DOCSLIB.ORG

Sec408alligatorbpsfinaldraftea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sec408alligatorbpsfinaldraftea DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUMP STATION ALLIGATOR BAYOU PUMP STATION NO. 16, PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TEXAS, HURRICANE FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT PORT ARTHUR, JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS JEFFERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NOVEMBER 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................................. iv LIST OF ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORITY ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................ 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED OF PROJECT ....................................................................... 4 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS .....................................................................................6 2.1 ALTERNATIVE 1: NO ACTION ........................................................................6 2.2 ALTERNATIVE 2: PROPOSED PROJECT .......................................................6 2.3 OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .......................................................10 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .... 10 3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................10 3.1.1 Geology and Soils ................................................................................10 3.1.2 Water Resources and Water Quality ....................................................12 3.1.3 Floodplain Management (Executive Order 11988) ....................................... 13 3.1.4 Climate and Air Quality ................................................................................ 14 3.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................. 17 3.2.1 Terrestrial and Aquatic Environment...................................................17 3.2.2 Wetlands (Executive Order 11990) .....................................................18 3.2.3 Threatened or Endangered Species ......................................................21 3.3 HAZARDOUS, TOXIC, AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE (HTRW) ........................ 23 3.3.1 National Priority List Database ..................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Database ......................................................... 23 3.3.3 Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Database ........................................................................................................ 25 3.3.4 Emergency Response Notification System Database .................................... 25 3.3.5 Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program and the Texas Innocent Owner/Operator Program ............................................................... 25 3.3.6 Texas State Superfund Database ................................................................... 26 3.3.7 TCEQ Solid Waste Facilities and Unauthorized and Unpermitted Landfill Sites ................................................................................................. 26 3.3.8 Underground or Aboveground Storage Tanks .............................................. 26 3.3.9 TCEQ Spills List ........................................................................................... 27 3.3.10 Brownfields ................................................................................................... 27 3.3.11 Dry Cleaners .................................................................................................. 27 Sec408AlligatorBPSFinalDraftEA8Nov12 ii 3.3.12 No Action Alternative ................................................................................... 27 3.3.13 Proposed Project Alternative ......................................................................... 27 3.4 SOCIOECONOMICS ................................................................................................ 27 3.4.1 Zoning and Land Use ...........................................................................28 3.4.2 Visual Resources ..................................................................................28 3.4.3 Noise ....................................................................................................28 3.4.4 Public Services and Utilities ................................................................28 3.4.5 Traffic and Circulation .........................................................................28 3.4.6 Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898) .................................31 3.4.7 Safety and Security ..............................................................................31 3.4.8 No Action Alternative ..........................................................................32 3.4.9 Proposed Project Alternative ...............................................................32 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES....................................................................................... 32 3.5.1 No Action Alternative ..........................................................................33 3.5.2 Proposed Project Alternative ...............................................................33 4.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ......................................................................................33 5.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .....................................................................................34 6.0 MITIGATION, INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS, MONITORING, AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLANS ......................................................................... 35 7.0 COORDINATION .....................................................................................................36 8.0 REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................37 Sec408AlligatorBPSFinalDraftEA8Nov12 iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 FEDERALLY LISTED T/E SPECIES OF POTENTIAL OCCURRENCE IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS ................................................................................................................. 21 2 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SEARCH REPORT FINDINGS .................. 24 3 IN-SERVICE PIPELINES WITHIN 0.5 MILES OF THE PROJECT AREA ....................... 29 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 VICINITY MAP........................................................................................................................ 2 2 2006 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH................................................................................................ 3 3 DRAINAGE AREA PROPOSED PUMP STATION ............................................................... 5 4 PLAN VIEW OF PROPOSED PUMP STATION .................................................................... 8 5 CROSS-SECTION OF PROPOSED PUMP STATION ........................................................... 9 6 SOILS MAP ............................................................................................................................ 11 7 FEMA FLOOD HAZARD MAP ............................................................................................ 15 8 IMPACT ANALYSIS MAP ................................................................................................... 20 9 OIL/GAS WELL AND PIPELINE LOCATIONS .................................................................. 30 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A AGENCY COORDINATION A.1 USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE A.2 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS A.3 TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY A.4 TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE A.5 US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE A.6 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE A.7 TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT A.8 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION A.9 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY A.10 APPENDIX A AGENCY LETTER ATTACHMENTS B ON-SITE PHOTOGRAPHS C BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT D PUBLIC COORDINATION E MITIGATION, INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS, MONITORING, AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLANS F RELATIVE SEA LEVEL RISE CALCULATION G ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY H RESPONSES TO COMMENTS I HABITAT EVALUATION PROCEDURE ANALYSIS Sec408AlligatorBPSFinalDraftEA8Nov12 iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ac – acre APE – Area of Potential Effect ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials BA – Biological Assessment CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality CESQGs – Conditionally Exempt, Small-Quantity Generators CFR – Code of Federal Regulations CH – Critical Habitat CORRACT – Corrective Action CWA – Clean Water Act cy – cubic yards DD7 – Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7 DM – Design Memorandum DRYC – Dry Cleaning EA – Environmental Assessment EFH – Essential Fish Habitat EPA – US Environmental Protection Agency ER – Engineering Regulation ERNS – Emergency Response Notification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Water Resources Institute Annual Technical Report FY 2007
    Texas Water Resources Institute Annual Technical Report FY 2007 Texas Water Resources Institute Annual Technical Report FY 2007 1 Introduction The Texas Water Resources Institute (TWRI), a unit of Texas AMAgriLife, and member of the National Institutes for Water Resources, provides leadership in working to stimulate priority research and Extension educational programs in water resources. Texas AgriLife Research and the Texas AgriLife Extension Service provide administrative support for TWRI and the Institute is housed on the campus of Texas AMUniversity. TWRI thrives on collaborations and partnerships currently managing more than 70 projects, involving some 150 faculty members from across the state. The Institute maintains joint projects with 14 Texas universities and two out−of−state universities; more than 40 federal, state and local governmental organizations; more than 20 consulting engineering firms, commodity groups and environmental organizations; and numerous others. In fiscal year 2007, TWRI obtained more than $5.5 million in funding and managed more than $20 million in active projects. TWRI works closely with agencies and stakeholders to provide research−derived, science−based information to help answer diverse water questions and also to produce communications to convey critical information and to gain visibility for its cooperative programs. Looking to the future, TWRI awards scholarships to graduate students at Texas AMUniversity through funding provided by the W.G. Mills Endowment and awards grants to graduate students from Texas universities with funds provided by the U.S. Geological Survey. Introduction 1 Research Program Introduction Through the funds provided by the U.S. Geological Survey, the Texas Water Resources Institute (TWRI) funded 10 research projects for 2007−08 conducted by graduate students at Texas AMUniversity (4 projects), Texas Tech University (2), Rice University (1), Baylor University (1) and the University of Texas at Austin (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • 28.6-ACRE WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 28.6 ACRES of Leisure on the La Buena Vida Texas Coastline
    La Buena Rockport/AransasVida Pass, Texas 78336 La Buena Vida 28.6-ACRE WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 28.6 ACRES Of leisure on the La Buena Vida Texas coastline. ROCKPORT/ARANSAS PASS EXCLUSIVE WATERFRONT COMMUNITY ACCESSIBILITY Adjacent to Estes Flats, Redfish Bay & Aransas Bay, popular salt water fishing spots for Red & Black drum Speckled Trout, and more. A 95-acre residential enclave with direct channel access to the Intracoastal IDEAL LOCATION Waterway, Redfish Bay, and others Nestled between the two recreational’ sporting towns of Rockport & Aransas Pass. LIVE OAK COUNTRY CLUB TX-35 35 TEXAS PALM HARBOR N BAHIA BAY ISLANDS OF ROCKORT LA BUENA VIDA 35 TEXAS CITY BY THE SEA TX-35 35 TEXAS ARANSAS BAY GREGORY PORT ARANSAS ARANSAS McCAMPBELL PASS PORTER AIRPORT 361 SAN JOSE ISLAND 361 361 INGLESIDE INGLESIDE ON THE BAY REDFISH BAY PORT ARANSAS MUSTANG BEACH AIRPORT SPREAD 01 At Home in Rockport & Aransas Pass Intimate & Friendly Coastal Community RECREATIONAL THRIVING DESTINATION ARTS & CULTURE Opportunity for fishing, A strong artistic and waterfowl hunting, cultural identity boating, water sports, • Local art center camping, hiking, golf, etc. • Variety of galleries • Downtown museums • Cultural institutions NATURAL MILD WINTERS & PARADISE WARM SUMMERS Featuring some of the best Destination for “Winter birdwatching in the U.S. Texans,” those seeking Home to Aransas National reprieve from colder Wildlife Refuge, a protected climates. haven for the endangered Whooping Crane and many other bird and marine species. SPREAD 02 N At Home in Rockport & Aransas Pass ARANSAS COUNTY AREA ATTRACTIONS & AIRPORT AMENITIES FULTON FULTON BEACH HARBOUR LIGHT PARK SALT LAKE POPEYES COTTAGES PIZZA HUT HAMPTON INN IBC BANK THE INN AT ACE HARDWARE FULTON ELEMENTARY FULTON HARBOUR SCHOOL ENROLLMENT: 509 THE LIGHTHOUSE INN - ROCKPORT FM 3036 BROADWAY ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach and Bay Access Guide
    Texas Beach & Bay Access Guide Second Edition Texas General Land Office Jerry Patterson, Commissioner The Texas Gulf Coast The Texas Gulf Coast consists of cordgrass marshes, which support a rich array of marine life and provide wintering grounds for birds, and scattered coastal tallgrass and mid-grass prairies. The annual rainfall for the Texas Coast ranges from 25 to 55 inches and supports morning glories, sea ox-eyes, and beach evening primroses. Click on a region of the Texas coast The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on these maps, or the data from which it was produced. These maps are NOT suitable for navigational purposes and do not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land. Contents I. Introduction 1 II. How to Use This Guide 3 III. Beach and Bay Public Access Sites A. Southeast Texas 7 (Jefferson and Orange Counties) 1. Map 2. Area information 3. Activities/Facilities B. Houston-Galveston (Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Matagorda Counties) 21 1. Map 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities C. Golden Crescent (Calhoun, Jackson and Victoria Counties) 1. Map 79 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities D. Coastal Bend (Aransas, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio and San Patricio Counties) 1. Map 96 2. Area Information 3. Activities/Facilities E. Lower Rio Grande Valley (Cameron and Willacy Counties) 1. Map 2. Area Information 128 3. Activities/Facilities IV. National Wildlife Refuges V. Wildlife Management Areas VI. Chambers of Commerce and Visitor Centers 139 143 147 Introduction It’s no wonder that coastal communities are the most densely populated and fastest growing areas in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Full Final Report Document Printed: 11/1/2018 Document Date: January 21, 2005 2
    1 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST Joni S. Charles, PhD Contracted through the River Systems Institute Texas State University – San Marcos For the National Wildlife Federation February 2005 Commercial Fishing Full Final Report Document Printed: 11/1/2018 Document Date: January 21, 2005 2 Introduction This report focuses on estimating the economic activity specifically associated with commercial fishing in Sabine Lake/Sabine-Neches Estuary, Galveston Bay/Trinity-San Jacinto Estuary, Matagorda Bay/Lavaca-Colorado Estuary, San Antonio Bay/Guadalupe Estuary, Aransas Bay/Mission-Aransas Estuary, Corpus Christi Bay/Nueces Estuary, Baffin Bay/Upper Laguna Madre Estuary, and South Bay/Lower Laguna Madre Estuary. Each bay/estuary area will define a separate geographic region of study comprised of one or more counties. Commercial fishing, therefore, refers to bay (inshore) fishing only. The results show the ex-vessel value of finfish, shellfish and shrimp landings in each of these regions, and the impact this spending had on the economy in terms of earnings, employment and sales output. Estimates of the direct impacts associated with ex-vessel values were produced using IMPLAN, an input-output of the Texas economy developed by the Minnesota IMPLAN Group. The input data was obtained from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) (Culbertson 2004). Commercial fishing impacts are provided in terms of direct expenditure, sales output, income, and employment. These estimates are reported by category of expenditure. A description of IMPLAN is included in Appendix C. Indirect and Induced (Secondary) impacts are generated from the direct impacts calculated by IMPLAN. Indirect impacts represent purchases made by industries from their suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Resources Report Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Results - Open Bay Habitat
    Center for Coastal Studies CCBNEP Living Resources Report Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Results - Open Bay Habitat B. Living Resources - Habitats Detailed community profiles of estuarine habitats within the CCBNEP study area are not available. Therefore, in the following sections, the organisms, community structure, and ecosystem processes and functions of the major estuarine habitats (Open Bay, Oyster Reef, Hard Substrate, Seagrass Meadow, Coastal Marsh, Tidal Flat, Barrier Island, and Gulf Beach) within the CCBNEP study area are presented. The following major subjects will be addressed for each habitat: (1) Physical setting and processes; (2) Producers and Decomposers; (3) Consumers; (4) Community structure and zonation; and (5) Ecosystem processes. HABITAT 1: OPEN BAY Table Of Contents Page 1.1. Physical Setting & Processes ............................................................................ 45 1.1.1 Distribution within Project Area ......................................................... 45 1.1.2 Historical Development ....................................................................... 45 1.1.3 Physiography ...................................................................................... 45 1.1.4 Geology and Soils ................................................................................ 46 1.1.5 Hydrology and Chemistry ................................................................... 47 1.1.5.1 Tides .................................................................................... 47 1.1.5.2 Freshwater
    [Show full text]
  • Fl Rccf'c5tioflbl Millqc Central Texas Coast
    Fl RCCf'C5tiOflBlMillQC to ihe Central Texas Coast Edwin Doran, Jr. k Bernard P. Brown, Jr. TAMU-SG-7 5-606 Sea Grant CoHege Program ~ Texas ARM University A RECREATIONAL GUIDE TO THE CENTRAL TEXAS COAST by EdwinDoran, Jr. and Bernard P. Brown, Jr. DEPARTMENTOF GEOGRAPHY TEXAS ARM UNIVERSITY Publishedby the CENTERFOR MARINE RESOURCES SEA GRANT PROGRAM TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY june, 1975 TAMU-SG-75-606 ACKNOW LED GEMENTS The Center for Marine Resourcesand its principal activity, the Sea GrantProgram, of TexasA&M Universityare dedicated to improving knowledgeof marine-relatedactivities in Texas,for the benefitof the peopleof Texas.The Marine Advisory Services section, whose principal function is providinginformation throughbooks, pamphlets, meet- ingsand other public information activities, has sponsored a number of projects,in thiscase an arrangement with theCenter for AppliedGeo- sciencesof TexasA& M to produceinformational aids which fall within its areasof expertise. Manyhundreds of ownersof facilitieswere helpful in supplyinginfor- mationto BernardBrown during his collection of field data; this booklet would havebeen impossible to producewithout their graciouscoopera- tion. Several individuals on the Texas A&M campus provided assistance: MaryKutac, who did the manuscripttyping and was useful in many otherways during work on the booklet,should be recognizedand thanked. Dr. RobertBerg and the Office of UniversityResearch made available theservices of RogerMaynard who drafted all of the mapswith skill and patience. The authorsin particularwish to expresstheir appreciationfor the grantfrom the MarineAdvisory Services program of SeaGrant at TexasA&M Universitywhich madethe work possible. Note: The information for this publicationwas collected during February,March, and April 1974. Facilities,prices, etc. mayhave changed since that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminants Investigation of the Aransas Bay Complex, Texas, 1985-1986
    CONTAMINANTS INVESTIGATION OF THE ARANSAS BAY COMPLEX, TEXAS, 1985-1986 Prepared By U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Corpus Christi, Texas Authors Lawrence R. Gamble Gerry Jackson Thomas C. Maurer Reviewed By Rogelio Perez Field Supervisor November 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................. iv .~ INTRODUCTION..................................................... 1 METHODS AND MATERIALS ............................................ 5 Sediment . 5 Biota . ~- 5 - - Data Analysis . 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . 12 Organochlorines . 12 Trace Elements ................................................ 15 Petroleum Hydrocarbons ........................................ 24 . Oil or Hazardous Substance Spills............................. 28 SUMMARY .......................................................... 30 RECOHMENDED STUDIES .............................................. 32 LITERATURE CITED ................................................. 33 iii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Compounds and elements analyzed in sediment and biota from the Aransas Bay Complex, Texas, 1985-1986................. 7 2. Nominal detection limits of analytical methods used in the analysis of sediment and biota samples collected from the Aransas Bay Complex, Texas, 1985-1986................. 8 3. Geometric means and ranges (ppb wet weight) of organo- f- chlorines in biota from the Aransas Bay Complex, Texas, _-. _ 1985-1986 . 13 4. Geometric
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Activities and Program Strategies 2006-2011
    S Highlights of Activities and Program Strategies 2006-2011 1 S ADMINISTRATION University of Texas, College of Natural Sciences Dean Mary Ann Rankin University of Texas Marine Science Institute Dr. Lee Fuiman Reserve Manager Sally Morehead RESEARCH AND MONITORING Research Coordinator Dr. Ed Buskey Research Assistants Cammie Hyatt Britt Dean Rae Mooney Lindsey Pollard Cooperating Scientist Dr. Tracy Villareal Postdoctoral Fellow Dr. Denise Bruesewitz Graduate Research Fellow Jena Campbell Graduate Research Assistant Brad Gemmell EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Education Coordinator Carolyn Rose Marine Education Services Sara Pelleteri Naturalists Dr. Rick Tinnin John Williams Linda Fuiman Reta Pearson Volunteer Coordinator Colleen McCue Education Assistant Suzy Citek STEWARDSHIP Stewardship Coordinator Dr. Kiersten Madden Cooperating Scientist Dr. Ken Dunton Research Assistant Anne Evans Animal Rescue Specialists Tony Amos Candice Mottet Marsha Owen COASTAL TRAINING PROGRAM Coastal Training Program Coordinator Chad Leister S The mission of the Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve is to develop and facilitate partnerships that enhance coastal decision making through an integrated program of research, education, and stewardship The vision of the Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve is to develop a center of excellence to create and disseminate knowledge necessary to maintain a healthy Texas coastal zone Three goals are used to support the Reserve mission: Goal 1: To improve understanding of Texas coastal zone ecosystems structure and function. Understanding of ecosystems is based on the creation of new knowledge that is primarily derived through basic and applied research. New knowledge is often an essential component needed to improve coastal decision making. Goal 2: To increase understanding of coastal ecosystems by diverse audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology and Sociology of the Mission-Aransas Estuary
    THE ECOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY OF THE MISSION-ARANSAS ESTUARY THE MISSION-ARANSAS ESTUARY OF AND SOCIOLOGY THE ECOLOGY THE ECOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY OF THE MISSION-ARANSAS ESTUARY AN ESTUARINE AND WATERSHED PROFILE Evans, Madden, and Morehead Palmer Edited by Anne Evans, Kiersten Madden, Sally Morehead Palmer THE ECOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY OF THE MISSION-ARANSAS ESTUARY AN ESTUARINE AND WATERSHED PROFILE Edited by Anne Evans, Kiersten Madden, Sally Morehead Palmer On the cover: Photo courtesy of Tosh Brown, www.toshbrown.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………………………......ix Contributors…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…....xi Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………..xiii Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 Reserve Mission, Vision, and Goals ...................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 Biogeographic Region ....................................................................... 5 Chapter 3 Physical Aspects ................................................................................ 7 References ........................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 4 Climate .............................................................................................. 13 Issues of Concern for Climate .............................................................................. 14 Climate Change ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis AS 36 .T46 N43 the OLD TOD of SAIBT JIARY's OB Copalfo BAY ARD SO.Lle Ijiterestllg PEOPIB WHO Ollce LIVED THERE
    Thesis AS 36 .T46 N43 THE OLD TOD OF SAIBT JIARY'S OB COPAlfO BAY ARD SO.llE IJITERESTllG PEOPIB WHO OllCE LIVED THERE Approved a .A.pprovedt .Ja'~t. COiACll THE OLD TOWN SAIHT KARY'S OH COP.ABO BAY ilD SOME INTERESTING PEOPLE WHO ONCE LIVED THERE THESIS Preaented to the Facult}' of the Graduate School ot Southwest Te.xaa State Teachers College In Partial Fult11J.m.ent or the Requirementa For the Degree ot MASTER OF ARTS Camille Yeauna lfe1ghbora. B.A. (San .Ant01'11o, Tezaa) San Marcos, Te.xaa August, 1942 Preface Probably few aap:lranta to the Kaater•a Degree have prepared their theaea under aa favorable and fortunate circum.stancea as has the writer. Firat of all• the preparation or the subject baa been a labor o£ love, tor the reaaon that the writer•a mother, Macy Ruaaell Yeem•na. •a born 1n Old St. Macy's• and the Russell family torma no 1naign1fioant part of &n:J' hiatOl"J' of that place. Secondly, it haa been a source of proud pleasure that a major part of the hiator,. ot the town has been preaerved by members or the writer's own .fam1l7. pr1nc1pall7 her uncle, the late Judge LJman Brightman Ruasell, of Comanche, Texas. and her aunt,, Jira. Sallie J. (Ruaaell) Burmeister, of Pleasanton, Texaa, now eighty 7eara old, but of remarkable mental vitality. It 1a not often that a historian baa at his or her hand a living pr1Jlar7 source of -terial, but dear Aunt S&llie has been juat that, and haa been with the writer throughout the final .formation of the thea1a.
    [Show full text]