chevalier3†, Nohal Elissa4†, Anna-Bella Failloux5*†, Thiery Nirina Jean Jose Nipomichene4†, Gaelle Nicolas3†, Vincent Michel Rakotoharinome6†, Matthieu Roger1† and Betty Zumbo7† Abstract Rift Valley fever virus (Phlebovirus,Bunyaviridae) is an arbovirus causing intermittent epizootics and sporadic epidemics primarily in East Africa. Infection causes severe and often fatal illness in young sheep, goats and cattle. Domestic animals and humans can be contaminated by close contact with infectious tissues or through mosquito infectious bites. Rift Valley fever virus was historically restricted to sub-Saharan countries. The probability of Rift Valley fever emerging in virgin areas is likely to be increasing. Its geographical range has extended over the past years. As a recent example, autochthonous cases of Rift Valley fever were recorded in 2007–2008 in Mayotte in the Indian Ocean. It has been proposed that a single infected animal that enters a naive country is sufficient to initiate a major outbreak before Rift Valley fever virus would ever be detected. Unless vaccines are available and widely used to limit its expansion, Rift Valley fever will continue to be a critical issue for human and animal health in the region of the Indian Ocean. Table of contents humans, symptoms vary from a flu-like syndrome to en- cephalitic, ocular or hemorrhagic syndrome. The case fa- 1. Disease and transmission tality rate of the latter form can be as high as 50% [3].
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification System for Mosquito Life Cycles: Life Cycle Types for Mosquitoes of the Northeastern United States
    June, 2004 Journal of Vector Ecology 1 Distinguished Achievement Award Presentation at the 2003 Society for Vector Ecology Meeting A classification system for mosquito life cycles: life cycle types for mosquitoes of the northeastern United States Wayne J. Crans Mosquito Research and Control, Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 180 Jones Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, U.S.A. Received 8 January 2004; Accepted 16 January 2004 ABSTRACT: A system for the classification of mosquito life cycle types is presented for mosquito species found in the northeastern United States. Primary subdivisions include Univoltine Aedine, Multivoltine Aedine, Multivoltine Culex/Anopheles, and Unique Life Cycle Types. A montotypic subdivision groups life cycle types restricted to single species. The classification system recognizes 11 shared life cycle types and three that are limited to single species. Criteria for assignments include: 1) where the eggs are laid, 2) typical larval habitat, 3) number of generations per year, and 4) stage of the life cycle that overwinters. The 14 types in the northeast have been named for common model species. A list of species for each life cycle type is provided to serve as a teaching aid for students of mosquito biology. Journal of Vector Ecology 29 (1): 1-10. 2004. Keyword Index: Mosquito biology, larval mosquito habitats, classification of mosquito life cycles. INTRODUCTION strategies that do not fit into any of the four basic temperate types that Bates described in his book. Two There are currently more than 3,000 mosquito of the mosquitoes he suggested as model species occur species in the world grouped in 39 genera and 135 only in Europe and one of his temperate life cycle types subgenera (Clements 1992, Reinert 2000, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • A-Lovisolo.Vp:Corelventura
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(suppl.– Fossil Insects): 37-50, Kraków, 15 Oct., 2003 Searching for palaeontological evidence of viruses that multiply in Insecta and Acarina Osvaldo LOVISOLO and Oscar RÖSLER Received: 31 March, 2002 Accepted for publication: 17 Oct., 2002 LOVISOLO O., RÖSLER O. 2003. Searching for palaeontological evidence of viruses that multiply in Insecta and Acarina. Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(suppl.– Fossil Insects): 37-50. Abstract. Viruses are known to be agents of important diseases of Insecta and Acarina, and many vertebrate and plant viruses have arthropods as propagative vectors. There is fossil evidence of arthropod pathogens for some micro-organisms, but not for viruses. Iso- lated virions would be hard to detect but, in fossil material, it could be easier to find traces of virus infection, mainly virus-induced cellular structures (VICS), easily recognisable by electron microscopy, such as virions encapsulated in protein occlusion bodies, aggregates of membrane-bounded virus particles and crystalline arrays of numerous virus particles. The following main taxa of viruses that multiply in arthropods are discussed both for some of their evolutionary aspects and for the VICS they cause in arthropods: A. dsDNA Poxviridae, Asfarviridae, Baculoviridae, Iridoviridae, Polydnaviridae and Ascoviridae, infecting mainly Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera and Acarina; B. ssDNA Parvoviridae, infecting mainly Diptera and Lepidoptera; C. dsRNA Reoviridae and Bir- naviridae, infecting mainly Diptera, Hymenoptera and Acarina, and plant viruses also multiplying in Hemiptera; D. Amb.-ssRNA Bunyaviridae and Tenuivirus, that multiply in Diptera and Hemiptera (animal viruses) and in Thysanoptera and Hemiptera (plant vi- ruses); E. -ssRNA Rhabdoviridae, multiplying in Diptera and Acarina (vertebrate vi- ruses), and mainly in Hemiptera (plant viruses); F.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Preference of Host-Seeking Coquillettidia Perturbans (Walker) in Relation to Birds and Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis Virus in New Jersey1
    June'2001 Journal of Vector Ecology 1740^0 103 Habitat preference of host-seeking Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker) in relation to birds and eastern equine encephalomyelitis virus in New Jersey1 Peter J. Bosak2, Lisa M. Reed3 and Wayne J. Crans4 'Cape May County Mosquito Control Commission. PO Box 66, Cape May Court 3 House, NJ 08210-0931 Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 93 Lipman Dr., New Brunswick, 4 NJ 08901-8524 Mosquito Research and Control. Rutgers University, 180 Jones Ave.. New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8536 Received 7 July 2000; Accepted 22 February 2001 ABSTRACT: Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker) has been implicated as a bridge vector of eastern equine encephalomyelitis vims in North America. Eastern equine encephalomyelitis vims epizootics occur regularly in wild birds in New Jersey with little or no involvement of susceptible dead end hosts even though high populations of perturbans are Several 07. present. factors may limit eastern equine encephalomyelitis (EEE) vims transfer from birds to mosquito bridge vectors like Cq. perturbans (Walker), including bird/mosquito density differences in bird/mosquito habitat preference, mosquito host preference, mosquito host-seeking behavior and mosquito birds-our lnvestlgations ^; focused on the host-seeking activities ofCq. perturbans at Colliers Mils Wildlife^.L^T01"^ Management Area in Ocean County, New Jersey. We first examined the abundance of host- seeking Cq. perturbans at a of height 1.0 m in each of three habitats: forest, open field and marsh We collected significantly more mosquitoes in the forest as compared to the marsh. Forest and field collections did not differ significantly from one another nor did field and marsh.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Equine Encephalitis Center for Food Security and Public Health
    Eastern Equine Encephalitis S l i d Eastern Equine e Encephalitis Sleeping Sickness 1 Eastern Encephalitis S In today’s presentation we will cover information regarding the agent l Overview that causes eastern equine encephalomyelitis and its epidemiology. i • Organism We will also talk about the history of this diseases, how it is d • History transmitted, species that it affects, and clinical signs seen in humans e • Epidemiology and animals. Finally, we will address prevention and control • Transmission measures, as well as actions to take if eastern equine • Disease in Humans encephalomyelitis is suspected. [Photo: Horses in a field. Source: 2 • Disease in Animals • Prevention and Control U.S. Department of Agriculture] • Actions to Take Center for Food Security and Public Health, Iowa State University, 2011 S l i d e THE ORGANISM 3 S Eastern equine encephalomyelitis (EEE) results from infection by the l The Virus respectively named virus in the genus Alphavirus (family i • Family Togaviridae Togaviridae). The numerous isolates of the Eastern equine d • Genus Alphavirus encephalomyelitis virus (EEEV) can be grouped into two variants. e • Two variants The variant found in North America is more pathogenic than the • Mosquito-borne variant that occurs in South and Central America. EEE is a mosquito- • Disease borne, viral infection that can cause severe encephalitis in horses and 4 – Encephalitis in humans and horses humans. [Photo: Electron micrograph of the Eastern equine encephalitis virus. Source: Dr. Fred Murphy and Sylvia Center for Food Security and Public Health, Iowa State University, 2011 Whitfield/CDC Public Health Image Library] S l i d e HISTORY 5 Center for Food Security and Public Health 2011 1 Eastern Equine Encephalitis S EEE was first isolated from a horse with encephalomyelitis in 1933, l EEE History but it is thought that the disease dates back to 1831 to horses in i • 1831: Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Influences for the Tree Canopy Preference of Culex Pipiens and Culiseta Melanura
    Environmental Influences for the Tree Canopy Preference of Culex pipiens and Culiseta melanura Senior Thesis December 2005 Frank Cornine Unity College 42 Murdock Drive Unity, Maine 04988 [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..4 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………7 Results……………………………………………………………………………………..9 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………..14 References………………………………………………………………………………..17 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………..20 2 ABSTRACT In our study we found that when mosquito collections were made on the same night and location, with one trap placed in the tree canopy and the other trap at ground level, there were a significantly higher number of Culex pipiens and Culiseta melanura in the tree canopy traps. These two trap levels also exhibited no significant difference in temperature, although it was determined that there was a significantly higher relative humidity at the ground level than in the canopy. This difference in relative humidity was also found to not be significantly correlated with the collections. By learning more about the biology of Culex pipiens, as well as other mosquitoes, we will be able to devise more effective methods to hamper their negative effects on humans without impacting other parts of the ecosystem. 3 INTRODUCTION Since the discovery of West Nile virus (WNV) in the United States in 1999, much emphasis has been placed on learning more about its transmission and characteristics of the specific mosquito species involved (Kulasekera, 2001; Nasci, 2001; Kilpatrick, 2005). The first known human case of WNV was reported in New York City, in August of 1999. After this first case there were an additional 61 humans positive for WNV in New York, from August to October of 1999, consisting mostly of elderly people (Enserink, 2000; Rappole, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Aedes Cinereus
    Entomologist Challenge – Aedes cinereus John Shepard Sean McCann (Flicker) Department of Environmental Sciences Center for Vector Biology & Zoonotic Diseases The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven, CT Quick Facts • “True” Aedes • Described by German dipterist, Johann Wilhelm Meigen, in 1818 • Type species for the subgenus Aedes • Has not been subject to name changes • Synonym Species in the Northeastern US • Aedes fuscus, described from male and female specimens collected in Cambridge, MA by Osten Sacken, 1877 • Culex pallidothirta, described from female specimens collected in Orange Mts., NJ by Grossbeck, 1905 Refernce: Knight K. L, and A. Stone. 1977. A catalog of the mosquitoes of the world (Diptera: Culicidae): Vol. VI. The Thomas Say Foundation, Entomolgical Society of America, College Park, MD. Quick Facts • Holarctic distribution • northern latitudes of North America, Europe and northern Asia (Mongolia, Russia) • Does not have a “flashy” appearance as an adult • Medium-sized • Brownish-tan • Wings and legs with all dark scales • Nuisance • Aggressive biter during morning and early evening • Biting activity in wooded areas, near lavral habitat • “Ankle biter” • Medical and Veterinary Importance • Vector of a variety of pathogens Life History • Desiccation-resistant eggs laid in a variety of temporary and permanent water habitats • Larvae develop in a wide variety of freshwater habitats • Major generation in spring with sporadic egg hatch late • Overwinters in egg stage Similar life cycle with Ochlerotatus canadensis and Oc. sticticus Reference: Crans W. A classification system for mosquito life cycles: life cycle types for mosquitoes of the northeastern United States. J. Vector Ecol. 2004. (1) 1-10. Larval Habitat • Larvae found in Temporary and Semi-Permanent pools • Shallow leaf-lined pools • Heavy to light shade • Deeper pools - associated with emergent vegetation • Sedge tussocks and boggy areas of ponds and swamps • Associated species in larval habitats include: • Oc.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Factors Associated with Operation-Level Prevalence of Antibodies to Cache Valley Virus and Other Bunyamwera Serogroup Viruses in Sheep in the United States
    Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine Publications Medicine 11-13-2015 Management Factors Associated with Operation- Level Prevalence of Antibodies to Cache Valley Virus and Other Bunyamwera Serogroup Viruses in Sheep in the United States Matthew .T Meyers Iowa State University Charlie S. Bahnson Iowa State University Michael Hanlon Iowa State University CFohrlloiswtine thi Ks oprandal additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/vdpam_pubs UnitPeda Srta oftes theDepaCrtmompent aofr aAtgivriceu altndure Laboratory Animal Medicine Commons, Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine Commons, Sheep and Goat Science Commons, Veterinary Microbiology and ISmmaengchunoabnio Slorisinlgy Capommonaudoms, and the Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public HIoweaalth Sta tCe Uommonniversitys TheSee nex tompc page forle addte bitioniblaiol agruthorapshic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ vdpam_pubs/101. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Management Factors Associated with Operation-Level Prevalence of Antibodies to Cache Valley Virus and Other Bunyamwera Serogroup Viruses in Sheep in the United States Abstract A cross-sectional study was performed to identify operation-level risk factors associated with prevalence of antibody to Bunyamwera (BUN) serogroup viruses in sheep in the United States.
    [Show full text]