100419 Pinecrest A&T Plan.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

100419 Pinecrest A&T Plan.Indd Pinecrest Recreation Area Traffic/Circulation/ Parking Plan April 20, 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: PaPaciifif c GaG s annd Ellece trt ici Comompap nyn DeD siigngn Worrksk hoh p,, Incn . LLSC Trana spporo tat tiono Connsuultl anantss PO Boxo 566666 2690 Laake Forest RoR add Sttata ele inne, NV 898 44449 TaT hohoe CCiity, CAC 9611454 775.585 8.8 592929 53530.0 583.3 4040535 as required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License # 2130 for the Spring Spring-Gap Stanislaus Project, FERC No.2130 Gap - Stanislaus Project © 2010, Pacifi c Gas and Electric Company CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Objectives |1| 2 Design Principles |2| 3 Existing Conditions |4| 4 Plan |13| 5 Implementation |21| 6 Appendix |24| A. Summary of Stakeholder Meetings B. Summary of Public Meetings C. Design Opportunities D. 2009 Survey Information E Consultation Documentation F. USDA Forest Service Traffi c Circulation Parking Plan Approval Documentation List of Figures List of Tables • Figure 1 - Existing Conditions Map • Table 1 - Existing Parking Supply • Figure 2 - Final Traffi c/Circulation Parking Plan • Table 2 - Commercial Center - Parking Analysis • Figure 3 - Illustrative Plan showing Key • Table 3 - Parking Counts Improvements • Table 4 - Implementation Schedule • Figure 4 - Pinecrest Schoolhouse/Community • Table 5 - Required Improvements to Meet ADA Center Parking Area Requirements and County Code • Figure 5 - Signage Plan • Table 6 - Potential Actions to Address Loss of • Figure 6 - Parking Opportunities Parking • Figure 7 - Circulation and Gateway Opportunities • Figure 8 - Transit Strategy • Figure 9 - Day Use Bus Parking Option A • Figure 10 - Day Use Bus Parking Option B Spring-Gap Stanislaus Project, FERC No.2130 © 2010, Pacifi c Gas and Electric Company Pinecrest Recreation Area 1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Introduction and Objectives Pinecrest Lake is a busy recreation area managed by the Summit Ranger District of the Stanislaus National Forest, United States Forest Service. The Pinecrest Recreation Area con- tains campgrounds, picnic/day use area, commercial center, resorts, marina, 383 recreation residences, and organization camps. The use of the area will not be changing – this project seeks to minimize congestion and issues related to access, parking, circulation and safety. The existing conditions analysis identifi ed three areas of concern needing improvement on which the study should focus; Parking, Circulation and Wayfi nding and Transit Opportunities. The Traffi c/Circulation/Parking Plan is required by the FERC License #2130 for the Spring Gap – Stanislaus Hydroelectric Project. It is titled a “Recreation Sub-Plan (#2)” and supports the Recreation Implementation Plan created by PG&E in collaboration with the USFS – Summit Ranger District. The plan must include: a. Modifi cations to paths of travel that would reduce congestion at Pinecrest Recreation Area, improve visitor safety and minimize resource damage b. Improvements and/or additional parking facilities or operational procedures for day use access c. Implementation responsibilities and an implementation schedule The USFS and PG&E must mutually agree on the plan and PG&E must fi le it with FERC by April 23, 2010. Anticipated management problems the plan may minimize • Issues regarding emergency access in peak use times. • Vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to pedestrian confl icts that impact visitor experience and pedestrian safety. Management objectives and goals • The project should not address the capacity of the beach at Pinecrest but manage what we have. • The project should reduce congestion caused by traffi c and parking activity to improve visitor experience and pedestrian safety. • reduce the number of drivers circulating while searching for a parking space • the parking system needs to be enforceable • investigate viability of alternative modes of travel • There should be no net loss of legal parking spaces, consistent with the Pinecrest Basin Management Direction. • distinguish between the number of vehicles that can fi t in existing parking areas and the number of vehicles that could fi t in parking areas if striped and desig- nated to meet access and safety standards Spring-Gap Stanislaus Project, FERC No.2130 © 2010, Pacifi c Gas and Electric Company | 1 | Traffi c/Circulation/Parking Plan 2. DESIGN PRINCIPLES Design Principles Design principles have been developed for the three main issue areas, circula- tion, parking and transit, to guide the development and exploration of oppor- tunities for the Pinecrest Recreation Area. They are separated into topic areas: environment and community. This provides a structure for the development of evaluation criteria to assess design opportunities. Parking Environment (including visual quality) • Provide screening to parking areas and setbacks where possible to enhance the visual quality of the recreation area • Protect some trees within parking lot areas (and leave space to plant more where possible) to maintain the visual quality and experience of being in the forest • Provide drop-off areas for vehicles and buses and remove bus parking from the day use areas near the lake by identifying alternative parking locations • Incorporate drainage and stormwater management into the confi guration of new parking areas Community • Reduce the impact of the automobile in the day use area by improving parking and therefore improving recreation experience • The available parking supply should be clearly designated through restriping at a minimum or reconfi guring to improve effi ciency and safety • Relocate parking to reduce congestion, improve emergency access and improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians • Provide enforceable parking strategies to ensure the success of the plan Circulation Environment • Reduce the need for drivers to circulate numerous times searching for parking to minimize vehicle miles travelled and air quality Community • Improve the arrival experience to the lake by better defi ning circulation and providing signage and wayfi nding • Provide suffi cient turnaround space at the boat ramp and at Rustic Avenue to prevent these areas becoming blocked on busy days • Address boat trailer parking options to improve effi ciency of movement and park- ing • Improve pedestrian/bike safety by clearly delineating crosswalks and trail networks to reduce potential confl ict with vehicles • Redesign roadways to reduce the potential for large vehicles to inadvertently enter Lakeshore Drive. Spring-Gap Stanislaus Project, FERC No.2130 © 2010, Pacifi c Gas and Electric Company Pinecrest Recreation Area | 2 | 2. DESIGN PRINCIPLES Transit • A transit system that benefi ts and provides incentive for users not to drive to the lake • Operate a short scheduled loop (which can be operated on a 30-minute schedule) with stops located in strategic locations Environment • Improve air quality by reducing the number of vehicles going to the day use area from off-site locations such as campgrounds, organization camps and resorts. Community • Provide consistent, reliable transportation to day use facilities when operating. Spring-Gap Stanislaus Project, FERC No.2130 © 2010, Pacifi c Gas and Electric Company | 3 | Traffi c/Circulation/Parking Plan 3. EXISTINGX. SECTION CONDITIONS HEADER Existing Conditions Introduction The Pinecrest Recreation area is located along State Route 108 in the Stanislaus National Forest roughly 30 miles east of Sonora in Tuolumne County, California. The Pinecrest Recreation Area contains campgrounds, picnic/day use area, commercial center, resorts, marina, 383 recreation residences, and organization camps. The purpose of this section is to discuss existing transportation conditions within the Pinecrest area. Transportation factors are key considerations in the design of a major rec- reation area such as Pinecrest. Vehicular access, parking, and pedestrian/bicycling facilities play crucial roles in the functioning of the facilities, and also have a very substantial impact on the human and natural environment. This information will be used in the Traffi c/ Circulation/Parking (TCP) Plan being developed for the public recreation areas of Pinecrest as a requirement of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license. There is a general consensus among stakeholders that the TCP Plan process should work to reduce congestion through the recreation area, improve visitor safety, and minimize resource dam- age. The TCP Plan will address vehicular and pedestrian circulation improvements. Roadway System The Existing Conditions Map presents the roadway system serving Pinecrest. Regional access to the area is provided by California State Route (SR) 108, and primary access to Pinecrest Lake is provided via Pinecrest Lake Road. The key roadways serving Pinecrest are described as follows: • SR 108 provides regional access from the Central Valley in Oakdale, California eastward through Sonora and Pinecrest and over Sonora Pass to an eastern terminus at US 395 north of Bridgeport and south of Walker. The majority of this roadway is a two-lane facility, though there are several sections of four-lane cross-section west of Pinecrest. According to Caltrans 2008 traffi c count data, the peak month aver- age daily traffi c volume along this roadway within the vicinity of Pinecrest is 2,900 vehicles per day, while the peak hour volume is 760 vehicles per hour. • Pinecrest Lake Road is a County road providing access from SR 108 to the Pinecrest Lake area (a busy summer recreational area) as well as the Dodge Ridge Ski Area (a major winter recreational
Recommended publications
  • June 21, 2017 Purpose: Update the Board Of
    June21,2017 Purpose:UpdatetheBoardofDirectorsontheprocessofhiringamasterplanconsultantforthe downhillskiareaatTahoeDonnerAssociation. Background: Tahoe Donner’s current Downhill Ski Lodge was built by DART in 1970, with subsequent additions and remodels through the last 45 years, attempting to accommodate growingvisitationnumbersandservicelevels.Afewyearsago,theGeneralPlanCommittee’s DownhillSkiAreaSubͲgroupworkedtoprovideacomprehensive2013report,includinganalysis ofthefollowingmetricsoftheDownhillSkiOperations,seeattached; OnAugust6,2016,Aprojectinformationpaper(PIP)wasprovidedtotheBoardofDirectors,and duringthe2016BudgetProcess,a$50KDevelopmentFundbudgetwasidentifiedandapproved bytheBoardofDirectorsforexpenditurein2017.OnNovember10,2016,TheGPCinitiateda TaskForcetoregainthe2013momentum,toidentifyanddetailfurtheropportunitiesatthe DownhillSkiArea.InAprilof2017,theTaskForcereceivedapprovaltoproceedwiththeRFP processtosolicittwoindustryleaderswithexperienceinskiareamasterplanning,seeattached SOQ’s. Discussion: 1. BothconsultantsprovidedfeeproposalsbythedeadlineofJune16th.Afterqualifying bothproposals,bothwerethoroughandwellmatched,bothwithpositivereferences. 2. BothfeeproposalsarewithintheBoardapproved$50KDFbudgetfor2017. 3. Furtherclarificationsandquestionsarecurrentlyunderwaywithbothconsultants,so thatscoringresultsandweightingcanbefinalizedandtallied.Ifacontractcanbe executedinearlyJuly,thedraftreportcouldbeavailableandpresentedatthe SeptemberGPCMeeting,whichwouldreflectnearly80%ofthecontentinfinalreport. 4. Oncefeedbackisprovided,thefinalversionwouldbecompletedwithinsixweeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Snow King Mountain Resort On-Mountain Improvements
    Snow King Mountain Resort On-Mountain Improvements Projects EIS Cultural Resource NHPA Section 106 Summary and Agency Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Historic Snow King Ski Area (48TE1944) Bridger-Teton National Forest November 6, 2019 John P. Schubert, Heritage Program Manager With contributions and edits by Richa Wilson, Architectural Historian 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 UNDERTAKING/PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................. 7 ELIGIBILITY/SITE UPDATE .............................................................................................................................. 8 Statement of Significance ......................................................................................................................... 8 Period of Significance .............................................................................................................................. 10 Level of Significance ................................................................................................................................ 10 Historic District Boundary ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A FIS and USSA Homologations Valid 2016-17 (As of March 26 2016)
    USA FIS and USSA Homologations Valid 2016-17 (as of March 26 2016) State Place / Venue / Ski Area Trail / Slope Name Number Event Vertical ENL/Registered Year End Validty Status STATUS: OK - homologation continues valid for 2016-17 season; SEE ALSO - Report on WORK IN PROCESS as of March 26 2016 AK Alyeska Resort Alyeska GS 9605/09/10 GS 448 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Gail's Gully 11652/02/15 GS 341 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Alyeska Resort Gail's Gully 11652/02/15 SL 183 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Alyeska Resort Glacier Bowl 11841/11/15 DH 751 2015 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Glacier Bowl 11842/11/15 SG 468 2015 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Racing Trail 9602/09/10 SL 211 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort South Edge-Mambo 11840/11/15 SL 190 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Alyeska Resort Tanaka Hill 9601/09/10 SL 158 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Upper Mountain GS 9600/09/10 GS 440 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Hilary's GS U706/12/10 GS 252 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Hilary's SL U707/12/10 SL 138 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Hilltop Ptarmigan/Ram's Head U1081/12/15 GS 91 REGISTERED 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Hilltop Ptarmigan/Ram's Head U1082/12/15 SL 91 REGISTERED 2015 Nov 2025 OK AZ Arizona Snow Bowl Lower Ridge/Phoenix/Agassiz 11957/01/16 GS 200 ENL 2016 Nov 2026 OK AZ Arizona Snow Bowl Phoenix/Agassiz 11958/01/16 SL 140 2016 Nov 2026 OK CA Alpine Meadows Boomerang 11782/10/15 GS 279 2015 Nov 2025 OK CA Alpine Meadows Boomerang 11783/10/15 SL 200 2015 Nov 2025 OK CA Alpine Meadows Kangaroo U815/11/11 GS 115 REGISTERED 2011 Nov 2021 OK
    [Show full text]
  • EXPIRED Courses to March 31 2013
    FIS and USSA Homologations in USA EXPIRED Courses to March 31 2013 State Place/Venue/Ski Area Trail/Slope Name Number Event Vertical ENL/Registered Year Status STATUS: EXP - Homologation expired as of Apr 15 2014 AK Alpenglow Ptarmigan Face 2611/131/86 SL 219 1986 EXP AK Alpenglow Ptarmigan Ridge 6444/354/01 SG 351 2001 EXP AK Alpenglow Rendevous Bowl 2610/130/86 GS 342 1986 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Denali 4548/59/96 SG 602 1996 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Denali SG Racing Trail 2608/128/86 SG 602 1986 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Glacier Bowl/Bowl Trail 2609/129/86 SG 762 1986 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Midway Trail 2087/27/84 SL 153 1984 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Racing Trail 2085/25/84 SL 220 1984 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Round House 2556/76/86 SG 602 1986 EXP AK Alyeska Resort South Edge Trail 2086/26/84 SL 219 1984 EXP AK Alyeska Resort Upper Mountain 1448/80/79 SL 177 1979 EXP AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Centennial/Face/Ego 6443/353/01 SG 415 2001 EXP AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Centennial/Face/Ego 2114/54/84 GS 255 1984 EXP AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Ego and Centennial 2123/63/84 SL 155 1984 EXP AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Hilary's Run U331/02/07 DH 415 2007 EXP CA Alpine Meadows Junior Olympic DH 2337/136/85 SG 464 1985 EXP CA Alpine Meadows Sherwood U023/11/91 SG 256 REGISTERED 1991 EXP CA Alpine Meadows Twilight Zone 6481/391/01 SL 200 2001 EXP CA Alpine Meadows Twilight Zone 6480/390/01 GS 251 2001 EXP CA Alpine Meadows Upper Kangaroo 3716/66/91 GS 288 1991 EXP CA Alpine Meadows Kangaroo U022/11/91 SL 159 1991 EXP CA Bear Valley Mountain Anticipation 2831/34/87 GS 256 1987
    [Show full text]
  • 108 US Resorts Where Seniors Ski Free*
    108 US Resorts Where Seniors Ski Free* State Company Website Ski Free Age Alabama Cloudmont Ski & Golf www.cloudmont.com 75 Alaska Mt. Eyak Ski Area www.mteyak.org 60 Arizona Arizona Snowbowl www.arizonasnowbowl.com 70 www.elkridgeski.com 75 Mt. Lemmon Ski Valley www.skithelemmon.com 70 California Alta Sierra Ski Resort & Terrain Park www.altasierra.com 90 Dodge Ridge Ski Area www.dodgeridge.com 82 June Mountain www.junemountain.com 80 Mammoth www.mammothmountain.com 80 Mountain High Resort www.mthigh.com 70 Royal Gorge Cross Country Ski Resort www.royalgorge.com 75 Snow Valley Mountain Resort www.snow-valley.com 70 Sugar Bowl Resort www.sugarbowl.com 70 Tahoe Donner Ski Area www.skitahoedonner.com 70 Colorado Monarch Mountain www.skimonarch.com 69 Sunlight Mountain Resort www.sunlightmtn.com 80 Idaho Lookout Pass Ski Area www.skilookout.com 80 Rotarun Ski Club, Inc. rotarunskiarea.org 65 Schweitzer Mountain Resort www.schweitzer.com 80 Soldier Mountain Ski Area www.soldiermountain.com 70 Tamarack Resort www.tamarackidaho.com 70 Maine Big Rock Mountain www.bigrockmaine.com 75 Black Mountain of Maine www.skiblackmountain.org 75 Camden Snow Bowl www.camdensnowbowl.com 70 Lost Valley Ski Area www.lostvalleyski.com 75 Mt. Abram Resort www.mtabram.com 80 Saddleback Maine www.saddlebackmaine.com 70 Sunday River Resort www.sundayriver.com 80 Maryland Wisp Resort www.wispresort.com 70 70 State Company Website Ski Free Age Michigan, cont. Boyne Highlands Resort www.boynehighlands.com 80 Boyne Mountain Resort www.boynemountain.com 80 Cannonsburg Ski Area www.cannonsburg.com 70 Crystal Mountain www.crystalmountain.com 70 www.mt-holiday.com 65 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division
    Promoting opportunities for quality, human-powered winter recreation and protecting winter wildlands OFF-HIGHWAY MOTOR VEHICLE RECREATION DIVISION CIRCUMVENTS COMMISSION The Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR) Division, for grooming without Commission approval and without involving part of Californiaʼs Department of Parks and Recreation, runs their own Winter Recreation Committee and OHV Stakeholders the stateʼs Sno-Park and Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Roundtable. Program, which includes managing eight State Vehicle Recreation Those plans are likely to see fruition this winter. Under newly- Areas. Funded 88% by state gas taxes and the remainder from appointed Deputy Director Daphne Greene, the Division has OHV registration and SVRA entrance fees, the Division disburses implemented a plan to contract with National Forests to provide millions of dollars each year in the form of grants to local, state, grooming of snowmobile trails on national forest land, with the and federal agencies to promote and manage OHV recreation. Forest Service doing the actual grooming. The State will, in effect, One recipient of these funds is the U. S. Forest Service, which take over control and management of the snowmobile trails and uses the money to groom snowmobiles trails and pay for winter use the federal government as a contractor. The grooming will be law enforcement. funded out of the Divisionʼs internal support funds and not out of Beginning in 1970, the winter recreation program grew gradually the $17 million budgeted this year for external grants. to become an annual $2 million program by 2002, providing plow- This convoluted arrangement is necessitated by the State laws ing, grooming, and law enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Slopes for Ski Areas
    FOREWORD s a society, we find ourselves needing more than ever to escape every A day pressures by heading for the outdoors. With that increasing demand comes impacts and a number of emerging environmental concerns that must be addressed proactively.The ski industry adopted this Environmental Charter in 2000 as a framework for sustainability in our operations. We are revising it today to renew our commitment to responsible stewardship and fos- ter improved environmental performance industry-wide. The premier alpine recreation sites we have today were made possible through the vision, pioneering spirit and hard work of our industry’s founders. The value of those efforts holds today, as resorts are showcases of quality recreation opportunities for skiers, snowboarders, and countless summer guests as well. Although many forces may draw us to the slopes—the thrill and excitement of sliding down a mountain, the chance to reconnect with family and friends—we can never underestimate the value of the natural surroundings in renewing the human spirit.We respect the natural settings that we call home and hope that through our current efforts, we will preserve this same experience for future generations to enjoy. —Michael Berry, National Ski Areas Association President December 2005 1 INTRODUCTION marks the five-year anniversary for Sustainable Slopes and the first revision 2005 to the Environmental Charter. This revision ensures that our Principles are current and reflect the latest technology and best management practices to foster continuing improvement in environmental performance. It also acknowledges and incorporates emerging resources available from our Partnering Organizations as well as specific new ‘options for get- ting there’ from endorsing resorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ski Resort Sustainability: Evaluating Environmental Programs at Ski Resorts Partnered with the NSAA Sustainable Slopes Program
    Ski Resort Sustainability: Evaluating environmental programs at ski resorts partnered with the NSAA Sustainable Slopes Program Thesis Erme Catino, M.S. Environmental Studies Candidate Green Mountain College, Poultney VT Table Of Contents Acknowledgments ...............................................2 Abstract.............................................................3 Introduction .......................................................6 Methods........................................................... 12 Survey Results and Discussion............................ 16 Focal Resort Analysis ......................................... 23 Conclusion ....................................................... 38 References ....................................................... 45 Appendix A – Ski Resort Sustainability Survey ...... 49 Appendix B – Focal Resorts and List of Surveyed Resorts. ........................................................... 50 Appendix C – Sustainable Slopes Program Charter 55 1 Acknowledgments In completion of this project I would like to thank my Thesis Advisor Kirk Kardashian and Thesis Coordinator Mark Jordan. Their insight, patience, and dedication in assisting me with this project was extremely helpful and much appreciated. In addition, I am grateful to our Program Director, Jim Harding, who helped me find a way to connect my passion for skiing and my graduate studies. Having the opportunity to complete an Independent Study and Practicum at two separate ski resorts was not only fun, but also provided direct hands
    [Show full text]
  • Valid 2017-18 at Apr 2017
    VALID for 2017-18 - as of April 2017 Region STATE PLACE NAME Event Type Number YEAR EndValidity Status REGISTERD VDROP CE IL Chestnut Mountain Apache GS GS U U648/11/10 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 110 CE IL Chestnut Mountain Apache SL SL U U649/11/10 2010 15-Nov-20 OK 110 CE IL Chestnut Mountain Crazy Horse SL U U976/10/14 2014 15-Nov-24 OK 111 CE IL Chestnut Mountain Crazy Horse GS U U975/10/14 2014 15-Nov-24 OK REGISTERED 111 CE IL Chestnut Mountain War Dance SL U U974/10/14 2014 15-Nov-24 OK 108 CE IL Chestnut Mountain War Dance GS U U973/10/14 2014 15-Nov-24 OK REGISTERED 108 CE IN Perfect North Slopes Intermission SL U U699/12/10 A 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 70 CE IN Perfect North Slopes Intermission GS U U698/12/10 A 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 70 CE IN Perfect North Slopes Runway GS U U700/12/10 A 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 66 CE IN Perfect North Slopes Runway SL U U701/12/10 A 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 66 CE IN Perfect North Slopes Tuff Enuff SL U U703/12/10 A 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 99 CE IN Perfect North Slopes Tuff Enuff GS U U702/12/10 A 2010 15-Nov-20 OK REGISTERED 99 CE MI Boyne Highlands Heather SL F 11359/09/14 2014 01-Nov-24 OK 147 CE MI Boyne Highlands Heather GS U U500/11/09 2009 15-Nov-19 OK REGISTERED 147 CE MI Boyne Highlands North Challenger GS U U522/11/09 2009 15-Nov-19 OK REGISTERED 102 CE MI Boyne Highlands North Challenger SL U U523/11/09 2009 15-Nov-19 OK 102 CE MI Boyne Highlands South Challenger SL F 11361/09/14 2014 01-Nov-24 OK ENL MEN 120 CE MI Boyne Highlands South Challenger GS U U524/11/09
    [Show full text]
  • Oct 2 5 1999
    THE VIABILITY OF A PRIVATE FOUR-SEASON RESORT IN NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND by William D. Adams B.A., Political Science, 1987 Lehigh University & Shawn M. Hurley B.A., Architecture, 1994 Washington University Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 1999 © 1999 William D. Adams and Shawn M. Hurley. All rights reserved. The authors hereby grant to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: D rtmentof n uanng Signature of Author: "epartrneni%6f Urb aO ies n ing J , 1999 Certified by: Blake Eagle Chairman, Center for Real Estate Thesis Advisor Accepted by: William C. Wheaton FMASSACHUSETTS INSTITU Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development OF TECHINOLOGY OCT 2 5 1999 LIBRARI=.Q THE VIABILITY OF A PRIVATE FOUR-SEASON RESORT IN NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND by William D. Adams & Shawn M. Hurley Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on July 30, 1999 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development. at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ABSTRACT The avid New England skier is having increasing difficulty enjoying their sport. In the age of consolidation and rising costs, the New England ski industry is becoming overcrowded and less fun for the consumer. The ski industry throughout the country and particularly in New England has realized little growth over the past ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2001 #120
    CHINA LAKE MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP P. O. BOX 2037 RIDGECREST CA 93556 AUGUST 2001 NUMBER 120 TRAINING SCHEDULE Aug 11- 12 Sat-Sun Whitney Rockwell Aug 17 -19 Fri-Sun Ritter & Banner Huey Aug 18 Sat Inyo joint stretcher practice Roseman Aug 24-26 Fri-Sun Vennacher Needle & Ruskin Roseman Aug 27 Mon Summer party Mitchells Aug 30-Sep 3 Thu-Mon Goddard Myers Sep 8-9 Sat-Sun Tahquitz Hueber Sep 10 Mon Meeting Huey/C. Burge/Castro Sep 12 Wed CPR First Aid Committee Sep 14-16 Fri-Sun Conness Gates Sep 15 Sat CRMRA meeting (San Diego) Sep 22-23 Sat-Sun Ruby Rockwell Sep 28-30 Fri-Sun Humphreys Davis Oct 3 Wed First Aid-Topic A First Aid Committee Oct 5-8 Fri-Mon Yosemite Valley Finco Oct 10 Wed First Aid-Topic A First Aid Committee Oct 12-14 Fri-Sun Baxter Toler Oct 15 Mon Meeting Rockwell/Myers/Mitchell Oct 16 Tue Stretcher Hut night Training Committee Oct 17 Wed First Aid-Topic A First Aid Committee Oct 20 Sat Stretcher practice Training Committee Oct 24 Wed First Aid-Topic A First Aid Committee Oct 26-28 Fri-Sun Desert peaks Schafhauser SUNDAY ROCK CLIMBING coordinated by Bud Gates CLMRG is funded in part by United Way of Indian Wells Valley. OPERATIONS 01-02 (OES 01-0899) 9 Jul 01 Search Kennedy Meadows (Sonora Pass Road) Tom Sakai I received a call from Arnold Gaffery (Sierra Madre) at 1745 on Saturday, 7 July 2001, asking if we could field a team for a search in the Emigrant Wilderness north of Yosemite (Tuolumne County).
    [Show full text]
  • NSAA Enviro Charter 6X8
    INTRODUCTION 1 he environment is a ski area’s number one asset. The founders of the ski industry recognized that fact 60 years ago in choosing some of the most spectacular terrain for establishing ski areas. The natural surround- ings are awe inspiring and provide a backdrop unmatched in any other sport. The premier alpine recreation sites we have today were made possi- ble through the vision, pioneering spirit and hard work of our industry’s Tfounders.T The value of those efforts holds today, as resorts are showcases of quality recreation opportunities for skiers, snowboarders, and countless summer guests as well. Although many forces may draw us to the slopes—the thrill and excitement of sliding down a mountain, the chance to reconnect with family and friends—we can never underestimate the value of the natural surroundings in renewing the human spirit. As a society, we now find ourselves needing more than ever to escape every day pressures by heading for the outdoors. With that increasing demand comes impacts and a number of emerging environmental concerns that must be addressed proactively. As an industry, we need to apply the same vision and pioneering spirit of our founders to this new set of challenges. It is not enough to simply provide opportunities for fun and recreation; we must also be part of the solution. We are taking this collective step of adopting our Environmental Charter to demonstrate our commitment to good environmental stewardship. We do so for a number of reasons. We respect the natural settings that we call home and want the same experience to be available for future genera- tions.
    [Show full text]