Effects of Benzodiazepines on Sleep and Wakefulness

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Benzodiazepines on Sleep and Wakefulness Br. J. clin. Pharmac. (1981), 11, 31S-35S EFFECTS OF BENZODIAZEPINES ON SLEEP AND WAKEFULNESS T. ROTH, F. ZORICK, JEANNE SICKLESTEEL & E. STEPANSKI Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan The differential effects of short and long acting benzodiazepines on sleeping and waking behaviour are discussed, with particular reference to hypnotic efficacy, and their effects on the structure ofsleep and daytime function. Introduction THE evaluation of any drug requires an understand- et al., 1979), and triazolam (Metzler et al., 1977) have ing of the conditions in which it is going to be used come into clinical use. The present report will present clinically. In the case of hypnotics, the most appro- the differential effects of short- and long-acting ben- priate use is symptomatic relief for the complaint of zodiazepines on sleeping and waking behaviour. insomnia. To understand fully the safety and efficacy ofthese drugs, we must first be aware of the constella- tion of symptoms associated with the complaint of Sleep parameters insomnia, as well as what these drugs do to each of these symptoms. In evaluating the effects of hypnotics on sleep, two Insomnia is a complaint. Although all of the types of parameters should be considered. The first aetiological factors which give rise to this symptom set of parameters deal with hypnotic efficacy and are not currently well understood, there is an accepted include measures such as latency to sleep onset, total diagnostic system for the various disorders associated sleep time, number and duration of awakenings, and with disturbed nocturnal sleep (Association of Sleep sleep efficiency. The second set of parameters deal Disorder Centers, 1979). Whenever one of these dis- with sleep staging and include measures of the orders is diagnosed, the specific disorder should be amount of time spent in various sleep stages (that is 1, treated directly. However, when no diagnosis can be 2, 3-4 and REM), as well as the latency to stages 3-4 determined or if the insomnia is situational and/or and REM from sleep onset. time-limited, the problem can and should be dealt The differential effects of short- and long-acting with symptomatically. An important point in dealing benzodiazepines on hypnotic efficacy are illustrated with the symptomatic relief of insomnia is that in- by a study comparing estazolam (short-acting) and somnia is not simply difficulty with sleep or insuf- flurazepam (long-acting). A group of 18 insomniacs ficient sleep. Most insomniac patients feel that the were studied in a 14 d protocol. The first night served quality oftheir life, as reflected in their ability to work as an adaptation night, on nights 2-4 baseline record- productively and interact effectively, is seriously ings were obtained, on nights 5-11 active drug was compromized by their difficulties with sleep. Thus, in administered (nine subjects received estazolam 2 mg treating insomniac patients, a clinician must deal with and nine received flurazepam 15 mg), and finally, the patient's daytime functioning as well as their recovery was evaluated on nights 12-14. On all non- nocturnal sleep. Similarly, in evaluating hypnotic active drug nights placebo was administered, and the drugs, their effects on sleep as well as on daytime entire study was carried out using a double-blind functioning must be determined. procedure. The effects of flurazepam and estazolam In the symptomatic treatment of insomnia, benzo- on total sleep time and number of awakenings are diazepines are currently the drugs of choice. Unlike presented in Table 1. As can be seen, both of these the barbiturates, benzodiazepines do not produce compounds significantly decreased the number of tolerance with nightly usage, and there is little risk of awakenings and increased total sleep time with one death associated with overdosing. Most of the benzo- week of nightly administration. However, only the diazepines which were first developed, such as flura- short-acting compound showed significant hypnotic zepam, are long-acting compounds (Kaplan et effects with only a single night of administration. al., 1973). Recently, short-acting benzodiazepine With long-acting compounds, multiple nights of drug hypnotics, with half-lives of less than 12 h, such as administration, and therefore drug accumulation, are estazolam (Nakajima et al., 1971),, temazepam (Roth necessary to achieve significant hypnotic efficacy. 0306-5251/81/130031-05 $01.00 ) Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1981 32S T. ROTH, F. ZORICK, JEANNE SICKLESTEEL & E. STEPANSKI Table I The effects of estazolam and flurazepam on total sleep time and number of awakenings Condition: Baseline FirstDrug OverallDrug Recovery Study night: 2-4 5 5-11 12-14 Flurazepam 15mg Total sleep time 397 409 433t 428* Number of awakenings 13 11 9* 8t Estazolam 2 mg Total sleep time 382 436t 428t 372 Number of awakenings 11 5t 5t 7* * Significantly different from baseline P<0.05; t significantly different from baseline P<0.01. Similarly, drug accumulation is demonstrated by also of interest to note that although neither com- hypnotic efficacy with flurazepam on the withdrawal pound significantly affected the latency to stage 3-4, nights and a return to baseline with estazolam. Thus, the long-acting drug significantly suppressed the total longer-acting drugs like flurazepam are characterized percentage of stage 3-4. by drug build-up for the first couple of active drug Another major difference between the two drugs nights and a carry-over of drug activity into the re- was their effect on sleep stages during the post-drug covery period. Short-acting drugs like estazolam pro- recovery period. Ketazolam sinificantly affected the duce their maximal effect with a single night of latency to REM, percentage REM and percentage administration and a return to baseline as soon as 34 on the first 3 recovery nights. Triazolam, on the drug is discontinued. other hand, did not have a significant effect on any of The differential effects of short- and long-acting these parameters during the recovery period. This benzodiazepines on sleep stages are illustrated by two indicates that the longer half-life ofketazolam is asso- studies carried out in-our laboratory. In the first study, ciated with a build-up of active drug which in turn is 0.5 mg of triazolam, a benzodiazepine with a half-life associated with a carry-over of sleep suppression for of 4.5-5 h (10) was administered to eight insomniac several days after discontinuation of the drug. subjects for 14 consecutive nights. Ketazolam, a ben- zodiazepine with a half-life of 14 h (4), was admin- istered to eight insomniac subjects for 7 consecutive Performance parameters nights in a second study. Both studies were double- blind and each had, in addition to the period of drug Since patients who complain of insomnia also com- administration, a baseline (placebo) and recovery plain of disturbed daytime functioning and since (placebo) period. These results are presented in sedative hypnotics are known to affect daytime func- Table 2. tioning, their proper evaluation requires examination Both triazolam and ketazolam significantly in- of their daytime effects. The evaluation of daytime creased the latency to REM sleep in comparison with functioning should include a battery of several dif- baseline. However, only ketazolam administration ferent types of tests. A battery of different tests is was associated with a significant decrease in the per- desirable as different drugs may affect different centage of REM. These findings demonstrate that waking functions. Also, the myriad of daily activities although both compounds affected REM latency, the (for example, driving, problem solving, and so on) drug with the longest half-life significantly suppressed routinely performed cannot be evaluated using a the total percentage of REM across the night. It is single test. An ideal battery should consist of the Table 2 Percentage change from placebo condition using ketazolam and triazolam Ketazolam Triazolam Drug days Drug days Recovery days Drug days Drug days Recovery days 17-3 5-7 1-3 1-3 12-14 1-3 Percentage REM -21 * -22* -11* -13 -09 0 Latency to REM +61 * +64* +30* +56* +72* +04 Percentage stage 3-4 -07 -35* -29* +13 +08 +03 Latency to stage 3-4 +10 +21 +33 +21 +25 +34 * Significantly different from placebo P<0.05. BENZODIAZEPINES & SLEEP AND WAKEFULNESS 33S +1.0 2:00 am 8:30 am 9:00 pm 3.5 h after drug 10 h after drug 22.5 h after drug +0.5 S placelbo levFel 0 T. F30 l -0.5 ~~~~~~T2 F30 -1.0 | | ~F30 F30 -1.5 -2.0 l T.50lll -2.5 T.25 = Triazolam .25 mg F30 = Flurazepam 30 mg S = Secobarbital 100 mg T.50 = Triazolam .50 mg F15 - Flurazepam 15 mg Figure 1 Effects oftriazolam 0.25 mg (T.25) and 0.50 mg (T.50), fiurazepam 30 mg (F30) and 15 mg (Fl 5), and secobarbital 100 mg (S) on performance expressed as Z scores. following types of tasks: simple motor, gross co- and 2100 (22.0 post-drug ingestion). The perfonnance ordination, reaction time, cognitive, vigilance, and battery consisted of: (1) pursuit rotor, a test of eye- memory. This battery of tests should be performed hand coordination in which subjects must keep a several times in the 24 h following drug ingestion. The stylus in contact with a rotating disk; (2) purdue first test should be performed at a time when peak pegboard, another test of eye-hand coordination in blood levels of the drug are expected so as to gain which subjects are required to place pegs onto a information about the maximum degree of impair- board; (3) continuous arithmetic, a test of simple ment that can be anticipated. The next testing should arithmetic ability (addition and subtraction be performed in the morning to determine if patients problems); (4) digit symbol substitution test, a test of taking the medication experience any morning cognitive ability in which subjects are required to "hang-over".
Recommended publications
  • Early Morning Insomnia, Daytime Anxiety, and Organic Mental Disorder Associated with Triazolam
    Early Morning Insomnia, Daytime Anxiety, and Organic Mental Disorder Associated with Triazolam Tjiauw-Ling Tan, MD, Edward 0. Bixler, PhD, Anthony Kales, MD, Roger J. Cadieux, MD, and Amy L. Goodman, MD Hershey, Pennsylvania A psychiatric syndrome characterized by agita­ Sleep Disorders Clinic. He began taking triazolam tion, paranoid ideation, depersonalization, and de­ at bedtime in a 0.5-mg dose eight months before pression, as well as paresthesias and hyperacusis, his referral. Although the drug was effective ini­ has been attributed to administration of triazolam tially, tolerance developed, causing the patient to (Halcion).1 The occurrence of these reactions led gradually increase the dosage until eventually he to the removal of the drug from the market in the was taking a total of 1.5 mg nightly. Netherlands. Isolated behavioral side effects that The physical examination revealed no contribu­ include amnesia2-4 and hallucinations5 have also tory conditions. However, assessment of the pa­ been reported with administration of triazolam. tient’s mental status revealed that he was extreme­ Rebound insomnia6 and early morning insom­ ly guarded and suspicious and preoccupied with nia,7 both associated with increases in daytime his sleeplessness to the degree that this hypochon­ anxiety,7,8 are withdrawal syndromes known driacal concern had a delusional quality. He also to occur with rapidly eliminated benzodiazepine described two episodes indicating memory impair­ hypnotics such as triazolam. Rebound insomnia ment; both incidents occurred in the late afternoon consists of a marked increase in wakefulness and involved preparing to eat certain foods, which above baseline levels following drug withdrawal.
    [Show full text]
  • Triazolam (Halcion®) Instructions
    Mark Sebastian, DMD 33516 Ninth Ave. South, #2 Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 941-6242 --or -- (253) 952-2005 [email protected] www.MarkSebastianDMD.com Triazolam (Halcion®) instructions If prescribed, take the diazepam (Valium®) pill just before bed the night before your dental surgery for a better night’s sleep. If you take other sleeping medications, take those instead of the diazepam (Valium®). Do not mix the two. If you have a morning appointment, you should to fast from solid foods after midnight. If you have an afternoon appointment, have a light breakfast. Unless you have a medical reason to eat (diabetic, etc.), do not eat anything for 6 hours before your appointment time. Water, apple juice, and black decaffeinated coffee/tea are OK for 3 hours before your appointment. Triazolam (Halcion®) is absorbed better on an empty stomach. Do not take caffeine or sugar) for 3 hours before your appointment, as all are stimulants that decrease the effectiveness of triazolam (Halcion®). No tobacco use for 8 hours before, as it is a stimulant. Take the triazolam (Halcion®) or diazepam (Valium®) pill(s) with a glass of water. Sparkling water makes them absorb better. Alcohol---do not drink within 24 hours before to 24 hours after taking triazolam (Halcion®) or diazepam (Valium®). Recreational/illegal drugs---Do not use for 7 days before your dental surgery and until 7 days after (never if you are taking narcotic pain medication). Example—using cocaine and then having local anesthetics (novocaine) can kill you. Do not take triazolam (Halcion®) or diazepam (Valium®) if you are allergic to triazolam (Halcion®), alprazolam (Xanax®), chlordiazepoxide (Librium®, Librax®), clonazepam (Klonopin®), clorazepate (Tranxene®), diazepam (Valium®), estazolam (ProSom®), flurazepam (Dalmane®), lorazepam (Ativan®), oxazepam (Serax®), prazepam (Centrax®), temazepam (Restoril®).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Short-And Long-Acting Benzodiazepine-Receptor Agonists
    J Pharmacol Sci 107, 277 – 284 (2008)3 Journal of Pharmacological Sciences ©2008 The Japanese Pharmacological Society Full Paper Comparison of Short- and Long-Acting Benzodiazepine-Receptor Agonists With Different Receptor Selectivity on Motor Coordination and Muscle Relaxation Following Thiopental-Induced Anesthesia in Mice Mamoru Tanaka1, Katsuya Suemaru1,2,*, Shinichi Watanabe1, Ranji Cui2, Bingjin Li2, and Hiroaki Araki1,2 1Division of Pharmacy, Ehime University Hospital, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan 2Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Neuroscience, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan Received November 7, 2007; Accepted May 15, 2008 Abstract. In this study, we compared the effects of Type I benzodiazepine receptor–selective agonists (zolpidem, quazepam) and Type I/II non-selective agonists (zopiclone, triazolam, nitrazepam) with either an ultra-short action (zolpidem, zopiclone, triazolam) or long action (quazepam, nitrazepam) on motor coordination (rota-rod test) and muscle relaxation (traction test) following the recovery from thiopental-induced anesthesia (20 mg/kg) in ddY mice. Zolpidem (3 mg/kg), zopiclone (6 mg/kg), and triazolam (0.3 mg/kg) similarly caused an approximately 2-fold prolongation of the thiopental-induced anesthesia. Nitrazepam (1 mg/kg) and quazepam (3 mg/kg) showed a 6- or 10-fold prolongation of the anesthesia, respectively. Zolpidem and zopiclone had no effect on the rota-rod and traction test. Moreover, zolpidem did not affect motor coordination and caused no muscle relaxation following the recovery from the thiopental-induced anesthesia. However, zopiclone significantly impaired the motor coordination at the beginning of the recovery. Triazolam significantly impaired the motor coordination and muscle relaxant activity by itself, and these impairments were markedly exacerbated after the recovery from anesthesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Red with Nitrazepam and Placebo in Acute Emergency Driving Situations and in Monotonous Simulated Driving
    109 A 1986 The Carry-over Effects of Triazolam Compa- red with Nitrazepam and Placebo in Acute Emergency Driving Situations and in Mono- tonous Simulated Driving Hans Laurell and Jan Törnroos Reprint from Acta Pharmacologica et toxicologica 1986 v Väg06/7 Efi/( Statens väg- och trafikinstitut (VTI) * 581 01 Linköping [St]tlltet Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute * S-581 01 Linköping Sweden Acta pharmacol. et toxicol. 1986, 58, 182186. From the National Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute, (V.T.I.), S-58 101 Linköping, Sweden The Carry-over Effects of Triazolam Compared with Nitrazepam and Placebo in Acute Emergency Driving Situations and in Monotonous Simulated Driving Hans Laurell and Jan Törnros (Received October 9, 1985; Accepted January 9, 1986) Abstract: Eighteen healthy volunteers of both sexes, aged 2034, were tested in the morning while undertaking real car driving avoidance manoeuvres and during monotonous simulated driving after 1 and 3 nights of medication with triazolam 0.25 mg, nitrazepam 5 mg or placebo. The study was a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, where a minimum of 7 days wash-out separated the 3 treatment periods. Nitrazepam was found to impair performance in the simulated task after 1 but not after 3 nights of medication. Performance in the triazolam condition was not signicantly different from the other conditions on this task on either day. However, after one night of medication triazolam tended to score worse than placebo but better than nitrazepam. In real car driving a tendency was noted for nitrazepam to score worst, whereas the difference between placebo and triazolam was hardly noticeable.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Sedation Instructions
    Following your child’s appointment (Cont’d) DIET DO NOT feed your child until he/she is completely awake. Begin feeding with clear, pulp-free liquids such as water, apple juice, jello, popsicles or “sports” drinks. Start your child on semi-solid foods (such as soup, noodles, porridge, INSTRUCTIONS FOR PATIENTS WHO WILL BE oatmeal) for easy chewing and digestion. Only feed your child if RECEIVING ORAL SEDATION he/she is hungry and has tolerated clear liquids without vomiting. Avoid feeding your child large portions of food or fatty foods such as French fries. Goals of conscious sedation If your child vomits, stop feeding for 30-60 minutes then gradually resume clear fluids in sips. The goals of sedation in the pediatric patient for diagnostic and therapeutic Normal diet can be resumed as soon as he/she is ready for it. procedures are: 1) to guard the patient’s safety and welfare; 2) to minimize physical discomfort and pain; 3) to control anxiety, minimize psychological PAIN trauma, and maximize the potential for amnesia; 4) to control behavior and/or movement so as to allow the safe completion of the procedure; and 5) You will be notified if local anesthetic has been used during the to return the patient to a state in which safe discharge from medical procedure. It usually takes 2-3 hours to completely wear off. Make supervision, as determined by recognized criteria, is possible. sure you monitor your child closely to avoid any soft tissue trauma. The sedatives If he/she complains of pain, regular strength children’s Tylenol or Advil/Motrin is usually sufficient.
    [Show full text]
  • HYPAM Tablet Contains 0.125 Mg Or 0.25 Mg of Triazolam
    NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET HYPAM 1. Product Name HYPAM, 0.125 mg, 0.25mg, tablets. 2. Qualitative and Quantitative Composition Each HYPAM tablet contains 0.125 mg or 0.25 mg of triazolam. HYPAM tablets contain lactose. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. Pharmaceutical Form HYPAM 0.125mg tablets are oval, flat, bevelled edged white tablets marked TZ on one side and scored on the other. HYPAM 0.25mg tablets are oval, flat, bevelled edged blue tablets marked TZ on one side and scored on the other. Dimensions (both strengths): 7.9mm x 5.6mm. The score line is not intended for breaking the tablet. 4. Clinical Particulars 4.1 Therapeutic indications Triazolam is useful in the management of patients with transient up to 7 days, and short term 2 to 4 weeks, severe or disabling insomnia. It is also useful as a short term, intermittent adjunctive treatment in the management of selected patients with long term insomnia. 4.2 Dose and method of administration Dose The lowest effective dose of triazolam should be used. Treatment with triazolam should not exceed 7-10 consecutive days. Use for more than 2-3 consecutive weeks requires complete re-evaluation of the patient. The starting dose in all patients should be 0.125mg; for many patients this dose immediately before retiring should be sufficient. A dose of 0.25mg should not be exceeded. For elderly or debilitated patients and patients with disturbed liver/kidney function, the dose should not exceed 0.125mg before retiring. The 0.25mg dose should be used only for exceptional patients who do not respond to a trial of the lower dose.
    [Show full text]
  • Chloral Hydrate: Summary Report
    Chloral Hydrate: Summary Report Item Type Report Authors Yuen, Melissa V.; Gianturco, Stephanie L.; Pavlech, Laura L.; Storm, Kathena D.; Yoon, SeJeong; Mattingly, Ashlee N. Publication Date 2020-02 Keywords Compounding; Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Section 503B; Food and Drug Administration; Outsourcing facility; Drug compounding; Legislation, Drug; United States Food and Drug Administration; Chloral Hydrate Rights Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 26/09/2021 09:06:16 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10713/12087 Summary Report Chloral Hydrate Prepared for: Food and Drug Administration Clinical use of bulk drug substances nominated for inclusion on the 503B Bulks List Grant number: 2U01FD005946 Prepared by: University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) University of Maryland School of Pharmacy February 2020 This report was supported by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award (U01FD005946) totaling $2,342,364, with 100 percent funded by the FDA/HHS. The contents are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement by, the FDA/HHS or the U.S. Government. 1 Table of Contents REVIEW OF NOMINATION ..................................................................................................... 4 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Triazolam | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    PATIENT & CAREGIVER EDUCATION Triazolam This information from Lexicomp® explains what you need to know about this medication, including what it’s used for, how to take it, its side effects, and when to call your healthcare provider. Brand Names: US Halcion Warning This drug is a benzodiazepine. The use of a benzodiazepine drug along with opioid drugs has led to very bad side effects. Side effects that have happened include slowed or trouble breathing and death. Opioid drugs include drugs like codeine, oxycodone, and morphine. Opioid drugs are used to treat pain and some are used to treat cough. Talk with the doctor. If you are taking this drug with an opioid drug, get medical help right away if you feel very sleepy or dizzy; if you have slow, shallow, or trouble breathing; or if you pass out. Caregivers or others need to get medical help right away if the patient does not respond, does not answer or react like normal, or will not wake up. Benzodiazepines can put you at risk for addiction, abuse, and misuse. Misuse or abuse of this drug can lead to overdose or death, especially when used along with certain other drugs, alcohol, or street drugs. Addiction can happen even if you take this drug as your doctor has told you. Get medical help right away if you have changes in mood or behavior, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, or trouble breathing. You will be watched closely to make sure you do not misuse, abuse, or become addicted to this drug. Triazolam 1/7 Benzodiazepines may cause dependence.
    [Show full text]
  • Zopiclone Produces Effects on Human Performance Similar to Flurazepam, Lormetazepam and Triazolam
    Br. J. clin. Pharmac. (1986), 21, 647-653 Zopiclone produces effects on human performance similar to flurazepam, lormetazepam and triazolam A. N. GRIFFITHS', D. M. JONES2 & A. RICHENS1 'Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff and 2Department of Applied Psychology, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff 1 The cognitive function and psychomotor performance of 10 healthy male volunteers were measured following single oral doses of: zopiclone (7.5 mg), flurazepam (15 mg), lormetazepam (1 mg), triazolam (0.25 mg) and placebo. 2 The performance tests selected (stroop task, five choice serial reaction time, memory span, logical reasoning, mood and saccadic eye movement analysis) were thought to reflect aspects of normal daily activity. 3 The tests demonstrated a clear reduction of performance for all active treatments. No drug emerged as the most potent sedative overall, as each of the tests was affected to a different degree by each drug. 4 Drug effects were not qualitatively different between active treatments so that zopi- clone was indistinguishable from the three benzodiazepines with which it was compared. Keywords zopiclone benzodiazepines human performance saccadic eye movements Introduction Zopiclone is a cyclopyrrolone derivative which, (7.5 mg) has been shown to be effective as an although structurally unrelated to the benzodia- hypnotic (Wickstrom & Giercksky, 1980), zepines, shares their pharmacological profile. and furthermore, Lader & Denney (1983) Binding studies have shown that zopiclone binds reported this dose to be the preferred hypnotic to brain benzodiazepine receptors but is not dose. recognised by peripheral (renal) benzodiazepine The marketed benzodiazepines selected for receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault in the U.S
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Estimate of the Incidence of Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault in the U.S. Document No.: 212000 Date Received: November 2005 Award Number: 2000-RB-CX-K003 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. AWARD NUMBER 2000-RB-CX-K003 ESTIMATE OF THE INCIDENCE OF DRUG-FACILITATED SEXUAL ASSAULT IN THE U.S. FINAL REPORT Report prepared by: Adam Negrusz, Ph.D. Matthew Juhascik, Ph.D. R.E. Gaensslen, Ph.D. Draft report: March 23, 2005 Final report: June 2, 2005 Forensic Sciences Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences (M/C 865) College of Pharmacy University of Illinois at Chicago 833 South Wood Street Chicago, IL 60612 ABSTRACT The term drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) has been recently coined to describe victims who were given a drug by an assailant and subsequently sexually assaulted. Previous studies that have attempted to determine the prevalence of drugs in sexual assault complainants have had serious biases. This research was designed to better estimate the rate of DFSA and to examine the social aspects surrounding it. Four clinics were provided with sexual assault kits and asked to enroll sexual assault complainants.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Toxic Effects of Club Drugs
    Club drugs p. 1 © Journal of Psychoactive Drugs Vol. 36 (1), September 2004, 303-313 Acute Toxic Effects of Club Drugs Robert S. Gable, J.D., Ph.D.* Abstract—This paper summarizes the short-term physiological toxicity and the adverse behavioral effects of four substances (GHB, ketamine, MDMA, Rohypnol®)) that have been used at late-night dance clubs. The two primary data sources were case studies of human fatalities and experimental studies with laboratory animals. A “safety ratio” was calculated for each substance based on its estimated lethal dose and its customary recreational dose. GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) appears to be the most physiologically toxic; Rohypnol® (flunitrazepam) appears to be the least physiologically toxic. The single most risk-producing behavior of club drug users is combining psychoactive substances, usually involving alcohol. Hazardous drug-use sequelae such as accidents, aggressive behavior, and addiction were not factored into the safety ratio estimates. *Professor of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA. Please address correspondence to Robert Gable, 2738 Fulton Street, Berkeley, CA 94705, or to [email protected]. Club drugs p. 2 In 1999, the National Institute on Drug Abuse launched its Club Drug Initiative in order to respond to dramatic increases in the use of GHB, ketamine, MDMA, and Rohypnol® (flunitrazepam). The initiative involved a media campaign and a 40% increase (to $54 million) for club drug research (Zickler, 2000). In February 2000, the Drug Enforcement Administration, in response to a Congressional mandate (Public Law 106-172), established a special Dangerous Drugs Unit to assess the abuse of and trafficking in designer and club drugs associated with sexual assault (DEA 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • A Drug Use Evaluation of Bedtime Sedation in Geriatric Patients
    The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy- Volume 47, No. 5, October, 1994 197 A Drug Use Evaluation of Bedtime Sedation in Geriatric Patients Janet W. Demsey ABSTRACT RESUME A pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility of On a effectue un projet pilote pour voir si on pouvait a shared regional drug use evaluation (DUE) program implanter un programme regional d'evaluation de involving patients. A retrospective DUE on the use of ! 'utilisation des medicaments par !es patients ages. benzadiazepines, chloral hydrate and neuroleptics On a procede pour cela a une analyse retrospective for bedtime sedation was performed on geriatric de !'utilisation des benzadiazepines, de !'hydrate de patient populations from two hospitals. Regional chloral et des neuroleptiques par des patients ages de program staff coordinated the DUE, including deux hopitaux, au coucher, en guise d'hypnotique. Le development of the criteria and chart review. The personnel du programme regional a coordonne participating Pharmacy departments performed the l'exercice, etabli les criteres d'evaluation et.revu Les internal administrative and Pharmacy and dossiers. Les departements de pharmacie participants Therapeutics committee communications. se sont occupes des communications entre Forty patient charts from two sites were reviewed. !'administration et le Comite de pharmacologie. The DUE results indicated different rates ofdrug use Les dossiers de 40 patients ant ete examines aux and discontinuation of therapy between the two deux endroits. Les resultats revelent des taux geriatric patient populations. The overall rates of differents d'utilisaton des medicaments et d' abandon inappropriate drug use were similar. One undesirable du traitement pour Les deux populations de patients clinical outcome occurred.
    [Show full text]