July 12, 2021 VIA EMAIL FOIA Coordinator Michigan Department
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biden Letter 09092020 DJTFP
Jenna Ellis, Esq. Senior Legal Adviser [email protected] September 9, 2020 Biden for President Attn: Jennifer O’Malley Dillon PO Box 58174 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Re: False, Misleading, and Deceptive Biden Campaign Advertisement Dear Ms. O’Malley Dillon: On behalf of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., President Trump’s principal campaign committee, this letter notifies you that Biden for President (the “Biden Campaign”) produced and caused to be posted on Joe Biden’s Twitter feed a digital ad1 that contains intentionally false and misleading statements that cannot be verified when it alleges that President Trump made derogatory comments towards fallen American military heroes (the “False and Misleading Ad”). President Trump unequivocally denies making these statements. The Atlantic article2 and the False and Misleading Ad both rely upon statements allegedly made by anonymous sources who were directly contradicted on the record by twenty-one individuals present with President Trump that day. Additionally, the contemporary facts in the Secret Service record totally debunk this fake story. In fact, President Trump has a monumental record of supporting veterans and veterans’ causes – probably more so than any other President in American history. The False and Misleading Ad by its very nature is unreliable. Twitter claims that it has a role in slowing the spread of misinformation in a statement published on June 14, 2017, reading in part: “Twitter’s job is to keep people informed about what’s happening in the world. As such, we care deeply about the issue of misinformation and its potentially harmful effect on the civic and political discourse that is core to our mission.” The statement goes on to describe generally the action Twitter takes in instances of policy violations. -
VA SHIVA Runs for U.S
'-.i Of:-''"}-'P.[) ^ REMED. , '-.(vnoN 8J|. ELECTIONCl. crTiniJ rut'. ",v*. ^17 2C!7 Jl'S 23 ffl 2: 25 Holllston, MA 01746 ^•":rEOF GENERAL June 16, 2017 - • • s M-or! SSELEHSiZ: Office of General Counsel MUR Federal Election Commission 999 E. Street, NW Washington, DC 20463 4 To whom it may concern. I am writing to file an official complaint against Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to be running for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts. I am enclosing a copy of a printout from his business web page which is also used to publicize his campaign. Use of a business web page for a campaign is a violation of FEC rules. Additionally, even if allowed, the web page lacks the appropriate disclaimer In a box as per FEC rules. A Thank you for jtour attention to this matter. 1I Page Commonwealth of Massachusetts Middlesex, ss June 2017 On this day o; before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Martin A. fcamb, proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which were Massachusetts Driver's License, to be the person who signed the preceding or attached document in my presence, and who swore or affirmed to me that the contents of the document are truthful and accurate to the best of his knowledge and belief. (official signature and seal of notary) My commission expires:._ yd/z-?-// 7- GHBISTINE REESOR NotSryRoblic • CbMMlaNV/EAiiH.OF MSSACHUSETTS " MyCommlssidnExplrw Octobfir v. M17 : • - 1 I V. 2 I Pa g e 6/15/2017 V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, Inventor of Email - Know The Truth, Be The Light. -
1 January 20, 2021 Attorney Grievance Committee Supreme
January 20, 2021 Attorney Grievance Committee Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 401-0800 Email: [email protected] Re: Professional Responsibility Investigation of Rudolph W. Giuliani, Registration No. 1080498 Dear Members of the Committee: Lawyers Defending American Democracy (“LDAD”) is a non-profit, non-partisan organization the purpose of which is to foster adherence to the rule of law. LDAD’s open letters and statements calling for accountability on the part of public officials have garnered the support of 6,000 lawyers across the country, including many in New York.1 LDAD and the undersigned attorneys file this ethics complaint against Rudolph W. Giuliani because Mr. Giuliani has violated multiple provisions of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct while representing former President Donald Trump and the Trump Campaign. This complaint is about law, not politics. Lawyers have every right to represent their clients zealously and to engage in political speech. But they cross ethical boundaries—which are equally boundaries of New York law—when they invoke and abuse the judicial process, lie to third parties in the course of representing clients, or engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in or out of court. By these standards, Mr. Giuliani’s conduct should be investigated, and he should be sanctioned immediately while the Committee investigates. As lead counsel for Mr. Trump in all election matters, Mr. Giuliani has spearheaded a nationwide public campaign to convince the public and the courts of massive voter fraud and a stolen presidential election. -
Rudy Giuliani Speech Transcript
Rudy Giuliani Speech Transcript Voltaire sop allegorically? Distributed Mackenzie reflows some toxicologists and cusses his divas so woozily! Puffier or cany, Che never take-offs any blueweed! Fbi agent of need george floyd in scandals and rudy giuliani told me right now texans face of my wife cheating on the focus groups The suit traces the drawn-out effort will Trump and Giuliani to considerable doubt on. What you can have receded into a fake your email to lift the obituary and individual that it has opened an adult bookstore. Over the here of roughly five hours Wednesday Rudy Giuliani personal attorney for President Donald Trump and behavior people really brought. Michael bacall will not doing anything that all decent people who also heard from any time in instead, very unprofessional of transcripts do with supporters. President Donald Trump's personal attorney Rudy Guiliani told Fox Friends Wednesday morning shift he had access leaving the den of the. It called by pointing to talk to. To prod some political allies such as Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie. In simple to Ukraine in any past two years he's given speeches and done. Even make sure your needs to lift the transcript to prove it that? Candidate Speeches 200 Election ProConorg. Remarks by The Honorable Rudy Giuliani former beast of the quality of New York as prepared for delivery at the 2004 Republican National. Transcript Shows Donald Trump Asked Ukrainian President. Appearing in person with how Trump attorney Jenna Ellis former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani the president's personal attorney. -
Midterm Election Poll of Registered Voters
Toplines: November 2018 University of Massachusetts Amherst Post- Midterm Election Poll of Registered Voters Field Dates: November 7 - November 14, 2018 Sample: 750 Registered Voters in Massachusetts Margin of Error: 4.1% for Registered Voters YouGov interviewed 796 respondents who were then matched down to a sample of 750 to produce the final dataset. The respondents were matched to a sampling frame on gender, age, race, and education. The frame was constructed by stratified sampling from the Massachusetts portion of the 2016 Current Population Survey (CPS) with selection within strata by weighted sampling with replacements (using the person weights on the public use file). The matched cases were weighted to the sampling frame using propensity scores. The matched cases and the frame were combined, and a logistic regression was estimated for inclusion in the frame. The propensity score function included age, gender, race/ethnicity, years of education, and region. The propensity scores were grouped into deciles of the estimated propensity score in the frame and post-stratified according to these deciles. All figures presented in this document are for registered adults. UMass Poll Directors/Fellows Prof. Tatishe M. Nteta, Ph.D. – Director [email protected] Prof. Raymond La Raja, Ph.D. – Associate Director [email protected] Prof. Jesse Rhodes, Ph.D. – Associate Director [email protected] Kaylee Johnson, Research Fellow [email protected] Midterm Voter Turnout (N=750) Did you vote in the midterm election that ended on Tuesday, November 6th? Yes, I definitely voted in the midterm election 92% I did not vote in the election this November. -
Rtk 2020-204
November 24, 2020 VIA EMAIL Laura Dennis, Esquire Luzerne County Office of Law 200 North River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 [email protected] Luzerne County Board of Elections Luzerne County Courthouse 200 North River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 [email protected] Re: Right-to-Know Law Request Dear Ms. Dennis; Pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), as codified at 65 P.S. §§ 67.101 et seq., American Oversight makes the following request for records. On November 23, 2020, boards of election in several of the Pennsylvania’s most populous counties voted in favor of certifying their election results but split votes along partisan lines, with Republican minorities opposing certification.1 American Oversight requests records with the potential to shed light on the conduct of county elections officials, including whether or to what extent officials may have acted at the behest of external political interests. Requested Records American Oversight requests that the Luzerne County Board of Elections produce the following records within five business days: All email communications (email messages, email attachments, complete email chains) between (a) Luzerne County Board of Elections Secretary Keith Gould, or Board Member Joyce Dombroski-Gebhardt, from their official email addresses, or from personal emails in an official capacity, and (b) any of the following external parties: 1 Jeremy Roebuck & Jonathan Lai, Pennsylvania Counties Certify Election Results Despite Isolated Pushback from Trump Allies, Philadelphia Inquirer (updated Nov. 23, 2020, 7:01 PM), https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/pennsylvania-certification-election- results-third-circuit-trump-counties-20201123.html. 1030 15th Street NW, Suite B255, Washington, DC 20005 | AmericanOversight.org External Parties: 1. -
Topline Document Which Includes Likely Voter Model Questions and Wording
Dr. Joshua J. Dyck and Dr. Francis Talty, Co-Directors http://www.uml.edu/polls @UML_CPO _____________________________________________________________________________________________ UMass Lowell/Boston Globe Survey of Massachusetts Voters Survey produced by Professor Joshua J. Dyck, Ph.D and Professor John Cluverius, Ph. D. Field Dates: October 1-7, 2018 N=791 Massachusetts Registered Voters N=485 Massachusetts Likely Voters Adjusted Margin of Error: +/- 4.4% RVs Adjusted Margin of Error: +/- 5.6% LVs Margins of error have been adjusted to include for design effects resulting from weighting and survey design features. Methodology in Brief Data collection by live interviewers from SSRS. Thi s is a probability sample of 791 Massachusetts Registered Voters (RVs) collected using an overlapping dual -frame random digit dial design with a 50% landline/50% cell phone target split. Using the method detailed on page 2, we classified 485 RVs as Likely Voters (LVs). The data were first weighted to address the imbalance that occurs because some respondents have a greater probability of being included in the frame if they have multiple landlines or both a landline and a cellular number. To ensure a representative sample, we collected demographic d ata on all respondents who were residents of Massachusetts and at least 18 years of age (including non-registered voters) so that our overall sample ca n be weighted to data on age, gender, education, race and region from the 2018 American Community Survey for Massachusetts. UMass Lowell is a public institution and releases surveys as a source of public information. We report our questionnaire in our topline document which includes likely voter model questions and wording. -
Report to the Nation 2019
REPORT TO THE NATION: 2019 FACTBOOK ON HATE & EXTREMISM IN THE U.S. & INTERNATIONALLY TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................3 Executive Summary: Report to the Nation, 2019…………………………………………………………………......................5–95 I. LATEST 2018 MAJOR U.S. CITY DATA………………………………………………………………………......................5 II. BIAS BY CITY IN 2018…………………………………………………………………......................................................6 III: 2019/2018 Latest Major U.S. City Trends: By City & Bias Motive………………………………………..................7 IV: OFFICIAL FBI & BJS DATA………………………………… ……………………………………………..........................12 V: EXTREMIST AND MASS HOMICIDES……………………………………………...................................................18 VI: HATE MIGRATES AND INCREASES ONLINE……………………………………………………………....................22 VII: RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION CONTINUES…………………………………………….................29 VIII: FLUCTUATIONS AROUND CATALYTIC EVENTS AND POLITICS……………………………………..............32 IX: U.S. NGO DATA OVERVIEW – EXTREMIST GROUPS………………………………………….………..................38 X: U.S. NGO DATA – RELIGION & ETHNIC HATE …………………………………….............................................39 XI: U.S. NGO DATA – EMERGING HATREDS: HOMELESS, TRANSGENDER & JOURNALISTS ……….........44 XII: POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND THREATS………………………………………………………………….....................48 XIII: HATE CRIME VICTIMS AND OFFENDERS…………………………………………………..…………....................54 XIV: HATE CRIME PROSECUTIONS……………………………………………………………………………....................61 XV: HATE -
IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and DOMINION
Case 1:21-cv-02130-CJN Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 213 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION ) c/o Cogency Global ) 1025 Vermont Ave, NW, Ste. 1130 ) Washington, DC 20005, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) HERRING NETWORKS, INC., d/b/a ) ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK ) 101 Constitution Ave., NW ) Washington, DC 20001, ) ) CHARLES HERRING ) 17353 Circa Oriente ) Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067, ) ) ROBERT HERRING, SR. ) 4289 Rancho Las Brisas Trail ) San Diego, California 92130, ) ) CHANEL RION ) 3211 Cherry Hill Lane, NW ) Washington, DC 20007, ) ) and ) ) CHRISTINA BOBB ) 565 Pennsylvania Ave., NW ) Apt. 803 ) Washington, DC 20001, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case 1:21-cv-02130-CJN Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 213 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL April 18, 2021: “‘The majority of people [at OAN] did not believe the voter fraud claims being run on the air.’ . Mr. Golingan, the producer, said some OAN employees had hoped Dominion would sue the channel. ‘A lot of people said, “This is insane, and maybe if they sue us, we’ll stop putting stories like this out,”’ he said.” Former OAN Producer Marty Golingan, quoted in the New York times, and fired by OAN the day after the statements were published 1. On the actual facts, the November 2020 election was a huge success for Dominion. In jurisdiction after jurisdiction, in 28 states, in the midst of a highly disruptive pandemic, Dominion’s voting machines facilitated efficient and reliable voting with accurate tallying of votes. -
AYYADURAI V. FLOOR64, INC
03/02/2020 AYYADURAI v. FLOOR64, INC | 270 F.Supp.3d 343... | 20170907d75| Leagle.com Home / Browse Decisions / F.Supp.3d / 270 F.Supp.3d / 270 F.Supp.3d 343 (2017) AYYADURAI v. FLOOR64, INC. Civil Action No. 17-10011-FDS. Email | Print | Comments (0) View Case Cited Cases 270 F.Supp.3d 343 (2017) Shiva AYYADURAI, Plainti, v. FLOOR64, INC. d/b/a Techdirt, Michael David Masnick, Leigh Beadon, and Does 1-20, Defendants. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. Signed September 6, 2017. Editors Note Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Libel,Assault,Slander Nature of Suit: 320 Assault Libel & Slander Source: PACER Attorney(s) appearing for the Case Charles J. Harder , Pro Hac Vice, Douglas E. Mirell , Pro Hac Vice, Ryan J. Stonerock , Pro Hac Vice, Harder Mirell & Abrams LLP, Beverly Hills, CA, Timothy M. Cornell , Cornell Dolan, P.C., Boston, MA, for Plainti. Robert A. Bertsche , Jerey Jackson Pyle , Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE F. Dennis Saylor, IV, United States District Judge. This is a tort action arising out of allegedly defamatory statements that the plainti falsely claimed to be the inventor of e-mail. Plainti Shiva Ayyadurai is a scientist and entrepreneur. In 1979, at the age of 14, he created an electronic-mail system for use at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. On the basis of that creation, he has since claimed to have invented e-mail, and has received some positive media attention on the basis of that claim. -
In the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 105-1 Filed 05/19/21 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Dr. SHIVA AYYADURAI, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN, MICHELLE K. TASSINARI, DEBRA O’MALLEY, AMY COHEN, Case No. 1:20-CV-11889-MLW NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ELECTION DIRECTORS, all in their individual capacities, and WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for Massachusetts, Defendant. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS Case 1:20-cv-11889-MLW Document 105-1 Filed 05/19/21 Page 2 of 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i Table of Authorities ........................................................................................................................ ii Corporate Disclosure Statement ..................................................................................................... 1 Interest of Amicus Curiae ............................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Argument ................................................................................................................... 2 Argument ........................................................................................................................................ 3 I. Election Disinformation Threatens Election Officials, Election Workers, -
ELECTION FRAUD TRUTH SUMMIT ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ Election Fraud - Special Report 3.117 CLEARED for RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle Plantm Points: 200)
APPROVED FOR DISTRIBUTION ELECTION FRAUD TRUTH SUMMIT ECONOMIC BATTLE PLAN™ Election Fraud - special Report 3.117 CLEARED FOR RELEASE 12/08/2020 [Economic Battle PlanTM points: 200) Election Fraud Truth Summit Special Report – In partnership with the Citizen Coalition EveryLegalVote.com Your Economic Battle Plan™ today has a very special topic and a very special purpose. The election of 2020 is one of the biggest economic battles we have faced as Americans. Literally trillions of dollars are at stake and in the end, it is your money. Foreign governments, corrupt bureaucrats, crony capitalists and the Deep State all have a vested interest in getting the outcome they want. They win. You lose. Unless we do something and take a stand now. This is a TAKE ACTION briefing to protect your money, your livelihood, and your way of life. Your Briefing Today Will: • Walk through the irregularities of the 2020 election. • Provide a new resources where you can learn more about fair elections. • Introduce you to the people on the front lines fighting this battle. • Expose those who want to steal from you, including foreign interference. • Debunk the debunkers. • Show you the truth. • Give you actions you can take to protect our Constitution and stand for election integrity. “Anyone who says the 2020 election was normal or says, ‘nothing to see here’ is LYING TO YOU and we will prove it.”–Kevin Freeman Your Mission: 1. To take action, hold the line for Election Integrity, and understand the real fraud taking place in US elections. 2. To encourage Attorney General William Barr to ‘Do His Job’ as it relates to investigating election fraud and ensuring election integrity.