DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Business Innovation Research (Sbir) & Small Business Technology Transfer (Sttr)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Business Innovation Research (Sbir) & Small Business Technology Transfer (Sttr) National Aeronautics and Space Administration SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) & SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) Fiscal Year 2017 General Solicitation Opening Date: November 17, 2016 Closing Date: January 20, 2017 Fiscal Year 2017 SBIR/STTR Solicitation Noteworthy Changes NASA SBIR/STTR Subtopic Workshop From September 12th to 13th of 2016, NASA held a Subtopic Workshop. This event was held to build NASA's relationship with the small business community and increase communication between NASA and potential proposers, and provide an opportunity for the small business community to explore and share ideas related to the general technical topic areas. Workshop content can be found at the following address: http://sbir.nasa.gov/events/2016-subtopic- workshop. 1.3 Three-Phase Program NASA is offering a separate opportunity for SBIR/STTR Phase II awardees (from any Agency) to submit applications to NASA’s FY17 Civilian Commercialization Readiness Pilot Program (CCRPP) related to NASA interests. Preliminary information about the CCRPP will be released in late 2016. The official release, including information related to the proposal requirements and evaluation criteria, will be posted in early 2017. 1.8 I-Corps The NASA SBIR/STTR Program is partnering with the National Science Foundation (NSF) to offer selected teams the opportunity for Phase I contractors to participate in the NSF Innovation Corps program (I-Corps TM) (hereinafter I-Corps). I-Corps educates teams on how to translate technologies from the lab into the marketplace. 4.3.2 Phase II Evaluation Criteria For Phase II proposals, commercial merit is a critical factor. As such, for Phase II proposals the scoring breakdown and weights have slightly changed. Commercialization had previously been rated as adjectival but will now contribute into proposals overall score at a weight of 5%. 9. Research Topics for SBIR and STTR The subtopics are being organized in a different way within Chapter 9 of the solicitation this year. Instead of being grouped by NASA Mission Directorate as in previous solicitations, subtopics are now being organized into groupings called “Focus Areas”. Focus areas are a way of grouping NASA interests and related technologies. This change is intended to make it easier for proposers to understand related needs across the agency and thus identify subtopics where their research and development capabilities may be a good match. If any proposer wishes to view subtopics as sorted by Mission Directorate, this listing will still be accessible on the website, but will not appear organized this way in Chapter 9 of the solicitation. 1. Program Description .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Program Management and Alignment ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Three-Phase Program .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Eligibility Requirements .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 NASA SBIR/STTR Technology Available (TAV) ................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Commercialization Technical Assistance ................................................................................................................ 5 1.7 NASA Mentor-Protégé Program (MPP) .................................................................................................................. 5 1.8 I-Corps ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.9 NASA Procurement Ombudsman Program ............................................................................................................. 6 1.10 General Information .............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Proposal Preparation Instructions and Requirements ......................................................................................... 8 3.1 Fundamental Considerations ................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Phase I Proposal Requirements................................................................................................................................ 8 3.3 Phase II Proposal Requirements ............................................................................................................................ 18 4. Method of Selection and Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................................... 29 4.1 Phase I Proposals ................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2 I-Corps ................................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.3 Phase II Proposals .................................................................................................................................................. 31 4.4 Debriefing of Unsuccessful Offerors ..................................................................................................................... 33 5. Considerations ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 5.1 Awards ................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5.2 Reporting ............................................................................................................................................................... 35 5.3 Payment Schedule .................................................................................................................................................. 35 5.4 Release of Proposal Information ............................................................................................................................ 35 5.5 Access to Proprietary Data by Non-NASA Personnel ........................................................................................... 35 5.6 Proprietary Information in the Proposal Submission ............................................................................................. 36 5.7 Rights in Data Developed Under SBIR Funding Agreements ............................................................................... 36 5.8 Copyrights ............................................................................................................................................................. 36 5.9 Patents, Invention Reporting, Election of Title and Patent Application Filing ...................................................... 37 5.10 Profit or Fee ......................................................................................................................................................... 37 5.11 Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships ............................................................................................................. 37 5.12 Essentially Equivalent Awards and Prior Work .................................................................................................. 37 5.13 Additional Information ........................................................................................................................................ 38 5.14 Required Registrations and Submissions ............................................................................................................. 38 5.15 False Statements .................................................................................................................................................. 42 6. Submission of Proposals ........................................................................................................................................ 43 6.1 Submission Requirements ..................................................................................................................................... 43 6.2 Submission Process ............................................................................................................................................... 43 6.3 Deadline for Phase I Proposal Receipt .................................................................................................................. 44 6.4 Deadline for Phase II Proposal Receipt ................................................................................................................. 44 6.5 Acknowledgment of Proposal Receipt .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Human Factors on Future Long Duration Human Space Exploration Missions En Route to Mars
    Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 13827 To cite this version : Ferraioli, Giuseppe and Causse, Mickael and Lizy-Destrez, Stéphanie and Gourinat, Yves Habitability of manned vehicules : the impact of human factors on future long duration human space exploration missions en route to Mars. (2015) In: 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China, September 23-27, 2013, 2013 - 2013 (Beijing, China). Any correspondance concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] HABITABILITY OF MANNED VEHICLES: THE IMPACT OF HUMAN FACTORS ON FUTURE LONG DURATION HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION MISSIONS EN ROUTE TO MARS Giuseppe Ferraioli ISAE - Institut Sup´erieurde l'A´eronautiqueet de l'Espace, Italy, [email protected] Dr. Mickael Causse ISAE, France, [email protected] Mrs. St´ephanie Lizy-Destrez ISAE, France, [email protected] Prof. Yves Gourinat ISAE, France, [email protected] August 3, 2013 Abstract Placing humans in space for a long duration mission beyond Earth's neighborhood implies the design of a highly complex system to travel, live and work safely in the hostile environment of deep space. In order to identify all the constraints from both engineering and human sides, a meticulous system engineering approach has to be followed and the human sciences, including incorporation of ideas from artists, ergonomists and psychologists, have to be integrated in the very early stages of the mission design.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitation Module 26 July 2016 – NASA Advisory Council, Human Exploration and Operations Committee
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Habitation Module 26 July 2016 – NASA Advisory Council, Human Exploration and Operations Committee Jason Crusan | Advanced Exploration Systems Director | NASA Headquarters 2 Human Exploration of Mars Is Hard Common Capability Needs Identified from Multiple Studies Days Reliable In-Space 800-1,100 44 min Transportation Total me crew is Maximum two- away from Earth – way communicaon for orbit missions all in 2me delay – 300 KW Micro-g and Radia2on Autonomous Opera2ons Total connuous transportaon power 130 t Heavy-LiA Mass 20-30 t Long Surface Stay Multiple Ability to 500 Days Launches per land large mission payloads Surface Operations Dust Toxicity and 100 km 11.2 km/s Long Range Explora2on Earth Entry Speed 20 t Oxygen produced for ascent to orbit - ISRU 3 The Habitation Development Challenge HABITATATION CAPABILITY Days 800-1,100 Habitation Systems – Total me crew is AES/ISS/STMD away from Earth – • Environmental Control & Life Support for orbit missions all in • Autonomous Systems Micro-g and Radia2on Integrated • EVA testing on ISS • Fire Safety • Radiation Protection Habitation Systems - Crew Health – HRP Long Surface Stay • Human Research 500 Days • Human Performance • Exercise PROVING GROUND Validation in cislunar space • Nutrition Habitation Capability– NextSTEP BAA / Int. Partners • Studies and ground prototypes of pressurized volumes 4 Specific Habitation Systems Objectives TODAY FUTURE Habitation The systems, tools, and protec:ons that allow Systems Elements humans to live and work
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 2018 (45th) The Next Great Steps Feb 28th, 9:00 AM NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway Tracy Gill NASA/KSC Technology Strategy Manager Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Gill, Tracy, "NASA's Lunar Orbital Platform-Gatway" (2018). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 17. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-2018-45th/presentations/17 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Lunar Orbital Platform- Gateway Tracy Gill NASA/Kennedy Space Center Exploration Research & Technology Programs February 28, 2018 45th Space Congress Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 LUNAR EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN 3 4 STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE EXPLORATION • FISCAL REALISM • ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Implementable in the near-term with the buying
    [Show full text]
  • Workstation Designs for a Cis-Lunar Deep Space Habitat
    Workstation Designs for a Cis-lunar Deep Space Habitat A. Scott Howe, PhD1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 Using the International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR) system, a suite of workstations required for deep space missions have been proposed to fill out habitation functions in an International Space Station (ISS) derived Cis-lunar Deep Space Habitat. This paper introduces the functional layout of the Cis-lunar habitat design, and describes conceptual designs for modular deployable work surfaces, General Maintenance Workstation (GMWS), In-Space Manufacturing Workstation (ISMW), Intra-Vehicular Activity Telerobotics Work Station (IVA-TRWS), and Galley / Wardroom. Nomenclature AES = NASA Advanced Exploration Systems project ATHLETE = All-Terrain Hex-Limbed Extra-Terrestrial Explorer robotic mobility system CTB = Cargo Transfer Bag D-RATS = NASA Desert Research and Technology Studies DSH = Deep Space Habitat EAM = Exploration Augmentation Module EXPRESS = EXpedite the PRocessing of Experiments for Space Station GMWS = General Maintenance Work Station HDU = Habitat Demonstration Unit HERA = Human Exploration Research Analog ISMW = In-Space Manufacturing Work Station ISPR = International Standard Payload Rack ISIS = International Subrack Interface Standard ISS = International Space Station IVA = Intravehicular Activity MPCV = Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle MPLM = Multi-Purpose Logistics Module PLSS = Personal Life Support System RAF = Random Access Frames TRWS = Telerobotics
    [Show full text]
  • Illini Mars Mission for the Opportunity to Revitalize the American Legacy
    Illini Mars Mission for the Opportunity to Revitalize The American Legacy Faculty Advisor: Steven J. D’Urso, M.S. Team Leads: Braven Leung and Christopher Lorenz Mohammed Alvi ● Alexander Case ● Andrew Clarkson ● Logan Damiani ● Shoham Das John Fuller ● Thomas Gordon ● Pranika Gupta ● Andrew Holm ● Guangting Lee ● Brandon Leung Scott Neuhoff ● Anthony Park ● Jeffrey Pekosh ● Sri Krishna Potukuchi ● Kelsey White 1 Table of Contents I. Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. Concept of Operations .......................................................................................................................... 3 III. Launch Vehicles ................................................................................................................................ 5 IV. Orbital Mechanics ............................................................................................................................. 6 V. Propulsion ............................................................................................................................................. 7 VI. Habitat Design ................................................................................................................................ 13 VII. Re-entry Technologies .................................................................................................................... 16 VIII. Power .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deployable Modular Frame for Inflatable Space Habitats
    70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Washington D.C., United States, 21-25 October 2019. Copyright ©2019 by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). All rights reserved. IAC-19,B3,8-GTS.2,4,x48931 DMF: Deployable Modular Frame for Inflatable Space Habitats Vittorio Netti1, * 1University of Houston, [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract Inflatable Space Modules for space exploration are now a reality. In 2016, Bigelow Aerospace tested the first inflatable module Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) on the International Space Station (ISS), achieving success. This technology has higher volume limits than other launchers, substantially changing the previous concepts of construction and life in space. Nevertheless, inflatable modules technology lacks a reliable and functional platform to efficiently use all this space. Due to its limited dimension, the International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR), currently used on ISS, is not suitable for this purpose. The project aims at developing a new standard for payload rack in the inflatable space modules: the Deployable Modular Frame (DMF). The DMF expands itself radially from the center of the module, starting from four structural pylons. It creates a solid infrastructure allowing for the configuration of a variety of spaces, including storage space, laboratories, workstations and living quarters. The DMF consists of two main parts: the Deployable Frame (DF) and the Modular Rack (MR). Once the frame is deployed, it provides four linear slots suitable to install the modular racks. The rack is the basic element that allows for the storage of equipment inside the frame. Once they are installed, the racks can slide on the frame’s rails, dynamically changing the space inside the module.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextstep Habitation
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Lunar Orbital Platform- Gateway Tracy Gill NASA/Kennedy Space Center Exploration Research & Technology Programs February 28, 2018 45th Space Congress Space Policy Directive-1 “Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.” 2 LUNAR EXPLORATION CAMPAIGN 3 4 STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES FOR SUSTAINABLE EXPLORATION • FISCAL REALISM • ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Implementable in the near-term with the buying power Opportunities for U.S. commercial business to further of current budgets and in the longer term with budgets enhance their experience and business base; commensurate with economic growth; • ARCHITECTURE OPENNESS AND RESILIENCE • SCIENTIFIC EXPLORATION Resilient architecture featuring multi-use, evolvable space Exploration enables science and science enables infrastructure, minimizing unique developments, with each exploration; leveraging scientific expertise for human mission leaving something behind to support subsequent exploration of the solar system. missions; • TECHNOLOGY PULL AND PUSH • GLOBAL COLLABORATION AND LEADERSHIP Application of high TRL technologies for near term Substantial new international and commercial missions,
    [Show full text]
  • TA07 Human Exploration Destination Systems
    NASA Technology Roadmaps Study Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, National Research Council Human Health and Surface Exploration Panel WORKSHOP Kriss J. Kennedy, Chair Support Team Members: Team Members: Peter Curreri Leslie Alexander Peggy Guirgis Mike Lowry (Rob Landis) John Sims Michael Tinker Diane Linne Brian Johnson Carole Mclemore Edgardo Santiago-Maldonado OCT Technology POC: Dr. Howard Ross Technology Coordinator: David L. Brown 27 April 2011 Briefing Package Contents • OCT & TA07 Process • TA07 HEDS Overview & Framework • Top Technical Challenges • Facility Needs Summary • Level-1 and Level-2 Roadmaps • State-of-the-Art, Current TRLs • Appendices – Technology Dependencies – Impact to National Needs DRAFT TA7 Space Technology Roadmap NRC TA6/TA7 Workshop April 2011 TA7-2 TA07 Human Exploration Destination Systems Executive Summary • I ASSUME everyone has read the TA7 Draft Roadmap Report! 30-page Report • Strategic Capabilities Roadmap • Exploration capabilities matured by “applied” technology investments • Level-1 Roadmap • Level-2 Roadmaps (not in report, in briefings) • Technology Level 4 & 5 in spreadsheet • Mission Pull Capabilities • Mission Push Capabilities • TRLs and Facilities • Mapped Dependencies on other technology areas • Mapped impacts to National Needs • Out-of-Scope to ID “what is funded” DRAFT TA7 Space Technology Roadmap NRC TA6/TA7 Workshop April 2011 TA7-3 TA07 Roadmap Definition Process Select Team Develop Work Develop Other TA Agency Of Experts Breakdown Structure Roadmap Implications Review TA7 HEDS
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Mission Sizing and Selection Methodology for Space Habitat Subsystems
    MULTI-MISSION SIZING AND SELECTION METHODOLOGY FOR SPACE HABITAT SUBSYSTEMS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Agathe Boutaud In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December 2019 Copyright c Agathe Boutaud 2019 MULTI-MISSION SIZING AND SELECTION METHODOLOGY FOR SPACE HABITAT SUBSYSTEMS Approved by: Dr. Dimitri Mavris, Advisor School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael Balchanos School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Olivia Pinon-Fischer School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: November 14, 2019 Earth is the cradle of humanity, but one cannot remain in the cradle forever. Konstantin Tsiolkovsky ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been achieved without the help and support of many people. I was lucky enough to be surrounded by a great team who helped me achieve my work. First of all, I would like to thank Dr. Dimitri Mavris, my advisor. I am very grateful for the opportunity you gave me to join ASDL. You provided me with an inspiring environment to grow and develop my skills, regularly offering me guidance for more than a year now. The projects I worked on were very diverse and helped me explore various areas to better define my path to the future. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Michael Balchanos and Dr. Olivia Pinon-Fischer. Dr. Balchanos, you helped me define my topic and you were constantly present throughout the process. You provided me with the bigger picture, hoping to de- velop a larger-scale project for space habitats design.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Habitat for Long Duration, Deep Space Missions
    GLEX-2012.05.3.8x12222 DEVELOPING A HABITAT FOR LONG DURATION, DEEP SPACE MISSIONS Michelle A. Rucker NASA Johnson Space Center, USA, [email protected] Shelby Thompson, Ph.D. Lockheed Martin/Johnson Space Center, USA, [email protected] One possible next leap in human space exploration for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is a mission to a near Earth asteroid (NEA). In order to achieve such an ambitious goal, a space habitat will need to accommodate a crew of four for the 380-day round trip. The Human Spaceflight Architecture Team (HAT) developed a conceptual design for such a habitat. The team identified activities that would be performed inside a long-duration, deep space habitat, and the capabilities needed to support such a mission. A list of seven functional activities/capabilities was developed: individual and group crew care, spacecraft and mission operations, subsystem equipment, logistics and resupply, and contingency operations. The volume for each activity was determined using NASA STD-3001 and the companion Human Integration Design Handbook (HIDH). Although, the sum of these volumes produced an over-sized spacecraft, the team evaluated activity frequency and duration to identify functions that could share a common volume without conflict, reducing the total volume by 24%. After adding 10% for growth, the resulting functional pressurized volume was calculated to be a minimum of 268 m3 (9,464 ft3) distributed over the functions. The work was validated through comparison to Mir, Skylab, the International Space Station (ISS), Bigelow Aerospace’s proposed habitat module, and NASA’s Trans-Hab concept.
    [Show full text]
  • SKYLAB II B Griffin Making a Deep Space Habitat from a Space Launch System Propellant Tank
    Future In-Space Operations Colloquium SKYLAB II B Griffin Making a Deep Space Habitat from a Space Launch System Propellant Tank March 27, 2013 Brand Griffin “Skylab II, Making a Deep Space Habitat from a Space Launch System Propellant Tank,” B. Griffin, D. Smitherman, K. Kennedy, L. Toups, T. Gill, and S. Howe, AIAA Space 2012 Conference, Pasadena, CA, September 11-13, 2012, AIAA 2012-5207 1 Habitat for Humans Beyond LEO B Griffin Deep Space Habitat Crew of 4 Three 60 day missions L4 Grow to 180 day missions EM L2 Moon L1 L3 ES L2 (Telescopes) Earth Different than ISS No rapid return Costly, infrequent reupply L5 More Hab than ISS Lab Skylab II Deep Space Habitat from an SLS Propellant Tank 2 2 Skylab moved astronauts out of the couch B Griffin • Post Apollo (used Apollo assets) • Launch mass 77,088 kg (169,950 lb) • First US Space Station • “Dry” Workshop (3rd stage propellant tank) • 1973 Saturn V launch (fully provisioned) • Included telescope, airlock and docking • Occupied by 3 crews, 3 astronauts each adaptor • Crew duration: 28, 59 and 84 days • LEO ~ 440 km altitude, 50° inclination • Last crew 1974, re-entered 1979 Airlock Module Orbital Work Shop Multiple Docking Adaptor Apollo Telescope Mount 03/27/2013 Skylab II Deep Space Habitat from an SLS Propellant Tank 3 Heavy Lift, Large Diameter, Single Launch B Griffin 03/27/2013 Skylab II Deep Space Habitat from an SLS Propellant Tank 4 SLS Upper Stage H2 Tank B Griffin 03/27/2013 Skylab II Deep Space Habitat from an SLS Propellant Tank 5 ISS-Derived Deep Space Habitat B Griffin
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Habitat for Long Duration, Deep Space Missions Michelle Rucker, NASA Johnson Space Center Dr
    Developing a Habitat for Long Duration, Deep Space Missions Michelle Rucker, NASA Johnson Space Center Dr. Shelby Thompson, Lockheed Martin . Problem Addressed: Spacecraft design is an iterative process. But where to begin? . Solution Proposed: “Bottoms Up” analysis to establish a point of departure volume and layout . Possible Applications: Used here to initially size a deep space habitat, but could be useful for initial estimates of other habitable spacecraft . Conclusions: Methodology produced a solution that fits within the bounds of historical spacecraft design precedent 23‐May‐2012 Global Space Exploration Conference, 2012 Page 1 Background and Issue . Mission . Design Reference Mission 34B . 157 days transit from Earth, followed by 30 days at NEA 2008EV5 and 193 day return to Earth • Crewed mission total of 380 days Cryo . 4‐crew Propulsion . Issue Stage . What size DSH to assume to Space start the design process? Exploration Vehicle Deep Space Habitat Solar Electric Propulsion 23‐May‐2012 Global Space Exploration Conference, 2012 Page 2 Approach Established Maximum Outer Diameter & Orientation Defined mission system functions . Volume required, Frequency, and Duration Combined Like Functions That Can Share Volume without Conflict Determined Module Length Needed for Estimated Functional Volume Developed Layout that: 1. Minimizes transit time between related crew stations 2. Accommodates expected levels of activity at each station 3. Isolates stations for health, safety, performance, and privacy 4. Provides a safe, efficient, and comfortable work/living environment 23‐May‐2012 Global Space Exploration Conference, 2012 Page 3 Establish Diameter and Orientation Make It Big Enough… Short/squat module offers more potential radiation protection than long/skinny module …But Not TOO Big Keep transportation constraints in mind .
    [Show full text]