DOCSLIB.ORG

Službeni Glasnik Općine Vela Luka Br. 10/17

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Službeni Glasnik Općine Vela Luka Br. 10/17 ISSN 1846-8713 SLUŽBENI GLASNIK OPĆINE VELA LUKA Godina XXIV., Broj 10, Vela Luka, 28. studenoga 2017. SADRŽAJ OPĆINSKO VIJEĆE str. Odluka o usvajanju Programa ukupnog razvoja Općine Vela Luka od 2018. do 2023. godine ................................................ 2 STRANICA 2 - BROJ 10 SLUŽBENI GLASNIK 28. studenoga 2017. OPĆINE VELA LUKA Na temelju čl. 35 Zakona o lokalnoj i područnoj (regiona- lnoj) samoupravi (NN br. 33/01,129/05, 109/07, 125/08, 36/09, 150/11, 144/12 i 19/13 – pročišćeni tekst ) i čl. 30. Statuta Općine Vela Luka („Službeni glasnik Općine Vela Luka” br. 06/13 – pročišćeni tekst i 09/14), na 3. sjednici Općinskog vijeća Općine Vela Luka, održanoj 27. 11. 2017. godine, donijeta je ODLUKA O USVAJANJU PROGRAMA UKUPNOG RAZVOJA OPĆINE VELA LUKA OD 2018. DO 2023. GODINE Članak 1. Usvaja se Program ukupnog razvoja (PUR) Općine Vela Luka od 2018. do 2023. godine. Program ukupnog razvoja (PUR) Općine Vela Luka od 2018. do 2023. godine. čini sastavni dio ove Odluke i nalazi se u privitku. Članak 2. Ova će se Odluka objaviti u „Službenom glasniku Općine Vela Luka“. Članak 3. Program ukupnog razvoja (PUR) Općine Vela Luka od 2018. do 2023. godine stupa na snagu osmog dana od dana objave u „Službenom glasniku Općine Vela Luka.“ KLASA: 021- 05/17-03/026 URBROJ: 2138/05-02-17-01 Vela Luka, 28. studenoga 2017. godine Predsjednik Općinskog vijeća Zoran Manestar STRANICA 3 - BROJ 10 SLUŽBENI GLASNIK 28. studenoga 2017. OPĆINE VELA LUKA PROGRAM UKUPNOG RAZVOJA OPĆINE VELA LUKA 2018.-2023. STRANICA 4 - BROJ 10 SLUŽBENI GLASNIK 28. studenoga 2017. OPĆINE VELA LUKA Pitanja povezana sa sadržajem Programa ukupnog razvoja Općine Vela Luka uputite na adresu: MICRO projekt d.o.o. Ruđera Boškovića 27, 21000 Split Tel.: 021 555 400 Faks: 021 555 419 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ultimativa.com Zaštita prava Ovdje izneseni sadržaj izrađen je isključivo za Općinu Vela Luka. Društvo s ograničenom odgovornošću MICRO projekt d.o.o. izradilo je Program ukupnog razvoja Općine Vela Luka u skladu sa zahtjevima naručitelja - Općinom Vela Luka za njenu specifičnu primjenu. Ostale osobe koje koriste informacije iz Programa ukupnog razvoja Općine Vela Luka čine to na vlastitu odgovornost i vlastiti rizik. © MICRO projekt d.o.o., 2017. Sva prava pridržana. Sadržaj ovoga dokumenta zaštićen je autorskim pravima. Izmjene, kraćenja, proširenja i nadopune moguće su samo uz prethodnu pisanu suglasnost društva s ograničenom odgovornošću MICRO projekta d.o.o., Split. Umnožavanje je dopušteno samo uz uvjet da na svakom primjerku ostane otisnuta gornja napomena o autorskim pravima. Objavljivanje ili prevođenje dopušteno je samo uz prethodni pisani pristanak društva s ograničenom odgovornošću MICRO projekta d.o.o., Split. U Splitu, listopad 2017. godine 2 STRANICA 5 - BROJ 10 SLUŽBENI GLASNIK 28. studenoga 2017. OPĆINE VELA LUKA SADRŽAJ UVOD ...................................................................................................... 4 ANALIZA STANJA ......................................................................................... 6 1. OPĆI PODATCI ....................................................................................... 6 1.1. GEOGRAFSKI POLOŽAJ I PROSTORNO UREĐENJE ......................................................... 6 1.2. KLIMA .................................................................................................. 9 1.3. POVIJEST I KULTURNA BAŠTINA ....................................................................... 10 1.4. PROMETNA POVEZANOST ............................................................................. 11 1.5. DEMOGRAFSKA ANALIZA .............................................................................. 13 2. GOSPODARSTVO ................................................................................... 17 2.1. PODUZETNIŠTVO ..................................................................................... 17 2.1.1. ANALIZA SUBJEKATA ............................................................................. 17 2.1.2. INSTITUCIJE I MJERE ZA PODRŠKU PODUZETNIŠTVU ............................................... 20 2.2. POLJOPRIVREDA I RURALNI RAZVOJ ................................................................... 22 2.3. TURIZAM ............................................................................................. 26 2.4. TRŽIŠTE RADA ........................................................................................ 32 3. DRUŠTVENE DJELATNOSTI ....................................................................... 38 3.1. SOCIJALNA SKRB ..................................................................................... 38 3.2. ZDRAVSTVO .......................................................................................... 42 3.3. ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE .............................................................................. 43 3.4. KULTURA I ZAŠTITA KULTURNE BAŠTINE ............................................................... 47 3.5. SPORT ............................................................................................... 56 3.6. RELIGIJA ............................................................................................. 57 3.7. MJERE ZAŠTITE LJUDI I IMOVINE ...................................................................... 58 3.8. STANOVANJE I JAVNE ZGRADE ........................................................................ 59 4. ZAŠTITA OKOLIŠA I INFRASTRUKTURA .......................................................... 61 4.1. ZAŠTITA OKOLIŠA ..................................................................................... 61 4.1.1. UPRAVLJANJE OTPADOM ......................................................................... 61 4.1.2. ZAŠTITA PRIRODNIH BOGATSTAVA I UPRAVLJANJE PRIRODNIM RESURSIMA ......................... 62 4.2. INFRASTRUKTURA .................................................................................... 66 4.2.1. PROMETNA INFRASTRUKTURA .................................................................... 66 4.2.2. ENERGETSKA INFRASTRUKTURA .................................................................. 70 4.2.3. KOMUNALNA INFRASTRUKTURA ................................................................... 70 5. INSTITUCIJE ....................................................................................... 74 5.1. INSTITUCIJE REGIONALNE I LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE .................................................... 74 5.2. CIVILNO DRUŠTVO .................................................................................... 76 SWOT ANALIZA ......................................................................................... 78 VIZIJA I STRATEŠKI CILJEVI ........................................................................... 81 VIZIJA OPĆINE VELA LUKA ............................................................................. 81 STRATEŠKI CILJEVI OPĆINE VELA LUKA .............................................................. 83 PRIORITETI I MJERE .................................................................................... 95 FINANCIJSKI OKVIR ZA PROGRAMSKO RAZDOBLJE PUR-A OPĆINE VELA LUKA ................ 103 PROVEDBA PROGRAMA UKUPNOG RAZVOJA ....................................................... 113 USKLAĐENOST SA STRATEŠKIM DOKUMENTIMA VIŠEG REDA ..................................... 126 POPIS TABLICA ........................................................................................ 130 POPIS SLIKA ............................................................................................ 132 POPIS GRAFIKONA ..................................................................................... 133 3 STRANICA 6 - BROJ 10 SLUŽBENI GLASNIK 28. studenoga 2017. OPĆINE VELA LUKA UVOD Strategija razvoja Općine Vele Luke krovni je planski dokument spomenute jedinice lokalne samouprave kojim se određuju dugoročne smjernice za ekonomski, društveni i infrastrukturni razvoj do 2023. godine. Ovim se strateškim dokumentom identificiraju razvojni potencijali općine na temelju analize trenutnog stanja te se u svrhu njihovih ispunjenja predlažu razvojni prioriteti i mjere. Za izradu strategije koristile su se službene statistike, strategije i drugi relevantni dokumenti, uz inpute dionika prikupljene putem prethodno spomenutih radnih skupina. Analiza stanja je izrađena na temelju sveobuhvatnog primarnog istraživanja u kojem su prikupljeni podaci od ustanova, udruga, trgovačkih društava i drugih subjekata putem strukturiranih obrazaca. Analiza stanja predstavlja prvu fazu u izradi Programa ukupnog razvoja Općine Vela Luka. U njoj su prikupljeni i analizirani podatci o trenutnom stanju ključnih razvojnih područja Općine Vela Luka uključujući demografiju, društvene djelatnosti, gospodarstvo i poslovno okruženje, infrastrukturu, zaštitu okoliša i civilno društvo. U njoj su istaknute glavne prednosti i nedostatci područja Općine Vela Luka. One su potom sintetizirane u SWOT (engl. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analizi koja prezentira ključne snage i nedostatke lokalnog područja, odnosno prilike i prijetnje iz njegovog okruženja. Na temelju provedene analize stanja kreirane su podloge za pripremu projektnih prijedloga što će uslijediti u narednim fazama strateškog planiranja. Projektni će prijedlozi biti kreirani kako bi se ojačale prepoznate snage i otklonile, odnosno umanjile slabosti ovoga područja. Analizom stanja Općine definirao se kapital područja, odnosno najvažniji resursi na temelju kojih se mogu prepoznati takozvane točke preokreta, odnosno aktivnosti
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Culture and Tourism in Dubrovnik
    Tour. hosp. manag. Vol. 9, No. 1, Pp. 1-16 I. Ban, V. Vitiprah: CULTURE AND TOURISM IN DUBROVNIK IVO BAN, Ph.D., Full Professor VESNA VRTIPRAH, Ph.D., Full Professor Faculty of Tourism and Foreign Trade, Dubrovnik, University of Split, Croatia CULTURE AND TOURISM IN DUBROVNIK UDC 338.486:7] (497.5-37 Dubrovnik) Received: 06.05.2003 Original scientific paper Dubrovnik's market position was weakening already in the latter half of the 1980s, and the long absence from the evermore demanding tourist market as a consequence of war created additional problems. All this, alongside the unavoidable process of transition and other associated problems, contributed to the serious difficulties facing Dubrovnik's tourism. This paper explores the kind of consequences war- had on the tourism of Dubrovnik and the extent to which cultural heritage was adequately represented both in the tourist supply of Dubrovnik and on the international market. The purpose is to complete an analysis of the existing situation as a basis for the formulation of future strategic goals. With this in mind, the paper presents some directions for the future development of tourism in Dubrovnik. Key words: tourism, Dubrovnik, heritage, cultural tourism, sustainable development. INTRODUCTION Tourist traffic during die war and post-war years dropped to a minimum. The results achieved in 2000, 2001 and 2002 show diat Dubrovnik is successively making a comeback to the international tourist market. However, the future of Dubrovnik's tourism can no longer be viewed from previous positions, due to the changes which occurred as a result of die devastations of war and the establishment of new market relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Outturns of Croatian Municipalities, Cities and Counties for 20151
    NEWSLETTER Zagreb l Smičiklasova 21 doi: 10.3326/nle.2016.108 [email protected] l www.ijf.hr l tel: +385(0)1 4886 444 No. 108 l November 2016 l ISSN 1848-4662 Budget outturns of Croatian municipalities, cities and counties for 20151 KATARINA OTT, MIHAELA BRONIĆ, BRANKO STANIĆ This article aims to provide a simple presentation of basic data on the budget outturns of Croatian local government units in 2015.2 It includes synthesized tables based on the Ministry of Finance's database, showing revenues and expenditures3, as well as surpluses or deficits (in per capita and total terms). Also presented are data on the populations4 and levels of budget transparency in all the local government units5. This analysis and the tables additionally provided in the Excel format, allow all interested parties to get acquainted with the financial condition of their respective local government units in 2015 and make relevant comparisons with the situation in 20146. While the Ministry of Finance does publish budget outturns for all local government units7, they are in the form of oversized Excel tables, with the cities and municipalities arranged by county. Given the large number of local government units (whose complete budgets are presented), the navigation through these tables and comparison across the local units is often difficult. This article gives the reader a snapshot of the basic financial condition of the local government units in 2015, while more detailed information can be found on the Ministry of Finance’s and local government units’ websites. Nevertheless, some notes may be necessary for a proper understanding of the presented data.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Posljedice Domovinskog Rata: Primjer Dubrovačko-Nere- Tvanske Županije
    H[X[aWC;I7H?± 78³?± POSLJEDICE DOMOVINSKOG RATA: PRIMJER DUBROVAČKO-NERE- TVANSKE ŽUPANIJE UVOD Povijest bi trebala biti učiteljica života, no činjenica je da vrijednost „povijesnih zakonitosti“ na istim ili različi- tim prostorima ovisi o mnogim relevantnim okolnostima vremena. U povijesti su dubrovačka zdanja i zidine odolje- le mnogim napadačima te obeshrabrivale najmoćnije sile, poput Mletačke Republike ili Osmanskog Carstva, a isto- dobno su bile sačuvane kako zahvaljujući diplomatskom umijeću Dubrovčana, tako i zbog sklonosti kompromisu. Ironijom sudbine, svoju su paradoksalnu funkcionalnost dubrovačka zdanja i zidine morali dokazivati tek pred na- letima velikosrpskih i crnogorskih agresora. S druge pak strane, hrvatski narod, a osobito Dubrovčani, vjerujući i zanoseći se općepriznatom vrijednošću Dubrovnika kao grada civilizacije i nenadmašne arhitekture, jedinstveno- sti prirodnoga sklada duha, kulture, tradicije, tolerancije i otvorenosti, nisu mogli ni pomisliti, a kamoli očekivati da će se na dubrovačkom području dogoditi bombardiranje, razaranje i devastiranje čitavih područja, te ljudske žrtve. DUBROVAČKO-NERETVANSKA ŽUPANIJA: OSNOVNI PODATCI Dubrovačko–neretvanska županija najjužnija je žu- panija u Republici Hrvatskoj, teritorijalno organizirana u 22 jedinice lokalne uprave i samouprave, odnosno 5 gra- dova (Dubrovnik, Korčula, Ploče, Metković i Opuzen) i 17 općina (Blato, Dubrovačko primorje, Janjina, Konavle, Kula Norinska, Lastovo, Lumbarda, Mljet, Orebić, Poje- zerje, Slivno, Smokvica, Ston, Trpanj, Vela Luka, Zažablje i Župa dubrovačka). Županijsko središte nalazi se u gradu Dubrovniku. Prema broju stanovnika, Dubrovačko–ne- retvanska županija veličinom je petnaesta od dvadeset hrvatskih županija, sa 122.870 stanovnika prema popisu stanovništva iz 2001. godine, što je 2,8% stanovništva Republike Hrvatske. U odnosu na popis stanovništva iz 1991. godine, broj stanovnika smanjio se za 2,7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Pelješac Bridge Construction Going to Affect Tourism
    Ivo Kunst / Zoran Klarić Is the Pelješac Bridge Construction Going to Aff ect Tourism Sustainability of the Peninsula? Abstract Th e whole area of Dubrovnik-Neretva County, situated in the southeastern part of Croatia, is at the moment, in terms of road accessibility, still not satisfactorily connected with the rest of Croatia. Th e lack of its accessibility is mostly caused by the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina's border line cuts in two the Dubrovnik-Neretva County's (land) territory. As a result, on the way from southwest to southeast, or from Split to Dubrovnik, one needs to cross the state border with Bosnia and Herzegovina twice. Th e construction of the Pelješac Bridge (together with a set of interconnecting roads) should improve the present situation signifi cantly, mainly due to the expected redirection of most of the traffi c to the new route across the Pelješac peninsula. However, it is fair to assume that this will additionally 'open' the entire Pelješac peninsula to the increased tourism related traffi c, especially to the demand of one day visitors and/or weekend guests originating mostly from the nearby Bosnia and Herzegovina. Although the redirection of traffi c is expected to create additional pressure on the peninsula's environment and its communal infrastructure, it seems that the Pelješac Bridge construction should not, only by itself, signifi cantly jeopardize neither the sustainability, nor the (desirable) long-term market positioning of the peninsula on the tourism destination market. Keywords: Pelješac Bridge, construction side-eff ects, tourism sustainability, Croatia 1. Introduction Th e whole area of the Dubrovnik-Neretva County, situated in the southeastern part of Croatia, is at the mo- ment, in terms of road accessibility, still not satisfactorily connected with the rest of Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Vascular Flora of the Pelješac Peninsula (Southern Croatia)
    ActaBot. Croat. 59 (2), 411-419,2000 CODEN: ABCRA 25 ISSN 0365-0588 UDC 504.73 (497.5 Pelješac) A contribution to the vascular flora of the Pelješac Peninsula (southern Croatia) Sanja Kovačić Nenad Jasprica 2, Tatjana Lasić2 1 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Dept. Botany, Marulićev trg 20, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. 2 Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, PO Box 83, HR-20101 Dubrovnik, Croatia. The Pelješac Peninsula (355 km2) is located in the south-eastern part of the Croatian Adri­ atic coast and characterised by considerable variations in types of vegetation. As a result of intensive floristic and vegetational research on the Pelješac Peninsula between 1994 and 1999, 64 hitherto unrecorded taxa were identified. A further 43 were identified from existing specimens in the Herbarium of the Lokrum Botanic Garden. The total number of new taxa for this area is thus 107, which brings the total number of vascular flora species for it to more than 1100. Key words: flora, Pelješac, Croatia Introduction Pelješac is the second largest Croatian peninsula (Fig. 1.). It is 67 km long, 7.8 km wide at its widest point, and covers an area of 355 km2. The total length of its coastline is 221.7 km. The highest mountain peaks of the peninsula (Sv. Ilija - 961 m. Rota-713 m, Cučin - 616m, Caro vie -6 3 1 m and others) are aligned in the same northwest to southeast direction as the Dinarid mountain ranges of the mainland. Pelješac is a part of the Karst area. The rock strata mostly consist of highly permeable Jurassic, Cretaceous and Palaeogenic lime­ stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubrovnik – Neretva County
    Addressing MSP Implementation in Case Study Areas Case Study #2 Dubrovnik – Neretva County Deliverable Nr. 1.3.8 Co-funded by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund of the European Union. Agreement EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3/01/S12.742087 - SUPREME ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this report was supported by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund of the European Union- through the Grant Agreement EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3/01/S12.742087 - SUPREME, corresponding to the Call for proposal EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3 for Projects on Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP). DISCLAIMERS This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Union. This work may rely on data from sources external to the SUPREME project Consortium. Members of the Consortium do not accept liability for loss or damage suffered by any third party as a result of errors or inaccuracies in such data. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and neither the European Union nor any member of the SUPREME Consortium, are liable for any use that may be made of the information. The designations employed and the presentation of material in the present document do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of UN Environment/MAP Barcelona Convention Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, area, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names and related data shown on maps included in the present document are not warranted to be error-free nor do they imply official endorsement or acceptance by UN Environment/ MAP Barcelona Convention Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Dubrovnik-Neretva County
    Journal of Business Paradigms Vol 4 No 2, 2019 THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FACEBOOK IN DESTINATION MARKETING: THE CASE OF DUBROVNIK-NERETVA COUNTY Lorena Bašan1 Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Croatia Matea Ban Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Croatia Review Manuscript Received October 20th 2019 Manuscript Accepted December 25th 2019 ABSTRACT Since the emergence and rapid development of the Internet and its implementation in companies within the tourism and hospitality industry, Internet marketing has become a vital marketing tool. Social media, in particular, are one of the most important media in Internet communication and an integral part of a large number of business entities, including those related to tourism. Many tourist destinations that understand the importance of social media as a source of information in the phase of tourist-destination selection and recognise the opportunities social media provide are using social networks to communicate and interact with tourists. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to determine the implementation level of Facebook as the most often used networking site in destination marketing. The paper is based on empirical research conducted in Dubrovnik-Neretva County using content analysis. Results obtained by this study allow decision makers in destination marketing to implement Facebook in a more efficient way, by exploiting the underutilized advantages of social media to gain a competitive advantage in the contemporary tourist market and achieve better business results in the future. 1 Address correspondence to Lorena Bašan Associate Professor, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Department of Marketing, Opatija, Croatia, E-mail: [email protected] 46 The Implementation Of Facebook In Destination Marketing Bašan L., Ban M.
    [Show full text]
  • Modèle De Document
    STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS OF HIGH NATURE VALUE FARMING IN THE DALMATIAN ISLANDS Case studies from Mljet and Korčula Islands and Pelješac Peninsula in Croatia Collective report of the Advanced Master “Forest, Nature & Society” Option “Nature and Society Management at International level” Teaching module “environmental assessment of international projects on natural resource management” From 18th of February to 11th of March 2017 Study realized by: Chloé Abdessater, Laurianne Bitton-Lebeau, Laetitia Bisiaux, Marie Bourdin, Pauline Briand, Krystel Corsagni, Maxime de Rochegonde, Marc Gomes, Marie Graziella-Cailleau, Zoé Ginter, Robin Le Priol, Johan Litaudon, Elodie Lhuer, Léonard Normand, Iris Parrot, Simon Peyrin, Thomas Robinet, Marie Valentin Mentored by: Sandra Nicolle, Alexandre Gaudin, and Maya Leroy (AgroParisTech) Claire Bernard & François Lerin (CIHEAM – IAMM) April 2017 Cover picture : Korčula island, March 2017 – picture taken by M. Bourdin. - 2 - FOREWORD The formation and research group in “Environmental management of forests and tropical ecosystems” (www.agroparistech.fr/geeft) hosts every year students from diverse backgrounds – from agronomy to political sciences, through economy and ecology – as part of the FNS-MI specialized Master (Forest, Nature and Society, Management Nature and Society Abroad option). The goal is to train them to take into account social and environmental stakes in the management of forest and agro-forest ecosystems in an international context. At the end of the formation, a collective field study in a foreign country is realized, in partnership with professionals and scientists from the hosting countries. It enables the students to apply on a field study the broad range of technical, theoretical and methodological competencies that they developed throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Pretovarna Stanica Janjina
    RN 2016/021-1 ELABORAT ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA U POSTUPKU OCJENE O POTREBI PROCJENE UTJECAJA NA OKOLIŠ ZA ZAHVAT: PRETOVARNA STANICA JANJINA NARUČITELJ: AGENCIJA ZA GOSPODARENJE OTPADOM d.o.o. PRED DVOROM 1 20 000 DUBROVNIK VITA PROJEKT d.o.o. za projektiranje i savjetovanje u zaštiti okoliša HR-10000 Zagreb, Ilica 191C Tel:+ 385 (0)1 3774 240 Fax:+ 385 (0)1 3751 350 Mob:+ 385 (0)98 398 582 email:[email protected] www.vitaprojekt.hr za projektiranje i savjetovanje u zaštiti okoliša d.o.o. Zagreb ▪ Ilica 191c ▪ www.vitaprojekt.hr Nositelj zahvata: Agencija za gospodarenjem otpadom d.o.o. Naslov: Elaborat zaštite okoliša za ocjenu o potrebi procjene utjecaja na okoliš za zahvat: Pretovarna stanica Janjina Radni nalog/ dokument: RN/2016/021-1 Ovlaštenik: VITA PROJEKT d.o.o. Zagreb Voditelj izrade: Domagoj Vranješ mag.ing.prosp.arch., univ.spec.oecoing. Suradnici: Ena Bićanić Marković, mag.ing.prosp.arch. Monika Škegro, mag.biol.exp. Ivana Tomašević, mag.ing.prosp.arch. Goran Lončar, mag.oecol., mag.geogr. Martina Rezo, mag.oecol. et prot. nat. Petar Krešimir Žderić, dipl.ing.građ. Datum izrade: Srpanj 2016. M.P. ELABORAT ZAŠTITE OKOLIŠA U POSTUPKU OCJENE O POTREBI PROCJENE UTJECAJA NA OKOLIŠ ZA ZAHVAT: PRETOVARNA STANICA JANJINA Str. 1 od 58 za projektiranje i savjetovanje u zaštiti okoliša d.o.o. Zagreb ▪ Ilica 191c ▪ www.vitaprojekt.hr SADRŽAJ UVOD .................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. PODACI O ZAHVATU I OPIS OBILJEŽJA ZAHVATA
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Multimodal Mobility System in the Dubrovnik Airport
    LAirA Landside Airport Accessibility Report no.2: Analysis of Multimodal Mobility in FUA Towards Dubrovnik Airport January 2018 Zračna luka Dubrovnik d.o.o., Dobrota 24, Močići, CLIENT 20213 Čilipi, Croatia Mobilita Evolva d.o.o. – Froudeova 5, 10 020 Zagreb, Croatia CONSULTANT DOCUMENT Report no. 2 - FINAL TYPE STUDY Una Vidović, mag. ing. arch. DIRECTOR Una Vidović, mag. ing. arch. EXPERT TEAM Expert Team Leader – LEADER architect Božo Cicvarić, mag. ing. traff. Expert Team Member - traffic engineer Klara Mahmić, mag. geogr. Expert Team Member - Masters degree in geography (GIS expert) PARTICIPATED Tomislav Vešligaj, mag. ing. traff. IN STUDY Expert Team Member - DEVELOPMENT traffic engineer Alen Tursunović, mag. ing. traff. Expert Team Member - traffic engineer Viktor Jozić, mag. ing. traff. Expert Team Member - traffic engineer DIRECTOR Una Vidović, PhD. Architect. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2. DUBROVNIK – NERETVA COUNTY (FUA) ................................................................ 2 2.1. SIZE ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. POPULATION ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3. KONAVLE MUNICIPALITY .................................................................................... 5 3. DUBROVNIK AIRPORT .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni Ured Split IZVJEŠĆE O OBAVLJENOJ REVIZIJI UČINKOVITOSTI UPRAVLJANJA I
    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni ured Split IZVJEŠĆE O OBAVLJENOJ REVIZIJI UČINKOVITOSTI UPRAVLJANJA I RASPOLAGANJA NOGOMETNIM STADIONIMA I IGRALIŠTIMA U VLASNIŠTVU JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE NA PODRUČJU DUBROVAČKO-NERETVANSKE ŽUPANIJE Split, srpanj 2019. S A D R Ž A J stranica PREDMET I CILJEVI REVIZIJE 2 METODE REVIZIJE 2 KRITERIJI ZA OCJENU UČINKOVITOSTI 3 UPRAVLJANJE I RASPOLAGANJE NOGOMETNIM STADIONIMA I IGRALIŠTIMA U VLASNIŠTVU JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE NA PODRUČJU DUBROVAČKO- NERETVANSKE ŽUPANIJE 5 Evidencije o nogometnim stadionima i igralištima 6 Normativno uređenje upravljanja i raspolaganja nogometnim stadionima i igralištima 14 Upravljanje i raspolaganje nogometnim stadionima i igralištima 16 Nadzor nad upravljanjem i raspolaganjem nogometnim stadionima i igralištima 20 OCJENA UČINKOVITOSTI I UPRAVLJANJA I RASPOLAGANJA NOGOMETNIM STADIONIMA I IGRALIŠTIMA U VLASNIŠTVU JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE NA PODRUČJU DUBROVAČKO-NERETVANSKE ŽUPANIJE 22 OČITOVANJE JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE 24 REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni ured Split KLASA: 041-01/18-10/94 URBROJ: 613-19-19-51 Split, 18. srpnja 2019. IZVJEŠĆE O OBAVLJENOJ REVIZIJI UČINKOVITOSTI UPRAVLJANJA I RASPOLAGANJA NOGOMETNIM STADIONIMA I IGRALIŠTIMA U VLASNIŠTVU JEDINICA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE NA PODRUČJU DUBROVAČKO-NERETVANSKE ŽUPANIJE Na temelju odredaba članaka 19. i 21. Zakona o Državnom uredu za reviziju (Narodne novine 25/19), obavljena je revizija učinkovitosti upravljanja i raspolaganja nogometnim stadionima i igralištima u vlasništvu
    [Show full text]