DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Utah History 4795 Mormonism and the American Experience Fall Semester 2017 T, Th 2:00 – 3:20, WBB 617

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Utah History 4795 Mormonism and the American Experience Fall Semester 2017 T, Th 2:00 – 3:20, WBB 617 University of Utah History 4795 Mormonism and the American Experience Fall Semester 2017 T, Th 2:00 – 3:20, WBB 617 W. Paul Reeve CTIHB 323 585-9231 Office hours: T, 10:30 – 11:30 a.m.; W, 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. [email protected] Course Description: This course explores the historical development of Mormonism in an American context, from its Second Great Awakening beginnings to the beginning of the twenty-first century. It situates the founding and development of Mormonism within the contexts of American cultural, economic, social, religious, racial, and political history. A central theme is the ebb and flow over time of tension between Mormonism and broader American society. How did conflicts over Mormonism during the nineteenth century, especially the conflict over polygamy and theocracy, help define the limits of religious tolerance in this country? How have LDS beliefs, practices, and culture positioned and repositioned Mormons within U.S. society? Learning Outcomes: 1. To situate the development of Mormonism within broader American historical contexts and thereby arrive at a greater understanding of religion’s place in American life. a. To understand the impact of Mormonism upon American history. b. To understand the impact of American history upon Mormonism. 2. To formulate and articulate in class discussions, exams, and through written assignments intelligent and informed arguments concerning the major developments and events that have shaped Mormonism over time. 3. To cultivate the critical mind in response to a variety of historical perspectives. Perspective: This course studies Mormonism in an academic setting. In doing so our purpose is not to debate the truth or falsehood of religious claims, but rather to examine how religious beliefs and experiences functioned in the lives of individuals and communities. Course readings will represent a variety of perspectives, from the faithful believer to that of detractors and critics and everything in between. These perspectives are designed to not only offer insights into Mormon history, but to teach about the various reactions Mormonism has engendered. This course is not about promoting or detracting from anyone’s faith, but seeks to understand religion as a motivating power in Mormon lives and how it intersected with broader forces and peoples in American history over time. Required Texts: Johnson & Wilentz, The Kingdom of Matthias. Oxford University Press, 1994. Mason & Turner, Out of Obscurity: Mormonism since 1945. Oxford, 2016. Additional readings found under the “files” tab on CANVAS Optional Text: Bowman, The Mormon People. Random House, 2012. COURSE ASSIGNMENTS Attendance and Class Participation: Regular attendance is recommended and can enhance your final grade. Each student is expected to read the material assigned in the class schedule before coming to class. As you read, think critically about the material and form your own opinions about the main concepts in each selection. Your informed opinions, questions, and comments are valued and participation will be graded. A student who comes to every class, but never participates, will receive a grade of F in class participation. Discussions: Class discussions will follow major themes from the textbooks, but will not merely rehash the texts. Exam questions will come from the texts, lectures, and discussions, therefore class participation and note taking are strongly recommended. Quizzes: There will be six unannounced quizzes given throughout the semester. The quizzes are designed to test your understanding of the assigned readings. Each quiz is worth ten points; only your five highest scores will be used in the final grade. There will be no make up quizzes given, except for university excused absences. Exams: There will be two exams, one midterm and one take-home final. The midterm exam will consist of identification and essay questions. The final is a comprehensive essay and will be worth 100 points. Response Papers: Each student is expected to write two 1,200 - 1,500 word response papers on topics of your choice from the list in the class schedule. Your papers should be typed, double spaced, 12 point font, and should include a word count on the first page under your name. You should upload your response paper through CANVAS. It must be uploaded before the beginning of class the day it is due or it will be considered late. These papers will be written in response to the additional reading listed under the six dashes (------) on a given day’s assigned readings. On days with multiple sets of additional readings, you are free to choose the set you read. You will select your topics the first week of class. Your response papers are then due at the beginning of class on the day we discuss that topic as listed on the class schedule. Your response papers should make sense of a day’s topic through a careful analysis of all of the readings assigned on that day. They should evaluate the readings for that day and consider them a combined set of knowledge on a given topic. What do the readings as a synthetic whole teach you about the topic for that day and by extension what do they teach you about Mormon and US history? What are the main arguments each historian makes in his or her essay and how does she or he support those arguments? How do the readings relate to each other? Do they agree or disagree? What messages do the readings convey and how do they convey them? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments and evidence? From what perspectives do the various historians write? Do you agree or disagree with the historians’ interpretations, evidence, and arguments? Why or why not? What new insights, ideas, and information did you receive and what is your response? You should demonstrate an ability to think critically about the readings, and to respond with a well-reasoned analysis. Each response should demonstrate an ability to think independently and should contain sound analysis that exhibits a command of interpretive and conceptual skills. Use well-chosen examples, persuasive reasoning, and solid evidence directly applicable to the readings. Structure your essays so that they move easily from one point to the next with clear, smooth, and appropriate transitions, coherent organization, and fully developed paragraphs. Spelling, grammar, punctuation, and a clear organization of ideas are essential to obtaining an “A” on this assignment. Please remember that there is no good writing, only good rewriting. Take the time to proofread and rewrite your paper. Critical Analysis Take Home Final: Each student is expected to select a popular culture representation of Mormonism (a movie, novel, television show, a collection of political cartoons organized around a common theme, or a website) from a list of possibilities in the “Popular Culture” folder under the “files” tab on CANVAS. If you select a pop culture representation not on the list you must get it approved by me before proceeding. You will then write a 2,000 to 2,750 word critical analysis of your selection scrutinizing it against what you have learned this semester. Your analysis should consider the perspective of your selection, its strengths, and its weaknesses. How does it portray Mormonism and why? What messages does it convey? What does it want its audience to believe about Mormonism? What does it do well? What could it do better? Does it serve to contribute to stereotypes about Mormons or does it serve to correct them? How so? What are the stereotypes it perpetuates or seeks to correct? Does your selected work portray Mormonism in a historically accurate manner? Why or why not? Be sure to draw upon the readings and class discussions from this semester to inform your analysis. You might choose to focus your response on one or two themes from this semester around which to organize your paper (gender, race, Joseph Smith, polygamy, prophets, etc.) and compare and contrast portrayals of that/those theme(s) between what you have studied in class and your chosen pop culture medium. Your chosen theme(s) might be that/those for which you wrote response papers. Your take-home final should assume that I know the basic content of your pop culture representation and should not merely rehash it. Rather your final paper should analyze your selected medium in the same way that Jana Riess analyzes the popular culture representations of Mormonism in her essay that we read for class. Your response should demonstrate an ability to think independently and should contain sound analysis that exhibits a command of interpretive and conceptual skills. Your paper should contain an easily identifiable thesis. It should use well-chosen examples, persuasive reasoning, and solid evidence directly applicable to your thesis. Structure your essay so that it moves easily from one point to the next with clear, smooth, and appropriate transitions, coherent organization, and fully developed paragraphs. Spelling, grammar, punctuation, and a clear organization of ideas are essential to obtaining an “A” on this assignment. Please remember that there is no good writing—only good rewriting. Take the time to proofread and rewrite your paper. Your response is due on the day listed in the class schedule. It should be typed, double spaced, twelve point font, one inch margins, and the front page should include your name and a total word count for the paper. Plagiarism: When writing your response paper, ANY and ALL direct quotes should be cited with a parenthetical reference such as this (p. #). ANY and ALL quotes or references from other material apart from the readings under review must be footnoted. This includes direct quotes, paraphrases, and the use of themes or ideas articulated by another person. Do not plagiarize! Plagiarism is a serious offense which violates general standards of honesty (see http://www.sa.utah.edu/code/html for more information).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Essays on the Persecution of Religious Minorities by David Thomas Smith
    Essays on the Persecution of Religious Minorities by David Thomas Smith A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor William R. Clark, co-chair Professor Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, co-chair Professor Robert J. Franzese, Jr. Professor Andrei S. Markovits Professor Robert W. Mickey i Acknowledgements Throughout the last six and a half years I have benefited enormously from the mentorship and friendship of my wonderful dissertation committee members: Bill Clark, Anna Grzymala-Busse, Andy Markovits, Rob Mickey and Rob Franzese. I assembled this committee before I even knew what I wanted to write about, and I made the right choices—I cannot imagine a more supportive, patient and insightful group of advisers. They gave me badly-needed discipline when I needed it (which was all the time) and oversaw numerous episodes of Schumpeterian “creative destruction.” They also gave me more ideas than I could ever hope to assimilate, ideas which will be providing me with directions for future research for many years to come. But these huge contributions are minor in comparison to the fact that they taught me how to think like a political scientist. I couldn’t ask for anything more. All of these papers had trial runs in various internal workshops and seminars at the University of Michigan, and I profited greatly from the structured feedback that I received from the Michigan political science community, faculty and grad students alike. Thanks to everyone who was a discussant for one of these papers—Zvi Gitelman, Chuck Shipan, Sana Jaffrey, Cassie Grafstrom (twice!), Ron Inglehart, Ken Kollman, Allison Dale, Pam Brandwein, Andrea Jones-Rooy, Rob Salmond and Jenna Bednar.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of the Church of Christ” in Relation to Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants
    An Examination of the 829 “Articles of the Church of Christ” in Relation to Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants Scott H. Faulring he 829 “Articles of the Church of Christ” is a little-known anteced- Tent to section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants. This article explores Joseph Smith’s and Oliver Cowdery’s involvement in bringing forth these two documents that were important in laying the foundation for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Section 20 was originally labeled the “Articles and Covenants.” It was the first revelation canonized by the restored Church and the most lengthy revelation given before the first priesthood conference was held in June 830. Scriptural commentators in recent years have described the inspired set of instructions in section 20 as “a constitution for the restored church.”1 In many respects, the Articles and Covenants was the Church’s earliest General Handbook of Instructions. Although Latter-day Saints typically associate the Articles and Covenants with the organization of the Church on April 6, 830, this regulatory document had roots in earlier events: in the earliest latter-day revelations, in statements on Church ordinances and organization from the Book of Mormon, and in the preliminary set of Articles written by Oliver Cowdery in the last half of 829. This article will review those early revelations to show how the organi- zation of the Church was prophetically foreshadowed and instituted. It will then identify certain prescriptions in the Book of Mormon that influenced the steps taken and pronouncements issued as the Church was organized on April 6, 830.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyal Follower, Bold Preacher
    REVIEWS Loyal Follower, Bold Preacher Terryl L. Givens, Matthew J. Grow. Parley P. Pratt: The Apostle Paul of Mormonism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 396 pp. Appendices, Notes, Index. Hardcover: $34.95. ISBN: 978–0–19– 537573–2 Reviewed by John G. Turner In May 1857, a jilted husband finally found the man who had taken his wife. After tracking him to western Arkansas, he orga- nized a posse to cut off his escape, followed him into a thicket of trees, pulled him from his horse, and stabbed him repeatedly near his heart. Hector McLean left to fetch a gun, returned, and fatally shot Mormon apostle Parley P. Pratt in the neck. In Parley P. Pratt: The Apostle Paul of Mormonism, Terryl Givens and Matthew Grow tell the dramatic story of Pratt’s tumultuous fifty-year life. Since his death, Pratt has remained a beloved mar- tyr to many Latter-day Saints, still admired for his Autobiography, his authorship of seven hymns in the current LDS hymnal, and his missionary zeal. While historians continue to debate his death’s role in the Utah War and the Mountain Meadows Massacre, he is not well known outside the church, an oversight that The Apostle Paul of Mormonism may partly correct. After years of spiritual seeking and dalliances with Baptists and Campbellites, in 1830 Pratt encountered the Book of Mormon, read it, believed, and immediately began preaching Mormonism across the northern United States. For the remainder of his life, Pratt impoverished himself and his family through his relentless commitment to missionary service on behalf of his church.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN FARNHAM BOYNTON Susan Easton Black
    JOHN FARNHAM BOYNTON Susan Easton Black "Joseph Smith, a fallen Prophet" was the boisterous this section, and there are more convinced of the truth, but cry of many disillusioned Mormons, among whom were are still lingering on the threshold of the church . those who once purported to be tried and true believers of Brethren, pray for me, that I may have words of wisdom." the new faith The shock wave of their shrill accusations and These prayers were answered as John, "with the stick of derision shook the core structure of Mormon society in Joseph [the Book of Mormon] in one hand, and the stick of Kirtlan& Ohio. As community and church leader Parley P. Judah [the Bible] in the other, labor[ed] diligently in this Pratt penned, "I also was overcome by the same spirit in a world" to bring the message of the Restoration to the great measure, and it seemed as if the very powers of inhabitants of New England.4 darkness which war against the Saints were let loose upon me."' Joseph Smith, seeing the spirit of apostasy afflict even Perhaps c?. - . the "elect," wondered whom he could still trust. To it was of no returning missionary Wilford Woodruff he lamented, surprise that "Brother Woodruff, I am glad to see you. I hardly know John Famham when I meet those who have been my brethren in the Lord, Boynton, of all who of them are my fiends. They have become so scarce."' the faithful ,a As the once faimturned their heels and willfully rebelled elders in the -,a= against teachings they had once embraced, some of the Church in youngest--but surely the brightest--succumbed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Response to Joseph Smith's Innovations in the Second
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2011 Recreating Religion: The Response to Joseph Smith’s Innovations in the Second Prophetic Generation of Mormonism Christopher James Blythe Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Religion Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Blythe, Christopher James, "Recreating Religion: The Response to Joseph Smith’s Innovations in the Second Prophetic Generation of Mormonism" (2011). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 916. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/916 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECREATING RELIGION: THE RESPONSE TO JOSEPH SMITH’S INNOVATIONS IN THE SECOND PROPHETIC GENERATION OF MORMONISM by Christopher James Blythe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Approved: _________________________ _________________________ Philip L. Barlow, ThD Daniel J. McInerney, PhD Major Professor Committee Member _________________________ _________________________ Richard Sherlock, PhD Byron R. Burnham, EdD Committee Member Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2010 ii Copyright © Christopher James Blythe 2010 All rights reserved. iii ABSTRACT Recreating Religion: The Response to Joseph Smith’s Innovations in the Second Prophetic Generation of Mormonism by Christopher James Blythe, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2010 Major Professor: Philip Barlow Department: History On June 27, 1844, Joseph Smith, the founder of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was assassinated.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 13, 1986
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 1 1986 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 13, 1986 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (1986) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 13, 1986," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 13 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol13/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 13, 1986 Table of Contents • --Mormon Women, Other Women: Paradoxes and Challenges Anne Firor Scott, 3 • --Strangers in a Strange Land: Heber J. Grant and the Opening of the Japanese Mission Ronald W. Walker, 21 • --Lamanism, Lymanism, and Cornfields Richard E. Bennett, 45 • --Mormon Missionary Wives in Nineteenth Century Polynesia Carol Cornwall Madsen, 61 • --The Federal Bench and Priesthood Authority: The Rise and Fall of John Fitch Kinney's Early Relationship with the Mormons Michael W. Homer, 89 • --The 1903 Dedication of Russia for Missionary Work Kahlile Mehr, 111 • --Between Two Cultures: The Mormon Settlement of Star Valley, Wyoming Dean L.May, 125 Keywords 1986-1987 This full issue is available in Journal of Mormon History: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol13/iss1/ 1 Journal of Mormon History Editorial Staff LEONARD J. ARRINGTON, Editor LOWELL M. DURHAM, Jr., Assistant Editor ELEANOR KNOWLES, Assistant Editor FRANK McENTIRE, Assistant Editor MARTHA ELIZABETH BRADLEY, Assistant Editor JILL MULVAY DERR, Assistant Editor Board of Editors MARIO DE PILLIS (1988), University of Massachusetts PAUL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Harris: the Kirtland Years, 18314870
    Martin Harris: The Kirtland Years, 18314870 H. Michael Marquardt MARTIN HARRIS IS KNOWN for being a Book of Mormon scribe, witness, and financier. However, little is known about his activities while living in Kirtland, Ohio, for over thirty-five years. This article will present what is known about Harris during the Kirtland years. Included will be his re- lationship to other Restoration churches under the leadership of James J. Strang (including Harris's mission to England), William E. McLellin, and so forth. A brief background of Harris's life in New York will also be given to help understand his place in the early life of the church. NEW YORK SEEKER Martin Harris was born on 18 May 1783 at Eastown, New York. He was a well-established farmer of Palmyra, Ontario (later Wayne) County, New York. At the age of twenty-six, Harris married his cousin Lucy; he was nine years her senior. They had a family of four known children. He became a close associate of Joseph Smith, Jr., whom he assisted finan- cially, and he acted as a scribe to Smith.1 He also financed the publication of the Book of Mormon by mortgaging his farm. As an early convert of Mormonism, he was received into fellowship by baptism on the day the church was organized. Due to the time and resources spent on his new re- ligion, Harris became partially separated from his wife, Lucy. Orsamus Turner, a printer in New York, described Harris thusly: Martin Harris, was a farmer of Palmyra, the owner of a good farm, and an honest worthy citizen; but especially given to religious enthusiasm, new creeds, the more extravagant the better; a monomaniac, in fact.2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • PD10052298 000 C01 L15-Remain Strong.Indd
    FOUNDATIONS OF THE RESTORATION—LESSON 15 Remaining Strong in Times of Opposition Apostasy in Kirtland: The Need to Faithfully Follow Conflict in Northern Missouri: Learning to Endure Church Leaders Opposition Well In 1837, the Saints in Kirtland, Ohio, experienced some finan- In 1837 and 1838, some disaffected and excommunicated cial problems. To help the Saints be more self-sufficient in their members of the Church living among the Saints in Far West finances, Joseph Smith and other Church leaders established began to bring lawsuits against the Church and its leaders and a company similar to a bank and called it the Kirtland Safety to harass the Church. In June 1838, Sidney Rigdon spoke heat- Society. Because of a widespread economic depression during edly in what has become known as the “Salt Sermon.” He ref- this time, many banks failed throughout the United States. erenced Matthew 5:13 and said that if the salt loses its savor, it The Kirtland Safety Society also failed in the fall of 1837. Two is good for nothing and should be cast out, implying that those hundred investors in the bank lost almost everything, with who had left the Church should be cast out from among the Joseph Smith sustaining the greatest losses. Even though the Saints. Two weeks later, on July 4, Sidney Rigdon gave a speech Kirtland Safety Society was not funded by the Church, some of in which he promised that the Saints would defend themselves the Saints considered it a Church bank or the Prophet’s bank even if it came to a “war of extermination.” Though both of and blamed Joseph Smith for their financial problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine Spencer: Nauvoo Gentile, Joseph Smith Antagonist
    Sadler and Sadler: Augustine Spencer 27 Augustine Spencer: Nauvoo Gentile, Joseph Smith Antagonist Richard W. Sadler and Claudia S. Sadler Daniel Spencer Sr., his wife Chloe, and sons Daniel Jr., Orson, and Hi- ram Spencer and their families were devoted Nauvoo Mormons. However, in the six months preceding Joseph Smith’s death, their eldest son, Augustine Spencer, who also lived in Nauvoo, but who remained aloof from the Church, turned antagonistic toward his family, became an outspoken critic against the Church, and participated in the activities that led to Joseph Smith’s arrest and death at Carthage. How and why Augustine’s antagonism toward Mormonism developed provides a historical case study that sheds light on the complex religious, cultural, and social dynamics of nineteenth-century society and the Spencer family. The Daniel Sr. and Chloe Wilson Spencer Family Daniel Spencer Sr., born August 26, 1764, spent his early years in East Haddam, Connecticut, on the Connecticut River. His ancestors had arrived in Massachusetts during the first decade of the great Puritan migration of the RICH A RD W. SA DLER ([email protected])is a professor of history and former dean of the college of Social and Behavioral Sciences at Weber State University. He received his BS, MS, and PhD degrees from the University of Utah. He specializes in nineteenth century US history. He is a fellow of the Utah State Historical Society, former editor of the Journal of Mormon History, past president of the Mormon History Association, and past chair of the Utah State Board of Education. CL A UDI A SPENCER SA DLER ([email protected]) received her undergraduate education at the University of Utah and Weber State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Corner Stones of Reorganization
    CORNER STONES OF "REORGANIZATION" A A A A FEW FACTS CONCERNING ITS FOUNDERS . COMPILED FROM EARLY CHURCH HP,TOR Y A A A When men come as servants of God, claiming a divine com- mission to reorganize the Church of Christ, the searchlight of investigation should be turned upon them. If they bear it there is evidence, that they have been sent of God. But if inconsistencies hedge their entire course of life it is well for an inquirer after truth to examine their AUTHORITY. William Marks, Zenos H. Gurley, William W. Blair and Samuel Powers ordained the Son of the Prophet to succeed his father as President of the Church. William W. Blair and Samuel Powers were never members of the original Church. We, therefore, pass them by, and proceed to bring out a few facts from early Church history relative to Marks, Gurley and Briggs, the two latter being the founders of the "Reorganiza- tion." HISTORY OF WILLIAM MARKS. After making this acknowledgment he was received back WILLIAM MARKS was President of the Nauvoo Stake at into fellowship, but did not again obtain his former position. the time of the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph, June 27, He became dissatisfied, withdrew from the Church and was 1844. excommunicated. SOMETHING FROM THE PROPHET'S JOURNAL. JOINS THE STRANGITE ORGANIZATION AND PLAYS A LEADING PART. "Whatever can be the matter with these men (Law and Marks) ? Is it that the wicked flee when no man pursueth? Copied from the "Voree Record," official record of that hit pigeons always flutter? that drowning men catch at Strangite Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Mormon History in Illinois, 1839-48: an Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTRIBUTIONS NO. Sources of Mormon History in Illinois, 1839-48: An Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University Compiled by STANLEY B. KIMBALL 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, 1966 The Library SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Carbondale—Edwardsville Bibliographic Contributions No. 1 SOURCES OF MORMON HISTORY IN ILLINOIS, 1839-48 An Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, 1966 Compiled by Stanley B. Kimball Central Publications Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois ©2014 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, May, 1966 FOREWORD In the course of developing a book and manuscript collection and in providing reference service to students and faculty, a univeristy library frequently prepares special bibliographies, some of which may prove to be of more than local interest. The Bibliographic Contributions series, of which this is the first number, has been created as a means of sharing the results of such biblio­ graphic efforts with our colleagues in other universities. The contribu­ tions to this series will appear at irregular intervals, will vary widely in subject matter and in comprehensiveness, and will not necessarily follow a uniform bibliographic format. Because many of the contributions will be by-products of more extensive research or will be of a tentative nature, the series is presented in this format. Comments, additions, and corrections will be welcomed by the compilers. The author of the initial contribution in the series is Associate Professor of History of Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Illinois. He has been engaged in research on the Nauvoo period of the Mormon Church since he came to the university in 1959 and has published numerous articles on this subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Mormon Witnesses and Their Challenge to Secularism
    INTERPRETER§ A Journal of Mormon Scripture Volume 27 · 2017 · Pages vii-xxviii The Book of Mormon Witnesses and Their Challenge to Secularism Daniel C. Peterson Offprint Series © 2017 The Interpreter Foundation. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. ISSN 2372-1227 (print) ISSN 2372-126X (online) The goal of The Interpreter Foundation is to increase understanding of scripture through careful scholarly investigation and analysis of the insights provided by a wide range of ancillary disciplines, including language, history, archaeology, literature, culture, ethnohistory, art, geography, law, politics, philosophy, etc. Interpreter will also publish articles advocating the authenticity and historicity of LDS scripture and the Restoration, along with scholarly responses to critics of the LDS faith. We hope to illuminate, by study and faith, the eternal spiritual message of the scriptures—that Jesus is the Christ. Although the Board fully supports the goals and teachings of the Church, The Interpreter Foundation is an independent entity and is neither owned, controlled by nor affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or with Brigham Young University. All research and opinions provided are the sole responsibility of their respective authors, and should not be interpreted as the opinions of the Board, nor as official statements of LDS doctrine, belief or practice. This journal is a weekly publication.
    [Show full text]