DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL COMMUNIQUE at the Invitation of H.E. Alassane Ouattara

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL COMMUNIQUE at the Invitation of H.E. Alassane Ouattara COMUNIDADE DOS ESTADOS DA AFRICA DO OESTE ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF COMMUNAUTE ECONOMIQUE WEST AFRICAN STATES DES ETATS DE L’AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST EXTRAORDINARY SUMMIT OF ECOWAS HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, 26 avril 2012 FINAL COMMUNIQUE 1. At the invitation of H.E. Alassane Ouattara, President of the Republic of Cote d’Ivoire and Chairman of ECOWAS, the Authority of Heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) held an Extraordinary Session in Abidjan, Republic Cote d’Ivoire, on 26 April 2012. 2. The Summit was convened to examine the political, security, and humanitarian situations in Mali and Guinea Bissau. 3. The following Heads of State and Government or their accredited representatives attended the Summit: His Excellency Thomas Boni YAYI President of the Republic of Benin His Excellency Blaise COMPAORE President of Burkina Faso His Excellency Jorge Carlos FONSECA President of the Republic of Cape Verde His Excellency Alassane OUATTARA President of the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire His Excellency Sheikh Prof. Alh. Yahya A.J.J. JAMMEH President of the Republic of The Gambia His Excellency Alpha CONDE President of the Republic of Guinea His Excellency Dioncounda TRAORE Interim President of the Republic of Mali His Excellency Goodluck Ebele JONATHAN President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria His Excellency Macky SALL President of the Republic of Senegal His Excellency Faure Essozimna GNASSINGBE President of the Togolese Republic His Excellency Brigi RAFINI Prime Minister of the Republic of Niger His Excellency Alhaji Mohamed MUMUNI Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Ghana His Excellency Augustine Kpehe NGAFUAN Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Liberia His Excellency Joseph B. DAUDA Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Sierra Leone 4. The representatives of the following States and Organizations also participated in the Summit as observers: 2 H.E. Mohamed Abdel Ould Aziz, President of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania Algeria France United States of America (USA) The African Union (AU) The West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) The United Nations Organization (UNO) The European Union (EU) 5. The Heads of State and Government took note of the reports by the President of the ECOWAS Commission on the latest political and security situations in Mali and Guinea Bissau, and the Chairman of the Committee of Chiefs of Defense Staff on the latest state of preparedness of the ECOWAS Standby Force. They also took note of the briefings by H.E. Blaise Compaoré, President of Faso and ECOWAS Mediator in Mali, and H.E. Alpha Condé, President of Guinea and ECOWAS Mediator in Guinea Bissau. 6. Summit recalled the Statement of 6 April 2012 by the Chairman of Authority on the signing of the Framework Agreement by the stakeholders in the constitutional crisis in Mali, as well as the Statements of 12 and 19 April 2012 by the President of the ECOWAS Commission, following the coup d’état in Guinea Bissau and the establishment of the purported National Transitional Council by the Military Command, respectively. 7. After exhaustive deliberations on the situations in Mali and Guinea Bissau, Summit took the following decisions: On the Restoration of Constitutional Order in Mali: 8. Authority takes note of the “Solemn Commitment” taken by the Comité National de Redressement pour la Démocratie et la Restauration de l‘Etat (CNRDRE) on 01 April 2012 to speedily restore constitutional legality in Mali. 3 9. Summit welcomes the signing of the “Framework Agreement on the Implementation of the Solemn Commitment” on 6 April 2012 by the stakeholders in the constitutional crisis under the auspices of the ECOWAS Mediator, H.E. Blaise Compaoré, President of Faso, and warmly congratulates him on the significant breakthrough. 10. Summit takes note the establishment of the transitional organs under the Framework Agreement, in particular the nomination of the Interim President, of the Prime Minister and the cabinet, and commends the Malian population and their leaders for demonstrating an admirable capacity for self-sacrifice in the interest of the unity and integrity of the Nation. 11. Authority decides to limit the transition in Mali to a period of twelve months within which, a Presidential election shall be organized to choose a new president. Authority also decides to extend the mandate of the transitional organs notably the Interim President, the Prime Minister and the Cabinet, by the same twelve-month period to ensure, within the limits of powers conferred on each under the Constitution, the continuity of governance in the country. 12. Summit urges all the stakeholders concerned to commit to the faithful implementation of the roadmap until the holding of the Presidential election and the restoration of the unity and territorial integrity of Mali. Authority demands that the transitional authority guarantees the right of return to Mali of the ex-President, Mr. Amadou Toumani Touré, and all other personalities forced to leave the country, as well as their safety and security while in the country. 13. Summit exhorts the transitional authority to take all necessary measures to deploy central administrative organs and services throughout the country, particularly in the north, within the transitional period. 14. Summit welcomes the release of the Malian personalities detained by the military on 17 April 2012, and demands that the CNRDRE strictly fulfill its commitment under the Agreement by respecting the constitutional order 4 and submitting to civilian authority under the Transition. In this regard, Authority demands the return of members of CNRDRE to the barracks to concentrate on their core duties of defending the territory of Mali. 15. Authority cautions members of the CNRDRE that any further arbitrary and unilateral action on their part in the course of the transition shall be met with the imposition of targeted individual sanctions on the perpetrators. 16. Summit expresses gratitude to the six Heads of State designated by ECOWAS to monitor the crisis in Mali, the core countries (Algeria and Mauritania), the African Union, the United Nations and Development Partners, for their cooperation in the process to restore constitutional order in Mali. On the Rebellion in the North of Mali 17. Summit notes with concern that, despite the so-called declaration of unilateral cease-fire by the MNLA on 5 April 2012, the rebels, terrorist cells, and other transnational organized criminal networks, continue to perpetrate atrocities in the north of Mali, transforming the occupied territory into a zone of banditry and acute insecurity with dire humanitarian consequences. 18. Authority denounces the continued occupation of the regions of Kidal, Gao and Timbuktu by the rebels, reaffirms its commitment to the unity and territorial integrity of Mali, and reiterates its determination to assist the Government of Mali in reestablishing its sovereignty over the entire territory, in accordance with the relevant ECOWAS Protocols. 19. Authority reaffirms the offer of its mediation for a negotiated settlement of the crisis in the north of Mali. In this regard, Authority renews its confidence in the Mediator, H.E. Blaise Compaoré, and encourages him to persevere in his mediation efforts in collaboration with the core countries (Algeria and Mauritania) until the restoration of the unity and territorial integrity of Mali is achieved. 5 20. Authority welcomes and endorses the wish expressed by H. E. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, to join the Mediator, H. E. Blaise Compaore, in the efforts to find a peaceful solution to the crisis in Mali. 21. Authority decides to take all other necessary measures to assist Mali in regaining its unity and territorial integrity. In this regard, Authority instructs the Commission to commence, with immediate effect, the deployment of the ECOWAS Standby Force in Mali, in line with the approved Mandate. 22. Summit reaffirms its commitment to assist Mali and the neighboring Member States in responding to the humanitarian consequences of the rebellion. In that regard, Summit instructs the Commission to take all necessary measures to mobilize resources to provide relief to the affected populations and to protect humanitarian corridors, as well as relief supplies and humanitarian actors, in consultation and cooperation with the core countries and the partners. Summit instructs the Commission to set aside an amount, to be determined, as initial working capital, in accordance with the report of Committee of Chiefs of Defense Staff. 23. Summit expresses its gratitude to the Development Partners that have pledged financial, technical, and logistical support to the ECOWAS humanitarian and mediation efforts in Mali, and calls on humanitarian agencies and the international community to intensify their assistance in this regard. 24. Authority calls on all States, especially the non-ECOWAS core countries, and partners wishing to support ECOWAS in the efforts to restore constitutional order and territorial integrity of Mali. In this regard, Authority instructs the Commission to put in place a mechanism for consultation and coordination with partners for the mobilization of support towards to this end. 6 On the Political and Security Situation in Guinea Bissau 25. Authority reaffirms the fundamental principle of “Zero Tolerance” for power obtained or maintained by unconstitutional means, as well as the role of the military in a Democracy, as enshrined in the Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance. 26. Summit firmly condemns the coup d’état of 12 April 2012 in Guinea Bissau by the Military Command and its civilian associates, and denounces the disruption of the Presidential electoral process, as well as the detention of the Prime Minister and the Interim President by the Junta. 27. Authority reiterates the ECOWAS denunciation of the 17 April 2012 Agreement establishing the so-called National Transitional Council, and reaffirms that ECOWAS will never recognize any unconstitutional transitional arrangement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Côte D'ivoire
    CÔTE D’IVOIRE COI Compilation August 2017 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire COI Compilation August 2017 This report collates country of origin information (COI) on Côte d’Ivoire up to 15 August 2017 on issues of relevance in refugee status determination for Ivorian nationals. The report is based on publicly available information, studies and commentaries. It is illustrative, but is neither exhaustive of information available in the public domain nor intended to be a general report on human-rights conditions. The report is not conclusive as to the merits of any individual refugee claim. All sources are cited and fully referenced. Users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa Immeuble FAALO Almadies, Route du King Fahd Palace Dakar, Senegal - BP 3125 Phone: +221 33 867 62 07 Kora.unhcr.org - www.unhcr.org Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 4 1 General Information ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Historical background ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis in Côte D'ivoire Justin Vaïsse, the Brookings Institution
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-2188 Tel: 202-797-6000 Fax: 202-797-6004 Divi www.brookings.edu U.S.-FRANCE ANALYSIS SERIES March 2003 The Crisis in Côte d'Ivoire Justin Vaïsse, The Brookings Institution For nearly thirty years after its independence from France in 1960, Côte d'Ivoire presented a rare example of growth and stability in the often-troubled region of West Africa. Now, after fifteen years of economic downturn and three years of political turmoil, Côte d'Ivoire is in the midst of a full-fledged crisis. A new phase of the crisis began in September 2002 when a mutiny erupted in the administrative capital of Abidjan, while rebels in the north seized the cities of Bouaké and Korhogo. They eventually took control of the entire northern part of the country and have the potential, if unsatisfied by political progress, to someday march on Abidjan. (See map). France, the former colonial power, sent reinforcements for the 600 French troops already present in the country under a permanent defense agreement to help protect western African populations and to monitor a cease-fire between the rebels and the government. Center on the United For more briefs in the U.S.-France Analysis Series, see States and France http://www.brookings.edu/usfrance/analysis/index.htm In January 2003, the French government organized peace talks between the Ivorian government, the rebel groups and all political parties, resulting in the Marcoussis Agreements.1 These agreements call for a “reconciliation government” that would include rebels under the leadership of a new prime minister and for the settlement of long-standing issues including access to Ivorian nationality, rules of eligibility and land ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire Country Focus
    European Asylum Support Office Côte d’Ivoire Country Focus Country of Origin Information Report June 2019 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Côte d’Ivoire Country Focus Country of Origin Information Report June 2019 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9476-993-0 doi: 10.2847/055205 © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2019 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © Mariam Dembélé, Abidjan (December 2016) CÔTE D’IVOIRE: COUNTRY FOCUS - EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT — 3 Acknowledgements EASO acknowledges as the co-drafters of this report: Italy, Ministry of the Interior, National Commission for the Right of Asylum, International and EU Affairs, COI unit Switzerland, State Secretariat for Migration (SEM), Division Analysis The following departments reviewed this report, together with EASO: France, Office Français de Protection des Réfugiés et Apatrides (OFPRA), Division de l'Information, de la Documentation et des Recherches (DIDR) Norway, Landinfo The Netherlands, Immigration and Naturalisation Service, Office for Country of Origin Information and Language Analysis (OCILA) Dr Marie Miran-Guyon, Lecturer at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), researcher, and author of numerous publications on the country reviewed this report. It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of Laurent Gbagbo and Charles Blé Goudé at the ICC
    Open Society Justice Initiative BRIEFING PAPER The Trial of Laurent Gbagbo and Charles Blé Goudé at the ICC JAJ January 2016 Laurent Koudou Gbagbo, former president of Côte d’Ivoire, faces charges at the ICC for crimes against humanity committed in the aftermath of contested presidential elections in 2010. Charles Blé Goudé, Gbagbo’s Youth Minister and long-time supporter, is facing similar charges. The two will be tried together before the ICC for allegedly conspiring to keep Gbagbo in office by any means necessary—including by committing crimes against humanity. 224 West 57th Street, New York, New York, 10019, United States | TEL +1-212-548-0600 | FAX +1-212-548-4662 | [email protected] BRIEFING PAPER GBAGBO AND BLÉ GOUDÉ 2 The Defendants Laurent Koudou Gbagbo is the former president of Côte d’Ivoire. Prior to assuming the presidency in 2000, Gbagbo was a historian and a political dissident. After secretly founding the Front Populaire Ivoirien (Ivorian Popular Front (FPI)) as an opposition party to President Felix Houphouët-Boigny’s one-party rule, Gbagbo spent most of the 1980s in exile in France. Gbagbo returned to Côte d’Ivoire in 1988 to compete against incumbent Houphouet-Boigny in the 1990 presidential race, the country’s first multi-party elections. Though defeated for the presidency, Gbagbo later won a seat in the National Assembly. Amid ongoing political and ethnic unrest throughout Côte d’Ivoire, Gbagbo won the highly contentious and violent 2000 Ivorian presidential elections. Gbagbo remained president until 2010, when he was defeated in a highly contentious presidential election by Alassane Ouattara.
    [Show full text]
  • Cote D'ivoire 2020 Human Rights Report
    COTE D’IVOIRE 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cote d’Ivoire is a democratic republic governed by a president re-elected in October under conditions generally considered free, although some international observers questioned the fairness of the overall electoral process. Ahead of the country’s October 31 presidential election, civil society and international human rights organizations alleged infringements on rights to assembly and expression and at least two reported instances of unregulated non-state-actor violence against protesters. Also prior to the election, opposition leaders challenged the legality of President Alassane Ouattara’s candidacy for a third term; however, the institution charged with validating candidate eligibility, the Constitutional Council, approved his candidacy on September 14. International election observers differed in their overall assessments of the election. Some found the process to be overall satisfactory while others concluded it did not allow for genuine competition. The Constitutional Council, which the constitution empowers to certify the results of elections, validated the incumbent president’s re-election on November 9. The country’s first ever senatorial elections in 2018 were peaceful. The National Police, which reports to the Ministry of the Interior and Security, and the National Gendarmerie, which reports to the Ministry of Defense, are responsible for domestic law enforcement. The Coordination Center for Operational Decisions, a mixed unit of police, gendarmerie, and Armed Forces of Cote d’Ivoire personnel, assisted police in providing security in some large cities. The Armed Forces of Cote d’Ivoire, which report to the Ministry of Defense, are responsible for national defense. The Directorate of Territorial Surveillance, under the Ministry of Security and Civil Protection, is responsible for countering internal threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Tensions Entre Le Ghana Et La Côte D'ivoire. Opposants Ivoiriens À
    Notes de l’Ifri Tensions entre le Ghana et la Côte d’Ivoire Opposants ivoiriens à Accra et enjeux pétroliers à la frontière maritime Benjamin AUGÉ Janvier 2018 Programme Afrique subsaharienne L’Ifri est, en France, le principal centre indépendant de recherche, d’information et de débat sur les grandes questions internationales. Créé en 1979 par Thierry de Montbrial, l’Ifri est une association reconnue d’utilité publique (loi de 1901). Il n’est soumis à aucune tutelle administrative, définit librement ses activités et publie régulièrement ses travaux. L’Ifri associe, au travers de ses études et de ses débats, dans une démarche interdisciplinaire, décideurs politiques et experts à l’échelle internationale. Les opinions exprimées dans ce texte n’engagent que la responsabilité de l’auteur. ISBN : 978-2-36567-826-1 © Tous droits réservés, Ifri, 2018 Comment citer cette publication : Benjamin Augé, « Tensions entre le Ghana et la Côte d’Ivoire. Opposants ivoiriens à Accra et enjeux pétroliers à la frontière maritime », Notes de l’Ifri, Ifri, janvier 2018. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE Tél. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 – Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 E-mail : [email protected] Site internet : Ifri.org Auteur Chercheur associé à l’Ifri, Benjamin Augé est docteur en géographie de l’Institut français de géopolitique (université Paris 8), il est par ailleurs le rédacteur en chef de la lettre d’information Africa Energy Intelligence (groupe Indigo Publications). Il enseigne la géopolitique du pétrole et du gaz en Afrique au sein de l’Executive Master in Energy and Natural Resources d’Hamad Ben Khalifa University – HEC/Georgetown University/Texas A&M – au Qatar ainsi qu’à l’université de Nouakchott en Mauritanie et à l’Instituto Nacional de Relacoes Internationais (ISRI) au Mozambique.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem on the Brink
    February 2011 Noref Article Africa and the Ivory Coast: a time for decision Makau Mutua Summary The normal role of elections in creating stability A basic principle of democracy is that elections and entrenching the state’s legitimacy is being should both create political stability and bestow undermined in Ivory Coast. There, the clear legitimacy on the state under which they are result of the presidential election runoff in conducted. Where a number of African states are November 2010 was the defeat of the incumbent concerned, however, elections have in practice Laurent Gbagbo by the opposition candidate had an opposite and perverse effect. Kenya and Alassane Ouattara. But Gbagbo refuses to Zimbabwe, where contested or stolen elections accept the verdict, which has been endorsed by have brought society to the brink of catastrophe the country’s independent electoral commission or collapse, are two examples. Now, another post- as well as the international community. The election nightmare is unfolding on the continent: in resulting standoff places a great responsibility on Ivory Coast, where the outcome of the presidential two regional bodies, the African Union (AU) and election runoff on 28 November 2010 could yet the Economic Community of West African States lead the country to break up into two. (Ecowas). Their initial unified response has been complicated by Ghana’s subsequent opposition to The vote appears to have had a clear result: the the use of force against Gbagbo. But Nigeria has defeat, by a margin of 46% to 54%, of Laurent been firm in pressing Gbagbo to step down, and Gbagbo, the incumbent strongman who has ruled could still play the pivotal role in efforts to install the Ivory Coast since 2000, to opposition leader Ouattara, the rightful victor.
    [Show full text]
  • Cote D'ivoire Post-Gbagbo
    Côte d’Ivoire Post-Gbagbo: Crisis Recovery Nicolas Cook Specialist in African Affairs April 20, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21989 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Cote d'Ivoire’s Post-Election Crisis Summary Côte d’Ivoire is emerging from a severe political crisis that followed a disputed November 28, 2010, presidential runoff election between former president Laurent Gbagbo and his, former Prime Minister Alassane Ouattara. Both claimed electoral victory and formed opposing governments. Their rivalry spurred a full-scale civil military conflict in early March 2011, after months of growing political violence. The main conflict died down days after Gbagbo’s arrest by pro-Ouattara forces, aided by United Nations (U.N.) and French peacekeepers, but limited residual fighting was continuing to occur as of April 20. The election was designed to cap an often forestalled peace process defined by the 2007 Ouagadougou Political Agreement, the most recent in a series of partially implemented peace accords aimed at reunifying the country, which was divided between a government-controlled southern region and a rebel-controlled northern zone after a brief civil war in 2002. Ouattara based his victory claim on the U.N.-certified runoff results announced by the Ivoirian Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). These indicated that he had won the election with a 54.1% vote share, against 45.9% for Gbagbo. The international community, including the United States, endorsed the IEC-announced poll results as legitimate and demanded that Gbagbo cede the presidency to Ouattara. Gbagbo, rejecting the IEC decision, appealed it to the Ivoirian Constitutional Council, which reviewed and annulled it and proclaimed Gbagbo president, with 51.5% of votes against 48.6% for Ouattara.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOWAS's Right to Intervene in CôTe D'ivoire to Install Alassane
    Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 3 10-1-2013 ECOWAS's Right to Intervene in Côte D'Ivoire to Install Alassane Ouattara as President-Elect Julie Dubé Gagnon Lawyers Without Borders Canada Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Gagnon, Julie Dubé (2013) "ECOWAS's Right to Intervene in Côte D'Ivoire to Install Alassane Ouattara as President-Elect," Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl/vol3/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 51 NOTRE DAME JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW 2013 ECOWAS’S RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN CÔTE D’IVOIRE TO INSTALL ALASSANE OUATTARA AS PRESIDENT-ELECT Julie Dubé Gagnon On January 6, 2011, President-elect Alassane Ouattara of Côte d’Ivoire requested the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to intervene in order to remove incumbent Laurent Gbagbo, who refused to leave power following the democratic presidential elections of November 2010. In December 2010, ECOWAS gave a final ultimatum to Laurent Gbagbo to comply with its request on ceding his throne. Otherwise, ECOWAS warned, it would be compelled to use legitimate force to serve the demands of the Ivorian people. This Article ascertains the illegality of a military intervention for pro-democratic motives in light of the current post- election crisis in Côte d’Ivoire.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Provisional Sixty-Sixth Year
    United Nations S/PV.6508 Security Council Provisional Sixty-sixth year 6508th meeting Wednesday, 30 March 2011, 5 p.m. New York President: Mr. Li Baodong .................................. (China) Members: Bosnia and Herzegovina ........................... Mr. Vukašinović Brazil ......................................... Mrs. Viotti Colombia ...................................... Mr. Osorio France ......................................... Mr. Araud Gabon ......................................... Mr. Messone Germany ....................................... Mr. Berger India .......................................... Mr. Hardeep Singh Puri Lebanon ....................................... Mr. Assaf Nigeria ........................................ Mrs. Ogwu Portugal ....................................... Mr. Moraes Cabral Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Churkin South Africa .................................... Mr. Sangqu United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .... Mr. Parham United States of America ........................... Ms. Rice Agenda The situation in Côte d’Ivoire This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of speeches delivered in the other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service,
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Ghana and Côte D'ivoire on Economic Development
    Keeping up with the Ghanaians: A Comparative Study of Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire on Economic Development Jizhou “Max” Zhang Department of Political Science Carleton College Northfield, Minnesota USA Abstract Two decades after the democratic transition in 1992, Ghana surpassed its neighboring country Côte d'Ivoire to be the second largest economy in West Africa. What contributed to Ghana’s development story or economic development in West African countries in general? This study compares the economic development of Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire, two similar West African countries with contrasting outcomes. The findings indicate that well established democratic political parties and long-term focused macroeconomic management are the essential factors driving healthy and sustained economic development in West African countries. Zhang 1 A decade ago, The Economist labeled Africa as “the hopeless continent.” Profound changes have taken place since then. Africa’s economies are consistently growing faster than those of almost any other regions of the world. The “lion economies,” just like the Asian tigers in the 1980s, are on the brink of an economic take-off with a rising middle class (The Economist, 2011). Ghana is one shining example of these Africa’s hopeful economies. Since the military strongman Jerry Rawlings returned the country to its people in 1992, the Ghanaian economy maintained stable growth for the following twenty years. In 2011, Ghana was the fastest growing economy in the world with an annual GDP growth rate of 14 percent. Economic development has not only shifted Ghana from a low-income country to a lower-middle income one, but has also made Ghana a shining example of economic development in West Africa (IMF: Ghana Article IV 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Four Commentaries by Alassane D. Ouattara
    Four Commentaries by Alassane D. Ouattara INTEGRATION AND GROWTH IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD ECONOMY International Monetary Fund Washington D.C., September 1999 ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution Cover design: Luisa Menjivar-Macdonald Composition: Julio R. Prego ISBN 1-55775-847-6 To order additional copies of this publication, contact: International Monetary Fund, Publication Services 700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431, U.S.A. Tel: (202) 623-7430 Telefax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.imf.org ii ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution Contents Foreword v Better Integration into an Increasingly Globalized Economy 1 Africa: An Agenda for the Twenty-First Century 9 Political Dimensions of Economic Reforms 25 Regional Integration in Africa: An Important Step Toward Global Integration 37 iii ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution This page intentionally left blank ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution Foreword For countries the world over, development is taking place in a new context. Globalized and integrated financial markets are now the norm, complete with their tremendous opportunities—the chance to quicken the pace of investment, job creation, and growth—and, of course, some inevitable risks. As the 1997-98 financial crisis in Asia brought home, countries can no longer oper- ate in isolation; those with good economic policies stand to be rewarded by the markets, but those with poor policies must bear the consequences. How should countries navigate these new uncharted waters? That is the question that lies at the heart of the new policy debate—a debate that is punctuated with terms such as transparency, account- ability, good governance, consensus, participation, and above all, solidarity.
    [Show full text]