DOCSLIB.ORG

Dubrovnik – Neretva County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dubrovnik – Neretva County Addressing MSP Implementation in Case Study Areas Case Study #2 Dubrovnik – Neretva County Deliverable Nr. 1.3.8 Co-funded by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund of the European Union. Agreement EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3/01/S12.742087 - SUPREME ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this report was supported by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund of the European Union- through the Grant Agreement EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3/01/S12.742087 - SUPREME, corresponding to the Call for proposal EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3 for Projects on Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP). DISCLAIMERS This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Union. This work may rely on data from sources external to the SUPREME project Consortium. Members of the Consortium do not accept liability for loss or damage suffered by any third party as a result of errors or inaccuracies in such data. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and neither the European Union nor any member of the SUPREME Consortium, are liable for any use that may be made of the information. The designations employed and the presentation of material in the present document do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of UN Environment/MAP Barcelona Convention Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, area, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names and related data shown on maps included in the present document are not warranted to be error-free nor do they imply official endorsement or acceptance by UN Environment/ MAP Barcelona Convention Secretariat. UN Environment/MAP Barcelona Convention Secretariat is not accountable for the data and cannot guarantee that they are correct, accurate or comprehensive. SUPREME Deliverable Nr. C 1.3.8 Supporting maritime spatial Planning in the Eastern Project Full title Mediterranean (SUPREME) Project Acronym SUPREME Agreement EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3/01/S12.742087 Grant Agreement No. - SUPREME Coordinator Dr. Pierpaolo Campostrini Project start date and duration 01/01/2017 – 31/12/2018 Project website http://www.msp-supreme.eu/ Deliverable Nr. 1.3.8 Deliverable Date 30/12/2018 Status: Final (F) / Draft (D) / Revised draft Final (RV) Task number C 1.3.8 Addressing MSP Implementation in Task number Title Case Study Areas Case Study #2: Dubrovnik – Neretva County Responsible Institute (acronym) CISD Authors 3 SUPREME Deliverable C 1.3.8 Table of contents Introduction 6 A. Relation to the spatial planning framework 8 B. Case study within the spatial planning framework of the Republic of Croatia 10 C. Analysis of the case study area 13 C.1. Analytical part ........................................................................................................................... 13 C.1.1. Demographic situation and urbanization .......................................................................... 13 C.1.2. Fishery ............................................................................................................................... 21 C.1.3. Aquaculture ....................................................................................................................... 28 C.1.4. Hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation........................................................................ 34 C.1.5. Mineral and raw resource exploitation ............................................................................. 40 C.1.6. Energetics .......................................................................................................................... 45 C.1.7. Maritime transport, shipping, and shipbuilding ................................................................ 55 C.1.8. Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 73 C.1.9. Scientific research ............................................................................................................. 93 C.1.10. Military activities ............................................................................................................... 97 C.1.11. Marine environment and nature protection ................................................................... 102 C.1.12. Underwater and coastal cultural heritage ....................................................................... 124 C.1.13. Risk and climate change .................................................................................................. 134 C.1.14. Land and air traffic connection ........................................................................................ 144 C.1.15. Submarine and offshore infrastructure - review ............................................................. 146 C.2. EFPZ and the Continental shelf of the Republic of Croatia..................................................... 148 C.3. Land-sea interactions.............................................................................................................. 151 C.4. Transnational cooperation ..................................................................................................... 155 C.5. SWOT analysis of case study area .......................................................................................... 157 C.6. Case study analysis summary ................................................................................................. 163 D. Visioning, scenario, and objectives of MSP 171 D.1. Defining strategic framework ................................................................................................. 171 D.1.1. Review of development objectives in the case study marine area .................................. 171 D.2. Development vision ................................................................................................................ 186 D.3. Development scenarios .......................................................................................................... 187 D.4. Defining objectives of case study MSP ................................................................................... 195 4 SUPREME Deliverable C 1.3.8 E. Results of the case study implementation 200 E.1. Results of case study MSP ...................................................................................................... 200 E.1.1. Existing spatial plans encompassing areas of internal and territorial sea in the spatial planning system ........................................................................................ 200 E.1.2. Spatial plans of EFPZ and the Continental shelf of the Republic of Croatia ..................... 204 E.2. Recommendations for improvement of maritime spatial planning in the Republic of Croatia ....................................................................................................... 206 F. Summary of procedural steps 210 G. Summary of stakeholder involvement 213 H. Evaluation of MSP process 216 5 SUPREME Deliverable C 1.3.8 Introduction The case study implementation is the final sub-component of the SUPREME project (C1.3.8.) which aims to produce case studies in selected partner pilot areas. Development of case study provides a review of the approach to maritime spatial planning (MSP) and cross-border cooperation in Eastern Mediterranean area while exploring the issues highlighted in the previous activities, in line with the progress made in maritime spatial planning (MSP) at each Member State. The Croatian case study includes a spatial-statistical analysis of the condition of marine and coastal area of the Dubrovnik-Neretva County, and the analysis itself is consistent with the maritime categories from the Directive 2014/89/EU. The sub-component also envisions a review of development objectives and visions at regional, national and European level to identify the most accessible form of spatial development in line with the overall strategic framework. The case study perceives the implementation of maritime spatial planning and access to cross-border cooperation as such demonstrates problems in the processes. The project level of the case study, in accordance with the guidelines of the partner, has been adapted to the existing progress and success of maritime spatial planning because the Republic of Croatia has already integrated and implemented maritime spatial planning through the existing system based on the Physical Planning Act (OG 153/13, 65/17, 114/18). The Physical Planning Institute of the Dubrovnik-Neretva County conducted a parallel analysis of the inclusion of proposed categories of marine area use from the Directive 2014/89/EU in county and local level plans during the implementation of the SUPREME project. The conclusion of the research indicates that all marine area uses are being respected, except for the hydrocarbon exploration area, because the County Assembly adopted a Conclusion1 that emphasizes high risk to other purposes in space (tourism, fisheries, aquaculture, etc.). In the field of military exercises and scientific research, the county institute has no information. Also, during the preparation of the spatial plan, the county institute has received requests related to other purposes, which need to be considered. On the other hand, spatial plans of local level have taken into account all relevant uses from the Directive 2014/89/EU and included recreational areas on marine area (bathing areas, natural and anthropogenic beaches, coastal interventions,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE FORMAT (Hrvatski Jezik)
    E UROPEAN CURRICULUM VITAE FORMAT (hrvatski jezik) OSOBNI PODACI Prezime i ime Šaravanja Krešimir Adresa Posao: Građevinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Mostaru, Matice hrvatske bb, 88000 Mostar, BiH & Dom: Akademika Ivana Zovke 12, 88000 Mostar, BiH Fiksni telefon +387 36 355-000 (centrala) Telefaks +387 36 355-001 Mobilni telefon +387 63 312-993 E-mail adresa [email protected]; [email protected] Nacionalnost Hrvat Državljanstvo/a Bosna i Hercegovina & Republika Hrvatska Datum rođenja 18.03.1960. Spol muški RADNO ISKUSTVO Datumi (od - do) Od 2016. Zanimanje ili radno mjesto Viši asistent Glavne aktivnosti i Nastavne i druge aktivnosti odgovornosti Ime i adresa poslodavca Građevinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Mostaru, Matice hrvatske bb, 88.000 Mostar, BiH Vrsta djelatnosti ili sektor „Građevinski materijali I“, „Građevinski materijali II“, „Trajnost betona“ Datumi (od - do) 2013.-2016. Zanimanje ili radno mjesto Savjetnik i Quality manager Glavne aktivnosti i Tehnički menadžment i poslovi kontrole kvalitete odgovornosti Ime i adresa poslodavca „IGH“ d.o.o. Mostar, Bišće polje bb, 88.000 Mostar, BiH Vrsta djelatnosti ili sektor Datumi (od - do) 2000.-2013. Zanimanje ili radno mjesto Direktor/zamjenik direktora Glavne aktivnosti i Rukovođenje radom građevinskog instituta odgovornosti Ime i adresa poslodavca „IGH-MOSTAR“ d.o.o. Mostar, Bišće polje bb, 88.000 Mostar, BiH Vrsta djelatnosti ili sektor Uprava tvrtke Datumi (od - do) 1998.-2000. Zanimanje ili radno mjesto Zamjenik ministra Glavne aktivnosti i Sudjelovanje u rukovođenju radom Ministarstva odgovornosti Ime i adresa poslodavca Ministarstvo prostornog uređenja, graditeljstva i zaštite okoliša HNŽ/K, Stjepana Radića 3, 88.000 Mostar, BiH Vrsta djelatnosti ili sektor Javna uprava Datumi (od - do) 1997.-1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Developement of Dubrovnik Airport, Konavle Municipality Non-Technical Summary
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPEMENT OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT, KONAVLE MUNICIPALITY NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Zagreb, May 2014. Developer: ZraĀna luka Dubrovnik ltd. Developer: ZRAýNA LUKA DUBROVNIK ltd. Dobrota 24 20 213 ýilipi Practitioners: DVOKUT ECRO ltd. Trnjanska 37, 10 000 Zagreb Title of the study: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPEMENT OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT, KONAVLE MUNICIPALITY NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Study Manager: Mario Pokrivaþ, mag. ing. traff. Director: Marta Brkiü, mag. ing. agr. 2 environmental impact assessment Developement of Dubrovnik airport, Konavle municipality non-technical summary CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 3 A.1. CURRENT STATE OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT ....................................................... 3 A.2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF DUBROVNIK AIRPORT........................................... 7 B. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT LOCATION ENVIRONMENT ........................................ 12 C. REVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT .................. 20 D PROPOSAL FOR THE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ACCEPTABILITY ASSESSMENT .... 31 D.2. PROPOSAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROGRAMME WITH IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .............................................................. 38 DVOKUT ECRO d.o.o. 1 environmental impact assessment Developement of Dubrovnik airport, Konavle municipality
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution's Submission Pursuant to Rule 65
    IT-95-5/18-PT 18182 D 18182 - D 15860 18 May 2009 PvK UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 18 May 2009 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Iain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Christoph Flügge Judge Michèle Picard Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused: Radovan Karad`i} 18181 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s order of 6 April 20091 and Rule 65 ter (E)(i)- (iii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules), the Prosecution hereby files: (i) the final version of the Prosecutor's pre-trial brief (Appendix I); (ii) the confidential list of witnesses the Prosecutor intends to call (Appendix II); and (iii) the confidential list of exhibits the Prosecutor intends to offer into evidence (Appendix III). 2. Attached to Appendix I, the final pre-trial brief, are the following: - Confidential Attachment Detailing Events in the Municipalities: these set out the political background and events in the 27 municipalities;2 - Confidential Appendix A: Schedules A-G setting out additional particulars and the supporting evidence for the scheduled incidents; 1 Order Following on Status Conference and Appended Work Plan, 6 April 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Tourism in Dubrovnik
    Tour. hosp. manag. Vol. 9, No. 1, Pp. 1-16 I. Ban, V. Vitiprah: CULTURE AND TOURISM IN DUBROVNIK IVO BAN, Ph.D., Full Professor VESNA VRTIPRAH, Ph.D., Full Professor Faculty of Tourism and Foreign Trade, Dubrovnik, University of Split, Croatia CULTURE AND TOURISM IN DUBROVNIK UDC 338.486:7] (497.5-37 Dubrovnik) Received: 06.05.2003 Original scientific paper Dubrovnik's market position was weakening already in the latter half of the 1980s, and the long absence from the evermore demanding tourist market as a consequence of war created additional problems. All this, alongside the unavoidable process of transition and other associated problems, contributed to the serious difficulties facing Dubrovnik's tourism. This paper explores the kind of consequences war- had on the tourism of Dubrovnik and the extent to which cultural heritage was adequately represented both in the tourist supply of Dubrovnik and on the international market. The purpose is to complete an analysis of the existing situation as a basis for the formulation of future strategic goals. With this in mind, the paper presents some directions for the future development of tourism in Dubrovnik. Key words: tourism, Dubrovnik, heritage, cultural tourism, sustainable development. INTRODUCTION Tourist traffic during die war and post-war years dropped to a minimum. The results achieved in 2000, 2001 and 2002 show diat Dubrovnik is successively making a comeback to the international tourist market. However, the future of Dubrovnik's tourism can no longer be viewed from previous positions, due to the changes which occurred as a result of die devastations of war and the establishment of new market relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia the Mediterranean As It Once Was
    Croatia The Mediterranean as it once was. www.croatia.hr free IMAGE CATALOGUE english Croatia his is a story about a land of a thousand islands, her magi- T cal nature and rich heritage, her great Men whose great deeds have forever etched the name of Croatia in large letters on the map of the world. This is a story about a land whose beauties have been celebrated since ancient times. From Cas- siodorus, who wrote of the divine life led by Patricians on her shores, to Dante, who wrote his immortal verses, enthralled by the epic scenes of the blue expanse, and all the way to George Bernard Shaw, who found his paradise on Earth right here. Croatia has always been a place of true inspiration. Through pictures of unforgettable scenes and incredible stories, we have endeavoured to bring all the special qualities of this wonderful land that is our beautiful country as close to you as possible. Indeed, in nine fairytale-like chapters we have managed to lay before you the pearls of her diversity. Do not hesitate; descend the thousand-year-old stairs of a rich, tur- bulent and glorious history and discover destinations in which experiences of the warm, blue Mediterranean are enhanced by the charm of the tranquil and picturesque green mountains in the north and the fertile golden plains in the easternmost part of the land. All that you have dreamt of is now within reach. Browsing through the pages of this catalogue you are surely bound to find a place for your perfect holiday.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Underwater Heritage in Croatia a Handbook Exploring Underwater Heritage in Croatia a Handbook
    exploring underwater heritage in croatia a handbook exploring underwater heritage in croatia a handbook Zadar, 2009. AN ROMAN PERIOD SHIPWRECK WITH A CARGO OF AMPHORAE ROMaN PeRIOD ShIPWRecK IN The ČaVLIN ShaLLOWS There are several hundred Roman pe- riod shipwrecks in the Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea, the majority of which are devastated, but about a dozen of which have survived the ravages of time and unethical looters. They have been preserved intact, or with only minor damage, which offers underwater archaeologists an oppor- tunity for complete research. The very large number of Roman ship- wrecks is not unexpected, but speaks rather of the intensity of trade and importance of navigation on the eastern side of the Adriatic Sea, and of the dangers our sea hides. Roman period shipwrecks can be dated either by the type of cargo they carried or by some further analysis (the age of the wood, for example), and the datings range from the 4th century BC to the 6th century. The cargos of these ships were varied: from fine pot- tery, vessels and plates, stone construction elements and brick to the most frequent cargo – amphorae. The amphora was used as packag- ing from the period of the Greece colonisation to the late Roman and the Byzantine supremacy. There are remains of shipwrecks with cargos of amphorae that can be researched on the seabed, covered by Archaeological underwater excavation with the aid of a water dredge protective iron cages, and there are those that, as per documentation, need to be raised to the surface and presented on land.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodič Kroz Tipove Staništa Bih Prema Direktivi O Staništima EU
    Vodič kroz tipove staništa BiH prema Direktivi o staništima EU Januar 2015 Ova publikacija je rezultat projekta Podrška provođenju Direktive o pticama i Direktive o staništima u Bosni i Hercegovini (2012-2015). Projekt je financirala Švedska, Švedska Agencija za međunarodnu saradnju za razvoj, a upravljala mu je Delegacija Europske unije u Bosni i Hercegovini. Stavovi izraženi u ovoj publikaciji su stavovi autora i nikako se ne mogu smatrati stavovima Evropske unije. Autori: Đorđije Milanović, Jugoslav Brujić, Samir Đug, Edina Muratović i Lada Lukić Bilela Urednik: Peter Skoberne Tehnički urednik: Ivaylo Zafirov Voditelj projektnog tima: Aleksander Golob Članice i članovi Upravnog odbora projekta: Nermina Skejović-Hurić (koordinatorica projekta), Tomislav Lukić, Željka Stojičić, Zineta Mujaković, Adi Habul, Hanka Mušimbegović, Azra Rogović-Grubić, Boris Marković, Semra Buza, Stanko Stančić i Zoran Lukač Dizajn: Bunker www.madeinbunker.com Tisak: Ringeis www.ringeis.ba Izdavač: Prospect C&S s.a.. Rue du Prince Royal 83, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Slobodni ste kopirati, distribuirati i prikazati ovaj rad pod uvjetima da se navodi njegove autore, da se rad ne koristi u komercijalne svrhe i da se ništa ne mijenja, transformira ili nadograđuje bez spominjanja autora. U svakom drugom slučaju traži se pisano odobrenje od strane izdavača. 2 Sadržaj Uvod 8 Pregled evropskih značajnih tipova staništa u Bosni i Hercegovini 11 Slana staništa 16 1110 Plitka pjeskovita morska dna 16 uvijek prekrivena vodom 16 1160 Veliki plitki zalivi i zatoni 18 1240 Stjenovite i kamenite mediteranske 20 obale sa endemičnim vrstama roda 20 Limonium 20 Slatke vode 22 3130 Oligotrofne do mezotrofne stajaćice sa vegetacijom Littorelletea uniflorae i/ili Isoeto-Nanojuncetea 22 3140 Tvrde oligo-mezotrofne vode sa bentoskom vegetacijom Chara sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Bodies at Risk
    Results of initial characterization of the groundwater bodies in Croatian karst Zeljka Brkic Croatian Geological Survey Department for Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Zagreb, Croatia Contractor: Croatian Geological Survey, Department for Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Team leader: dr Zeljka Brkic Co-authors: dr Ranko Biondic (Kupa river basin – karst area, Istria, Hrvatsko Primorje) dr Janislav Kapelj (Una river basin – karst area) dr Ante Pavicic (Lika region, northern and middle Dalmacija) dr Ivan Sliskovic (southern Dalmacija) Other associates: dr Sanja Kapelj dr Josip Terzic dr Tamara Markovic Andrej Stroj { On 23 October 2000, the "Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy" or, in short, the EU Water Framework Directive (or even shorter the WFD) was finally adopted. { The purpose of WFD is to establish a framework for the protection of inland surface waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater (protection of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, reduction in pollution groundwater, protection of territorial and marine waters, sustainable water use, …) { WFD is one of the main documents of the European water policy today, with the main objective of achieving “good status” for all waters within a 15-year period What is the groundwater body ? { “groundwater body” means a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or aquifers { Member States shall identify, within each river basin district: z all bodies of water used for the abstraction of water intended for human consumption providing more than 10 m3 per day as an average or serving more than 50 persons, and z those bodies of water intended for such future use.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment Adriatic-Ionian Operational Programme 2014- 2020
    Draft Environmental Report (Based on v ersion 1 of the draft OP , 9.7.2014 ) Strategic Environmental Assessment Adriatic-Ionian Operational Programme 2014- 2020 MetisGmbH A-1220 Vienna, Donau-City-Straße6 Tel.: +43 1 997 15 70, Fax: +43 1 997 15 70 66 E-mail: [email protected] www.metis -vienna.eu Vienna, 15.7.2014 Authors: João Pedro Silva Christine Hamza Haris Martinos Country experts: Enrico Gaspari Julija Marosek Evis Disha Darko Znaor Draft Environmental Report (Based on version 1 of the draft OP, 9.7.2014) Strategic Environmental Assessment Adriatic-Ionian Operational Programme 2014- 2020 AIOP Draft SEA Report Content Non technical summary ................................................................................................ 7 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Objectives of the SEA ........................................................................................... 11 1.2 Background and methodology .............................................................................. 11 1.3 Data sources ......................................................................................................... 12 2 Summary of the programme .............................................................................. 13 2.1 Background of ETC regulation .............................................................................. 13 2.2 Priority axes, thematic objectives and investment priorities, specific objectives and measures
    [Show full text]
  • Is Mljet – Melita in Dalmatia the Island of St. Paul's Shipwreck?
    Marija Buzov - Is Mljet – Melita in Dalmatia the island of... (491-505) Histria Antiqua, 21/2012 Marija BUZOV IS MLJET – MELITA IN DALMATIA THE ISLAND OF ST. PAUL’S SHIPWRECK? UDK 904:656.61.085.3>(497.5)(210.7 Mljet) Marija Buzov, Ph. D. Original scientific paper Institute of archaeology Received: 14.05.2012. Gajeva 32 Approved: 23.08.2012. 10000 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: [email protected] naeus Pompeius’ expression Navigare necesse est, as well as mare nostrum, were created out of a simple necessity. The Romans became seafarers out of necessity, not because they had any inclination to become so, because through Ggradual spread of their authority and power to the Mediterranean coasts they were forced to learn the shipbuild- ing technique and seafaring skill from other peoples, particularly from the maritime Etruscans, Greeks and Carthaginians. The eastern Adriatic coast had been connected from prehistory, antiquity and the Middle Ages with places at the western coast of the Adriatic Sea, but also with certain areas of the Mediterranean Sea. In addition to fishing, exchange of goods and travel, the Adriatic Sea also experienced shipwrecks, as testified by a number of finds. Key-words: Mljet-Melita, Dalmatia, shipwreck, St.Paul 1 Translation: The castaway St. Paul the Apostle in the sea called the Bay of Venice, and after the shipwreck the Guest or on a Is Mljet – Melita in Dalmatia the insula vocabatur. Inspectiones anticriticae autore D. Ignatio dual interpretation of two places from the Georgio. Benedictino e congregatione Melitensi Ragusina. Acts of the Apostles in chapter XXVII, line island of St.
    [Show full text]