<<

The British Comprehensive Secondary :

An Instrument for Social Reform?

Robert M. Martin

During the past two decades an evolution has been in industrial cities like Bristol, Coventry, and London, taking place in British . And nowhere is that more where a combination of extensive war damage lo existing evident than at the level. Herc the com­ school buildings, and the presence of Labour Party Councils prehensive-type school has been assuming configuration have been additional causative factors. The nine with clear-cut functions. An examination of this educa­ visited were: Ca1tlc Rushen School, Castletown, Isle of tional structure, so familiar to us, but new to British Man; Ruffwood School, Kirkby Estate, Lancashire; Sir schoolmcn and children can prove illuminating. Thomas Jones School, Amlwch, Anglesey, Wales; Church­ During the 1968-69 school year, tl1e writer visited nine fields School, West Bromwich, Birmingham; President schools recommended by the British Ministry of Educa­ Kennedy School, Coventry; Henbury School. Bristol; tion's Department of Education and Science as represen­ Alfred Col/ox School, Bridport, ; Thomas Bennett tative of the better comprehensive schools in Great Britain. School, Crawley, West Sussex; Wandsworth School, South· He came away with some deep and favorable impressions. fields Borough, London. 9 Two features, in fact, might serve as subjects for study by American educators with comparable procedures in our Background of the British own comprehensive secondary schools. First is the vertical Comprehensive Secondary School organization within each British school of sub-groups for American educators should not assume that the British educational, social and guidance direction. Called the Horue comprehensive secondary school is 11 direct transplant from Plan by the British, the Little School by Alexander (see the United States. Rather, it appears to be a response to a lead article) and The School within a School by such number of social and economic forces emergent in the School Systems as Portland, Oregon, it offers some chal­ since World War II. lenges to our existing counseling and guidance programs. Traditionally there have been three educational routes Here in Hawaii the new Kailua High School, with its pro· open to British children. Six per cent followed the prestig· jectcd 6,000 pupil enrollment, plans to incorporate the ious 'inner-track' from private preparatory school, through House Plan in its organization. a prestigious independent or 'public' school like Eton or Second, the "strong-Principal" concept, characteristic of Harrow to matriculation at 'Oxbridge' and an assured place all British schools, with its accompanying latitude regarding in the aristocratic society of . For a fourth of the budget control and curriculum determination of each children, local led to , if school. These will be discussed in greater detail later in this he passed the qualifying examination at age eleven. A article. second hurdle lay in the requirement of two or three The comprehensive secondary schools visited varied in advanced level passes as part of the GencraJ Certification of enrollment from 500 pupils in Castle Rushen School, Education, after which his goal was, and is, a provincial Castletown, Isle of Man, to more than 2,000 in Wandsworth . Failure here 'off-ramps' him to industry, or a tech­ School, London, and seem to have rooted best in the West nical college. The third route, followed by two-thirds of of England, Wales, and the Isle of Man. In England, with England's youth, who do not pass the 'eleven plus' exami­ some exceptions, the comprehensive-type institution is nation, may take them to secondary modem schools and being built in rural areas, in new centers-of-population, and then to work, at either age fifteen or sixteen. It might be said that the secondary modern schools, an outgrowth of "includes young people of secondary school age over the the 1944 Education Act, while numerous (5300), arc low in whole range of ability, as far us they can be educated in the quality of staff and facilities and, subsequently, in prestige. normal school at all. . . IL should be sufficiently large in Upward mobility in British society, with its non·contig­ enrollment, staff and facilities lo meet the needs of all the uous educational pathways, has been difficult; and il is pupils and still not so large that they lose a sense of belong· possible lo consider the comprehensive secondary school us ing and being individually looked after." (8 :p.l) a principal vehicle for social reform towards a more open An excellent and complete report on the comprehensive society, for reasons which will be discussed later in this by the Inner London Authority article. stales, "A is not merely unselcctive; In 1945, a Labour government a~umed office al the it is a school which differs from the grammar school and national, and most local levels. Pledged lo social reform, it the in that first, it does not look some steps toward broadening the base of secondary accept un entry which has been previously passed over, and education. Studies by national commissions and dissatisfac­ second, it docs not itself make selection." (9 :p.17) tion by educators with the segregated system of schools led As analyzed by Conant (1 :Intro.), the aim is to be able to experimentation with comprehensive secondary learning lo offer suitable preparation for either , or centers. In rural areas in Wales and on the Isle of Man, the world of work; or, for the individual who is undecided, where population is relatively sparse, general economics by permitting him to delay, as long as necessary, the need suggested a multi-purpose secondary type of school lo for making this choice. accommodate all children. London and Coventry, both All schools visited consisted of six forms (classes) and socialistic strongholds, deliberately fashioned school sys­ tended lo divide into three sub-groups: Forms I and II into tems capable of educating pupils of a11 background and a Lower School; Forms UI, IV and V into the Main School; aptitudes through the secondary school. and Form VI as a sort of sub-school for pupils primarily Additional causative factors included discontent with interested in further education beyond the secondary level. the existing Secondary Modern School, and a desire to Most comprehensive schools are coeducational, except 10 incorporate some industrial education into the general those in London, which have all three possible brroupings curriculum of secondary schools. Schoolmen came to real- for boys and girls. ize that only through open admission lo secondary schools Sroffing: British Government support lo education in terms could best use be made of the manpower pool wailing to be of staffing is far greater than is the case in the United educated. Probability tables, as we know, tell approxi­ States. A pupil-teacher ratio of 20-1 represents a national mately how many children will go on lo further academic norm, while in London, the formula calls for one teacher study, but they do not inform in advance just which chil­ for every 24 pupils under age 15 and one for every 18 dren these arc. pupils age fifteen and over. The Headmaster's Association Pervading it all was a desire, on the part of working­ recommends a ratio of 18-1 for schools of l,000 or more. class citizens, for equnl access to the fruits of this newly Headmasters visited were visibly shocked when told that affluent society in Britain. Continuing and equal edu­ 30-1 was a common situation in the United States. cational opportunity is seen as the principnl approach to its attainment. Adminutration: Another practice which might be of inter­ est to American school building administrators revolves What is the British about the discretionary powers given to the Headmaster by C.Omprehensive Secondary School? the Locnl Education Authority of each Borough, or Dis­ Because of its relative newness, it has been said, in lricl. To paraphrase one LEA official, their purpose is to Britain, that the comprehensive school is in danger of build schools, pay teachers and provide equipment and becoming something everybody knows about, but very few n materials. One is left with the impression that the Head­ understand. However, the organization and operation of master is expected to run the school. One should mention, this emerging institution can be described as having a strik­ however, that national guidelines, even though advisory in ing similarity to American comprehensive secondary nature, do influence both the LEAs and the Headmasters in schools. selling prob'l'ams for their institution. Budgets, once re­ The headmaster of a large London comprehensive school leased lo the Headmaster, are his to administer as he thinks (Elliott School) defines his type of school as one which best. An additional area of latitude not enjoyed by all American Principals is in Lhc hiring and utilizing of staff. It education, games, careers and, depending upon the organi­ is common practice for Hcadmaslcrs to utilize part-time zation of the school, House activities. The remedial 1,rroup Leachcrs (Pool teachers) as needed. The advantages of the will have most of the above, but with larger blocks of time head of a moderate-size school being able to call upon the for reading and arithmetic and diminished time for some special services of persons for part-time use in foreign lan­ other subjects. guage, drama, sporls, etc., conjures up immediate possibili­ At the end of the third year pupils may select either a Lies for us. It is estimated that approximaLcly 15-25 per one-year program if they plan to leave school at age LS, or a cent of school slaffs in British comprehensive schools arc two-year program leading to an external examination. Low Pool teachers. ability groups arc encouraged to plan their work around a series of integrated studies (President Kennedy School) Curriculum: The wrilcr noticed a curriculum emphasis involving English, mathematics, history, geography, art, upon academics Lhroughout. Shop subjects seemed lo be modern studies, science, heavy craft and home economics. considered as "broadening" for all students rather than as a For the faster students, a majority, there is a continuation separate course for Lcrminal students. One headmaster of their compulsory subjects: English, mathematics, physi­ admitted encouraging the lagging students to hit Lhe aca­ cal education, religious instruction, games and House activi­ demics harder, rather than giving up ccrlain examination ties, together with one option from each of several grouped goals and taking shop subjects. However, the larger schools subjects (called sets). localed in or near induslrial centers were shaping probrrams During the fifth year the proi,rram is usually similar lo for pupils planning entry into commerce and industry, the fourth, but there is a focusing upon the taking of cxtcr· although this seems not to be a predominant characteristic nal examinations, usually al ordinary level and one period a of British comprehensive secondary schools. week is devoted lo careers (sec section on careers). Evaluation of Pupil Progress: Academic educational goals of The Sixth Fonn students in comprehensive, as in grammar schools, appear The , an inheritance from the British Gram­ lo be Lowards successful performance on external examina· mar School, has no parallel in our American secondary 11 Lions. Whereas the American high school pupil builds blocks schools. Traditionally selective, it now increasingly signifies of Carnegie units lo be capped wilh the high school dip­ merely that a pupil has finished five forms or grades and is loma, his British counterpart marshalls his learning cfforls anxious to pursue study within a rather special sub-brroup in towards Lhe General Certificate of Education with passes at the school and at an academic level calculated to pre­ ordinary and hopefully advanced levels in appropriate pare him for , or for other personal subjects. satisfaction. Grouping: Like Americans Lhc British headmaster and his "It works within a distinctive curriculum pattern with staff arc concerned with determining the most effective and its own examination objective and with individualized desirable ways of grouping pupils for learning. They call time-table arrangements." (' :p.3) this "streaming" and Lhere seems to be a move away from It should b1: mentioned that pupils may spend two or early, narrow and permanent grouping towards more flexi­ even three years in the Sixth Form pursuing their cxamina· bility in changing groups. Lion goals without any loss of slatus. At Thomas Bennett Time Tables (Program of Studies) School, the Sixth Form included provisions for advanced Just as with the American comprehensive high school, studies in such terminal areas as business and commercial. the schools in Britain arc so varied in size and proi,rram Sixth Form offerings usually expand with enrollment. characteristics that it is not possible to do more than indi­ Pupils tend to divide into those groups preparing for Ordi­ cate some broad and general patterns that appeared in mosl nnry level examination subjects (0) and those preparing lo of the institutions visited by the writer. take Advanced level examinations (A), and arrangement of There is a common subject-matter content for all pupils these subjects into sets or groupings varies from school lo in the first two years of school- in the first three years in school. The intent is lo provide each pupil with a balance of some schools. Pupils arc grouped usually into three ability subjects from English, humanities, science, mathematics, "streams": fast, average, and remedial. The two lop groups foreign languages, economics, physical education, religious take English, French, history, mathcmalics, science, art, instruction, and in some cases, domestic science, technical crafts, home economics, religious instruction, physical drawing, and business. Admission lo the Sixth Form is based primarily on the desire of the pupil supported by ... The Houses arc certainly our most important fea­ evidence of his ability lo do Sixth Form work. ture, without which we must fail completely. Their small size permits a family conception, lo which we are devoted. Allocation lo a House is on these prin­ The House Plan and Pastoral Care ciples: families together; each of about half a dozen Herein we find a basically different a1•proach in our two very small villages has a particular House affiliation; countries to the problem of providing individual counseling the larger primary schools arc dispersed; each child and group guidance lo pupils in the school and Lo vertical nominates a friend lo be placed with him. (6 :p. l) grouping for social and instructional purposes. Pedley (1 1 : Perhaps a paraphrased description of lhe House system pp. 27-28) notes that the large American school has more of Hcnbury School from the bulletin of the school (12) will faith in specialist guidance, especially psycholobrical, than provide a picture of such a plan having actual physical facil­ the English. British schools rely upon the generalist in ities. Incidentally, Mr. P. J. Lugel, Headmaster of Hcnbury education for counseling; upon the administration for test was away in America at the time of the visit, studying administration, while abhorring the categorizing of pupils secondary schools in Havre, Montana. with psychological terminology. Holmes (p. 82) summarizes In this large school the House system has an importance it succinctly, "The danger, however, which was mentioned for in cxct.'SS of that to be found in a school of more moder­ earlier must be borne in mind, that it may be very unwise ate size and traditional pattern. Buildings A and B on the lo encourage an unusual or eccentric young person lo campus arc especially designed House Blocks, each con­ regard himself as psychologically disturbed and as a case for taining accommodations for three houses. analysis and special study." One remembers that the Each House Block contains its own kitchen and each English cherish their right lo be individuals and, particu­ House has at its disposal a large House room for the pur­ larly, to be eccentric about it. pose of assembly, dining and social activities, a classroom Briefly slated, the House Plan is an administrative device for 40 pupils, a large study for tutorial brroups up lo 20, and for dividing a school into manageable social and instruc­ a Houscmastcr's room. Also included arc a Staff room, 12 tional brroups. Usually developed on the vertical basis; that cloakrooms and toilets for staff and pupils within each is a pupil stays with the same House throughout his school Block. career, groups arc Conned somewhat heterogeneously on Children arc allocated to Houses al Hcnbury in their the basis of 250-300 pupils. In some of the newer schools second term at the school but do not enter the House sys­ the House groups have a physical base- one of the best tem proper until their third year. All first and second forms observed is at Henbury. This excellent institution gives or classes are accommodated in the Lower School Building this rationale for the House Plan in its booklet. whcrn they arc organized on a Form basis in order to "It is felt that it is essential that throughout their cushion their entry into a complex organization and the school career children should feel as individuals a better to prepare their transition later to the House system. growing relationship to a Housemaslcr, a corps of An a

I.Conant, James Bryant. Tiie Comprehen.rive High School. McGraw.Hill, New York, 1967. 2.Conant, James Bryant. Tl1e Comprehenlive High School: The Challenge ofan Ideal, N ASSP Bulletin, December 1968. 3. Department of Education and Science, Report1 on Education, No. 36, May 1967. 4.Educational ChaflBI! and Architecturol Coruequence.r, A Report 16 from Educational Facilities Lahoralories, 477 Madison Avenue, New York, 1968. 5. Frost, David and Anthony, Jay. The Englisl}. Avon Booka, New York, 1968. 6.Headmastel'll Association Review, April 1967. 7. Headmasters Association. Tiie Sixth Form of the Future. Gordon Square, London, WCL, 1968. 8. Holmes, Maurice. Tl1e Compreheruive School in Action. Long. mans, Green and Co., Ltd., 1967. 9.lnner London Authority, London CompreheruiveSchool.r 1966. IO.Miller, T. W. G. Value• in the Comprehenlive School. Educa­ tional Monograph No. 5, of Birmingham, 1961. 11.Pcdley, Robin. Tl1e Comprehenlive School. Peluan Books, Ballimore, 1963. 12. Handbook, Hcnbury School, Bristol. Robert JU. Martin is Professor of Education, University of Hawaii, with specinl interest in Secondary School curric· ulum. His experience has included extended periods of work with the schools of the Philippines, Thailand, Pakistan and lAos.