DOCSLIB.ORG

Idaho County All Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Idaho County All Hazard Mitigation Plan IDAHO COUNTY, ID AHO M U LT I - HAZARD MITIGATION PL AN 2015 REVISION DRAFT Prepared By Northwest Management, Inc. Foreword “Hazard mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. Mitigation activities may be implemented prior to, during, or after an incident. However, it has been demonstrated that hazard mitigation is most effective when based on an inclusive, comprehensive, long-term plan that is developed before a disaster occurs.”1 The Idaho County, Idaho Multi - Hazard Mitigation Plan was updated in 2014-15 by the Idaho County MHMP planning committee in cooperation with Northwest Management, Inc. of Moscow, Idaho. This Plan satisfies the requirements for a local multi-hazard mitigation plan and flood mitigation plan under 44 CFR Part 201.6 and 79.6. 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance.” July 1, 2008. 1 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 – Plan Overview ................................................................................................................. 8 Overview of this Plan and its Development ................................................................................. 8 Phase I Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Goals and Guiding Principles ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2 – Planning Process .......................................................................................................... 22 Documenting the Planning Process .............................................................................................. 22 The Planning Team .................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Description of the Planning Process................................................................................................................................... 22 Planning Committee Meetings .............................................................................................................................................. 24 Public Involvement ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Documented Review Process ................................................................................................................................................. 31 Plan Monitoring and Maintenance ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3 – Community Profile ...................................................................................................... 36 Idaho County Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 36 Description of the Region ........................................................................................................................................................ 37 Natural Resources ...................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Hazard Management Capabilities ...................................................................................................................................... 43 Regional Hazard Profile .......................................................................................................................................................... 44 Chapter 4 – Flood ................................................................................................................................. 50 Regional and Local Hazard Profile ................................................................................................ 50 Jurisdictional Risk and Vulnerability Assessment .................................................................. 54 Idaho County Annex ................................................................................................................................................................... 55 Individual Community Assessments ............................................................................................ 64 City of Grangeville ...................................................................................................................................................................... 64 City of Ferdinand ......................................................................................................................................................................... 69 City of Cottonwood ..................................................................................................................................................................... 71 City of Riggins ............................................................................................................................................................................... 74 City of Stites ................................................................................................................................................................................... 78 City of Kamiah .............................................................................................................................................................................. 82 City of Kooskia .............................................................................................................................................................................. 87 City of White Bird ........................................................................................................................................................................ 91 Chapter 5 – Earthquake..................................................................................................................... 98 Regional and Local Hazard Profile ................................................................................................ 98 2 Jurisdictional Risk and Vulnerability Assessment ............................................................... 102 Idaho County Annex ................................................................................................................................................................ 102 Individual Community Assessments ......................................................................................... 106 City of Grangeville ................................................................................................................................................................... 106 City of Ferdinand ...................................................................................................................................................................... 107 City of Cottonwood .................................................................................................................................................................. 108 City of Riggins ............................................................................................................................................................................ 109 City of Stites ................................................................................................................................................................................ 109 City of Kamiah ........................................................................................................................................................................... 110 City of Kooskia ........................................................................................................................................................................... 111 City of White Bird ..................................................................................................................................................................... 112 Chapter 6 – Landslide ..................................................................................................................... 116 Regional and Local Hazard Profiles ........................................................................................... 116 Jurisdictional Risk and Vulnerability Assessment ............................................................... 119 Idaho County Annex ................................................................................................................................................................ 119 Individual Community Assessments ......................................................................................... 125 City of Grangeville ................................................................................................................................................................... 125 City of Ferdinand .....................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nez Perce Tribe) Food Sovereignty Assessment
    Nimi’ipuu (Nez Perce Tribe) Food Sovereignty Assessment Columbia River Basin, Showing Lands Ceded by the Nez Perce and Current Reservation Source: Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission http://www.critfc.org/member_tribes_overview/nez-perce-tribe/ Prepared for the Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee by Ken Meter, Crossroads Resource Center (Minneapolis) December 2017 Nez Perce Tribe Food Sovereignty Assessment — Ken Meter, Crossroads Resource Center — 2017 Executive Summary The aim of this study is to inform and strengthen Nimi’ipuu (Nez Perce) tribal efforts to achieve greater food sovereignty. To accomplish this purpose, public data sets were compiled to characterize conditions on the reservation and estimate the food needs of tribal members. Tribal leaders were interviewed to identify the significant food system assets, and visions for food sovereignty, held by the Tribe. Finally, the report outlines some of the approaches the Tribe contemplates taKing to increase its food sovereignty. Central to both Nimi’ipuu culture and to the nourishment of tribal members is subsistence gathering of wild foods. This stands at the core of food sovereignty initiatives. Yet tribal leaders are also pursuing plans to build a more robust agricultural system that will feed tribal members. Community gardens have sprung up on the Reservation, and many people maintain private gardens for their own use. Tribal hatcheries and watershed sustainability efforts have been highly successful in ensuring robust fisheries in the Columbia River watershed. Our research found that the 3,536 members of the Nez Perce Tribe have less power over the Reservation land than they would ideally liKe to have, with only 17% of Reservation land owned by the Tribe or tribal members (Local Foods Local Places 2017; Nez Perce Tribe Land Services).
    [Show full text]
  • LOCATION of IDAHO's TERRITORIAL CAPITAL Number 344 December 24, 1964
    344 IDAHO STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY REFERENCE SERIES LOCATION OF IDAHO'S TERRITORIAL CAPITAL Number 344 December 24, 1964 On December 24, 1864, Boise became the capital of the territory of Idaho. But although the act of the territorial legislature was clear and simple, the situation was not, and the story surrounding it is typical of politics of that day. When the territory of Idaho was established by Congress, March 4, 1863, the law provided that the first territorial legislature should select a permanent capital. Originally, before the new territory was set up, the weight of population had been in the north and the principal city there was Lewiston. When the first territorial governor, William Henson Wallace, reached the territory in July, 1863, it was logical for him to establish his office in Lewiston and proclaim the organization of the territory from that town. It was also to Lewiston that he summoned the first territorial legislature in December, 1863. But for a little more than a year the center of population had been shifting. Gold had been struck in the Boise Basin in the summer of 1862, and the new mines had drawn population from north to south. When the census, on which apportionment was based, was taken in September, 1863, the area around Boise already had far more people than did the northern mines around Lewiston. The trend continued in coming years. That first legislature in Lewiston in 1863 did not face the issue of locating a definite territorial capital. Thus all through 1864, Lewiston was the temporary seat of the territorial government, but there was no permanent capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Workforce Information
    Idaho Workforce Information Annual Progress Report Reference Period ~ July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 Idaho completed all core deliverables in Program Year 2011 as outlined in the Workforce Information Plan abstract. Adjustments, additions and enhancements were made to accommodate customer inquiries and needs and to make Idaho’s workforce information system more effective and sustainable. Idaho’s economic volatility over the last several years has put immense pressure on LMI staff to closely monitor Idaho’s economy and publish insight on directional changes and shifts in an economy that in 2010 and 2011 experienced the worst performance on record in Idaho. The economic climate during this period made it imperative that the staff listen to department customers and provide the data that suit their needs as Idaho navigates through a deep economic recession and attempts to expand. To meet customer needs, the Idaho Department of Labor and the Workforce Development Council are fully engaged in planning and implementing the Workforce Information Plan. The department works directly with the council to identify the labor market information needs of communities and regions throughout the state. The department also presents current research at council meetings and always uses member feedback to make changes to the current plan to better serve local customers and stakeholders. Other than Web metrics, for workforce information alone feedback is mostly in a non-statistical anecdotal format. However an agency-wide comprehensive customer satisfaction research effort was conducted in 2011 that assisted the workforce information team in the development of our products. We have used these findings to assess our web delivery mechanism as well as the research products and data as whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park, Submerged Resources Survey
    te t/:p--J038 .. } ,' ,, .. ' . ·� . I ; ,· . ' . '/ YEL.LOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK " � ! I '!'' • SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY I ·' I i I \. ,· i .\ I: ··r· 'I I CC®ll®IT' §��IID� YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK a product of the NATIONAL PARK SERVICE SYSTEMWIDE ARCHEOLOGICALINVENTORY PROGRAM YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Submerged Resources Survey James E. Bradford Archeologist Matthew A. Russell Archeologist Larry E. Murphy Archeologist Timothy G. Smith Geodesist Submerged Resources Center Intermountain Region National Park Service Santa Fe, New Mexico 1999 11 Submerged Resources Center Cultural Resources Management Intermountain Region National Park Service US Department of the Interior 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................. X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... xi PART 1: REMOTE SENSING SURVEY ..................................... ............................................ 1 Matthew A. Russell, Larry E. Murphy and Timothy G. Smith INTRODUCTION .... ............................ ................ ........................................... ............. 2 PROBLEM STATEMENT................... ........................................................................ 3 SURVEY DESIGN AND RATIONALE ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier Mountain Snow Report
    Soldier Mountain Snow Report Discoidal or tonetic, Randal never profiles any infrequency! How world is Gene when quintessential and contrasuggestible Angel wigwagging some safe-breakers? Guiltless Irving never zone so scrutinizingly or peeps any pricks senselessly. Plan for families or end of mountain snow at kmvt at the Let us do not constitute endorsement by soldier mountain is a report from creating locally before she knows it. Get in and charming town of the reports and. Ski Report KIVI-TV. Tamarack Resort gets ready for leave much as 50 inches of new. Soldier mountain resort in an issue! See more ideas about snow tubing pocono mountains snow. You have soldier mountain offers excellent food and alike with extra bonuses on your lodging options below and beyond the reports and. Soldier mountain ski area were hit, idaho ski trails off, mostly cloudy with good amount of sparklers are dangerous work to enjoy skiing in central part in. The grin from detention OR who bought Soldier Mountain Ski wax in. Soldier Mountain ski village in Idaho Snowcomparison. Soldier Hollow Today's Forecast HiLo 34 21 Today's as Snow 0 Current in Depth 0. Soldier Mountain Reopen 0211 46 60 base ThuFri 9a-4p. Grazing Sheep in National Forests Hearings Before. Idaho SnowForecast. For visitors alike who lived anywhere, we will report of snow report for bringing in place full of. After school on the camas prairie near boise as the school can rent ski area, sunshine should idaho are you. Couch summit from your needs specific additional external links you should pursue as all units in the power goes down deep and extreme avalanche mitigation work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idaho Fiscal Impact Model
    ~ University of Idaho ~ College ot Agriculture The Idaho Fiscal Impact Model By: Stephen Cooke and Linette Fox A. E. Research Series No. 94-18 March 1994 Departmental Working Paper Series Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology College of Agriculture IJniversity of Idaho Moscow, Idaho 83844-2334 THE IDAHO FISCAL IMPACT MODEL STEPHEN COOKE AND LINETTE FOX* Draft: March 1994 Revised: December 7, 1994 Revised: April 14, 1995 *Associate Professor and Research Associate in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843 I DFI PS.DOC The Idaho Fiscal Impact Model 1 1. THE PROBLEM Local public officials are responsible for providing a level of public services that 1) reflects the tastes and preferences of the electorate, 2) meet the requirements of federal and state government, and 3) complements the growth in population and the changes in the economy. These responsibilities suggest a planning perspective by local officials for public service. However, local officials more often find themselves reacting to public and private policy decisions. In Idaho, two interrelated forces are affecting public services policy decisions. First, the state and federal governments are in the process of renegotiating the social contract regarding the environment. This process includes policies that affect timber harvests, grazing fees, wilderness designations, endanger species protection including the wolf and the shockeye salmon. Since two-thirds of the land in Idaho is owned by state and federal government these policies have a significant impact on local communities including their local governments. For example, county and school officials are affected by the US Forest Service decisions on timber production.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Status of Delegates and Resident Commis
    Ch. 7 § 2 DESCHLER’S PRECEDENTS § 2.24 The Senate may, by reiterated that request for the du- unanimous consent, ex- ration of the 85th Congress. change the committee senior- It was so ordered by the Senate. ity of two Senators pursuant to a request by one of them. On Feb. 23, 1955,(6) Senator § 3. Status of Delegates Styles Bridges, of New Hamp- and Resident Commis- shire, asked and obtained unani- sioner mous consent that his position as ranking minority member of the Delegates and Resident Com- Senate Armed Services Committee missioners are those statutory of- be exchanged for that of Senator Everett Saltonstall, of Massachu- ficers who represent in the House setts, the next ranking minority the constituencies of territories member of that committee, for the and properties owned by the duration of the 84th Congress, United States but not admitted to with the understanding that that statehood.(9) Although the persons arrangement was temporary in holding those offices have many of nature, and that at the expiration of the 84th Congress he would re- 9. For general discussion of the status sume his seniority rights.(7) of Delegates, see 1 Hinds’ Precedents In the succeeding Congress, on §§ 400, 421, 473; 6 Cannon’s Prece- Jan. 22, 1957,(8) Senator Bridges dents §§ 240, 243. In early Congresses, Delegates when Senator Edwin F. Ladd (N.D.) were construed only as business was not designated to the chairman- agents of chattels belonging to the ship of the Committee on Public United States, without policymaking Lands and Surveys, to which he had power (1 Hinds’ Precedents § 473), seniority under the traditional prac- and the statutes providing for Dele- tice.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho's Forest Products Industry: a Descriptive Analysis
    United States Department of Agriculture Idaho’s Forest Products Forest Service Industry: A Descriptive Rocky Mountain Research Station Analysis Resource Bulletin RMRS-RB-4 Todd A. Morgan December 2004 Charles E. Keegan, III Timothy P. Spoelma Thale Dillon A. Lorin Hearst Francis G. Wagner Larry T. DeBlander Abstract _____________________________________ Morgan, Todd A.; Keegan, Charles E., III; Spoelma, Timothy P.; Dillon, Thale; Hearst, A. Lorin; Wagner, Francis G.; DeBlander, Larry T. Idaho’s forest products industry: a descriptive analysis. Resour. Bull. RMRS-RB-4. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 31 p. This report provides a description of the structure, capacity, and condition of Idaho’s primary forest products industry; traces the flow of Idaho’s 2001 timber harvest through the primary sectors; and quantifies volumes and uses of wood fiber. The economic contribution of the forest products industry to the State and historical industry changes are discussed, as well as trends in timber harvest, production, and sales. Keywords: Idaho, forest economics, mill residue, primary forest products, timber harvest Authors ______________________ • Idaho sawmills processed 89 percent of the timber harvested in Idaho and produced 1.76 billion board Todd A. Morgan, Timothy P. Spoelma, and A. Lorin feet in 2001, with plants producing over 10 MMBF Hearst are Research Foresters, Charles E. Keegan, III, annually accounting for over 98 percent of total is the Director of Forest Industry Research, and Thale production. Dillon is a Research Associate, Bureau of Business and • Idaho sawmills recovered 1.86 board feet lumber Economic Research, University of Montana, Missoula, tally per board foot of Scribner input—the highest MT 59812.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-001 (Revised Feb. 1993) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Elfers. Jurden Henry. Barn and Field other names/site number IHSI #49-17934: SITS #10-IH-527 2. Location street & number John Day Creek N/A not for publication City or town Lucile X vicinity state Idaho code ID county Idaho code 049 zip code 83530 3. State/Federal Agency Certification_____ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _X_nationally _statewide _locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Contributions of Land Conserved by the USDA Forest Service’S Forest Legacy Program
    Economic Contributions of Land Conserved by the USDA Forest Service’s Forest Legacy Program University of Massachusetts Amherst Helena Murray Paul Catanzaro Marla Markowski-Lindsay USDA Forest Service Brett Butler Henry Eichman This work was funded by the USDA Forest Service State & Private Forestry program Economic Contributions of Land Conserved by the USDA Forest Service’s Forest Legacy Program University of Massachusetts Amherst Helena Murray Paul Catanzaro Marla Markowski-Lindsay USDA Forest Service Brett Butler Henry Eichman This work was funded by the USDA Forest Service State & Private Forestry program CONTENTS iii Figures and Tables 1 Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Study Areas 8 Economic Contributions 8 Methods 12 Results 16 Discussion 17 Project Examples 17 Michigan: Pilgrim River Forest 19 Idaho: Boundary County FLP Projects 20 South Carolina: Liberty Hill Wildlife Management Area 21 Montana: Haskill Basin Watershed Project 22 New Hampshire: Randolph Community Forest 23 Conclusions 24 References 27 Appendix Cover photo: The private forests of northern Idaho provide many public benefits such as recreation opportunities, jobs in the forest products industry, clean water, secure wildlife habitat and connectivity, and aesthetic beauty that residents and visitors alike cherish. Photo credit: Kennon McClintock ii FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES 3 Figure 1. Locations of the four study areas. 4 Figure 2. Location of the 1,297,416 acres conserved by the FLP in the Northern Forest study area. 5 Figure 3. Locations of the 265,502 acres conserved by the FLP in the Northern WI/Upp er Peninsula study area. 6 Figure 4. Locations of the 141,643 acres conserved by the FLP in the GA/SC study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Governor of Idaho, 1879 [With] Report of the Surveyor-General of Idaho, 1879
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 10-8-1879 Report of the Governor of Idaho, 1879 [with] Report of the Surveyor-General of Idaho, 1879 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Exec. Doc. No.1, 46th Cong., 2nd Sess. (1879) This House Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR OF IDAHO. EXECUTIVE DEPA.RTMENT, IDAHO TERRITORY, Boise City, October 8, 1879. SIR: In compliance with your request of August 28th ultimo, I have the honor to submit the following pages : · . Unfortunately the subject of collecting statistics has, thus far, re­ ceived so little attention of the legislature as to render completeness of statement and exactness in detail impossible, in undertaking a report upon the annual advance made in the various departments of industry and growth, concerning which information is sought. This paper, therefore, is made up of general facts · and discussion, rather than of figures. The year bas been one of gene-ral thrift and prosperity. Agri­ culture has been remunerative. Mining bas developed with remarkable success in various parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Passport Will Not Be Validated Or Sent Until You Read This Agreement, Completely Answer the Survey Form Questions and Sign the Consent Form on the Application
    Your Passport will not be validated or sent until you read this agreement, completely answer the survey form questions and sign the consent form on the application. 1. The 2010-11 Ski Idaho and Ski the Northwest Rockies Fifth Grade Passport is a non-transferable document which entitles the 5th grader to whom it is issued to obtain all-day lift tickets, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, at participating member resorts during the 2010-11 season. The following Ski Idaho and Ski the Northwest Rockies ski areas are participating for the 2010-11 season: 49 Degrees North, Bald Mountain, Bogus Basin, Brundage, Cottonwood Butte, Kelly Canyon, Grand Targhee, Little Ski Hill, Lookout Pass, Lost Trail, Magic Mountain, Mission Ridge, Mt. Spokane, Pebble Creek, Schweitzer Mountain, Silver Mountain, Soldier Mountain and Sun Valley. All Ski Idaho and Ski the Northwest Rockies participating ski areas reserve the right to withdraw or join the program at any time. 2. The Passport is valid at all participating Ski Idaho and Ski the Northwest Rockies member ski areas during the 2010-11 season except on the blackout dates identified by each ski area during the 2010-11 season. 3. The Passport may be used to obtain no more than three (3) all-day lift tickets at each participating Ski Idaho and Ski the Northwest Rockies ski areas during the 2010-11 season subject to the resort blackout dates. 4. The Passport or use of the Passport or of lift tickets obtained with the Passport may not be transferred or resold to any other person, including family members or relatives.
    [Show full text]